FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Bible believers
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People believe all sorts of things, and that’s okay. A question for people who believe in the bible. Do you believe all of it as fact or some of it as fact? If it’s only some of it, how did you choose? I ask because my sister seems to have gone a little over the top with Bible quoting to prove a point, but seems to be cherry picking the bits that suit her world view. Gbat" Is it any different to any other belief system? People pick and choose what suits them all the time. On pretty much every aspect of their lives. That includes religious texts to international treaties. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""I ask because my sister seems to have gone a little over the top with Bible quoting to prove a point, but seems to be cherry picking the bits that suit her world view." I generally think that this isn't a religion thing but a people thing. If you had someone who was say arguing against climate change they would do the very same thing. " Exactly this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is more of a library than a single book. I think it tells us a lot about the views of the people that wrote it but it doesn’t mean that it’s all factual. " It was re written that many times you are right what is fact . Like bk then there was many called Jesus it was a popular name . It’s all fictional for sure | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It was created to control people and to divide people .fact all 3 main religions come from the same place . Did you know the only trusted religion is Sikh they only took the good from each book but again a made up religion . Fact all the religious books are evil to the core I can read some quotes I won’t but shows the badness. Jordon maxwell explains very well worth watching him for sure . The whole system we live in is a lie and fictional " Those are your beliefs. Does that mean they are a lie and fictional? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nice breakdown. We believe God is one; 3 co-equal persons make up the trinity. We also hold to the sovereignty and providence of God! " We are all creators we are all gods | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd suggest you create time to visit the ark encounter in Kentucky." I’ve seen that on the telly. It looks totally ‘Batshit’. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is more of a library than a single book. I think it tells us a lot about the views of the people that wrote it but it doesn’t mean that it’s all factual. It was re written that many times you are right what is fact . Like bk then there was many called Jesus it was a popular name . It’s all fictional for sure " Jesus is still a popular name in some languages. Even used for girls as a second name. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bit that annoyed me was when my sister quoted Leviticus (which is basically a list of rules, not a story). She said it’s against the bible to be a gay man. But also in Leviticus, it says you shouldn’t cut the sides of your hair or wear mixed fabrics. I just wonder why people would think one rule still stands and is important, but another from the same text can happily be ignored. Leviticus is also in the Torah. Of course anyone is entitled to cherry pick these rules, I just wonder why you would? I asked her, but she was already storming off as I suspect she didn’t really have an answer. Gbat. " If someone has a strong faith or belief you can't argue with them because their last word will always be "faith". Some people will acknowledge that there are inconsistencies and it's difficult to reconcile them but others with simply gloss over them and tell you that unless you have faith you wouldn't understand. I watch people who are prepared to acknowledge and accept or completely discount all the bad things Donald Trump has done but still adore him. It's the ability of us humans to believe exactly what we want despite evidence to the contrary getting up and bashing us right between the eyes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I always ask religious people what bit of the bible did God write ? You’ll be surprised how many don’t know the answer. " Why would you ask something like that? And what do non religious say when you ask | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it gives someone hope, is it religion really a bad thing. Most of my elderly relatives found religion later in life, it gave them comfort when they were dying. I was brought up a catholic, but take a very relaxed attitude towards religion, as I don't think it fits in with the current world." It's not that it doesn't fit in, it's more that people choose to take their own path with religion as less significant in their lives. Consumerism and individualism have risen above with the person being the most important thing. People make their own choice to suit them and make any belief system irrelevant or lesser to their thought or choice. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I apologise in advance if I come across as preaching - it honestly isn't my intention. I believe the core message of the Bible but some of what is written is imagery. A lot of the New Testament was written in Greek and they have multiple words for one English word. "Love" for example - I believe there are 4 Greek words for love. With the Creation story in Genesis the days mentioned could potentially have been ages, not literal days. Thing is, in our modern world the Bible is a really tough read, and there is a definite tendancy to cherry-pick as you've stated OP. I'm in constant conflict of what it says and how I behave, but as a Christian I have to trust in God's grace." My attitude to the bible is similar to the above. Any religion text generally tries (or should try) to make you a better person. That is what is important, irrespective of the religion and whether you follow a religion. Having endless discussions on a book or chapter or verse or sentence or even a word is meaningless. I have listened to full sermons one just a word. I have been lucky to meet people, even strangers, who are just good people. So don’t worry about your sister. She is going through a phase. We all do. Each to their own. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am an atheist but I've read a bit about the bible, you can't criticise something if you don't know anything about it. First of all,the gospels of the New Testament were written about 100 years after Jesus was (allegedly) crucified. The stories of Jesus and the accounts of his life are not contemporary with Jesus's lifetime. The bible, as it is today, has been edited and altered over many years, sometimes on purpose and sometimes accidentally by misunderstandings, bad spelling or mistranslation. Then the whole thing was looked at again at the council of Nicea because they needed to standardise the bible. There were lots of different bibles around at that time and they didn't all match. It was impossible to spread the good word if everyone was confused about exactly what the word was. So a load of high ranking priests and pontiffs went through the lot. They chucked a load of stuff out, decided exactly which gospels stayed in (there were others,) added some bits, clarified some other stuff, corrected the spelling and packaged it up for use. The bits that didn't make the cut but we're worth keeping around they put in a book called The Apocrypha. It's all the non-canon stuff. So,the modern bible is a bit of a mish-mash and even now errors have been discovered. A good example was the 17th century King James known as The Adulterers Bible in which, through a printing error, "Thou shalt not commit adultery" became "Thou shalt commit adultery". Red faces and recalls all round. So, what I'm trying to say is,the Bible isn't exactly a reliable document. It's certainly not God's word but a whole lot of human voices all smushed together into a very questionable book. " That was good until "the questionable" bit. Why questionable? Sounds like a peer reviewed scientific set of results to me. Especially after all the experts got together and sorted out the outliers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. " Noted | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""I ask because my sister seems to have gone a little over the top with Bible quoting to prove a point, but seems to be cherry picking the bits that suit her world view." I generally think that this isn't a religion thing but a people thing. If you had someone who was say arguing against climate change they would do the very same thing. " Yeah agree - all info, even scientific data can be sliced, extracted, manipulated to demonstrate your desired narrative | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. " And those are your beliefs to which you are entitled. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. " Why be so judgemental and rude about what others believe? If people gain comfort from whatever they believe at the bad times in life we all have then just live and let live.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. Why be so judgemental and rude about what others believe? If people gain comfort from whatever they believe at the bad times in life we all have then just live and let live.." Personally, the concept of religion seems beyond belief, but everyone believes what they believe... and nobody will change that. In my mind, the main driver for believing in religion, is the need for "something" after death. The idea of just ceasing to "be" is scary. Cal | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. " More than happy to be a crackpot | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. Why be so judgemental and rude about what others believe? If people gain comfort from whatever they believe at the bad times in life we all have then just live and let live.. Personally, the concept of religion seems beyond belief, but everyone believes what they believe... and nobody will change that. In my mind, the main driver for believing in religion, is the need for "something" after death. The idea of just ceasing to "be" is scary. Cal" It's scary for many I agree.. I agree on the belief point personally even after an upbringing within the Catholic church I find it puzzling and a mystery that some have so much faith.. But each to their own, if it works for them and more importantly it isn't a negative thing for others then fine.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. Why be so judgemental and rude about what others believe? If people gain comfort from whatever they believe at the bad times in life we all have then just live and let live.." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I love my bible but I don’t quote it. It’s more of a personal comfort thing to me " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I love my bible but I don’t quote it. It’s more of a personal comfort thing to me " Good for you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. " And yet the concept of the imago Dei played a significant role in shaping your being. Refusing to acknowledge and suppress this undeniable truth can only be described as "crackpotism," a term that you appear to embrace without any hesitation, I must say! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. " You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The Bible is basically a collection of fairy stories used to do intolerable harm to other's who don't believe in their version of a space monkey ??? and the jesus story was stole off the romans anyway ?? and most don't actually read all of the bible just the bits that condones their behaviour to others ?? and used as a justification to strip peoples basic human rights away ??? and reason there is more faith schools now despite falling numbers going to church or actually believing in various space monkeys ?? as just like the tobacco adverts they desperately need to recruit the young ??? as the regular smokers/god squad are dying .... " A very ill thought attack. Punitive statements meant to insult. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I stans by Stephen frys take on the bible and God " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nice breakdown. We believe God is one; 3 co-equal persons make up the trinity. We also hold to the sovereignty and providence of God! " That goes against 3000 year understanding of the bible by the Jews. Goes against what Jesus says who god is "And this is eternal life, that they may know you (Speaking to the father) The Only One true God, and Jesus whom you have sent." A man called him "Good Teacher" He said:: "Why do you call me good?! God alone is good" So why do you believe in a 3 persons team of God creed invented in 2 stages of 2 councils held in 325Ad and 385AD? The council was made up by Bishops who apostated to Paganism in 303. The Bishops who preferred to die ruther than convert to Paganism were not allowed in those councils and were outcasted as Heretics, extremists. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. " Not believing is also a religion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. Not believing is also a religion." No. It is not. Non believing is simply not giving a fuck about a bunch of badly written fiction that others believe to be the word of their favourite deity. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"1) Re-written 300 years after te fact by nobody who was there. 2) Less than 50% of UK population actively practice christianity so why is it still taught in schools? If most people believe it to be fiction why brainwash kids with what is essentially fake news?" If most people believe it's fiction how are children being brainwashed? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"1) Re-written 300 years after te fact by nobody who was there. 2) Less than 50% of UK population actively practice christianity so why is it still taught in schools? If most people believe it to be fiction why brainwash kids with what is essentially fake news?" Schools teaching kids about religions? Yeah that's terrible. All that history and philosophy and discovery and exploration .... Terrible business. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. Not believing is also a religion. No. It is not. Non believing is simply not giving a fuck about a bunch of badly written fiction that others believe to be the word of their favourite deity." You sund like an angry zealous Atheist who has plenty evidence God doesn't exist. If that's not religion then what is? Lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"1) Re-written 300 years after te fact by nobody who was there. 2) Less than 50% of UK population actively practice christianity so why is it still taught in schools? If most people believe it to be fiction why brainwash kids with what is essentially fake news?" Far less than 50% of the population identify as being anywhere on the LGBTQ+ spectrum but imagine the uproar if kids weren't taught about those that do. Regardless of whether you identify as person of faith or an atheist it's still very important to teach religion in schools. Understanding about other faiths, cultures and customs is very important for a respectful, understanding society. And as for brainwashing with fake news, I'd say that the media is far more guilty of this- I'd rather kids learn lessons from faith than about materialism, jingoism and blind patriotism. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"1) Re-written 300 years after te fact by nobody who was there. 2) Less than 50% of UK population actively practice christianity so why is it still taught in schools? If most people believe it to be fiction why brainwash kids with what is essentially fake news?" People choose to send their children to a religious ethos school. They are taught, not brainwashed. Far more frivolous brainwashing going on daily through various mediums. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. Not believing is also a religion. No. It is not. Non believing is simply not giving a fuck about a bunch of badly written fiction that others believe to be the word of their favourite deity. You sund like an angry zealous Atheist who has plenty evidence God doesn't exist. If that's not religion then what is? Lol" Wrong again. I have no proof for the existence of gods or against it. I just don't care. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it" There is a difference. An ill religious person goes to see a GP instead of a vicar. There are clearly limits to faith and all believers and non-believers will take two paracetamol to relieve a headache rather than recite the Rosary. So, science is generally proven to work regardless if you "believe" in it whereas religion doesn't work even for the believers. So, it is a waste of time. At least for me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it" A basic tenet of science is that any aspect of it can be disproved if an alternative is found Is that true of any religion? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. Not believing is also a religion. No. It is not. Non believing is simply not giving a fuck about a bunch of badly written fiction that others believe to be the word of their favourite deity. You sund like an angry zealous Atheist who has plenty evidence God doesn't exist. If that's not religion then what is? Lol Wrong again. I have no proof for the existence of gods or against it. I just don't care. " That's quite a radical shift in your beliefs after a couple comments! Aren't the following your own words? : "there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"belive none of it ... its a book used for power and control ... there a interesting docu on netflix i think it was about the links between the bible and ra the sun god from 2000 years before change a few words and both nearly the same ...its power make people fear then control then power .. i dont have a problem in what people belive that there choice and fair play to them but to me its just another fantasy book .... " What Foxy said. All religion is a form of social control based on irrational fear - and it’s a way for many to make shed loads of money too - the Vatican is a prime example of that. Governments love religion because it saves them a job. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it" I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith. That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it. I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith. That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it. I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you." I mean I admire your argument. But to think and say that all science is perfect and fact based is nonsense. It's been proven time and again that peer reviewed science papers that are funded by agendas are less than truthful. Fundamentally in its purist form I'd probably agree. But some aspects of "science" have been so corrupted by greedy scientists in the quest for ego or cash. And that's ignoring the fact that beliefs and culture are not welded to science at all. They touch the soul and emotions which thankfully have not been scientised yet. There's a reason why some people when on their death bed say send for the priest/imam/rabbi.its to provide comfort and belief that science on its own can't. Lastly. It really isn't a contest between fact and science and belief systems. They can happily Co exist and add value to our lives. So long as people stop trying to insult and attack others who dont share the same beliefs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's been proven time and again that peer reviewed science papers that are funded by agendas are less than truthful." Can you please provide some "peer reviewed" proof of this? Cal | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith. That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it. I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you." I have to comment on your plus points for religion Art and beauty are not the result of religion the are the result of talented humans Giving comfort to people through lies is never a good thing, do you think mediums are a good thing? Supportive communities are made up of decent caring people of any creed or none The morals of religion are anything but good, crusades, inquisition, child abuse, sharia laws, genital mutilation etc etc Good deeds, not harming others, see above | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd suggest you create time to visit the ark encounter in Kentucky." Is this similar to the religious theme park where men and dinosaurs existed at the same time? God bless America | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is more of a library than a single book. I think it tells us a lot about the views of the people that wrote it but it doesn’t mean that it’s all factual. It was re written that many times you are right what is fact . Like bk then there was many called Jesus it was a popular name . It’s all fictional for sure He plays for Arsenal with his mate Gabriel Jesus is still a popular name in some languages. Even used for girls as a second name. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think if there was no religion in the world we would quickly invent one. Think about your immune system. From before you are born it is working continuously to protect you. Get an infection and feel unwell, it reduces your appetite and raises your body temperature to maximise the effect of your immune system. It makes you tired, clingy towards your loved ones and reluctant to socialise. It knows for you to survive you need to strengthen the bonds with ones that will support you and distances you from those that won't. What better way of surviving than creating a super group with shared beliefs that would support you at time of need. The best way of cementing that bond is to demonise none members. " WTF ??? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it gives someone hope, is it religion really a bad thing. Most of my elderly relatives found religion later in life, it gave them comfort when they were dying. I was brought up a catholic, but take a very relaxed attitude towards religion, as I don't think it fits in with the current world. It's not that it doesn't fit in, it's more that people choose to take their own path with religion as less significant in their lives. Consumerism and individualism have risen above with the person being the most important thing. People make their own choice to suit them and make any belief system irrelevant or lesser to their thought or choice. " All the kids in faith schools do not make up their own minds they are indoctrinated, the CofE currently has a £3 million project designed to evangelise kids in schools and not just faith schools, wake up very few adults suddenly get religion because it makes no sense and they can’t be bullied, that’s why most people tell the Jehovah’s Witnesses to fuck off | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets" That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t " Maybe see what's going on in gaza right now. It's far from that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. Not believing is also a religion." Incorrect, it’s a normal state of being | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. Not believing is also a religion. No. It is not. Non believing is simply not giving a fuck about a bunch of badly written fiction that others believe to be the word of their favourite deity. You sund like an angry zealous Atheist who has plenty evidence God doesn't exist. If that's not religion then what is? Lol" You don’t require evidence for the nonexistance of something, just for its existence, this is termed burden of proof, ask any judge. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The Bible is comfort to many and why deprive them.of that comfort. It's a belief system for many and a coping system.. Global warming being one. Enough scare mongering going on. If a person can find peace in the sacred text then good luck to them " Mediums are comforting for people are they ok? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"1) Re-written 300 years after te fact by nobody who was there. 2) Less than 50% of UK population actively practice christianity so why is it still taught in schools? If most people believe it to be fiction why brainwash kids with what is essentially fake news? You can’t teach something that has no proof to support it, you can only indoctrinate by fear and lies People choose to send their children to a religious ethos school. They are taught, not brainwashed. Far more frivolous brainwashing going on daily through various mediums. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. Not believing is also a religion. Incorrect, it’s a normal state of being" To what extent is not believing normal, laws and rules that are not religious based are also written by people..? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it A basic tenet of science is that any aspect of it can be disproved if an alternative is found Is that true of any religion?" Why would anyone try to disprove something that has never been proven? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"belive none of it ... its a book used for power and control ... there a interesting docu on netflix i think it was about the links between the bible and ra the sun god from 2000 years before change a few words and both nearly the same ...its power make people fear then control then power .. The Vatican also harbours paedophiles with outstanding warrants for their arrest i dont have a problem in what people belive that there choice and fair play to them but to me its just another fantasy book .... What Foxy said. All religion is a form of social control based on irrational fear - and it’s a way for many to make shed loads of money too - the Vatican is a prime example of that. Governments love religion because it saves them a job. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith. That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it. I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you. I mean I admire your argument. But to think and say that all science is perfect and fact based is nonsense. It's been proven time and again that peer reviewed science papers that are funded by agendas are less than truthful. Fundamentally in its purist form I'd probably agree. But some aspects of "science" have been so corrupted by greedy scientists in the quest for ego or cash. And that's ignoring the fact that beliefs and culture are not welded to science at all. They touch the soul and emotions which thankfully have not been scientised yet. There's a reason why some people when on their death bed say send for the priest/imam/rabbi.its to provide comfort and belief that science on its own can't. Lastly. It really isn't a contest between fact and science and belief systems. They can happily Co exist and add value to our lives. So long as people stop trying to insult and attack others who dont share the same beliefs. " Science isn’t a belief it just is and is proven to be Religion is a dangerous control mechanism which does no good and harms millions | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it A basic tenet of science is that any aspect of it can be disproved if an alternative is found Is that true of any religion? Why would anyone try to disprove something that has never been proven?" Are you saying that science doesn't exist or that new ideas don't supercede older theories when new evidence comes to light? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it A basic tenet of science is that any aspect of it can be disproved if an alternative is found Is that true of any religion? Why would anyone try to disprove something that has never been proven? Are you saying that science doesn't exist or that new ideas don't supercede older theories when new evidence comes to light?" Isn't the world flat then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Someone once said this, and it's very true Remove all religious and scientific literature. ALL of thier teachings. In 500 years Science will not have changed, because they are indelible FACTS Religion will completely change, as its based on feelings, and ideas" Fact | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t Maybe see what's going on in gaza right now. It's far from that. " This makes no sense? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it A basic tenet of science is that any aspect of it can be disproved if an alternative is found Is that true of any religion? Why would anyone try to disprove something that has never been proven? Are you saying that science doesn't exist or that new ideas don't supercede older theories when new evidence comes to light?" God has never been proven to exist so there is no requirement to disprove it. The whole basis of science is proof | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it A basic tenet of science is that any aspect of it can be disproved if an alternative is found Is that true of any religion? Why would anyone try to disprove something that has never been proven? Are you saying that science doesn't exist or that new ideas don't supercede older theories when new evidence comes to light? God has never been proven to exist so there is no requirement to disprove it. The whole basis of science is proof" You're preaching to the converted | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith. That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it. I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you. I mean I admire your argument. But to think and say that all science is perfect and fact based is nonsense. It's been proven time and again that peer reviewed science papers that are funded by agendas are less than truthful. Fundamentally in its purist form I'd probably agree. But some aspects of "science" have been so corrupted by greedy scientists in the quest for ego or cash. And that's ignoring the fact that beliefs and culture are not welded to science at all. They touch the soul and emotions which thankfully have not been scientised yet. There's a reason why some people when on their death bed say send for the priest/imam/rabbi.its to provide comfort and belief that science on its own can't. Lastly. It really isn't a contest between fact and science and belief systems. They can happily Co exist and add value to our lives. So long as people stop trying to insult and attack others who dont share the same beliefs. " Anything people are involved with is open to abuse. I have no illusions about this. But this doesn't invalidate the science, it only proves that people are willing to manipulate data to suit their purposes. Remember there's lies, damned lies and statistics. I've already said that people find comfort in religion and that's fine, I don't begrudge anyone their faith. But you can use science to find that comfort too, science tells us about our place in the universe, what processes are involved in death and how our death is part of a natural cycle. It demystifies death which helps to dismiss the fear associated with it. I think there will always be tension between science and religion. They're basically both the same thing, a search for an understanding of reality and our place in it. The methods used though are diametrically opposed. This is where the tension lies and I can't see anyway of reconciling the two. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I always ask religious people what bit of the bible did God write ? You’ll be surprised how many don’t know the answer. " None of it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ignoring science and its differences in revealing truths from religion. I find how religion is interpreted is very problematic. If any god is omnipotent, all powerful, all knowing and created everything then surely any texts documenting the history of that particular religion, the main players and the rules to live your life as a believer should be free from interpretation of man. Now I know man 'wrote' the Bible and man is fallible but God is not, that's one of the thing that makes him God. So surely such texts are the word of the particular God for that particular religion. Although written by man, through the guidance of their God, it surely must not be open to interpretation or problems with translation, God being all knowing would be able to see this and ensure that their word is true. So followers of the same religion could be wrong in their beliefs, even though they follow the same text, believe in the same God. Moderates believe that there is some leeway in what the text actually states, what with it being man made and the problems of translation and the like. Zealots on the other hand believe every word was handed down by God and should be followed with no deviation from the text. Although being a non-believer I find the Zealot approach more understandable, even if I do not believe the approaches they take to follow their religious path. After all they all believe in the same God, but only the zealots believe that 'their' version of the same God is infallible, moderates appear to accept that God can make mistakes because by allowing man to write these texts God did not see what mistakes and problems with interpretations would arise. So if any God can make mistakes are they really a God? It wouldn't be any God I could believe in and follow. Even though I said I understood the Zealots approach to reading and following their texts doesn't mean that I believe in those texts. If you take any approach that says these texts are to be taken literally, they are the actual word of God's, then you run into problems within the text themselves. Looking at the Bible, in Isaiah 40.22 it states 'He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth...'. So we all know when viewed from space, 'above the earth', that the earth is a sphere. But the Bible does not say that, it says 'circle'. Now moderates would jump in here with a translation or interpretation argument but zealots cannot do that for this is the word of God. A circle is a very defined name for a two dimension object. It's not a ball or a sphere. A plate can be a circle and if you look at it from above that's how it appears. However if viewed from the side its flat. The same shape that the earth was thought to be when these texts were written. That may be why in Provebs they say the phrase 'edge of the earth...". Ultimately this is the problem I have with religious texts, no matter what approach you follow in reading these texts, or how you follow your life upon your interpretation of them, it seems that there's too much contradiction contained within them for me to believe. That's my interpretation. I think I may have a problem saying that in my last sentence haha, Mrs x" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith. That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it. I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you." A gigantic amount of what was considered scientific facts was proven wrong by other scientists. You're claiming we're gonna make the same scientific mistakes. Loads of assumptions there. As for evidence. The 8 billion people who are brainwashed to believe "science" never saw the evidence and even if they did, they're not qualified to interpret it. Evolution for example. A lot of missing links evidences were proven fraud. Most People today that our first ancestors were all black for example. As if it's a proven scientific fact. When there is zero evidence for it. They're just assuming that millions of years ago the Ethiopian people were black. Zero evidence and toons of assumptions. Fiction. The scientists have opposing conclusions about Covid19 depending on the country they belong to and its politics. As for religious books you're making affirmative conclusion that none of them will be written the same. Based on the assumption that they are false. That's a circular reasoning fallacy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t " So the many millions of Muslims who died in the past 33 years by western bombs and western made famines... The genocide in Gaza as we speak what is that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t Maybe see what's going on in gaza right now. It's far from that. This makes no sense?" So Muslims being rounded up and slaughtered and starved to death in a giant camp with no escape isn't a example of the west / Christians slaughtering Muslims? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t Maybe see what's going on in gaza right now. It's far from that. This makes no sense? So Muslims being rounded up and slaughtered and starved to death in a giant camp with no escape isn't a example of the west / Christians slaughtering Muslims? " Its certainly an example of why I'd follow any religion, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t Maybe see what's going on in gaza right now. It's far from that. This makes no sense? So Muslims being rounded up and slaughtered and starved to death in a giant camp with no escape isn't a example of the west / Christians slaughtering Muslims? " I'd argue that the killing of so many Muslims is an indication there is no Allah. If so many people of his religion are being murdered, why is there no intervention? But to use Islam as an example is disingenuous, historically Muslims have killed many of their fellow Muslims because of factional disputes. Where they are in the majority they persecute all other religions until they are driven out from any area that they control. The recent Gaza conflict would never have happened if Hamas hadn't murdered over a thousand innocent Jewish people. The subsequent death toll from the inevitable retaliation wouldn't have been so high if Hamas hadn't used the Gazan population as a human shield and hidden it's resources and personnel in civilian facilities such as hospitals and residential blocks. Islam seems to excel at making a rod for its own back. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So Muslims being rounded up and slaughtered and starved to death in a giant camp with no escape isn't a example of the west / Christians slaughtering Muslims? " Do you mean what some Jews are doing or what some Christians are doing? Gbat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t Maybe see what's going on in gaza right now. It's far from that. This makes no sense? So Muslims being rounded up and slaughtered and starved to death in a giant camp with no escape isn't a example of the west / Christians slaughtering Muslims? I'd argue that the killing of so many Muslims is an indication there is no Allah. If so many people of his religion are being murdered, why is there no intervention? But to use Islam as an example is disingenuous, historically Muslims have killed many of their fellow Muslims because of factional disputes. Where they are in the majority they persecute all other religions until they are driven out from any area that they control. The recent Gaza conflict would never have happened if Hamas hadn't murdered over a thousand innocent Jewish people. The subsequent death toll from the inevitable retaliation wouldn't have been so high if Hamas hadn't used the Gazan population as a human shield and hidden it's resources and personnel in civilian facilities such as hospitals and residential blocks. Islam seems to excel at making a rod for its own back." Oh yes, because Christians have NEVER killed other Christians because of factional disputes….. oh, apart from centuries of Protestants and Catholics of course… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd suggest you create time to visit the ark encounter in Kentucky. Is this similar to the religious theme park where men and dinosaurs existed at the same time? God bless America " They did exist together. There is a documentary with Raquel Welsh in it called 1,000,000 years BC. Strange they never show it any more. What are they trying to hide? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bible is utter nonsense, there is no god, the very concept of diety is absurd, as far as I'm concerned religious people are a bunch of deluded crackpots. You wouldn't say the say the same about Allah or the Koran. Bible and God are easy targets That’s because the Christians have stopped killing peoples (generally) but the Islamist’s haven’t So the many millions of Muslims who died in the past 33 years by western bombs and western made famines... The genocide in Gaza as we speak what is that? " It means you can slag off the Christian’s with impunity but slag off the Islamists at your peril | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are many religions that fools follow and one being science but if it makes you happy then why knock it I read this somewhere, I can't remember exactly where or by whom, but it goes like this. If all knowledge of religion and science were somehow erased from humanity, that we were starting again from scratch, we would not find ourselves rewriting the Bible, Koran or any religious literature as it was before. But, eventually, all our science books will be the same as they were because the understanding of our universe is based upon immutable laws which govern our existence. Science is not a religion. Science is based upon evidence but religion is based upon faith. That isn't to say religion doesn't serve an important function, it's the source of so much great art and beauty. It gives comfort to many people. It can offer a supportive community of people to those who need it. It's morals are, basically, good. It promotes good deeds, not harming others, and helping those in need where you can. It has a lot going for it. I have a rule when it comes to this kind of thing, if you don't try to talk me into it, I won't try to talk you out of it, meaning if you don't start proselytising at me, I'm not going to turn into an atheist arsehole at you. A gigantic amount of what was considered scientific facts was proven wrong by other scientists. You're claiming we're gonna make the same scientific mistakes. Loads of assumptions there. As for evidence. The 8 billion people who are brainwashed to believe "science" never saw the evidence and even if they did, they're not qualified to interpret it. Evolution for example. A lot of missing links evidences were proven fraud. Most People today that our first ancestors were all black for example. As if it's a proven scientific fact. When there is zero evidence for it. They're just assuming that millions of years ago the Ethiopian people were black. Zero evidence and toons of assumptions. Fiction. The scientists have opposing conclusions about Covid19 depending on the country they belong to and its politics. As for religious books you're making affirmative conclusion that none of them will be written the same. Based on the assumption that they are false. That's a circular reasoning fallacy. " Every post you put up just proves how impossible it is to have any kind of discussion with a bigot | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd suggest you create time to visit the ark encounter in Kentucky. Is this similar to the religious theme park where men and dinosaurs existed at the same time? God bless America They did exist together. There is a documentary with Raquel Welsh in it called 1,000,000 years BC. Strange they never show it any more. What are they trying to hide?" Shit I forgot about that, there goes my credibility then, thanks a lot | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So Muslims being rounded up and slaughtered and starved to death in a giant camp with no escape isn't a example of the west / Christians slaughtering Muslims? Do you mean what some Jews are doing or what some Christians are doing? Gbat " Both in as much as Israel being the 51st state and where they purchase and fund their war machine from. Israel would not be doing this without strong backing to keep their foot on the throat of the Muslim countries around them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thought this thread was a generic one about belief in the bible and what it says ...." None of my threads are generic, thanks. Gbat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thought this thread was a generic one about belief in the bible and what it says .... None of my threads are generic, thanks. Gbat " What part of Leviticus was your sister quoting? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality." There's some sense | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality." I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harm | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harm" Spirituality is at the core of every religion. They can't be separated. From climate change to the crusades, humans will seize power for profit wherever they can. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harm" Its not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion. It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harm Spirituality is at the core of every religion. They can't be separated. From climate change to the crusades, humans will seize power for profit wherever they can. " Spiritualism is not the core of religion, ignorance, power and wealth is, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion. It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x" Zealotry is always a problem. These kinds of people also exist outside religion. Politics and Economics are no different and exert much more direct influence on today's world. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion. It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x Zealotry is always a problem. These kinds of people also exist outside religion. Politics and Economics are no different and exert much more direct influence on today's world." I agree whole heartedly, politics and economics are almost modern religions, behaving as such x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Spiritualism is not the core of religion, ignorance, power and wealth is, Mrs x" This is factually incorrect. People are ignorant and seize power and wealth. Those people may take control of religious organisations but that doesn't change the core tenet of religion. Every major religion started with a prophet and a message. Those messages haven't changed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion. It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x" There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God" and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death" Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Spiritualism is not the core of religion, ignorance, power and wealth is, Mrs x This is factually incorrect. People are ignorant and seize power and wealth. Those people may take control of religious organisations but that doesn't change the core tenet of religion. Every major religion started with a prophet and a message. Those messages haven't changed. " When I say ignorance I don't mean of individuals, I mean religions operate on ignorance of the rules. Only the priesthood can talk to their God. They enforce compliance through ignorance of the consequences of the after life. Also they make it very difficult to learn more, mass was conducted in Latin, a dead language for hundreds of years. That's the ignorance I talk of. It's the same as your uncle holding that box in front of you and daring you as a small child to put your hand in it. You are not scared of putting your hand in an empty box but you are scared of what you don't know is in the box. That ignorance, the fear of the unknown is what all religions use to control their flock. That's how religions could exert control over kings and warlords, throughout history. The fear that the ecclesiastical elite may be right. The ignorance of not knowing has been used as a powerful tool from the beginning of time. Every prophet that you say started religions all professed to talk to their deity. Do you think they did that for a spirtulistic reason, or did the tell a story to gain control. Saying you know something that someone else doesn't and saying it will control all aspects of their life if they don't listen is a really compelling way to get someone to listen to you. Ancient Greek sophists even stated that God's were the inventions of the ruling elite to keep the masses in the field. How else could you control a population that could easily overthrow you. Eternal damnation was quite persuasive. So it's ignorance of the unknown and control of that ignorance by a few that's at the heart of all religion Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion. It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God" and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death" Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. " I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Spiritualism is not the core of religion, ignorance, power and wealth is, Mrs x This is factually incorrect. People are ignorant and seize power and wealth. Those people may take control of religious organisations but that doesn't change the core tenet of religion. Every major religion started with a prophet and a message. Those messages haven't changed. When I say ignorance I don't mean of individuals, I mean religions operate on ignorance of the rules. Only the priesthood can talk to their God. They enforce compliance through ignorance of the consequences of the after life. Also they make it very difficult to learn more, mass was conducted in Latin, a dead language for hundreds of years. That's the ignorance I talk of. It's the same as your uncle holding that box in front of you and daring you as a small child to put your hand in it. You are not scared of putting your hand in an empty box but you are scared of what you don't know is in the box. That ignorance, the fear of the unknown is what all religions use to control their flock. That's how religions could exert control over kings and warlords, throughout history. The fear that the ecclesiastical elite may be right. The ignorance of not knowing has been used as a powerful tool from the beginning of time. Every prophet that you say started religions all professed to talk to their deity. Do you think they did that for a spirtulistic reason, or did the tell a story to gain control. Saying you know something that someone else doesn't and saying it will control all aspects of their life if they don't listen is a really compelling way to get someone to listen to you. Ancient Greek sophists even stated that God's were the inventions of the ruling elite to keep the masses in the field. How else could you control a population that could easily overthrow you. Eternal damnation was quite persuasive. So it's ignorance of the unknown and control of that ignorance by a few that's at the heart of all religion Mrs x" Do you realise that "Religions" and "Christianity" are not synonyms? You judge other religions from the mistakes and atrocities committed in the name of Christianity. And generalise from there. The west's history and experience is not the worlds history and experience. May be you should widen your horizon a bit read about other civilisations and travel more. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is like a Contest to show how little people know about religion. Yet proselytise about nuance of religion as if a well educated and informed theologian. I am the first to admit I know very little and don't wish to try to encapsulate people's religions into a couple of catchy sound bites for effect.its good to debate different corners though. " If you admit to know very little how can you claim to know that others very little about religion? Just asking. I'm not saying you are wrong it's just seems a little contradictory, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Spiritualism is not the core of religion, ignorance, power and wealth is, Mrs x This is factually incorrect. People are ignorant and seize power and wealth. Those people may take control of religious organisations but that doesn't change the core tenet of religion. Every major religion started with a prophet and a message. Those messages haven't changed. When I say ignorance I don't mean of individuals, I mean religions operate on ignorance of the rules. Only the priesthood can talk to their God. They enforce compliance through ignorance of the consequences of the after life. Also they make it very difficult to learn more, mass was conducted in Latin, a dead language for hundreds of years. That's the ignorance I talk of. It's the same as your uncle holding that box in front of you and daring you as a small child to put your hand in it. You are not scared of putting your hand in an empty box but you are scared of what you don't know is in the box. That ignorance, the fear of the unknown is what all religions use to control their flock. That's how religions could exert control over kings and warlords, throughout history. The fear that the ecclesiastical elite may be right. The ignorance of not knowing has been used as a powerful tool from the beginning of time. Every prophet that you say started religions all professed to talk to their deity. Do you think they did that for a spirtulistic reason, or did the tell a story to gain control. Saying you know something that someone else doesn't and saying it will control all aspects of their life if they don't listen is a really compelling way to get someone to listen to you. Ancient Greek sophists even stated that God's were the inventions of the ruling elite to keep the masses in the field. How else could you control a population that could easily overthrow you. Eternal damnation was quite persuasive. So it's ignorance of the unknown and control of that ignorance by a few that's at the heart of all religion Mrs x Do you realise that "Religions" and "Christianity" are not synonyms? You judge other religions from the mistakes and atrocities committed in the name of Christianity. And generalise from there. The west's history and experience is not the worlds history and experience. May be you should widen your horizon a bit read about other civilisations and travel more. " You haven't read my posts then. I have not quoted Christianity as the religion I am talking about. I say things like religious texts etc. I am talking about ALL religions. Do you know that certain factors commit terrible things against members of the same faith. Sunni' and Shia Muslims spring to mind in the Middle East. Hindi and Muslims in Indian subcontinent. Catholics and Protestants in Ireland. These all off the top of my head, involving three very different religions. Going back further Alexander conquered the Middle East, at that time the greatest empire the world had ever seen. All the while whilst proclaiming himself a God. Is that historically or well travelled enough for you? Please read what I say before you become condescending and insulting, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion. It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God" and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death" Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x" No. That's a western mindset. Even now. We dictate our so called "Higher moral values" and try to shove it down the throats of the rest of the world by force, invasions, mass murder, economic embargoes and man made famines, interfering in the internal affairs of every country in the world, imposing our culture on them, toppling elected leaders or assassinating them, coup d'etats ect. The west has been like this since the Roman legacy. Genocide after genocide throughout history. If it's not under the name of Christianity, it's done under the name of "Civilising the savages", or "Democraticising the undemocratic" or "Spreading our human rights, women's rights, Childrens rights, religious freedom rights, freedon of speach ... Superior values" whil Other religions cohabited and lived in a relative harmony by far compared to the west. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Spiritualism is not the core of religion, ignorance, power and wealth is, Mrs x This is factually incorrect. People are ignorant and seize power and wealth. Those people may take control of religious organisations but that doesn't change the core tenet of religion. Every major religion started with a prophet and a message. Those messages haven't changed. When I say ignorance I don't mean of individuals, I mean religions operate on ignorance of the rules. Only the priesthood can talk to their God. They enforce compliance through ignorance of the consequences of the after life. Also they make it very difficult to learn more, mass was conducted in Latin, a dead language for hundreds of years. That's the ignorance I talk of. It's the same as your uncle holding that box in front of you and daring you as a small child to put your hand in it. You are not scared of putting your hand in an empty box but you are scared of what you don't know is in the box. That ignorance, the fear of the unknown is what all religions use to control their flock. That's how religions could exert control over kings and warlords, throughout history. The fear that the ecclesiastical elite may be right. The ignorance of not knowing has been used as a powerful tool from the beginning of time. Every prophet that you say started religions all professed to talk to their deity. Do you think they did that for a spirtulistic reason, or did the tell a story to gain control. Saying you know something that someone else doesn't and saying it will control all aspects of their life if they don't listen is a really compelling way to get someone to listen to you. Ancient Greek sophists even stated that God's were the inventions of the ruling elite to keep the masses in the field. How else could you control a population that could easily overthrow you. Eternal damnation was quite persuasive. So it's ignorance of the unknown and control of that ignorance by a few that's at the heart of all religion Mrs x Do you realise that "Religions" and "Christianity" are not synonyms? You judge other religions from the mistakes and atrocities committed in the name of Christianity. And generalise from there. The west's history and experience is not the worlds history and experience. May be you should widen your horizon a bit read about other civilisations and travel more. You haven't read my posts then. I have not quoted Christianity as the religion I am talking about. I say things like religious texts etc. I am talking about ALL religions. Do you know that certain factors commit terrible things against members of the same faith. Sunni' and Shia Muslims spring to mind in the Middle East. Hindi and Muslims in Indian subcontinent. Catholics and Protestants in Ireland. These all off the top of my head, involving three very different religions. Going back further Alexander conquered the Middle East, at that time the greatest empire the world had ever seen. All the while whilst proclaiming himself a God. Is that historically or well travelled enough for you? Please read what I say before you become condescending and insulting, Mrs x" You're talking about "All religions" based on your western traumatic experience with Christianity. It's no different from a women who has just been out an abusive relationship, then generalise "All men are the same". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The bit that annoyed me was when my sister quoted Leviticus (which is basically a list of rules, not a story). ... " I seem to recall that Peter Cook and Dudley Moore thought that Leviticus was a person! A specific type of person, allegedly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion. It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God" and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death" Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x No. That's a western mindset. Even now. We dictate our so called "Higher moral values" and try to shove it down the throats of the rest of the world by force, invasions, mass murder, economic embargoes and man made famines, interfering in the internal affairs of every country in the world, imposing our culture on them, toppling elected leaders or assassinating them, coup d'etats ect. The west has been like this since the Roman legacy. Genocide after genocide throughout history. If it's not under the name of Christianity, it's done under the name of "Civilising the savages", or "Democraticising the undemocratic" or "Spreading our human rights, women's rights, Childrens rights, religious freedom rights, freedon of speach ... Superior values" whil Other religions cohabited and lived in a relative harmony by far compared to the west. " Its been going on since the dawn of time. From the cradle of civilisation. Summarian, Hittite and Egyptian empires all fought each other, all inspiring their armies that their Gods were on their side. Exodus tells of the story of the attempts by Rameses 2nd to eradicate the Jews as they fled from Israel. Persians, a middle Eastern empire, fought there way west, subjugation everyone in there way. Genesis Khan is alleged to have beheaded over a million people in a day! The Mongols were a Far East people that invaded as far hungry in Europe. Gengis was said to be honoured by his God's by being born with a blood clot in his hand. So it's not a Western thing, it's a human thing. And it's been going on for a long time. Some of the things I have quoted are over 5,000 years old, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is like a Contest to show how little people know about religion. Yet proselytise about nuance of religion as if a well educated and informed theologian. I am the first to admit I know very little and don't wish to try to encapsulate people's religions into a couple of catchy sound bites for effect.its good to debate different corners though. If you admit to know very little how can you claim to know that others very little about religion? Just asking. I'm not saying you are wrong it's just seems a little contradictory, Mrs x" Because some of the statements put in here as fact are very obviously wrong. One such being stating all to be about a God. There are thousands of religions. Not all of them have gods. Nontheistic ones. Taoism, confucionism, Buddhism. Greek roman and Egyptian gods... There are some who are clearly very anti and that's fine and their right. But what irritates is the anti brigade don't seem to be terribly knowledgeable about what it is they are anti about. It's like... I've read the headlines in the sun for 5 years and have come to the conclusion that I know enough about all religions, all cultures and all history to say that all religions are bad and are for idiots. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ... It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God" and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death" Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x ... " Some religions have more than one god. I have a poster here portraying two gods of opposite sex sharing a swing. I think it is fabulous. Happy to give it display space, even though I am not religious. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion. It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God" and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death" Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x No. That's a western mindset. Even now. We dictate our so called "Higher moral values" and try to shove it down the throats of the rest of the world by force, invasions, mass murder, economic embargoes and man made famines, interfering in the internal affairs of every country in the world, imposing our culture on them, toppling elected leaders or assassinating them, coup d'etats ect. The west has been like this since the Roman legacy. Genocide after genocide throughout history. If it's not under the name of Christianity, it's done under the name of "Civilising the savages", or "Democraticising the undemocratic" or "Spreading our human rights, women's rights, Childrens rights, religious freedom rights, freedon of speach ... Superior values" whil Other religions cohabited and lived in a relative harmony by far compared to the west. Its been going on since the dawn of time. From the cradle of civilisation. Summarian, Hittite and Egyptian empires all fought each other, all inspiring their armies that their Gods were on their side. Exodus tells of the story of the attempts by Rameses 2nd to eradicate the Jews as they fled from Israel. Persians, a middle Eastern empire, fought there way west, subjugation everyone in there way. Genesis Khan is alleged to have beheaded over a million people in a day! The Mongols were a Far East people that invaded as far hungry in Europe. Gengis was said to be honoured by his God's by being born with a blood clot in his hand. So it's not a Western thing, it's a human thing. And it's been going on for a long time. Some of the things I have quoted are over 5,000 years old, Mrs x" You can find Tyrants and examples of genocides or extermination attempts in the east. Sure. But you can also find examples of Religious and cultural tolerance in other civilisations. The Persians weren't forcefully converting their new subjects. Yes they aimed at expanding their territory and power just like any other empire, but they saved the Jews from the Babylonians, they tolerated Christianity. Under Islamic civilisation, all the Christian sects survived, sects that were persecuted under the Roman Catholic empire. The Jews thrived and experienced their Golden age of literature and enovation under Islamic rule. You can't say that about the west. "Our way or death" Even post Christianity. Genghis Khan was a blood thirsty power hungry man but he was tolerant to other faiths and many if his grand sons converted to Islam after invading India, and the Middle east. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is like a Contest to show how little people know about religion. Yet proselytise about nuance of religion as if a well educated and informed theologian. I am the first to admit I know very little and don't wish to try to encapsulate people's religions into a couple of catchy sound bites for effect.its good to debate different corners though. If you admit to know very little how can you claim to know that others very little about religion? Just asking. I'm not saying you are wrong it's just seems a little contradictory, Mrs x Because some of the statements put in here as fact are very obviously wrong. One such being stating all to be about a God. There are thousands of religions. Not all of them have gods. Nontheistic ones. Taoism, confucionism, Buddhism. Greek roman and Egyptian gods... There are some who are clearly very anti and that's fine and their right. But what irritates is the anti brigade don't seem to be terribly knowledgeable about what it is they are anti about. It's like... I've read the headlines in the sun for 5 years and have come to the conclusion that I know enough about all religions, all cultures and all history to say that all religions are bad and are for idiots. " I only mentioned God's because the OP mentioned the bible, which is obviously the word of a God. I am not aware of the existence of nontheistic religions but I thought that Ancient Greek, Romans and Egyptians had a pantheon of gods. I am also aware that Buddha was not a God and that Buddhisms followers aim is to achieve enlightenment an obtain Buddha for themselves. But I did think there were God's associated with Buddism. I must confess that I didn't know Taoism was a Godless religion because I don't know much about that belief system. Does that mean Confucism is a similar religion? When I talk about God's I meant those that form the main religion and are worshipped by the majority of the worlds population, Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is like a Contest to show how little people know about religion. Yet proselytise about nuance of religion as if a well educated and informed theologian. I am the first to admit I know very little and don't wish to try to encapsulate people's religions into a couple of catchy sound bites for effect.its good to debate different corners though. If you admit to know very little how can you claim to know that others very little about religion? Just asking. I'm not saying you are wrong it's just seems a little contradictory, Mrs x Because some of the statements put in here as fact are very obviously wrong. One such being stating all to be about a God. There are thousands of religions. Not all of them have gods. Nontheistic ones. Taoism, confucionism, Buddhism. Greek roman and Egyptian gods... There are some who are clearly very anti and that's fine and their right. But what irritates is the anti brigade don't seem to be terribly knowledgeable about what it is they are anti about. It's like... I've read the headlines in the sun for 5 years and have come to the conclusion that I know enough about all religions, all cultures and all history to say that all religions are bad and are for idiots. I only mentioned God's because the OP mentioned the bible, which is obviously the word of a God. I am not aware of the existence of nontheistic religions but I thought that Ancient Greek, Romans and Egyptians had a pantheon of gods. I am also aware that Buddha was not a God and that Buddhisms followers aim is to achieve enlightenment an obtain Buddha for themselves. But I did think there were God's associated with Buddism. I must confess that I didn't know Taoism was a Godless religion because I don't know much about that belief system. Does that mean Confucism is a similar religion? When I talk about God's I meant those that form the main religion and are worshipped by the majority of the worlds population, Mrs x" That's the limit of my knowledge I'm afraid.. And yes I didn't write very well about the Romans and Greeks and Egyptians who most definitely had many gods... I was simply trying to illustrate that monotheistic religions are a percentage of religions and others are available thta have no god head or many god heads. That's as far as o level re got me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion. It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God" and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death" Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x No. That's a western mindset. Even now. We dictate our so called "Higher moral values" and try to shove it down the throats of the rest of the world by force, invasions, mass murder, economic embargoes and man made famines, interfering in the internal affairs of every country in the world, imposing our culture on them, toppling elected leaders or assassinating them, coup d'etats ect. The west has been like this since the Roman legacy. Genocide after genocide throughout history. If it's not under the name of Christianity, it's done under the name of "Civilising the savages", or "Democraticising the undemocratic" or "Spreading our human rights, women's rights, Childrens rights, religious freedom rights, freedon of speach ... Superior values" whil Other religions cohabited and lived in a relative harmony by far compared to the west. Its been going on since the dawn of time. From the cradle of civilisation. Summarian, Hittite and Egyptian empires all fought each other, all inspiring their armies that their Gods were on their side. Exodus tells of the story of the attempts by Rameses 2nd to eradicate the Jews as they fled from Israel. Persians, a middle Eastern empire, fought there way west, subjugation everyone in there way. Genesis Khan is alleged to have beheaded over a million people in a day! The Mongols were a Far East people that invaded as far hungry in Europe. Gengis was said to be honoured by his God's by being born with a blood clot in his hand. So it's not a Western thing, it's a human thing. And it's been going on for a long time. Some of the things I have quoted are over 5,000 years old, Mrs x You can find Tyrants and examples of genocides or extermination attempts in the east. Sure. But you can also find examples of Religious and cultural tolerance in other civilisations. The Persians weren't forcefully converting their new subjects. Yes they aimed at expanding their territory and power just like any other empire, but they saved the Jews from the Babylonians, they tolerated Christianity. Under Islamic civilisation, all the Christian sects survived, sects that were persecuted under the Roman Catholic empire. The Jews thrived and experienced their Golden age of literature and enovation under Islamic rule. You can't say that about the west. "Our way or death" Even post Christianity. Genghis Khan was a blood thirsty power hungry man but he was tolerant to other faiths and many if his grand sons converted to Islam after invading India, and the Middle east. " I'm not saying religion is bad or not had a positive effect at times. What I am saying is that religion can be used for evil. That's why I talk about Moderates and Zealots, it's Zealots of any religion that are the problem. I am aware of religious tolerance, after the fact, in the empires you talk of but that only occurred post atrocities. There were no peaceful take overs. Your view of the west seems a little eschewed. I cannot recall vast amounts of the west acting as you suggest. Don't remember Scandinavia acting in such a way, well after the Vikings that is. Are you talking about Ireland, that's on the westernmost boundaries of Europe. Is it Brazil, Venezuela, Peru or any of the South American countries. Maybe you are talking about west African countries? Somehow I think you mean USA in the main. It does come across as anti American and I do not think USA is a religion. Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is like a Contest to show how little people know about religion. Yet proselytise about nuance of religion as if a well educated and informed theologian. I am the first to admit I know very little and don't wish to try to encapsulate people's religions into a couple of catchy sound bites for effect.its good to debate different corners though. If you admit to know very little how can you claim to know that others very little about religion? Just asking. I'm not saying you are wrong it's just seems a little contradictory, Mrs x Because some of the statements put in here as fact are very obviously wrong. One such being stating all to be about a God. There are thousands of religions. Not all of them have gods. Nontheistic ones. Taoism, confucionism, Buddhism. Greek roman and Egyptian gods... There are some who are clearly very anti and that's fine and their right. But what irritates is the anti brigade don't seem to be terribly knowledgeable about what it is they are anti about. It's like... I've read the headlines in the sun for 5 years and have come to the conclusion that I know enough about all religions, all cultures and all history to say that all religions are bad and are for idiots. I only mentioned God's because the OP mentioned the bible, which is obviously the word of a God. I am not aware of the existence of nontheistic religions but I thought that Ancient Greek, Romans and Egyptians had a pantheon of gods. I am also aware that Buddha was not a God and that Buddhisms followers aim is to achieve enlightenment an obtain Buddha for themselves. But I did think there were God's associated with Buddism. I must confess that I didn't know Taoism was a Godless religion because I don't know much about that belief system. Does that mean Confucism is a similar religion? When I talk about God's I meant those that form the main religion and are worshipped by the majority of the worlds population, Mrs x That's the limit of my knowledge I'm afraid.. And yes I didn't write very well about the Romans and Greeks and Egyptians who most definitely had many gods... I was simply trying to illustrate that monotheistic religions are a percentage of religions and others are available thta have no god head or many god heads. That's as far as o level re got me. " I believe my points are true of polytheism as well. Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What part of Leviticus was your sister quoting? Mrs " It was along the lines of "If a man lays with another man as if she was a woman, he should be put to death." Basically saying being gay was against the bible. (Only men though, no mention of gay women). But Leviticus also says that you shouldn't cut the sides of your hair. I was wondering why one rule is seen as important, but not the other. Gbat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion. It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God" and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death" Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x No. That's a western mindset. Even now. We dictate our so called "Higher moral values" and try to shove it down the throats of the rest of the world by force, invasions, mass murder, economic embargoes and man made famines, interfering in the internal affairs of every country in the world, imposing our culture on them, toppling elected leaders or assassinating them, coup d'etats ect. The west has been like this since the Roman legacy. Genocide after genocide throughout history. If it's not under the name of Christianity, it's done under the name of "Civilising the savages", or "Democraticising the undemocratic" or "Spreading our human rights, women's rights, Childrens rights, religious freedom rights, freedon of speach ... Superior values" whil Other religions cohabited and lived in a relative harmony by far compared to the west. Its been going on since the dawn of time. From the cradle of civilisation. Summarian, Hittite and Egyptian empires all fought each other, all inspiring their armies that their Gods were on their side. Exodus tells of the story of the attempts by Rameses 2nd to eradicate the Jews as they fled from Israel. Persians, a middle Eastern empire, fought there way west, subjugation everyone in there way. Genesis Khan is alleged to have beheaded over a million people in a day! The Mongols were a Far East people that invaded as far hungry in Europe. Gengis was said to be honoured by his God's by being born with a blood clot in his hand. So it's not a Western thing, it's a human thing. And it's been going on for a long time. Some of the things I have quoted are over 5,000 years old, Mrs x You can find Tyrants and examples of genocides or extermination attempts in the east. Sure. But you can also find examples of Religious and cultural tolerance in other civilisations. The Persians weren't forcefully converting their new subjects. Yes they aimed at expanding their territory and power just like any other empire, but they saved the Jews from the Babylonians, they tolerated Christianity. Under Islamic civilisation, all the Christian sects survived, sects that were persecuted under the Roman Catholic empire. The Jews thrived and experienced their Golden age of literature and enovation under Islamic rule. You can't say that about the west. "Our way or death" Even post Christianity. Genghis Khan was a blood thirsty power hungry man but he was tolerant to other faiths and many if his grand sons converted to Islam after invading India, and the Middle east. I'm not saying religion is bad or not had a positive effect at times. What I am saying is that religion can be used for evil. That's why I talk about Moderates and Zealots, it's Zealots of any religion that are the problem. I am aware of religious tolerance, after the fact, in the empires you talk of but that only occurred post atrocities. There were no peaceful take overs. Your view of the west seems a little eschewed. I cannot recall vast amounts of the west acting as you suggest. Don't remember Scandinavia acting in such a way, well after the Vikings that is. Are you talking about Ireland, that's on the westernmost boundaries of Europe. Is it Brazil, Venezuela, Peru or any of the South American countries. Maybe you are talking about west African countries? Somehow I think you mean USA in the main. It does come across as anti American and I do not think USA is a religion. Mrs x" The Islamic expansion didn't target civilians, or Monks, or Churches or Synagogues. It was army vs army fights. They didn't forcefully convert people. They even let Christians and Jews have their own legal courts ruling with their own Christian or Jewish "Sharia law" and they certainly didn't demonise their "Sharia laws". Some Jews and Christians became even Prime ministers at different times. The USA isn't the west on its own. It just dominates it and take the lead. And religion is not just about Believing in a holy book revealed by an unseen God. Religions comes in form Ideologies that groups people into the mindset of a collective "Us vs them" "Our way of life vs Their way if life" "Our values vs Their vs values" It comes under different names and different convictions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion. It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x There is a big difference between believing "Our God is the Only One True God" and believing "People of other faiths don't have the right to exist". Historically speaking the latter is part of western culture. "Our way or Death" Other cultures and Religions have been more tolerant. I think that most religions have texts that are totally intolerant of other religious views. These are then used to attack others. This has happened throughout history and not just in the west, Mrs x No. That's a western mindset. Even now. We dictate our so called "Higher moral values" and try to shove it down the throats of the rest of the world by force, invasions, mass murder, economic embargoes and man made famines, interfering in the internal affairs of every country in the world, imposing our culture on them, toppling elected leaders or assassinating them, coup d'etats ect. The west has been like this since the Roman legacy. Genocide after genocide throughout history. If it's not under the name of Christianity, it's done under the name of "Civilising the savages", or "Democraticising the undemocratic" or "Spreading our human rights, women's rights, Childrens rights, religious freedom rights, freedon of speach ... Superior values" whil Other religions cohabited and lived in a relative harmony by far compared to the west. Its been going on since the dawn of time. From the cradle of civilisation. Summarian, Hittite and Egyptian empires all fought each other, all inspiring their armies that their Gods were on their side. Exodus tells of the story of the attempts by Rameses 2nd to eradicate the Jews as they fled from Israel. Persians, a middle Eastern empire, fought there way west, subjugation everyone in there way. Genesis Khan is alleged to have beheaded over a million people in a day! The Mongols were a Far East people that invaded as far hungry in Europe. Gengis was said to be honoured by his God's by being born with a blood clot in his hand. So it's not a Western thing, it's a human thing. And it's been going on for a long time. Some of the things I have quoted are over 5,000 years old, Mrs x You can find Tyrants and examples of genocides or extermination attempts in the east. Sure. But you can also find examples of Religious and cultural tolerance in other civilisations. The Persians weren't forcefully converting their new subjects. Yes they aimed at expanding their territory and power just like any other empire, but they saved the Jews from the Babylonians, they tolerated Christianity. Under Islamic civilisation, all the Christian sects survived, sects that were persecuted under the Roman Catholic empire. The Jews thrived and experienced their Golden age of literature and enovation under Islamic rule. You can't say that about the west. "Our way or death" Even post Christianity. Genghis Khan was a blood thirsty power hungry man but he was tolerant to other faiths and many if his grand sons converted to Islam after invading India, and the Middle east. I'm not saying religion is bad or not had a positive effect at times. What I am saying is that religion can be used for evil. That's why I talk about Moderates and Zealots, it's Zealots of any religion that are the problem. I am aware of religious tolerance, after the fact, in the empires you talk of but that only occurred post atrocities. There were no peaceful take overs. Your view of the west seems a little eschewed. I cannot recall vast amounts of the west acting as you suggest. Don't remember Scandinavia acting in such a way, well after the Vikings that is. Are you talking about Ireland, that's on the westernmost boundaries of Europe. Is it Brazil, Venezuela, Peru or any of the South American countries. Maybe you are talking about west African countries? Somehow I think you mean USA in the main. It does come across as anti American and I do not think USA is a religion. Mrs x The Islamic expansion didn't target civilians, or Monks, or Churches or Synagogues. It was army vs army fights. They didn't forcefully convert people. They even let Christians and Jews have their own legal courts ruling with their own Christian or Jewish "Sharia law" and they certainly didn't demonise their "Sharia laws". Some Jews and Christians became even Prime ministers at different times. The USA isn't the west on its own. It just dominates it and take the lead. And religion is not just about Believing in a holy book revealed by an unseen God. Religions comes in form Ideologies that groups people into the mindset of a collective "Us vs them" "Our way of life vs Their way if life" "Our values vs Their vs values" It comes under different names and different convictions. " You are confusing ideology and religion. Islam is a religion, communism is an ideology. And you do realise that places of worship of all faiths are found in the West. Over 3000 Synagogues and over 2500 mosques in the USA. In Iran there are only over 200 Synagogue s and 600 Churches. These figures should be four fold to reflect the difference in population of the two countries. But these figures do not seem to substantiate you claims of the West being more intolerant than the East. Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My mind is blown that's there's actually people in here arguing against science. Further blown that people think that science and religion can't coexist. Neither science nor religion has a mind if it's own. Both can and used help the world enormously just as both are used to damage your world enormously. People do good and bad. Neither is an all or nothing proposition. Nobody here is going to disprove the scientific method or the benifits of spirituality. I don’t think the issue is spirituality just organised religion which has and still is doing lots of harmIts not religion per se that's the issue, the problem lies with zealots of any religion. It's the mantra of our God is the only God that's the problem. Belief that only one group of people, the chosen, should exist. Mrs x Zealotry is always a problem. These kinds of people also exist outside religion. Politics and Economics are no different and exert much more direct influence on today's world." Yes but these guys don’t fuck your kids | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |