 |
By *icketysplits OP Woman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
You'd think they would check the company bona fides on Google!
I was a bit shocked to hear that IPSA costs £7m a year. It would be less expensive to let them all keep on fiddling their expenses. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"You'd think they would check the company bona fides on Google!
I was a bit shocked to hear that IPSA costs £7m a year. It would be less expensive to let them all keep on fiddling their expenses."
You are joking of course ???
That lot would be claiming billions if not kept an eye on. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icketysplits OP Woman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
"You'd think they would check the company bona fides on Google!
I was a bit shocked to hear that IPSA costs £7m a year. It would be less expensive to let them all keep on fiddling their expenses.
You are joking of course ???
That lot would be claiming billions if not kept an eye on."
The last scandal didn't add up to anywhere near £7m a year. The head of IPSA is paid £90k, which is more than an MP gets. I want to see them cleaned up but at £7m it's disproportionate and not even doing a good job. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The last person to enter the houses of Parliament with honest intentions was Guy Fawkes.
That lot would sell everything and claim it all back on expenses.
They want £1.5 billion to refit the the place so says it all really |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
