"This implies a dialogue is already happening, and that both parties have a stake in said dialogue.
Yes?"
I preferred your 1st post 
And yes... Unless, you're going into it with the preset mind of seeking a compromise?... My neighbours are twunts, we have a long running issue that's causing problems to my house. The compromise is they stop being aforementioned twunts... The reality is, we have yet to actually discuss the issue. The current 'compromise', is I'm just sucking up their shit decisions atm  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Don't know what OP's original post was, but if it involves the neighbors..
OP, forget about it...just effin' ' lock & load'!!
..effin' bloody neighbors!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"This implies a dialogue is already happening, and that both parties have a stake in said dialogue.
Yes?"
Yes. A compromise follows the first steps of a discussion and finding out what each party wants from it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"This implies a dialogue is already happening, and that both parties have a stake in said dialogue.
Yes?
I preferred your 1st post
And yes... Unless, you're going into it with the preset mind of seeking a compromise?... My neighbours are twunts, we have a long running issue that's causing problems to my house. The compromise is they stop being aforementioned twunts... The reality is, we have yet to actually discuss the issue. The current 'compromise', is I'm just sucking up their shit decisions atm "
There was a formatting issue.
I have neighbours like these. We did discuss the issue. They insist on being tw… cunts. Mine are cunts. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"This implies a dialogue is already happening, and that both parties have a stake in said dialogue.
Yes?
Yes. A compromise follows the first steps of a discussion and finding out what each party wants from it. "
There was no initial dialogue. Just the assumption that I’d “compromise.”
Maybe. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"This implies a dialogue is already happening, and that both parties have a stake in said dialogue.
Yes?
Yes. A compromise follows the first steps of a discussion and finding out what each party wants from it.
There was no initial dialogue. Just the assumption that I’d “compromise.”
Maybe."
That is definitely not a compromise. Unless you consider a one-sided compromise as such. I don’t  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
