 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It seems no celebrity from the 70's is safe.
I still have a huge issue with people having their name splashed all over the papers until they're proven guilty... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It seems no celebrity from the 70's is safe.
I still have a huge issue with people having their name splashed all over the papers until they're proven guilty..."
I agree, I always thought, innocent until proven guilty, how can they prove one way or another after so long? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It seems no celebrity from the 70's is safe.
I still have a huge issue with people having their name splashed all over the papers until they're proven guilty...
I agree, I always thought, innocent until proven guilty, how can they prove one way or another after so long?"
It's not just that. It ruins someone's reputation, even if they're found innocent. People will label them and always suspect them of wrong doing. I was accused of something I hadn't done and cleared my name in court yet the fact I was charged and appeared in court it appears on my CRB and has caused major issues over the years... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems no celebrity from the 70's is safe.
I still have a huge issue with people having their name splashed all over the papers until they're proven guilty...
I agree, I always thought, innocent until proven guilty, how can they prove one way or another after so long?"
It is innocent until proven guilty which is why in an ideal world being named shouldn't matter, human nature being what it is though there will always be some who make their minds up before any court case. I am in two minds about naming suspects, after all murder suspects are named but it does tarnish innocent peoples lives and that can't be right or just either. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It seems no celebrity from the 70's is safe.
I still have a huge issue with people having their name splashed all over the papers until they're proven guilty...
I agree, I always thought, innocent until proven guilty, how can they prove one way or another after so long?
It's not just that. It ruins someone's reputation, even if they're found innocent. People will label them and always suspect them of wrong doing. I was accused of something I hadn't done and cleared my name in court yet the fact I was charged and appeared in court it appears on my CRB and has caused major issues over the years..."
They need to change it, it's so wrong.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I really hate this
When and if they are proved guilty - yes splash it all over and let everyone see but its getting stupid now. These people if not guilty will be tarnished with this for the rest of their lives
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It seems no celebrity from the 70's is safe.
I still have a huge issue with people having their name splashed all over the papers until they're proven guilty..."
Unfortunately, a large number of 'human beings' on this planet have become incapable of living without the filth that a certain type of media feeds them with on a regular basis and I find it has become impossible for me too to stay impartial. Once named, twice shamed has become a way of life for some!
Deplorable and sad world we live in sometimes! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
