FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Cut vs uncut

Cut vs uncut

Jump to: Newest in thread

By (user no longer on site) OP 26 weeks ago

Circumcised dick?

Au naturel?

I vote circumcised... and yeah, I'm part Jewish but that has nothing to do with it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

All I have to offer is a packet of crisps, sorry x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *bi HaiveMan 26 weeks ago
Forum Mod

Cheeseville, Somerset

I prefer to be as nature intended.

Heard all the BS 'health arguments' but it all comes down to cultural/religious bullshit, hence it's not standard in the UK and is elsewhere.

Shame mutilation of boys isn't viewed the same was as it is for girls.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *eard and TattsCouple 26 weeks ago

Cwmbran

Uncut

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *hrops56Man 26 weeks ago

Telford

Circumcised here from when I was young

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *wingnswitchCouple 26 weeks ago

NEWARK

Cut cock for Mrs. Mr has no preference but Mr is cut and it looks amazing

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *syoufindmeMan 26 weeks ago

Wolverhampton

I prefer natural, love the hood pulled back and forth, peek a boo!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *in and bare itCouple 26 weeks ago

kent

Never been with cut

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *partharmonyCouple 26 weeks ago

Ruislip

Who could possibly not prefer body parts when they have bits cut off them. Surely that's always better. We ears with lobes cut off, hands with fingers cut off. All improvements, right?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *luehairedcumslutCouple 26 weeks ago

St Neots

Circumsized

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *unlovinCouple 26 weeks ago

Midlands

Un cut , but I leave it back all the time

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"Circumcised dick?

Au naturel?

I vote circumcised... and yeah, I'm part Jewish but that has nothing to do with it."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP 26 weeks ago

Can we leave the racist/sexist comments about comparing male circumcision with torture or genital mutilation - female genital mutilation is barbaric and performed by African witch Doctor types who want to hurt women. It's NOT coparable to getting a circumcision at a hospital after birth or during a Briss.

It's a tiny bit of foreskin, done at the hospital and it keeps cocks nice and clean. I've lost count how many uncut guys "forget" to clean under the foreskin.

Yes, it used to be the norm for North Americans... hence my preference. But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?

A bit of civilised debate please.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *partharmonyCouple 26 weeks ago

Ruislip

"Can we leave the racist/sexist comments about comparing male circumcision with torture or genital mutilation - female genital mutilation is barbaric and performed by African witch Doctor types who want to hurt women. It's NOT coparable to getting a circumcision at a hospital after birth or during a Briss.

It's a tiny bit of foreskin, done at the hospital and it keeps cocks nice and clean. I've lost count how many uncut guys "forget" to clean under the foreskin.

Yes, it used to be the norm for North Americans... hence my preference. But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?

A bit of civilised debate please. "

Cutting off a perfectly healthy body part is barbaric and unnecessary. There's nothing racist or sexist about that. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

I also don't defend piercing babies' ears.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *igrating ladMan 26 weeks ago

Hertfordshire

I hope I don’t get judged but I’m cut as your see from my pictures, makes my helmet very mushroom like lol

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *hucky12Man 26 weeks ago

accrington

Cut

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *EAT..85Woman 26 weeks ago

Nottingham

I find uncut nicer to play with. I like to play with them

But in my vast experience of peni, cut ones are clearly easier to keep fresh.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *iltsTSgirlTV/TS 26 weeks ago

chichester

Cut always looks sexier if done nicely I find

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *umblefunMan 26 weeks ago

London/ South East

Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"All I have to offer is a packet of crisps, sorry x"

An empty packet of crisps, I already ate the contents when I was viewing the house in Germany or was it Belgium, or Luxembourg, or Ireland) with the attractive estate agent (she was fabulous).

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *alandNitaCouple 26 weeks ago

Scunthorpe

Shame mutilation of boys isn't viewed the same was as it is for girls. "

I totally agree!

Unless it is medically required, then it is a cosmetic surgery & should only be performed on consenting adults.

Cal

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"I hope I don’t get judged but I’m cut as your see from my pictures, makes my helmet very mushroom like lol

Uh oh, mushroom comparison is not good, makes me think of Stormy Daniels (let's just dwell on that thought...) description of Donald Trump (oh, feel sick and unclean now - ruined my earlier daydream)

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *inkyandthebrain2023Couple 26 weeks ago

Cheshire

Well im about to go from uncut to cut so this is interesting reading.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *rgasmatron1970Man 26 weeks ago

Bromley

Cut here, I would personally say it certainly makes my helmet incredibly sensitive

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *umblefunMan 26 weeks ago

London/ South East

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!"

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

If it's medically necessary, then fine, I get it but I'd rather not support genital mutilation in babies

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *uggy 555Man 26 weeks ago

Swansea

Definitely uncut

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *DGF20Man 26 weeks ago

Dublin

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation"

Same here

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ymbunnyfitCouple 26 weeks ago

East Yorkshire

My hubby was my 1st cut cock loved it so much I've never looked back. Just love the look and feel for me xx

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *atnip make me purrWoman 26 weeks ago

Reading

"I prefer to be as nature intended.

Heard all the BS 'health arguments' but it all comes down to cultural/religious bullshit, hence it's not standard in the UK and is elsewhere.

Shame mutilation of boys isn't viewed the same was as it is for girls. "

I absolutely refused to have my son cut. His father was because at that time in the USA most kids were regardless of religious affiliation. So he didn't want his son to look different from other boys in the shower. Lucky that's not true for the UK these days.

It's not the same as for girls. That is mutilation that affects their sex life forever.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *oiluvfunMan 26 weeks ago

Penrith

My cock is as Nature intended, and I’ve never had any issues with my personal hygiene. I’ll stick with what I have thank you

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *aymakerMan 26 weeks ago

London

It's a tiny bit of foreskin, done at the hospital and it keeps cocks nice and clean. I've lost count how many uncut guys "forget" to clean under the foreskin.

Yes, it used to be the norm for North Americans... hence my preference. But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?

A bit of civilised debate please. "

Well said

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP 26 weeks ago

It's a tiny bit of foreskin, done at the hospital and it keeps cocks nice and clean. I've lost count how many uncut guys "forget" to clean under the foreskin.

Yes, it used to be the norm for North Americans... hence my preference. But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?

A bit of civilised debate please.

Cutting off a perfectly healthy body part is barbaric and unnecessary. There's nothing racist or sexist about that. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

So a briss is "barbaric"?

Guess you don't have too many Jewish buddies.

Or North American ones.

And I got my ears pierced as a baby and glad of it. When I tried to get my daughter's done, I was refused. Total racist xenophobic garbage.

I also don't defend piercing babies' ears. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *chupforitMan 26 weeks ago

Peterborough

Definitely prefer uncut like mine. Love a nice foreskin between my lips.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP 26 weeks ago

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation

Same here "

It's NOT genital mutilation!

Read a book or something...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah?wprov=sfla1

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *partharmonyCouple 26 weeks ago

Ruislip

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation

Same here

It's NOT genital mutilation!

Read a book or something...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah?wprov=sfla1

If a body part doesn't need cutting off and you decide to cut it off anyway then that is the very essence of mutilation. I'm sorry if you don't like that. It would be the same if I cut off a baby's finger, toes, earlobes or anything else. It's mutilation. I'm sorry that your culture has dulled you to that fact.

This is not racist. I don't care who does it. The royals - white and privileged as they are - used to do it. It's mutilation. Is that being racist if I say the Royal family shouldn't do it?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *undee2Man 26 weeks ago

Dundee

"Circumcised dick?

Au naturel?

I vote circumcised... and yeah, I'm part Jewish but that has nothing to do with it."

Same

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP 26 weeks ago

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation

Same here

It's NOT genital mutilation!

Read a book or something...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah?wprov=sfla1

This is not racist. I don't care who does it. The royals - white and privileged as they are - used to do it. It's mutilation. Is that being racist if I say the Royal family shouldn't do it? "

Yes it is racist AND antisemitic. I don't know or care about the royals but over in Canada and the US it was routine.

Mutilation by definition is cutting off an essential part of the body.

Foreskin are NOT essential. On many cases, circumcision is medically beneficial.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *iamondsmiles.Woman 26 weeks ago

little house on the praire

Doesn't matter to me one way or another

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *anGuy4funMan 26 weeks ago

Belfast

Was cut when I was 30. Was medically needed but prefer how it looks now. On another guy would prefer cut but it ain't no deal breaker

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *imi_RougeWoman 26 weeks ago

Portsmouth

I really couldn't care less, it's not something that ever crosses my mind.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ameshertsMan 26 weeks ago

Herts

Nothing worse than a mutilated dick

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *elenshubbyMan 26 weeks ago

Uxbridge

I always had a long foreskin.

But as I got older it got tighter and tighter. Diabetes did not help.

The foreskin started to scar.

Do I had the curcumcision.

My wife thinks it looks a lot better than previously and prefers it.

There are pics of both cut and uncut on my profile

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *luehairedcumslutCouple 26 weeks ago

St Neots

"I always had a long foreskin.

But as I got older it got tighter and tighter. Diabetes did not help.

The foreskin started to scar.

Do I had the curcumcision.

My wife thinks it looks a lot better than previously and prefers it.

There are pics of both cut and uncut on my profile

Looks much better

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

I'm cut and prefer it not that I know any different lol

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *bi HaiveMan 26 weeks ago
Forum Mod

Cheeseville, Somerset

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation

Same here

It's NOT genital mutilation!

Read a book or something...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah?wprov=sfla1

This is not racist. I don't care who does it. The royals - white and privileged as they are - used to do it. It's mutilation. Is that being racist if I say the Royal family shouldn't do it?

Yes it is racist AND antisemitic. I don't know or care about the royals but over in Canada and the US it was routine.

Mutilation by definition is cutting off an essential part of the body.

Foreskin are NOT essential. On many cases, circumcision is medically beneficial.

Medical necessity is different from a choice made by parents at birth just 'because'. Surely the difference is obvious?

Two thousand years ago there were no taps in houses supplying mains water. Hygiene standards were significantly different. People are perfectly capable of maintaining hygiene without surgery now.

There's no reason now bar a specific medical need.

Babies can't consent.

And before anyone starts quoting stats on a potential reduction in penile cancer, imagine if the removal of other body parts was advocated in a similar way?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *layful HarlequinMan 26 weeks ago

iver heath

Well this SIR I sent getting knighted for anyone .!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *partharmonyCouple 26 weeks ago

Ruislip

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation

Same here

It's NOT genital mutilation!

Read a book or something...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah?wprov=sfla1

This is not racist. I don't care who does it. The royals - white and privileged as they are - used to do it. It's mutilation. Is that being racist if I say the Royal family shouldn't do it?

Yes it is racist AND antisemitic. I don't know or care about the royals but over in Canada and the US it was routine.

Mutilation by definition is cutting off an essential part of the body.

Foreskin are NOT essential. On many cases, circumcision is medically beneficial.

I think you have very narrow view of what mutilation is and strange view of what racism is.

Definition of mutilate from Google:

inflict a violent and disfiguring injury on.

If you cut off a healthy body part, including the foreskin, you are disfiguring that part of the body. Its natural state is to have it. Chopping it off because of some cultural reason disfigured it. Slicing off a body part from a defenceless baby is a violent action.

If I chopped off your ear, are you seriously telling me that wouldn't be mutilating you because it's not essential?

I have not made any exceptions in my criticism by race at all. I have universally condemned it regardless of who does it. I have criticised people of my own race (the royals), but, as you say, you don't care, I guess because it doesn't fit your narrative.

I'm well aware it is routine in America and Canada. That doesn't make it right and it doesn't make it any less mutilation.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *pandjMan 26 weeks ago

Sparkford

"Well im about to go from uncut to cut so this is interesting reading. "

I was done last October and my erect dick looked similar in your picture. I could've probably made do as it was but about one on four times of having sex it'd give me issues which would result in loss of sensation and erection.

Wish I'd got it done years ago but I'd still have my foreskin if it didn't give me issues.

If you want any advice or feedback about my experience then you are free to inbox me.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *pandjMan 26 weeks ago

Sparkford

"I always had a long foreskin.

But as I got older it got tighter and tighter. Diabetes did not help.

The foreskin started to scar.

Do I had the curcumcision.

My wife thinks it looks a lot better than previously and prefers it.

There are pics of both cut and uncut on my profile

Looks great and mine was getting tighter as I aged.

How long ago were you cut as you have some great flaring going on with your helmet

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ouple4voyeurCouple 26 weeks ago

Birmingham

Uncut 100%

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *eavilMan 26 weeks ago

Stalybridge

[Removed by poster at 30/05/24 15:06:31]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP 26 weeks ago

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation

Same here

It's NOT genital mutilation!

Read a book or something...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah?wprov=sfla1

This is not racist. I don't care who does it. The royals - white and privileged as they are - used to do it. It's mutilation. Is that being racist if I say the Royal family shouldn't do it?

Yes it is racist AND antisemitic. I don't know or care about the royals but over in Canada and the US it was routine.

Mutilation by definition is cutting off an essential part of the body.

Foreskin are NOT essential. On many cases, circumcision is medically beneficial.

Medical necessity is different from a choice made by parents at birth just 'because'. Surely the difference is obvious?

Two thousand years ago there were no taps in houses supplying mains water. Hygiene standards were significantly different. People are perfectly capable of maintaining hygiene without surgery now.

There's no reason now bar a specific medical need.

Babies can't consent.

Yeah but when my mother took me toma GP, he used a proper needle, not one of those Claire's hole-puncher things.

Piercing is best done with a professional with a needle. I had my left nostril done by a professional piercer using a surgical steel ring with niobium bead.

Hygiene is important and many parents of Mediterranean countries and far east pierce their baby girls. This is a far more hygienic solution to the dimwit at Claire's using hole punchers.

And before anyone starts quoting stats on a potential reduction in penile cancer, imagine if the removal of other body parts was advocated in a similar way?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ouples_EroticaXXXCouple 26 weeks ago

manchester

Cut, it tastes better

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP 26 weeks ago

"Cut, it tastes better "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *isntacrowdMan 26 weeks ago

Devonshire

Cut from a very young age

Which I believe has reduced my sensitivity

I think it makes me last longer which can be both a blessing and curse

But I do stand to be corrected on that as I’ve always been a round head rather than a cavalier so to speak

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ellowthread2Couple 26 weeks ago

manchester

hubby is uncut but always prefer seeing it pulled right back . so he keeps it back ?? what you think ?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation

Same here

It's NOT genital mutilation!

Read a book or something...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah?wprov=sfla1

This is not racist. I don't care who does it. The royals - white and privileged as they are - used to do it. It's mutilation. Is that being racist if I say the Royal family shouldn't do it?

Yes it is racist AND antisemitic. I don't know or care about the royals but over in Canada and the US it was routine.

Mutilation by definition is cutting off an essential part of the body.

Foreskin are NOT essential. On many cases, circumcision is medically beneficial.

I think you have very narrow view of what mutilation is and strange view of what racism is.

Definition of mutilate from Google:

inflict a violent and disfiguring injury on.

If I chopped off your ear, are you seriously telling me that wouldn't be mutilating you because it's not essential?

I'm well aware it is routine in America and Canada. That doesn't make it right and it doesn't make it any less mutilation. "

I'm guessing you're also about natural births and not cutting the placenta because the child can't decide.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *partharmonyCouple 26 weeks ago

Ruislip

[Removed by poster at 31/05/24 13:06:17]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *partharmonyCouple 26 weeks ago

Ruislip

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation

Same here

It's NOT genital mutilation!

Read a book or something...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah?wprov=sfla1

This is not racist. I don't care who does it. The royals - white and privileged as they are - used to do it. It's mutilation. Is that being racist if I say the Royal family shouldn't do it?

Yes it is racist AND antisemitic. I don't know or care about the royals but over in Canada and the US it was routine.

Mutilation by definition is cutting off an essential part of the body.

Foreskin are NOT essential. On many cases, circumcision is medically beneficial.

I think you have very narrow view of what mutilation is and strange view of what racism is.

Definition of mutilate from Google:

inflict a violent and disfiguring injury on.

If I chopped off your ear, are you seriously telling me that wouldn't be mutilating you because it's not essential?

I'm well aware it is routine in America and Canada. That doesn't make it right and it doesn't make it any less mutilation.

I'm guessing you're also about natural births and not cutting the placenta because the child can't decide."

What utterly ridiculous points pro-circ people come up with. Your comment smacks of desperation because you can't come up with a sensible defence of mutilating babies.

I'm just against cutting perfectly healthy body parts off defenceless babies. Who'd have thought that such a position would be so controversial?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *avexxMan 26 weeks ago

cheshire

half cut

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *9 Love-To-TryCouple 26 weeks ago

East Anglia

Mr is uncut but l like it pulled back

foreskin does give different options for playing with his cock

for his cages I wish he was without foreskin to enable better access in sessions

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ellowthread2Couple 26 weeks ago

manchester

"Mr is uncut but l like it pulled back

foreskin does give different options for playing with his cock

for his cages I wish he was without foreskin to enable better access in sessions "

totally agree. .

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *wiss Army KnifeMan 26 weeks ago

Second star to the right…

I am happy with my bloodhound dog look when it’s down….it’s extremely attractive when it’s like that

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *hil most chillMan 26 weeks ago

South East & Europe

The sheer frequency of this question appearing in the forum is just crazy

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *agneto.Man 26 weeks ago

Bham

Being circumcised I certainly appreciate those who do like it like that.

Has it affected my life like fgm? No, so I don't feel the two are comparable. But I'm not here to argue.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

Don't have a preference, like both, well maintained is all I'd expect.

I don't agree with parents' permanently altering children's body parts for non-medical reasons, ignoring the child's inability to consent & negating individual body autonomy. If the child grows up & as an adult wishes to do so (or anything) for a religious or cosmetic reason, that's their decision & business.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"I prefer to be as nature intended.

Heard all the BS 'health arguments' but it all comes down to cultural/religious bullshit, hence it's not standard in the UK and is elsewhere.

Shame mutilation of boys isn't viewed the same was as it is for girls. "

I'm hanging on to my foreskin as I'm a big fan. Why fix what isn't broken?

Love then on other guys too always a treat when I pull it back to expose a nice big head too suck.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

It's a tiny bit of foreskin, done at the hospital and it keeps cocks nice and clean. I've lost count how many uncut guys "forget" to clean under the foreskin.

Yes, it used to be the norm for North Americans... hence my preference. But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?

A bit of civilised debate please. "

If an adult chooses to be circumsized or for medical reasons then it's all good. But don't blame uncut people for bad hygiene as dirty people just don't wash properly anywhere.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation

Same here

It's NOT genital mutilation!

Read a book or something...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah?wprov=sfla1

This is not racist. I don't care who does it. The royals - white and privileged as they are - used to do it. It's mutilation. Is that being racist if I say the Royal family shouldn't do it?

Yes it is racist AND antisemitic. I don't know or care about the royals but over in Canada and the US it was routine.

Mutilation by definition is cutting off an essential part of the body.

Foreskin are NOT essential. On many cases, circumcision is medically beneficial.

I think you have very narrow view of what mutilation is and strange view of what racism is.

Definition of mutilate from Google:

inflict a violent and disfiguring injury on.

If I chopped off your ear, are you seriously telling me that wouldn't be mutilating you because it's not essential?

I'm well aware it is routine in America and Canada. That doesn't make it right and it doesn't make it any less mutilation.

I'm guessing you're also about natural births and not cutting the placenta because the child can't decide.

What utterly ridiculous points pro-circ people come up with. Your comment smacks of desperation because you can't come up with a sensible defence of mutilating babies.

I'm just against cutting perfectly healthy body parts off defenceless babies. Who'd have thought that such a position would be so controversial? "

These Fascist "your points are invalid because they don't fit my narrative" Antisemitism coming from someone who claims to be from a "royal race"

. You can't be any more obvious than if you were marching along whilst wearing a tiny tash and doing a salut.

There's nothing wrong with a bit of a snip here and there. We do it to hair, we do it to nails, we do it to placenta. I bet you're all antivax too because "why vaccinate someone who's healthy?"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *partharmonyCouple 26 weeks ago

Ruislip

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation

Same here

It's NOT genital mutilation!

Read a book or something...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah?wprov=sfla1

This is not racist. I don't care who does it. The royals - white and privileged as they are - used to do it. It's mutilation. Is that being racist if I say the Royal family shouldn't do it?

Yes it is racist AND antisemitic. I don't know or care about the royals but over in Canada and the US it was routine.

Mutilation by definition is cutting off an essential part of the body.

Foreskin are NOT essential. On many cases, circumcision is medically beneficial.

I think you have very narrow view of what mutilation is and strange view of what racism is.

Definition of mutilate from Google:

inflict a violent and disfiguring injury on.

If I chopped off your ear, are you seriously telling me that wouldn't be mutilating you because it's not essential?

I'm well aware it is routine in America and Canada. That doesn't make it right and it doesn't make it any less mutilation.

I'm guessing you're also about natural births and not cutting the placenta because the child can't decide.

What utterly ridiculous points pro-circ people come up with. Your comment smacks of desperation because you can't come up with a sensible defence of mutilating babies.

I'm just against cutting perfectly healthy body parts off defenceless babies. Who'd have thought that such a position would be so controversial?

These Fascist "your points are invalid because they don't fit my narrative" Antisemitism coming from someone who claims to be from a "royal race"

. You can't be any more obvious than if you were marching along whilst wearing a tiny tash and doing a salut.

There's nothing wrong with a bit of a snip here and there. We do it to hair, we do it to nails, we do it to placenta. I bet you're all antivax too because "why vaccinate someone who's healthy?""

I didn't say anything about a "royal race". You are clearly incapable of understanding things you read.

If your hair is cut, do you bleed? Does it sever nerve endings and cause irreparable changes to your body? Try coming up with something that's actually comparable. You're just showing the desperation in trying to defend chopping off body parts of babies. It's not antisemitic to say nobody should do that without proper medical need.

I am not anti vax.

Your entire argument is complete nonsense.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"I have criticised people of my own race (the royals), but, as you say, you don't care, I guess because it doesn't fit your narrative.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I am not anti vax.

Your entire argument is complete nonsense. "

You're not anti-vax? So what you're saying is that you agree with damaging acts like puncturing a baby's flawless skin and injecting a defenceless newborn with a disease that will definitely cause them to be ill, causing changes in its body, when they would otherwise have been a healthy baby? ...

*Shrugs* ...ok. I don't understand your inconsistency tbh.

I noticed you ignored the placenta bit as well. Are you against natural "lotus births"? Are you someone who is happy to slice up and sever the umbilical link between a mother and her newborn, then clamp it up at either end because it's more convenient that a tiny bit of it remains on the baby and eventually falls off?

I mean we could argue that the above is done by a doctor, so it's a medical procedure. All circumcisions in the UK are carried out by practicing doctors and so are medical procedures too. I'm guessing you're happy about that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *rsKOTCTWoman 26 weeks ago

Leeds

Couldn't care less.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"There's nothing wrong with a bit of a snip here and there. We do it to hair, we do it to nails, we do it to placenta. I bet you're all antivax too because "why vaccinate someone who's healthy?""

Absolute room temperature IQ take

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"There's nothing wrong with a bit of a snip here and there. We do it to hair, we do it to nails, we do it to placenta. I bet you're all antivax too because "why vaccinate someone who's healthy?"

Absolute room temperature IQ take"

I'll be invoking Godwin's Law soon. You're not chipping in with anything reasonable Joe?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *mileyculturebelfastMan 26 weeks ago

belfast

"Cut here, and I love it. I have a very lickable helmet!

Mine was medical when I was a kid. Not into cosmetic genital mutilation

Same here

It's NOT genital mutilation!

Read a book or something...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah?wprov=sfla1

This is not racist. I don't care who does it. The royals - white and privileged as they are - used to do it. It's mutilation. Is that being racist if I say the Royal family shouldn't do it?

Yes it is racist AND antisemitic. I don't know or care about the royals but over in Canada and the US it was routine.

Mutilation by definition is cutting off an essential part of the body.

Foreskin are NOT essential. On many cases, circumcision is medically beneficial.

Shouting racism means you've no answer. There is no reason to cut parts of a child's body off because of a fairy tale. It is wrong.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"There's nothing wrong with a bit of a snip here and there. We do it to hair, we do it to nails, we do it to placenta. I bet you're all antivax too because "why vaccinate someone who's healthy?"

Absolute room temperature IQ take

I'll be invoking Godwin's Law soon. You're not chipping in with anything reasonable Joe?"

Ironic you talk about invoking Godwin's law when literally no-one mentioned it but ok... are there pain receptors in your nails and hair when it's cut? No, and vaccinations are for preventing diseases and not in anyway similar to cutting off part of what is a healthy child. But hey, if you're all for mutilating children then I can't change your mind.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"There's nothing wrong with a bit of a snip here and there. We do it to hair, we do it to nails, we do it to placenta. I bet you're all antivax too because "why vaccinate someone who's healthy?"

Absolute room temperature IQ take

I'll be invoking Godwin's Law soon. You're not chipping in with anything reasonable Joe?

Vaccinations don't prevent disease, they reduce the risks.

Circumcisions reduce the risk of penile cancer, STDs, HIV infection and UTIs.

Over to you.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *iaisonseekerMan 26 weeks ago

Liverpool

Surely the only way to resolve this debate is through a properly conducted penile fencing tournament?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *tylebender03Man 26 weeks ago

Manchester

Ol dirty bastard raw and uncut

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *essTTWoman 26 weeks ago

Birmingham

It's a tiny bit of foreskin, done at the hospital and it keeps cocks nice and clean. I've lost count how many uncut guys "forget" to clean under the foreskin.

Yes, it used to be the norm for North Americans... hence my preference. But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?

A bit of civilised debate please. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *iddle ManMan 26 weeks ago

Walsall

Who the f isn't cleaning their dick?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *essTTWoman 26 weeks ago

Birmingham

I prefer cut but if I like someone I won't kick them out of bed over a bit of foreskin

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *essTTWoman 26 weeks ago

Birmingham

"Who the f isn't cleaning their dick? "

You would be surprised

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *partharmonyCouple 26 weeks ago

Ruislip

"There's nothing wrong with a bit of a snip here and there. We do it to hair, we do it to nails, we do it to placenta. I bet you're all antivax too because "why vaccinate someone who's healthy?"

Absolute room temperature IQ take

I'll be invoking Godwin's Law soon. You're not chipping in with anything reasonable Joe?

Vaccinations don't prevent disease, they reduce the risks.

Circumcisions reduce the risk of penile cancer, STDs, HIV infection and UTIs.

Over to you.

Penile cancer is very rare. Breast cancer is vastly more common. Does that mean we should remove the breast buds from baby girls? That would save a lot more lives. But I imagine that you would see that as immoral, but you haven't been desensitised to that.

America has the highest rate of HIV infection in the industrialised world but also the highest rate of circumcision. What does that tell you about its effectiveness? The studies that concluded circumcision reduces HIV infection have been lambasted by some scientists for being unethical and badly conducted. Condoms are a more reliable way of reducing STDs and they don't require slicing of a healthy body part from a defenceless baby.

There is very little evidence that circumcision prevents UTIs. Studies have been flawed. There is also evidence that it helps protect against them.

The American obsession with circumcision started in the 19th century as a cure for masturbation. Since then it has been touted as a cure for cancer and now it's HIV. All of these claims have been disputed. It's been a cure in search of an illness for a long time.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *lirtyfun4allMan 26 weeks ago

Torquay

Had the op 3 weeks ago for med reasons. Not back in action yet but looking forward to trying it out. All offers gratefully received ! ??

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

I prefer cut. I've had uncut, but now I wouldn't choose uncut in this lifestyle.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

I'm cut I didn't have a choice was to tight but best thing I've done

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"Vaccinations don't prevent disease, they reduce the risks.

Circumcisions reduce the risk of penile cancer, STDs, HIV infection and UTIs.

Over to you.

I'm not going to argue the merits of that as I can't source studies that that either support or deny that so I'm not going to make a sweeping statement like saying a foreskin is anything like hair and nails

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *edonisthenryMan 26 weeks ago

Cambridge

"I prefer cut. I've had uncut, but now I wouldn't choose uncut in this lifestyle."

You look very lovely. I'm circumcised by choice as an adult and looking for a lady who wants to meet a guy like me.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *aitonelMan 26 weeks ago

Travelling

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

Oh dear lord, so now it's all a conspiracy theory by Americans to combat masturbation?

Bury your heads in the sand all you want, the research is there and, at least in the case of HIV is statistically important enough to warrant mention by all the leading medica as a positive. UTIs HPVs etc - all statistically relevant results where circumcision has been a positive step. Now that's not advocating it's the best, but denying it's statistical relevance is dumb.

And yes, breasts are removed in case of cancer... Don't see what you're getting at. Breasts are also removed where familial risks of cancer are expected.

Desensitisation is awesome, I last longer, I have harder erections, it looks prettier. It's a no brainer and a win win win, unless you love your smegma and cottage cheese scented helmet. Can't deny that some do *shrugs*.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ex HolesMan 26 weeks ago

Up North

I blame Blue Peter for showing kids how to make tinfoil hats all those years ago

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *eds1Man 26 weeks ago

Salisbury

I’m uncut

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"Oh dear lord, so now it's all a conspiracy theory by Americans to combat masturbation?

And yes, breasts are removed in case of cancer... Don't see what you're getting at. Breasts are also removed where familial risks of cancer are expected.

I think that last paragraph pretty much negates anything you have to say because it's fuelled by pure ego and a need to feel better than others.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *aitonelMan 26 weeks ago

Travelling

The coping is real!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"The coping is real! "

Fancy being a little less cryptic there, buddy?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *riel13Woman 26 weeks ago

Northampton

Is that really a thing?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *aitonelMan 26 weeks ago

Travelling

"The coping is real!

Fancy being a little less cryptic there, buddy?"

The overly defensive and offended positioning on display

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *riel13Woman 26 weeks ago

Northampton

"All I have to offer is a packet of crisps, sorry x"

Oohh what flavour???

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ikki_now_n_thenTV/TS 26 weeks ago

Leicester

Doesn't really bother me, as long as it's clean!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *partharmonyCouple 26 weeks ago

Ruislip

"Oh dear lord, so now it's all a conspiracy theory by Americans to combat masturbation?

And yes, breasts are removed in case of cancer... Don't see what you're getting at. Breasts are also removed where familial risks of cancer are expected.

Explain to me how America has such a high rate if HIV when they also have such a high rate of circumcision. It doesn't seem to be working too well for the, does it? If it was so effective you would expect tgeir rates to be amongst the lowest but it is amongst the highest. It's almost as if it doesn't have the claimed effects, just like the critics of the research say.

The history of circumcision being used as a cure for masturbation is well documented. There are articles from the time about it. There's no conspiracy there.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ayd100Man 26 weeks ago

clitheroe

Who gives a fuck,as long as I can see a shiny glans to get my mouth round don't care

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"The coping is real!

Fancy being a little less cryptic there, buddy?

The overly defensive and offended positioning on display"

From which side? If you're going to have an opinion, at least say it with a bit of conviction instead of alluding to comments without actually saying anything.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"All I have to offer is a packet of crisps, sorry x

Oohh what flavour???

Cheese and Smeg..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *aitonelMan 26 weeks ago

Travelling

"The coping is real!

Fancy being a little less cryptic there, buddy?

The overly defensive and offended positioning on display

From which side? If you're going to have an opinion, at least say it with a bit of conviction instead of alluding to comments without actually saying anything."

The cut camp.

But also since pushed just to tag it on, the hilarity that (some!) women love to drop an opinion on mens body topics but would also be the first to flay (see what I did there) a man if they so much as hinted at a thought of an opinion on women's body topics.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *essTTWoman 26 weeks ago

Birmingham

"The coping is real!

Fancy being a little less cryptic there, buddy?

The overly defensive and offended positioning on display

From which side? If you're going to have an opinion, at least say it with a bit of conviction instead of alluding to comments without actually saying anything.

The cut camp.

Of course men are allowed opinions as long as they're respect. It works both ways

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *riel13Woman 26 weeks ago

Northampton

"All I have to offer is a packet of crisps, sorry x

Oohh what flavour???

Cheese and Smeg..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

I'm gonna put this one in the basket ...

https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978-92-4-000854-0

Conspiracy theory indeed. There's a hundred and sixty pages to read there if you're interested. But I'm guessing you believe you know better than the World Health Organisation, and that your research and theories are totally inconclusive.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"The coping is real!

Fancy being a little less cryptic there, buddy?

The overly defensive and offended positioning on display

From which side? If you're going to have an opinion, at least say it with a bit of conviction instead of alluding to comments without actually saying anything.

The cut camp.

That last point is actually very interesting. It's nice to see a majority of women don't care one way or the other but I hate the idea of men trying to use it get one up on each other. It's just sad.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"The coping is real!

Fancy being a little less cryptic there, buddy?

The overly defensive and offended positioning on display

From which side? If you're going to have an opinion, at least say it with a bit of conviction instead of alluding to comments without actually saying anything.

The cut camp.

That last point is actually very interesting. It's nice to see a majority of women don't care one way or the other but I hate the idea of men trying to use it get one up on each other. It's just sad."

I thought this was about the kids?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"That last point is actually very interesting. It's nice to see a majority of women don't care one way or the other but I hate the idea of men trying to use it get one up on each other. It's just sad.

I thought this was about the kids?

"Desensitisation is awesome, I last longer, I have harder erections, it looks prettier. It's a no brainer and a win win win, unless you love your smegma and cottage cheese scented helmet. Can't deny that some do *shrugs*."

This doesn't prove my point?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *cja2606Man 26 weeks ago

Birmingham

I am circumcised due to medical reasons when I was younger.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *aria_dreamgirlTV/TS 26 weeks ago

stockport

All this fuss over a little bit of skin .

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *t12guy49Man 26 weeks ago

Walton-on-Thames

Had to be circumcised 5 years ago for health reasons. I wish I had done it years ago

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

Nearly all the women I’ve been with in the last ten years have said they’d prefer circumcised

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

I hate my foreskin wish I was cut

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *reakbedsnotheartsMan 26 weeks ago

bedford

Hood cut gang

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

[Removed by poster at 01/06/24 01:10:05]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

Cut! Whoop

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

Cut crew

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *hoirCouple 26 weeks ago

Clacton/Bury St. Edmunds

Definitely prefer uncut, cut makes me cringe a little cos I think I'mma hurt it

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"Definitely prefer uncut, cut makes me cringe a little cos I think I'mma hurt it

Unless you bit it it doesn’t hurt lol

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *inky_couple2020Couple 26 weeks ago

North West

There are some inaccuracies in this thread with relation to circumcision.

1) There is, and I quote from local council safeguarding literature "no requirement in law for professionals undertaking male circumcision to be medically trained or to have proven expertise. Traditionally, religious leaders or respected elders may conduct this practice."

Therefore, whoever stated earlier that in the UK, all circumcisions are carried out by doctors, is incorrect.

2) Circumcision of males is only legal in the UK under the following circumstances:

"it is performed competently, in a suitable environment that reduces the risk of infection, cross-infection and contamination

it is believed to be in the child’s best interests

there is valid consent from the family/parent and the child, if Fraser competent."

3) There are plenty of episodes of overt, obvious irreversible harm that occurs in the UK, to male children who are circumcised, up to and including death.

"up to three children a month are admitted to the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital because of bleeding after home-based circumcisions."

Babies die every year in my UK after botched non-medically necessary circumcisions: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-20503660

And circumcisions carried out by doctors for non-medical (so cultural or religious reasons) may also result in harm. There are a number of doctors in the UK who have been disciplined in recent years due to botched circumcision of male children.

4) Many non-medical circumcisions are carried out without pain relief or anesthesia, including here in the UK.

I have no issues with medically necessary male circumcision. However, it is almost never medically necessary to circumcise a child and because some of the potential harms of circumcision might not be apparent until adulthood and full development of the penis happens, we should be very cautious in jumping to circumcision before exploring alternative options.

I do not agree with circumcision for non medical reasons, irrespective of which culture or religion it is performed within. There are several cultural and religious groups where male circumcision is common, it is not confined to one group or another and it is not solely religious. Irrespective, I do not agree with it.

I firmly believe that if there is a god, they would not create humankind only for it to be necessary to remove a piece at some point after birth.

Removing a piece after birth because it's medically necessary is quite different. We amputate unhealthy body parts very often, unfortunately. That is acceptable.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"There are some inaccuracies in this thread with relation to circumcision.

Therefore, whoever stated earlier that in the UK, all circumcisions are carried out by doctors, is incorrect.

2) Circumcision of males is only legal in the UK under the following circumstances:

"it is performed competently, in a suitable environment that reduces the risk of infection, cross-infection and contamination

it is believed to be in the child’s best interests

there is valid consent from the family/parent and the child, if Fraser competent."

3) There are plenty of episodes of overt, obvious irreversible harm that occurs in the UK, to male children who are circumcised, up to and including death.

"up to three children a month are admitted to the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital because of bleeding after home-based circumcisions."

Babies die every year in my UK after botched non-medically necessary circumcisions: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-20503660

4) Many non-medical circumcisions are carried out without pain relief or anesthesia, including here in the UK.

I firmly believe that if there is a god, they would not create humankind only for it to be necessary to remove a piece at some point after birth.

Removing a piece after birth because it's medically necessary is quite different. We amputate unhealthy body parts very often, unfortunately. That is acceptable. "

You feel strongly about this lol how long did that take to write

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

Nearly a decade ago, someone dear and near to me, suggested I watch a medical documentary film titled, "Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital". It’s tremendously informative, and difficult to watch without being emotionally moved. If you’re on the fence or cannot understand why such a fuss is made about circumcisions that aren’t medically compulsory I recommend this film.

Most people can see female genital mutilation as barbaric, but I’ll never understand how some cannot see male genital mutilation (in cases where circumcision not medically compulsory) as equally barbaric.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"Nearly a decade ago, someone dear and near to me, suggested I watch a medical documentary film titled, "Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital". It’s tremendously informative, and difficult to watch without being emotionally moved. If you’re on the fence or cannot understand why such a fuss is made about circumcisions that aren’t medically compulsory I recommend this film.

It because if it’s not medical they have been brain washed into thinking it’s ok ?

Don’t know why you’d want it if it wasn’t a necessity

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *utguyMan 26 weeks ago

Blackpool

I am cut and love cut cocks

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ornucopiaMan 26 weeks ago

Bexley

[Removed by poster at 01/06/24 03:47:19]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *exycarlashane181Couple 26 weeks ago

Leamington Spa

Prefer uncut... Hate wanking a cut cock

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *arkbigcock300Man 26 weeks ago

LONDONDERRY

eat that pussy

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

[Removed by poster at 01/06/24 03:53:40]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

Uncut as long as retractable foreskin, it is natural. Not all, but a majority of cut penises look mangled or visually unappealing. Although better than an ultra tight foreskin.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ornucopiaMan 26 weeks ago

Bexley

"Nothing worse than a mutilated dick"

How about a tattooed one?

Isn't tattooing another form of mutilation?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ayK1Man 26 weeks ago

rochdale

Prefer uncut, but I don't mind cut.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ddingextraspiceCouple 26 weeks ago

cumbria

Don’t mind either way, they both taste good

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *jekimMan 26 weeks ago

Wigan

Does it actually make a difference

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *unchalMan 26 weeks ago

Dartford

"I prefer to be as nature intended.

Heard all the BS 'health arguments' but it all comes down to cultural/religious bullshit, hence it's not standard in the UK and is elsewhere.

Shame mutilation of boys isn't viewed the same was as it is for girls. "

I agree. Just a pity about the foreskin being so badly designed that it has to be cut away.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ornucopiaMan 26 weeks ago

Bexley

"Prefer uncut... Hate wanking a cut cock "

If God had wanted people to wank, his devotees wouldn't have encouraged circumcision!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ornucopiaMan 26 weeks ago

Bexley

"I prefer to be as nature intended.

Heard all the BS 'health arguments' but it all comes down to cultural/religious bullshit, hence it's not standard in the UK and is elsewhere.

Shame mutilation of boys isn't viewed the same was as it is for girls.

I agree. Just a pity about the foreskin being so badly designed that it has to be cut away. "

I wouldn't call 'piss flaps' a particularly good piece of design either and can understand why some cultures prefer to trim them at an early age before memory of pain (apparently) sets in.

The clitoris, however is of an equisite design and its mutilation should quite rightly be treated as criminal.

My maternal cousins were all circumsized in infancy and I never heard them saying it hurt but I've heard plenty of later in life circumcisees telling a different tale but nevertheless being pleased overall with the outcome and therefore worth the pain.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *layful HarlequinMan 26 weeks ago

iver heath

Knot well I'm not what I am there's only one way to Find out

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *avey daveMan 26 weeks ago

Rochdale

I'm au natural never had complaints

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"I'm au natural never had complaints "

I'm O+, apparently the most common type in England

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

I mean Ryan comes across as informed there giving a talk that sounds befitting of TED, he has the PhD, and appears to sound like a "clinician". He is disingenuous though.

Ultimately he's a Physicist, an ethicist (nothing wrong being that way), author of "it's not just skin" and has absolutely no background in the medical https://physics.georgetown.edu/ryan-mcallister/

His last research in the topic of HIV infection and circumcisions was published in 2010 where he seemingly tried to debunk any links to the research, and is unfortunately still quoted by the misinformed. It's not even linked to anymore.

He mentions none of the positives and that should be cause for concern. The penile "sensitivity" heatmap was a rather strange one for example.

That said, a lot of what he mentions is relevant. And it's thanks to that "movement" that caused areas of research including the collection of data to be much more rigorous. That's great news for everyone.

WHO guidance is more recent and the evidence more substantial, statistical and relevant now.

I'm gonna say that, unless the organisation retracts its guidance (and there's no doubt it can) then let's appeal to reason. That there's undoubtedly a positive link between the historic prevalence and infections.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

"reduced infections"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *luehairedcumslutCouple 26 weeks ago

St Neots

I'm cut (medical reasons when infant). The slut prefers it but I do sometimes wish I was uncut. Think I'm more desensitised and takes me fucking ages to cum! Can be annoying at times but obviously get no complaints from partners that I last much longer than her.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *rill PhilMan 26 weeks ago

Crediton

One of my big takeaways from this thread is that quite often when people are asking other people to be respectful they proceed to be everything but respectful themselves.

Clearly to some people a "respectful and civilized discussion" means "agree with me or I'll start hurling abuse at you!"

I'm also failing to see (as some people seem to) the link between being critical of a specific religious practice and being bigoted against the people of that religion. Specially on the topic of something like circumcision which is practiced by a variety of religions.

To say that criticism of circumcision for religious purposes is antisemitic, is not really different to claiming that criticism of drinking alcohol for ritualistic reasons means you despise Chritians specifically because they have communion wine, ignoring the fact that many religiouns and social functions encourage the ritualistic drinking of booze.

It's deeply faulty reasoning and sadly, it is everywhere.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *inky_couple2020Couple 26 weeks ago

North West

"I prefer to be as nature intended.

Heard all the BS 'health arguments' but it all comes down to cultural/religious bullshit, hence it's not standard in the UK and is elsewhere.

Shame mutilation of boys isn't viewed the same was as it is for girls.

I agree. Just a pity about the foreskin being so badly designed that it has to be cut away.

I wouldn't call 'piss flaps' a particularly good piece of design either and can understand why some cultures prefer to trim them at an early age before memory of pain (apparently) sets in.

The clitoris, however is of an equisite design and its mutilation should quite rightly be treated as criminal.

By the term "piss flaps", are you referring to the female labia? If so, am I reading correctly that you "can understand why some cultures prefer to trim them at an early age before memory of pain (apparently) sets in"?

You are, if I've understood correctly, condoning female genital mutilation. Which is illegal. And abhorrent. And totally unnecessary.

And when do we have "memory of pain", out of interest?!?!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ornucopiaMan 26 weeks ago

Bexley

...

You are, if I've understood correctly, condoning female genital mutilation. Which is illegal. And abhorrent. And totally unnecessary.

And when do we have "memory of pain", out of interest?!?!"

I am talking about labiaplasty. I am happy to be advised on the legality of that. There is a world of difference between that and lumping similar surgery together with cliteridectomy for religious, cultural or sexist reasons.

Labiaplasty appears to be sought by many women who would prefer smooth labia to abnormally distended ones.

The ethics, understandably, centre around issues of choice and consent and at what stage does surgery become mutilation.

I mention memory of pain because that would appear to be the main reason for carrying out circumcision in infancy.

I didn't keep a record of when I first remember having pain but with the hindsight engendered by this subject, perhaps I should have done.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *essTTWoman 26 weeks ago

Birmingham

...

You are, if I've understood correctly, condoning female genital mutilation. Which is illegal. And abhorrent. And totally unnecessary.

And when do we have "memory of pain", out of interest?!?!

Labiaplasty appears to be sought by many women who would prefer smooth labia to abnormally distended ones.

The ethics, understandably, centre around issues of choice and consent and at what stage does surgery become mutilation.

I mention memory of pain because that would appear to be the main reason for carrying out circumcision in infancy.

I didn't keep a record of when I first remember having pain but with the hindsight engendered by this subject, perhaps I should have done."

Large labia isn't "abnormal"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *eebubbles76Man 26 weeks ago

Halifax

Mine was done as a baby, hours after birth for medical reasons, as apparently there was no hole and couldn't pee

As a young lad always hated getting changed in the changing room at school

But now I like how I look and how clean it is

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP 26 weeks ago

...

You are, if I've understood correctly, condoning female genital mutilation. Which is illegal. And abhorrent. And totally unnecessary.

And when do we have "memory of pain", out of interest?!?!

Labiaplasty appears to be sought by many women who would prefer smooth labia to abnormally distended ones.

The ethics, understandably, centre around issues of choice and consent and at what stage does surgery become mutilation.

I mention memory of pain because that would appear to be the main reason for carrying out circumcision in infancy.

I didn't keep a record of when I first remember having pain but with the hindsight engendered by this subject, perhaps I should have done.

Large labia isn't "abnormal" "

Well said. There are different sizes and shapes of genitals... male and female. And I'd argue that getting your labia operated on just for them to 'look less large' is just another indicator of the sexist, patriarchal porn-infested and immature view of real women's bodies.

And it has F all to do with male circumcision, whether for health or cultural reasons.

Or getting your babies' ears pierced. Every family in Spain gets their girls done in infancy. No one complains or calls it mutilation. That's just ridiculous and Anglo-centric and offensive.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *inky_couple2020Couple 26 weeks ago

North West

...

You are, if I've understood correctly, condoning female genital mutilation. Which is illegal. And abhorrent. And totally unnecessary.

And when do we have "memory of pain", out of interest?!?!

Labiaplasty appears to be sought by many women who would prefer smooth labia to abnormally distended ones.

The ethics, understandably, centre around issues of choice and consent and at what stage does surgery become mutilation.

I mention memory of pain because that would appear to be the main reason for carrying out circumcision in infancy.

I didn't keep a record of when I first remember having pain but with the hindsight engendered by this subject, perhaps I should have done."

Labiaplasty is not performed on children. If a grown woman makes an informed choice to alter her anatomy, via a safe surgical method (rather than having it chopped with a piece of rusty metal whilst being held down by the local people), then she is entitled to do that. Labiaplasty is, in my opinion, usually a completely unnecessary procedure and usually for perceived cosmetic reasons (relating to unrealistic expectations of what women's genitals should look like).

And finally, there is memory of pain at all stages of life. Children become traumatised by events and actions from the very start of their lives even in-utero.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 26 weeks ago

To those jumping in my inbox, stop. Keep it here

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *pandjMan 25 weeks ago

Sparkford

I was done last year and once the initial injection went in I didn't feel a thing. Had worse times at the dentist.

Afterwards night erections were a it annoying as it pulled on in the stitches but was defo bearable.

Wouldn't suggest anyone gets done until they are sexualy active and knows it doesn't work properly.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *esiGalGuy123Man 25 weeks ago

Find me..

Cut, not only they look good but hygienic too.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *octor ProdMan 25 weeks ago

working Overseas

I'm cut, had it done as a child for medical reasons

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *enrydarrenMan 22 weeks ago

Harrow Weald

Cut had no complaints plus I like it . My mum she says was for medical reasons in 1970 (2yo) it was done, my brother is uncut

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *uliette500Woman 22 weeks ago

Hull

It's a tiny bit of foreskin, done at the hospital and it keeps cocks nice and clean. I've lost count how many uncut guys "forget" to clean under the foreskin.

Yes, it used to be the norm for North Americans... hence my preference. But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?

A bit of civilised debate please. "

It's often performed by the highest ranking female in the family so nothing to so with hating women. Not that it matters because the practice is barbaric and yes circumcision of males is not the same but still in my opinion should only be allowed for medical reasons. There is no need in todays society to be cutting bits off children in the name of religion.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *arlot o scaraWoman 22 weeks ago

Hell

"But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?"

Yes, and it’s an absolutely disgusting practice. That’s why any reputable won’t do it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) 22 weeks ago

Cut

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *hunky GentMan 22 weeks ago

Maldon and Peterborough

Mine is tight when erect and sits behind the glans, so it looks cut.

I suppose I fall into bothe categories - in a way.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ripfillMan 22 weeks ago

havant

Uncut . Extra to play with plus I

Like to give it a good scrub

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *edonisthenryMan 22 weeks ago

Cambridge

"Cut

A lady of taste who likes to flirt.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *iddlesticksMan 22 weeks ago

My nan’s spare room.

Having been circumcised late in life referred by GP done by the NHS, I would say I prefer my new chap.

But that’s probably because I went through life with a foreskin too tight which sometimes made certain activities uncomfortable at best.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ozzybear1981Man 22 weeks ago

preston

Cut when I was 18 through a shockingly d*unken sexual episode

But wouldn’t change it even if I could

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *londebiguyMan 22 weeks ago

Southport

"I prefer to be as nature intended.

Heard all the BS 'health arguments' but it all comes down to cultural/religious bullshit, hence it's not standard in the UK and is elsewhere.

Shame mutilation of boys isn't viewed the same was as it is for girls. "

Precisely.

No reason for it at all .

Certainly not for cleanliness in countries that are not generally hot.

It decreases sensitivity and its just a bit weird for me.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *londebiguyMan 22 weeks ago

Southport

It's a tiny bit of foreskin, done at the hospital and it keeps cocks nice and clean. I've lost count how many uncut guys "forget" to clean under the foreskin.

Yes, it used to be the norm for North Americans... hence my preference. But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?

A bit of civilised debate please. "

Circumcision has historically been and us still not always performed in a hospital or by a doctor.

It's not racist or sexist at all.

No need to be so offended.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *londebiguyMan 22 weeks ago

Southport

"But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?

Yes, and it’s an absolutely disgusting practice. That’s why any reputable won’t do it. "

Why is it disgusting?

It is not for you to decide that for others.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *edonisthenryMan 22 weeks ago

Cambridge

"Cut when I was 18 through a shockingly d*unken sexual episode

But wouldn’t change it even if I could

Crikey!!!!!!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ozzybear1981Man 22 weeks ago

preston

"Cut when I was 18 through a shockingly d*unken sexual episode

But wouldn’t change it even if I could

Crikey!!!!!!! "

It’s not a story for the grandkids but it is a funny one

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *arlot o scaraWoman 22 weeks ago

Hell

"But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?

Yes, and it’s an absolutely disgusting practice. That’s why any reputable won’t do it.

Why is it disgusting?

It is not for you to decide that for others."

Get a grip of yourself lad. Piercing babies is gross. Babies cannot consent to a cosmetic procedure.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ozzybear1981Man 22 weeks ago

preston

"But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?

Yes, and it’s an absolutely disgusting practice. That’s why any reputable won’t do it.

Why is it disgusting?

It is not for you to decide that for others.

Get a grip of yourself lad. Piercing babies is gross. Babies cannot consent to a cosmetic procedure. "

Completely agree!!

Any human no matter what the piercing should be at an age to be able to consent and say…I want that!!

Otherwise it’s taking their rights away and is actually abuse!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *londebiguyMan 22 weeks ago

Southport

"Oh dear lord, so now it's all a conspiracy theory by Americans to combat masturbation?

And yes, breasts are removed in case of cancer... Don't see what you're getting at. Breasts are also removed where familial risks of cancer are expected.

This infection risk can be around 60% of contracting the virus from a female partner through vaginal intercourse and a slightly lower risk of other STI's infection.

The active partner is usually at a much lower risk anyway to infection of HIV and it is far more likely to be contracted through bodily fluid or blood .

There is little evidence of this in anal intercourse for men which make me wary of completely accepting this data.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *arlot o scaraWoman 22 weeks ago

Hell

And yes, breasts are removed in case of cancer... Don't see what you're getting at. "

False equivalency. Breasts are not routinely removed at birth.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *arlot o scaraWoman 22 weeks ago

Hell

"But so's ear piercings on babies. That's cultural too. You gonna call that mutilation?

Yes, and it’s an absolutely disgusting practice. That’s why any reputable won’t do it.

Why is it disgusting?

It is not for you to decide that for others.

Get a grip of yourself lad. Piercing babies is gross. Babies cannot consent to a cosmetic procedure.

Completely agree!!

Any human no matter what the piercing should be at an age to be able to consent and say…I want that!!

Otherwise it’s taking their rights away and is actually abuse!"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)