FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Kate Middleton's edited picture

Kate Middleton's edited picture

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *litterbabe OP   Woman 37 weeks ago

hiding from cock pics.

This picture seems to be getting so much news coverage, and has now been withdrawn.

According to the news, It's Kate herself who did some small edits, why is it generating such a big fuss, she just was wishing the world happy Mother's Day.

I don't really see why it's the big deal it seems to be made out to be.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago

I think because it’s edited and for some reason people care

People that care this much about the royals are so funny but also lowkey very strange.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex

Whatever the reasons photographs that have been released like that are rarely withdrawn.

The royal family doesn't officially do anything that hasn't been carefully approved first and isn't intended to send a message in line with their current pr.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman 37 weeks ago

Manchester (she/her)

I'd call it a tempest in a teapot, but it's far less important than that.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *heGateKeeperMan 37 weeks ago

Stratford

I think the issue is that there has recently been a lot of speculation and conspiracy about her absence from the public eye, as well as that of senior royals. The conversation about it on CBB only added to the controversy.

Then a heavily edited photo that lots are suggesting she isn’t actually in, shows no wedding on and some are even suggesting is AI generated emerges and just adds petrol to the flames.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago

She has been flown back to the alien planet Biden to follow soon…. Must be true it’s on FB lol

With all the crap in the world and news agencies focus on this…

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ssex_tomMan 37 weeks ago

Chelmsford

Mark Toms words. There is more to this than meets the eye

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *litterbabe OP   Woman 37 weeks ago

hiding from cock pics.

I did hear that there were speculation that it might not actually be her something to do with a mole being removed from her lip.

Even if it was a really hair surely they would have added a mole, it's too obvious not to be noticed

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ickdasterdly51Man 37 weeks ago

Lingfield

I can't really imagine her sitting down in front of her laptop digitally altering her family pics. There's enough crackpots and cranks with their views on this, little point in giving them more ammunition.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *espacito56Man 37 weeks ago

Orkney


"This picture seems to be getting so much news coverage, and has now been withdrawn.

According to the news, It's Kate herself who did some small edits, why is it generating such a big fuss, she just was wishing the world happy Mother's Day.

I don't really see why it's the big deal it seems to be made out to be.

"

Hear hear

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ascaIMan 37 weeks ago

Cheshire Liverpool Manchester

Where’s Prince Harry in all of this?! Surely he’s to blame.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago

Why do people care…..

And yet here we are with a thread about it….

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *agnar73Man 37 weeks ago

glasgow-ish


"I can't really imagine her sitting down in front of her laptop digitally altering her family pics. There's enough crackpots and cranks with their views on this, little point in giving them more ammunition. "

News quote on bbc in past hour saying that she likes to edit photos and apologising for the issue.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *adCherriesCouple 37 weeks ago

Cheshire/Northwest

People are bat shit, who looks that carefully at a picture?

She might as well posted a Snapchat filter with dog ears on with amount of outcry.

Jesus, Palace has said she's not working until Easter and everyone is playing Where's Waldo?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ugby 123Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

Another conspiracy theory doing the rounds , the internet thinks she is dead or in a coma and demand that they wheel her out to show she is alive.

I do find one thing odd though, that they have signed her name off on a post a couple of hours ago saying that she had edited the picture. That will make the conspsiracy therorists worse.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ora the explorerWoman 37 weeks ago

Paradise, Herts

Isn’t it because nobody has seen her for a while so it’s a “where is she” thing?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ugby 123Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"Why do people care…..

And yet here we are with a thread about it…. "

Some people do. Some like to give their opinion whether they care or not.

Lets not put off people from posting just because you don't like the subject.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inLemonade65Couple 37 weeks ago

leeds

It was taken on a dslr camera with a cannon lense and saves twice on an Apple Mac and used adobe pic editor once at 21.45 and the next day at 09.50

Besides the facts of the digital time stamp and editing who actually cares

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *r X46Man 37 weeks ago

Liverpool

I can't say I give a toss. There is a phone camera being advertised that auto edit your pics. Maybe she should have used that.

I thought pretty much all celeb pics are doctored in some way, especially of they are on front covers.

The classic one being the Pretty Woman poster where it's Julia Roberts' face but on a different body.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago


"I can't say I give a toss. There is a phone camera being advertised that auto edit your pics. Maybe she should have used that.

I thought pretty much all celeb pics are doctored in some way, especially of they are on front covers.

The classic one being the Pretty Woman poster where it's Julia Roberts' face but on a different body.

"

Quote - "Where it's Julia Roberts' face but on a different body"....

^^^^^^^ Jeez I always did think ..That doesn't look like Julia Roberts body..& I used to say it to people & they'd be looking at me as if I had 10 heads ha..& I'd be told..of course it's her body ..so now after all this year's I've been proven correct..Julia was quite flat chested back then but the poster was quite curvy in all the right places

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *achel SmythTV/TS 37 weeks ago

Farnborough

And then we wonder why the Royal Family despise the press!

I have just heard a representative from the National Union of Journalists say that this picture ‘compromises trust and integrity’ in the Royal family … coming from a journalist I nearly fell off my chair laughing!!

For gods sake just leave them alone!

R x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *r X46Man 37 weeks ago

Liverpool

I think it was her stunt double. Not sure how that worked out, "hey Julia, we know you are one the hottest women on the planet right now, but you have funny knees so we gotta use a double for the poster"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *abtastic Mr FoxMan 37 weeks ago

A den in the Glen

If they hadn't used Jeremy Beadle's micro hand they would"be got away with it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *umbriaman1962Man 37 weeks ago

outside of penrith

She had big opp

She got 3 young children

Hate to think what pressure to always smile be nice be on public show

Leave her to recover have private time

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *litterbabe OP   Woman 37 weeks ago

hiding from cock pics.


"I think it was her stunt double. Not sure how that worked out, "hey Julia, we know you are one the hottest women on the planet right now, but you have funny knees so we gotta use a double for the poster""

And that's why people really really struggle with body dysmorphia.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *otsossieMan 37 weeks ago

Chesterfield

It’s because they just can’t do anything straight and honest.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *agnar73Man 37 weeks ago

glasgow-ish

Convinced it’s the nanny with her head put on top

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *a LunaWoman 37 weeks ago

South Wales

I think everyone in the press/media is getting a bit hysterical about William and Kate lately. They need to give their head a wobble.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *bi HaiveMan 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

Cheeseville, Somerset

Doesn't everyone edit photos?

Or do all those women I see on t'internet really have puppy dog ears and 'cute' tattooed all over their faces........

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ittlelad69Man 37 weeks ago

clay cross

So much publicity on a photo. Personally don’t care but people just seem to blow everything way out of proportion this is the world we live in

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *annyDanielleMan 37 weeks ago

Street, Somerset

Unfortunately the picture editing of publicity photographs is so commonplace now it no longer warrants a mention. Yet it's this editing that contributes to the undermining of women's (and increasingly men's) confidence and perception of their own self worth, particularly in the young and vulnerable.

It's because of this that i don't understand the fuss that's being made of this minor 'tweak'. Surely we should concentrate more on the kind of editing that can actually do damage.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex

We'll probably never know the truth of what's been going on behind closed doors.

Personally as someone who has an interest in monarchy as opposed to the individuals within it I find it all fascinating.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *elix SightedMan 37 weeks ago

Cloud 8

I can’t believe none of you know!

There was a patio table with a book on it entitled ‘The Truth About Covid - Why it’s all the Americans’ Fault’ but in Chinese writing.

Apparently Biden called Sunak, Sunak called the King, the King called MI6. It was a whole thing.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS 37 weeks ago

Central

It shouldn't get this attention. Unless there are reptilian limbs edited out.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *heikyerboutiMan 37 weeks ago

Hinckley

It's Photo-journalism 101, you don't edit photos. No reputable news outlet will carry them if you do.

Sorry to be THAT person

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *otbeefandonionsCouple 37 weeks ago

Bathgate

The photo hasn't been pulled by them. It's been pulled by a couple of media outlets.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ittlelad69Man 37 weeks ago

clay cross

Think I might photoshop a 10 inch cock on my profile then I might get a look in

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *TK421-Man 37 weeks ago

Cheltenham

Who cares...

I mean sure, it's normalising alterations of images for public consumption in a way we should be weary of going down the rabbit hole in a society that is spoon fed information that the media outlets deem we should be interested in and can one day be used to coercively persuade us.....

I forget my original point

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *egDaySkipperMan 37 weeks ago

Liverpool

Well OP, you're literally posting about it so that's why it's generating news/fuss

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hagTonightMan 37 weeks ago

From the land of haribos.

Yes. I have also seen it, there was another sighting of her in a car as well. I wonder if that was done in the same way too.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inky_couple2020Couple 37 weeks ago

North West


"Who cares...

I mean sure, it's normalising alterations of images for public consumption in a way we should be weary of going down the rabbit hole in a society that is spoon fed information that the media outlets deem we should be interested in and can one day be used to coercively persuade us.....

I forget my original point "

Get better at Photoshop? Maybe we could suggest some CPD for Katharine?!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inky_couple2020Couple 37 weeks ago

North West


"Yes. I have also seen it, there was another sighting of her in a car as well. I wonder if that was done in the same way too."

¿Qué?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago


"Where’s Prince Harry in all of this?! Surely he’s to blame. "

Or Meghan. Seen as she controls him

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"Where’s Prince Harry in all of this?! Surely he’s to blame.

Or Meghan. Seen as she controls him "

.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman 37 weeks ago

The Town by The Cross


"This picture seems to be getting so much news coverage, and has now been withdrawn.

According to the news, It's Kate herself who did some small edits, why is it generating such a big fuss, she just was wishing the world happy Mother's Day.

I don't really see why it's the big deal it seems to be made out to be.

"

It's probably a dog whistling smoke screen cos Andrew has been seen around Woking

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS 37 weeks ago

Central

Could Cate already have been a reptile and the kids are purebloods?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago

What did she edit???

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago


"What did she edit??? "

A photo

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"Could Cate already have been a reptile and the kids are purebloods?"

Well you can't see her arms...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago


"What did she edit???

A photo"

Christ imagine if our pics were examined

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago


"What did she edit???

A photo

Christ imagine if our pics were examined "

Do you think the royals in the Palace are talking about the photos they’ve seen in Fab?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago


"What did she edit???

A photo

Christ imagine if our pics were examined

Do you think the royals in the Palace are talking about the photos they’ve seen in Fab? "

What if they are on fab!! Booom... Mic drop

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *abtastic Mr FoxMan 37 weeks ago

A den in the Glen


"What did she edit???

A photo

Christ imagine if our pics were examined

Do you think the royals in the Palace are talking about the photos they’ve seen in Fab?

What if they are on fab!! Booom... Mic drop "

Sophie for me please

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago


"What did she edit???

A photo

Christ imagine if our pics were examined

Do you think the royals in the Palace are talking about the photos they’ve seen in Fab?

What if they are on fab!! Booom... Mic drop "

You’d might have already checked out someones Crown Jewels?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lecom1Couple 37 weeks ago

Stornoway

The fact that major media organizations have doubted the veracity of the pic raises questions.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *octor ProdMan 37 weeks ago

working Overseas

There is a rumour that she had some facial injuries as a result of Wils getting handsy.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ssex_tomMan 37 weeks ago

Chelmsford

Mark Toms words.

There is more to this than meets the eye

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inky_couple2020Couple 37 weeks ago

North West


"What did she edit???

A photo

Christ imagine if our pics were examined

Do you think the royals in the Palace are talking about the photos they’ve seen in Fab? "

I bet Harry is on here somewhere!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ools and the brainCouple 37 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.

It's utter bollocks, honestly literally 95% if not higher of picture's in circulation have been edited in some way,look at the kardashians for god sake.

But kate does some minor adjustments and everyone is losing their minds.

Fucking media fuckwits

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago


"What did she edit???

A photo

Christ imagine if our pics were examined

Do you think the royals in the Palace are talking about the photos they’ve seen in Fab?

I bet Harry is on here somewhere!"

I bet Andrew is

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eeling0880Man 37 weeks ago

Pennines

Couldn’t care less

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago

All sorts of conspiracy bollocks.. who cares!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *CBoyTV/TS 37 weeks ago

Tonypandy

Who the fuck cares. Non story ..typical media shit ..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ldgeezermeMan 37 weeks ago

Newcastle

Top story on the news

FFS

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *nterracial cpl essexCouple 37 weeks ago

Essex

Crikey if they’re that excited about a photoshopped/edited/filtered photo they’d have a field day shifting thru all of them on fabs!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *j1104Man 37 weeks ago

Rochdale

It started off as a joke mainly on Twitter that something was going on with the royal family (all sorts of conspiracy’s), then the photo came out which added fuel to the fire.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ornucopiaMan 37 weeks ago

Bexley

Who is Julia Roberts? I haven't got a clue what she looks like. Absolute honest truth.

I could just about recognise Kate Middleton and I am wondering why I am even bothering to read this thread, other than because I wake up at his time and am waiting for a pee before I sleep again til 7am.

If this shite is top news story, I'm glad I don't bother with news other than selections from Tom.

Interesting that when I typed Julia it immediately came up with Roberts and Kate with Middleton. No wonder the world is in such a mess if these people are its priority!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ools1964Man 37 weeks ago

Swadlincote

The fuss is because the picture was said to be "authentic" but many people feel an edited picture with blemishes or physical features removed isn't "authentic"

Personally I'd agree with that.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *UGGYBEAR2015Man 37 weeks ago

BRIDPORT


"Who is Julia Roberts? I haven't got a clue what she looks like. Absolute honest truth.

I could just about recognise Kate Middleton and I am wondering why I am even bothering to read this thread, other than because I wake up at his time and am waiting for a pee before I sleep again til 7am.

If this shite is top news story, I'm glad I don't bother with news other than selections from Tom.

Interesting that when I typed Julia it immediately came up with Roberts and Kate with Middleton. No wonder the world is in such a mess if these people are its priority! "

It’s not ‘proper’ news until it’s been authenticated by Tom

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago

I'm also wondering what else is in the news that needs burying? But I am a cynic

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *heGateKeeperMan 37 weeks ago

Stratford

They seem to think the photo was lifted from a vogue cover she did a while ago. It overlays very cleanly……

Also the alleged mistress is, to steal a phrase from Tom, ‘all over the news’

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *elvet RopeMan 37 weeks ago

by the big field

Because the media and a large amount of people in the UK seem to worship the royals like they’re something special- instead of just a very rich version of Shameless

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago


"And then we wonder why the Royal Family despise the press!

I have just heard a representative from the National Union of Journalists say that this picture ‘compromises trust and integrity’ in the Royal family … coming from a journalist I nearly fell off my chair laughing!!

For gods sake just leave them alone!

R x

"

Bang on. Quite agree. Gutter journalism. Absolute parasites

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago

Maybe she was removing scales & tails and maybe DAVID ICKE was RIGHT

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *agnar73Man 37 weeks ago

glasgow-ish


"They seem to think the photo was lifted from a vogue cover she did a while ago. It overlays very cleanly……

Also the alleged mistress is, to steal a phrase from Tom, ‘all over the news’ "

The wee marchioness that pegs him. Jeez that’s old

The rumour William whacked Kate is still going too.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *estarossa.Woman 37 weeks ago

Flagrante


"This picture seems to be getting so much news coverage, and has now been withdrawn.

According to the news, It's Kate herself who did some small edits, why is it generating such a big fuss, she just was wishing the world happy Mother's Day.

I don't really see why it's the big deal it seems to be made out to be.

"

Slow news day.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ungle VIP 1Man 37 weeks ago

colchester

Who gives a shit if edited, pretty sure most people edit there photos. World is just a stab people in the back kind of place. Media are the scum of the earth

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uddy laneMan 37 weeks ago

dudley

[Removed by poster at 12/03/24 10:09:12]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uddy laneMan 37 weeks ago

dudley

Hold on a minute, they manipulate images, so Graham Taylor does not have a turnip for an head.

You learn something every day.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *allySlinkyWoman 37 weeks ago

Leeds


"Who gives a shit if edited, pretty sure most people edit there photos. "

Are the pics on your profile edited ? None of mine are.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago

Once again the press making a mountain out of a mole hill, who cares its just a pic of her and her children. Get over it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ungle VIP 1Man 37 weeks ago

colchester


"Who gives a shit if edited, pretty sure most people edit there photos.

Are the pics on your profile edited ? None of mine are. "

Nothing edited on mine, no filter nothing. What you see is what you get in pics and what I say. I imagine a good 90% of people either edit or put filter on. There choice if makes them feel better about themselves good luck to them, just not my thing

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex

The press and quite a large section of the population are interested because the monarch has cancer, the future monarch's wife is recovering from something, the monarchs brother has a cloud hanging over him and the fifth in line to the throne lives in America estranged from the family.

Currently the country is in a miserable condition, the governing party has never been less popular and the national mood is low.

The monarch and their family is usually used at times like this to boost the mood and chivvy us all along. Currently it's just adding to the general malaise.

So like it or not, interested or not an edited picture will be newsworthy

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *abioMan 37 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

2 things….

1) if it had been the press editing the photo, the first people who would have complained would have been Kensington palace…..

2) if this had been Meghan instead of Kate, you know the press would have gone absolutely ballistic!

And that’s my lot……

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inkster seekingMan 37 weeks ago

ponty

Who cares

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"2 things….

1) if it had been the press editing the photo, the first people who would have complained would have been Kensington palace…..

2) if this had been Meghan instead of Kate, you know the press would have gone absolutely ballistic!

And that’s my lot……"

Succint, pertinent and pithy

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *agnar73Man 37 weeks ago

glasgow-ish


"2 things….

1) if it had been the press editing the photo, the first people who would have complained would have been Kensington palace…..

2) if this had been Meghan instead of Kate, you know the press would have gone absolutely ballistic!

And that’s my lot……

Succint, pertinent and pithy "

I’d add the the AP as a syndicate that uses pics obviously know or have photographers that have seen Kate recently and know what state she’s in, so I’m sure they weren’t trying for the Streisand effect my making the statement but sure as hell have created a story from nothing

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *allySlinkyWoman 37 weeks ago

Leeds


"

Succint, pertinent and pithy "

Are you rating Fabio's cock ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"

Succint, pertinent and pithy

Are you rating Fabio's cock ? "

.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex

I'm also wondering why everyone keeps referring to the Princess of Wales and the Duchess of Sussex by their maiden names. I even hear talk of Lady Di.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago

Who cares?

This is a swingers site

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago

Not interested in the royal family.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *allySlinkyWoman 37 weeks ago

Leeds


"Who cares?

This is a swingers site"

I think this site would be a boring place if only swinging issues were discussed. I get hours of pleasure from the "change a letter" word games.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *allySlinkyWoman 37 weeks ago

Leeds


"Not interested in the royal family. "

So why click on this thread ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 37 weeks ago

My point of view. Generally boring content on here.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *allySlinkyWoman 37 weeks ago

Leeds


"My point of view. Generally boring content on here. "

Perhaps you could start a thread on a topic which interests you ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ascaIMan 37 weeks ago

Cheshire Liverpool Manchester


"My point of view. Generally boring content on here. "

Completely agree, they’re so dull on here. I’m glad your post had me on the edge of my seat.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ark RumMan 37 weeks ago

Bucks

Couldn't really give a fuck to be honest

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ornucopiaMan 37 weeks ago

Bexley


"I'm also wondering why everyone keeps referring to the Princess of Wales and the Duchess of Sussex by their maiden names. I even hear talk of Lady Di. "

Could it be that most people would probably be hard pressed to call to mind the proper titles of these 'niche celebrities'?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *r_reusMan 37 weeks ago

Coventry

Listening to a podcast about it now, sounds like some dodgy stuff going on?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *allySlinkyWoman 37 weeks ago

Leeds


"I'm also wondering why everyone keeps referring to the Princess of Wales and the Duchess of Sussex by their maiden names. I even hear talk of Lady Di.

"

I think because when the majority of people hear "Princess of Wales" they think of Diana not Kate.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *exymilf_69Woman 37 weeks ago

yorkshire


"2 things….

1) if it had been the press editing the photo, the first people who would have complained would have been Kensington palace…..

2) if this had been Meghan instead of Kate, you know the press would have gone absolutely ballistic!

And that’s my lot……"

Nails it as per x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"I'm also wondering why everyone keeps referring to the Princess of Wales and the Duchess of Sussex by their maiden names. I even hear talk of Lady Di.

Could it be that most people would probably be hard pressed to call to mind the proper titles of these 'niche celebrities'?"

They're hardly niche though.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"I'm also wondering why everyone keeps referring to the Princess of Wales and the Duchess of Sussex by their maiden names. I even hear talk of Lady Di.

I think because when the majority of people hear "Princess of Wales" they think of Diana not Kate. "

Maybe. It seems a bit odd to me.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *allySlinkyWoman 37 weeks ago

Leeds


"

Maybe. It seems a bit odd to me. "

When you hear "The Queen" do you think of Elizabeth II or Camilla ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ornucopiaMan 37 weeks ago

Bexley


"

Could it be that most people would probably be hard pressed to call to mind the proper titles of these 'niche celebrities'?

They're hardly niche though. "

Does nobody share my 'niche' sense of humour? !!!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *merican WomanWoman 37 weeks ago

live by the Pool xx


"This picture seems to be getting so much news coverage, and has now been withdrawn.

According to the news, It's Kate herself who did some small edits, why is it generating such a big fuss, she just was wishing the world happy Mother's Day.

I don't really see why it's the big deal it seems to be made out to be.

"

Kate's awesome

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"

Maybe. It seems a bit odd to me.

When you hear "The Queen" do you think of Elizabeth II or Camilla ? "

I think of QE2 but she's only recently deceased, the current princess of Wales and Duchess or Sussex have been around for much longer than Camilla has been queen.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *allySlinkyWoman 37 weeks ago

Leeds

QE2 I think of the cruiseship

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple 37 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"QE2 I think of the cruiseship "

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *lder.Woman 37 weeks ago

Not Local

The only thing I see odd with it is she is wearing jeans. I wouldnt want to be wedged into jeans after abdominal surgery I would want a nice loose elastic waist band, but grey joggers would probably have created more of a fuss.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.1562

0