Locking up some of Britain's most notorious killers for life without any prospect of release is a breach of their human rights, European judges have ruled.
This is just stupid
Here's the story... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23245254 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Locking up some of Britain's most notorious killers for life without any prospect of release is a breach of their human rights, European judges have ruled.
This is just stupid
Here's the story... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23245254"
too fucking right ....let the bastards rot......
in fack kill the cunt...what harm did the inosent people do to them..
fuck all |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Its the 'without prospect of release' part that they have said is wrong! It DOESN'T mean they will get released. It just means means a review has to be taken for parole purposes. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"Locking up some of Britain's most notorious killers for life without any prospect of release is a breach of their human rights, European judges have ruled.
This is just stupid
Here's the story... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23245254"
I have no issue with the ruling for two reasons....
full life sentence's are one not given out by judges, but by politians (the home secretary)
at no point did they say you couldn't lock people up for life, just that you can't give them no chance of getting out....
so you could do what they do in norway for example... and have parole hearings every 10 years after the term of the sentence....
or you could have a hearing after 50 years if you wanted to... and keep them in..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Locking up some of Britain's most notorious killers for life without any prospect of release is a breach of their human rights, European judges have ruled.
This is just stupid
Here's the story... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23245254"
Its a difficult one as some people repent, others would be a menace if released and more would be butchered by the public if it became known who they are. We had people on here the other day saying Brady shouldn't be allowed to move to jail so he could starve himself to death so go figure. I think each case should be assessed individually and maybe their should be some changes but not to many. After all who would want a mass murderer released into your local old folks care home. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
In 1972, twenty year old Palma de Mallorca was demanded to three hundred eighty four thousand nine hundred and twelve years of sentence for having failed to deliver letters. His crime of not delivering over four thousand letters resulted in such a huge punishment by the Spanish judiciary. This remains the longest sentence demanded so far in history.
A tad harsh methinks   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Locking up some of Britain's most notorious killers for life without any prospect of release is a breach of their human rights, European judges have ruled.
This is just stupid
Here's the story... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23245254
Its a difficult one as some people repent, others would be a menace if released and more would be butchered by the public if it became known who they are. We had people on here the other day saying Brady shouldn't be allowed to move to jail so he could starve himself to death so go figure. I think each case should be assessed individually and maybe their should be some changes but not to many. After all who would want a mass murderer released into your local old folks care home. "
Yeah. But think of the money saved in fares to Switzerland! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nnyMan
over a year ago
Glasgow |
"In 1972, twenty year old Palma de Mallorca was demanded to three hundred eighty four thousand nine hundred and twelve years of sentence for having failed to deliver letters. His crime of not delivering over four thousand letters resulted in such a huge punishment by the Spanish judiciary. This remains the longest sentence demanded so far in history.
A tad harsh methinks "
Franco at his best. Jealous of Adolf's success with the trains. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
