FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Unsolicited videos
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nope your not being prude anything unwanted isn’t being prude you didn’t ask for that the person should have known better Also hugs you had to go through that just wished people would think more before sending messages " Ahhh hugs are always welcome. X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nope your not being prude anything unwanted isn’t being prude you didn’t ask for that the person should have known better Also hugs you had to go through that just wished people would think more before sending messages Ahhh hugs are always welcome. X" Your welcome anytime | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! " probably got the same video from the same guy, I just blocked, I found reporting things here led nowhere | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did you watch it? Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life. Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail " Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did you watch it? Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life. Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right? " No. Because that’s in the street And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! " Yeah, you probably are over reacting a little bit, given this is a site largely dedicated to having sex with strangers, regardless of all the talk of connections. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did you watch it? Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life. Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right? No. Because that’s in the street And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either. " But it’s not “just junk mail” and more than a guy putting Polaroids of his penis through your letterbox is “just junk mail.” We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did you watch it? Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life. Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right? No. Because that’s in the street And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either. But it’s not “just junk mail” and more than a guy putting Polaroids of his penis through your letterbox is “just junk mail.” We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin." Look. Here is my view. If I was on a knitting, I would expect my junk mail would be other people showing me what knitted , a jumper, gloves, et cetera. Maybe even somebody trying to sell me new yarn. But I’m on a sex website, where peoples avatars a cock pics and vaginas and gaping arseholes. So I would expect my junk mail to be something similar. So I refer to it a junk mail whether it’s right or wrong to send a dick pic or tits into somebody’s inbox, is subjective. Because I know some people on here are here for that. Don’t try to twist it to say I’m (or others) are alright with it, or I do it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did you watch it? Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life. Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right? No. Because that’s in the street And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either. But it’s not “just junk mail” and more than a guy putting Polaroids of his penis through your letterbox is “just junk mail.” We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin. Look. Here is my view. If I was on a knitting, I would expect my junk mail would be other people showing me what knitted , a jumper, gloves, et cetera. Maybe even somebody trying to sell me new yarn. But I’m on a sex website, where peoples avatars a cock pics and vaginas and gaping arseholes. So I would expect my junk mail to be something similar. So I refer to it a junk mail whether it’s right or wrong to send a dick pic or tits into somebody’s inbox, is subjective. Because I know some people on here are here for that. Don’t try to twist it to say I’m (or others) are alright with it, or I do it. " The thing is, every time that I post on the forums about how we should report these messages or that it’s just wrong to send them, I get messages from male people, that are bordering on abusive, about how basically I shouldn’t be on a swing site if I can’t cope with men sending images of their genitals to my *private* inbox. And every time a guy on the forums is like “meh just delete it” although he’s saying it with good intentions, what these abusive guys are hearing is “these men all support me and I am in the right for feeling entitled to enter women’s *private* inboxes with pictures of my genitals.” It’s like when you’re in the pub and one of the lads tells a sexist joke. If everyone just stays silent he doesn’t think he’s wrong. It’s the bystander effect and it gives him the confidence to do it again. If everyone around him (especially fellow men) said “actually mate, that’s not ok” we might actually make some progress. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People forget this is a public forum. Lots of people message off the back of what someone has posted. It's also a public forum on a adult content site. So no, I wouldn't be outraged or offended. I'd probably watch it snigger a little, delete and get on with my life. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! Yeah, you probably are over reacting a little bit, given this is a site largely dedicated to having sex with strangers, regardless of all the talk of connections. " This site is a swingers site and with all sexual activity in real life or online consent is key. We shouldn't expect people to take away that consent because we are on here. Rather than blame the people who don't like it, blame the pricks sending their cock to anyone and everyone who'll look, they are the issue. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did you watch it? Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life. Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right? No. Because that’s in the street And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either. But it’s not “just junk mail” and more than a guy putting Polaroids of his penis through your letterbox is “just junk mail.” We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin. Look. Here is my view. If I was on a knitting, I would expect my junk mail would be other people showing me what knitted , a jumper, gloves, et cetera. Maybe even somebody trying to sell me new yarn. But I’m on a sex website, where peoples avatars a cock pics and vaginas and gaping arseholes. So I would expect my junk mail to be something similar. So I refer to it a junk mail whether it’s right or wrong to send a dick pic or tits into somebody’s inbox, is subjective. Because I know some people on here are here for that. Don’t try to twist it to say I’m (or others) are alright with it, or I do it. The thing is, every time that I post on the forums about how we should report these messages or that it’s just wrong to send them, I get messages from male people, that are bordering on abusive, about how basically I shouldn’t be on a swing site if I can’t cope with men sending images of their genitals to my *private* inbox. And every time a guy on the forums is like “meh just delete it” although he’s saying it with good intentions, what these abusive guys are hearing is “these men all support me and I am in the right for feeling entitled to enter women’s *private* inboxes with pictures of my genitals.” It’s like when you’re in the pub and one of the lads tells a sexist joke. If everyone just stays silent he doesn’t think he’s wrong. It’s the bystander effect and it gives him the confidence to do it again. If everyone around him (especially fellow men) said “actually mate, that’s not ok” we might actually make some progress." I don't have a penis, I swear. But I'm also fully aware of where I am and I know the kind of things men will send. And yeah, that's never gonna change. I don't think anyone is saying it's fine, but jeez if I was so offended at seeing a penis I'd do something about it. Block men, hide images, look at my phone behind my fingers etc. Also, you cannot compare fab to getting images in everyday life. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"…. We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin. Look. Here is my view. If I was on a knitting, I would expect my junk mail would be other people showing me what knitted , a jumper, gloves, et cetera. Maybe even somebody trying to sell me new yarn. But I’m on a sex website, where peoples avatars a cock pics and vaginas and gaping arseholes. So I would expect my junk mail to be something similar. So I refer to it a junk mail whether it’s right or wrong to send a dick pic or tits into somebody’s inbox, is subjective. Because I know some people on here are here for that. Don’t try to twist it to say I’m (or others) are alright with it, or I do it. The thing is, every time that I post on the forums about how we should report these messages or that it’s just wrong to send them, I get messages from male people, that are bordering on abusive, about how basically I shouldn’t be on a swing site if I can’t cope with men sending images of their genitals to my *private* inbox. And every time a guy on the forums is like “meh just delete it” although he’s saying it with good intentions, what these abusive guys are hearing is “these men all support me and I am in the right for feeling entitled to enter women’s *private* inboxes with pictures of my genitals.” It’s like when you’re in the pub and one of the lads tells a sexist joke. If everyone just stays silent he doesn’t think he’s wrong. It’s the bystander effect and it gives him the confidence to do it again. If everyone around him (especially fellow men) said “actually mate, that’s not ok” we might actually make some progress." I actually support the view of a detailed profile. NO DICK PICS. (you shouldn’t have to put it, but here we are) I support people reading profiles… again, but here we are. The best you can do is continue to report, receiving things you don’t like and I agree with anyone doing that, because then the people who run the website might do something about it. But I don’t think it’s on the list of their priorities, considering it is a website that allows you on your profile to put these type of pictures and videos for people to view them publicly. Also, going back to your jokes amongst friends, I know my audience, and I think we all do, and we tell jokes to our friends which we wouldn’t tell to strangers. But I have common sense., and a lot of people on public forums, and Fab don’t, and they are the ones that find themselves the subject of a thread, where the original post has pointed out, they received a DM they are not happy with from someone - An unsolicited explicit video. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People forget this is a public forum. Lots of people message off the back of what someone has posted. It's also a public forum on a adult content site. So no, I wouldn't be outraged or offended. I'd probably watch it snigger a little, delete and get on with my life. " I didn't say I was outraged ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did you watch it? Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life. Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right? No. Because that’s in the street And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either. But it’s not “just junk mail” and more than a guy putting Polaroids of his penis through your letterbox is “just junk mail.” We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin. Look. Here is my view. If I was on a knitting, I would expect my junk mail would be other people showing me what knitted , a jumper, gloves, et cetera. Maybe even somebody trying to sell me new yarn. But I’m on a sex website, where peoples avatars a cock pics and vaginas and gaping arseholes. So I would expect my junk mail to be something similar. So I refer to it a junk mail whether it’s right or wrong to send a dick pic or tits into somebody’s inbox, is subjective. Because I know some people on here are here for that. Don’t try to twist it to say I’m (or others) are alright with it, or I do it. The thing is, every time that I post on the forums about how we should report these messages or that it’s just wrong to send them, I get messages from male people, that are bordering on abusive, about how basically I shouldn’t be on a swing site if I can’t cope with men sending images of their genitals to my *private* inbox. And every time a guy on the forums is like “meh just delete it” although he’s saying it with good intentions, what these abusive guys are hearing is “these men all support me and I am in the right for feeling entitled to enter women’s *private* inboxes with pictures of my genitals.” It’s like when you’re in the pub and one of the lads tells a sexist joke. If everyone just stays silent he doesn’t think he’s wrong. It’s the bystander effect and it gives him the confidence to do it again. If everyone around him (especially fellow men) said “actually mate, that’s not ok” we might actually make some progress." This. Well said. J | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just to clarify as it seems things have escalated! I expect cock shots attached to most messages. I know it goes with the territory and I've always accepted that as yes this is a sex site. What I injected to was a video of some random knocking one out. I'm a big girl and this isn't my first rodeo. I wasn't looking for sympathy I was interested in finding out peoples opinions ! Its been interesting reading everyone's view points and coming to the conclusion that misogyny is still alive and well. " I don't believe it's being a misogynist to suggest if you don't like the content, block it, or don't join a site where it's very well known to be mostly men, some of whom are offensive twats. It's a free site and will attract all sorts. That's not to say its ok. It isn't ok. It's just being surprised or offended by it... There are ways to protect yourself from it very easily. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We shouldn't have to just accept that we will receive these pics and videos. Doesn't matter that's its a swinging site. Men should respect the fact that if we want to see, we will ask" Yes if we want to see it we'll ask ....or they can just ask if we want a dick pic....most dick pics are so up close too & quite graphic..with absolutely no idea of the body type or whatever | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We shouldn't have to just accept that we will receive these pics and videos. Doesn't matter that's its a swinging site. Men should respect the fact that if we want to see, we will ask Yes if we want to see it we'll ask ....or they can just ask if we want a dick pic....most dick pics are so up close too & quite graphic..with absolutely no idea of the body type or whatever " And that’s exactly how it should be. I’ve got myself into an argument above because I support that exact view, and also have a different way of reacting. To the op. It’s was a good question on Fab. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We shouldn't have to just accept that we will receive these pics and videos. Doesn't matter that's its a swinging site. Men should respect the fact that if we want to see, we will ask" Exactly this! If men don't take consent seriously they shouldn't be here. The oh it's ok because it's a swingers site is a load of bollocks, being a swingers site doesn't take away the need for consent nor does it make grown men that act like pricks ok. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed. " Totally stupid comparison in my opinion. We go to a supermarket and look for what we want, its not just thrown in our trolley by other people. We ask if we cant see what we want. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed. " So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not. What a ridiculous comparison. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed. So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not. What a ridiculous comparison. Mrs " You can throw rum into my basket, or coffee. Thank you… ^consent. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! " No. You are absolutely within your rights to object strongly to such behaviour. And the more who do object, maybe some men will grow up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed. So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not. What a ridiculous comparison. Mrs " It is a bad comparison. Though if I went shopping with my tits out in an adult only grocery store (oooh there's an idea) I'd kinda expect to see a few penises. Or maybe hope. And also, I wouldn't complain if they put said penis in my basket if it was pretty and from a hot guy. But there we go! Also, hot wedding pics! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed. So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not. What a ridiculous comparison. Mrs You can throw rum into my basket, or coffee. Thank you… ^consent. " Lol....sure while you're at it you can throw a few bottles of Merlot & Malbec into mine & a few strip-loin steaks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! " Some would say you are and a few here would have you imprison him, I'd say put it on your profile that you dont want penis pics or wank vids then leave it to admin to decide their fate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed. So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not. What a ridiculous comparison. Mrs It is a bad comparison. Though if I went shopping with my tits out in an adult only grocery store (oooh there's an idea) I'd kinda expect to see a few penises. Or maybe hope. And also, I wouldn't complain if they put said penis in my basket if it was pretty and from a hot guy. But there we go! Also, hot wedding pics! " Thanks had to have an alternative wedding album. I expect to see explicit pics of course I do, I choose to look. I don't expect adults to send unsolicited pics/vids like it's normal removing any consent regardless of the site. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed. So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not. What a ridiculous comparison. Mrs It is a bad comparison. Though if I went shopping with my tits out in an adult only grocery store (oooh there's an idea) I'd kinda expect to see a few penises. Or maybe hope. And also, I wouldn't complain if they put said penis in my basket if it was pretty and from a hot guy. But there we go! Also, hot wedding pics! Thanks had to have an alternative wedding album. I expect to see explicit pics of course I do, I choose to look. I don't expect adults to send unsolicited pics/vids like it's normal removing any consent regardless of the site. Mrs " Somebody mentioned to me tacit consent Noun. tacit consent - (law) tacit approval of someone's wrongdoing And I’m read into it, and see whether I agree I don’t agree with this. If I actually being on here, we are already consent to this type of thing. I’m 50/50 with the argument, but still hundred percent that we should always ask first. “Can I please put my pretty penis into your basket?” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"…. I don't expect adults to send unsolicited pics/vids like it's normal removing any consent regardless of the site. Mrs Somebody mentioned to me tacit consent Noun. tacit consent - (law) tacit approval of someone's wrongdoing And I’m read into it, and see whether I agree I don’t agree with this. If I actually being on here, we are already consent to this type of thing. I’m 50/50 with the argument, but still hundred percent that we should always ask first. “Can I please put my pretty penis into your basket?” " Sorry. “Inbox!” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To fully understand your perspective: I think some ladies should send me unsolicited videos of them wanking Maybe with a shared experience I can relate better and give in-depth advise." Haha ditto … shame its never the other way round a ….. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed. So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not. What a ridiculous comparison. Mrs It is a bad comparison. Though if I went shopping with my tits out in an adult only grocery store (oooh there's an idea) I'd kinda expect to see a few penises. Or maybe hope. And also, I wouldn't complain if they put said penis in my basket if it was pretty and from a hot guy. But there we go! Also, hot wedding pics! Thanks had to have an alternative wedding album. I expect to see explicit pics of course I do, I choose to look. I don't expect adults to send unsolicited pics/vids like it's normal removing any consent regardless of the site. Mrs Somebody mentioned to me tacit consent Noun. tacit consent - (law) tacit approval of someone's wrongdoing And I’m read into it, and see whether I agree I don’t agree with this. If I actually being on here, we are already consent to this type of thing. I’m 50/50 with the argument, but still hundred percent that we should always ask first. “Can I please put my pretty penis into your basket?” " I don't like penis, keep it out my basket - now if you where to send one are you saying that's all well and good? Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! Yeah, you probably are over reacting a little bit, given this is a site largely dedicated to having sex with strangers, regardless of all the talk of connections. " No.. Simply no, the Op is not over reacting and your idea of having sex with strangers might be for you and some others but not all by any means.. It shouldn't be excused because it's on here, it's non consensual and downright creepy.. Him | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed. So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not. What a ridiculous comparison. Mrs It is a bad comparison. Though if I went shopping with my tits out in an adult only grocery store (oooh there's an idea) I'd kinda expect to see a few penises. Or maybe hope. And also, I wouldn't complain if they put said penis in my basket if it was pretty and from a hot guy. But there we go! Also, hot wedding pics! Thanks had to have an alternative wedding album. I expect to see explicit pics of course I do, I choose to look. I don't expect adults to send unsolicited pics/vids like it's normal removing any consent regardless of the site. Mrs Somebody mentioned to me tacit consent Noun. tacit consent - (law) tacit approval of someone's wrongdoing And I’m read into it, and see whether I agree I don’t agree with this. If I actually being on here, we are already consent to this type of thing. I’m 50/50 with the argument, but still hundred percent that we should always ask first. “Can I please put my pretty penis into your basket?” I don't like penis, keep it out my basket - now if you where to send one are you saying that's all well and good? Mrs " No, Absolutely not, and I hope anyone was able to read that point which I (and others) have been putting all the way through this thread. And by you saying it and making that point, it give you every right in the world to be fucked off, and do everything you can to make me learn a lesson in respect, if I sent you one. X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I went to the supermarket the other day. Imagine how browned off I was when there were rows upon rows of things to buy. I'm going again this week. I hope there's nothing in there to buy or I'll be right dischuffed. So if I throw my shopping into your basket that's ok is it, regardless if you want it or not. What a ridiculous comparison. Mrs It is a bad comparison. Though if I went shopping with my tits out in an adult only grocery store (oooh there's an idea) I'd kinda expect to see a few penises. Or maybe hope. And also, I wouldn't complain if they put said penis in my basket if it was pretty and from a hot guy. But there we go! Also, hot wedding pics! Thanks had to have an alternative wedding album. I expect to see explicit pics of course I do, I choose to look. I don't expect adults to send unsolicited pics/vids like it's normal removing any consent regardless of the site. Mrs Somebody mentioned to me tacit consent Noun. tacit consent - (law) tacit approval of someone's wrongdoing And I’m read into it, and see whether I agree I don’t agree with this. If I actually being on here, we are already consent to this type of thing. I’m 50/50 with the argument, but still hundred percent that we should always ask first. “Can I please put my pretty penis into your basket?” I don't like penis, keep it out my basket - now if you where to send one are you saying that's all well and good? Mrs No, Absolutely not, and I hope anyone was able to read that point which I (and others) have been putting all the way through this thread. And by you saying it and making that point, it give you every right in the world to be fucked off, and do everything you can to make me learn a lesson in respect, if I sent you one. X " Thank you Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No.... You're not being a prude at all OP. Its not a nice experience at all most of the time when a cock is shoved in our faces virtually & unexpectedly from a total stranger .... But unfortunately on some sites & here too it's very common for that to happen....Cyber Flashing is rife...." Hang on. This didn’t happen while she shopping in Tesco. It happened on a site where strangers look for sex with other strangers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No.... You're not being a prude at all OP. Its not a nice experience at all most of the time when a cock is shoved in our faces virtually & unexpectedly from a total stranger .... But unfortunately on some sites & here too it's very common for that to happen....Cyber Flashing is rife.... Hang on. This didn’t happen while she shopping in Tesco. It happened on a site where strangers look for sex with other strangers. " And what part of it being a swingers site takes away ones consent? Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Hang on. This didn’t happen while she shopping in Tesco. It happened on a site where strangers look for sex with other strangers. " If it happened in Tesco, the person doing it would be on their way to being on a register. None of us like cold callers telling us we had an accident and are due compensation, but would we be ok if they messaged us on here instead? No it wouldn’t. So what makes it ok to it to happen on this site? It shouldn’t happen full stop, regardless of where it’s happened. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If i saw a video attached to a pic, I'd delete it as I'd assume it's not gonna be something I want to see. Even with attached pics I'm looking at profiles and if I think it's iffy I'll just delete it now. Just because women and couples are on a swinging site, doesn't entitle random men to send pics of their junk or explicit videos. People should work on the basis that if others want to see, they will indicate that they do. If I'd opened a wanking video from someone I've never spoken to, they'd get a curt reply and a block. If somebody wants to report them for it, that's their choice and I'd love to know if there would be any action taken, if a few people reported them. " This. It being a swinging site does not entitle anyone to send unsolicited explicit direct messages to anyone else. Same as someone being in a swinger’s club - a club where people go to have sex with other people - does not entitle anyone to touch them or wank over them without consent. What people have in their public avatars and pics is irrelevant. We’re not talking about what people choose to display publicly or what people choose to look at by accessing a profile. We’re talking about sending an explicit direct private message without consent. It’s not OK and not an overreaction to block and report it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! " Like any unsolicited dick pic/video we receive we inform the sender the message will be reported and inform them of the recent cyber flashing prosecution and the law around it. People seem to think being on a “sex site” provides them with freedom of consequence from such an act, which it does not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K" Exactly this More needs to be done by the site owners. Ignorance is not a defence in this situation. Surely the site owners have a duty of care. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K" Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs " I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction " Whataboutary | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So many grown adults showing that they don’t understand consent " It’s scary isn’t it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! " no I don't think your being a prude xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction Whataboutary" Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction Whataboutary Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test. " Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though. People can put what they like on their profiles. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So many grown adults showing that they don’t understand consent It’s scary isn’t it. " Very! Especially here too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction " Tits ain't genitals for a start, least come back and try and use a vagina for comparison, oh yeah I forgot I've never had an unsolicited vagina - because women generally have some sense of consent & class. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How would they react if it was their mum or sister that was having it done to them? I'm sure that they would be furious, but yet it's justified as its a swingers site... Like take yourself off to the corner, and slap your cock, for being a very very naughty boy.... Mr " It comes down to consent, if that happened in a club, I'd be flicking him with a stretched out condom on sensitive areas, well I'd do worse to be fair Mr | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction Tits ain't genitals for a start, least come back and try and use a vagina for comparison, oh yeah I forgot I've never had an unsolicited vagina - because women generally have some sense of consent & class. Mrs " You understand the point then. You have to have rules for both if offence is drawn for one. A guy waving his dick at you in a club or a woman rubbing herself off. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. " Now finally a sensible answer & a solution. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction Tits ain't genitals for a start, least come back and try and use a vagina for comparison, oh yeah I forgot I've never had an unsolicited vagina - because women generally have some sense of consent & class. Mrs You understand the point then. You have to have rules for both if offence is drawn for one. A guy waving his dick at you in a club or a woman rubbing herself off. " If either guy or woman shoved their genitals in my face without consent they are both wrong. If they did this in a club they'd both get kicked out. I'm struggling to see which part of this you take an issue with. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. Now finally a sensible answer & a solution. Mrs " The problem is would others abide by it, many don't read a profile or they do and still choose to send cock shots. Maybe people could simply try asking others before they send pics. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction Whataboutary Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test. Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though. People can put what they like on their profiles. " The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction Whataboutary Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test. Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though. People can put what they like on their profiles. The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently. " The same does apply just most women don't shove their vagina in someone's face. Tits and chest are a comparison, genitals and genitals are a comparison, you can't compare a chest with a cock or a knee with an elbow. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction Whataboutary Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test. Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though. People can put what they like on their profiles. The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently. " Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction Whataboutary Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test. Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though. People can put what they like on their profiles. The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently. " So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner... Mr | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm struggling to see which part of this you take an issue with. Mrs " The thread is talking about consent, offence, there's a whole lot of outrage, talk of misogyny and reporting. What is offensive to one, isn't to another. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thank you to ones who’ve sent me vag so far, it’s appreciated " Oh, so tempting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction Whataboutary Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test. Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though. People can put what they like on their profiles. The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently. The same does apply just most women don't shove their vagina in someone's face. Tits and chest are a comparison, genitals and genitals are a comparison, you can't compare a chest with a cock or a knee with an elbow. Mrs " I had a woman constantly send me photos of her very large tits & let's just say they weren't attractive tits..so yes women do send unsolicited content too & cyber flash & should be treated the very same way as their make counter parts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction Whataboutary Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test. Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though. People can put what they like on their profiles. The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently. The same does apply just most women don't shove their vagina in someone's face. Tits and chest are a comparison, genitals and genitals are a comparison, you can't compare a chest with a cock or a knee with an elbow. Mrs I had a woman constantly send me photos of her very large tits & let's just say they weren't attractive tits..so yes women do send unsolicited content too & cyber flash & should be treated the very same way as their make counter parts" Hence **most women & the same does apply. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even in a sex club, if someone walked up to you and waved their cock in front of you, without ever speaking or connecting beforehand they would get spoken to and thrown out for indecent behaviour. And indeed if it happened at a group social event organised on here. They’d get reported and thrown out. So it should be no different on here. K Exactly this, sex club, sex site either or isn't an excuse for not understanding consent. Mrs I wonder if reporting women for shaking their boobs would gain the same traction Whataboutary Never shook tits, is innocent of everything. Good to hear. You pass consent/non-consent, reporting, block, offence test. Surely shaking your tits is different to taking a video of them and then sending it to people who haven't asked to see it though. People can put what they like on their profiles. The point was being made about shaking stuff unsolicited in a club. I've already said women no doubt get too much of it on here (though filters are there), though if men can get reported and thrown out of a club the same must apply to women. Whataboutary and tit's weren't offensive enough apparently. The same does apply just most women don't shove their vagina in someone's face. Tits and chest are a comparison, genitals and genitals are a comparison, you can't compare a chest with a cock or a knee with an elbow. Mrs I had a woman constantly send me photos of her very large tits & let's just say they weren't attractive tits..so yes women do send unsolicited content too & cyber flash & should be treated the very same way as their make counter parts" *male counterparts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thank you to ones who’ve sent me vag so far, it’s appreciated Oh, so tempting." Please include your bum hole as well | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm struggling to see which part of this you take an issue with. Mrs The thread is talking about consent, offence, there's a whole lot of outrage, talk of misogyny and reporting. What is offensive to one, isn't to another. " And for the 4th time a man or woman that does it is wrong. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Yeah, you probably are over reacting a little bit, given this is a site largely dedicated to having sex with strangers, regardless of all the talk of connections. " They are absolutely not over reacting. Digital flashing is a crime for a reason. Regardless of what you feel the site is for, there is no reason to send unsolicited photos or videos. Ever | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this. Is it the equivalent of flashing in public? Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? " I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. " Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here. " So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner... Mr " Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective. If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this. Is it the equivalent of flashing in public? Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? " me to | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this. Is it the equivalent of flashing in public? Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject. Mrs " The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive.. Mr | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this. Is it the equivalent of flashing in public? Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject. Mrs The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive.. Mr " Admin is the mods and the mods are admin | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this. Is it the equivalent of flashing in public? Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject. Mrs The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive.. Mr " I've asked them already with zero response. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We're not going to get people behaving the way we want them to (in this case, not sending cock pics/vids). If this is cyber flashing ( on here, it seems more nuanced)-who's going to be willing to use the mechanism of the law to bring the senders to task?" exactly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here. So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner... Mr Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective. If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content"" I'm so glad you gave perspective, as I've been in the wrong place for the past 7 years... I thought this was the Blue Peter Fan club....here's one I consented to earlier... Mr | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this. Is it the equivalent of flashing in public? Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject. Mrs The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive.. Mr I've asked them already with zero response. Mrs " Kinda standard really, no response Mr | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here. So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner... Mr Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective. If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content"" This just isn't right though is it. For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck. It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff. Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face. A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here. We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals. It's not sexy. Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right. I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this. Is it the equivalent of flashing in public? Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject. Mrs The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive.. Mr " Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive? Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this. Is it the equivalent of flashing in public? Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject. Mrs The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive.. Mr Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive? Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no? " According to the terms and conditions they abide by UK law and we ourselves are responsible for what is sent in private message & encouraged to report as we seem appropriate. To me the law is pretty clear. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this. Is it the equivalent of flashing in public? Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject. Mrs The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive.. Mr Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive? Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no? " Tbh honest Woody, what admin/mods deem as offensive, is above my pay grade I'm afraid. I stay in my own lane and monitor my own behaviour or not depending on how much of a cunt I wanna be. Mr | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thank you to ones who’ve sent me vag so far, it’s appreciated Oh, so tempting. Please include your bum hole as well " I have it here in writing so you'll get my bum hole too, piles included | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here. So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner... Mr Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective. If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content" This just isn't right though is it. For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck. It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff. Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face. A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here. We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals. It's not sexy. Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right. I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging. Mrs " Yes but what you are saying means its all done on your terms so you look and you choose to talk sex or not, this app is regarded as a sex app /site. You show explicit content and you therefore have to be by that nature open to sexual innuendo and explicit vids and pics otherwise you block that content so it can't be sent. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here. So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner... Mr Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective. If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content" This just isn't right though is it. For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck. It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff. Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face. A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here. We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals. It's not sexy. Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right. I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging. Mrs " You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone. Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I …. The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive.. Mr Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive? Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no? Tbh honest Woody, what admin/mods deem as offensive, is above my pay grade I'm afraid. I stay in my own lane and monitor my own behaviour or not depending on how much of a cunt I wanna be. Mr " Haha. That’s the best we all can do isn’t it? What bothers me is, the people who are sending these dick pics won’t read the views in this thread, so the message that it’s wrong, is never going to get out there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thank you to ones who’ve sent me vag so far, it’s appreciated Oh, so tempting. Please include your bum hole as well I have it here in writing so you'll get my bum hole too, piles included " I like something to chew on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. " But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short. For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it. Liz. X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this. Is it the equivalent of flashing in public? Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject. Mrs The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive.. Mr Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive? Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no? " Do we really need a mod/admin to say don’t do what is illegal? Consent is consent. If none has been given then it’s not okay. No grey area. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short. For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it. Liz. X " Very true. Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this. Or Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos. Plenty of options, I’m sure. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here. So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner... Mr Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective. If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content" This just isn't right though is it. For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck. It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff. Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face. A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here. We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals. It's not sexy. Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right. I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging. Mrs You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone. Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site. " An adult site doesn't change the law & of course I've received those shitty messages, talking sex isn't illegal - cyber flashing is. I can look at any profile and I choose to view that knowing exactly what maybe on it, that's on me. Someone sending me a video of them wanking over me is not on me, it's not my choice & it's wrong, simple as. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would really like to read a mods opinion on where the website stand on this. Is it the equivalent of flashing in public? Because that was a question, are you being a prude? Or is it it reportable? I'd like to see that too as many of the previous ones have been deleted on the subject. Mrs The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive.. Mr Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive? Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no? Do we really need a mod/admin to say don’t do what is illegal? Consent is consent. If none has been given then it’s not okay. No grey area. " Exactly this how difficult is it. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s cyber flashing. Nothing less, as such it’s now illegal. Your feelings on it are completely valid and no one should be telling you to ‘suck it up’ or that it’s to be expected. No matter what site you’re on or what your profile picture is. " We inform anyone who sends us unsolicited dick/vagina pics of this. Cyber flashing laws are a very much welcomed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short. For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it. Liz. X Very true. Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this. Or Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos. Plenty of options, I’m sure. " And here - legal. Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore. Consent! Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I …. The mods opinions on this isn't really important, it's what admin deems as being offensive and what isn't offensive.. Mr Okay. Do you think they would deem it offensive? Because if they actually do, surely it is then reportable and would result in a clear rule where we could refer to. no? Tbh honest Woody, what admin/mods deem as offensive, is above my pay grade I'm afraid. I stay in my own lane and monitor my own behaviour or not depending on how much of a cunt I wanna be. Mr Haha. That’s the best we all can do isn’t it? What bothers me is, the people who are sending these dick pics won’t read the views in this thread, so the message that it’s wrong, is never going to get out there. " I hear that, but if one person who sees it being called out, and realises that its not okay, or that people are not alright with it. And they then amend there behaviour going forward. Then that's a success right. I'd ask yourself the question Woody, why does it bother you so much? Your taking on others shame, when it's not yours to take on, some food for thought. If you believe it to wrong then carry on calling it out, how that's recieved is down on the person recieveing it..... Mr | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short. For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it. Liz. X Very true. Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this. Or Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos. Plenty of options, I’m sure. And here - legal. Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore. Consent! Mrs " As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site. Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short. For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it. Liz. X Very true. Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this. Or Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos. Plenty of options, I’m sure. And here - legal. Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore. Consent! Mrs As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site. Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not. " So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying? Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here. So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner... Mr Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective. If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content" This just isn't right though is it. For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck. It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff. Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face. A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here. We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals. It's not sexy. Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right. I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging. Mrs You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone. Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site. An adult site doesn't change the law & of course I've received those shitty messages, talking sex isn't illegal - cyber flashing is. I can look at any profile and I choose to view that knowing exactly what maybe on it, that's on me. Someone sending me a video of them wanking over me is not on me, it's not my choice & it's wrong, simple as. Mrs " Just set your settings so they can't send them, sorted, whats the problem. I never send explicit pics or vids but i know this goes on, i always read profiles. I wouldn't be offended by anyone sending me said pics and vids but if i didn't like them i may block them, easy. Its a sex site and it works both ways if you know something and don't want it you have the tools in settings to stop it happening, you can also specify this on your profile. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here. So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner... Mr Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective. If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content" This just isn't right though is it. For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck. It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff. Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face. A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here. We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals. It's not sexy. Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right. I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging. Mrs You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone. Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site. An adult site doesn't change the law & of course I've received those shitty messages, talking sex isn't illegal - cyber flashing is. I can look at any profile and I choose to view that knowing exactly what maybe on it, that's on me. Someone sending me a video of them wanking over me is not on me, it's not my choice & it's wrong, simple as. Mrs Just set your settings so they can't send them, sorted, whats the problem. I never send explicit pics or vids but i know this goes on, i always read profiles. I wouldn't be offended by anyone sending me said pics and vids but if i didn't like them i may block them, easy. Its a sex site and it works both ways if you know something and don't want it you have the tools in settings to stop it happening, you can also specify this on your profile. " It's very much specified we don't even meet men they have a huge warning when they message yet they ignore it, why should I stop all conversation because of the ignorance of others? Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here. So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner... Mr Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective. If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content" This just isn't right though is it. For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck. It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff. Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face. A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here. We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals. It's not sexy. Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right. I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging. Mrs You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone. Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site. An adult site doesn't change the law & of course I've received those shitty messages, talking sex isn't illegal - cyber flashing is. I can look at any profile and I choose to view that knowing exactly what maybe on it, that's on me. Someone sending me a video of them wanking over me is not on me, it's not my choice & it's wrong, simple as. Mrs Just set your settings so they can't send them, sorted, whats the problem. I never send explicit pics or vids but i know this goes on, i always read profiles. I wouldn't be offended by anyone sending me said pics and vids but if i didn't like them i may block them, easy. Its a sex site and it works both ways if you know something and don't want it you have the tools in settings to stop it happening, you can also specify this on your profile. It's very much specified we don't even meet men they have a huge warning when they message yet they ignore it, why should I stop all conversation because of the ignorance of others? Mrs " No i think you can stop just images /vids | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here. So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner... Mr Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective. If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content" This just isn't right though is it. For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck. It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff. Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face. A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here. We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals. It's not sexy. Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right. I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging. Mrs You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone. Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site. An adult site doesn't change the law & of course I've received those shitty messages, talking sex isn't illegal - cyber flashing is. I can look at any profile and I choose to view that knowing exactly what maybe on it, that's on me. Someone sending me a video of them wanking over me is not on me, it's not my choice & it's wrong, simple as. Mrs Just set your settings so they can't send them, sorted, whats the problem. I never send explicit pics or vids but i know this goes on, i always read profiles. I wouldn't be offended by anyone sending me said pics and vids but if i didn't like them i may block them, easy. Its a sex site and it works both ways if you know something and don't want it you have the tools in settings to stop it happening, you can also specify this on your profile. It's very much specified we don't even meet men they have a huge warning when they message yet they ignore it, why should I stop all conversation because of the ignorance of others? Mrs No i think you can stop just images /vids " Why, I like viewing pics that I want to view, just because people push their genitals into others faces I should stop using the site as I please? No, people on a sex site of all places should understand consent. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short. For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it. Liz. X Very true. Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this. Or Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos. Plenty of options, I’m sure. And here - legal. Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore. Consent! Mrs As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site. Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not. So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying? Mrs " No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal. I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short. For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it. Liz. X Very true. Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this. Or Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos. Plenty of options, I’m sure. And here - legal. Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore. Consent! Mrs As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site. Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not. So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying? Mrs No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal. I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it. " Do you understand a ? That's me asking the question so I can understand. The woman who like them and consent to them all good, that's not what this thread is about though is it. As you said consent. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Women do get thrown out clubs for the same behaviour, consent isn't a gender specific thing now is it. In my experience women tend to ask for consent first. Where as some do not that's men women couples included. Ask for consent - sex wise?? I would hope they do. I think you are conflating this into a different issue here. So because filters are there, that justifies and excuses shit behaviour, no your just enabling people's bullshit by saying that. Where is the ownership and accountability for deciding to behave in a certain manner... Mr Both women and couples have said they are not offended. Even the OP has said is part of the territory, that this thread has escalated. Unless you want a complete block on sending explicit material, you're going to have to realise you're on an adult site. I've not excused anyone's behaviour, just given perspective. If you are banning sending explicit video, you are banning unwanted sexual communication ... how you go about wanting sexual communication, opens up a reasonably dull area of "do you consent to sexual chat", "are you offended by sexual content" This just isn't right though is it. For a start sexual conversation develops - not heres my cock now let's fuck. It's a conversation a getting to know each other it develops towards sexual stuff. Sending a wanking video isn't at all not wanting sexual communication with someone you have got on with and are heading that way with it's a unwanted video in your face. A random cock/vag in your face from a stranger isn't ok, no matter how you try and phrase it and no in no way does that mean you aren't looking for sex on here. We should be able to chose who we get sexual conversation with and sexual photos from not some slimy creep that thinks it appropriate to show everyone his/her genitals. It's not sexy. Just because some don't mind it doesn't make it right. I quite like my man's cock does that mean I'm open to all cocks in my face - no! There minging. Mrs You've never had a nice pussy message? I've have countless 'how big is your dick', 'I want that cock in my arse", that is a stater mail, if I'm to wrack my brains I could come up with a few more but point being, anyone could receive any message without warning of "good looking tits", find it offensive and report someone. Receiving an explicit video doesn't limit someone's consent to sexual content, the site itself does, and this is an adult site. An adult site doesn't change the law & of course I've received those shitty messages, talking sex isn't illegal - cyber flashing is. I can look at any profile and I choose to view that knowing exactly what maybe on it, that's on me. Someone sending me a video of them wanking over me is not on me, it's not my choice & it's wrong, simple as. Mrs Just set your settings so they can't send them, sorted, whats the problem. I never send explicit pics or vids but i know this goes on, i always read profiles. I wouldn't be offended by anyone sending me said pics and vids but if i didn't like them i may block them, easy. Its a sex site and it works both ways if you know something and don't want it you have the tools in settings to stop it happening, you can also specify this on your profile. It's very much specified we don't even meet men they have a huge warning when they message yet they ignore it, why should I stop all conversation because of the ignorance of others? Mrs No i think you can stop just images /vids Why, I like viewing pics that I want to view, just because people push their genitals into others faces I should stop using the site as I please? No, people on a sex site of all places should understand consent. Mrs " Well it would seem you can hide all site images but nothing in between so i guess maybe that isn't an option. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short. For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it. Liz. X Very true. Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this. Or Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos. Plenty of options, I’m sure. And here - legal. Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore. Consent! Mrs As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site. Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not. So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying? Mrs No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal. I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it. Do you understand a ? That's me asking the question so I can understand. The woman who like them and consent to them all good, that's not what this thread is about though is it. As you said consent. Mrs " Just to quote yourself "They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site" is a load of bollocks. Being here I do not imply consent for your cock in my inbox Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's worth remembering that someone was recently prosecuted for sending such unsolicited images on social media. Many may be of the assumption that the laws concerning such behaviour don't apply here because of the nature of the site, however, I disagree, and, more importantly, I would imagine that the law would also disagree and it all comes down to that most important issue that is 'consent' - which everyone using fab should be more than well aware of. Having such pictures on your profile is one thing, and largely accepted but sending someone such images that they haven't asked for is completely different. " Well said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's worth remembering that someone was recently prosecuted for sending such unsolicited images on social media. Many may be of the assumption that the laws concerning such behaviour don't apply here because of the nature of the site, however, I disagree, and, more importantly, I would imagine that the law would also disagree and it all comes down to that most important issue that is 'consent' - which everyone using fab should be more than well aware of. Having such pictures on your profile is one thing, and largely accepted but sending someone such images that they haven't asked for is completely different. " Very well said, this site isn't exempt from the law. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short. For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it. Liz. X Very true. Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this. Or Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos. Plenty of options, I’m sure. And here - legal. Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore. Consent! Mrs As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site. Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not. So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying? Mrs No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal. I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it. Do you understand a ? That's me asking the question so I can understand. The woman who like them and consent to them all good, that's not what this thread is about though is it. As you said consent. Mrs Just to quote yourself "They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site" is a load of bollocks. Being here I do not imply consent for your cock in my inbox Mrs " You’ve taken that small potion and quoted it without all the additional context, though. Wet disingenuous. One more time because I know you’re trying very hard to push back on anyone who disagrees with you. SOME women, as evidence by forum posts, DO NOT explicitly give consent but like getting photos and videos. They DO NOT spell this out in their bio or in the forums because, presumably, they understand it’s implicitly assumed reasonable due to the nature of the site. Others, like yourself do not want cocks in their inbox, therefore you need to explicitly tell people not to. If we had a technical control in place, like a blurring feature that a user could control to prevent those pictures/videos being seen within the inbox we could cater for people who DO NOT EXPLICITLY have to tell people or ‘care’ - for a lack of a better word - about their preference vs those who do. An administrative control such as a box to tick saying “yes, I want to see your dicks in my inbox” could work I’m and if they break these trust they could be kicked off the site and face prosecution. I’m all for catering for everyone. People who don’t mind and don’t need to spell it out and those who do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I …. ….. I hear that, but if one person who sees it being called out, and realises that it’s not okay, or that people are not alright with it. And they then amend their behaviour going forward. Then that's a success right. I'd ask yourself the question Woody, why does it bother you so much? ..... Mr " I can answer that. I play online gaming, (stay with me here) Often when playing online, somebody somewhere has found an exploit in that game where is they can do a certain thing a certain way and they’re able to win or score or shoot you every time. It’s a glitch. I won’t do it because I like to play fairly, but there are some people out there that will do it every single time knowing it will piss you off. Which means there are some wankers who will exploit the game and they get off on it. And I often use the words ‘hate the game, not the player!’ Because it doesn’t quite work with what this thread is about, I play by the rules because I have integrity and morals….. as a gamer….. and also by being on Fab and respecting other people. but some people don’t, and that’s why they patch those glitches. Does that even make sense? haha. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! " Report and block. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short. For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it. Liz. X Very true. Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this. Or Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos. Plenty of options, I’m sure. And here - legal. Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore. Consent! Mrs As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site. Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not. So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying? Mrs No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal. I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it. Do you understand a ? That's me asking the question so I can understand. The woman who like them and consent to them all good, that's not what this thread is about though is it. As you said consent. Mrs Just to quote yourself "They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site" is a load of bollocks. Being here I do not imply consent for your cock in my inbox Mrs You’ve taken that small potion and quoted it without all the additional context, though. Wet disingenuous. One more time because I know you’re trying very hard to push back on anyone who disagrees with you. SOME women, as evidence by forum posts, DO NOT explicitly give consent but like getting photos and videos. They DO NOT spell this out in their bio or in the forums because, presumably, they understand it’s implicitly assumed reasonable due to the nature of the site. Others, like yourself do not want cocks in their inbox, therefore you need to explicitly tell people not to. If we had a technical control in place, like a blurring feature that a user could control to prevent those pictures/videos being seen within the inbox we could cater for people who DO NOT EXPLICITLY have to tell people or ‘care’ - for a lack of a better word - about their preference vs those who do. An administrative control such as a box to tick saying “yes, I want to see your dicks in my inbox” could work I’m and if they break these trust they could be kicked off the site and face prosecution. I’m all for catering for everyone. People who don’t mind and don’t need to spell it out and those who do. " Consent is never implied it can only be explicitly given! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short. For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it. Liz. X Very true. Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this. Or Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos. Plenty of options, I’m sure. And here - legal. Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore. Consent! Mrs As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site. Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not. So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying? Mrs No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal. I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it. Do you understand a ? That's me asking the question so I can understand. The woman who like them and consent to them all good, that's not what this thread is about though is it. As you said consent. Mrs Just to quote yourself "They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site" is a load of bollocks. Being here I do not imply consent for your cock in my inbox Mrs You’ve taken that small potion and quoted it without all the additional context, though. Wet disingenuous. One more time because I know you’re trying very hard to push back on anyone who disagrees with you. SOME women, as evidence by forum posts, DO NOT explicitly give consent but like getting photos and videos. They DO NOT spell this out in their bio or in the forums because, presumably, they understand it’s implicitly assumed reasonable due to the nature of the site. Others, like yourself do not want cocks in their inbox, therefore you need to explicitly tell people not to. If we had a technical control in place, like a blurring feature that a user could control to prevent those pictures/videos being seen within the inbox we could cater for people who DO NOT EXPLICITLY have to tell people or ‘care’ - for a lack of a better word - about their preference vs those who do. An administrative control such as a box to tick saying “yes, I want to see your dicks in my inbox” could work I’m and if they break these trust they could be kicked off the site and face prosecution. I’m all for catering for everyone. People who don’t mind and don’t need to spell it out and those who do. " let's get all shouty shall we I DO NOTE IN MY PROFILE TWICE I don't want to see your cock I ALSO DONT MEET MEN! Where have I implied that's ok. No not one person on here implies consent because they are here or because they posted on a forum, just because there ok with some cocks doesn't mean they want ANYONE'S cock. If people wanna see it they'll ask. WHY IS IT SO HARD NOT TO FLASH YOUR COCK AT STRANGERS? is that better. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oops a few typos there (silly autocorrect)" Welcome to my life mate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Tell that to the women on here that say they enjoy receiving them who have not explicitly stated as such." Do let us know how you get on using that defence in court | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fab is such funny old site. There is this thread, where people are reporting others for sending unsolicited videos and at the same time another thread where women state they enjoy receiving inbox messages from guys taking pictures of their dicks over their photos. Perhaps we should have tick box to say “Yes, send me pictures” / “No, not send pictures until we have chatted” / “No, don’t send pictures unless I ask” That way there is no confusion. But sadly that would entail reading a profile and that's where many men and women (with class or not) fall short. For me, I consent on this swingers site, not in the real world, for you to send anything, as long as its legal but don't expect me to respond or not delete it or indeed report it. Liz. X Very true. Maybe upon signing up for the site it is made clear that you may receive pic/videos of a naughty (but legal) nature and signing up for this site you are agreeing to this. Or Implement a control for a user to blur/block incoming photos/videos. Plenty of options, I’m sure. And here - legal. Cyber flashing isn't legal anymore. Consent! Mrs As I said, there is another thread going on whereby women say they enjoy receiving inbox photos from guys doing all sorts of things cum tributes etc. They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site. Options like I have described could help both people who don’t mind receiving that type of content and people who do not. So it's implied I want your cock in my inbox because I'm here that's what your saying? Mrs No, of course it isn’t. Clearly you didn’t read what I wrote, did you. If you did, you wouldn’t have replied with that ridiculous rebuttal. I’ll write it again, a little differently so you can understand. Check the forums, there are threads going on right now where women say they enjoy receiving those type of photos, who have not explicitly stated they want them. We can cater for both women who do and do not want to receive that content unless they have asked for it. Do you understand a ? That's me asking the question so I can understand. The woman who like them and consent to them all good, that's not what this thread is about though is it. As you said consent. Mrs Just to quote yourself "They are not explicitly giving consent but It is implicitly assumed because of the very nature of this site" is a load of bollocks. Being here I do not imply consent for your cock in my inbox Mrs You’ve taken that small potion and quoted it without all the additional context, though. Wet disingenuous. One more time because I know you’re trying very hard to push back on anyone who disagrees with you. SOME women, as evidence by forum posts, DO NOT explicitly give consent but like getting photos and videos. They DO NOT spell this out in their bio or in the forums because, presumably, they understand it’s implicitly assumed reasonable due to the nature of the site. Others, like yourself do not want cocks in their inbox, therefore you need to explicitly tell people not to. If we had a technical control in place, like a blurring feature that a user could control to prevent those pictures/videos being seen within the inbox we could cater for people who DO NOT EXPLICITLY have to tell people or ‘care’ - for a lack of a better word - about their preference vs those who do. An administrative control such as a box to tick saying “yes, I want to see your dicks in my inbox” could work I’m and if they break these trust they could be kicked off the site and face prosecution. I’m all for catering for everyone. People who don’t mind and don’t need to spell it out and those who do. let's get all shouty shall we I DO NOTE IN MY PROFILE TWICE I don't want to see your cock I ALSO DONT MEET MEN! Where have I implied that's ok. No not one person on here implies consent because they are here or because they posted on a forum, just because there ok with some cocks doesn't mean they want ANYONE'S cock. If people wanna see it they'll ask. WHY IS IT SO HARD NOT TO FLASH YOUR COCK AT STRANGERS? is that better. Mrs " How hard is it you to see this it not about you and you do not represent all women. There’s women evidently who do not care and those who do AND that we could cater for all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Tell that to the women on here that say they enjoy receiving them who have not explicitly stated as such. Do let us know how you get on using that defence in court" I how this gets you a dm, mate. Little pat on the back you need. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"….. …. WHY IS IT SO HARD NOT TO FLASH YOUR COCK AT STRANGERS? …. Mrs " Narrator- Woody hovers his finger above the post button for a long time, considering the shouting nature of Mrs coffee, after a while, he decides not to post the childish joke about [……… ]….. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Tell that to the women on here that say they enjoy receiving them who have not explicitly stated as such. Do let us know how you get on using that defence in court I how this gets you a dm, mate. Little pat on the back you need. " Some women like it, the key word being ‘some’ Isn’t really that difficult for people to understand, that most women do not want to see your dick? I honestly despair, at the lack of knowledge of basic fucking consent on this site. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Tell that to the women on here that say they enjoy receiving them who have not explicitly stated as such." The thing about consent is that it’s specific and contextual. Just because a woman says she liked it when Mr X showed her his cock it doesn’t mean that she wants you to show her your cock. It means she liked it when Mr X showed her his. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone sent you an unsolicited wank video of the back of a totally unrelated forum post, how would you react ? Is reporting such a thing overreacting? I don't appreciate the gamut of cock picks but now it's a live one I like it even less ! I've blocked and yes I reported ! Am I being a prude lol. ! Yeah, you probably are over reacting a little bit, given this is a site largely dedicated to having sex with strangers, regardless of all the talk of connections. " Really! Even on a site like this consent should still be a given. And yes it's still illegal on here to private message with unsolicited sex pics. Just because the platform is a bit more risky than fb etc doesn't mean consent goes out the window!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I …. ….. I hear that, but if one person who sees it being called out, and realises that it’s not okay, or that people are not alright with it. And they then amend their behaviour going forward. Then that's a success right. I'd ask yourself the question Woody, why does it bother you so much? ..... Mr I can answer that. I play online gaming, (stay with me here) Often when playing online, somebody somewhere has found an exploit in that game where is they can do a certain thing a certain way and they’re able to win or score or shoot you every time. It’s a glitch. I won’t do it because I like to play fairly, but there are some people out there that will do it every single time knowing it will piss you off. Which means there are some wankers who will exploit the game and they get off on it. And I often use the words ‘hate the game, not the player!’ Because it doesn’t quite work with what this thread is about, I play by the rules because I have integrity and morals….. as a gamer….. and also by being on Fab and respecting other people. but some people don’t, and that’s why they patch those glitches. Does that even make sense? haha. " It makes perfect sense Woody.. As a gamer you only have your own dignity, self-respect and integrity. And you keep that intact by playing by the rules and fair. So, I pick up it's a felt sense of injustice... Mr | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did you watch it? Report it and see what happens! I’ve had unsolicited pictures (not videos) and I’ve just deleted them and got on with my life. Like people always pointed out on here, a message in your inbox is just junk mail Yeah and a guy showing you his penis in the street is just a friendly greeting, right? No. Because that’s in the street And I didn’t say it was alright, or a friendly greeting in here either. But it’s not “just junk mail” and more than a guy putting Polaroids of his penis through your letterbox is “just junk mail.” We should all start reporting these graphic unwanted images. Strangely the thread I started suggesting people do that got removed by admin. Look. Here is my view. If I was on a knitting, I would expect my junk mail would be other people showing me what knitted , a jumper, gloves, et cetera. Maybe even somebody trying to sell me new yarn. But I’m on a sex website, where peoples avatars a cock pics and vaginas and gaping arseholes. So I would expect my junk mail to be something similar. So I refer to it a junk mail whether it’s right or wrong to send a dick pic or tits into somebody’s inbox, is subjective. Because I know some people on here are here for that. Don’t try to twist it to say I’m (or others) are alright with it, or I do it. The thing is, every time that I post on the forums about how we should report these messages or that it’s just wrong to send them, I get messages from male people, that are bordering on abusive, about how basically I shouldn’t be on a swing site if I can’t cope with men sending images of their genitals to my *private* inbox. And every time a guy on the forums is like “meh just delete it” although he’s saying it with good intentions, what these abusive guys are hearing is “these men all support me and I am in the right for feeling entitled to enter women’s *private* inboxes with pictures of my genitals.” It’s like when you’re in the pub and one of the lads tells a sexist joke. If everyone just stays silent he doesn’t think he’s wrong. It’s the bystander effect and it gives him the confidence to do it again. If everyone around him (especially fellow men) said “actually mate, that’s not ok” we might actually make some progress. I don't have a penis, I swear. But I'm also fully aware of where I am and I know the kind of things men will send. And yeah, that's never gonna change. I don't think anyone is saying it's fine, but jeez if I was so offended at seeing a penis I'd do something about it. Block men, hide images, look at my phone behind my fingers etc. Also, you cannot compare fab to getting images in everyday life. " I don't think it's really about offence being taken but rather more the entitlement being displayed...quite literally | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I …. ….. I hear that, but if one person who sees it being called out, and realises that it’s not okay, or that people are not alright with it. And they then amend their behaviour going forward. Then that's a success right. I'd ask yourself the question Woody, why does it bother you so much? ..... Mr I can answer that. I play online gaming, (stay with me here) Often when playing online, somebody somewhere has found an exploit in that game where is they can do a certain thing a certain way and they’re able to win or score or shoot you every time. It’s a glitch. I won’t do it because I like to play fairly, but there are some people out there that will do it every single time knowing it will piss you off. Which means there are some wankers who will exploit the game and they get off on it. And I often use the words ‘hate the game, not the player!’ Because it doesn’t quite work with what this thread is about, I play by the rules because I have integrity and morals….. as a gamer….. and also by being on Fab and respecting other people. but some people don’t, and that’s why they patch those glitches. Does that even make sense? haha. It makes perfect sense Woody.. As a gamer you only have your own dignity, self-respect and integrity. And you keep that intact by playing by the rules and fair. So, I pick up it's a felt sense of injustice... Mr " Kind of. But more to the fact someone is losing (those that are receiving stuff, they don’t want to receive) to the people that I can’t teach a lesson to by taking the control off them and whooping their ass! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |