 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Prompted by an earlier message about body mass percentages Vs penis size.
I've decided to approximate peniseses mathematically.
Assuming a blood filled vessel that's modelled as a simple cylinder, it's volume (p.radius².length) can be calculated.
Let's assume an above average 10 inch product equating to 25.4cm in length with a 7.5 inch girth (19cm) circumference (slightly smaller than a can of ) equating to a 3cm radius. We estimate the volume to be around 720cm³. It's mass translates directly to a 0.7kg product.
This represents (roughly) 1% of the body mass of a 70kg (11 stone) adult. I say roughly because the redistribution of blood would have an effect.
Congolese men average 7.1 inches (controversial). With a more reasonable 4.6 inch girth equates to a product that's slightly under 0.2kg
I hope this has been informative.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
For a long time I have been of the opinion that the fairest way to measure cocks is by volume and the obvious 'Eureka' method would be by displacement of water in a suitable measuring vessel.
The gymnastics involved have kept me from bothering but don't think it hasn't crossed my mind! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"For a long time I have been of the opinion that the fairest way to measure cocks is by volume and the obvious 'Eureka' method would be by displacement of water in a suitable measuring vessel.
The gymnastics involved have kept me from bothering but don't think it hasn't crossed my mind!"
I think the displacement method is going to be closer to the real world experience that we get, when we get to feel it inside of us |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I hate that this is the first question that popped into my head, but where did you get the density?"
You're absolutely correct in asking this question. The average density of blood is 0.994?g/mL ± 0.032?g. I made the assumption that this was close enough to water.
I appreciate the model is lacking, there's approximations throughout. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I hate that this is the first question that popped into my head, but where did you get the density?
You're absolutely correct in asking this question. The average density of blood is 0.994?g/mL ± 0.032?g. I made the assumption that this was close enough to water.
I appreciate the model is lacking, there's approximations throughout."
"You'll always find me in the kitchen at parties..."
(Only joking, OP. Impressive effort!) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I hate that this is the first question that popped into my head, but where did you get the density?
You're absolutely correct in asking this question. The average density of blood is 0.994?g/mL ± 0.032?g. I made the assumption that this was close enough to water.
I appreciate the model is lacking, there's approximations throughout."
Yeah, I assumed. So, you're approximating a penis with a cylindrical test tube of blood. To improve the model, I'd look into the percentage of a penis that is skin and tissue because I doubt it's mostly blood. That should give a better estimate of density. The cylinder approximation for volume is probably alright though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"For a long time I have been of the opinion that the fairest way to measure cocks is by volume and the obvious 'Eureka' method would be by displacement of water in a suitable measuring vessel.
The gymnastics involved have kept me from bothering but don't think it hasn't crossed my mind!
I think the displacement method is going to be closer to the real world experience that we get, when we get to feel it inside of us "
I'm mindful of the fact that it is the OP's thread and that his interest is in
mass rather than volume. Not that the two aren't related.
However, I'm rather partial to the phrase 'Massive hard on', so in that context mass could be more important than volume. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"  Now this is a fascinating topic. So much better than "what size dick do women want?".
Is there a reason you did a comparison with Congolese men? "
Published materials on the size of one's penis almost unanimously conclude that Congolese men are top of god's blessings. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oodmessMan
over a year ago
yumsville |
"For a long time I have been of the opinion that the fairest way to measure cocks is by volume and the obvious 'Eureka' method would be by displacement of water in a suitable measuring vessel.
The gymnastics involved have kept me from bothering but don't think it hasn't crossed my mind!
I think the displacement method is going to be closer to the real world experience that we get, when we get to feel it inside of us "
To add another x/y x (z)/r... my cock seems to float in the bath, I can't remember it sinking anyway |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" Now this is a fascinating topic. So much better than "what size dick do women want?".
Is there a reason you did a comparison with Congolese men?
Published materials on the size of one's penis almost unanimously conclude that Congolese men are top of god's blessings."
What a delicious way to describe it. Thank you. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
