FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > police state uk
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well seeing as its the MPs asking for reasons why he was detained, I think this one is all on the police. Not saying there aren't problems with the government, but apportion blame where its due." home office? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well seeing as its the MPs asking for reasons why he was detained, I think this one is all on the police. Not saying there aren't problems with the government, but apportion blame where its due. home office?" Yes, but that doesn't mean the Home Office told them to do it. I work for the Government but most of the time I don't do what they say | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some slightly melodramatic statements, given the fact that there's many lawful protests all over the country. No doubt you'll be kidnapped & put in a labour camp for making these comments publicly. " Or he'll "commit suicide" or die in a "car accident" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin " I am sure that was apt back in the 18th century. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin I am sure that was apt back in the 18th century." And I doubt Franklin meant liberty in the sense of a few hours in pokey. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin I am sure that was apt back in the 18th century." But the basic tenant is as applicable today as it was back then - possibly even more so. The erosion of civil liberties we have seen, to provide safe harbour and wage an intangible 'war on terror' over the last 12 years, have been nothing short of astounding. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin I am sure that was apt back in the 18th century. But the basic tenant is as applicable today as it was back then - possibly even more so. The erosion of civil liberties we have seen, to provide safe harbour and wage an intangible 'war on terror' over the last 12 years, have been nothing short of astounding. " Yet it doesn't seem to have affected my life in any way. Hmmm. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin I am sure that was apt back in the 18th century. But the basic tenant is as applicable today as it was back then - possibly even more so. The erosion of civil liberties we have seen, to provide safe harbour and wage an intangible 'war on terror' over the last 12 years, have been nothing short of astounding. Yet it doesn't seem to have affected my life in any way. Hmmm." Fair Enough. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did." no he did not try reading the new from time to time. I would post a link to them but i think you cannot post links on FAB | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did. no he did not try reading the new from time to time. I would post a link to them but i think you cannot post links on FAB" "You can link to: Any well recognised news site (bbc, times, telegraph, sun, notw, cnn and all the rest) " Someone's imagination doesn't count. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did." Look them up if you wish. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did. Look them up if you wish." They're YOUR examples. The least you can do is cite your authority. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did. Look them up if you wish. They're YOUR examples. The least you can do is cite your authority." well there on of them we meet you half way. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/aug/08/olympics-spectator-parkinsons-arrest-smiling | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did. Look them up if you wish. They're YOUR examples. The least you can do is cite your authority. well there on of them we meet you half way. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/aug/08/olympics-spectator-parkinsons-arrest-smiling" By his own admission, he was arrested for BOP, not for not smiling. You found the other one yet? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did. Look them up if you wish. They're YOUR examples. The least you can do is cite your authority." Onny, as you well know, this is a lounge forum on a swingers site, not a peer re_iewed scientific magazine. The lack of citation does not make an item untrue. Or alternatively, i look forward to you citing conclusive proof every time you blame the Tories for absolutely everything. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not noticed any difference in my liberty yet? Mind you I don't break the law." Just wait till the laws change. "but it wasn't supposed to be like this" will ring around the country. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did. Look them up if you wish. They're YOUR examples. The least you can do is cite your authority. well there on of them we meet you half way. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/aug/08/olympics-spectator-parkinsons-arrest-smiling By his own admission, he was arrested for BOP, not for not smiling. You found the other one yet?" To Quote the cop "The man was positioned close to a small group of protesters and based on his manner, his state of dress and his proximity to the course, officers made an arrest to prevent a possible breach of the peace," Surrey police said in a statement." Now how is this BOP pray tell? Please not "based on his manner" i.e. no smiling. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did. Look them up if you wish. They're YOUR examples. The least you can do is cite your authority. well there on of them we meet you half way. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/aug/08/olympics-spectator-parkinsons-arrest-smiling By his own admission, he was arrested for BOP, not for not smiling. You found the other one yet?" RTFA aka Read The Fucking Article, especially the bit where he says "I was arrested for not smiling". Or indeed all of it, especially where the police say what he was arrested for, and then tell us what he admitted? By eck, if everybody was deemed to have made an admission of what they were arrested for then we really are in a Police State. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did. Look them up if you wish. They're YOUR examples. The least you can do is cite your authority. well there on of them we meet you half way. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/aug/08/olympics-spectator-parkinsons-arrest-smiling By his own admission, he was arrested for BOP, not for not smiling. You found the other one yet?" Ys i have as your been lazzy http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/henryporter/2009/jul/16/photography-police-_iew-delete-images | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did. Look them up if you wish. They're YOUR examples. The least you can do is cite your authority. well there on of them we meet you half way. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/aug/08/olympics-spectator-parkinsons-arrest-smiling By his own admission, he was arrested for BOP, not for not smiling. You found the other one yet? Ys i have as your been lazzy http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/henryporter/2009/jul/16/photography-police-_iew-delete-images " kin eck Kenny, bet you wish you could find a good shag as quickly eh? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did. Look them up if you wish. They're YOUR examples. The least you can do is cite your authority. well there on of them we meet you half way. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/aug/08/olympics-spectator-parkinsons-arrest-smiling By his own admission, he was arrested for BOP, not for not smiling. You found the other one yet? Ys i have as your been lazzy http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/henryporter/2009/jul/16/photography-police-_iew-delete-images kin eck Kenny, bet you wish you could find a good shag as quickly eh?" I think we all done | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"seems threat on our freedom is at a greater risk from the police and government than it is terrorists. disgusting abuse of power in the name of anti terrorism in the news. the uk is definitely a puppet to the americans. " greenwald had my support right up to the point where he is now threatening to release more uk secrets in retaliation for his partner being stopped... that is petty..... and really does hurt any support... it is either in the public interest and they should have been released as the professional journalist he is already, or it is not.... but doing it out of spite is wrong.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They only found the knives AFTER he was arrested and searched. Knives were not the reason he was being watched. Failiure to smile and overall appearance. HAve we all got to start wearing uniforms now? Stand still for the 2 minutes hate." You, and people just like you, would be the first to complain if the knives HAD been real and the police officers had not acted quickly enough to stop an attack on a group of Olympic cyclists.... You just need a reason to whinge and moan about authority.....any reason will do. Unfortunately you can't have it both ways...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They only found the knives AFTER he was arrested and searched. Knives were not the reason he was being watched. Failiure to smile and overall appearance. HAve we all got to start wearing uniforms now? Stand still for the 2 minutes hate." what on earth was he doing carrying knives in the first place..... they have only been on the "not allowed to carry" list for the last... erm.... 11 years!!!! the only issue I had was they kept him under anti-terror legislation which was obviously wrong and a missue of power... had they detained him under lets say, the offical secrets act, which they could have had suspicions on since greenwald said he had uk secrets... and the person he was going to berlin to visit was the film maker greenwald is working with... then you could see why he would be stopped (as he could have been used as person carrying sensitive information) and why they would confiscate camera films and video equipment....... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would sooner have nine hours taken out my life than them miss a terrorist attack potentionly killing hundreds. I'm sure anyone would prefer to be detained for nine hours rather than 9/11 happening" I would sooner live in a world where neither happened. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How many people on here have been stopped under antiterror laws? We're a good cross section of the public. Must be loads according to our SWP subscribers." I can't cite authorities but you frequently hear of parents being investigated under RIPA for, gawds sake, taking their children to the "wrong" school. Admittedly, much reduced under the current Govt. Not sure any have been arrested, indeed why should they, but once the first is, the floodgates could open? Is that not a little worrying. What is more frightening is that in passing that legislation and it being pointed out what the law could be used for, the politicians said "oh noes, we would never use it for such purpose" ie tall photographers, school kids, but they do. Do you trust the Politicians? Clegg, who sold his parties principles down the river for a shot at power? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh no one. Says it all really." bet I have been "stopped and searched" more that you though....... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you suffered then under this Adrian. Can you give us tiny details how?" I just read, listen to others, think and learn. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I disagree it all started with do gooders and politically correctness as well as the usual anarchists , still there will be no complaints when sharia law is introduced one day " Just when you thought the debate couldn't get any more ridiculous.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You probably have. You implyinmg it's a race thing?" no... what I am saying is that it is very easy to comment and be bold/brashy without going thru a similar experience....... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I disagree it all started with do gooders and politically correctness as well as the usual anarchists , still there will be no complaints when sharia law is introduced one day Just when you thought the debate couldn't get any more ridiculous...." Stick around. Before long word'll get out about Newsnight, the Berlin connection and the boyfriend's rant. An' it's no' even Thursday | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've been searched countless times at football matches. Doesn't bother me. I'm always ok." if that is your answer you can tell you have never been "stopped and searched" trust me... its more than just the football patdown | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Police state how ridiculous !!!!!! The press are only interested in a story !!!! How many times do you hear the suspect say I'm innocent !!!! I will clear my name , police this police that. Just look at the jimmy Saville thing going on , all have protested their innocence even Stuart Hall until the evidence hit him in the face. Every day the police are trying to do a difficult job. Nobody reports on anything they do well, from finding lost children, solving horrendous crimes and locking up the scum of this country!!!! Oh let's all whine cause I got a speeding ticket!!! Or parked illegally. It's because the police have been to tolerant of petty crime that this country is in the state it is. Try living abroad where the police have no discretion !!!! When the next atrocity takes place and it will come the police will be there as usual picking up the pieces!!!!! The politicians politicised the police because they want control The uk police are not perfect but still the best in the world. " Don't know about "best in the world" but I agree with your sentiment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If one has nothing to hide, one has nothing to worry. " ................ There WAS a time that was true. No longer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If one has nothing to hide, one has nothing to worry. Please immigrate and live somewhere else if one dislike this country for what it is worth! " emigrate not immigrate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If one has nothing to hide, one has nothing to worry. Please immigrate and live somewhere else if one dislike this country for what it is worth! emigrate not immigrate " Or migrate? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They only found the knives AFTER he was arrested and searched. Knives were not the reason he was being watched. Failiure to smile and overall appearance. HAve we all got to start wearing uniforms now? Stand still for the 2 minutes hate. You, and people just like you, would be the first to complain if the knives HAD been real and the police officers had not acted quickly enough to stop an attack on a group of Olympic cyclists.... You just need a reason to whinge and moan about authority.....any reason will do. Unfortunately you can't have it both ways......" Tell me, what is an "acceptable" way to dress then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The sooner every baby is micro chipped the sooner we will be safe." Safe from who? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They only found the knives AFTER he was arrested and searched. Knives were not the reason he was being watched. Failiure to smile and overall appearance. HAve we all got to start wearing uniforms now? Stand still for the 2 minutes hate. what on earth was he doing carrying knives in the first place..... they have only been on the "not allowed to carry" list for the last... erm.... 11 years!!!! the only issue I had was they kept him under anti-terror legislation which was obviously wrong and a missue of power... had they detained him under lets say, the offical secrets act, which they could have had suspicions on since greenwald said he had uk secrets... and the person he was going to berlin to visit was the film maker greenwald is working with... then you could see why he would be stopped (as he could have been used as person carrying sensitive information) and why they would confiscate camera films and video equipment......." Rubber knives!!! I don't think the home office legislated for them. And they were not found until he had been arrested and searched. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The police are no longer to be trusted. They think they are here to serve the state. They are not: they are here to serve the populace. It is a crucial distinction. We are a democracy - we citizens are entitled to information about that democracy. People with power try to deny us that information - and the police pile in to back the rulers. The laws they cite were enacted to prevent terrorism - not to prevent embarrassment to a govt. The police should be ashamed." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Police state how ridiculous !!!!!! The press are only interested in a story !!!! How many times do you hear the suspect say I'm innocent !!!! I will clear my name , police this police that. Just look at the jimmy Saville thing going on , all have protested their innocence even Stuart Hall until the evidence hit him in the face. Every day the police are trying to do a difficult job. Nobody reports on anything they do well, from finding lost children, solving horrendous crimes and locking up the scum of this country!!!! Oh let's all whine cause I got a speeding ticket!!! Or parked illegally. It's because the police have been to tolerant of petty crime that this country is in the state it is. Try living abroad where the police have no discretion !!!! When the next atrocity takes place and it will come the police will be there as usual picking up the pieces!!!!! The politicians politicised the police because they want control The uk police are not perfect but still the best in the world. " Bugger me, and I thought it was their (rather well paid) job to find lost children, investigate robberies etc. Nobody MADE them do it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How many people on here have been stopped under antiterror laws? We're a good cross section of the public. Must be loads according to our SWP subscribers. I can't cite authorities but you frequently hear of parents being investigated under RIPA for, gawds sake, taking their children to the "wrong" school. Admittedly, much reduced under the current Govt. Not sure any have been arrested, indeed why should they, but once the first is, the floodgates could open? Is that not a little worrying. What is more frightening is that in passing that legislation and it being pointed out what the law could be used for, the politicians said "oh noes, we would never use it for such purpose" ie tall photographers, school kids, but they do. Do you trust the Politicians? Clegg, who sold his parties principles down the river for a shot at power?" Softly softly catchy monkey | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If one has nothing to hide, one has nothing to worry. Please immigrate and live somewhere else if one dislike this country for what it is worth! " I have nothing to hide....now. Neither have you. Just wait till our private sexual activities are not private anymore. Do you want your membership to a swingers site and all the details therein being read out in court one day? Oh of course that can never happen....can it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You clearly missed he point !!!!!! Nobody highlights their good work Only negative comments like Nobody made them do it !!!!!!! " I go to work every day, and I don't expect a pat on the head and to be told what a good job I am doing. I get a pay packet, isn't that enough for some people? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Let's keep it in proportion.He wasn't beaten,was fed and watered and is now back home.Pussy Riot?Now define aPolice State." The main point is WHY was he picked up. For looking a bit "iffy"? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The police don't look for a pat on the head , just recognition that not all they do is wrong!!L How do you know that you do a good job!!!!!" Otherwise I would be sacked. If they want recognition, volunteer for a charity or something. Otherwise they should stop expecting to be "recognised" and take their money (and plenty of overtime with all the protests about to start) and their bloody good pensions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think the two police women recently murdered are benefiting from a "bloody good pension"." As I said, nobody made them join up. They are made fully aware of the dangers that they may have to face. Same as the Army (which I was in). You volunteer to face this stuff for money. If people had to do it as a National Service, I would have every sympathy for them. Take the rough with the smooth. They don't seem to mind beating the shit out of non-violent protesters. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No,for his support of someone wanted for an illegal act" So they detained him under the terrorism act... thin end of the wedge? His partner is a whistle blower and American, If he hasn't sign the british official secrets act than he hasn't broken any laws in this country. Wasn't so long ago that homosexual acts were illegal, laws are not always morally correct. There are lots of good police officers. Lots of police officers are cunts. Both true statements unlike lots of police statements. The police need to be seen to be whiter than white. When they are not they should be rooted out and got rid of rapidly, but they are not. To many cover ups and bent coppers. There are plenty of cases that can be named where the police have covered up for each other or have lied, changed statements etc etc. If you don't question any of their actions and blindly say 'oh well there a good bunch overall' that is giving them licence to do whatever they feel they want to do. It is our right in a supposedly democratic nation to question their acts though. I don't think we're living in a police state, I do think a lot of people see the police through rose tinted spectacles though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are these _iews based on fact, fiction , opinion or from personal experience ?" If your post is aimed at me... fact opinion and personal experience and you don't have to look far to find the facts. If we are as a society going to employ a people to enforce the laws, then surely they must abide to the letter of the law. When they are found to be abusing this position then they must be removed from that position. The only fiction is that some people already believe the police can do no wrong... As far as the police are concerned it is not good enough to say, yeah but no but most of them are ok... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The sooner every baby is micro chipped the sooner we will be safe." How do You work that one out? Safe how? Because they can be tracked, have their biometric details downloaded? RFIDs will be the next step. And a lot of you willingly be tagged. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Abi, I think the police service is scrutinised massively. Any misdemeanor, failing, bad press or ill founded decision is jumped upon by media and those who simply dislike authoritarian posts. The service makes many mistakes, but through challenging it evolves. It faces many difficult scenarios and decisions that by their very nature will leave people disgruntled. When dealing with people, everything is subjective, so an assumption that a police officer lies is based on the fact that maybe they saw things differently to another. Have police officers lied, been corrupt, or been c##ts as you put it ? Yes a cross section have. Does the police service evolve & try and become altruistic and whiter than white ? It will never get there but its not perfect. It will however progress and try. Please don't infer I'm a liar and a c#nt without knowing me, its not a pleasant thing to do. " Sorry officer... I did say not all are, but some are. I know it's not a perfect world but the police do seem to be slow on the uptake when it comes to dealing with the bad apples within their own ranks. It only takes a small percentage to tarnish the rest, especially when they are not dealt with effectively. I don't want to start naming specific cases because we'll get the 'your not dragging that up again are you' comments. I know enough criminals to know how hard it is to prove a case in a court of law and the onus is on the proof of guilt. When a misdemeanor, failing or ill founded decision results in innocent people being injured, imprisoned or even killed then it should be jumped upon in the case of certain occupations. It just seems that the police protect their own, rather than rooting out the wrong doers, thus enabling them to continue to abuse their position of power. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The sooner every baby is micro chipped the sooner we will be safe. How do You work that one out? Safe how? Because they can be tracked, have their biometric details downloaded? RFIDs will be the next step. And a lot of you willingly be tagged. " I honestly think his comment was said in Jest, with the backlash generated when the government brings up the compulsory ID card idea do you really think we would allow ourselves to be chipped.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Cousteau. A point re Fabio(nice fella by the way)maybe a suspected/wanted crimnal's profile was of a young black man. Would you expect the police to stop white males just to keep figures even? Oh and Fabio I was taken to a private room at Zurich airport and searched.Did I mind? No. Why would I? " No I wouldn't, I'm not sure I understand the point you're making either ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"UK police have been following the road to corruption and politicisation for many years now. It started with 'New' Labour who saw them as a bastion of traditionalism. Of course, the career aspirants among the police lapped it up and will parrot anything if it will wn them promotion. The country is the worst for it." very true. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kennyuk2 With respect if you spoke English the way you write it he may not have understood you correctly." So your saying it is okay to treat non British people that way then? Because he cannot understand them! That is racist, which is against the law. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kennyuk2 With respect if you spoke English the way you write it he may not have understood you correctly. So your saying it is okay to treat non British people that way then? Because he cannot understand them! That is racist, which is against the law. " I doubt that was what he was saying! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Cousteau. A point re Fabio(nice fella by the way)maybe a suspected/wanted crimnal's profile was of a young black man. Would you expect the police to stop white males just to keep figures even? Oh and Fabio I was taken to a private room at Zurich airport and searched.Did I mind? No. Why would I? " You may have been searched in Zurich airport, once. Would you feel the same way if you were searched every time you went through Zurich airport? Nobody minds being stopped for a quick search occasionally, but when it becomes almost a frequent occurrence then it may seem as if you are being singled out for 'special attention' So back to to subject the authorities have stopped, searched detained for 9 hours and seized personal property of someone who is a known associate of an American whistle-blower. Using anti terrorism laws. Does one search and detention equal harassment? Are they using they laws to send a message via a known associate. Would this case have been denounced so publicly if he hadn't been a journalist? Just over 25000 people have been detained using the anti terror laws, less than 50 of these people have been charged under the anti terror laws. It is a weird one, damned if they do and he is innocent, damned if they don't and he isn't so innocent. Many years ago downloaded the terrorist cookbook, doing so is now illegal. Information is now illegal. It used to be acting on that information was illegal. I have an inquisitive mind, I would never have attempted to build any of the devices as I like my fingers, most people have the ingredients to build a device in the kitchens and garden sheds it isn't difficult and it was something I was aware of before I got banned from the chemistry lab as a schoolchild... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"UK police have been following the road to corruption and politicisation for many years now. It started with 'New' Labour who saw them as a bastion of traditionalism. Of course, the career aspirants among the police lapped it up and will parrot anything if it will wn them promotion. The country is the worst for it.very true. " Started with New Labour? Maggie didn't use them as a paramilitary force against the Miners then... Paid them triple time to do it to, A school friend's dad was there and loved the overtime payments, this was the same policeman that supplied his son with a printout of the criminal record of another pupils father for sexually abusing his daughter... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Cousteau. A point re Fabio(nice fella by the way)maybe a suspected/wanted crimnal's profile was of a young black man. Would you expect the police to stop white males just to keep figures even? Oh and Fabio I was taken to a private room at Zurich airport and searched.Did I mind? No. Why would I? You may have been searched in Zurich airport, once. Would you feel the same way if you were searched every time you went through Zurich airport? Nobody minds being stopped for a quick search occasionally, but when it becomes almost a frequent occurrence then it may seem as if you are being singled out for 'special attention' So back to to subject the authorities have stopped, searched detained for 9 hours and seized personal property of someone who is a known associate of an American whistle-blower. Using anti terrorism laws. Does one search and detention equal harassment? Are they using they laws to send a message via a known associate. Would this case have been denounced so publicly if he hadn't been a journalist? Just over 25000 people have been detained using the anti terror laws, less than 50 of these people have been charged under the anti terror laws. It is a weird one, damned if they do and he is innocent, damned if they don't and he isn't so innocent. Many years ago downloaded the terrorist cookbook, doing so is now illegal. Information is now illegal. It used to be acting on that information was illegal. I have an inquisitive mind, I would never have attempted to build any of the devices as I like my fingers, most people have the ingredients to build a device in the kitchens and garden sheds it isn't difficult and it was something I was aware of before I got banned from the chemistry lab as a schoolchild..." You can still get the 'jolly rogers cookbook' online if you know where to look I had it on 3 floppy discs years ago. Not that it's much use since it's mainly American. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"ps. Yes some information should be illegal.How to make kiddie porn.How to cook crystal meth.Would you make this freely available then? And why any sane person would download the terrorists' cookbook is, quite, frankly beyond me." Never been a teenager before? Never wanted to make your own little M-80 like Americans use? And, "I'm not insane, my mother had me tested" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Cousteau. is _abio stopped every day? I doubt it. As I have only been to Zurich airport I have actually stopped every time. What it bother me 100 yimes out of 100? Not really. never smuggle or do anything illegal for them to nick me.Might moan if I missed my last fag but that's it. " Its a complex issue my friend. I used Fabio as an example as he cited being stopped.(hope you don't mind Fabio) Stop & search is a useful power for combatting and preventing crime. Tact 2000 is also useful. I'm offering a balanced opinion that we use those powers where appropriate in a justified,llegitimate, proportionate manner. I use those powers, but as has been discussed, I don't wish to utilise them to achieve political aims or to assist another's promotion cv. Its a complex subject, and so many people will feel differently about it depending on personal experiences. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Abi.If you can prove the copper passed that info on you can go to The Guardian.Your Mp etc. I trust this has been done." It was about 27 years ago... The lad had the printout of the record and showed it around, so there is no evidence. All the information is out there on the internet if you so desire it. Acting on the information as in making crystal meth should be illegal but you cannot undo knowledge, it is known how to make it and always will be. As to your reference to child pornography, if someone chooses to make that sort of recording I'd have hardly thought they would need instruction for it. As to why I would download the cookbook as I said before inquisitive mind. I heard about it and wanted to see it. Knowing something and doing something are two completely different things and you can't un-invent something. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Abi.If you can prove the copper passed that info on you can go to The Guardian.Your Mp etc. I trust this has been done. It was about 27 years ago... The lad had the printout of the record and showed it around, so there is no evidence. All the information is out there on the internet if you so desire it. Acting on the information as in making crystal meth should be illegal but you cannot undo knowledge, it is known how to make it and always will be. As to your reference to child pornography, if someone chooses to make that sort of recording I'd have hardly thought they would need instruction for it. As to why I would download the cookbook as I said before inquisitive mind. I heard about it and wanted to see it. Knowing something and doing something are two completely different things and you can't un-invent something. " This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this fuss over being locked up for 9 hours. It's happened to most of us during our holiday abroad, Only they call it Time Share Presentions" phew light relief on this thread at last. I was held by them too. This is a time share state. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this fuss over being locked up for 9 hours. It's happened to most of us during our holiday abroad, Only they call it Time Share Presentions phew light relief on this thread at last. I was held by them too. This is a time share state." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Cousteau. is _abio stopped every day? I doubt it. As I have only been to Zurich airport I have actually stopped every time. What it bother me 100 yimes out of 100? Not really. never smuggle or do anything illegal for them to nick me.Might moan if I missed my last fag but that's it. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fabio was just an example I imagine.. Now I'm not privy to the statistics in this country, but i recently read that in the States the police have a 'stop and frisk' power which sounds similar.. Evidence shows that a black or latino man is much more likely to stopped by the police and searched for drugs..than a white man by a very large degree. Is that fair? Is the profile of a drug pusher or user black or latino? The prison population - in particular those committing non-violent drug offences - indicates this is true, as black and latino men are massively over represented. However, the Centre for Disease Control's own research suggests that in fact white men are just as likely to be carrying drugs as black men (and in some age groups more so), but are far less likely to be stopped and searched..and thus caught. Also only a small percentage of all those black or latino men who have been stopped are actually charged. It appears you're virtually expected to be guilty of that particular crime if you fit a particular profile, despite evidence to the contrary. Of course, hyperbole is being used by those proclaiming we live in a police state...I think it's a case that some people are simply a little suspicious when the state within which they reside watches its citizens so very closely, for fear of there being a tipping point. I think a little sensible, collective vigilance is wise, particularly as the state is accountable to the citizens it is watching over. Perhaps I'm too cynical, but I don't expect each successive leadership to be benevolent and have noble intentions...so checks and balances are necessary...especially when it concerns groups of people who so much authority over us and so much of our trust in them...as any abuse of this authority or breaking of this trust can be so very damaging to the very foundations of the system we hold onto so dearly. Cousteau. is _abio stopped every day? I doubt it. As I have only been to Zurich airport I have actually stopped every time. What it bother me 100 yimes out of 100? Not really. never smuggle or do anything illegal for them to nick me.Might moan if I missed my last fag but that's it. " you can't really use the states as an example since they seem to pick and choose what they enforce. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Isn't that the thin end of the wedge to a police state?" I've visited a police state. The UK is not even close. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Isn't that the thin end of the wedge to a police state? I've visited a police state. The UK is not even close." I've already said we are not a police state, we are however the most watched nation in terms of cctv coverage. It doesn't seem to reduce crime either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Isn't that the thin end of the wedge to a police state? I've visited a police state. The UK is not even close. I've already said we are not a police state, we are however the most watched nation in terms of cctv coverage. It doesn't seem to reduce crime either." It makes good TV programmes though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Isn't that the thin end of the wedge to a police state? I've visited a police state. The UK is not even close. I've already said we are not a police state, we are however the most watched nation in terms of cctv coverage. It doesn't seem to reduce crime either." My town has lots of cameras. It's a double edged sword. Sometimes you Just wanna get your ass out in the fountain but you can't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" you can't really use the states as an example since they seem to pick and choose what they enforce." It was just an example though designed to illustrate unfairness and injustice by an institution that is expected to defend people from such acts and also to highlight how it (in this instance at least) mirrors closely what happens here. We in the UK similarly and disproportionately profile minorities for offences related to drugs, when there isn't necessarily the evidence that they are more likely to commit such offences. I.e. there is no special reason to pick on a black man and search him for drugs (9-37 times, depending on the research you read) more often than a white man. Anyway...the MAIN thrust of the argument is that we ought to be sensibly vigilant because the abuses of power that various states (including our own) have historically committed, teach us to be... There are certain alarming events of global proportions that involve our own government...of that there is no denying (some have been mentioned a few posts up). To simply dismiss those people that show educated concerns is naive. As is the expectation that a government will always naturally be benevolent as if only such people are ever drawn to such positions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" you can't really use the states as an example since they seem to pick and choose what they enforce. It was just an example though designed to illustrate unfairness and injustice by an institution that is expected to defend people from such acts and also to highlight how it (in this instance at least) mirrors closely what happens here. We in the UK similarly and disproportionately profile minorities for offences related to drugs, when there isn't necessarily the evidence that they are more likely to commit such offences. I.e. there is no special reason to pick on a black man and search him for drugs (9-37 times, depending on the research you read) more often than a white man. Anyway...the MAIN thrust of the argument is that we ought to be sensibly vigilant because the abuses of power that various states (including our own) have historically committed, teach us to be... There are certain alarming events of global proportions that involve our own government...of that there is no denying (some have been mentioned a few posts up). To simply dismiss those people that show educated concerns is naive. As is the expectation that a government will always naturally be benevolent as if only such people are ever drawn to such positions. " Yeah but some people just won't listen and dismiss said ideas straight out | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" you can't really use the states as an example since they seem to pick and choose what they enforce. It was just an example though designed to illustrate unfairness and injustice by an institution that is expected to defend people from such acts and also to highlight how it (in this instance at least) mirrors closely what happens here. We in the UK similarly and disproportionately profile minorities for offences related to drugs, when there isn't necessarily the evidence that they are more likely to commit such offences. I.e. there is no special reason to pick on a black man and search him for drugs (9-37 times, depending on the research you read) more often than a white man. Anyway...the MAIN thrust of the argument is that we ought to be sensibly vigilant because the abuses of power that various states (including our own) have historically committed, teach us to be... There are certain alarming events of global proportions that involve our own government...of that there is no denying (some have been mentioned a few posts up). To simply dismiss those people that show educated concerns is naive. As is the expectation that a government will always naturally be benevolent as if only such people are ever drawn to such positions. Yeah but some people just won't listen and dismiss said ideas straight out " Kinda like when someone dismisses an example of unfair racial profiling by the state because the example refers to the US, even though it was mentioned that the UK appears to have adopted a similar policy when exercising stop and search here? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Authoritarian regimes always promise security over freedom and it is alluring to the weak-minded. But if you accept it you soon find you have neither." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"CCTV deosn't stop crime? hahaha. Ask any foorball hooligan why they don't fight in the grounds now? Forget seating,forget segregation as the main obstacles to a mass scrap,ask any real footy hooligan and it's the cameras that can cover and record every single part of the ground. Don't believe me? Read any football hooligan (by those actually there) book." More the intel gathered, shared then acted apon. Little wonder. hoodies and scarves are de riguer for those who wish to casue strife. Retina scans are not always accurate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you just did. no he did not try reading the new from time to time. I would post a link to them but i think you cannot post links on FAB" Was it in the Sunday sport, do not believe everything you read in the newspapers or the internet | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Read the hooly lit" Thorstoll. Written by those who did it.Over 700 looters arrested in Bham(over 90% convicted) after using cctv evidence in the murder riots 2 years ago.CCTV helps to prevent and detect crime dependent on circumstances. " CCTV prevents, deters and helps investigate crime , I feel safer in an area of camera coverage than one where there is none. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"CCTV can be useful in proving innocence also." True, I think some people are far to sensitive regarding CCTV, it's not there to spy on people who have nothing to hide, it's a genuine way to help deter and solve crime. Most recent serious crimes have been solved with the help of CCTV. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" CCTV prevents, deters and helps investigate crime , I feel safer in an area of camera coverage than one where there is none. " Ultimately, that's the point...and that's why CCTV is here to stay. So long as people 'feel' safer and certain instances of crime have been shown to have been tackled with the aid of CCTV (thereby proving its has been useful at times), they will not need or wish to analyse the actual overall efficacy of such surveillance methods, even if independent or state commissioned studies into the effectiveness of cameras to deter and/or reduce crime indicate otherwise. Similarly, racial profiling will continue and ethnic minorities will be stopped at a higher rate despite no evidence to suggest that they're more likely to have drugs in their possession. It'll be interesting to see how well the continued privatisation of prisons does... Ultimately it remains to be seen how benevolent our government remains as its power over its citizens slowly increase...or are despotic regimes a thing of the past in the post modern developed world we inhabit... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Police, CCTV, and Customs, they can please themselves how often they stop me. I don't give a dam I have nothing to hide " The trouble is, if you don't question certain things, your civil liberties become more eroded over time and one day you realise you're on the other side of the line and you're completely non-plussed as to how it happened (but you can ponder it from your cell, you'll have plenty of time) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"quotes 'im doing nothing wrong,so whats the problem of surveillance' is totally missing the point you wouldnt like someone peering into your house every night,or reading all your mail. ..................." Well, the trouble is you MIGHT. If, for example, you were getting poison pen letters or jiffy bags containing white powder through the post, you might be very glad someone was peering into your house on a regular basis or reading your mail. Everyone objects to the 'authorities' seemingly overstepping the mark in some matters yet reserves the right to descend upon them from the top of the rigging when they appear not to be doing enough to correct whatever's bothering folk at any given time. Alan Rushbridger, usually an articulate guy, was left coughing and spluttering when trying to explain why David Miranda should have had what amounts to Diplomatic Immunity whilst passing through Heathrow, simply because he's a journalist's boyfriend. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"seems threat on our freedom is at a greater risk from the police and government than it is terrorists. disgusting abuse of power in the name of anti terrorism in the news. the uk is definitely a puppet to the americans. " I think it might be good for you to spend some time living in a real police state and then return and see if you still think the same | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"........... the uk is definitely a puppet to the americans. ............. " They've never really allowed us to forget that, without their help, we'd have lost WWII. BTW. They never will. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"........... the uk is definitely a puppet to the americans. ............. They've never really allowed us to forget that, without their help, we'd have lost WWII. BTW. They never will." Didn't they do all the work hence winning? No? well they seem to act that way. But people forget Russia. Without them it'd have been a different story | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You tell me where in any profession there are no bad apples and that includes government, the clergy and every part of the public and private sector!!!, Also you tell me where any other body rigorously deals wit complaints no matter how false of petty. Also tell me of any other profession where bad apples are taken to task and sacked or as diverse and understanding as the UK police. The police no longer look after their own and I can assure you that. Professional standards departments that investigate police use covert surveillance and technology and their methods are not far short of MI5 in catching bad apples. Unfortunately the police are recruited and reflect society and that's where the problem stems from. I have an extensive knowledge and experience of the police and the majority are normal decent people!!!! Its just that a huge section of society don't like their thieving , drug fuelled , chav, antisocial , benefit driven lifestyles interfered with that's why they hate the police!!!!!! " and what would all the revolutionary types replace it with anyway ? Their own police force ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Police, CCTV, and Customs, they can please themselves how often they stop me. I don't give a dam I have nothing to hide The trouble is, if you don't question certain things, your civil liberties become more eroded over time and one day you realise you're on the other side of the line and you're completely non-plussed as to how it happened (but you can ponder it from your cell, you'll have plenty of time)" is that other side the dark side | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"........... the uk is definitely a puppet to the americans. ............. They've never really allowed us to forget that, without their help, we'd have lost WWII. BTW. They never will. Didn't they do all the work hence winning? No? well they seem to act that way. But people forget Russia. Without them it'd have been a different story" Nobody forgets Russia. It's arguable that without XXXXXXXX (fill in whatever suits you) the Allies might have lost the war. Without the Yanks, there's no doubt we'd have lost. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You tell me where in any profession there are no bad apples and that includes government, the clergy and every part of the public and private sector!!!, Also you tell me where any other body rigorously deals wit complaints no matter how false of petty. Also tell me of any other profession where bad apples are taken to task and sacked or as diverse and understanding as the UK police. The police no longer look after their own and I can assure you that. Professional standards departments that investigate police use covert surveillance and technology and their methods are not far short of MI5 in catching bad apples. Unfortunately the police are recruited and reflect society and that's where the problem stems from. I have an extensive knowledge and experience of the police and the majority are normal decent people!!!! Its just that a huge section of society don't like their thieving , drug fuelled , chav, antisocial , benefit driven lifestyles interfered with that's why they hate the police!!!!!! " Perhaps they need to tighten up the selection process? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"........... the uk is definitely a puppet to the americans. ............. They've never really allowed us to forget that, without their help, we'd have lost WWII. BTW. They never will. Didn't they do all the work hence winning? No? well they seem to act that way. But people forget Russia. Without them it'd have been a different story" A big SHOUT out too to the Polish who did the bulk of the work obtaining and cracking the Enigma machines without which it would have been more difficult to defeat the Germans. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its just that a huge section of society don't like their thieving , drug fuelled , chav, antisocial , benefit driven lifestyles interfered with that's why they hate the police!!!!!! " This!..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |