FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Self-Driving Cars
Self-Driving Cars
Jump to: Newest in thread
I doubt many on here follow Tesla, electric cars and the technology that goes in to them, so some people may not know that in the last 24 hours the news is that Tesla’s ‘Full Self-Driving’ (FSD) Version 12 is about to be released to employees, a step taken before wide release to purchasers of the software.
Musk has had Tesla FSD cars driving around North America for the last 3+ years on versions coded by software engineers, so what’s the significance of FSD Version 12 I hear you ask?
V12 unlike its predecessors, hasn’t got a line of Software-engineered code controlling the car, instead the car has written its own code using ‘Neural Nets’, ‘Inference’ and being shown videos of ‘good drivers’ driving.
Musk demonstrated an early version of V12 on the streets of Paulo Alto, California in September to some acclaim from watchers of the live stream and the word is, that the since much-improved Version 12 is mind blowing and ‘better than human drivers’.
I for one can’t wait for my car to pick me up from a night out, to drop Cherry and me off before going back home to charge and collect us at the end of the day. Maybe even be used as a driverless taxi, if I choose. But I know I’m necessarily in the majority.
So what about you? Will you get your car to drop you off at meets and pick you up? Would you get in a driverless ‘Robotaxi’? If you had FSD, would you have it go off and earn you money as a taxi?
Hades |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I can imagine we aren't far off it managing very quiet big roads in countries where there is wide expanse of land and not many towns (ie more simple to navigate hazards etc)
But managing a very busy country like the UK just still seems far fetched to me!
It's all a bit too skynet for me!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Have they improved the software so it can detect hazards? "
It appears so yes. The demo from Musk in September showed it navigating Road Works effortlessly. It appears that rather than the problem being detection, it was the decision making of the car on how to navigate.
It also appears that without it ever being told what a stop sign is, that’s through watching videos of people stopping at stop signs, that’s V12 has learnt to stop at them. It’s that methodology which has led to the car learning to drive in all situations.
Tesla have invested large amounts of money on compute (to process the videos) and train the car’s computer. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Have they improved the software so it can detect hazards?
It appears so yes. The demo from Musk in September showed it navigating Road Works effortlessly. It appears that rather than the problem being detection, it was the decision making of the car on how to navigate.
It also appears that without it ever being told what a stop sign is, that’s through watching videos of people stopping at stop signs, that’s V12 has learnt to stop at them. It’s that methodology which has led to the car learning to drive in all situations.
Tesla have invested large amounts of money on compute (to process the videos) and train the car’s computer."
Ah yeah I remember now. 
The decision of veering away from a car but towards a group of kids kind of thing. Difficult to program.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I can imagine we aren't far off it managing very quiet big roads in countries where there is wide expanse of land and not many towns (ie more simple to navigate hazards etc)
But managing a very busy country like the UK just still seems far fetched to me!
It's all a bit too skynet for me!! "
There’s still a healthy amount of skepticism / anticipation to see what it does in New York at Rush hour etc. It maybe that improvements are still necessary, but with the compute they have, updates and fixes should be quicker and easier, until there are no more fixes necessary!
I hear you on the skinny thing. LLMs like chat GPT inside robots like Optimus or the robots at Boston Dynamics are where I will be concerned. There are some developments at Open AI happening which we should all be watching very closely.
Hades
x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Some of the reckless idiots I've endured on the road this week are more scary than self driving cars."
The future they are predicting will mean that humans will be regarded as so dangerous compared to the safety of self-driving cars, that some governments will consider stopping humans driving at all.
Hades |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Some of the reckless idiots I've endured on the road this week are more scary than self driving cars.
The future they are predicting will mean that humans will be regarded as so dangerous compared to the safety of self-driving cars, that some governments will consider stopping humans driving at all.
Hades"
Insurance costs may help drive that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Should be a disaster on the small lanes around this way,dodging potholes and having to pass by pulling off the road onto muddy verges..see if a computer can judge how slippery and deep the mud is  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I can't wait for the day cars will be self-driving and self-navigating. Road management will be determined by the cars sending information to a central system, which will route them according to traffic flow on a particular route.
Accidents will be a rarity because human error will have been taken out of the equation.
M |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I doubt many on here follow Tesla, electric cars and the technology that goes in to them, so some people may not know that in the last 24 hours the news is that Tesla’s ‘Full Self-Driving’ (FSD) Version 12 is about to be released to employees, a step taken before wide release to purchasers of the software.
Musk has had Tesla FSD cars driving around North America for the last 3+ years on versions coded by software engineers, so what’s the significance of FSD Version 12 I hear you ask?
V12 unlike its predecessors, hasn’t got a line of Software-engineered code controlling the car, instead the car has written its own code using ‘Neural Nets’, ‘Inference’ and being shown videos of ‘good drivers’ driving.
Musk demonstrated an early version of V12 on the streets of Paulo Alto, California in September to some acclaim from watchers of the live stream and the word is, that the since much-improved Version 12 is mind blowing and ‘better than human drivers’.
I for one can’t wait for my car to pick me up from a night out, to drop Cherry and me off before going back home to charge and collect us at the end of the day. Maybe even be used as a driverless taxi, if I choose. But I know I’m necessarily in the majority.
So what about you? Will you get your car to drop you off at meets and pick you up? Would you get in a driverless ‘Robotaxi’? If you had FSD, would you have it go off and earn you money as a taxi?
Hades"
We live near the first ‘autonomous bus service’ going from Fife to Edinburgh. It’s a load of cobblers. Never seen it not being driven and worst of all (but not surprisingly) never seen anyone on it. R |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Some of the reckless idiots I've endured on the road this week are more scary than self driving cars.
The future they are predicting will mean that humans will be regarded as so dangerous compared to the safety of self-driving cars, that some governments will consider stopping humans driving at all.
Hades
Insurance costs may help drive that."
They may indeed. When Tesla are regulated, the company will take on the insurance liability. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I’m trusting my body to robotic surgery but I doubt I would sit comfortably in a robotic car. Daft really. But I like to understand the how’s and why’s."
If you want a very good nights sleep I can explain the whys and hows in meticulous boring detail  You wait until I’m sending my car to bring you to a dinner date with us !
I’ve got my fingers crossed for your surgery lady.
Hades
x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I’m trusting my body to robotic surgery but I doubt I would sit comfortably in a robotic car. Daft really. But I like to understand the how’s and why’s.
If you want a very good nights sleep I can explain the whys and hows in meticulous boring detail You wait until I’m sending my car to bring you to a dinner date with us !
I’ve got my fingers crossed for your surgery lady.
Hades
x"
Ah thanks Chuck x oh god don’t tempt me I bloody love finding out about things. Tell me all about the electric cars you filthy animal
Bloody looking forward to the other side of this nonsense and getting back to cake and socialising!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
This isn't the real issue with self driving cars.
Consider the moral dilemma of selecting between two hazards, the Trolley dilemma.
Any self driving car would have to make an active decision. This is premeditated algorithmic murder.
Consider the issue of driving behind a truck carrying heavy goods. If one of those items drops, it's likely to kill you. Your choice is to veer to the left, or to the right. To the left is a family car, carrying children. To your right is a motorcyclist. Which one should the car actively select?
Should it choose to prioritise your life by hitting them? Should it choose to select the family car because the motorcyclist would be in a more fatal condition, or should it choose to select the motorcyclist because it's just 1 life.
These are the moral quandaries we need to understand. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I think it's probably great for people who are unable to drive, due to health and other issues.
I read that US authorities have been concerned about the potential false promotions of safety in earlier versions.
I'm hoping that official scrutiny is exhaustive and that we don't get dangerously driven vehicles. And that personal data is protected |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I can imagine we aren't far off it managing very quiet big roads in countries where there is wide expanse of land and not many towns (ie more simple to navigate hazards etc)
But managing a very busy country like the UK just still seems far fetched to me!
It's all a bit too skynet for me!!
There’s still a healthy amount of skepticism / anticipation to see what it does in New York at Rush hour etc. It maybe that improvements are still necessary, but with the compute they have, updates and fixes should be quicker and easier, until there are no more fixes necessary.
Hades
x"
Well I expect honk it's horn for no good reason and drive in a straight line 20 yards until the next red light. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"This isn't the real issue with self driving cars.
Consider the moral dilemma of selecting between two hazards, the Trolley dilemma.
Any self driving car would have to make an active decision. This is premeditated algorithmic murder.
Consider the issue of driving behind a truck carrying heavy goods. If one of those items drops, it's likely to kill you. Your choice is to veer to the left, or to the right. To the left is a family car, carrying children. To your right is a motorcyclist. Which one should the car actively select?
Should it choose to prioritise your life by hitting them? Should it choose to select the family car because the motorcyclist would be in a more fatal condition, or should it choose to select the motorcyclist because it's just 1 life.
These are the moral quandaries we need to understand."
Why is this just an issue for self driving cars? Any driver, computer or human, would have to make the same choice if faced with the same circumstances.
If there is a really a moral conundrum then why are you driving in the first place? If you have the answer, which you must do because you are driving, then just tell the computer how to solve it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
If self driving cars are as good at driving as ChatGPT is at writing lab reports or answering exam questions, we should all be very worried indeed. Artificial intelligence isn't very intelligent, in my experience! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"This isn't the real issue with self driving cars.
Consider the moral dilemma of selecting between two hazards, the Trolley dilemma.
Any self driving car would have to make an active decision. This is premeditated algorithmic murder.
Consider the issue of driving behind a truck carrying heavy goods. If one of those items drops, it's likely to kill you. Your choice is to veer to the left, or to the right. To the left is a family car, carrying children. To your right is a motorcyclist. Which one should the car actively select?
Should it choose to prioritise your life by hitting them? Should it choose to select the family car because the motorcyclist would be in a more fatal condition, or should it choose to select the motorcyclist because it's just 1 life.
These are the moral quandaries we need to understand.
Why is this just an issue for self driving cars? Any driver, computer or human, would have to make the same choice if faced with the same circumstances.
If there is a really a moral conundrum then why are you driving in the first place? If you have the answer, which you must do because you are driving, then just tell the computer how to solve it."
It's a moral conundrum because the AI system will genuinely compute and make a rational choice. A deliberate choice. Most humans in such circumstances don't make a carefully calculated choice. They do whatever instinctively they FEEL is best and we all know feelings are definitely not rational. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *JB1954Man
over a year ago
Reading |
I have worked until retirement in December 2019 . In the automation industry. My job was mainly commissioning engineer. No matter how good programmer , commissioning engineer . There will be software ‘bugs’ . That depending on ‘conditions’ will cause a fault . You only have to look at the operating systems of phones , laptops and desktops . That problems do occur.
Plus for automated vehicles . They all will have to operate on the same ‘network’ . Plus have a non dropout internet connection. One dropout for less than a second will cause accidents.
So fully automated cars are many many years away . Especially in the Uk as places still do not have full fibre internet connections.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Just imagine if a few hundred people crammed into the same vehicle, went hundreds or thousands of miles without incident with just a driver to pull away and stop at the destination. In fact, the driver was only really there to take over in case the computer fucked up and was - statistically - more likely to fuck up than the computer was.
Welcome to air travel since 1970-something... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Just imagine if a few hundred people crammed into the same vehicle, went hundreds or thousands of miles without incident with just a driver to pull away and stop at the destination. In fact, the driver was only really there to take over in case the computer fucked up and was - statistically - more likely to fuck up than the computer was.
Welcome to air travel since 1970-something... "
Except... Cars are more numerous, are kinda on a 2D plane and therefore more susceptible to the risk of collisions, and share a space with pedestrians, bicycles, trucks, buildings, etc etc |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Don’t trust them.
A computer has no empathy. If a computer is driving down the road and a situation happens where it either has to swerve into 3 dogs or 1 child. It would choose the child as there is only one so the casualty rate is lower.
The mr |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"This isn't the real issue with self driving cars.
Consider the moral dilemma of selecting between two hazards, the Trolley dilemma.
Any self driving car would have to make an active decision. This is premeditated algorithmic murder.
Consider the issue of driving behind a truck carrying heavy goods. If one of those items drops, it's likely to kill you. Your choice is to veer to the left, or to the right. To the left is a family car, carrying children. To your right is a motorcyclist. Which one should the car actively select?
Should it choose to prioritise your life by hitting them? Should it choose to select the family car because the motorcyclist would be in a more fatal condition, or should it choose to select the motorcyclist because it's just 1 life.
These are the moral quandaries we need to understand."
Most likely it will choose the motorcyclist as the lowest insurance payout. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"This isn't the real issue with self driving cars.
Consider the moral dilemma of selecting between two hazards, the Trolley dilemma.
Any self driving car would have to make an active decision. This is premeditated algorithmic murder.
Consider the issue of driving behind a truck carrying heavy goods. If one of those items drops, it's likely to kill you. Your choice is to veer to the left, or to the right. To the left is a family car, carrying children. To your right is a motorcyclist. Which one should the car actively select?
Should it choose to prioritise your life by hitting them? Should it choose to select the family car because the motorcyclist would be in a more fatal condition, or should it choose to select the motorcyclist because it's just 1 life.
These are the moral quandaries we need to understand.
Why is this just an issue for self driving cars? Any driver, computer or human, would have to make the same choice if faced with the same circumstances.
If there is a really a moral conundrum then why are you driving in the first place? If you have the answer, which you must do because you are driving, then just tell the computer how to solve it.
It's a moral conundrum because the AI system will genuinely compute and make a rational choice. A deliberate choice. Most humans in such circumstances don't make a carefully calculated choice. They do whatever instinctively they FEEL is best and we all know feelings are definitely not rational. "
So isn’t the _real_ moral conundrum actually whether we should let humans drive at all if they are not capable of making a carefully calculated choice?
Seems weird that we would be more concerned about something that tries to make a calculated choice but fails than we are about something that doesn’t even try to make a calculated choice.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"This isn't the real issue with self driving cars.
Consider the moral dilemma of selecting between two hazards, the Trolley dilemma.
Any self driving car would have to make an active decision. This is premeditated algorithmic murder.
Consider the issue of driving behind a truck carrying heavy goods. If one of those items drops, it's likely to kill you. Your choice is to veer to the left, or to the right. To the left is a family car, carrying children. To your right is a motorcyclist. Which one should the car actively select?
Should it choose to prioritise your life by hitting them? Should it choose to select the family car because the motorcyclist would be in a more fatal condition, or should it choose to select the motorcyclist because it's just 1 life.
These are the moral quandaries we need to understand.
Why is this just an issue for self driving cars? Any driver, computer or human, would have to make the same choice if faced with the same circumstances.
If there is a really a moral conundrum then why are you driving in the first place? If you have the answer, which you must do because you are driving, then just tell the computer how to solve it.
It's a moral conundrum because the AI system will genuinely compute and make a rational choice. A deliberate choice. Most humans in such circumstances don't make a carefully calculated choice. They do whatever instinctively they FEEL is best and we all know feelings are definitely not rational.
So isn’t the _real_ moral conundrum actually whether we should let humans drive at all if they are not capable of making a carefully calculated choice?
Seems weird that we would be more concerned about something that tries to make a calculated choice but fails than we are about something that doesn’t even try to make a calculated choice. "
You'd think. However the outcome of said algorithmic choices is tantamount to premeditated murder |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'm definitely looking forward to the improvements of v12.
However, I think we need the coders and people working on it to live in the UK to fully understand the driving style here.
The computer just can't understand parked cars on a road and disengaged. Also round abouts and you need to take over.
It works great in North America but very poorly here unless you're on the motorway which is similar to Roads over there.
Would I get in a driverless car, absolutely. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Mentioning driverless cars seems to send all motorists into an absolute rage.
Which reveals the problem- every driver believes that they are perfect and everyone else is the problem.
Personally I think the roads would be loads better and safer with only AI cars. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *TG3Man
over a year ago
Dorchester |
Its all a matter of time technology marches on whether we like it or not, driving for me is the actual feel of driving, the speed the art of driving and technology and money to support the the local police force get in the way of the enjoyment, you just have to accept that every now and again something will come along to ruin it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Question.
Do you need a driving license for a self driving car...????no you dont even need eyes so blindfolded is acceptable  "
That'll please Stevie Wonder then |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Question.
Do you need a driving license for a self driving car...????"
That’s actually….. a great fucking question.
My teenage kid is a wiz on computers and can open apps on a phone.
Also, a computer or phone never crashes……
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *TG3Man
over a year ago
Dorchester |
"Question.
Do you need a driving license for a self driving car...????no you dont even need eyes so blindfolded is acceptable
That'll please Stevie Wonder then"
have you seen his sister? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
They have just been withdrawn in the US after a load of accidents with the trial ones- this is from Reuter's website. It seems the final straw was when one ran someone over & then wouldn't move off them, so they had to get a machine in to lift it off
SAN FRANCISCO/WASHINGTON, Oct 24 (Reuters) - California on Tuesday ordered General Motors' (GM.N) Cruise unit to remove its driverless cars from state roads, calling the vehicles a risk to the public and saying the company had "misrepresented" the safety of the technology.
California's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) said it suspended Cruise's autonomous vehicle deployment and driverless testing permit, ending efforts by the company for the time being to test the cars without safety drivers.
"Based upon the performance of the vehicles, the department determines the manufacturer's vehicles are not safe for the public's operation," the DMV said in a statement, citing "an unreasonable risk to public safety."
The DMV added that Cruise had "misrepresented any information related to safety of the autonomous technology of its vehicles." The state agency said Cruise is allowed to challenge the suspension within five days. The company did not say if it planned to do that.
The suspension, following a series of accidents involving Cruise vehicles, is a major setback to the self-driving business that GM has called a major growth opportunity and to the autonomous vehicle (AV) industry. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Question.
Do you need a driving license for a self driving car...????no you dont even need eyes so blindfolded is acceptable
That'll please Stevie Wonder thenhave you seen his sister? "
No but I hear she's better at Rubik's cube than he is |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Seriously speaking, it can only be a good thing. If all cars are self driving, the number of accidents would be reduced massively. Sure there are some ethical questions. Hopefully the cars aren't put in a situation where these ethical dilemmas come into picture. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Really don't know how to feel about this whole debate, as a biker I see the absolute worst of drivers every single day and some of those people having decision making relegated? Good thing..
On the other hand. How does this account for the decision making based on experience and reaction to every single given circumstance can't be possible. There's always that chance, however unlikely, that something comes up the car can't anticipate or react to correctly or acts how it thinks it should, wrongly..take the guy killed by the production line robot due to a sensor failure recently |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *TG3Man
over a year ago
Dorchester |
"Question.
Do you need a driving license for a self driving car...????no you dont even need eyes so blindfolded is acceptable
That'll please Stevie Wonder thenhave you seen his sister?
No but I hear she's better at Rubik's cube than he is"
surely they just say "done it" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The motorways are going to be filled with cars with people having sex in the back seat. It's gonna be wild."
And in reality world where the rest of us live... it'll be jammed up motorways of car's going fucking nowhere because every man, woman, child, cat and fluffy bunny will have a car!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"They have just been withdrawn in the US after a load of accidents with the trial ones- this is from Reuter's website. It seems the final straw was when one ran someone over & then wouldn't move off them, so they had to get a machine in to lift it off
SAN FRANCISCO/WASHINGTON, Oct 24 (Reuters) - California on Tuesday ordered General Motors' (GM.N) Cruise unit to remove its driverless cars from state roads, calling the vehicles a risk to the public and saying the company had "misrepresented" the safety of the technology.
California's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) said it suspended Cruise's autonomous vehicle deployment and driverless testing permit, ending efforts by the company for the time being to test the cars without safety drivers.
"Based upon the performance of the vehicles, the department determines the manufacturer's vehicles are not safe for the public's operation," the DMV said in a statement, citing "an unreasonable risk to public safety."
The DMV added that Cruise had "misrepresented any information related to safety of the autonomous technology of its vehicles." The state agency said Cruise is allowed to challenge the suspension within five days. The company did not say if it planned to do that.
The suspension, following a series of accidents involving Cruise vehicles, is a major setback to the self-driving business that GM has called a major growth opportunity and to the autonomous vehicle (AV) industry."
Yeah Cruise which it appears was fibbing about the kind of autonomy it was using, had been caught out lying to regulators. Cruise’s license being withdrawn should not be mistaken for all autonomous vehicle licenses being withdrawn.
Waymo has been in two collisions in the last year and neither were its fault. It has issues in terms of economic viability but Robotaxis are not bad across the board.
Tesla hasn’t applied for its license yet, but I suspect it will within the year, depending on the progress of V12, which I also suspect will be easily good enough.
Hades |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *TG3Man
over a year ago
Dorchester |
"Really don't know how to feel about this whole debate, as a biker I see the absolute worst of drivers every single day and some of those people having decision making relegated? Good thing..
On the other hand. How does this account for the decision making based on experience and reaction to every single given circumstance can't be possible. There's always that chance, however unlikely, that something comes up the car can't anticipate or react to correctly or acts how it thinks it should, wrongly..take the guy killed by the production line robot due to a sensor failure recently "
Exactly machines go wrong, how would you feel if a relative or friend was killed by a machine going wrong and who is at fault surely the manufacturer? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Really don't know how to feel about this whole debate, as a biker I see the absolute worst of drivers every single day and some of those people having decision making relegated? Good thing..
On the other hand. How does this account for the decision making based on experience and reaction to every single given circumstance can't be possible. There's always that chance, however unlikely, that something comes up the car can't anticipate or react to correctly or acts how it thinks it should, wrongly..take the guy killed by the production line robot due to a sensor failure recently Exactly machines go wrong, how would you feel if a relative or friend was killed by a machine going wrong and who is at fault surely the manufacturer? "
Dude you seriously need to stop watching Terminator films... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Really don't know how to feel about this whole debate, as a biker I see the absolute worst of drivers every single day and some of those people having decision making relegated? Good thing..
On the other hand. How does this account for the decision making based on experience and reaction to every single given circumstance can't be possible. There's always that chance, however unlikely, that something comes up the car can't anticipate or react to correctly or acts how it thinks it should, wrongly..take the guy killed by the production line robot due to a sensor failure recently Exactly machines go wrong, how would you feel if a relative or friend was killed by a machine going wrong and who is at fault surely the manufacturer? "
I think the who's at fault thing is overplayed, for me it's the "how much are we willing to accept risk"
How can we quantify the risk of the developing technology, doubtless it will continue to get better, whens th right time to just trust it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Should be a disaster on the small lanes around this way,dodging potholes and having to pass by pulling off the road onto muddy verges..see if a computer can judge how slippery and deep the mud is "
I absolutely understand the skepticism, they haven’t been seen in this country yet, but they learning from humans, so using inference it will drive as any other human-controlled Tesla would. I hope it’s a pleasant suprise when they drive
Hades |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *TG3Man
over a year ago
Dorchester |
"Really don't know how to feel about this whole debate, as a biker I see the absolute worst of drivers every single day and some of those people having decision making relegated? Good thing..
On the other hand. How does this account for the decision making based on experience and reaction to every single given circumstance can't be possible. There's always that chance, however unlikely, that something comes up the car can't anticipate or react to correctly or acts how it thinks it should, wrongly..take the guy killed by the production line robot due to a sensor failure recently Exactly machines go wrong, how would you feel if a relative or friend was killed by a machine going wrong and who is at fault surely the manufacturer?
Dude you seriously need to stop watching Terminator films... "
omg they can transform as well |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Fully behind it. So many bad drivers out there. "
They will likely roll out some driver safety aspects of FSD for free to decrease accidents. They have already rolled out emergency braking when cars cross in front of Tesla’s. Apparently this is a hard thing to achieve using the cars sensors / cameras.
Hades |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Mentioning driverless cars seems to send all motorists into an absolute rage.
Which reveals the problem- every driver believes that they are perfect and everyone else is the problem.
Personally I think the roads would be loads better and safer with only AI cars."
Humans will have to have special dispensation to be able to drive at some point. The goal is to make the multiple times safer than humans.
Hades
x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have worked until retirement in December 2019 . In the automation industry. My job was mainly commissioning engineer. No matter how good programmer , commissioning engineer . There will be software ‘bugs’ . That depending on ‘conditions’ will cause a fault . You only have to look at the operating systems of phones , laptops and desktops . That problems do occur.
Plus for automated vehicles . They all will have to operate on the same ‘network’ . Plus have a non dropout internet connection. One dropout for less than a second will cause accidents.
So fully automated cars are many many years away . Especially in the Uk as places still do not have full fibre internet connections.
"
FSD has been in Beta for a few years to iron out the bugs. The difference with this version of self driving though is that there shouldn’t be as many bugs from the outset, with the car having driving millions of miles more than any human in training.
The cars won’t need to be attached to the network to drive, in fact Musks claim is that they won’t even need maps, although the proof will be in the pudding. There are lost claims to fulfil, but having made them I have every confidence in Musk to deliver.
Hades |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I can imagine we aren't far off it managing very quiet big roads in countries where there is wide expanse of land and not many towns (ie more simple to navigate hazards etc)
But managing a very busy country like the UK just still seems far fetched to me!
It's all a bit too skynet for me!!
There’s still a healthy amount of skepticism / anticipation to see what it does in New York at Rush hour etc. It maybe that improvements are still necessary, but with the compute they have, updates and fixes should be quicker and easier, until there are no more fixes necessary.
Hades
x
Well I expect honk it's horn for no good reason and drive in a straight line 20 yards until the next red light. "
When in Rome |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Really don't know how to feel about this whole debate, as a biker I see the absolute worst of drivers every single day and some of those people having decision making relegated? Good thing..
On the other hand. How does this account for the decision making based on experience and reaction to every single given circumstance can't be possible. There's always that chance, however unlikely, that something comes up the car can't anticipate or react to correctly or acts how it thinks it should, wrongly..take the guy killed by the production line robot due to a sensor failure recently Exactly machines go wrong, how would you feel if a relative or friend was killed by a machine going wrong and who is at fault surely the manufacturer?
I think the who's at fault thing is overplayed, for me it's the "how much are we willing to accept risk"
How can we quantify the risk of the developing technology, doubtless it will continue to get better, whens th right time to just trust it?"
That’s a good question and probably the key question for regulators. If they drive for months without intervention, would it be appropriaate to license them?
I know the ambitions with this are world-wide, so there’s a lot of regulation to overcome.
Hades
x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The motorways are going to be filled with cars with people having sex in the back seat. It's gonna be wild.
And in reality world where the rest of us live... it'll be jammed up motorways of car's going fucking nowhere because every man, woman, child, cat and fluffy bunny will have a car!!!"
That's where it gets interesting. There are a couple of companies which are planning to launch flying cars in the US in 2025. They are already testing the flying cars. So your traffic problem is solved  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have worked until retirement in December 2019 . In the automation industry. My job was mainly commissioning engineer. No matter how good programmer , commissioning engineer . There will be software ‘bugs’ . That depending on ‘conditions’ will cause a fault . You only have to look at the operating systems of phones , laptops and desktops . That problems do occur.
Plus for automated vehicles . They all will have to operate on the same ‘network’ . Plus have a non dropout internet connection. One dropout for less than a second will cause accidents.
So fully automated cars are many many years away . Especially in the Uk as places still do not have full fibre internet connections.
FSD has been in Beta for a few years to iron out the bugs. The difference with this version of self driving though is that there shouldn’t be as many bugs from the outset, with the car having driving millions of miles more than any human in training.
The cars won’t need to be attached to the network to drive, in fact Musks claim is that they won’t even need maps, although the proof will be in the pudding. There are lost claims to fulfil, but having made them I have every confidence in Musk to deliver.
Hades"
I have zero confidence in Musk to do anything. He's just the gob and the money behind the outfit. Actual engineers are the ones making it (maybe) a reality. Musk is a tin pot plonker who needs to be reined in, quite frankly. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I always roll my eyes when people start citing SD car accidents from five years ago.
How many accidents have there been in human piloted cars since then?"
Perfectly put, well-made point. Humans piloted cars have been responsible for the death of more than a million people this year. At some point humans will need likely be stopped from driving, just from an insurance point of view if nothing else.
Hades |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The motorways are going to be filled with cars with people having sex in the back seat. It's gonna be wild.
And in reality world where the rest of us live... it'll be jammed up motorways of car's going fucking nowhere because every man, woman, child, cat and fluffy bunny will have a car!!!
That's where it gets interesting. There are a couple of companies which are planning to launch flying cars in the US in 2025. They are already testing the flying cars. So your traffic problem is solved "
There are! Some of them look really interesting too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aretobareCouple
over a year ago
Central Portugal |
We have a Tesla and must admit that after experiencing the simplicity, vastly reduced fuel costs (Ours runs off our solar 90% of the time), reliability and ease to drive they do make ICE cars look so backwards. The fact it has far more features now than when we bought it is also a bonus. We still don't trust the autopilot more due to the width of the cars and the narrowness of Portuguese roads. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There are also other companies working on self driving cars. I expect them to collaborate soon and set some standards on how the cars navigate, in order to improve safety"
I don’t expect them to collaborate on technology, but they may get together to decide on protocols of how Autonomous Vehicles fit in safely with each other and with human drivers. Each car though has its own sensors and software to ensure safety from all other cars, so I don’t think it’s a complete necessity.
Hades |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Some of the reckless idiots I've endured on the road this week are more scary than self driving cars.
The future they are predicting will mean that humans will be regarded as so dangerous compared to the safety of self-driving cars, that some governments will consider stopping humans driving at all.
Hades"
over my dead body. I drive my car recreationally I don't often like other humans driving me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"We have a Tesla and must admit that after experiencing the simplicity, vastly reduced fuel costs (Ours runs off our solar 90% of the time), reliability and ease to drive they do make ICE cars look so backwards. The fact it has far more features now than when we bought it is also a bonus. We still don't trust the autopilot more due to the width of the cars and the narrowness of Portuguese roads."
Our plan is to do exactly this, solar panels, batteries and an electric car, more than likely a Tesla, because of they’re enormous technological advances of the rest of the market.
Have you worked out how much each mile costs? I have heard quotes of 3/4p per mile.
Hades
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"i just don’t understand why anyone is pursuing this, I mean, who first thought of the idea of a driverless car? Why do they think we need this kind of tech?"
There is a good chance that driverless cars will replace Taxi's, Busses, and lorries... basically anything that currently requires PAYING a driver just for driving.
One of the favoured "models" for cars of the future, is that subscription services will replace ownership. Rather than owning a car, you will just summon one through an app whenever you require one. No need to pay for parking, no issues with charging, etc. It is a model that might work well for large cities, but certainly isn't ideal for everyone.
Cal |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Some of the reckless idiots I've endured on the road this week are more scary than self driving cars.
The future they are predicting will mean that humans will be regarded as so dangerous compared to the safety of self-driving cars, that some governments will consider stopping humans driving at all.
Hadesover my dead body. I drive my car recreationally I don't often like other humans driving me "
Same! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I like driving and I'm good at it, careful and I don't speed. I do however like being in control of my car, I love shifting from gear to gear, and hitting the sweet spot before changing. Driving has always been 1 of the few things that has always given me joy, even on traffic packed roads.
If it is possible to switch the AI off at times and take control when I wanted then I would be happy enough with the car driving itself at times. If not, I would miss the joys of driving. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I like driving and I'm good at it, careful and I don't speed. I do however like being in control of my car, I love shifting from gear to gear, and hitting the sweet spot before changing. Driving has always been 1 of the few things that has always given me joy, even on traffic packed roads.
If it is possible to switch the AI off at times and take control when I wanted then I would be happy enough with the car driving itself at times. If not, I would miss the joys of driving. "
Tesla’s FSD is driver activated. So it’s off until you ask it to take over for you. If we do get to the point where humans are prevented from driving by Governments, it’ll be because of public outcry as a result of safety concerns / accident statistics so that’s will be years from where we are now.
FSD is a paid-for addition to Tesla cars and even when you’ve paid for it, you don’t have to use it.
Hades |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I like driving and I'm good at it, careful and I don't speed. I do however like being in control of my car, I love shifting from gear to gear, and hitting the sweet spot before changing. Driving has always been 1 of the few things that has always given me joy, even on traffic packed roads.
If it is possible to switch the AI off at times and take control when I wanted then I would be happy enough with the car driving itself at times. If not, I would miss the joys of driving.
Tesla’s FSD is driver activated. So it’s off until you ask it to take over for you. If we do get to the point where humans are prevented from driving by Governments, it’ll be because of public outcry as a result of safety concerns / accident statistics so that’s will be years from where we are now.
FSD is a paid-for addition to Tesla cars and even when you’ve paid for it, you don’t have to use it.
Hades"
That sounds like something a can get onboard with then, pardon the pun  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Think it's a great idea IF they can start sharing information with each other. A nice little motor hivemind. Imagine the reduction in crashes of they all worked with each other |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
I have zero confidence in Musk to do anything. He's just the gob and the money behind the outfit. Actual engineers are the ones making it (maybe) a reality. Musk is a tin pot plonker who needs to be reined in, quite frankly. "
Which is interesting as many people at the top of their fields comment on his ability to dialogue with them at the highest level and then do the same thing in someone in a completely differant industry.
I'm not a fan of musk (or a hater) but it's surprising you would question his ability or competency |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Musk reduced the sensors to cut costs. Thats all you need to know.
Then they released a promo video with the wheel whizzing back and forth as the car tried to drive in a straight line, ignored a STOP sign, and nearly mowed down a pedestrian. In their promo vid!
The Tech isn’t quite there yet, and the spinmongers aren’t trustworthy. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm not a fan of musk (or a hater) but it's surprising you would question his ability or competency "
I would 100% question both his ability and competency.
He’s a stoned lunatic spending his inheritance. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"i just don’t understand why anyone is pursuing this, I mean, who first thought of the idea of a driverless car? Why do they think we need this kind of tech?"
Their profits
The motivation to help get d*unk drivers not to drive, to get disabled people out of isolated lives, etc isn't a driving force |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
He’s a stoned lunatic spending his inheritance. "
Stoned ? You talking about the podcast where he attempted to smoke week hahahaa
Lunatic I agree with.
He inherited 100s of billions of dollars? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm not a fan of musk (or a hater) but it's surprising you would question his ability or competency
I would 100% question both his ability and competency.
He’s a stoned lunatic spending his inheritance. "
How much did he inherit? What's his net worth now? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
I have zero confidence in Musk to do anything. He's just the gob and the money behind the outfit. Actual engineers are the ones making it (maybe) a reality. Musk is a tin pot plonker who needs to be reined in, quite frankly.
Which is interesting as many people at the top of their fields comment on his ability to dialogue with them at the highest level and then do the same thing in someone in a completely differant industry.
I'm not a fan of musk (or a hater) but it's surprising you would question his ability or competency "
People like to shit on successful people. Is he a jerk? Yes. Is he incompetent? Not at all.
The world needs people like him who are willing to invest money on big but risky innovations. Without Tesla, the world would still be waiting for the terrible electric vehicles built by the age old automobile manufacturers like Ford and Volkswagen. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
I have zero confidence in Musk to do anything. He's just the gob and the money behind the outfit. Actual engineers are the ones making it (maybe) a reality. Musk is a tin pot plonker who needs to be reined in, quite frankly.
Which is interesting as many people at the top of their fields comment on his ability to dialogue with them at the highest level and then do the same thing in someone in a completely differant industry.
I'm not a fan of musk (or a hater) but it's surprising you would question his ability or competency
People like to shit on successful people. Is he a jerk? Yes. Is he incompetent? Not at all.
The world needs people like him who are willing to invest money on big but risky innovations. Without Tesla, the world would still be waiting for the terrible electric vehicles built by the age old automobile manufacturers like Ford and Volkswagen."
Musk is a deeply unpleasant person, from what I can make out. There are plenty of other successful people in the world and with whom I have no issue.
Musk hasn't designed or engineered the Tesla vehicles. He acquired the company and has led/fronted and financed it. The people developing the autonomous tech are the engineers and scientists in the background, it is their work that may well finish up with fully autonomous vehicles and whose work has resulted in the electric cars on the road now.
I would suggest that these engineers and scientists are also very successful people and I have, again, zero issue with them.
I don't drive an electric car because at present, they are too expensive; the infrastructure is completely unaccessible to wheelchair users and so far, every single electric car I've investigated has insufficient boot height and space to take a rigid frame wheelchair without taking it to bits. This means the product is utterly useless to me at present. I remain in my adapted 12yo diesel estate car for now. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Driverless cars aren't a potential. Its the reality and its coming quick. HGV driver jobs will fall off a cliff
Surprises me people can't see the benefit of a system that doesn't get tired, make silly mistakes or poor decisions. Cars already read road signs and make decisions based off of them now and that's without the innovations currently in hand |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *hillenCouple
over a year ago
Borehamwood |
On motorways and larger roads then yes. But on the 1000s of miles of single track roads I can't see how it'd work. A car and a van meet and one has to reverse back to find a passing place. The car has another 3 behind it while the van is followed by a tractor and would need to reverse uphill. How would everyday situations like this be resolved? Humans generally reconcile this by a form of non verbal negotiation which I don't believe an self driving vehicle could achieve. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
I have zero confidence in Musk to do anything. He's just the gob and the money behind the outfit. Actual engineers are the ones making it (maybe) a reality. Musk is a tin pot plonker who needs to be reined in, quite frankly.
Which is interesting as many people at the top of their fields comment on his ability to dialogue with them at the highest level and then do the same thing in someone in a completely differant industry.
I'm not a fan of musk (or a hater) but it's surprising you would question his ability or competency
People like to shit on successful people. Is he a jerk? Yes. Is he incompetent? Not at all.
The world needs people like him who are willing to invest money on big but risky innovations. Without Tesla, the world would still be waiting for the terrible electric vehicles built by the age old automobile manufacturers like Ford and Volkswagen.
Musk is a deeply unpleasant person, from what I can make out. There are plenty of other successful people in the world and with whom I have no issue.
Musk hasn't designed or engineered the Tesla vehicles. He acquired the company and has led/fronted and financed it. The people developing the autonomous tech are the engineers and scientists in the background, it is their work that may well finish up with fully autonomous vehicles and whose work has resulted in the electric cars on the road now.
I would suggest that these engineers and scientists are also very successful people and I have, again, zero issue with them.
I don't drive an electric car because at present, they are too expensive; the infrastructure is completely unaccessible to wheelchair users and so far, every single electric car I've investigated has insufficient boot height and space to take a rigid frame wheelchair without taking it to bits. This means the product is utterly useless to me at present. I remain in my adapted 12yo diesel estate car for now. "
I 100% agree that he is an unpleasant person. He is a narcissistic asshole if we are being frank
I also understand why you don't want to use electric cars.
It's unfair to ignore his contribution to Tesla by saying he is just an investor. Engineers can come up with ideas. But you need a CEO who backs these ideas and take the risk in the process. Every big company is filled with innovative people who wish their senior leaders had the appetite to take risks, instead of just playing it safe, making profits to keep shareholders happy.
It's not like Musk doesn't focus on profits. But he is willing to take risks be it with pricing or supercharger strategies or with self driving. You just have to see how volatile Tesla stocks are. A guy from my university works at Tesla and his views about him have been mostly positive. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"On motorways and larger roads then yes. But on the 1000s of miles of single track roads I can't see how it'd work. A car and a van meet and one has to reverse back to find a passing place. The car has another 3 behind it while the van is followed by a tractor and would need to reverse uphill. How would everyday situations like this be resolved? Humans generally reconcile this by a form of non verbal negotiation which I don't believe an self driving vehicle could achieve. "
If they were connected to each other... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Why? ^^^
Do you genuinely think in 50 years we won't look back and be astounded we accepted 100s of thousands of people a year died in car crashes?
Driverless cars are coming, the same way people who thought horse drawn carts weren't going anywhere, piloted cars will die a death |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Previous versions of FSD have been in beta for a few years, in the legal and pre-read instructions it’s says clearly that FSD will make mistakes at a time when you least expect it and that human supervision of that beta software requires human supervision.
FSD V12 is a complete departure from previous code-written driving. What Tesla have achieved is a way of training an AI model by showing it video and it learning how to drive from that. An equally great achievement is that they have also given their supercomputer the ability to create AI-generated driving scenes and driving through them as a way of training itself.
What that means is the computer can train itself and do so 24 hours a day, 7 days per week. As a result over the course of this new V12 build, the computer has driven millions and million of miles in training through very difficult driving situations and anything the software engineers can throw at it.
The V12 demo driving by Musk earlier this year demonstrated that the computer has gone from not being able to drive at all in November 2022 to accomplished by August / September 2023. Since then Tesla has spent of hundreds of millions of training hardware and are no longer compute-constrained.
Musk is polarising, but in fact he is an engineer and is a CEO who understands in granular detail the challenges that his engineers face and understands how to solve them. The man is tortured and arguably haunted to the point of believing in working to the point of exhaustion. He is a visionary and has a personality (love it or hate it) which has and will change the world, in my assessment for the better.
As for self-driving, it’s coming. It will lead to transport, in cars which don’t pump out poisonous fumes and which cost a fraction of what they do now per mile. We can either angrily shake our fists at the sky, or we can accept it.
Hades
x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Previous versions of FSD have been in beta for a few years, in the legal and pre-read instructions it’s says clearly that FSD will make mistakes at a time when you least expect it and that human supervision of that beta software requires human supervision.
FSD V12 is a complete departure from previous code-written driving. What Tesla have achieved is a way of training an AI model by showing it video and it learning how to drive from that. An equally great achievement is that they have also given their supercomputer the ability to create AI-generated driving scenes and driving through them as a way of training itself.
What that means is the computer can train itself and do so 24 hours a day, 7 days per week. As a result over the course of this new V12 build, the computer has driven millions and million of miles in training through very difficult driving situations and anything the software engineers can throw at it.
The V12 demo driving by Musk earlier this year demonstrated that the computer has gone from not being able to drive at all in November 2022 to accomplished by August / September 2023. Since then Tesla has spent of hundreds of millions of training hardware and are no longer compute-constrained.
Musk is polarising, but in fact he is an engineer and is a CEO who understands in granular detail the challenges that his engineers face and understands how to solve them. The man is tortured and arguably haunted to the point of believing in working to the point of exhaustion. He is a visionary and has a personality (love it or hate it) which has and will change the world, in my assessment for the better.
As for self-driving, it’s coming. It will lead to transport, in cars which don’t pump out poisonous fumes and which cost a fraction of what they do now per mile. We can either angrily shake our fists at the sky, or we can accept it.
Hades
x"
I've not read all the in between posts but I've read your first and last posts Hades. Your knowledge is a bit sexy and rather persuasive!
J |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Previous versions of FSD have been in beta for a few years, in the legal and pre-read instructions it’s says clearly that FSD will make mistakes at a time when you least expect it and that human supervision of that beta software requires human supervision.
FSD V12 is a complete departure from previous code-written driving. What Tesla have achieved is a way of training an AI model by showing it video and it learning how to drive from that. An equally great achievement is that they have also given their supercomputer the ability to create AI-generated driving scenes and driving through them as a way of training itself.
What that means is the computer can train itself and do so 24 hours a day, 7 days per week. As a result over the course of this new V12 build, the computer has driven millions and million of miles in training through very difficult driving situations and anything the software engineers can throw at it.
The V12 demo driving by Musk earlier this year demonstrated that the computer has gone from not being able to drive at all in November 2022 to accomplished by August / September 2023. Since then Tesla has spent of hundreds of millions of training hardware and are no longer compute-constrained.
Musk is polarising, but in fact he is an engineer and is a CEO who understands in granular detail the challenges that his engineers face and understands how to solve them. The man is tortured and arguably haunted to the point of believing in working to the point of exhaustion. He is a visionary and has a personality (love it or hate it) which has and will change the world, in my assessment for the better.
As for self-driving, it’s coming. It will lead to transport, in cars which don’t pump out poisonous fumes and which cost a fraction of what they do now per mile. We can either angrily shake our fists at the sky, or we can accept it.
Hades
x
I've not read all the in between posts but I've read your first and last posts Hades. Your knowledge is a bit sexy and rather persuasive!
J"
I can be very persuasive when I want to be J 
Hades
x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"https://youtu.be/ixp0kiWoxlA?si=0dyPCOyaHQXD-1Q7
Watch this and you won't be to much of a rush for driverless Tesla's.
Blowing through stop signs seems super safe "
V12 doesn’t miss stop signs. It’s trained entirely differently. Interestingly, from the data collected by their cars only 0.5 percent of drivers actually stop at stop signs. The rest actually roll them at low speed. Tesla had to curate the training video it showed the supercomputer to teach it to stop at stop signs. In practice, when current V11 software stops at stop signs they get beeped at by drivers behind.
There’s a lot of FUD and misinformation both about Musk and Tesla out there by haters, rivals big oil to name but a few. The data though shows that Tesla is not what the haters say it is. The stop sign issue is resolved in V12. There’s not much more I can say about that.
Hades |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"https://youtu.be/ixp0kiWoxlA?si=0dyPCOyaHQXD-1Q7
Watch this and you won't be to much of a rush for driverless Tesla's.
Blowing through stop signs seems super safe
V12 doesn’t miss stop signs. It’s trained entirely differently. Interestingly, from the data collected by their cars only 0.5 percent of drivers actually stop at stop signs. The rest actually roll them at low speed. Tesla had to curate the training video it showed the supercomputer to teach it to stop at stop signs. In practice, when current V11 software stops at stop signs they get beeped at by drivers behind.
There’s a lot of FUD and misinformation both about Musk and Tesla out there by haters, rivals big oil to name but a few. The data though shows that Tesla is not what the haters say it is. The stop sign issue is resolved in V12. There’s not much more I can say about that.
Hades"
The video linked shows a Tesla self driving car blowing through a stop sign, along with other near misses. The two people in the video are clearly fanbois who brush it off.
I'll believe my own eyes, if it's all the same. It's right there, and is not unambiguous. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"https://youtu.be/ixp0kiWoxlA?si=0dyPCOyaHQXD-1Q7
Watch this and you won't be to much of a rush for driverless Tesla's.
Blowing through stop signs seems super safe
V12 doesn’t miss stop signs. It’s trained entirely differently. Interestingly, from the data collected by their cars only 0.5 percent of drivers actually stop at stop signs. The rest actually roll them at low speed. Tesla had to curate the training video it showed the supercomputer to teach it to stop at stop signs. In practice, when current V11 software stops at stop signs they get beeped at by drivers behind.
There’s a lot of FUD and misinformation both about Musk and Tesla out there by haters, rivals big oil to name but a few. The data though shows that Tesla is not what the haters say it is. The stop sign issue is resolved in V12. There’s not much more I can say about that.
Hades
The video linked shows a Tesla self driving car blowing through a stop sign, along with other near misses. The two people in the video are clearly fanbois who brush it off.
I'll believe my own eyes, if it's all the same. It's right there, and is not unambiguous."
Not ambiguous  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why? ^^^
Do you genuinely think in 50 years we won't look back and be astounded we accepted 100s of thousands of people a year died in car crashes?
Driverless cars are coming, the same way people who thought horse drawn carts weren't going anywhere, piloted cars will die a death"
I've no doubt its will be the norm one day. Just don't believe its around the corner. To many pitfalls and glitches at the moment has shown in the video I posted.Even in the US where the infrastructure is more car friendly. Our roads are miles away. Towns have been doing away with car space and we have many more other road users randomly crossing our paths.
Am all for new technology, have a fully electric car I bought 4 years ago before the public hullabaloo started.
Just think self drive are a while away. But agree they will make roads safer, eventually. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"https://youtu.be/ixp0kiWoxlA?si=0dyPCOyaHQXD-1Q7
Watch this and you won't be to much of a rush for driverless Tesla's.
Blowing through stop signs seems super safe
V12 doesn’t miss stop signs. It’s trained entirely differently. Interestingly, from the data collected by their cars only 0.5 percent of drivers actually stop at stop signs. The rest actually roll them at low speed. Tesla had to curate the training video it showed the supercomputer to teach it to stop at stop signs. In practice, when current V11 software stops at stop signs they get beeped at by drivers behind.
There’s a lot of FUD and misinformation both about Musk and Tesla out there by haters, rivals big oil to name but a few. The data though shows that Tesla is not what the haters say it is. The stop sign issue is resolved in V12. There’s not much more I can say about that.
Hades"
Haven't read through the entire thread but I agree with this. People look at one or two videos that mJe headlines about Teslas because quite frankly they are market leaders here and are facing the might of the traditional auto industry.
I've kept up with the tech and overall I think they are way ahead here but they will constantly get blocked where possible. The EU did a lot to slow progress thanks to a certain country protecting its industry.
Won't stop it though, driverless cars are coming. How soon? Hard to say but it's all exciting. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why? ^^^
Do you genuinely think in 50 years we won't look back and be astounded we accepted 100s of thousands of people a year died in car crashes?
Driverless cars are coming, the same way people who thought horse drawn carts weren't going anywhere, piloted cars will die a death
I've no doubt its will be the norm one day. Just don't believe its around the corner. To many pitfalls and glitches at the moment has shown in the video I posted.Even in the US where the infrastructure is more car friendly. Our roads are miles away. Towns have been doing away with car space and we have many more other road users randomly crossing our paths.
Am all for new technology, have a fully electric car I bought 4 years ago before the public hullabaloo started.
Just think self drive are a while away. But agree they will make roads safer, eventually. "
AI is now the normal in so many aspects of life. Why would it suddenly hit a massive pause with cars ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why? ^^^
Do you genuinely think in 50 years we won't look back and be astounded we accepted 100s of thousands of people a year died in car crashes?
Driverless cars are coming, the same way people who thought horse drawn carts weren't going anywhere, piloted cars will die a death
I've no doubt its will be the norm one day. Just don't believe its around the corner. To many pitfalls and glitches at the moment has shown in the video I posted.Even in the US where the infrastructure is more car friendly. Our roads are miles away. Towns have been doing away with car space and we have many more other road users randomly crossing our paths.
Am all for new technology, have a fully electric car I bought 4 years ago before the public hullabaloo started.
Just think self drive are a while away. But agree they will make roads safer, eventually.
AI is now the normal in so many aspects of life. Why would it suddenly hit a massive pause with cars ?"
A lot of the AI that's normal in our lives isn't quite as intelligent as they like to make it out to be. Granted, a lot of it is less life/death than cars, but the AI at the self serve checkouts is awful. No, there's no "unexpected item" in my bagging area, you just can't detect the sodding birthday card that I just scanned and placed IN the bagging area!! And ChatGPT really isn't anywhere near as exciting as everyone makes it out to be. For the average student who is trying to avoid doing any work and who doesn't know what the right output looks like, it mainly generates generic/superficial guff that doesn't even get half marks.
Hopefully self driving cars will be better at driving than ChatGPT is at writing laboratory reports |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aretobareCouple
over a year ago
Central Portugal |
"We have a Tesla and must admit that after experiencing the simplicity, vastly reduced fuel costs (Ours runs off our solar 90% of the time), reliability and ease to drive they do make ICE cars look so backwards. The fact it has far more features now than when we bought it is also a bonus. We still don't trust the autopilot more due to the width of the cars and the narrowness of Portuguese roads.
Our plan is to do exactly this, solar panels, batteries and an electric car, more than likely a Tesla, because of they’re enormous technological advances of the rest of the market.
Have you worked out how much each mile costs? I have heard quotes of 3/4p per mile.
Afraid we are in KM over here and as we have quite a few factors that confuse the issue - like euros, the cost of our solar system (2x the car), beautiful and empty roads and no speed cameras in our area it does depend how you drive. We work out at about 1 or 2 cents a km but not when we are going fast! You guys will have to come and see.
Hades
"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ames-77Man
over a year ago
milton keynes |
End of the day the whole point of this is right now you can get in your diesel petrol car drive wherever you want whenever you want .. draw money out of the cash machine and your away .. when it's all digital and electronic they'll decide when you can drive your car and when you can use your electric card .. that's where we're heading |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aretobareCouple
over a year ago
Central Portugal |
"End of the day the whole point of this is right now you can get in your diesel petrol car drive wherever you want whenever you want .. draw money out of the cash machine and your away .. when it's all digital and electronic they'll decide when you can drive your car and when you can use your electric card .. that's where we're heading "
You can plug your car in wherever you want - a lot more accessible than a volatile fuel dump and we all saw how easy that was during the fuel shortages. So they are going to trace every car that is plugged in are they? The government can't even organise a piss up - I think that too much time on your hands and a conspiracy theory attitude does make one look a little odd. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ames-77Man
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"End of the day the whole point of this is right now you can get in your diesel petrol car drive wherever you want whenever you want .. draw money out of the cash machine and your away .. when it's all digital and electronic they'll decide when you can drive your car and when you can use your electric card .. that's where we're heading
You can plug your car in wherever you want - a lot more accessible than a volatile fuel dump and we all saw how easy that was during the fuel shortages. So they are going to trace every car that is plugged in are they? The government can't even organise a piss up - I think that too much time on your hands and a conspiracy theory attitude does make one look a little odd."
Think you missed the point .. electric cars can be shut down and disabled if there was to be a repeat of the lock downs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"We have a Tesla and must admit that after experiencing the simplicity, vastly reduced fuel costs (Ours runs off our solar 90% of the time), reliability and ease to drive they do make ICE cars look so backwards. The fact it has far more features now than when we bought it is also a bonus. We still don't trust the autopilot more due to the width of the cars and the narrowness of Portuguese roads.
Our plan is to do exactly this, solar panels, batteries and an electric car, more than likely a Tesla, because of they’re enormous technological advances of the rest of the market.
Have you worked out how much each mile costs? I have heard quotes of 3/4p per mile.
Afraid we are in KM over here and as we have quite a few factors that confuse the issue - like euros, the cost of our solar system (2x the car), beautiful and empty roads and no speed cameras in our area it does depend how you drive. We work out at about 1 or 2 cents a km but not when we are going fast! You guys will have to come and see.
"
That’s not a bad fuel cost! We are planning on campervaning at some point so we will have to look you up. It sounds like a beautiful place to live and a great life you have there. It’s minus 3 here right now, so we need need some warm weather in our life
Hades
x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
