FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Bible believers

Bible believers

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *bat OP   Man 42 weeks ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)

People believe all sorts of things, and that’s okay.

A question for people who believe in the bible.

Do you believe all of it as fact or some of it as fact?

If it’s only some of it, how did you choose?

I ask because my sister seems to have gone a little over the top with Bible quoting to prove a point, but seems to be cherry picking the bits that suit her world view.

Gbat

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *arlot o scaraWoman 42 weeks ago

Hell

There are so many contradictory elements to the bible that that’s what many people do

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkygentkentMan 42 weeks ago

Maidstone

I apologise in advance if I come across as preaching - it honestly isn't my intention.

I believe the core message of the Bible but some of what is written is imagery. A lot of the New Testament was written in Greek and they have multiple words for one English word. "Love" for example - I believe there are 4 Greek words for love.

With the Creation story in Genesis the days mentioned could potentially have been ages, not literal days.

Thing is, in our modern world the Bible is a really tough read, and there is a definite tendancy to cherry-pick as you've stated OP. I'm in constant conflict of what it says and how I behave, but as a Christian I have to trust in God's grace.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *VineMan 42 weeks ago

The right place

The bible is more of a library than a single book. I think it tells us a lot about the views of the people that wrote it but it doesn’t mean that it’s all factual.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *emorefridaCouple 42 weeks ago

La la land

"I ask because my sister seems to have gone a little over the top with Bible quoting to prove a point, but seems to be cherry picking the bits that suit her world view."

I generally think that this isn't a religion thing but a people thing. If you had someone who was say arguing against climate change they would do the very same thing.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 42 weeks ago

I'm not religious, or even spiritual I don't think...but when I was younger I was once adviced to think or the Bible in allegorical terms, as a metaphor rather than take it literally.

As it's a book that's trying to express the glory of God, than trying to be historically accurate..that stuck with me, because it came from someone I know to be very religious and spiritual

.. I've never read the Bible in it's entirety. I think I'd like to at some point, same with the Iliad, Odyssey, Bhagavad Gita

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *icecouple561Couple 42 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex

Some of it is factual, traditions and practices of the time it was written for example. I think most people realise that it's a collection of hearsay, memories, poetry and life advice that relies heavily on symbolism and storytelling to explain often confusing concepts.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eyondlimitsMan 42 weeks ago

Middlesbrough

I follow Judaism were slightly different in that we believe God is one, has no form he created the world, is eternal and is still actively involved in world affairs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 42 weeks ago

Tin town


"People believe all sorts of things, and that’s okay.

A question for people who believe in the bible.

Do you believe all of it as fact or some of it as fact?

If it’s only some of it, how did you choose?

I ask because my sister seems to have gone a little over the top with Bible quoting to prove a point, but seems to be cherry picking the bits that suit her world view.

Gbat"

Is it any different to any other belief system? People pick and choose what suits them all the time. On pretty much every aspect of their lives. That includes religious texts to international treaties.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *olfandtazCouple 42 weeks ago

Bristol

I stans by Stephen frys take on the bible and God

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 42 weeks ago

Tin town


""I ask because my sister seems to have gone a little over the top with Bible quoting to prove a point, but seems to be cherry picking the bits that suit her world view."

I generally think that this isn't a religion thing but a people thing. If you had someone who was say arguing against climate change they would do the very same thing. "

Exactly this.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 42 weeks ago

It was created to control people and to divide people .fact all 3 main religions come from the same place .

Did you know the only trusted religion is Sikh they only took the good from each book but again a made up religion .

Fact all the religious books are evil to the core I can read some quotes I won’t but shows the badness.

Jordon maxwell explains very well worth watching him for sure .

The whole system we live in is a lie and fictional

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 42 weeks ago


"The bible is more of a library than a single book. I think it tells us a lot about the views of the people that wrote it but it doesn’t mean that it’s all factual. "

It was re written that many times you are right what is fact . Like bk then there was many called Jesus it was a popular name .

It’s all fictional for sure

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 42 weeks ago

Tin town


"It was created to control people and to divide people .fact all 3 main religions come from the same place .

Did you know the only trusted religion is Sikh they only took the good from each book but again a made up religion .

Fact all the religious books are evil to the core I can read some quotes I won’t but shows the badness.

Jordon maxwell explains very well worth watching him for sure .

The whole system we live in is a lie and fictional "

Those are your beliefs. Does that mean they are a lie and fictional?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple 42 weeks ago

Leeds

Personally to me it's a story book that's been altered time and time again.

I mean Noah..... Surely people don't believe 2 of each animal made their way across skys and oceans into a man made giant boat?

It seems to get cherry picked as to which parts maybe believable.

Mrs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 42 weeks ago

We are forced to follow paganism for example days of the week are all pagan gods , Christ mass is all pagan the new year is pagan .

It’s crazy

The system we live in is fictional reason your name is in capital letters on a bill or if you want credit just look at that advert experia your data self thenfictional you .

Reason when you die your a dead corps (corporation a buisness) you get divorced the business gets split in half . Go meet your strawman haha

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 42 weeks ago

It’s pretty much right to be honest I did the research and interpretations of words etc took a lot of years .

But suppose its my view yeah

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eftariiMan 42 weeks ago

Dublin

Nice breakdown.

We believe God is one; 3 co-equal persons make up the trinity. We also hold to the sovereignty and providence of God!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eftariiMan 42 weeks ago

Dublin

I'd suggest you create time to visit the ark encounter in Kentucky.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 42 weeks ago


"Nice breakdown.

We believe God is one; 3 co-equal persons make up the trinity. We also hold to the sovereignty and providence of God! "

We are all creators we are all gods

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *loscouplegl3Couple 42 weeks ago

Gloucester


"I'd suggest you create time to visit the ark encounter in Kentucky."

I’ve seen that on the telly. It looks totally ‘Batshit’.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ooBulMan 42 weeks ago

Missin’ Yo’ Kissin’

Op, Tell her to go forth and multiply in retort. Now, that's in the bible...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 42 weeks ago

Prepare slaughter for his children and the only ones that will survive in the kingdom are the Jews the real Jews above all people on the face of the earth .

Nice haha

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *bat OP   Man 42 weeks ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)

The bit that annoyed me was when my sister quoted Leviticus (which is basically a list of rules, not a story).

She said it’s against the bible to be a gay man.

But also in Leviticus, it says you shouldn’t cut the sides of your hair or wear mixed fabrics.

I just wonder why people would think one rule still stands and is important, but another from the same text can happily be ignored. Leviticus is also in the Torah.

Of course anyone is entitled to cherry pick these rules, I just wonder why you would?

I asked her, but she was already storming off as I suspect she didn’t really have an answer.

Gbat.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *tephTV67TV/TS 42 weeks ago

Cheshire

I always ask religious people what bit of the bible did God write ?

You’ll be surprised how many don’t know the answer.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 42 weeks ago


"The bible is more of a library than a single book. I think it tells us a lot about the views of the people that wrote it but it doesn’t mean that it’s all factual.

It was re written that many times you are right what is fact . Like bk then there was many called Jesus it was a popular name .

It’s all fictional for sure "

Jesus is still a popular name in some languages. Even used for girls as a second name.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eftariiMan 42 weeks ago

Dublin

Go to Kentucky!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eftariiMan 42 weeks ago

Dublin

The key is Imago Dei.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *cottish guy 555Man 42 weeks ago

London

When you think about the general levels of knowledge at the time the gospels were written and even as late as the creation of the king James Bible, you can't really take any of it seriously.

I get that it's about faith, and if you have it I'm glad for you, but don't try and use it to tell people how to live.

More so back then, and even today, the organised religions of the world were not the most enlightened thinkers. Galileo anyone?

Our ancestors believed some pretty weird shit. This one just took hold more and I can't believe it's still being spouted.

It inspired some amazing stuff, cathedrals in the middle ages were no small feat. But it also inspired some proper horror and continues to even to this day.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *aramel.desiresMan 42 weeks ago

Holborn

I'm go church but would not say im a believer. The priest is really good and his primary message is Love! There are few core principles I like to follow that you don't need to be religious to apply to you life.

Be kind, forgiving, charitable, help people, support one another and also Love never hate.

I think they have saved me many times.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *icecouple561Couple 42 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"The bit that annoyed me was when my sister quoted Leviticus (which is basically a list of rules, not a story).

She said it’s against the bible to be a gay man.

But also in Leviticus, it says you shouldn’t cut the sides of your hair or wear mixed fabrics.

I just wonder why people would think one rule still stands and is important, but another from the same text can happily be ignored. Leviticus is also in the Torah.

Of course anyone is entitled to cherry pick these rules, I just wonder why you would?

I asked her, but she was already storming off as I suspect she didn’t really have an answer.

Gbat. "

If someone has a strong faith or belief you can't argue with them because their last word will always be "faith". Some people will acknowledge that there are inconsistencies and it's difficult to reconcile them but others with simply gloss over them and tell you that unless you have faith you wouldn't understand.

I watch people who are prepared to acknowledge and accept or completely discount all the bad things Donald Trump has done but still adore him. It's the ability of us humans to believe exactly what we want despite evidence to the contrary getting up and bashing us right between the eyes.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otoBlue69Man 42 weeks ago

Stockport

I think if there was no religion in the world we would quickly invent one.

Think about your immune system. From before you are born it is working continuously to protect you. Get an infection and feel unwell, it reduces your appetite and raises your body temperature to maximise the effect of your immune system. It makes you tired, clingy towards your loved ones and reluctant to socialise. It knows for you to survive you need to strengthen the bonds with ones that will support you and distances you from those that won't.

What better way of surviving than creating a super group with shared beliefs that would support you at time of need. The best way of cementing that bond is to demonise none members.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ty31Man 42 weeks ago

NW London

I don't believe that one needs to the Bible in a literal sense, word for word. It's perfectly acceptable to cast doubt on certain aspects.

For example did a serpent really lead Adam and Eve into eating a piece of fruit? Very possibly not but it's still Christian belief that they chose knowledge of the world (and the suffering that comes with it) to the blissful ignorance of eden.

It's the word as inspired by God (and written down formally years later) as opposed to (for example) the Muslim belief that the Koran was dictated to Mohammed directly by Allah.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ust RachelTV/TS 41 weeks ago

Horsham

If it gives someone hope, is it religion really a bad thing.

Most of my elderly relatives found religion later in life, it gave them comfort when they were dying.

I was brought up a catholic, but take a very relaxed attitude towards religion, as I don't think it fits in with the current world.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ermbiMan 41 weeks ago

Ballyshannon


"I always ask religious people what bit of the bible did God write ?

You’ll be surprised how many don’t know the answer. "

Why would you ask something like that? And what do non religious say when you ask

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ermbiMan 41 weeks ago

Ballyshannon


"If it gives someone hope, is it religion really a bad thing.

Most of my elderly relatives found religion later in life, it gave them comfort when they were dying.

I was brought up a catholic, but take a very relaxed attitude towards religion, as I don't think it fits in with the current world."

It's not that it doesn't fit in, it's more that people choose to take their own path with religion as less significant in their lives. Consumerism and individualism have risen above with the person being the most important thing. People make their own choice to suit them and make any belief system irrelevant or lesser to their thought or choice.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oubleswing2019Man 41 weeks ago

Colchester

As an instruction manual on how to ascend to divinity/ godhood, it's pretty lacking on the details.

Which, considering 1/3rd of the Angelic Host are supposed to have rebelled, tells me things weren't quite so peachy-dory and a fair few "servants" were not happy.

.

Even a God must have a means of removal and replacement. Otherwise you have a Dictatorship.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago


"I apologise in advance if I come across as preaching - it honestly isn't my intention.

I believe the core message of the Bible but some of what is written is imagery. A lot of the New Testament was written in Greek and they have multiple words for one English word. "Love" for example - I believe there are 4 Greek words for love.

With the Creation story in Genesis the days mentioned could potentially have been ages, not literal days.

Thing is, in our modern world the Bible is a really tough read, and there is a definite tendancy to cherry-pick as you've stated OP. I'm in constant conflict of what it says and how I behave, but as a Christian I have to trust in God's grace."

My attitude to the bible is similar to the above.

Any religion text generally tries (or should try) to make you a better person. That is what is important, irrespective of the religion and whether you follow a religion.

Having endless discussions on a book or chapter or verse or sentence or even a word is meaningless. I have listened to full sermons one just a word.

I have been lucky to meet people, even strangers, who are just good people.

So don’t worry about your sister. She is going through a phase. We all do. Each to their own.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *arcosaMan 41 weeks ago

London

I am an atheist but I've read a bit about the bible, you can't criticise something if you don't know anything about it.

First of all,the gospels of the New Testament were written about 100 years after Jesus was (allegedly) crucified. The stories of Jesus and the accounts of his life are not contemporary with Jesus's lifetime.

The bible, as it is today, has been edited and altered over many years, sometimes on purpose and sometimes accidentally by misunderstandings, bad spelling or mistranslation. Then the whole thing was looked at again at the council of Nicea because they needed to standardise the bible. There were lots of different bibles around at that time and they didn't all match. It was impossible to spread the good word if everyone was confused about exactly what the word was.

So a load of high ranking priests and pontiffs went through the lot. They chucked a load of stuff out, decided exactly which gospels stayed in (there were others,) added some bits, clarified some other stuff, corrected the spelling and packaged it up for use. The bits that didn't make the cut but we're worth keeping around they put in a book called The Apocrypha. It's all the non-canon stuff.

So,the modern bible is a bit of a mish-mash and even now errors have been discovered. A good example was the 17th century King James known as The Adulterers Bible in which, through a printing error, "Thou shalt not commit adultery" became "Thou shalt commit adultery". Red faces and recalls all round.

So, what I'm trying to say is,the Bible isn't exactly a reliable document. It's certainly not God's word but a whole lot of human voices all smushed together into a very questionable book.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"I am an atheist but I've read a bit about the bible, you can't criticise something if you don't know anything about it.

First of all,the gospels of the New Testament were written about 100 years after Jesus was (allegedly) crucified. The stories of Jesus and the accounts of his life are not contemporary with Jesus's lifetime.

The bible, as it is today, has been edited and altered over many years, sometimes on purpose and sometimes accidentally by misunderstandings, bad spelling or mistranslation. Then the whole thing was looked at again at the council of Nicea because they needed to standardise the bible. There were lots of different bibles around at that time and they didn't all match. It was impossible to spread the good word if everyone was confused about exactly what the word was.

So a load of high ranking priests and pontiffs went through the lot. They chucked a load of stuff out, decided exactly which gospels stayed in (there were others,) added some bits, clarified some other stuff, corrected the spelling and packaged it up for use. The bits that didn't make the cut but we're worth keeping around they put in a book called The Apocrypha. It's all the non-canon stuff.

So,the modern bible is a bit of a mish-mash and even now errors have been discovered. A good example was the 17th century King James known as The Adulterers Bible in which, through a printing error, "Thou shalt not commit adultery" became "Thou shalt commit adultery". Red faces and recalls all round.

So, what I'm trying to say is,the Bible isn't exactly a reliable document. It's certainly not God's word but a whole lot of human voices all smushed together into a very questionable book. "

That was good until "the questionable" bit. Why questionable? Sounds like a peer reviewed scientific set of results to me. Especially after all the experts got together and sorted out the outliers.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ools1964Man 41 weeks ago

Swadlincote

The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *owestoft ManMan 41 weeks ago

Lowestoft

I posted a similar answer in a forum called ghosts lol.

Personally I believe when you die you cease to exist. I believe in the Facts shown in Science from the Big Bang. But there have and still are Scientists that believe in God / Bible.

One such Scientist from the early to mid 1600', Blaise Pascal

Pascal contends that a rational person should adopt a lifestyle consistent with the existence of God and actively strive to believe in God. The reasoning behind this stance lies in the potential outcomes: if God does not exist, the individual incurs only finite losses, potentially sacrificing certain pleasures and luxuries. However, if God does indeed exist, they stand to gain immeasurably, as represented for example by an eternity in Heaven in Abrahamic tradition, while simultaneously avoiding boundless losses associated with an eternity in Hell.

Science has moved on since then and I firmly believe there is not.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. "

Noted

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago


""I ask because my sister seems to have gone a little over the top with Bible quoting to prove a point, but seems to be cherry picking the bits that suit her world view."

I generally think that this isn't a religion thing but a people thing. If you had someone who was say arguing against climate change they would do the very same thing. "

Yeah agree - all info, even scientific data can be sliced, extracted, manipulated to demonstrate your desired narrative

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. "

And those are your beliefs to which you are entitled.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *uddy laneMan 41 weeks ago

dudley

As with all religions they are the writings of men and a form of regimenting the human race.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 41 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. "

Why be so judgemental and rude about what others believe?

If people gain comfort from whatever they believe at the bad times in life we all have then just live and let live..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *alandNitaCouple 41 weeks ago

Scunthorpe


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

Why be so judgemental and rude about what others believe?

If people gain comfort from whatever they believe at the bad times in life we all have then just live and let live.."

Personally, the concept of religion seems beyond belief, but everyone believes what they believe... and nobody will change that.

In my mind, the main driver for believing in religion, is the need for "something" after death. The idea of just ceasing to "be" is scary.

Cal

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *rHotNottsMan 41 weeks ago

Dubai & Nottingham

It’s actually 133 or so books covering historic records , ancient laws , letters, songs , poetry there’s even a 9000 year old opera in there.

You can read and understand it in many different ways - textual analysis , theological or spiritual. Like anything it can be misused but that is usually a sign of spiritual immaturity

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkygentkentMan 41 weeks ago

Maidstone


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. "

More than happy to be a crackpot

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 41 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

Why be so judgemental and rude about what others believe?

If people gain comfort from whatever they believe at the bad times in life we all have then just live and let live..

Personally, the concept of religion seems beyond belief, but everyone believes what they believe... and nobody will change that.

In my mind, the main driver for believing in religion, is the need for "something" after death. The idea of just ceasing to "be" is scary.

Cal"

It's scary for many I agree..

I agree on the belief point personally even after an upbringing within the Catholic church I find it puzzling and a mystery that some have so much faith..

But each to their own, if it works for them and more importantly it isn't a negative thing for others then fine..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago

I love my bible but I don’t quote it. It’s more of a personal comfort thing to me

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

Why be so judgemental and rude about what others believe?

If people gain comfort from whatever they believe at the bad times in life we all have then just live and let live.."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago


"I love my bible but I don’t quote it. It’s more of a personal comfort thing to me "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"I love my bible but I don’t quote it. It’s more of a personal comfort thing to me "

Good for you

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eftariiMan 41 weeks ago

Dublin

Good start! ????

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eftariiMan 41 weeks ago

Dublin

[Removed by poster at 11/02/24 13:18:06]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eftariiMan 41 weeks ago

Dublin


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. "

And yet the concept of the imago Dei played a significant role in shaping your being. Refusing to acknowledge and suppress this undeniable truth can only be described as "crackpotism," a term that you appear to embrace without any hesitation, I must say!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ornLordMan 41 weeks ago

Wiltshire and London

I couldn't be on this site - a.k.a. putting myself in the way of temptation - if I were still in any way professing a Christian faith.

Others seem to manage it, but the tradition where I was brought up - and forced to attend and participate in church every Sunday - was freighted with all sorts of guilt about sex outside (Christian) marriage. Eventually, much later than I should have done, I left the church. By then I had made various life choices which would have been much better judged had they not been influenced by what was or wasn't going to offend family and other church people. But I can reconcile being here with who I really am, as well as other stuff I've since learned about other family.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lym4realCouple 41 weeks ago

plymouth

The Bible is basically a collection of fairy stories used to do intolerable harm to other's who don't believe in their version of a space monkey ??? and the jesus story was stole off the romans anyway ?? and most don't actually read all of the bible just the bits that condones their behaviour to others ?? and used as a justification to strip peoples basic human rights away ??? and reason there is more faith schools now despite falling numbers going to church or actually believing in various space monkeys ?? as just like the tobacco adverts they desperately need to recruit the young ??? as the regular smokers/god squad are dying ....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *arcosaMan 41 weeks ago

London

Questionable is a fair description because of the Bible's unreliability as a document. Being made by humans, with human faults and foibles "baked in", it's a very shaky document to found a faith upon. The same goes for the Koran but at least they have the concept of abrogation associated with their holy book to explain inconsistencies.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ermbiMan 41 weeks ago

Ballyshannon


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. "

You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ermbiMan 41 weeks ago

Ballyshannon


" The Bible is basically a collection of fairy stories used to do intolerable harm to other's who don't believe in their version of a space monkey ??? and the jesus story was stole off the romans anyway ?? and most don't actually read all of the bible just the bits that condones their behaviour to others ?? and used as a justification to strip peoples basic human rights away ??? and reason there is more faith schools now despite falling numbers going to church or actually believing in various space monkeys ?? as just like the tobacco adverts they desperately need to recruit the young ??? as the regular smokers/god squad are dying .... "

A very ill thought attack. Punitive statements meant to insult.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oxy jWoman 41 weeks ago

somerset

belive none of it ... its a book used for power and control ...

there a interesting docu on netflix i think it was about the links between the bible and ra the sun god from 2000 years before change a few words and both nearly the same ...its power make people fear then control then power ..

i dont have a problem in what people belive that there choice and fair play to them but to me its just another fantasy book ....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town

I find it strange that people who don't believe or have no faith need to be quite so offensive and insulting to those that do. One things for sure. Those who have belief in the fora are not the ones throwing insults about. Of nothing else perhaps people could believe in being a little more pleasant.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oquars19458Man 41 weeks ago

sheffield


"I stans by Stephen frys take on the bible and God "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate


"Nice breakdown.

We believe God is one; 3 co-equal persons make up the trinity. We also hold to the sovereignty and providence of God! "

That goes against 3000 year understanding of the bible by the Jews.

Goes against what Jesus says who god is "And this is eternal life, that they may know you (Speaking to the father) The Only One true God, and Jesus whom you have sent."

A man called him "Good Teacher" He said::

"Why do you call me good?! God alone is good"

So why do you believe in a 3 persons team of God creed invented in 2 stages of 2 councils held in 325Ad and 385AD? The council was made up by Bishops who apostated to Paganism in 303. The Bishops who preferred to die ruther than convert to Paganism were not allowed in those councils and were outcasted as Heretics, extremists.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago

I don't believe what's written in the Bible and I think most of it belongs in the bad fiction department of the history of literature. Having said that there are some good bits in there, Ezekiel 23:20 always comes to my mind whenever a Bible thumper wants me to belive in God so that I can "enter the eternal freedom of Heaven" or whatever the preachers of Starford or Oxford Street are banging on about. It's amazing how long those "sacred" texts have survived and how much influence they have had over our lives.

I am more inclined to believe what's written in the maths, physics, chemistry, and biology unversity books that the Bible, Quran, Torah, or any other religious texts.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *egasus NobMan 41 weeks ago

Merton


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. "

Not believing is also a religion.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *bflirtyCouple 41 weeks ago

Milton Keynes

1) Re-written 300 years after te fact by nobody who was there.

2) Less than 50% of UK population actively practice christianity so why is it still taught in schools? If most people believe it to be fiction why brainwash kids with what is essentially fake news?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

Not believing is also a religion."

No. It is not. Non believing is simply not giving a fuck about a bunch of badly written fiction that others believe to be the word of their favourite deity.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *icecouple561Couple 41 weeks ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"1) Re-written 300 years after te fact by nobody who was there.

2) Less than 50% of UK population actively practice christianity so why is it still taught in schools? If most people believe it to be fiction why brainwash kids with what is essentially fake news?"

If most people believe it's fiction how are children being brainwashed?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"1) Re-written 300 years after te fact by nobody who was there.

2) Less than 50% of UK population actively practice christianity so why is it still taught in schools? If most people believe it to be fiction why brainwash kids with what is essentially fake news?"

Schools teaching kids about religions? Yeah that's terrible. All that history and philosophy and discovery and exploration .... Terrible business.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

Not believing is also a religion.

No. It is not. Non believing is simply not giving a fuck about a bunch of badly written fiction that others believe to be the word of their favourite deity."

You sund like an angry zealous Atheist who has plenty evidence God doesn't exist. If that's not religion then what is? Lol

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ty31Man 41 weeks ago

NW London


"1) Re-written 300 years after te fact by nobody who was there.

2) Less than 50% of UK population actively practice christianity so why is it still taught in schools? If most people believe it to be fiction why brainwash kids with what is essentially fake news?"

Far less than 50% of the population identify as being anywhere on the LGBTQ+ spectrum but imagine the uproar if kids weren't taught about those that do.

Regardless of whether you identify as person of faith or an atheist it's still very important to teach religion in schools. Understanding about other faiths, cultures and customs is very important for a respectful, understanding society.

And as for brainwashing with fake news, I'd say that the media is far more guilty of this- I'd rather kids learn lessons from faith than about materialism, jingoism and blind patriotism.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *rialbyfire1235Man 41 weeks ago

South KK

‘We’re Christians buddy, we don’t like what you said’

‘Then forgive me.’

- Bill Hicks

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ssex_tomMan 41 weeks ago

Chelmsford

The Bible is comfort to many and why deprive them.of that comfort. It's a belief system for many and a coping system..

Global warming being one. Enough scare mongering going on. If a person can find peace in the sacred text then good luck to them

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ermbiMan 41 weeks ago

Ballyshannon


"1) Re-written 300 years after te fact by nobody who was there.

2) Less than 50% of UK population actively practice christianity so why is it still taught in schools? If most people believe it to be fiction why brainwash kids with what is essentially fake news?"

People choose to send their children to a religious ethos school. They are taught, not brainwashed. Far more frivolous brainwashing going on daily through various mediums.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

Not believing is also a religion.

No. It is not. Non believing is simply not giving a fuck about a bunch of badly written fiction that others believe to be the word of their favourite deity.

You sund like an angry zealous Atheist who has plenty evidence God doesn't exist. If that's not religion then what is? Lol"

Wrong again. I have no proof for the existence of gods or against it. I just don't care.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ddie1966Man 41 weeks ago

Paper Town Central, Essex.

Personally, I don't believe much of the bible.

A great deal has been lost in translation and even more been embellished and forgotten due to handing down via word of mouth.

However, I do believe there are some rules we should aspire to follow where possible and practicable.

If the question was "do you believe in God" then that's something theologians will continue to argue for centuries to come. I listen to my heart on that one, but was told by my regimental padre that in the end, everyone will accept god.

Until that day, first and foremost, I'll continue to believe in myself.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ssex_tomMan 41 weeks ago

Chelmsford

There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it"

There is a difference. An ill religious person goes to see a GP instead of a vicar. There are clearly limits to faith and all believers and non-believers will take two paracetamol to relieve a headache rather than recite the Rosary. So, science is generally proven to work regardless if you "believe" in it whereas religion doesn't work even for the believers. So, it is a waste of time. At least for me.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ldgeezermeMan 41 weeks ago

Newcastle


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it"

A basic tenet of science is that any aspect of it can be disproved if an alternative is found

Is that true of any religion?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

Not believing is also a religion.

No. It is not. Non believing is simply not giving a fuck about a bunch of badly written fiction that others believe to be the word of their favourite deity.

You sund like an angry zealous Atheist who has plenty evidence God doesn't exist. If that's not religion then what is? Lol

Wrong again. I have no proof for the existence of gods or against it. I just don't care. "

That's quite a radical shift in your beliefs after a couple comments!

Aren't the following your own words? :

"there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *irexMan 41 weeks ago

Hertford


"belive none of it ... its a book used for power and control ...

there a interesting docu on netflix i think it was about the links between the bible and ra the sun god from 2000 years before change a few words and both nearly the same ...its power make people fear then control then power ..

i dont have a problem in what people belive that there choice and fair play to them but to me its just another fantasy book .... "

What Foxy said. All religion is a form of social control based on irrational fear - and it’s a way for many to make shed loads of money too - the Vatican is a prime example of that. Governments love religion because it saves them a job.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *arcosaMan 41 weeks ago

London


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it"

I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith.

That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it.

I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *iltsTSgirlTV/TS 41 weeks ago

chichester

Does Gandalf win in the end

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it

I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith.

That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it.

I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you."

I mean I admire your argument. But to think and say that all science is perfect and fact based is nonsense. It's been proven time and again that peer reviewed science papers that are funded by agendas are less than truthful. Fundamentally in its purist form I'd probably agree. But some aspects of "science" have been so corrupted by greedy scientists in the quest for ego or cash. And that's ignoring the fact that beliefs and culture are not welded to science at all. They touch the soul and emotions which thankfully have not been scientised yet.

There's a reason why some people when on their death bed say send for the priest/imam/rabbi.its to provide comfort and belief that science on its own can't.

Lastly. It really isn't a contest between fact and science and belief systems. They can happily Co exist and add value to our lives. So long as people stop trying to insult and attack others who dont share the same beliefs.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *alandNitaCouple 41 weeks ago

Scunthorpe


"It's been proven time and again that peer reviewed science papers that are funded by agendas are less than truthful."

Can you please provide some "peer reviewed" proof of this?

Cal

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it

I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith.

That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it.

I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you."

I have to comment on your plus points for religion

Art and beauty are not the result of religion the are the result of talented humans

Giving comfort to people through lies is never a good thing, do you think mediums are a good thing?

Supportive communities are made up of decent caring people of any creed or none

The morals of religion are anything but good, crusades, inquisition, child abuse, sharia laws, genital mutilation etc etc

Good deeds, not harming others, see above

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"I'd suggest you create time to visit the ark encounter in Kentucky."

Is this similar to the religious theme park where men and dinosaurs existed at the same time?

God bless America

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"The bible is more of a library than a single book. I think it tells us a lot about the views of the people that wrote it but it doesn’t mean that it’s all factual.

It was re written that many times you are right what is fact . Like bk then there was many called Jesus it was a popular name .

It’s all fictional for sure

He plays for Arsenal with his mate Gabriel

Jesus is still a popular name in some languages. Even used for girls as a second name. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"I think if there was no religion in the world we would quickly invent one.

Think about your immune system. From before you are born it is working continuously to protect you. Get an infection and feel unwell, it reduces your appetite and raises your body temperature to maximise the effect of your immune system. It makes you tired, clingy towards your loved ones and reluctant to socialise. It knows for you to survive you need to strengthen the bonds with ones that will support you and distances you from those that won't.

What better way of surviving than creating a super group with shared beliefs that would support you at time of need. The best way of cementing that bond is to demonise none members. "

WTF ???

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"If it gives someone hope, is it religion really a bad thing.

Most of my elderly relatives found religion later in life, it gave them comfort when they were dying.

I was brought up a catholic, but take a very relaxed attitude towards religion, as I don't think it fits in with the current world.

It's not that it doesn't fit in, it's more that people choose to take their own path with religion as less significant in their lives. Consumerism and individualism have risen above with the person being the most important thing. People make their own choice to suit them and make any belief system irrelevant or lesser to their thought or choice. "

All the kids in faith schools do not make up their own minds they are indoctrinated, the CofE currently has a £3 million project designed to evangelise kids in schools and not just faith schools, wake up very few adults suddenly get religion because it makes no sense and they can’t be bullied, that’s why most people tell the Jehovah’s Witnesses to fuck off

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets"

That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets

That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t "

Maybe see what's going on in gaza right now. It's far from that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

Not believing is also a religion."

Incorrect, it’s a normal state of being

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

Not believing is also a religion.

No. It is not. Non believing is simply not giving a fuck about a bunch of badly written fiction that others believe to be the word of their favourite deity.

You sund like an angry zealous Atheist who has plenty evidence God doesn't exist. If that's not religion then what is? Lol"

You don’t require evidence for the nonexistance of something, just for its existence, this is termed burden of proof, ask any judge.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"The Bible is comfort to many and why deprive them.of that comfort. It's a belief system for many and a coping system..

Global warming being one. Enough scare mongering going on. If a person can find peace in the sacred text then good luck to them "

Mediums are comforting for people are they ok?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"1) Re-written 300 years after te fact by nobody who was there.

2) Less than 50% of UK population actively practice christianity so why is it still taught in schools? If most people believe it to be fiction why brainwash kids with what is essentially fake news?

You can’t teach something that has no proof to support it, you can only indoctrinate by fear and lies

People choose to send their children to a religious ethos school. They are taught, not brainwashed. Far more frivolous brainwashing going on daily through various mediums. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago

I am very much into standards so the 10 commandments stand prominent in my life.

12 disciples one traitor

On the 7th day God rested.

40 days and 40 nights being tempted by the evil spirit

I have had many traitors in my life. I have worked Sundays. Have never been tempted only on fab.

Thou shalt not commit adultery. Never have never will.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple 41 weeks ago

in Lancashire


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

Not believing is also a religion.

Incorrect, it’s a normal state of being"

To what extent is not believing normal, laws and rules that are not religious based are also written by people..?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it

A basic tenet of science is that any aspect of it can be disproved if an alternative is found

Is that true of any religion?"

Why would anyone try to disprove something that has never been proven?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"belive none of it ... its a book used for power and control ...

there a interesting docu on netflix i think it was about the links between the bible and ra the sun god from 2000 years before change a few words and both nearly the same ...its power make people fear then control then power ..

The Vatican also harbours paedophiles with outstanding warrants for their arrest

i dont have a problem in what people belive that there choice and fair play to them but to me its just another fantasy book ....

What Foxy said. All religion is a form of social control based on irrational fear - and it’s a way for many to make shed loads of money too - the Vatican is a prime example of that. Governments love religion because it saves them a job. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it

I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith.

That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it.

I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you.

I mean I admire your argument. But to think and say that all science is perfect and fact based is nonsense. It's been proven time and again that peer reviewed science papers that are funded by agendas are less than truthful. Fundamentally in its purist form I'd probably agree. But some aspects of "science" have been so corrupted by greedy scientists in the quest for ego or cash. And that's ignoring the fact that beliefs and culture are not welded to science at all. They touch the soul and emotions which thankfully have not been scientised yet.

There's a reason why some people when on their death bed say send for the priest/imam/rabbi.its to provide comfort and belief that science on its own can't.

Lastly. It really isn't a contest between fact and science and belief systems. They can happily Co exist and add value to our lives. So long as people stop trying to insult and attack others who dont share the same beliefs. "

Science isn’t a belief it just is and is proven to be

Religion is a dangerous control mechanism which does no good and harms millions

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago

Someone once said this, and it's very true

Remove all religious and scientific literature. ALL of thier teachings.

In 500 years Science will not have changed, because they are indelible FACTS

Religion will completely change, as its based on feelings, and ideas

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ldgeezermeMan 41 weeks ago

Newcastle


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it

A basic tenet of science is that any aspect of it can be disproved if an alternative is found

Is that true of any religion?

Why would anyone try to disprove something that has never been proven?"

Are you saying that science doesn't exist or that new ideas don't supercede older theories when new evidence comes to light?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it

A basic tenet of science is that any aspect of it can be disproved if an alternative is found

Is that true of any religion?

Why would anyone try to disprove something that has never been proven?

Are you saying that science doesn't exist or that new ideas don't supercede older theories when new evidence comes to light?"

Isn't the world flat then?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"Someone once said this, and it's very true

Remove all religious and scientific literature. ALL of thier teachings.

In 500 years Science will not have changed, because they are indelible FACTS

Religion will completely change, as its based on feelings, and ideas"

Fact

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets

That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t

Maybe see what's going on in gaza right now. It's far from that. "

This makes no sense?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it

A basic tenet of science is that any aspect of it can be disproved if an alternative is found

Is that true of any religion?

Why would anyone try to disprove something that has never been proven?

Are you saying that science doesn't exist or that new ideas don't supercede older theories when new evidence comes to light?"

God has never been proven to exist so there is no requirement to disprove it.

The whole basis of science is proof

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ldgeezermeMan 41 weeks ago

Newcastle


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it

A basic tenet of science is that any aspect of it can be disproved if an alternative is found

Is that true of any religion?

Why would anyone try to disprove something that has never been proven?

Are you saying that science doesn't exist or that new ideas don't supercede older theories when new evidence comes to light?

God has never been proven to exist so there is no requirement to disprove it.

The whole basis of science is proof"

You're preaching to the converted

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley

Amen brother and sister soz

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *arcosaMan 41 weeks ago

London


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it

I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith.

That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it.

I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you.

I mean I admire your argument. But to think and say that all science is perfect and fact based is nonsense. It's been proven time and again that peer reviewed science papers that are funded by agendas are less than truthful. Fundamentally in its purist form I'd probably agree. But some aspects of "science" have been so corrupted by greedy scientists in the quest for ego or cash. And that's ignoring the fact that beliefs and culture are not welded to science at all. They touch the soul and emotions which thankfully have not been scientised yet.

There's a reason why some people when on their death bed say send for the priest/imam/rabbi.its to provide comfort and belief that science on its own can't.

Lastly. It really isn't a contest between fact and science and belief systems. They can happily Co exist and add value to our lives. So long as people stop trying to insult and attack others who dont share the same beliefs. "

Anything people are involved with is open to abuse. I have no illusions about this. But this doesn't invalidate the science, it only proves that people are willing to manipulate data to suit their purposes. Remember there's lies, damned lies and statistics.

I've already said that people find comfort in religion and that's fine, I don't begrudge anyone their faith. But you can use science to find that comfort too, science tells us about our place in the universe, what processes are involved in death and how our death is part of a natural cycle. It demystifies death which helps to dismiss the fear associated with it.

I think there will always be tension between science and religion. They're basically both the same thing, a search for an understanding of reality and our place in it. The methods used though are diametrically opposed. This is where the tension lies and I can't see anyway of reconciling the two.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate

[Removed by poster at 12/02/24 14:50:47]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey

Ignoring science and its differences in revealing truths from religion. I find how religion is interpreted is very problematic.

If any god is omnipotent, all powerful, all knowing and created everything then surely any texts documenting the history of that particular religion, the main players and the rules to live your life as a believer should be free from interpretation of man. Now I know man 'wrote' the Bible and man is fallible but God is not, that's one of the thing that makes him God.

So surely such texts are the word of the particular God for that particular religion. Although written by man, through the guidance of their God, it surely must not be open to interpretation or problems with translation, God being all knowing would be able to see this and ensure that their word is true.

So followers of the same religion could be wrong in their beliefs, even though they follow the same text, believe in the same God.

Moderates believe that there is some leeway in what the text actually states, what with it being man made and the problems of translation and the like. Zealots on the other hand believe every word was handed down by God and should be followed with no deviation from the text.

Although being a non-believer I find the Zealot approach more understandable, even if I do not believe the approaches they take to follow their religious path.

After all they all believe in the same God, but only the zealots believe that 'their' version of the same God is infallible, moderates appear to accept that God can make mistakes because by allowing man to write these texts God did not see what mistakes and problems with interpretations would arise.

So if any God can make mistakes are they really a God? It wouldn't be any God I could believe in and follow.

Even though I said I understood the Zealots approach to reading and following their texts doesn't mean that I believe in those texts.

If you take any approach that says these texts are to be taken literally, they are the actual word of God's, then you run into problems within the text themselves.

Looking at the Bible, in Isaiah 40.22 it states 'He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth...'.

So we all know when viewed from space, 'above the earth', that the earth is a sphere. But the Bible does not say that, it says 'circle'.

Now moderates would jump in here with a translation or interpretation argument but zealots cannot do that for this is the word of God.

A circle is a very defined name for a two dimension object. It's not a ball or a sphere. A plate can be a circle and if you look at it from above that's how it appears. However if viewed from the side its flat. The same shape that the earth was thought to be when these texts were written.

That may be why in Provebs they say the phrase 'edge of the earth...".

Ultimately this is the problem I have with religious texts, no matter what approach you follow in reading these texts, or how you follow your life upon your interpretation of them, it seems that there's too much contradiction contained within them for me to believe.

That's my interpretation. I think I may have a problem saying that in my last sentence haha, Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate

[Removed by poster at 12/02/24 14:54:55]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago


"I always ask religious people what bit of the bible did God write ?

You’ll be surprised how many don’t know the answer. "

None of it

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago


"Ignoring science and its differences in revealing truths from religion. I find how religion is interpreted is very problematic.

If any god is omnipotent, all powerful, all knowing and created everything then surely any texts documenting the history of that particular religion, the main players and the rules to live your life as a believer should be free from interpretation of man. Now I know man 'wrote' the Bible and man is fallible but God is not, that's one of the thing that makes him God.

So surely such texts are the word of the particular God for that particular religion. Although written by man, through the guidance of their God, it surely must not be open to interpretation or problems with translation, God being all knowing would be able to see this and ensure that their word is true.

So followers of the same religion could be wrong in their beliefs, even though they follow the same text, believe in the same God.

Moderates believe that there is some leeway in what the text actually states, what with it being man made and the problems of translation and the like. Zealots on the other hand believe every word was handed down by God and should be followed with no deviation from the text.

Although being a non-believer I find the Zealot approach more understandable, even if I do not believe the approaches they take to follow their religious path.

After all they all believe in the same God, but only the zealots believe that 'their' version of the same God is infallible, moderates appear to accept that God can make mistakes because by allowing man to write these texts God did not see what mistakes and problems with interpretations would arise.

So if any God can make mistakes are they really a God? It wouldn't be any God I could believe in and follow.

Even though I said I understood the Zealots approach to reading and following their texts doesn't mean that I believe in those texts.

If you take any approach that says these texts are to be taken literally, they are the actual word of God's, then you run into problems within the text themselves.

Looking at the Bible, in Isaiah 40.22 it states 'He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth...'.

So we all know when viewed from space, 'above the earth', that the earth is a sphere. But the Bible does not say that, it says 'circle'.

Now moderates would jump in here with a translation or interpretation argument but zealots cannot do that for this is the word of God.

A circle is a very defined name for a two dimension object. It's not a ball or a sphere. A plate can be a circle and if you look at it from above that's how it appears. However if viewed from the side its flat. The same shape that the earth was thought to be when these texts were written.

That may be why in Provebs they say the phrase 'edge of the earth...".

Ultimately this is the problem I have with religious texts, no matter what approach you follow in reading these texts, or how you follow your life upon your interpretation of them, it seems that there's too much contradiction contained within them for me to believe.

That's my interpretation. I think I may have a problem saying that in my last sentence haha, Mrs x"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it

I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith.

That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it.

I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you."

A gigantic amount of what was considered scientific facts was proven wrong by other scientists. You're claiming we're gonna make the same scientific mistakes. Loads of assumptions there. As for evidence. The 8 billion people who are brainwashed to believe "science" never saw the evidence and even if they did, they're not qualified to interpret it.

Evolution for example. A lot of missing links evidences were proven fraud.

Most People today that our first ancestors were all black for example. As if it's a proven scientific fact. When there is zero evidence for it. They're just assuming that millions of years ago the Ethiopian people were black. Zero evidence and toons of assumptions. Fiction.

The scientists have opposing conclusions about Covid19 depending on the country they belong to and its politics.

As for religious books you're making affirmative conclusion that none of them will be written the same. Based on the assumption that they are false. That's a circular reasoning fallacy.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets

That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t "

So the many millions of Muslims who died in the past 33 years by western bombs and western made famines... The genocide in Gaza as we speak what is that?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets

That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t

Maybe see what's going on in gaza right now. It's far from that.

This makes no sense?"

So Muslims being rounded up and slaughtered and starved to death in a giant camp with no escape isn't a example of the west / Christians slaughtering Muslims?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets

That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t

Maybe see what's going on in gaza right now. It's far from that.

This makes no sense?

So Muslims being rounded up and slaughtered and starved to death in a giant camp with no escape isn't a example of the west / Christians slaughtering Muslims? "

Its certainly an example of why I'd follow any religion, Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey

*Never follow*, Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *bat OP   Man 41 weeks ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)

Thanks all for your contributions, even those that weren't answering my original questions.

Just for clarity, I'm very happy for anyone to believe anything, but I'm not happy when that results in hatred or harm to others.

Sadly, with many religions, it often does. Sometimes because of the manipulation of man, sometimes because the "rules" are just plain wrong.

Gbat

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *arcosaMan 41 weeks ago

London


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets

That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t

Maybe see what's going on in gaza right now. It's far from that.

This makes no sense?

So Muslims being rounded up and slaughtered and starved to death in a giant camp with no escape isn't a example of the west / Christians slaughtering Muslims? "

I'd argue that the killing of so many Muslims is an indication there is no Allah. If so many people of his religion are being murdered, why is there no intervention?

But to use Islam as an example is disingenuous, historically Muslims have killed many of their fellow Muslims because of factional disputes. Where they are in the majority they persecute all other religions until they are driven out from any area that they control. The recent Gaza conflict would never have happened if Hamas hadn't murdered over a thousand innocent Jewish people. The subsequent death toll from the inevitable retaliation wouldn't have been so high if Hamas hadn't used the Gazan population as a human shield and hidden it's resources and personnel in civilian facilities such as hospitals and residential blocks. Islam seems to excel at making a rod for its own back.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *bat OP   Man 41 weeks ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)


"So Muslims being rounded up and slaughtered and starved to death in a giant camp with no escape isn't a example of the west / Christians slaughtering Muslims? "

Do you mean what some Jews are doing or what some Christians are doing?

Gbat

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *heRazorsEdgeMan 41 weeks ago

Wales/ All over UK

If you dedicated your life to espousing the belief that everything in the universe was created by an omnipotent giant bunny called Claude, you would be sectioned….. but somehow believing the same thing of a “God” is seen as perfectly sane.

And to use a classic counter argument from many believers…. Can you prove Claude doesn’t exist?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *heRazorsEdgeMan 41 weeks ago

Wales/ All over UK


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets

That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t

Maybe see what's going on in gaza right now. It's far from that.

This makes no sense?

So Muslims being rounded up and slaughtered and starved to death in a giant camp with no escape isn't a example of the west / Christians slaughtering Muslims?

I'd argue that the killing of so many Muslims is an indication there is no Allah. If so many people of his religion are being murdered, why is there no intervention?

But to use Islam as an example is disingenuous, historically Muslims have killed many of their fellow Muslims because of factional disputes. Where they are in the majority they persecute all other religions until they are driven out from any area that they control. The recent Gaza conflict would never have happened if Hamas hadn't murdered over a thousand innocent Jewish people. The subsequent death toll from the inevitable retaliation wouldn't have been so high if Hamas hadn't used the Gazan population as a human shield and hidden it's resources and personnel in civilian facilities such as hospitals and residential blocks. Islam seems to excel at making a rod for its own back."

Oh yes, because Christians have NEVER killed other Christians because of factional disputes….. oh, apart from centuries of Protestants and Catholics of course…

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey

All religions seem to share certain things.

They are all based upon ignorance, they all subjugate woman and they all want to acquire wealth and property.

I believe that all religions were established by the intellectual class, those unable to gain power by force and created a belief system to ensure compliance to them and their creation for the masses, including the ruling elite.

It may have spread from one wise old man of a village somewhere and then spread its tentacles far and wide,

Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ssex_tomMan 41 weeks ago

Chelmsford


"I'd suggest you create time to visit the ark encounter in Kentucky.

Is this similar to the religious theme park where men and dinosaurs existed at the same time?

God bless America "

They did exist together. There is a documentary with Raquel Welsh in it called 1,000,000 years BC. Strange they never show it any more. What are they trying to hide?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots.

You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets

That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t

So the many millions of Muslims who died in the past 33 years by western bombs and western made famines... The genocide in Gaza as we speak what is that? "

It means you can slag off the Christian’s with impunity but slag off the Islamists at your peril

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it

I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith.

That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it.

I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you.

A gigantic amount of what was considered scientific facts was proven wrong by other scientists. You're claiming we're gonna make the same scientific mistakes. Loads of assumptions there. As for evidence. The 8 billion people who are brainwashed to believe "science" never saw the evidence and even if they did, they're not qualified to interpret it.

Evolution for example. A lot of missing links evidences were proven fraud.

Most People today that our first ancestors were all black for example. As if it's a proven scientific fact. When there is zero evidence for it. They're just assuming that millions of years ago the Ethiopian people were black. Zero evidence and toons of assumptions. Fiction.

The scientists have opposing conclusions about Covid19 depending on the country they belong to and its politics.

As for religious books you're making affirmative conclusion that none of them will be written the same. Based on the assumption that they are false. That's a circular reasoning fallacy.

"

Every post you put up just proves how impossible it is to have any kind of discussion with a bigot

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"I'd suggest you create time to visit the ark encounter in Kentucky.

Is this similar to the religious theme park where men and dinosaurs existed at the same time?

God bless America

They did exist together. There is a documentary with Raquel Welsh in it called 1,000,000 years BC. Strange they never show it any more. What are they trying to hide?"

Shit I forgot about that, there goes my credibility then, thanks a lot

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"So Muslims being rounded up and slaughtered and starved to death in a giant camp with no escape isn't a example of the west / Christians slaughtering Muslims?

Do you mean what some Jews are doing or what some Christians are doing?

Gbat "

Both in as much as Israel being the 51st state and where they purchase and fund their war machine from. Israel would not be doing this without strong backing to keep their foot on the throat of the Muslim countries around them

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey

Thought this thread was a generic one about belief in the bible and what it says, not a thread for phobic views from opposing sides of a conflict, Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *bat OP   Man 41 weeks ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)


"Thought this thread was a generic one about belief in the bible and what it says ...."

None of my threads are generic, thanks.

Gbat

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"Thought this thread was a generic one about belief in the bible and what it says ....

None of my threads are generic, thanks.

Gbat "

What part of Leviticus was your sister quoting? Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *electableicecreamMan 41 weeks ago

The West

My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality."

There's some sense

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality."

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harm

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago

I have a stem degree and am a scientist and use the bible for comfort

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *electableicecreamMan 41 weeks ago

The West


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harm"

Spirituality is at the core of every religion. They can't be separated.

From climate change to the crusades, humans will seize power for profit wherever they can.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harm"

Its not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion.

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harm

Spirituality is at the core of every religion. They can't be separated.

From climate change to the crusades, humans will seize power for profit wherever they can.

"

Spiritualism is not the core of religion, ignorance, power and wealth is, Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *electableicecreamMan 41 weeks ago

The West


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion.

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x"

Zealotry is always a problem. These kinds of people also exist outside religion.

Politics and Economics are no different and exert much more direct influence on today's world.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion.

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x

Zealotry is always a problem. These kinds of people also exist outside religion.

Politics and Economics are no different and exert much more direct influence on today's world."

I agree whole heartedly, politics and economics are almost modern religions, behaving as such x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *electableicecreamMan 41 weeks ago

The West


"

Spiritualism is not the core of religion, ignorance, power and wealth is, Mrs x"

This is factually incorrect.

People are ignorant and seize power and wealth. Those people may take control of religious organisations but that doesn't change the core tenet of religion.

Every major religion started with a prophet and a message. Those messages haven't changed.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion.

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x"

There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God"

and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death"

Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"

Spiritualism is not the core of religion, ignorance, power and wealth is, Mrs x

This is factually incorrect.

People are ignorant and seize power and wealth. Those people may take control of religious organisations but that doesn't change the core tenet of religion.

Every major religion started with a prophet and a message. Those messages haven't changed. "

When I say ignorance I don't mean of individuals, I mean religions operate on ignorance of the rules. Only the priesthood can talk to their God. They enforce compliance through ignorance of the consequences of the after life. Also they make it very difficult to learn more, mass was conducted in Latin, a dead language for hundreds of years. That's the ignorance I talk of.

It's the same as your uncle holding that box in front of you and daring you as a small child to put your hand in it. You are not scared of putting your hand in an empty box but you are scared of what you don't know is in the box. That ignorance, the fear of the unknown is what all religions use to control their flock.

That's how religions could exert control over kings and warlords, throughout history. The fear that the ecclesiastical elite may be right. The ignorance of not knowing has been used as a powerful tool from the beginning of time.

Every prophet that you say started religions all professed to talk to their deity. Do you think they did that for a spirtulistic reason, or did the tell a story to gain control.

Saying you know something that someone else doesn't and saying it will control all aspects of their life if they don't listen is a really compelling way to get someone to listen to you.

Ancient Greek sophists even stated that God's were the inventions of the ruling elite to keep the masses in the field. How else could you control a population that could easily overthrow you. Eternal damnation was quite persuasive.

So it's ignorance of the unknown and control of that ignorance by a few that's at the heart of all religion

Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion.

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x

There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God"

and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death"

Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. "

I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town

This thread is like a Contest to show how little people know about religion. Yet proselytise about nuance of religion as if a well educated and informed theologian. I am the first to admit I know very little and don't wish to try to encapsulate people's religions into a couple of catchy sound bites for effect.its good to debate different corners though.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate


"

Spiritualism is not the core of religion, ignorance, power and wealth is, Mrs x

This is factually incorrect.

People are ignorant and seize power and wealth. Those people may take control of religious organisations but that doesn't change the core tenet of religion.

Every major religion started with a prophet and a message. Those messages haven't changed. When I say ignorance I don't mean of individuals, I mean religions operate on ignorance of the rules. Only the priesthood can talk to their God. They enforce compliance through ignorance of the consequences of the after life. Also they make it very difficult to learn more, mass was conducted in Latin, a dead language for hundreds of years. That's the ignorance I talk of.

It's the same as your uncle holding that box in front of you and daring you as a small child to put your hand in it. You are not scared of putting your hand in an empty box but you are scared of what you don't know is in the box. That ignorance, the fear of the unknown is what all religions use to control their flock.

That's how religions could exert control over kings and warlords, throughout history. The fear that the ecclesiastical elite may be right. The ignorance of not knowing has been used as a powerful tool from the beginning of time.

Every prophet that you say started religions all professed to talk to their deity. Do you think they did that for a spirtulistic reason, or did the tell a story to gain control.

Saying you know something that someone else doesn't and saying it will control all aspects of their life if they don't listen is a really compelling way to get someone to listen to you.

Ancient Greek sophists even stated that God's were the inventions of the ruling elite to keep the masses in the field. How else could you control a population that could easily overthrow you. Eternal damnation was quite persuasive.

So it's ignorance of the unknown and control of that ignorance by a few that's at the heart of all religion

Mrs x"

Do you realise that "Religions" and "Christianity" are not synonyms? You judge other religions from the mistakes and atrocities committed in the name of Christianity. And generalise from there.

The west's history and experience is not the worlds history and experience. May be you should widen your horizon a bit read about other civilisations and travel more.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *itygamesMan 41 weeks ago

UK

googles the new bible

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"This thread is like a Contest to show how little people know about religion. Yet proselytise about nuance of religion as if a well educated and informed theologian. I am the first to admit I know very little and don't wish to try to encapsulate people's religions into a couple of catchy sound bites for effect.its good to debate different corners though. "
If you admit to know very little how can you claim to know that others very little about religion? Just asking. I'm not saying you are wrong it's just seems a little contradictory, Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate

[Removed by poster at 12/02/24 17:36:15]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"

Spiritualism is not the core of religion, ignorance, power and wealth is, Mrs x

This is factually incorrect.

People are ignorant and seize power and wealth. Those people may take control of religious organisations but that doesn't change the core tenet of religion.

Every major religion started with a prophet and a message. Those messages haven't changed. When I say ignorance I don't mean of individuals, I mean religions operate on ignorance of the rules. Only the priesthood can talk to their God. They enforce compliance through ignorance of the consequences of the after life. Also they make it very difficult to learn more, mass was conducted in Latin, a dead language for hundreds of years. That's the ignorance I talk of.

It's the same as your uncle holding that box in front of you and daring you as a small child to put your hand in it. You are not scared of putting your hand in an empty box but you are scared of what you don't know is in the box. That ignorance, the fear of the unknown is what all religions use to control their flock.

That's how religions could exert control over kings and warlords, throughout history. The fear that the ecclesiastical elite may be right. The ignorance of not knowing has been used as a powerful tool from the beginning of time.

Every prophet that you say started religions all professed to talk to their deity. Do you think they did that for a spirtulistic reason, or did the tell a story to gain control.

Saying you know something that someone else doesn't and saying it will control all aspects of their life if they don't listen is a really compelling way to get someone to listen to you.

Ancient Greek sophists even stated that God's were the inventions of the ruling elite to keep the masses in the field. How else could you control a population that could easily overthrow you. Eternal damnation was quite persuasive.

So it's ignorance of the unknown and control of that ignorance by a few that's at the heart of all religion

Mrs x

Do you realise that "Religions" and "Christianity" are not synonyms? You judge other religions from the mistakes and atrocities committed in the name of Christianity. And generalise from there.

The west's history and experience is not the worlds history and experience. May be you should widen your horizon a bit read about other civilisations and travel more. "

You haven't read my posts then. I have not quoted Christianity as the religion I am talking about. I say things like religious texts etc.

I am talking about ALL religions. Do you know that certain factors commit terrible things against members of the same faith. Sunni' and Shia Muslims spring to mind in the Middle East. Hindi and Muslims in Indian subcontinent. Catholics and Protestants in Ireland. These all off the top of my head, involving three very different religions.

Going back further Alexander conquered the Middle East, at that time the greatest empire the world had ever seen. All the while whilst proclaiming himself a God.

Is that historically or well travelled enough for you? Please read what I say before you become condescending and insulting, Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion.

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x

There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God"

and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death"

Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x"

No. That's a western mindset. Even now. We dictate our so called "Higher moral values" and try to shove it down the throats of the rest of the world by force, invasions, mass murder, economic embargoes and man made famines, interfering in the internal affairs of every country in the world, imposing our culture on them, toppling elected leaders or assassinating them, coup d'etats ect. The west has been like this since the Roman legacy. Genocide after genocide throughout history. If it's not under the name of Christianity, it's done under the name of "Civilising the savages", or "Democraticising the undemocratic" or "Spreading our human rights, women's rights, Childrens rights, religious freedom rights, freedon of speach ... Superior values" whil

Other religions cohabited and lived in a relative harmony by far compared to the west.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *r_PinkMan 41 weeks ago

london stratford

I believe in a God, but am not religious.

I call myself Jewish as that is my cultural way (all my family are Jewish, some religiously, some less so) but I eat none Kosher, work on Saturdays and fuck with Gentiles.

I think all religious texts have an element of truth in them, but like "Chinese whispers", it all gets over inflated over time and by the time the Torah, Bible and Quran where all written 100s if not 1000s of years after these events happened.

If I am honest to myself, I believe in a god for my own selfish reasons and it is comforting to me to believe in an after life and that there are spirits "up there" looking out for me.

Religion annoys me as all religions say only their religion is going to heaven, which is bollox.

So I guess, I am more of a spiritualist and am pagan leaning as Paganism is based on being grateful for everything in your surroundings.

So basically be a good person, treat others the way you want to be treated and get pleasure out of being good to others.

If there is a God, you will go to heaven and if there is not a God, at least you will dies knowing you where a good person and with any luck your legacy will be one of love and respect.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) 41 weeks ago

In the begining.. God created man and took a rib from Adam and made Eve. Eve stole fruit. Mary was barren she bore Gods son called Jesus.

Sure family conflict and ruler demanding all baby boys to be registered. It mentions Zionists, Jews, and a whole loaf and 5 fish turned into a feast. Jesus was chastised by many for living a good life. He told stories. He performed miracles. He died young, yes, war was mentioned many times in the bible.

There are many who take wrong paths in society and find Christianity the way to lead their lives. God accepts everyone.

I am never really sure if the bible is a true account.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate


"

Spiritualism is not the core of religion, ignorance, power and wealth is, Mrs x

This is factually incorrect.

People are ignorant and seize power and wealth. Those people may take control of religious organisations but that doesn't change the core tenet of religion.

Every major religion started with a prophet and a message. Those messages haven't changed. When I say ignorance I don't mean of individuals, I mean religions operate on ignorance of the rules. Only the priesthood can talk to their God. They enforce compliance through ignorance of the consequences of the after life. Also they make it very difficult to learn more, mass was conducted in Latin, a dead language for hundreds of years. That's the ignorance I talk of.

It's the same as your uncle holding that box in front of you and daring you as a small child to put your hand in it. You are not scared of putting your hand in an empty box but you are scared of what you don't know is in the box. That ignorance, the fear of the unknown is what all religions use to control their flock.

That's how religions could exert control over kings and warlords, throughout history. The fear that the ecclesiastical elite may be right. The ignorance of not knowing has been used as a powerful tool from the beginning of time.

Every prophet that you say started religions all professed to talk to their deity. Do you think they did that for a spirtulistic reason, or did the tell a story to gain control.

Saying you know something that someone else doesn't and saying it will control all aspects of their life if they don't listen is a really compelling way to get someone to listen to you.

Ancient Greek sophists even stated that God's were the inventions of the ruling elite to keep the masses in the field. How else could you control a population that could easily overthrow you. Eternal damnation was quite persuasive.

So it's ignorance of the unknown and control of that ignorance by a few that's at the heart of all religion

Mrs x

Do you realise that "Religions" and "Christianity" are not synonyms? You judge other religions from the mistakes and atrocities committed in the name of Christianity. And generalise from there.

The west's history and experience is not the worlds history and experience. May be you should widen your horizon a bit read about other civilisations and travel more. You haven't read my posts then. I have not quoted Christianity as the religion I am talking about. I say things like religious texts etc.

I am talking about ALL religions. Do you know that certain factors commit terrible things against members of the same faith. Sunni' and Shia Muslims spring to mind in the Middle East. Hindi and Muslims in Indian subcontinent. Catholics and Protestants in Ireland. These all off the top of my head, involving three very different religions.

Going back further Alexander conquered the Middle East, at that time the greatest empire the world had ever seen. All the while whilst proclaiming himself a God.

Is that historically or well travelled enough for you? Please read what I say before you become condescending and insulting, Mrs x"

You're talking about "All religions" based on your western traumatic experience with Christianity.

It's no different from a women who has just been out an abusive relationship, then generalise "All men are the same".

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *electableicecreamMan 41 weeks ago

The West

It seems easy to confuse a religion for its people

Half the people in the world are Christian or Muslim

The other half are Hindu and Buddhist and a mix of everything else under the sun.

Every religion at is core is a method to bring people closer to their God.

And if you get comfort and find peace through Allah or Buddha or Jesus or Krishna or Newton or Einstein it really doesn't matter what people in power are doing.

It's a personal matter.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ornucopiaMan 41 weeks ago

Bexley


"The bit that annoyed me was when my sister quoted Leviticus (which is basically a list of rules, not a story).

...

"

I seem to recall that Peter Cook and Dudley Moore thought that Leviticus was a person!

A specific type of person, allegedly.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion.

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x

There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God"

and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death"

Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x

No. That's a western mindset. Even now. We dictate our so called "Higher moral values" and try to shove it down the throats of the rest of the world by force, invasions, mass murder, economic embargoes and man made famines, interfering in the internal affairs of every country in the world, imposing our culture on them, toppling elected leaders or assassinating them, coup d'etats ect. The west has been like this since the Roman legacy. Genocide after genocide throughout history. If it's not under the name of Christianity, it's done under the name of "Civilising the savages", or "Democraticising the undemocratic" or "Spreading our human rights, women's rights, Childrens rights, religious freedom rights, freedon of speach ... Superior values" whil

Other religions cohabited and lived in a relative harmony by far compared to the west. "

Its been going on since the dawn of time. From the cradle of civilisation. Summarian, Hittite and Egyptian empires all fought each other, all inspiring their armies that their Gods were on their side.

Exodus tells of the story of the attempts by Rameses 2nd to eradicate the Jews as they fled from Israel.

Persians, a middle Eastern empire, fought there way west, subjugation everyone in there way.

Genesis Khan is alleged to have beheaded over a million people in a day! The Mongols were a Far East people that invaded as far hungry in Europe. Gengis was said to be honoured by his God's by being born with a blood clot in his hand.

So it's not a Western thing, it's a human thing. And it's been going on for a long time.

Some of the things I have quoted are over 5,000 years old,

Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"This thread is like a Contest to show how little people know about religion. Yet proselytise about nuance of religion as if a well educated and informed theologian. I am the first to admit I know very little and don't wish to try to encapsulate people's religions into a couple of catchy sound bites for effect.its good to debate different corners though. If you admit to know very little how can you claim to know that others very little about religion? Just asking. I'm not saying you are wrong it's just seems a little contradictory, Mrs x"

Because some of the statements put in here as fact are very obviously wrong. One such being stating all to be about a God. There are thousands of religions. Not all of them have gods. Nontheistic ones. Taoism, confucionism, Buddhism. Greek roman and Egyptian gods... There are some who are clearly very anti and that's fine and their right. But what irritates is the anti brigade don't seem to be terribly knowledgeable about what it is they are anti about. It's like... I've read the headlines in the sun for 5 years and have come to the conclusion that I know enough about all religions, all cultures and all history to say that all religions are bad and are for idiots.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ornucopiaMan 41 weeks ago

Bexley


"

...

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x

There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God"

and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death"

Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x

...

"

Some religions have more than one god.

I have a poster here portraying two gods of opposite sex sharing a swing. I think it is fabulous.

Happy to give it display space, even though I am not religious.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate

[Removed by poster at 12/02/24 18:12:31]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion.

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x

There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God"

and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death"

Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x

No. That's a western mindset. Even now. We dictate our so called "Higher moral values" and try to shove it down the throats of the rest of the world by force, invasions, mass murder, economic embargoes and man made famines, interfering in the internal affairs of every country in the world, imposing our culture on them, toppling elected leaders or assassinating them, coup d'etats ect. The west has been like this since the Roman legacy. Genocide after genocide throughout history. If it's not under the name of Christianity, it's done under the name of "Civilising the savages", or "Democraticising the undemocratic" or "Spreading our human rights, women's rights, Childrens rights, religious freedom rights, freedon of speach ... Superior values" whil

Other religions cohabited and lived in a relative harmony by far compared to the west. Its been going on since the dawn of time. From the cradle of civilisation. Summarian, Hittite and Egyptian empires all fought each other, all inspiring their armies that their Gods were on their side.

Exodus tells of the story of the attempts by Rameses 2nd to eradicate the Jews as they fled from Israel.

Persians, a middle Eastern empire, fought there way west, subjugation everyone in there way.

Genesis Khan is alleged to have beheaded over a million people in a day! The Mongols were a Far East people that invaded as far hungry in Europe. Gengis was said to be honoured by his God's by being born with a blood clot in his hand.

So it's not a Western thing, it's a human thing. And it's been going on for a long time.

Some of the things I have quoted are over 5,000 years old,

Mrs x"

You can find Tyrants and examples of genocides or extermination attempts in the east. Sure. But you can also find examples of Religious and cultural tolerance in other civilisations. The Persians weren't forcefully converting their new subjects. Yes they aimed at expanding their territory and power just like any other empire, but they saved the Jews from the Babylonians, they tolerated Christianity. Under Islamic civilisation, all the Christian sects survived, sects that were persecuted under the Roman Catholic empire. The Jews thrived and experienced their Golden age of literature and enovation under Islamic rule.

You can't say that about the west. "Our way or death" Even post Christianity.

Genghis Khan was a blood thirsty power hungry man but he was tolerant to other faiths and many if his grand sons converted to Islam after invading India, and the Middle east.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"This thread is like a Contest to show how little people know about religion. Yet proselytise about nuance of religion as if a well educated and informed theologian. I am the first to admit I know very little and don't wish to try to encapsulate people's religions into a couple of catchy sound bites for effect.its good to debate different corners though. If you admit to know very little how can you claim to know that others very little about religion? Just asking. I'm not saying you are wrong it's just seems a little contradictory, Mrs x

Because some of the statements put in here as fact are very obviously wrong. One such being stating all to be about a God. There are thousands of religions. Not all of them have gods. Nontheistic ones. Taoism, confucionism, Buddhism. Greek roman and Egyptian gods... There are some who are clearly very anti and that's fine and their right. But what irritates is the anti brigade don't seem to be terribly knowledgeable about what it is they are anti about. It's like... I've read the headlines in the sun for 5 years and have come to the conclusion that I know enough about all religions, all cultures and all history to say that all religions are bad and are for idiots. "

I only mentioned God's because the OP mentioned the bible, which is obviously the word of a God.

I am not aware of the existence of nontheistic religions but I thought that Ancient Greek, Romans and Egyptians had a pantheon of gods.

I am also aware that Buddha was not a God and that Buddhisms followers aim is to achieve enlightenment an obtain Buddha for themselves. But I did think there were God's associated with Buddism.

I must confess that I didn't know Taoism was a Godless religion because I don't know much about that belief system. Does that mean Confucism is a similar religion?

When I talk about God's I meant those that form the main religion and are worshipped by the majority of the worlds population,

Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town


"This thread is like a Contest to show how little people know about religion. Yet proselytise about nuance of religion as if a well educated and informed theologian. I am the first to admit I know very little and don't wish to try to encapsulate people's religions into a couple of catchy sound bites for effect.its good to debate different corners though. If you admit to know very little how can you claim to know that others very little about religion? Just asking. I'm not saying you are wrong it's just seems a little contradictory, Mrs x

Because some of the statements put in here as fact are very obviously wrong. One such being stating all to be about a God. There are thousands of religions. Not all of them have gods. Nontheistic ones. Taoism, confucionism, Buddhism. Greek roman and Egyptian gods... There are some who are clearly very anti and that's fine and their right. But what irritates is the anti brigade don't seem to be terribly knowledgeable about what it is they are anti about. It's like... I've read the headlines in the sun for 5 years and have come to the conclusion that I know enough about all religions, all cultures and all history to say that all religions are bad and are for idiots. I only mentioned God's because the OP mentioned the bible, which is obviously the word of a God.

I am not aware of the existence of nontheistic religions but I thought that Ancient Greek, Romans and Egyptians had a pantheon of gods.

I am also aware that Buddha was not a God and that Buddhisms followers aim is to achieve enlightenment an obtain Buddha for themselves. But I did think there were God's associated with Buddism.

I must confess that I didn't know Taoism was a Godless religion because I don't know much about that belief system. Does that mean Confucism is a similar religion?

When I talk about God's I meant those that form the main religion and are worshipped by the majority of the worlds population,

Mrs x"

That's the limit of my knowledge I'm afraid.. And yes I didn't write very well about the Romans and Greeks and Egyptians who most definitely had many gods... I was simply trying to illustrate that monotheistic religions are a percentage of religions and others are available thta have no god head or many god heads. That's as far as o level re got me.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion.

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x

There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God"

and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death"

Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x

No. That's a western mindset. Even now. We dictate our so called "Higher moral values" and try to shove it down the throats of the rest of the world by force, invasions, mass murder, economic embargoes and man made famines, interfering in the internal affairs of every country in the world, imposing our culture on them, toppling elected leaders or assassinating them, coup d'etats ect. The west has been like this since the Roman legacy. Genocide after genocide throughout history. If it's not under the name of Christianity, it's done under the name of "Civilising the savages", or "Democraticising the undemocratic" or "Spreading our human rights, women's rights, Childrens rights, religious freedom rights, freedon of speach ... Superior values" whil

Other religions cohabited and lived in a relative harmony by far compared to the west. Its been going on since the dawn of time. From the cradle of civilisation. Summarian, Hittite and Egyptian empires all fought each other, all inspiring their armies that their Gods were on their side.

Exodus tells of the story of the attempts by Rameses 2nd to eradicate the Jews as they fled from Israel.

Persians, a middle Eastern empire, fought there way west, subjugation everyone in there way.

Genesis Khan is alleged to have beheaded over a million people in a day! The Mongols were a Far East people that invaded as far hungry in Europe. Gengis was said to be honoured by his God's by being born with a blood clot in his hand.

So it's not a Western thing, it's a human thing. And it's been going on for a long time.

Some of the things I have quoted are over 5,000 years old,

Mrs x

You can find Tyrants and examples of genocides or extermination attempts in the east. Sure. But you can also find examples of Religious and cultural tolerance in other civilisations. The Persians weren't forcefully converting their new subjects. Yes they aimed at expanding their territory and power just like any other empire, but they saved the Jews from the Babylonians, they tolerated Christianity. Under Islamic civilisation, all the Christian sects survived, sects that were persecuted under the Roman Catholic empire. The Jews thrived and experienced their Golden age of literature and enovation under Islamic rule.

You can't say that about the west. "Our way or death" Even post Christianity.

Genghis Khan was a blood thirsty power hungry man but he was tolerant to other faiths and many if his grand sons converted to Islam after invading India, and the Middle east. "

I'm not saying religion is bad or not had a positive effect at times.

What I am saying is that religion can be used for evil. That's why I talk about Moderates and Zealots, it's Zealots of any religion that are the problem.

I am aware of religious tolerance, after the fact, in the empires you talk of but that only occurred post atrocities. There were no peaceful take overs.

Your view of the west seems a little eschewed. I cannot recall vast amounts of the west acting as you suggest.

Don't remember Scandinavia acting in such a way, well after the Vikings that is. Are you talking about Ireland, that's on the westernmost boundaries of Europe. Is it Brazil, Venezuela, Peru or any of the South American countries. Maybe you are talking about west African countries?

Somehow I think you mean USA in the main. It does come across as anti American and I do not think USA is a religion.

Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"This thread is like a Contest to show how little people know about religion. Yet proselytise about nuance of religion as if a well educated and informed theologian. I am the first to admit I know very little and don't wish to try to encapsulate people's religions into a couple of catchy sound bites for effect.its good to debate different corners though. If you admit to know very little how can you claim to know that others very little about religion? Just asking. I'm not saying you are wrong it's just seems a little contradictory, Mrs x

Because some of the statements put in here as fact are very obviously wrong. One such being stating all to be about a God. There are thousands of religions. Not all of them have gods. Nontheistic ones. Taoism, confucionism, Buddhism. Greek roman and Egyptian gods... There are some who are clearly very anti and that's fine and their right. But what irritates is the anti brigade don't seem to be terribly knowledgeable about what it is they are anti about. It's like... I've read the headlines in the sun for 5 years and have come to the conclusion that I know enough about all religions, all cultures and all history to say that all religions are bad and are for idiots. I only mentioned God's because the OP mentioned the bible, which is obviously the word of a God.

I am not aware of the existence of nontheistic religions but I thought that Ancient Greek, Romans and Egyptians had a pantheon of gods.

I am also aware that Buddha was not a God and that Buddhisms followers aim is to achieve enlightenment an obtain Buddha for themselves. But I did think there were God's associated with Buddism.

I must confess that I didn't know Taoism was a Godless religion because I don't know much about that belief system. Does that mean Confucism is a similar religion?

When I talk about God's I meant those that form the main religion and are worshipped by the majority of the worlds population,

Mrs x

That's the limit of my knowledge I'm afraid.. And yes I didn't write very well about the Romans and Greeks and Egyptians who most definitely had many gods... I was simply trying to illustrate that monotheistic religions are a percentage of religions and others are available thta have no god head or many god heads. That's as far as o level re got me. "

I believe my points are true of polytheism as well. Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *bat OP   Man 41 weeks ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)


"What part of Leviticus was your sister quoting? Mrs "

It was along the lines of "If a man lays with another man as if she was a woman, he should be put to death." Basically saying being gay was against the bible. (Only men though, no mention of gay women).

But Leviticus also says that you shouldn't cut the sides of your hair.

I was wondering why one rule is seen as important, but not the other.

Gbat

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ackformore100Man 41 weeks ago

Tin town

This is a view of religion. An admittedly simple one but also a different view to the posts on here claiming all religions are bad/evil/for idiots/about power and and and...

It is also worth noting that of the roughly 8 billion neighbours that we all share our planet with... The majority.. Ie over 6 billion have one religion or another... the big 4 Christianity, Islam Hinduism and Buddhism making up about 6 billion.

"People often use the word religion to mean the worship of a god or gods. But some religions do not have gods. One thing that all religions have in common is that they help their followers to find meaning in the world."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andE2000Man 41 weeks ago

Bathgate


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion.

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x

There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God"

and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death"

Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x

No. That's a western mindset. Even now. We dictate our so called "Higher moral values" and try to shove it down the throats of the rest of the world by force, invasions, mass murder, economic embargoes and man made famines, interfering in the internal affairs of every country in the world, imposing our culture on them, toppling elected leaders or assassinating them, coup d'etats ect. The west has been like this since the Roman legacy. Genocide after genocide throughout history. If it's not under the name of Christianity, it's done under the name of "Civilising the savages", or "Democraticising the undemocratic" or "Spreading our human rights, women's rights, Childrens rights, religious freedom rights, freedon of speach ... Superior values" whil

Other religions cohabited and lived in a relative harmony by far compared to the west. Its been going on since the dawn of time. From the cradle of civilisation. Summarian, Hittite and Egyptian empires all fought each other, all inspiring their armies that their Gods were on their side.

Exodus tells of the story of the attempts by Rameses 2nd to eradicate the Jews as they fled from Israel.

Persians, a middle Eastern empire, fought there way west, subjugation everyone in there way.

Genesis Khan is alleged to have beheaded over a million people in a day! The Mongols were a Far East people that invaded as far hungry in Europe. Gengis was said to be honoured by his God's by being born with a blood clot in his hand.

So it's not a Western thing, it's a human thing. And it's been going on for a long time.

Some of the things I have quoted are over 5,000 years old,

Mrs x

You can find Tyrants and examples of genocides or extermination attempts in the east. Sure. But you can also find examples of Religious and cultural tolerance in other civilisations. The Persians weren't forcefully converting their new subjects. Yes they aimed at expanding their territory and power just like any other empire, but they saved the Jews from the Babylonians, they tolerated Christianity. Under Islamic civilisation, all the Christian sects survived, sects that were persecuted under the Roman Catholic empire. The Jews thrived and experienced their Golden age of literature and enovation under Islamic rule.

You can't say that about the west. "Our way or death" Even post Christianity.

Genghis Khan was a blood thirsty power hungry man but he was tolerant to other faiths and many if his grand sons converted to Islam after invading India, and the Middle east. I'm not saying religion is bad or not had a positive effect at times.

What I am saying is that religion can be used for evil. That's why I talk about Moderates and Zealots, it's Zealots of any religion that are the problem.

I am aware of religious tolerance, after the fact, in the empires you talk of but that only occurred post atrocities. There were no peaceful take overs.

Your view of the west seems a little eschewed. I cannot recall vast amounts of the west acting as you suggest.

Don't remember Scandinavia acting in such a way, well after the Vikings that is. Are you talking about Ireland, that's on the westernmost boundaries of Europe. Is it Brazil, Venezuela, Peru or any of the South American countries. Maybe you are talking about west African countries?

Somehow I think you mean USA in the main. It does come across as anti American and I do not think USA is a religion.

Mrs x"

The Islamic expansion didn't target civilians, or Monks, or Churches or Synagogues. It was army vs army fights. They didn't forcefully convert people. They even let Christians and Jews have their own legal courts ruling with their own Christian or Jewish "Sharia law" and they certainly didn't demonise their "Sharia laws". Some Jews and Christians became even Prime ministers at different times.

The USA isn't the west on its own. It just dominates it and take the lead. And religion is not just about Believing in a holy book revealed by an unseen God. Religions comes in form Ideologies that groups people into the mindset of a collective "Us vs them" "Our way of life vs Their way if life" "Our values vs Their vs values"

It comes under different names and different convictions.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ortyairCouple 41 weeks ago

Wallasey


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion.

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x

There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God"

and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death"

Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x

No. That's a western mindset. Even now. We dictate our so called "Higher moral values" and try to shove it down the throats of the rest of the world by force, invasions, mass murder, economic embargoes and man made famines, interfering in the internal affairs of every country in the world, imposing our culture on them, toppling elected leaders or assassinating them, coup d'etats ect. The west has been like this since the Roman legacy. Genocide after genocide throughout history. If it's not under the name of Christianity, it's done under the name of "Civilising the savages", or "Democraticising the undemocratic" or "Spreading our human rights, women's rights, Childrens rights, religious freedom rights, freedon of speach ... Superior values" whil

Other religions cohabited and lived in a relative harmony by far compared to the west. Its been going on since the dawn of time. From the cradle of civilisation. Summarian, Hittite and Egyptian empires all fought each other, all inspiring their armies that their Gods were on their side.

Exodus tells of the story of the attempts by Rameses 2nd to eradicate the Jews as they fled from Israel.

Persians, a middle Eastern empire, fought there way west, subjugation everyone in there way.

Genesis Khan is alleged to have beheaded over a million people in a day! The Mongols were a Far East people that invaded as far hungry in Europe. Gengis was said to be honoured by his God's by being born with a blood clot in his hand.

So it's not a Western thing, it's a human thing. And it's been going on for a long time.

Some of the things I have quoted are over 5,000 years old,

Mrs x

You can find Tyrants and examples of genocides or extermination attempts in the east. Sure. But you can also find examples of Religious and cultural tolerance in other civilisations. The Persians weren't forcefully converting their new subjects. Yes they aimed at expanding their territory and power just like any other empire, but they saved the Jews from the Babylonians, they tolerated Christianity. Under Islamic civilisation, all the Christian sects survived, sects that were persecuted under the Roman Catholic empire. The Jews thrived and experienced their Golden age of literature and enovation under Islamic rule.

You can't say that about the west. "Our way or death" Even post Christianity.

Genghis Khan was a blood thirsty power hungry man but he was tolerant to other faiths and many if his grand sons converted to Islam after invading India, and the Middle east. I'm not saying religion is bad or not had a positive effect at times.

What I am saying is that religion can be used for evil. That's why I talk about Moderates and Zealots, it's Zealots of any religion that are the problem.

I am aware of religious tolerance, after the fact, in the empires you talk of but that only occurred post atrocities. There were no peaceful take overs.

Your view of the west seems a little eschewed. I cannot recall vast amounts of the west acting as you suggest.

Don't remember Scandinavia acting in such a way, well after the Vikings that is. Are you talking about Ireland, that's on the westernmost boundaries of Europe. Is it Brazil, Venezuela, Peru or any of the South American countries. Maybe you are talking about west African countries?

Somehow I think you mean USA in the main. It does come across as anti American and I do not think USA is a religion.

Mrs x

The Islamic expansion didn't target civilians, or Monks, or Churches or Synagogues. It was army vs army fights. They didn't forcefully convert people. They even let Christians and Jews have their own legal courts ruling with their own Christian or Jewish "Sharia law" and they certainly didn't demonise their "Sharia laws". Some Jews and Christians became even Prime ministers at different times.

The USA isn't the west on its own. It just dominates it and take the lead. And religion is not just about Believing in a holy book revealed by an unseen God. Religions comes in form Ideologies that groups people into the mindset of a collective "Us vs them" "Our way of life vs Their way if life" "Our values vs Their vs values"

It comes under different names and different convictions. "

You are confusing ideology and religion.

Islam is a religion, communism is an ideology.

And you do realise that places of worship of all faiths are found in the West. Over 3000 Synagogues and over 2500 mosques in the USA.

In Iran there are only over 200 Synagogue s and 600 Churches. These figures should be four fold to reflect the difference in population of the two countries.

But these figures do not seem to substantiate you claims of the West being more intolerant than the East.

Mrs x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onameyet2Man 41 weeks ago

chorley


"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science.

Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist.

Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad.

Neither is an all or nothing proposition.

Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality.

I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion.

It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x

Zealotry is always a problem. These kinds of people also exist outside religion.

Politics and Economics are no different and exert much more direct influence on today's world."

Yes but these guys don’t fuck your kids

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

  

By *anJenny 181Couple 41 weeks ago

Preston

I believe the bible & other religions writings are simply a control mechanism.

Along with the sense of duty for country kings and queens.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

0.7500

0