 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Hi folks.
There has been a lot of posts on the forum lately regarding 'timewasters and fakes'. I myself noticed 7 new profiles in my area last night, 5 of which are 'no longer on site' after a couple hours!
Now, my question is, would it not put peoples mind at ease if EVERYONE had to verify their pic BEFORE being able to recieve and send messages?
Whilst this may not deter the more determined fakes, it would deter the multitude of spur of the moment ones. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
the spur of the moment fakes are already being deterred it would seem. as you said five out of seven left straight away. if they were fakes. its not hard to fake a pic with a user name on. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
I don't think it should be compulsory no.
People can filter out non verified on their filters if they wish to though.
http://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters
The profiles you talk about might not have been fake anyway, just changed their mind.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I don't think it should be compulsory no.
People can filter out non verified on their filters if they wish to though.
http://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters
The profiles you talk about might not have been fake anyway, just changed their mind.
"
Cool. It was just a thought, though maybe not a very good one when hungover, lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Hey, don't let me put you off your idea, it is just my personal opinion  "
Lol, i just thought that if they have to get a pic verified before being able to send a message, then you know at least that they are the sex they say they are! If that makes sense? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Hi folks.
There has been a lot of posts on the forum lately regarding 'timewasters and fakes'. I myself noticed 7 new profiles in my area last night, 5 of which are 'no longer on site' after a couple hours!
Now, my question is, would it not put peoples mind at ease if EVERYONE had to verify their pic BEFORE being able to recieve and send messages?
Whilst this may not deter the more determined fakes, it would deter the multitude of spur of the moment ones. "
It does not mean they are fake. They could have come home pissed and thought fab swingers was called easy shag or shags r us. Then realised it is not shags r us so deleted the profile.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
"Hey, don't let me put you off your idea, it is just my personal opinion
Lol, i just thought that if they have to get a pic verified before being able to send a message, then you know at least that they are the sex they say they are! If that makes sense?"
Yeah I know what you mean, but I think if it is compulsory then it won't suit a lot of people who don't want to pic verify.
If I am honest, although we are PV'd we probably wouldn't have done it we had to to be able to use the site. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Hi folks.
There has been a lot of posts on the forum lately regarding 'timewasters and fakes'. I myself noticed 7 new profiles in my area last night, 5 of which are 'no longer on site' after a couple hours!
Now, my question is, would it not put peoples mind at ease if EVERYONE had to verify their pic BEFORE being able to recieve and send messages?
Whilst this may not deter the more determined fakes, it would deter the multitude of spur of the moment ones.
It does not mean they are fake. They could have come home pissed and thought fab swingers was called easy shag or shags r us. Then realised it is not shags r us so deleted the profile.
"
My post wasn't specifically about those 5 profiles. It was regarding timewasters and fakes. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
Ah but you see theres the other thing...what makes a timewaster?
Someone joining a site to see what it is all about then deciding to delete the profile when they don't like what they see?
It is a possibilty.
Of course it could also have been people coming in from the pub and making profiles as a laugh, then deleted.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Ah but you see theres the other thing...what makes a timewaster?
Someone joining a site to see what it is all about then deciding to delete the profile when they don't like what they see?
It is a possibilty.
Of course it could also have been people coming in from the pub and making profiles as a laugh, then deleted.
"
I see your point, scratch that idea, lol. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
