FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Racial preference is kind of racist
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"sexual preference is just that sexual preference, it is not racist. " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"sexual preference is just that sexual preference, it is not racist. " but your on a sex site, your supposed to just fuck anyone who asks, didn't you know | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"sexual preference is just that sexual preference, it is not racist. " Also, someone's preference on fab may not be representative of their views in the vanilla world. People might only be looking to swing with someone different from their partner. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"sexual preference is just that sexual preference, it is not racist. " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is there something in the water today " Yup. It's a new brand of sparkling weak willed needy pussy drink. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference?" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference?" Because with the exception of being bi all those are changeable things. People can't change skin colour. I kind of get the racist element to the agreement after you can't say you find ALL members of one race sexy or unattractive because you have not met ALL members of that race. It is a fine line between preference and racism and it could be down to a simple a thing as wording. Of course no one is saying you have to fuck everyone no matter the colour if their skin but to take people on their merits rather than excluding all members if one race in one fail swoop. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is there something in the water today Yup. It's a new brand of sparkling weak willed needy pussy drink. " There was me thinking I am listening to a broken record! Must try harder | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is there something in the water today Yup. It's a new brand of sparkling weak willed needy pussy drink. There was me thinking I am listening to a broken record! Must try harder " Nope. Me too. Fab needs a mute button. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is there something in the water today Yup. It's a new brand of sparkling weak willed needy pussy drink. There was me thinking I am listening to a broken record! Must try harder Nope. Me too. Fab needs a mute button. " Nah!!! Rewind and scream if you want to go faster | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference? Because with the exception of being bi all those are changeable things. People can't change skin colour. I kind of get the racist element to the agreement after you can't say you find ALL members of one race sexy or unattractive because you have not met ALL members of that race. It is a fine line between preference and racism and it could be down to a simple a thing as wording. Of course no one is saying you have to fuck everyone no matter the colour if their skin but to take people on their merits rather than excluding all members if one race in one fail swoop. " Evie, You exclude all 49+ years olds and haven't met them all....ageist or not?? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is there something in the water today Yup. It's a new brand of sparkling weak willed needy pussy drink. There was me thinking I am listening to a broken record! Must try harder Nope. Me too. Fab needs a mute button. Nah!!! Rewind and scream if you want to go faster " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If we all took our preferences off of our profiles it'd be a frigging free for all... How would you ever know who might be worth messaging, meeting etc?! I use people's profile text and preferences to establish whether we could potentially 'click' - not sure where you'd even start without that info " So is it yayga?.... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If we all took our preferences off of our profiles it'd be a frigging free for all... How would you ever know who might be worth messaging, meeting etc?! I use people's profile text and preferences to establish whether we could potentially 'click' - not sure where you'd even start without that info So is it yayga?...." Mwuahahahaha yes! Y Y Y it's a Y sound! Grrr | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If we all took our preferences off of our profiles it'd be a frigging free for all... How would you ever know who might be worth messaging, meeting etc?! I use people's profile text and preferences to establish whether we could potentially 'click' - not sure where you'd even start without that info So is it yayga?.... Mwuahahahaha yes! Y Y Y it's a Y sound! Grrr " Lolol. I think ahem ....something else was distracting me | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is this the right thread for some pringles? " i like plain ones, cos am racist against any pringles with a different flavour...especially those sour cream ones...they expect to be treated differently, even tho they are shite..and I can safely say I've met ALL sour cream pringles | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"What a complicated read that was. However, I totally disagree with what OP is saying....preference is not racist, even if I do put it on my profile. We do not play with Bi men, I do not consider that sexist! We do not play with people over 60, that is not ageist either! Me shouting obscenities, treating people differently, giving preferable treatment because of skin colour, THAT IS RACIST. Choosing not to have sex with someone because of skin colour is not!!" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is this the right thread for some pringles? i like plain ones, cos am racist against any pringles with a different flavour...especially those sour cream ones...they expect to be treated differently, even tho they are shite..and I can safely say I've met ALL sour cream pringles" Wrong!!!! you so hav'nt met the ones ive just gobbled up! you have no idea what your talking about,pracist!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is this the right thread for some pringles? i like plain ones, cos am racist against any pringles with a different flavour...especially those sour cream ones...they expect to be treated differently, even tho they are shite..and I can safely say I've met ALL sour cream pringles Wrong!!!! you so hav'nt met the ones ive just gobbled up! you have no idea what your talking about,pracist!!" pracist...how dare u..I just dont like the way they taste and I block anyone who m-eats sour cream pringles | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is this the right thread for some pringles? i like plain ones, cos am racist against any pringles with a different flavour...especially those sour cream ones...they expect to be treated differently, even tho they are shite..and I can safely say I've met ALL sour cream pringles Wrong!!!! you so hav'nt met the ones ive just gobbled up! you have no idea what your talking about,pracist!!" Pringilist tho he may have an ism | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Bloody hell, should we all start just sleeping with who other people think we should be sleeping with, rather than what WE actually want. A bit fed up of this constant elephant in the room; racism. Can we not celebrate differences in each other, instead of constantly attempting this futile exercise of 'let's pretend that absolutely everyone is exactly the bloody same'. It shows a complete lack of imagination. " pink elephants were shunned from their species...cos the other elerphants knew they looked cuter than them.Fucking big brained dobbers! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference? Because with the exception of being bi all those are changeable things. People can't change skin colour. I kind of get the racist element to the agreement after you can't say you find ALL members of one race sexy or unattractive because you have not met ALL members of that race. It is a fine line between preference and racism and it could be down to a simple a thing as wording. Of course no one is saying you have to fuck everyone no matter the colour if their skin but to take people on their merits rather than excluding all members if one race in one fail swoop. Evie, You exclude all 49+ years olds and haven't met them all....ageist or not??" I don't exclude them because my filters aren't on. That is merely a guideline. Fact is I have met a few guys over that age because I took them on their own merit like I said | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Im sorry but i think the toilet roll beneath your chin is full " Whose??? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Im sorry but i think the toilet roll beneath your chin is full Whose???" sorry him x | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OK, Before you shoot back that I'm white and have an inferiority complex, let me say this.... I think black men are beautiful, I understand completely why anyone, of any colour would find a black man hot, many black men are hot. But here's the thing. A white person who only wants to fuck black people, let's be specific, a white woman who only wants to fuck black men, a white man who only wants to fuck a black man (are there any white guys who won't fuck a hot black woman, I can't find them) and states this on his/her profile risks doing down the men they desire with a very specific kind of insult...a very old sexualised and objectifying insult that black men have suffered for a long time. OK you may say there's lots of horny hot black men on this site that want to avail of white pussy and they dont' give a flying fuck why that white ass wants them. I agree, they are free agents, adults and they make their own decisions, they want to fuck white pussy perhaps for the very reason white pussy wants to fuck them...is that not what fabswingers is about? perhaps it is, but let me put it this way...we have date ranges, we can block people that are not an age or gender we don't want to meet, then let fabswingers block race...if you want to be contacted by white or black people exclusively, then let the system give you that option....but for profiles to overtly say that black, Asian or white people are not there thing, is, intended or not, racist. Sensually, erotically, skin colour does not change the tones and shape or our bodies, the nature of our erotic inclinations and proclivities, it does not have any bearing on the character of any of us...a TV kinky submissive beautiful black man is no different physically then a TV kinky submissive white man other then the world of difference that is their personality. So I say to all those with an erotic weakness for those racially opposite them.....ask Fabswingers to filter or just put in the work and filter with your eyes, but don't racially segregate on profiles, because, yes, it's racist." I'm a simple gal, I need spelling out to me in words of only one syllable how I, a black woman, is racist for only meeting white men? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I cannot disagree more. We all have our own preferences, whether it be hair colour / height / shape / age / colour or gender etc. It really is as simple as that. I'm sure most of us have friends or relations that we love and that fit into many of the categories mentioned above and we think nothing of it. But when it comes to the act of sex, it is unquestionable that there has to be some form of physical attraction. I truly believe that when someone specifies a colour preference, it really is no different to someone preferring a blonde over a brunette; it really is that simple and shouldn't be questioned, criticised or branded a racist." This! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"sexual preference is just that sexual preference, it is not racist. Also, someone's preference on fab may not be representative of their views in the vanilla world. People might only be looking to swing with someone different from their partner. " ...or like myself fulfilling MY fantasy without the need to justify it to people bitter at being excluded. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference?" None whatsoever! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We wont meet people with shaven heads, just a huge turn off for me, what's that classed as? " a head start | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We wont meet people with shaven heads, just a huge turn off for me, what's that classed as? " Slapist! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference? Because with the exception of being bi all those are changeable things. People can't change skin colour. I kind of get the racist element to the agreement after you can't say you find ALL members of one race sexy or unattractive because you have not met ALL members of that race. It is a fine line between preference and racism and it could be down to a simple a thing as wording. Of course no one is saying you have to fuck everyone no matter the colour if their skin but to take people on their merits rather than excluding all members if one race in one fail swoop. Evie, You exclude all 49+ years olds and haven't met them all....ageist or not??" George Clooney is 52 i bet the over 48 rule would not include him?? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference? Because with the exception of being bi all those are changeable things. People can't change skin colour. I kind of get the racist element to the agreement after you can't say you find ALL members of one race sexy or unattractive because you have not met ALL members of that race. It is a fine line between preference and racism and it could be down to a simple a thing as wording. Of course no one is saying you have to fuck everyone no matter the colour if their skin but to take people on their merits rather than excluding all members if one race in one fail swoop. Evie, You exclude all 49+ years olds and haven't met them all....ageist or not??George Clooney is 52 i bet the over 48 rule would not include him??" I don't find George Clooney attractive so the age thing is irrelevant | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference?" Because fat people or those with facial hair were never subjected to slavery or any other mistreatment for 100s of years. Its all about historical context love. Bad feelings arent just there for the sake of it | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"For the love of......stop with these threads. Seriously!" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is this the right thread for some pringles? i like plain ones, cos am racist against any pringles with a different flavour...especially those sour cream ones...they expect to be treated differently, even tho they are shite..and I can safely say I've met ALL sour cream pringles" ill try them all ........and ill have pringles too ...thank you | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Another emotive and potentially closeable thread " Mainly because most aren't mature or objective enough to have the conversation/ debate about thistopic. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Another emotive and potentially closeable thread Mainly because most aren't mature or objective enough to have the conversation/ debate about thistopic." Also because its been done, to death. Over and over and over and over. Typically these things start because someone has gotten their panties in a bunch at the fact that they have found a profile that gets them a hard-on (or a wide-on) only to find that the profile owners preferences prohibit them from ever being in with a chance. Informed, mature debate is great about almost any topic, but most of these threads just start with 'wahhh wahhh wahhh' Seriously, take your pick from the 'hot topics' - race, religion, height, weight, age, location, leaving.... For about 3 weeks now its just been incessant fucking Baaawww thread after 'woe is me thread' ending up in flame wars, falling outs and general ill feeling - all over the same handful of topics which have been flayed to death until there is simply nothing original or new left to say on it. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Another emotive and potentially closeable thread Mainly because most aren't mature or objective enough to have the conversation/ debate about thistopic. Also because its been done, to death. Over and over and over and over. Typically these things start because someone has gotten their panties in a bunch at the fact that they have found a profile that gets them a hard-on (or a wide-on) only to find that the profile owners preferences prohibit them from ever being in with a chance. Informed, mature debate is great about almost any topic, but most of these threads just start with 'wahhh wahhh wahhh' Seriously, take your pick from the 'hot topics' - race, religion, height, weight, age, location, leaving.... For about 3 weeks now its just been incessant fucking Baaawww thread after 'woe is me thread' ending up in flame wars, falling outs and general ill feeling - all over the same handful of topics which have been flayed to death until there is simply nothing original or new left to say on it. " ^ This | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OK, Before you shoot back that I'm white and have an inferiority complex, let me say this.... I think black men are beautiful, I understand completely why anyone, of any colour would find a black man hot, many black men are hot. But here's the thing. A white person who only wants to fuck black people, let's be specific, a white woman who only wants to fuck black men, a white man who only wants to fuck a black man (are there any white guys who won't fuck a hot black woman, I can't find them) and states this on his/her profile risks doing down the men they desire with a very specific kind of insult...a very old sexualised and objectifying insult that black men have suffered for a long time. OK you may say there's lots of horny hot black men on this site that want to avail of white pussy and they dont' give a flying fuck why that white ass wants them. I agree, they are free agents, adults and they make their own decisions, they want to fuck white pussy perhaps for the very reason white pussy wants to fuck them...is that not what fabswingers is about? perhaps it is, but let me put it this way...we have date ranges, we can block people that are not an age or gender we don't want to meet, then let fabswingers block race...if you want to be contacted by white or black people exclusively, then let the system give you that option....but for profiles to overtly say that black, Asian or white people are not there thing, is, intended or not, racist. Sensually, erotically, skin colour does not change the tones and shape or our bodies, the nature of our erotic inclinations and proclivities, it does not have any bearing on the character of any of us...a TV kinky submissive beautiful black man is no different physically then a TV kinky submissive white man other then the world of difference that is their personality. So I say to all those with an erotic weakness for those racially opposite them.....ask Fabswingers to filter or just put in the work and filter with your eyes, but don't racially segregate on profiles, because, yes, it's racist." pleased that you've put a lot of thought into this but its still a stupid and ridiculous conclusion | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Another emotive and potentially closeable thread Mainly because most aren't mature or objective enough to have the conversation/ debate about thistopic. Also because its been done, to death. Over and over and over and over. Typically these things start because someone has gotten their panties in a bunch at the fact that they have found a profile that gets them a hard-on (or a wide-on) only to find that the profile owners preferences prohibit them from ever being in with a chance. Informed, mature debate is great about almost any topic, but most of these threads just start with 'wahhh wahhh wahhh' Seriously, take your pick from the 'hot topics' - race, religion, height, weight, age, location, leaving.... For about 3 weeks now its just been incessant fucking Baaawww thread after 'woe is me thread' ending up in flame wars, falling outs and general ill feeling - all over the same handful of topics which have been flayed to death until there is simply nothing original or new left to say on it. " Yep!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Another emotive and potentially closeable thread Mainly because most aren't mature or objective enough to have the conversation/ debate about thistopic. Also because its been done, to death. Over and over and over and over. Typically these things start because someone has gotten their panties in a bunch at the fact that they have found a profile that gets them a hard-on (or a wide-on) only to find that the profile owners preferences prohibit them from ever being in with a chance. Informed, mature debate is great about almost any topic, but most of these threads just start with 'wahhh wahhh wahhh' Seriously, take your pick from the 'hot topics' - race, religion, height, weight, age, location, leaving.... For about 3 weeks now its just been incessant fucking Baaawww thread after 'woe is me thread' ending up in flame wars, falling outs and general ill feeling - all over the same handful of topics which have been flayed to death until there is simply nothing original or new left to say on it. " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Mainly because most aren't mature or objective enough to have the conversation/ debate about thistopic. Also because its been done, to death. Over and over and over and over. Typically these things start because someone has gotten their panties in a Informed, mature debate is great about almost any topic, but most of these threads just start with 'wahhh wahhh wahhh' Seriously, take your pick from the 'hot topics' - race, religion, height, weight, age, location, leaving.... For about 3 weeks now its just been incessant fucking Baaawww thread after 'woe is me thread' ending up in flame wars, falling outs and general ill feeling - all over the same handful of topics which have been flayed to death until there is simply nothing original or new left to say on it. " So right! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"For the love of......stop with these threads. Seriously!" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Problem is that although there may be nothing new left to say, that doesn't mean that everyone has had their say it indeed that everyone has read all the arguments. There is no doubt that some of those that put a racial preference on their profile are racists. But, it's hard to identify who they are without cross reading their posts and their rationales. However the long and short of it is. If someone is racist and you're from that racial group they dislike then why would you want to meet them anyway? " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Ok. I'm racist. Next post please. " +1 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"For goodness sake! I have stated on my profile that I only want to meet white men. I AM NOT RACIST! I do not find black or Asian men attractive, its as simple as that. It is because i dont find black willies attractive, they might be very handsome but i dont like the appearance of them. Just as men who don't like the look of my mummy tummy. Its MY preference as to who i have sex with so i can put what the bloody hell i like on my profile!!!!" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"For goodness sake! I have stated on my profile that I only want to meet white men. I AM NOT RACIST! I do not find black or Asian men attractive, its as simple as that. It is because i dont find black willies attractive, they might be very handsome but i dont like the appearance of them. Just as men who don't like the look of my mummy tummy. Its MY preference as to who i have sex with so i can put what the bloody hell i like on my profile!!!!" I like that expression of mummy tummy :D | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OK, Before you shoot back that I'm white and have an inferiority complex, let me say this.... I think black men are beautiful, I understand completely why anyone, of any colour would find a black man hot, many black men are hot. But here's the thing. A white person who only wants to fuck black people, let's be specific, a white woman who only wants to fuck black men, a white man who only wants to fuck a black man (are there any white guys who won't fuck a hot black woman, I can't find them) and states this on his/her profile risks doing down the men they desire with a very specific kind of insult...a very old sexualised and objectifying insult that black men have suffered for a long time. OK you may say there's lots of horny hot black men on this site that want to avail of white pussy and they dont' give a flying fuck why that white ass wants them. I agree, they are free agents, adults and they make their own decisions, they want to fuck white pussy perhaps for the very reason white pussy wants to fuck them...is that not what fabswingers is about? perhaps it is, but let me put it this way...we have date ranges, we can block people that are not an age or gender we don't want to meet, then let fabswingers block race...if you want to be contacted by white or black people exclusively, then let the system give you that option....but for profiles to overtly say that black, Asian or white people are not there thing, is, intended or not, racist. Sensually, erotically, skin colour does not change the tones and shape or our bodies, the nature of our erotic inclinations and proclivities, it does not have any bearing on the character of any of us...a TV kinky submissive beautiful black man is no different physically then a TV kinky submissive white man other then the world of difference that is their personality. So I say to all those with an erotic weakness for those racially opposite them.....ask Fabswingers to filter or just put in the work and filter with your eyes, but don't racially segregate on profiles, because, yes, it's racist." okay what a rant.... first of all I think my position has been well known on here for a while it is not racist and it is a sexual preference, after all, I assume you have a "type" you tend to go for.... and when you have said no to people that has been because you have a preference.... however.... it is also my preference not to be seen as someone elses "niche" .... so I tend not to be interested in people who I perceive to want me for the colour of my skin, If I feel it is a major factor.. then I walk, simple as! I am me and want people to like me for me and the things I can control, as opposed to the things that I cant... I am not interested in the black/white party thing (been, tried, felt very uncomfortable with the way people were and the way people were acting/talking) as for me it promotes something that makes me personally feel very "not happy".... some play up to stereotypes.... some shy away! you just tend to find if playing up brings a negative reaction that is when the "race card" comes out.... double edged sword..... but that is me.... so get back to you and lets play a bit of "devils advocate" say you got talking to the most gorgeous black/asian (take your pick) woman.... and whilst talking to her you find out she only plays with white guys? would you still play with her???? is she not then as "racist" as the others??? For every profile you show me that says black guys only I am betting I can show you one that says "white guys only"..... want to take me up on it??? see there has been the arguement for what basically is an "ethnic filter" going on for a while... me personally, hate it!! I would refuse to use it, I want no part of it..... I would then ask for a filter who want to use the filter, because they are probably not people I would be interested in meeting... what I have said in the past is that "some" with the way certain things are worded are probably putting off a lot of the very people they are actually trying to attract... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference? Because fat people or those with facial hair were never subjected to slavery or any other mistreatment for 100s of years. Its all about historical context love. Bad feelings arent just there for the sake of it " wtf? What your saying is people who put down on their profile that,they meet white only, no asians, blah,blah blah is subconsciously racist? what the hell has slavery and persecution of black people got to do with not being sexually attracted to a particular race?? Absolutely fuck all. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Because fat people or those with facial hair were never subjected to slavery or any other mistreatment for 100s of years. Its all about historical context love. Bad feelings arent just there for the sake of it " Oh, seriously!! you are not old enough to even remember the race problems of the 60's, let alone the 'mistreatment for 100s of years' that you speak of! Why can't you live life for today and accept that although bad stuff did happen, you can't keep beating the "white folks" over the head with it forever! And talk about patronising! 'Its all about historical context love.'.. It is all about preference. We won't meet fat people. We won't meet those with facial hair. We won't meet those under 35! We have preferences! You want to talk racist? Well, your post for one! It smacks of racism to me, but maybe that is just my take on it, but who is to say? I have heard loads of times, the term "white boy" used by black mates. Bet if I started to use "black boy" there would soon be a bust up! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Because fat people or those with facial hair were never subjected to slavery or any other mistreatment for 100s of years. Its all about historical context love. Bad feelings arent just there for the sake of it Oh, seriously!! you are not old enough to even remember the race problems of the 60's, let alone the 'mistreatment for 100s of years' that you speak of! Why can't you live life for today and accept that although bad stuff did happen, you can't keep beating the "white folks" over the head with it forever! And talk about patronising! 'Its all about historical context love.'.. It is all about preference. We won't meet fat people. We won't meet those with facial hair. We won't meet those under 35! We have preferences! You want to talk racist? Well, your post for one! It smacks of racism to me, but maybe that is just my take on it, but who is to say? I have heard loads of times, the term "white boy" used by black mates. Bet if I started to use "black boy" there would soon be a bust up! " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" I have heard loads of times, the term "white boy" used by black mates. Bet if I started to use "black boy" there would soon be a bust up! " How idiotic. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" I have heard loads of times, the term "white boy" used by black mates. Bet if I started to use "black boy" there would soon be a bust up! How idiotic." have to say absolutely agree... stunned... for that to be used as an arguement by people I actually respect is disappointing........ | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" I have heard loads of times, the term "white boy" used by black mates. Bet if I started to use "black boy" there would soon be a bust up! " I would be surprised that you had heard 'loads', think your exaggerating to make a point.. the fact that you have chosen the term 'black boy' says more about you than anything else.. the poster you refer to has his own perception based on historical and endemic fact, still prevalent within some on here today I would suggest.. what are your perceptions based on..? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference? Because fat people or those with facial hair were never subjected to slavery or any other mistreatment for 100s of years. Its all about historical context love. Bad feelings arent just there for the sake of it " What a stupid thing to say. If you actually look in to it there has actually been more white people used as slaves and were mistreated. It's just not widely known or taught. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" What a stupid thing to say. If you actually look in to it there has actually been more white people used as slaves and were mistreated. It's just not widely known or taught. " More white people? Are we talking about the same thing? I'd be interested to hear you source for this as well as how you define a white person? Also how far back in time are you going? I'll give you Stalinist Russia and nazi germany as using white slaves, but struggling to think of anywhere else that traded them in the same way? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"As much as i try not to indulge in thread whining, it is probably a good time for a mod to close this. The level of ignorance and stupidity on display in this thread is staggering to say the least. Some extremely blinkered world views....this is why topics like these are best not brought up. Mind you, its a great way to gauge those to avoid, as they inevitably end up with foot in mouth syndrome." I agree | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" What a stupid thing to say. If you actually look in to it there has actually been more white people used as slaves and were mistreated. It's just not widely known or taught. More white people? Are we talking about the same thing? I'd be interested to hear you source for this as well as how you define a white person? Also how far back in time are you going? I'll give you Stalinist Russia and nazi germany as using white slaves, but struggling to think of anywhere else that traded them in the same way?" the first slaves used in American plantations where white for starters. They where called servants rather than slaves but treat exactly the same. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Another emotive and potentially closeable thread Mainly because most aren't mature or objective enough to have the conversation/ debate about thistopic." Or not informed enough in some cases. Often using one personal experience to formulate their entire view of a subject. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" What a stupid thing to say. If you actually look in to it there has actually been more white people used as slaves and were mistreated. It's just not widely known or taught. More white people? Are we talking about the same thing? I'd be interested to hear you source for this as well as how you define a white person? Also how far back in time are you going? I'll give you Stalinist Russia and nazi germany as using white slaves, but struggling to think of anywhere else that traded them in the same way? the first slaves used in American plantations where white for starters. They where called servants rather than slaves but treat exactly the same. " that shows an interesting twist on the concept of slavery in the American south. Do you want to give me a reference for your claim there were more white people used as slaves | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" the first slaves used in American plantations where white for starters. They where called servants rather than slaves but treat exactly the same. " American history I will admit is not my strong point however are you seriously suggesting that domestic staff were treated in any way similar to slaves.. and if these white servants were, why by and large were they replaced with none white slaves.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" What a stupid thing to say. If you actually look in to it there has actually been more white people used as slaves and were mistreated. It's just not widely known or taught. More white people? Are we talking about the same thing? I'd be interested to hear you source for this as well as how you define a white person? Also how far back in time are you going? I'll give you Stalinist Russia and nazi germany as using white slaves, but struggling to think of anywhere else that traded them in the same way? the first slaves used in American plantations where white for starters. They where called servants rather than slaves but treat exactly the same. that shows an interesting twist on the concept of slavery in the American south. Do you want to give me a reference for your claim there were more white people used as slaves " I haven't got a reference to give you as this is something I had come across a few years ago while looking into something for a project I had to do. Use google wont take you long to find out it's true | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"sexual preference is just that sexual preference, it is not racist. but your on a sex site, your supposed to just fuck anyone who asks, didn't you know " NN fancy a shag | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" the first slaves used in American plantations where white for starters. They where called servants rather than slaves but treat exactly the same. American history I will admit is not my strong point however are you seriously suggesting that domestic staff were treated in any way similar to slaves.. and if these white servants were, why by and large were they replaced with none white slaves.. " No they weren't domestic staff. They were called something servants and where kept as slaves to work on the plantations. Black slaves became more common because of the anti slavery laws. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" the first slaves used in American plantations where white for starters. They where called servants rather than slaves but treat exactly the same. American history I will admit is not my strong point however are you seriously suggesting that domestic staff were treated in any way similar to slaves.. and if these white servants were, why by and large were they replaced with none white slaves.. No they weren't domestic staff. They were called something servants and where kept as slaves to work on the plantations. Black slaves became more common because of the anti slavery laws. " and probably totally pointless asking if you can refer to anything factual to support that I suspect.. think your blurring the actual meaning of slavery.. hey ho | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"ok I havnt read thro the thread since last night but how the kin 'ell did we get from sexual preference to slavery? " Exactly! Its ridiculous!!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"ok I havnt read thro the thread since last night but how the kin 'ell did we get from sexual preference to slavery? Exactly! Its ridiculous!!!" a lot of threads often stray or evolve.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" What a stupid thing to say. If you actually look in to it there has actually been more white people used as slaves and were mistreated. It's just not widely known or taught. More white people? Are we talking about the same thing? I'd be interested to hear you source for this as well as how you define a white person? Also how far back in time are you going? I'll give you Stalinist Russia and nazi germany as using white slaves, but struggling to think of anywhere else that traded them in the same way? the first slaves used in American plantations where white for starters. They where called servants rather than slaves but treat exactly the same. that shows an interesting twist on the concept of slavery in the American south. Do you want to give me a reference for your claim there were more white people used as slaves I haven't got a reference to give you as this is something I had come across a few years ago while looking into something for a project I had to do. Use google wont take you long to find out it's true" This is probably a very different conversation. Indentured servants often traded time in service for transport from Ireland to the USA or to pay off debts. The only sites I can find that support the "more whites than blacks as slaves" are by the national vanguard and white history. Both of which are quite blatantly white supremacist web sites. Prior to this there were white slaves and in absolute numbers taking Roman Empire into account there were probably more white slaves, however this mostly died out in the 1600's when it moved to be controlled by Europeans. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"ok I havnt read thro the thread since last night but how the kin 'ell did we get from sexual preference to slavery? Exactly! Its ridiculous!!! a lot of threads often stray or evolve.. " Yeah and some of the things said...well, like I said earlier, people can have their preferences and views. I'm just going to move on. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" the first slaves used in American plantations where white for starters. They where called servants rather than slaves but treat exactly the same. American history I will admit is not my strong point however are you seriously suggesting that domestic staff were treated in any way similar to slaves.. and if these white servants were, why by and large were they replaced with none white slaves.. No they weren't domestic staff. They were called something servants and where kept as slaves to work on the plantations. Black slaves became more common because of the anti slavery laws. and probably totally pointless asking if you can refer to anything factual to support that I suspect.. think your blurring the actual meaning of slavery.. hey ho" So because you aren't aware of something it's a load of rubbish. Why don't you go and look into it yourself. Have you got proof that what I am saying is wrong. No you haven't. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"ok I havnt read thro the thread since last night but how the kin 'ell did we get from sexual preference to slavery? Exactly! Its ridiculous!!! a lot of threads often stray or evolve.. Yeah and some of the things said...well, like I said earlier, people can have their preferences and views. I'm just going to move on." wait for me | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I insist on anyone I meet having a pulse, does not need to be strong or regular. Race, creed or religion does not matter to me, but I understand those that do not want to meet me for whatever reason. It is one of the advantages of living in a free country. " I'd wager that a pulse isn't always a requirement for some people on here too much? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I insist on anyone I meet having a pulse, does not need to be strong or regular. Race, creed or religion does not matter to me, but I understand those that do not want to meet me for whatever reason. It is one of the advantages of living in a free country. I'd wager that a pulse isn't always a requirement for some people on here too much? " No and that is their preference not mine | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" the first slaves used in American plantations where white for starters. They where called servants rather than slaves but treat exactly the same. American history I will admit is not my strong point however are you seriously suggesting that domestic staff were treated in any way similar to slaves.. and if these white servants were, why by and large were they replaced with none white slaves.. No they weren't domestic staff. They were called something servants and where kept as slaves to work on the plantations. Black slaves became more common because of the anti slavery laws. and probably totally pointless asking if you can refer to anything factual to support that I suspect.. think your blurring the actual meaning of slavery.. hey ho So because you aren't aware of something it's a load of rubbish. Why don't you go and look into it yourself. Have you got proof that what I am saying is wrong. No you haven't. " but neither are you by your previous posts.. it seems its ok for you to say I heard it err somewhere when I was looking into something or other.. had you given something more plausible than you did then that may have initiated a valid counter to your position.. as it stand its just he said she said.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference? Because fat people or those with facial hair were never subjected to slavery or any other mistreatment for 100s of years. Its all about historical context love. Bad feelings arent just there for the sake of it What a stupid thing to say. If you actually look in to it there has actually been more white people used as slaves and were mistreated. It's just not widely known or taught. " The entire indigenous population of Britain was enslaved by the Romans in 43AD, and again by the Normans in 1066/7. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference? Because fat people or those with facial hair were never subjected to slavery or any other mistreatment for 100s of years. Its all about historical context love. Bad feelings arent just there for the sake of it What a stupid thing to say. If you actually look in to it there has actually been more white people used as slaves and were mistreated. It's just not widely known or taught. The entire indigenous population of Britain was enslaved by the Romans in 43AD, and again by the Normans in 1066/7." If we use that as a definition then the majority of the planet were enslaved by the British when they had their empire. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Women who don't meet bi-men are homophobic, to varying degrees... I'm not suggesting tha they should be forced to, but I don't think there's much point in denying the fact either. If that's the extent of their discrimination then I think there's bigger fish to fry out there. Similarly, I think most people who explicitly seek out one racial type over another are discriminating based on supposed racial characteristics. Not necessarily consciously, and of course they shouldn't be compelled to do otherwise. But to deny that the attraction is at least partly informed by racial stereotypes is just plain silly." Is it? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is it? " Yes-one-two-three-fullstop-no-comebacks. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference? Because fat people or those with facial hair were never subjected to slavery or any other mistreatment for 100s of years. Its all about historical context love. Bad feelings arent just there for the sake of it What a stupid thing to say. If you actually look in to it there has actually been more white people used as slaves and were mistreated. It's just not widely known or taught. The entire indigenous population of Britain was enslaved by the Romans in 43AD, and again by the Normans in 1066/7." Er.......... that would be England, not Britain. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Women who don't meet bi-men are homophobic, to varying degrees... I'm not suggesting tha they should be forced to, but I don't think there's much point in denying the fact either. If that's the extent of their discrimination then I think there's bigger fish to fry out there. Similarly, I think most people who explicitly seek out one racial type over another are discriminating based on supposed racial characteristics. Not necessarily consciously, and of course they shouldn't be compelled to do otherwise. But to deny that the attraction is at least partly informed by racial stereotypes is just plain silly. Is it? " It is possible since the poster stated partly. for me attraction starts with the physical features of the face by what is known as the golden proportion. This is a geometrical formula present throughout the universe. Secondly, my own theory of a personal geometrical formula. Then my other senses kick in. Colour has very little to do with it apart from the fact their personal geometry is unlikely to map out to the same ratios as mine. So i guess I'm waiting for a black man with the golden proportion to pop along. Denzil Washington Sid errrrmmm... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" I have heard loads of times, the term "white boy" used by black mates. Bet if I started to use "black boy" there would soon be a bust up! How idiotic. have to say absolutely agree... stunned... for that to be used as an arguement by people I actually respect is disappointing........" I do have to apologise to all who took that the wrong way! I was on the hoof and about to fly out for work! Lesson learned! My mates ALL use the term white boy whatever colour they are! (yes, even the white one and me included!) That is accepted everywhere we go. I was postulating about what would happen if others heard us calling our black mates "black boy". In no way was any offence intended. Not sure how the others amongst our group would take that term.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think it's simply preferences but I can usually tell in peoples' profiles who's stating this and who's being nasty about it." Yep! Who can forget the couple that didn't meet black people, or people who met black people, and checked their verifications and verifications of the people who verified them etc and blocked them. Think it's fair to say they had issues! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think it's simply preferences but I can usually tell in peoples' profiles who's stating this and who's being nasty about it. Yep! Who can forget the couple that didn't meet black people, or people who met black people, and checked their verifications and verifications of the people who verified them etc and blocked them. Think it's fair to say they had issues! " I think profile pics of them both in big white pointy hats gave a few clues to their way of thinking too | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think it's simply preferences but I can usually tell in peoples' profiles who's stating this and who's being nasty about it. Yep! Who can forget the couple that didn't meet black people, or people who met black people, and checked their verifications and verifications of the people who verified them etc and blocked them. Think it's fair to say they had issues! I think profile pics of them both in big white pointy hats gave a few clues to their way of thinking too " I couldn't see the hats as the glare from the huge burning cross distracted me | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think it's simply preferences but I can usually tell in peoples' profiles who's stating this and who's being nasty about it. Yep! Who can forget the couple that didn't meet black people, or people who met black people, and checked their verifications and verifications of the people who verified them etc and blocked them. Think it's fair to say they had issues! " Staggering | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I can't see how refusing to meet people of a certain colour is racist but it does seem a bit short-sighted. I can't imagine not speaking to someone on a bus or a train or a plane simply because of their colour." I speak to women all the time but have no desire to get naked with one, if that makes me short sighted: guilty as charged! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I can't see how refusing to meet people of a certain colour is racist but it does seem a bit short-sighted. I can't imagine not speaking to someone on a bus or a train or a plane simply because of their colour. I speak to women all the time but have no desire to get naked with one, if that makes me short sighted: guilty as charged!" That is so sexist!! X | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think it's simply preferences but I can usually tell in peoples' profiles who's stating this and who's being nasty about it. Yep! Who can forget the couple that didn't meet black people, or people who met black people, and checked their verifications and verifications of the people who verified them etc and blocked them. Think it's fair to say they had issues! " yep... still have them blocked as they live actually near me... I remember my parting shot was to look at their verification list and think to myself "if only they knew........" actually a lot of the best of fab came out that night.... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Women who don't meet bi-men are homophobic, to varying degrees... I'm not suggesting tha they should be forced to, but I don't think there's much point in denying the fact either. If that's the extent of their discrimination then I think there's bigger fish to fry out there. Similarly, I think most people who explicitly seek out one racial type over another are discriminating based on supposed racial characteristics. Not necessarily consciously, and of course they shouldn't be compelled to do otherwise. But to deny that the attraction is at least partly informed by racial stereotypes is just plain silly." What a load of bollocks! I don't play with bi men because the ones I've met enjoy anal play with my strap on. Straight men are embarrassed and go red which I like: it excites me. Likewise I don't meet married men, not because I care if they're cheating no, but wax marks, shaved pubes and my temporary tattoo "property off Miss Vee" will take sone explaining to a wife! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is it too difficult for people to just fuck who they want to without all this shit? This is a site to meet people for sex,at no point ever will I be coerced into having sex with anyone I don't find attractive just because someone with the hump who is possibly getting no sex wants attach as ism or and ist to what other people are doing? Ill continue to enjoy what im doing with the lovely people I do it with xxx " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think it's simply preferences but I can usually tell in peoples' profiles who's stating this and who's being nasty about it. Yep! Who can forget the couple that didn't meet black people, or people who met black people, and checked their verifications and verifications of the people who verified them etc and blocked them. Think it's fair to say they had issues! I think profile pics of them both in big white pointy hats gave a few clues to their way of thinking too I couldn't see the hats as the glare from the huge burning cross distracted me" *Giggles* | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think it's simply preferences but I can usually tell in peoples' profiles who's stating this and who's being nasty about it. Yep! Who can forget the couple that didn't meet black people, or people who met black people, and checked their verifications and verifications of the people who verified them etc and blocked them. Think it's fair to say they had issues! Staggering " The forums went into meltdown that night! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I can't see how refusing to meet people of a certain colour is racist but it does seem a bit short-sighted. I can't imagine not speaking to someone on a bus or a train or a plane simply because of their colour. I speak to women all the time but have no desire to get naked with one, if that makes me short sighted: guilty as charged! That is so sexist!! X" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"sexual preference is just that sexual preference, it is not racist. but your on a sex site, your supposed to just fuck anyone who asks, didn't you know " *not sure if this is joke or not* | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is it too difficult for people to just fuck who they want to without all this shit? This is a site to meet people for sex,at no point ever will I be coerced into having sex with anyone I don't find attractive just because someone with the hump who is possibly getting no sex wants attach as ism or and ist to what other people are doing? R Ill continue to enjoy what im doing with the lovely people I do it with xxx " Amen!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OK, Before you shoot back that I'm white and have an inferiority complex, let me say this.... I think black men are beautiful, I understand completely why anyone, of any colour would find a black man hot, many black men are hot. But here's the thing. A white person who only wants to fuck black people, let's be specific, a white woman who only wants to fuck black men, a white man who only wants to fuck a black man (are there any white guys who won't fuck a hot black woman, I can't find them) and states this on his/her profile risks doing down the men they desire with a very specific kind of insult...a very old sexualised and objectifying insult that black men have suffered for a long time. OK you may say there's lots of horny hot black men on this site that want to avail of white pussy and they dont' give a flying fuck why that white ass wants them. I agree, they are free agents, adults and they make their own decisions, they want to fuck white pussy perhaps for the very reason white pussy wants to fuck them...is that not what fabswingers is about? perhaps it is, but let me put it this way...we have date ranges, we can block people that are not an age or gender we don't want to meet, then let fabswingers block race...if you want to be contacted by white or black people exclusively, then let the system give you that option....but for profiles to overtly say that black, Asian or white people are not there thing, is, intended or not, racist. Sensually, erotically, skin colour does not change the tones and shape or our bodies, the nature of our erotic inclinations and proclivities, it does not have any bearing on the character of any of us...a TV kinky submissive beautiful black man is no different physically then a TV kinky submissive white man other then the world of difference that is their personality. So I say to all those with an erotic weakness for those racially opposite them.....ask Fabswingers to filter or just put in the work and filter with your eyes, but don't racially segregate on profiles, because, yes, it's racist." Last week a discussion went on for days about exactly the same thing.Did you not look to see if it had been raised before starting the discussion? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"if someone wants to fuck a black/ white/ fat/thin/blonde/ brunette/ginger / tall / short / bald/old/young and man or woman s urely that's there choice... if you don't fit the profile ,don't get annoyed ... move on ...its a personal preference" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is it too difficult for people to just fuck who they want to without all this shit? This is a site to meet people for sex,at no point ever will I be coerced into having sex with anyone I don't find attractive just because someone with the hump who is possibly getting no sex wants attach as ism or and ist to what other people are doing? Ill continue to enjoy what im doing with the lovely people I do it with xxx " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"What a load of bollocks! I don't play with bi men because the ones I've met enjoy anal play with my strap on. Straight men are embarrassed and go red which I like: it excites me." Like a person in orthopaedic shoes, I stand corrected! I really should have said most.... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference? Because fat people or those with facial hair were never subjected to slavery or any other mistreatment for 100s of years. Its all about historical context love. Bad feelings arent just there for the sake of it What a stupid thing to say. If you actually look in to it there has actually been more white people used as slaves and were mistreated. It's just not widely known or taught. The entire indigenous population of Britain was enslaved by the Romans in 43AD, and again by the Normans in 1066/7." The reason it's not taught is because it's misleading. There's more than one type of slavery - and a fair bit more if you want to blur some boundaries - but the Atlantic slave trade was an industry - largely expanded by the British and responsible for a massive displacement of people, many of who have descendants living in this country. The regard and treatment of Africans was a whole different level of how one set of people treated another - literally regarded as less than human. Now I guess the question in the original post was whether you'd shag any of them? I would - well not just any - the fit ones of course. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i never get how its ok to not want to meet fat women, ok to not want to meet single guys, ok not to like facial hair, ok not to meet bi men, but you say you don't want to meet a certain colour and all hells breaks loose, whats the difference? Because with the exception of being bi all those are changeable things. People can't change skin colour. I kind of get the racist element to the agreement after you can't say you find ALL members of one race sexy or unattractive because you have not met ALL members of that race. It is a fine line between preference and racism and it could be down to a simple a thing as wording. Of course no one is saying you have to fuck everyone no matter the colour if their skin but to take people on their merits rather than excluding all members if one race in one fail swoop. " So people can change their age? Right.. People can make themselves hairy if they naturally aren't? Right.. People can have chisled looks if they have soft round features? Right.. Its about phyisical appearence when it comes to attractiveness.. Nothing to do with the person or their abilities | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think,just to be on the safe side,and to eradicate any doubts about racism with people's preferences. We should just let admin choose who we have sex with whilst swinging. Problem solved. Ooooooooo I hope I get a bird with Big tits,fingers crossed. " Admin has randomly picked Big Mike......enjoy your meet.....ps moobs count! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think,just to be on the safe side,and to eradicate any doubts about racism with people's preferences. We should just let admin choose who we have sex with whilst swinging. Problem solved. Ooooooooo I hope I get a bird with Big tits,fingers crossed. Admin has randomly picked Big Mike......enjoy your meet.....ps moobs count! " Do you think he'll wear stockings, | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |