FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > If I had a water fight with my daughter
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""The Met said it was called to a report of a gun in the street and was obliged under policy to treat all firearms as dangerous until proven otherwise." Surely they were following procedure? Someone made a report they attended, yes maybe a bit ott but if a report has been made until they can prove it's not real they have to consider the safety that a potential gun was pointed at a girl and took measures to prevent someone potentially getting harmed. Im unsure how it's race related they responded to a report of a minor with a firearm. Mrs " An officer saw a 13 year old playing with a BLUE water pistol and called for armed police? They called his mum aggressive but it was her intervention that got him ‘de arrested’. The trauma from incidents like this, that impacts Black CHILDREN more than anyone else when we have mental health services that aren’t trained to deal with racial trauma is ridiculous. Black boys and girls aren’t ever just children. Part of the racism that we face is that we are men and women from the moment we’re walking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. " These kinds of mistakes? We’re talking about a 13 year old that was moments away from dying because a police officer couldn’t tell that a blue water gun was clearly a blue water gun. God Bless Tamir Rice who died in America because of this ‘human error’. Tamir Rice would be 21 if he wasn’t shot by a police officer almost exactly 9 years ago. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""The Met said it was called to a report of a gun in the street and was obliged under policy to treat all firearms as dangerous until proven otherwise." Surely they were following procedure? Someone made a report they attended, yes maybe a bit ott but if a report has been made until they can prove it's not real they have to consider the safety that a potential gun was pointed at a girl and took measures to prevent someone potentially getting harmed. Im unsure how it's race related they responded to a report of a minor with a firearm. Mrs An officer saw a 13 year old playing with a BLUE water pistol and called for armed police? They called his mum aggressive but it was her intervention that got him ‘de arrested’. The trauma from incidents like this, that impacts Black CHILDREN more than anyone else when we have mental health services that aren’t trained to deal with racial trauma is ridiculous. Black boys and girls aren’t ever just children. Part of the racism that we face is that we are men and women from the moment we’re walking. " To play devil's advocate here. What if there had been a real gun and a shooting I know this is hypothetical but someone had been injured or worse and the police not reacted in the first place, would you also be claiming the same? Im not saying their reaction was appropriate btw. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. These kinds of mistakes? We’re talking about a 13 year old that was moments away from dying because a police officer couldn’t tell that a blue water gun was clearly a blue water gun. God Bless Tamir Rice who died in America because of this ‘human error’. Tamir Rice would be 21 if he wasn’t shot by a police officer almost exactly 9 years ago. " If black males weren't vastly over-represented in violent crime these things wouldn't happen. Every race case reported by the media turns out to be a pack of lies and distortion. Now take your politics somewhere else. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""The Met said it was called to a report of a gun in the street and was obliged under policy to treat all firearms as dangerous until proven otherwise." Surely they were following procedure? Someone made a report they attended, yes maybe a bit ott but if a report has been made until they can prove it's not real they have to consider the safety that a potential gun was pointed at a girl and took measures to prevent someone potentially getting harmed. Im unsure how it's race related they responded to a report of a minor with a firearm. Mrs An officer saw a 13 year old playing with a BLUE water pistol and called for armed police? They called his mum aggressive but it was her intervention that got him ‘de arrested’. The trauma from incidents like this, that impacts Black CHILDREN more than anyone else when we have mental health services that aren’t trained to deal with racial trauma is ridiculous. Black boys and girls aren’t ever just children. Part of the racism that we face is that we are men and women from the moment we’re walking. " He obviously wasn't sure it was a "blue water pistol" or he wouldn't have called in for a fire arms response. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. " Totally with you, had it been real and they'd not responded it would be a different story. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. These kinds of mistakes? We’re talking about a 13 year old that was moments away from dying because a police officer couldn’t tell that a blue water gun was clearly a blue water gun. God Bless Tamir Rice who died in America because of this ‘human error’. Tamir Rice would be 21 if he wasn’t shot by a police officer almost exactly 9 years ago. " This is obviously a sensitive subject, and the fact is that we don't know everything about what happened, just what's been reported in the press...... Air pistols and BB guns that fire steel balls are all brightly coloured so they aren't mistaken as replica firearms. They can be modified to increase their power enough to push a steel pellet through a breeze block from 10 ft away. It's why the emergency services are twined to treat all items that look like firearms, as firearms until proven otherwise. There might be all sorts of other issues in play, but that aspect is totally 1/0. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm gonna go with yes depending on where you live. Sorry dude. " It’s shit man. It’s so fucking shit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So you’d rather they didn’t investigate potential firearms offences? What that’s saying is a potential real firearm could be painted to look harmless, and you won’t get stopped because it’s ’clearly A toy’ An unlikely scenario, yes. But we live in a fucked up world where I guess anything is possible. " Let’s talk about what happened here rather than talking about things that didn’t. ‘The boy had been playing near his home with a blue plastic water pistol with his sister, who had a pink one.’ Officer called that in for armed police. Armed police arrested him. Pointed guns at him. He was 13. I don’t think people grasp how young 13 is. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. Totally with you, had it been real and they'd not responded it would be a different story. Mrs " But it was a blue and pink water gun. so let’s focus on what actually happened | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. These kinds of mistakes? We’re talking about a 13 year old that was moments away from dying because a police officer couldn’t tell that a blue water gun was clearly a blue water gun. God Bless Tamir Rice who died in America because of this ‘human error’. Tamir Rice would be 21 if he wasn’t shot by a police officer almost exactly 9 years ago. If black males weren't vastly over-represented in violent crime these things wouldn't happen. Every race case reported by the media turns out to be a pack of lies and distortion. Now take your politics somewhere else. " They’re children. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. Totally with you, had it been real and they'd not responded it would be a different story. Mrs But it was a blue and pink water gun. so let’s focus on what actually happened" And until they got close enough to identify it wasn't dangerous they don't know that, guns these days aren't all black/silver. They responded to a potential fire arms incident with a person potentially in danger, they did the right thing. I'm sorry I don't agree with you here pickles. They would have responsibility to any potential fire arms call regardless of ethnicity & if they didn't respond at all then that's an issue. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. Totally with you, had it been real and they'd not responded it would be a different story. Mrs But it was a blue and pink water gun. so let’s focus on what actually happened And until they got close enough to identify it wasn't dangerous they don't know that, guns these days aren't all black/silver. They responded to a potential fire arms incident with a person potentially in danger, they did the right thing. I'm sorry I don't agree with you here pickles. They would have responsibility to any potential fire arms call regardless of ethnicity & if they didn't respond at all then that's an issue. Mrs " Why are they called? Why is the officer making that call about a 13 year old without even an inkling that they’re having a water fight. 30 seconds it takes to recognise that kids are playing with water and not bullets. Literally 30 seconds. Like I said. Black kids don’t get to be kids. And if you know, you know. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Side note: calling his mum aggressive? Lol they ain’t even trying" If that had been my 13 year old son I would have been aggressive too. Thank god she was | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. These kinds of mistakes? We’re talking about a 13 year old that was moments away from dying because a police officer couldn’t tell that a blue water gun was clearly a blue water gun. God Bless Tamir Rice who died in America because of this ‘human error’. Tamir Rice would be 21 if he wasn’t shot by a police officer almost exactly 9 years ago. " I read it as the boy was playing with a blue gun. Didn't say when it became apparent that it was. Members of the public didn't realise it was a toy before phoning the police so I can only presume it's wasn't all that obvious until after the event. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would you call the police if you saw these kids playing? And at what point would you stand there and realise that you’ve made a mistake and it’s kids playing before the armed police arrive and point guns at a kid? " See I agree with you there, they surely should have realised and phoned them again? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Side note: calling his mum aggressive? Lol they ain’t even trying If that had been my 13 year old son I would have been aggressive too. Thank god she was" Me too! I’d have probably ended up being arrested! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. Totally with you, had it been real and they'd not responded it would be a different story. Mrs But it was a blue and pink water gun. so let’s focus on what actually happened And until they got close enough to identify it wasn't dangerous they don't know that, guns these days aren't all black/silver. They responded to a potential fire arms incident with a person potentially in danger, they did the right thing. I'm sorry I don't agree with you here pickles. They would have responsibility to any potential fire arms call regardless of ethnicity & if they didn't respond at all then that's an issue. Mrs Why are they called? Why is the officer making that call about a 13 year old without even an inkling that they’re having a water fight. 30 seconds it takes to recognise that kids are playing with water and not bullets. Literally 30 seconds. Like I said. Black kids don’t get to be kids. And if you know, you know. " You have made your mind up, the officer obviously wouldn't have called if he knew it was a water pistol would be, he'd look a twat to start with. I've nothing more to add you have your mind made up. Police responded to a fire arms report they most certainly should attend. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. " People are able to disagree with you, without being racist. Yes I'd be heartbroken if this happened to my son who is the same age. But I also understand that human error occurs. I'm not a fan of toy guns in any shape or form. Being a victim of gun crime kinda does that to someone. And just so you know the perpetrators were white in both instances. So if anything my bias (I'm aware of it and I'm working on it) is towards white males. Sweeping generalisations never helped either side. If anything it makes things worse. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. " Naturally Black children are big scary adults who make the Big Wesponsible Powice (who stand between us and civilisation collapsing) cower in their big manly boots. White people didn't know what they were doing, were so young (into their 40s) and/ or were mentally ill and therefore are never responsible for anything. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. " And this..... What's the point even replying it's only a valid reply if we agree with you. Otherwise what are we all racist?! Ridiculous. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. People are able to disagree with you, without being racist. Yes I'd be heartbroken if this happened to my son who is the same age. But I also understand that human error occurs. I'm not a fan of toy guns in any shape or form. Being a victim of gun crime kinda does that to someone. And just so you know the perpetrators were white in both instances. So if anything my bias (I'm aware of it and I'm working on it) is towards white males. Sweeping generalisations never helped either side. If anything it makes things worse. " I’ve not called you or anyone in this thread a racist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would armed police come and arrest me? https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/19/met-rammed-boy-13-playing-with-water-pistol-off-bike-and-pointed-guns-at-him What’s going on here guys? Is it racism? " No, it's protecting the public from potential harm. The pistol could easily have been filled with another substance that could cause harm! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. And this..... What's the point even replying it's only a valid reply if we agree with you. Otherwise what are we all racist?! Ridiculous. Mrs " Then don’t reply. You have your opinion. We disagree. That’s it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. Naturally Black children are big scary adults who make the Big Wesponsible Powice (who stand between us and civilisation collapsing) cower in their big manly boots. White people didn't know what they were doing, were so young (into their 40s) and/ or were mentally ill and therefore are never responsible for anything." Lol the making Black children adults sooner than they are is something that really gets me. The thought of having a son being treated and handled like a criminal man makes me Vom a bit. I do know that the idea that Black children are scary to white adults is something that has consistently ended up in Black people being brutalised and murdered. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. And this..... What's the point even replying it's only a valid reply if we agree with you. Otherwise what are we all racist?! Ridiculous. Mrs Then don’t reply. You have your opinion. We disagree. That’s it?" Is this not what forums are for, to give an opinion? You asked a question I answered. Have a lovely rest of the day. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. Naturally Black children are big scary adults who make the Big Wesponsible Powice (who stand between us and civilisation collapsing) cower in their big manly boots. White people didn't know what they were doing, were so young (into their 40s) and/ or were mentally ill and therefore are never responsible for anything. Lol the making Black children adults sooner than they are is something that really gets me. The thought of having a son being treated and handled like a criminal man makes me Vom a bit. I do know that the idea that Black children are scary to white adults is something that has consistently ended up in Black people being brutalised and murdered. " I'm so angry on your behalf, that people would rather continue with the system as it is because it's not them and theirs who are being brutalised. This is justified because someone's got to suffer for my sense of security. If the shoe was on the other foot white people would have the biggest fucking shit fit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It legitimises the myth, when it is not acknowledged and outed. It is excused: well statistically... No that doesn't make this shit right at all. But it's like trying to cover a wall with snowballs. Trying to get people to acknowledge their implicit bias. I'll answer you straight. Is it racism - yes Well we thought that... Well you thought wrong. Why did you get it wrong? You just traumatised a fucking kid with a water pistol." For me it’s the trauma inflicted on a kid being a kid. Playing with his sister near his house. He recalls seeing the red lasers pointing at him. And then there’s the layer of, this always happens to us. And our children. All my life I’ve had to consider how my mere existence makes others feel safe/unsafe. And my interactions with the police from when I was a teenager haven’t changed that. Only solidified what this boy found out so soon. That he’s a threat. His attempt to experience childhood result in trauma. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. And this..... What's the point even replying it's only a valid reply if we agree with you. Otherwise what are we all racist?! Ridiculous. Mrs Then don’t reply. You have your opinion. We disagree. That’s it? Is this not what forums are for, to give an opinion? You asked a question I answered. Have a lovely rest of the day. Mrs" You’re welcome to reply though. I’m not stopping you? Just because we disagree doesn’t mean you can’t have your opinion? Or post it? I’m confused where I’ve implied you can’t? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It legitimises the myth, when it is not acknowledged and outed. It is excused: well statistically... No that doesn't make this shit right at all. But it's like trying to cover a wall with snowballs. Trying to get people to acknowledge their implicit bias. I'll answer you straight. Is it racism - yes Well we thought that... Well you thought wrong. Why did you get it wrong? You just traumatised a fucking kid with a water pistol. For me it’s the trauma inflicted on a kid being a kid. Playing with his sister near his house. He recalls seeing the red lasers pointing at him. And then there’s the layer of, this always happens to us. And our children. All my life I’ve had to consider how my mere existence makes others feel safe/unsafe. And my interactions with the police from when I was a teenager haven’t changed that. Only solidified what this boy found out so soon. That he’s a threat. His attempt to experience childhood result in trauma. " Rather than dealing with their own shit, people (mostly adults) would rather inflict it upon Black children. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. And this..... What's the point even replying it's only a valid reply if we agree with you. Otherwise what are we all racist?! Ridiculous. Mrs Then don’t reply. You have your opinion. We disagree. That’s it? Is this not what forums are for, to give an opinion? You asked a question I answered. Have a lovely rest of the day. Mrs You’re welcome to reply though. I’m not stopping you? Just because we disagree doesn’t mean you can’t have your opinion? Or post it? I’m confused where I’ve implied you can’t? " Maybe it's my misunderstanding in your replies, it's tricky to read tone via text (well it is for me anyway) Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. And this..... What's the point even replying it's only a valid reply if we agree with you. Otherwise what are we all racist?! Ridiculous. Mrs Then don’t reply. You have your opinion. We disagree. That’s it? Is this not what forums are for, to give an opinion? You asked a question I answered. Have a lovely rest of the day. Mrs You’re welcome to reply though. I’m not stopping you? Just because we disagree doesn’t mean you can’t have your opinion? Or post it? I’m confused where I’ve implied you can’t? Maybe it's my misunderstanding in your replies, it's tricky to read tone via text (well it is for me anyway) Mrs " I welcome opinions. And I’ll engage with sine and I won’t engage with others. And I’m sure others will come along and engage. I hope so anyway. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's hard for me to stay civil on this issue pickle. I admire you for it. It's still too raw for me seeing the impact it's had on my daughters. Sweep that shit under the carpet and carry on. Nothing to see here folks. Watch TV. Oh look a report about a stabbing it's a black kid - probably in a gang and a drug dealer- no respect for the law. Says here he was on his way home from work and... That's nice dear look there's a show where celebrities dress as bears and sing songs - let's get a pizza." Hans You really get it man. Thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's hard for me to stay civil on this issue pickle. I admire you for it. It's still too raw for me seeing the impact it's had on my daughters. Sweep that shit under the carpet and carry on. Nothing to see here folks. Watch TV. Oh look a report about a stabbing it's a black kid - probably in a gang and a drug dealer- no respect for the law. Says here he was on his way home from work and... That's nice dear look there's a show where celebrities dress as bears and sing songs - let's get a pizza." I'm sorry | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would you call the police if you saw these kids playing? And at what point would you stand there and realise that you’ve made a mistake and it’s kids playing before the armed police arrive and point guns at a kid? " White kids playing with water pistols? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do know that the idea that Black children are scary to white adults is something that has consistently ended up in Black people being brutalised and murdered. " Sadly the truth! Starting with the person(s) who called it in - watch barely pubescent children play but see potential murder, how does that happen? Blinded by racial bias maybe? I don't understand how people can deny it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Side note: calling his mum aggressive? Lol they ain’t even trying If that had been my 13 year old son I would have been aggressive too. Thank god she was" I have to agree here. I have a 13yr old son. He is bigger than me already but he is a child still. A kid! Just a young kid. If he had guns pointed at him and police were trying to arrest him for PLAYING, I would no doubt be arrested myself for the way I would react. MrsAbz | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's hard for me to stay civil on this issue pickle. I admire you for it. It's still too raw for me seeing the impact it's had on my daughters. Sweep that shit under the carpet and carry on. Nothing to see here folks. Watch TV. Oh look a report about a stabbing it's a black kid - probably in a gang and a drug dealer- no respect for the law. Says here he was on his way home from work and... That's nice dear look there's a show where celebrities dress as bears and sing songs - let's get a pizza. Hans You really get it man. Thank you" Pickle, thank you. My daughters need people like you out there. I used to deliver E&D training, not the corporate tick box shit. The personal development stuff. I wish I could do more, I'm still a little too broken. I'm working on it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's not a black or white thing it's us living in a dangerous world, when I lived in West Ham years ago there would be kids with real guns shooting each other and 30 years later its even worse. Kim was doing a course in London and we were staying in Euston and you had black people shooting other black people at a funeral, I'm not saying white people don't shoot each other just that police have an hard job distinguishing what weapons are real. Guns knives stun guns crossbows pepper spray are popular among teenagers and older gangs so where do the police draw the line in enforcement to stop attempted crimes." I think the point is though if it was white kids playing with colourful water pistols, would anyone have reported it? Would they have even noticed? Maybe, I am not seeing the full picture here? To me it seems simple that black kids = must be doing something bad. That is the problem here. Someone please correct me if I am wrong in my perception MrsAbz | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would armed police come and arrest me? https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/19/met-rammed-boy-13-playing-with-water-pistol-off-bike-and-pointed-guns-at-him What’s going on here guys? Is it racism? " No. Maybe we would rather police don't respond when someone reports seeing guns.? The wild west. But more agenda led click bait. Don't get sucked into it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""The Met said it was called to a report of a gun in the street and was obliged under policy to treat all firearms as dangerous until proven otherwise." Surely they were following procedure? Someone made a report they attended, yes maybe a bit ott but if a report has been made until they can prove it's not real they have to consider the safety that a potential gun was pointed at a girl and took measures to prevent someone potentially getting harmed. Im unsure how it's race related they responded to a report of a minor with a firearm. Mrs An officer saw a 13 year old playing with a BLUE water pistol and called for armed police? They called his mum aggressive but it was her intervention that got him ‘de arrested’. The trauma from incidents like this, that impacts Black CHILDREN more than anyone else when we have mental health services that aren’t trained to deal with racial trauma is ridiculous. Black boys and girls aren’t ever just children. Part of the racism that we face is that we are men and women from the moment we’re walking. " Agenda led click bait. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would armed police come and arrest me? https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/19/met-rammed-boy-13-playing-with-water-pistol-off-bike-and-pointed-guns-at-him What’s going on here guys? Is it racism? No. Maybe we would rather police don't respond when someone reports seeing guns.? The wild west. But more agenda led click bait. Don't get sucked into it. " Are you against the agenda of children not being brutalised? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. Naturally Black children are big scary adults who make the Big Wesponsible Powice (who stand between us and civilisation collapsing) cower in their big manly boots. White people didn't know what they were doing, were so young (into their 40s) and/ or were mentally ill and therefore are never responsible for anything." Actually though you jest, my Dad was that white man you described albeit he was in his 30's. Yeah having loaded guns pointed at you is fucking terrifying. What did the police do confiscate his guns for a while. Make jokes all you like gun crime is not funny regardless of who the culprit is. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. Naturally Black children are big scary adults who make the Big Wesponsible Powice (who stand between us and civilisation collapsing) cower in their big manly boots. White people didn't know what they were doing, were so young (into their 40s) and/ or were mentally ill and therefore are never responsible for anything. Actually though you jest, my Dad was that white man you described albeit he was in his 30's. Yeah having loaded guns pointed at you is fucking terrifying. What did the police do confiscate his guns for a while. Make jokes all you like gun crime is not funny regardless of who the culprit is. " Yes, the point I'm making is that crime is hilarious. So funny. Maybe the point I'm making is that Black people are made out to be responsible disproportionately to white people in public discourse, and that's fucking ridiculous, and we as white people should stop allowing ourselves to be infantalised and given cookies for not being total shitstains because it's vaguely convenient (and we don't think that the power will ever be turned against us)? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. Totally with you, had it been real and they'd not responded it would be a different story. Mrs But it was a blue and pink water gun. so let’s focus on what actually happened" A blue and pink water gun that is modelled on the Glock 17 which is the most commonly carried pistol by global law enforcement agencies including the UK. It’s colour is irrelevant as they can actually be purchased in any colour you like, although not legally in the UK. So putting aside your ignorance about firearms you can easily find that gangs frequently use teenagers to do their dirty work, providing the guns to do so. The youngest assailant I ever dealt with, who beat an elderly woman half to death with an iron bar, was eleven. So a teenager pulling a trigger with no idea of the consequences, is nothing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. Naturally Black children are big scary adults who make the Big Wesponsible Powice (who stand between us and civilisation collapsing) cower in their big manly boots. White people didn't know what they were doing, were so young (into their 40s) and/ or were mentally ill and therefore are never responsible for anything. Actually though you jest, my Dad was that white man you described albeit he was in his 30's. Yeah having loaded guns pointed at you is fucking terrifying. What did the police do confiscate his guns for a while. Make jokes all you like gun crime is not funny regardless of who the culprit is. Yes, the point I'm making is that crime is hilarious. So funny. Maybe the point I'm making is that Black people are made out to be responsible disproportionately to white people in public discourse, and that's fucking ridiculous, and we as white people should stop allowing ourselves to be infantalised and given cookies for not being total shitstains because it's vaguely convenient (and we don't think that the power will ever be turned against us)?" Don't carry a gun... Don't get knicked.? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. Naturally Black children are big scary adults who make the Big Wesponsible Powice (who stand between us and civilisation collapsing) cower in their big manly boots. White people didn't know what they were doing, were so young (into their 40s) and/ or were mentally ill and therefore are never responsible for anything. Actually though you jest, my Dad was that white man you described albeit he was in his 30's. Yeah having loaded guns pointed at you is fucking terrifying. What did the police do confiscate his guns for a while. Make jokes all you like gun crime is not funny regardless of who the culprit is. Yes, the point I'm making is that crime is hilarious. So funny. Maybe the point I'm making is that Black people are made out to be responsible disproportionately to white people in public discourse, and that's fucking ridiculous, and we as white people should stop allowing ourselves to be infantalised and given cookies for not being total shitstains because it's vaguely convenient (and we don't think that the power will ever be turned against us)? Don't carry a gun... Don't get knicked.?" Don't play with a toy with your siblings if you don't want to be brutalised by the police. Is that the message you're ok with sending to children? Or only black children? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I was a dr*g dealer carrying a real weapon, I would paint it blue or pink so a police officer bullied or fooled into thinking it was a toy wouldn't stand a chance in those few seconds of indecision before they took action. Bess" Maybe the police should exercise some personal responsibility rather than the effects of their mistakes being thrust onto children. Funny how personal responsibility only goes one way. That boy. Was black. In public. With something that looks like something that can't be obtained legally in this country. What are the poor innocent powerless powicepoos to do? Won't somebody not think of the children? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I was a dr*g dealer carrying a real weapon, I would paint it blue or pink so a police officer bullied or fooled into thinking it was a toy wouldn't stand a chance in those few seconds of indecision before they took action. Bess" And this is exactly what they do. It started in the US (of course), but criminals often paint their guns to resemble what are perceived as toy colours so they can fling it and claim it was a toy or to make responding police hesitate....so they can get the first shot in. It's a shitty world we are now living in. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I was a dr*g dealer carrying a real weapon, I would paint it blue or pink so a police officer bullied or fooled into thinking it was a toy wouldn't stand a chance in those few seconds of indecision before they took action. Bess And this is exactly what they do. It started in the US (of course), but criminals often paint their guns to resemble what are perceived as toy colours so they can fling it and claim it was a toy or to make responding police hesitate....so they can get the first shot in. It's a shitty world we are now living in." Yup. A shitty world where otherwise good people justify traumatising children. Someone up thread mentioned the wild west. If the media depictions are correct (which I'm sure they are not), I'd actually prefer it. At least there was some semblance of honour and decency, rather than cowering to and justifying power. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I was a dr*g dealer carrying a real weapon, I would paint it blue or pink so a police officer bullied or fooled into thinking it was a toy wouldn't stand a chance in those few seconds of indecision before they took action. Bess Maybe the police should exercise some personal responsibility rather than the effects of their mistakes being thrust onto children. Funny how personal responsibility only goes one way. That boy. Was black. In public. With something that looks like something that can't be obtained legally in this country. What are the poor innocent powerless powicepoos to do? Won't somebody not think of the children?" The police should do their job and protect the public, which they did in this case. Police officers can be parents too. Bess | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would armed police come and arrest me? https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/19/met-rammed-boy-13-playing-with-water-pistol-off-bike-and-pointed-guns-at-him What’s going on here guys? Is it racism? No, it's protecting the public from potential harm. The pistol could easily have been filled with another substance that could cause harm!" By that logic, armed police should be called to every single child who is playing with a water pistol as it "could easily have been filled with another substance that could cause harm". They should be called for every child that is playing with a plastic toy sword because "it could easily have been modified to cause harm". They should be called for every child that is playing with a football because "it could easily have been modified into a bomb". The fact here is that the child committed the crime of "being black and playing in an area with white people present" and was automatically assumed to be a probable danger to the white people. Would this have happened with a white child playing in an area with black people present? With the police being called by a black person? Would armed police come to point guns at a white child? Almost certainly not. In fact the black person making the complaint would probably be charged with wasting police time. Yes this incident was racism, institutionalised racism going all the way from the person that reported the incident through to the members of the firearms squad that assaulted a child. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I was a dr*g dealer carrying a real weapon, I would paint it blue or pink so a police officer bullied or fooled into thinking it was a toy wouldn't stand a chance in those few seconds of indecision before they took action. Bess And this is exactly what they do. It started in the US (of course), but criminals often paint their guns to resemble what are perceived as toy colours so they can fling it and claim it was a toy or to make responding police hesitate....so they can get the first shot in. It's a shitty world we are now living in." Sadly, some people are too thick to realise just how shitty some people can be. Many of these people take illegal or prescription dr*gs which can confuse their powers of rationalisation. Bess | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I was a dr*g dealer carrying a real weapon, I would paint it blue or pink so a police officer bullied or fooled into thinking it was a toy wouldn't stand a chance in those few seconds of indecision before they took action. Bess Maybe the police should exercise some personal responsibility rather than the effects of their mistakes being thrust onto children. Funny how personal responsibility only goes one way. That boy. Was black. In public. With something that looks like something that can't be obtained legally in this country. What are the poor innocent powerless powicepoos to do? Won't somebody not think of the children? The police should do their job and protect the public, which they did in this case. Police officers can be parents too. Bess" Then maybe they should have had some empathy for the child they traumatised and used their adult resources rather than reacting poorly. They have the power in the situation. How many children is it worth traumatising to keep people safe? How many white children is it worth traumatising to keep people safe? Are people safe if children are at risk of being traumatised? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I was a dr*g dealer carrying a real weapon, I would paint it blue or pink so a police officer bullied or fooled into thinking it was a toy wouldn't stand a chance in those few seconds of indecision before they took action. Bess Maybe the police should exercise some personal responsibility rather than the effects of their mistakes being thrust onto children. Funny how personal responsibility only goes one way. That boy. Was black. In public. With something that looks like something that can't be obtained legally in this country. What are the poor innocent powerless powicepoos to do? Won't somebody not think of the children? The police should do their job and protect the public, which they did in this case. Police officers can be parents too. Bess Then maybe they should have had some empathy for the child they traumatised and used their adult resources rather than reacting poorly. They have the power in the situation. How many children is it worth traumatising to keep people safe? How many white children is it worth traumatising to keep people safe? Are people safe if children are at risk of being traumatised? " Ah, I can see you're trying the old race-baiting tactics again. I'll leave you to it. Bess | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I was a dr*g dealer carrying a real weapon, I would paint it blue or pink so a police officer bullied or fooled into thinking it was a toy wouldn't stand a chance in those few seconds of indecision before they took action. Bess Maybe the police should exercise some personal responsibility rather than the effects of their mistakes being thrust onto children. Funny how personal responsibility only goes one way. That boy. Was black. In public. With something that looks like something that can't be obtained legally in this country. What are the poor innocent powerless powicepoos to do? Won't somebody not think of the children? The police should do their job and protect the public, which they did in this case. Police officers can be parents too. Bess Then maybe they should have had some empathy for the child they traumatised and used their adult resources rather than reacting poorly. They have the power in the situation. How many children is it worth traumatising to keep people safe? How many white children is it worth traumatising to keep people safe? Are people safe if children are at risk of being traumatised? Ah, I can see you're trying the old race-baiting tactics again. I'll leave you to it. Bess" In a thread that's explicitly about race. Where it's framed like that from the start, because it's a known phenomenon. Maybe when it happens to more white children, something will be done about abuses of power. It seems in this country we've learned nothing and are proud of it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. Naturally Black children are big scary adults who make the Big Wesponsible Powice (who stand between us and civilisation collapsing) cower in their big manly boots. White people didn't know what they were doing, were so young (into their 40s) and/ or were mentally ill and therefore are never responsible for anything. Actually though you jest, my Dad was that white man you described albeit he was in his 30's. Yeah having loaded guns pointed at you is fucking terrifying. What did the police do confiscate his guns for a while. Make jokes all you like gun crime is not funny regardless of who the culprit is. Yes, the point I'm making is that crime is hilarious. So funny. Maybe the point I'm making is that Black people are made out to be responsible disproportionately to white people in public discourse, and that's fucking ridiculous, and we as white people should stop allowing ourselves to be infantalised and given cookies for not being total shitstains because it's vaguely convenient (and we don't think that the power will ever be turned against us)? Don't carry a gun... Don't get knicked.? Don't play with a toy with your siblings if you don't want to be brutalised by the police. Is that the message you're ok with sending to children? Or only black children?" Where do you get only black children from? I didn't say anything about colour. You did. What nutter of any colour plays with guns with their kids? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I was a dr*g dealer carrying a real weapon, I would paint it blue or pink so a police officer bullied or fooled into thinking it was a toy wouldn't stand a chance in those few seconds of indecision before they took action. Bess" If you were a drug dealer blah blah blah. You don’t look 13. You don’t look like a child. So I don’t really care for your imaginary scenario | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I was a dr*g dealer carrying a real weapon, I would paint it blue or pink so a police officer bullied or fooled into thinking it was a toy wouldn't stand a chance in those few seconds of indecision before they took action. Bess And this is exactly what they do. It started in the US (of course), but criminals often paint their guns to resemble what are perceived as toy colours so they can fling it and claim it was a toy or to make responding police hesitate....so they can get the first shot in. It's a shitty world we are now living in. Sadly, some people are too thick to realise just how shitty some people can be. Many of these people take illegal or prescription dr*gs which can confuse their powers of rationalisation. Bess" What on earth are you talking about? I hope you’re not suggesting people on this thread are using dr*gs which is confusing their ability to rationalise? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I was a dr*g dealer carrying a real weapon, I would paint it blue or pink so a police officer bullied or fooled into thinking it was a toy wouldn't stand a chance in those few seconds of indecision before they took action. Bess And this is exactly what they do. It started in the US (of course), but criminals often paint their guns to resemble what are perceived as toy colours so they can fling it and claim it was a toy or to make responding police hesitate....so they can get the first shot in. It's a shitty world we are now living in. Sadly, some people are too thick to realise just how shitty some people can be. Many of these people take illegal or prescription dr*gs which can confuse their powers of rationalisation. Bess What on earth are you talking about? I hope you’re not suggesting people on this thread are using dr*gs which is confusing their ability to rationalise? " Steve, be aware a lot of people/some will try to defend the indefensible because they know and they’re scared the ‘powers that be’ can change the narrative on a whim and it could be a whole group of other people at the authorities mercy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"[Removed by poster at 20/10/23 18:05:00]" I saw this. that was real ish. You’re so so so so right. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Frankly, Steve, I don't know why you bothered - I read this thread, and it played out exactly as I thought it would...deflect, deflect, turn it on the "perpetrator", justify it by "well, the black crime rate", "it could have been a real gun because young black boys", blah blah blah, rinse and repeat. And this is "tolerance"?? The bottom line is, the police were called on a 13 year-old boy with a blue water pistol, and his younger sister who had a pink water pistol...didn't bother to check further to see what if anything was happening, didn't stop to watch them having a water fight. He was rammed off his bike by armed police, knocked to the ground and officers pointed their submachine guns at him and he was handcuffed. He deserved that no more than I did being arrested at 12 for "stealing" my mum's coat, which she'd sent me to collect from a dry cleaners. But yeah, just add "playing while black" to the list...and before anyone wants to come at me with the usual "defending the indefensible" BS, you could save your breath, and maybe try and find somewhere inside yourselves some empathy for the situation that boy found himself in, through no fault of his own. But you won't." that was real shit man. Thank you for speaking on the things. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Frankly, Steve, I don't know why you bothered - I read this thread, and it played out exactly as I thought it would...deflect, deflect, turn it on the "perpetrator", justify it by "well, the black crime rate", "it could have been a real gun because young black boys", blah blah blah, rinse and repeat. And this is "tolerance"?? The bottom line is, the police were called on a 13 year-old boy with a blue water pistol, and his younger sister who had a pink water pistol...didn't bother to check further to see what if anything was happening, didn't stop to watch them having a water fight. He was rammed off his bike by armed police, knocked to the ground and officers pointed their submachine guns at him and he was handcuffed. He deserved that no more than I did being arrested at 12 for "stealing" my mum's coat, which she'd sent me to collect from a dry cleaners. But yeah, just add "playing while black" to the list...and before anyone wants to come at me with the usual "defending the indefensible" BS, you could save your breath, and maybe try and find somewhere inside yourselves some empathy for the situation that boy found himself in, through no fault of his own. But you won't." I always hope that someone reads the thread and it makes them pause. Steve (or anyone who puts their head above the parapet) knows for sure that some people will NEVER shift their views. But others just might. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Frankly, Steve, I don't know why you bothered - I read this thread, and it played out exactly as I thought it would...deflect, deflect, turn it on the "perpetrator", justify it by "well, the black crime rate", "it could have been a real gun because young black boys", blah blah blah, rinse and repeat. And this is "tolerance"?? The bottom line is, the police were called on a 13 year-old boy with a blue water pistol, and his younger sister who had a pink water pistol...didn't bother to check further to see what if anything was happening, didn't stop to watch them having a water fight. He was rammed off his bike by armed police, knocked to the ground and officers pointed their submachine guns at him and he was handcuffed. He deserved that no more than I did being arrested at 12 for "stealing" my mum's coat, which she'd sent me to collect from a dry cleaners. But yeah, just add "playing while black" to the list...and before anyone wants to come at me with the usual "defending the indefensible" BS, you could save your breath, and maybe try and find somewhere inside yourselves some empathy for the situation that boy found himself in, through no fault of his own. But you won't." Well said! I'm obviously not black, but what I struggle with most on threads like these is people's inability to see things from a a different perspective, wilfully or not, or to understand why that perspective may be different to theirs, shaped through the years. I guess they don't need to, safe in the knowledge they and their children are highly unlikely ever to face the same treatment, even in identical situations. But they'll also say there's no such thing as white privilege. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would armed police come and arrest me? https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/19/met-rammed-boy-13-playing-with-water-pistol-off-bike-and-pointed-guns-at-him What’s going on here guys? Is it racism? " Depends on your race, apparently. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would armed police come and arrest me? https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/19/met-rammed-boy-13-playing-with-water-pistol-off-bike-and-pointed-guns-at-him What’s going on here guys? Is it racism? Depends on your race, apparently. " The whole thing is completely mind boggling. I work in a public facing job and occasionally you just have to say, we fucked up here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. " Wha!? A pink gun?! Stop trying to defend these wankers. They were behaving badly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""The Met said it was called to a report of a gun in the street and was obliged under policy to treat all firearms as dangerous until proven otherwise." Surely they were following procedure? Someone made a report they attended, yes maybe a bit ott but if a report has been made until they can prove it's not real they have to consider the safety that a potential gun was pointed at a girl and took measures to prevent someone potentially getting harmed. Im unsure how it's race related they responded to a report of a minor with a firearm. Mrs An officer saw a 13 year old playing with a BLUE water pistol and called for armed police? They called his mum aggressive but it was her intervention that got him ‘de arrested’. The trauma from incidents like this, that impacts Black CHILDREN more than anyone else when we have mental health services that aren’t trained to deal with racial trauma is ridiculous. Black boys and girls aren’t ever just children. Part of the racism that we face is that we are men and women from the moment we’re walking. " Hang on. There was a pink one too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""The Met said it was called to a report of a gun in the street and was obliged under policy to treat all firearms as dangerous until proven otherwise." Surely they were following procedure? Someone made a report they attended, yes maybe a bit ott but if a report has been made until they can prove it's not real they have to consider the safety that a potential gun was pointed at a girl and took measures to prevent someone potentially getting harmed. Im unsure how it's race related they responded to a report of a minor with a firearm. Mrs An officer saw a 13 year old playing with a BLUE water pistol and called for armed police? They called his mum aggressive but it was her intervention that got him ‘de arrested’. The trauma from incidents like this, that impacts Black CHILDREN more than anyone else when we have mental health services that aren’t trained to deal with racial trauma is ridiculous. Black boys and girls aren’t ever just children. Part of the racism that we face is that we are men and women from the moment we’re walking. " your missing the point it was reported to the police that this boy was carrying a gun they had to follow procedures of what was reported .... they were doing their job if anyone is to blame its the gang culture that puts guns into young hands that where the problem lays and where innocents get mixed up .. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would armed police come and arrest me? https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/19/met-rammed-boy-13-playing-with-water-pistol-off-bike-and-pointed-guns-at-him What’s going on here guys? Is it racism? " Anyway, Pickleman, this is a site that worships BBC, without irony, so it is unlikely you will get the response you are looking for. Although, I feel obliged to say, I am partial to some BBC! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""The Met said it was called to a report of a gun in the street and was obliged under policy to treat all firearms as dangerous until proven otherwise." Surely they were following procedure? Someone made a report they attended, yes maybe a bit ott but if a report has been made until they can prove it's not real they have to consider the safety that a potential gun was pointed at a girl and took measures to prevent someone potentially getting harmed. Im unsure how it's race related they responded to a report of a minor with a firearm. Mrs " Really?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Frankly, Steve, I don't know why you bothered - I read this thread, and it played out exactly as I thought it would...deflect, deflect, turn it on the "perpetrator", justify it by "well, the black crime rate", "it could have been a real gun because young black boys", blah blah blah, rinse and repeat. And this is "tolerance"?? The bottom line is, the police were called on a 13 year-old boy with a blue water pistol, and his younger sister who had a pink water pistol...didn't bother to check further to see what if anything was happening, didn't stop to watch them having a water fight. He was rammed off his bike by armed police, knocked to the ground and officers pointed their submachine guns at him and he was handcuffed. He deserved that no more than I did being arrested at 12 for "stealing" my mum's coat, which she'd sent me to collect from a dry cleaners. But yeah, just add "playing while black" to the list...and before anyone wants to come at me with the usual "defending the indefensible" BS, you could save your breath, and maybe try and find somewhere inside yourselves some empathy for the situation that boy found himself in, through no fault of his own. But you won't. Well said! I'm obviously not black, but what I struggle with most on threads like these is people's inability to see things from a a different perspective, wilfully or not, or to understand why that perspective may be different to theirs, shaped through the years. I guess they don't need to, safe in the knowledge they and their children are highly unlikely ever to face the same treatment, even in identical situations. But they'll also say there's no such thing as white privilege." But racist police are a real thing. These people have a few weeks training and are sent out into the world to pretend they are impartial defenders of laws they barely understand...WTF!? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""The Met said it was called to a report of a gun in the street and was obliged under policy to treat all firearms as dangerous until proven otherwise." Surely they were following procedure? Someone made a report they attended, yes maybe a bit ott but if a report has been made until they can prove it's not real they have to consider the safety that a potential gun was pointed at a girl and took measures to prevent someone potentially getting harmed. Im unsure how it's race related they responded to a report of a minor with a firearm. Mrs An officer saw a 13 year old playing with a BLUE water pistol and called for armed police? They called his mum aggressive but it was her intervention that got him ‘de arrested’. The trauma from incidents like this, that impacts Black CHILDREN more than anyone else when we have mental health services that aren’t trained to deal with racial trauma is ridiculous. Black boys and girls aren’t ever just children. Part of the racism that we face is that we are men and women from the moment we’re walking. your missing the point it was reported to the police that this boy was carrying a gun they had to follow procedures of what was reported .... they were doing their job if anyone is to blame its the gang culture that puts guns into young hands that where the problem lays and where innocents get mixed up .. " No. You are missing the point. We have very few gun crimes in this country. And certainly even fewer involving children. I would want my police force to get this. Oh, and the brightly coloured plastic would have been a dead give away once they were on the scene. Those men (and I bet they were men) should be ashamed of themselves. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. Naturally Black children are big scary adults who make the Big Wesponsible Powice (who stand between us and civilisation collapsing) cower in their big manly boots. White people didn't know what they were doing, were so young (into their 40s) and/ or were mentally ill and therefore are never responsible for anything. Actually though you jest, my Dad was that white man you described albeit he was in his 30's. Yeah having loaded guns pointed at you is fucking terrifying. What did the police do confiscate his guns for a while. Make jokes all you like gun crime is not funny regardless of who the culprit is. Yes, the point I'm making is that crime is hilarious. So funny. Maybe the point I'm making is that Black people are made out to be responsible disproportionately to white people in public discourse, and that's fucking ridiculous, and we as white people should stop allowing ourselves to be infantalised and given cookies for not being total shitstains because it's vaguely convenient (and we don't think that the power will ever be turned against us)? Don't carry a gun... Don't get knicked.? Don't play with a toy with your siblings if you don't want to be brutalised by the police. Is that the message you're ok with sending to children? Or only black children? Where do you get only black children from? I didn't say anything about colour. You did. What nutter of any colour plays with guns with their kids? " Water pistols? I don't know what kind of childhood you had, but me and every nutter and otherwise with children I knew. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""The Met said it was called to a report of a gun in the street and was obliged under policy to treat all firearms as dangerous until proven otherwise." Surely they were following procedure? Someone made a report they attended, yes maybe a bit ott but if a report has been made until they can prove it's not real they have to consider the safety that a potential gun was pointed at a girl and took measures to prevent someone potentially getting harmed. Im unsure how it's race related they responded to a report of a minor with a firearm. Mrs An officer saw a 13 year old playing with a BLUE water pistol and called for armed police? They called his mum aggressive but it was her intervention that got him ‘de arrested’. The trauma from incidents like this, that impacts Black CHILDREN more than anyone else when we have mental health services that aren’t trained to deal with racial trauma is ridiculous. Black boys and girls aren’t ever just children. Part of the racism that we face is that we are men and women from the moment we’re walking. your missing the point it was reported to the police that this boy was carrying a gun they had to follow procedures of what was reported .... they were doing their job if anyone is to blame its the gang culture that puts guns into young hands that where the problem lays and where innocents get mixed up .. No. You are missing the point. We have very few gun crimes in this country. And certainly even fewer involving children. I would want my police force to get this. Oh, and the brightly coloured plastic would have been a dead give away once they were on the scene. Those men (and I bet they were men) should be ashamed of themselves. " Out of interest. What happened when they realised they were not guns? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""The Met said it was called to a report of a gun in the street and was obliged under policy to treat all firearms as dangerous until proven otherwise." Surely they were following procedure? Someone made a report they attended, yes maybe a bit ott but if a report has been made until they can prove it's not real they have to consider the safety that a potential gun was pointed at a girl and took measures to prevent someone potentially getting harmed. Im unsure how it's race related they responded to a report of a minor with a firearm. Mrs An officer saw a 13 year old playing with a BLUE water pistol and called for armed police? They called his mum aggressive but it was her intervention that got him ‘de arrested’. The trauma from incidents like this, that impacts Black CHILDREN more than anyone else when we have mental health services that aren’t trained to deal with racial trauma is ridiculous. Black boys and girls aren’t ever just children. Part of the racism that we face is that we are men and women from the moment we’re walking. your missing the point it was reported to the police that this boy was carrying a gun they had to follow procedures of what was reported .... they were doing their job if anyone is to blame its the gang culture that puts guns into young hands that where the problem lays and where innocents get mixed up .. No. You are missing the point. We have very few gun crimes in this country. And certainly even fewer involving children. I would want my police force to get this. Oh, and the brightly coloured plastic would have been a dead give away once they were on the scene. Those men (and I bet they were men) should be ashamed of themselves. Out of interest. What happened when they realised they were not guns? " They were handcuffed and dragged away, of course. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just a thought. And hopefully taken in the spirit intended. If they did wrong then let them be punished / retrained or whatever needs to happen. But... Is it possible that children can play a waterfight without replica or anything looking like a gun and then avoid any unnecessary aggro? I mean would whatever happened have happened if they were pointing those big yellow super soakers like clangers? Not blaming just saying. " Sorry, you're right. Those kids and their fucking brightly coloured super soakers that look nothing like any weapon that anyone has ever seen. They deserve what they have coming. Nah. Those wankers need to be sacked. They can not be trusted to make safe decisions around the use of firearms. They were millimetres away from shooting those kids. It is not forgivable. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just a thought. And hopefully taken in the spirit intended. If they did wrong then let them be punished / retrained or whatever needs to happen. But... Is it possible that children can play a waterfight without replica or anything looking like a gun and then avoid any unnecessary aggro? I mean would whatever happened have happened if they were pointing those big yellow super soakers like clangers? Not blaming just saying. " I'm sorry, but, seriously?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just a thought. And hopefully taken in the spirit intended. If they did wrong then let them be punished / retrained or whatever needs to happen. But... Is it possible that children can play a waterfight without replica or anything looking like a gun and then avoid any unnecessary aggro? I mean would whatever happened have happened if they were pointing those big yellow super soakers like clangers? Not blaming just saying. Sorry, you're right. Those kids and their fucking brightly coloured super soakers that look nothing like any weapon that anyone has ever seen. They deserve what they have coming. Nah. Those wankers need to be sacked. They can not be trusted to make safe decisions around the use of firearms. They were millimetres away from shooting those kids. It is not forgivable. " Quite. I can't even. How dare those children play. The police must have never seen anything so awful. Poor poor police | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's good to be passionate. It's not good to be offensive. " You called people nutters for playing with water pistols as children. I don't think you can talk. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a nipper we had those stupid little water pistols the plastic see thru one's that had three squirts if you was lucky. Favourite was an old washing up liquid bottle." When I was at school some of the leavers, on their last day, filled bigger ones with piss and went after the teachers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Playing devils advocate here. There is an entire industry dedicated to customising real fire arms to look like toys. Not sure what the reasoning is behind it. Google Block 17 to see a Lego style, REAL Glock 17 pistol. " Devil's advocate? To what end? Why? This just needs straight forward condemnation. There is no excuse or the weird double down stuff either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Criminals have spray can painted toy guns black and real firearms pink to look like toys.You have no idea what you are confronting by how it looks.When kids as young as ten have been found with firearms,an incident involving a child is not automatically a mistake or false alarm." Which 10 year old was found with a firearm? Where? When? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Playing devils advocate here. There is an entire industry dedicated to customising real fire arms to look like toys. Not sure what the reasoning is behind it. Google Block 17 to see a Lego style, REAL Glock 17 pistol. " Impressive! And, your point is? That brightly coloured water pistols can be threatening to highly trained police officers? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. Naturally Black children are big scary adults who make the Big Wesponsible Powice (who stand between us and civilisation collapsing) cower in their big manly boots. White people didn't know what they were doing, were so young (into their 40s) and/ or were mentally ill and therefore are never responsible for anything. Actually though you jest, my Dad was that white man you described albeit he was in his 30's. Yeah having loaded guns pointed at you is fucking terrifying. What did the police do confiscate his guns for a while. Make jokes all you like gun crime is not funny regardless of who the culprit is. Yes, the point I'm making is that crime is hilarious. So funny. Maybe the point I'm making is that Black people are made out to be responsible disproportionately to white people in public discourse, and that's fucking ridiculous, and we as white people should stop allowing ourselves to be infantalised and given cookies for not being total shitstains because it's vaguely convenient (and we don't think that the power will ever be turned against us)? Don't carry a gun... Don't get knicked.? Don't play with a toy with your siblings if you don't want to be brutalised by the police. Is that the message you're ok with sending to children? Or only black children? Where do you get only black children from? I didn't say anything about colour. You did. What nutter of any colour plays with guns with their kids? Water pistols? I don't know what kind of childhood you had, but me and every nutter and otherwise with children I knew. " My dad was a career crim. He used to deal in firearms so we always had a few real guns to play with lying around the house. One of my earliest memories is playing with dad's friends pistol - I have since found out that he always carried a Walther PPK with him. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Criminals have spray can painted toy guns black and real firearms pink to look like toys.You have no idea what you are confronting by how it looks.When kids as young as ten have been found with firearms,an incident involving a child is not automatically a mistake or false alarm. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm? Where? When?" https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/children-guns-as-young-as-10-among-1-500-child-arrests-for-firearm-offences-in-three-years-a6957361.html | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Criminals have spray can painted toy guns black and real firearms pink to look like toys.You have no idea what you are confronting by how it looks.When kids as young as ten have been found with firearms,an incident involving a child is not automatically a mistake or false alarm. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm? Where? When? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/children-guns-as-young-as-10-among-1-500-child-arrests-for-firearm-offences-in-three-years-a6957361.html" Yeah. It's a fantasy fear mongering bit of fluff with lots of suspected crimes. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm. It doesn't say. We have relatively few wild firearms in this country. I suspect a lot of these kids had waterpistols. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it’s good to know how people feel about 13 year old Black men. Naturally Black children are big scary adults who make the Big Wesponsible Powice (who stand between us and civilisation collapsing) cower in their big manly boots. White people didn't know what they were doing, were so young (into their 40s) and/ or were mentally ill and therefore are never responsible for anything. Actually though you jest, my Dad was that white man you described albeit he was in his 30's. Yeah having loaded guns pointed at you is fucking terrifying. What did the police do confiscate his guns for a while. Make jokes all you like gun crime is not funny regardless of who the culprit is. Yes, the point I'm making is that crime is hilarious. So funny. Maybe the point I'm making is that Black people are made out to be responsible disproportionately to white people in public discourse, and that's fucking ridiculous, and we as white people should stop allowing ourselves to be infantalised and given cookies for not being total shitstains because it's vaguely convenient (and we don't think that the power will ever be turned against us)? Don't carry a gun... Don't get knicked.? Don't play with a toy with your siblings if you don't want to be brutalised by the police. Is that the message you're ok with sending to children? Or only black children? Where do you get only black children from? I didn't say anything about colour. You did. What nutter of any colour plays with guns with their kids? Water pistols? I don't know what kind of childhood you had, but me and every nutter and otherwise with children I knew. My dad was a career crim. He used to deal in firearms so we always had a few real guns to play with lying around the house. One of my earliest memories is playing with dad's friends pistol - I have since found out that he always carried a Walther PPK with him. " Oh I don't doubt it happened occasionally, but the equivocation between "water pistol" and "gun" is absurd in context. It's trying to make out that this child did something wrong by playing with a toy. If this had been a well off white family, it would never had happened, and if it did, some high up politician or royal would have already handed the family the police officer's testicles. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"your missing the point it was reported to the police that this boy was carrying a gun they had to follow procedures of what was reported .... they were doing their job if anyone is to blame its the gang culture that puts guns into young hands that where the problem lays and where innocents get mixed up .." ‘He was having a water fight with his younger sibling when an ON PATROL OFFICER reported a potential firearms incident.’ That’s the first thing before the armed officers even arrive. When they arrive, their handling is questionable if you’re extremely generous to them. Which most people on fab are I think. Not a bad thing just an observation. (https://news.sky.com/story/amp/boy-13-surrounded-by-armed-police-in-hackney-after-water-pistol-mistaken-for-real-gun-12987185) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Criminals have spray can painted toy guns black and real firearms pink to look like toys.You have no idea what you are confronting by how it looks.When kids as young as ten have been found with firearms,an incident involving a child is not automatically a mistake or false alarm. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm? Where? When? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/children-guns-as-young-as-10-among-1-500-child-arrests-for-firearm-offences-in-three-years-a6957361.html Yeah. It's a fantasy fear mongering bit of fluff with lots of suspected crimes. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm. It doesn't say. We have relatively few wild firearms in this country. I suspect a lot of these kids had waterpistols. " There are more firearms(illegal,ie prohibited or without licence) in this country and firearms incidents than before the knee jerk reaction to Dunblane.The idea "we have relatively few wild firearms" is laughable. The ten year old in question was protected by the "legal reasons"legislation,which is why the media have been very vague on details. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Criminals have spray can painted toy guns black and real firearms pink to look like toys.You have no idea what you are confronting by how it looks.When kids as young as ten have been found with firearms,an incident involving a child is not automatically a mistake or false alarm. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm? Where? When? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/children-guns-as-young-as-10-among-1-500-child-arrests-for-firearm-offences-in-three-years-a6957361.html Yeah. It's a fantasy fear mongering bit of fluff with lots of suspected crimes. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm. It doesn't say. We have relatively few wild firearms in this country. I suspect a lot of these kids had waterpistols. There are more firearms(illegal,ie prohibited or without licence) in this country and firearms incidents than before the knee jerk reaction to Dunblane.The idea "we have relatively few wild firearms" is laughable. The ten year old in question was protected by the "legal reasons"legislation,which is why the media have been very vague on details." Okay | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. These kinds of mistakes? We’re talking about a 13 year old that was moments away from dying because a police officer couldn’t tell that a blue water gun was clearly a blue water gun. God Bless Tamir Rice who died in America because of this ‘human error’. Tamir Rice would be 21 if he wasn’t shot by a police officer almost exactly 9 years ago. " That's why we are fortunate don't live in USA shot 1st policy . Happened to us over 40 years ago Worked at a garage in a mainly black area And my work friend had a decommissioned gun .. Our apprentice young black guy was messing about with it Someone must have reported it Armed police turned up Wasn't a pleasant experience But we all understood why and none of us was treated any different | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Criminals have spray can painted toy guns black and real firearms pink to look like toys.You have no idea what you are confronting by how it looks.When kids as young as ten have been found with firearms,an incident involving a child is not automatically a mistake or false alarm. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm? Where? When? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/children-guns-as-young-as-10-among-1-500-child-arrests-for-firearm-offences-in-three-years-a6957361.html Yeah. It's a fantasy fear mongering bit of fluff with lots of suspected crimes. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm. It doesn't say. We have relatively few wild firearms in this country. I suspect a lot of these kids had waterpistols. " It's good that you have that knowledge. I don't know if we have few wild firearms whatever that may be. However in my time it certainly seems like gun crimes have increased over the last 40 years which is not a good thing. As for the "innocence of cap guns and water pistols" of course. In my opinion I'd never give a kid any kind of gun as a toy. In fairness not because I'd imagine plod would get involved but more because I am simply anti gun... Just see no need for it as there are more than enough other toys and didnt want my kids pointing things at people learning to shoot for fun. All of that said. If the police have done wrong then there should be consequences.out of interest were any of the police who called it in or responded of colour? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. These kinds of mistakes? We’re talking about a 13 year old that was moments away from dying because a police officer couldn’t tell that a blue water gun was clearly a blue water gun. God Bless Tamir Rice who died in America because of this ‘human error’. Tamir Rice would be 21 if he wasn’t shot by a police officer almost exactly 9 years ago. " Nor is the first paragraph here a fact. It's driven by emotion and a hugely biased response | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Criminals have spray can painted toy guns black and real firearms pink to look like toys.You have no idea what you are confronting by how it looks.When kids as young as ten have been found with firearms,an incident involving a child is not automatically a mistake or false alarm. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm? Where? When? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/children-guns-as-young-as-10-among-1-500-child-arrests-for-firearm-offences-in-three-years-a6957361.html Yeah. It's a fantasy fear mongering bit of fluff with lots of suspected crimes. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm. It doesn't say. We have relatively few wild firearms in this country. I suspect a lot of these kids had waterpistols. It's good that you have that knowledge. I don't know if we have few wild firearms whatever that may be. However in my time it certainly seems like gun crimes have increased over the last 40 years which is not a good thing. As for the "innocence of cap guns and water pistols" of course. In my opinion I'd never give a kid any kind of gun as a toy. In fairness not because I'd imagine plod would get involved but more because I am simply anti gun... Just see no need for it as there are more than enough other toys and didnt want my kids pointing things at people learning to shoot for fun. All of that said. If the police have done wrong then there should be consequences.out of interest were any of the police who called it in or responded of colour? " I have to ask? Why? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Criminals have spray can painted toy guns black and real firearms pink to look like toys.You have no idea what you are confronting by how it looks.When kids as young as ten have been found with firearms,an incident involving a child is not automatically a mistake or false alarm. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm? Where? When? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/children-guns-as-young-as-10-among-1-500-child-arrests-for-firearm-offences-in-three-years-a6957361.html Yeah. It's a fantasy fear mongering bit of fluff with lots of suspected crimes. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm. It doesn't say. We have relatively few wild firearms in this country. I suspect a lot of these kids had waterpistols. " None of the suspects/offenders are named. To my knowledge we still thankfully don't name names. Choosing to ignore facts because they don't suit doesn't mean they aren't facts though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Criminals have spray can painted toy guns black and real firearms pink to look like toys.You have no idea what you are confronting by how it looks.When kids as young as ten have been found with firearms,an incident involving a child is not automatically a mistake or false alarm. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm? Where? When? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/children-guns-as-young-as-10-among-1-500-child-arrests-for-firearm-offences-in-three-years-a6957361.html Yeah. It's a fantasy fear mongering bit of fluff with lots of suspected crimes. Which 10 year old was found with a firearm. It doesn't say. We have relatively few wild firearms in this country. I suspect a lot of these kids had waterpistols. It's good that you have that knowledge. I don't know if we have few wild firearms whatever that may be. However in my time it certainly seems like gun crimes have increased over the last 40 years which is not a good thing. As for the "innocence of cap guns and water pistols" of course. In my opinion I'd never give a kid any kind of gun as a toy. In fairness not because I'd imagine plod would get involved but more because I am simply anti gun... Just see no need for it as there are more than enough other toys and didnt want my kids pointing things at people learning to shoot for fun. All of that said. If the police have done wrong then there should be consequences.out of interest were any of the police who called it in or responded of colour? I have to ask? Why?" Because it has been made about race by some people. If race is important for some participants it's important for all surely? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If they were close enough to arrest him then they were close enough to know it was a water pistol. Take the kid's ethnicity out of the equation and see it for the shocking incident it was. Any kid would be shit scared being approached and ordered about by people with machine guns. This is fucking appalling and an awful overreaction that could have gone very wrong very quickly. No matter what you believe, statistically black kids are more likely to have negative interactions with the police. I've seen it first hand growing up and experienced the bias. Friends treated differently to myself just because of their skin colour in our interactions with the cops. " I was reading this thread and feeling a bit...... Thank you for saying this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Frankly, Steve, I don't know why you bothered - I read this thread, and it played out exactly as I thought it would...deflect, deflect, turn it on the "perpetrator", justify it by "well, the black crime rate", "it could have been a real gun because young black boys", blah blah blah, rinse and repeat. And this is "tolerance"?? The bottom line is, the police were called on a 13 year-old boy with a blue water pistol, and his younger sister who had a pink water pistol...didn't bother to check further to see what if anything was happening, didn't stop to watch them having a water fight. He was rammed off his bike by armed police, knocked to the ground and officers pointed their submachine guns at him and he was handcuffed. He deserved that no more than I did being arrested at 12 for "stealing" my mum's coat, which she'd sent me to collect from a dry cleaners. But yeah, just add "playing while black" to the list...and before anyone wants to come at me with the usual "defending the indefensible" BS, you could save your breath, and maybe try and find somewhere inside yourselves some empathy for the situation that boy found himself in, through no fault of his own. But you won't." Thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s always about racism otherwise they wouldn’t have anything to moan about 3d printed guys can be make to look just like toy guns. The police handle reports of a gun seriously until they know it’s not a gun The police can’t win. They either don’t do enough, do too much, and god forbid they do anything to a person that isn’t white, that’s racist. " I'm not sure doing anything to a person who isn't white is the issue. The fact is they do some things to people who aren't white a lot more than they do to people who are white. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You know what I'm not going to bother,I just wrote a lengthy post and deleted it because it seems that the mentality is if you don't agree 100% with the OP the insinuation is your racist regardless of what you say. It's possible to have an opinion without racist. I'm not going to participate any further and before anyone jump's on me I think the police were justified in attending the incident but their handling was disproportionate and clumsy. " Sorry the firearms unit correct in attending,the officer who called them is almost definitely the cause of the incident. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You know what I'm not going to bother,I just wrote a lengthy post and deleted it because it seems that the mentality is if you don't agree 100% with the OP the insinuation is your racist regardless of what you say. It's possible to have an opinion without racist. I'm not going to participate any further and before anyone jump's on me I think the police were justified in attending the incident but their handling was disproportionate and clumsy. " Agreed that's why we don't comment on posts like this as it runs the risk of being called something we are not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"For anyone confused about why the police would react to a brightly coloured supersoaker https://cdn.manomano.com/images/images_products/29865617/L/103564076_2.jpg This was the water pistol, modelled after a glock. Definitely not the type of water pistol I had as a kid. There’s a few people to blame here 1. The company making kids toys that look like real guns 2. The parents who got them these guns, then allowed them to play out in the street with them. 3. Gang culture that has realised you can get kids to carry your weapons/guns, which forces police to react to kids more harshly Some of the replies on this thread show an unwillingness to look at what’s actually happened and instead fall for race bait outrage " Agreed. As well as the companies that make real guns look like kids toys. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You know what I'm not going to bother,I just wrote a lengthy post and deleted it because it seems that the mentality is if you don't agree 100% with the OP the insinuation is your racist regardless of what you say. It's possible to have an opinion without racist. I'm not going to participate any further and before anyone jump's on me I think the police were justified in attending the incident but their handling was disproportionate and clumsy. " Absolutely with you here! Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Facts are facts. White travellers in this country get away with more crime of any kind than any other racial group. " Where did this fact come from? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I tell you something, re the comments about black men being disproportionately involved in violent crime, if the police went after travellers in the same way they’d soon even the figures up. Facts are facts. White travellers in this country get away with more crime of any kind than any other racial group. If you’re black you’re gonna be targeted. If you’re a low income/social status white person you’ll be targeted slightly less. If you’re a well off ‘respectable’ middle aged white man you won’t be targeted. If you’re a white traveller you’ve got carte blanche to do what you like. Leaving race out of it for a moment, these were children. That 13 year old CHILD will carry that experience to his grave, along with his younger sister and his mother. All three of them will now be so wary of the police. Race relations are shite in ethnic communities with police anyway, things like this do more damage than good. Any human being can watch two children having a water fight and make the distinction between harmless fun and potential danger. If that police officer really struggled then they shouldn’t be in the job. " In fairness. You didn't see what the police guy saw. So can't really know. I coach teenage kids. There are 13 year olds with stubble and look 18 so again. Very hard to make any assumptions what was "seen". That they will carry it with them for ever and will colour their opinions of police. Absolutely true as evidenced also in this thread. Not justifying in any way anything police may have done in this incident. But if you're in a "targeted" demographic, the last thing you'd do is give them a toy gun to take on the street? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. These kinds of mistakes? We’re talking about a 13 year old that was moments away from dying because a police officer couldn’t tell that a blue water gun was clearly a blue water gun. God Bless Tamir Rice who died in America because of this ‘human error’. Tamir Rice would be 21 if he wasn’t shot by a police officer almost exactly 9 years ago. " Maybe you should put yourself in a career where you have to make these sort of spilt second decisions knowing the wrong decision could result in death for you or another. Then you would be fully qualified to comment on it. You're making your judgement on something from a place of safety and where the full facts have been established. It's not even remotely close to the circumstances officers find themselves in when making their decisions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Out of interest, has anyone got any knowledge of the incident that isn't from a newspaper/online outlet? 1- has anyone seen the toy guns that were used? 2- has anyone spoken to anyone involved on the day? 3- was anyone there at the time? Unless you can truthfully answer yes to any of those questions, you're guessing. And that puts all of us in the same boat. There are separate issues here which aren't changed by that fact. 1- Are there racist Police officers? Certainly, just like there are racist shop workers, binmen and doctors. Racism is ever present in our society. 2- Are some kids around this age dangerous little shits? Certainly, and I'd suggest you don't really know which ones until you're in a situation with them. 3- Do the police go out of their way to employ a multicultural police service? Certainly, and every year they recruit a higher % of diverse ethnicities than almost any other profession. 4- Does the media deliberately focus on specific elements of an incident in order to sensationalise it and make money. Without a doubt, it's their job now. Reading through this post has made me really sad. There was an opportunity to have a real conversation about this incident. All that's happened is that people are pushed to one side or the other. The kid was wrong, the police were wrong. If this is the response to reporting like this, the situations never going to get better. Racism is utterly pointless. I've always thought that anything that divides people into little groups works against the strength of society. Societies flourish when there is diversity of opinion and experience. That doesn't mean I'll base an opinion on a story written by someone who wasn't there, and didn't see what happened. More importantly, they don't care what happened, just how it sounds when it's down in print. " This is without a doubt the most sensible, accurate and eloquent post I have ever seen on a fab forum | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Out of interest, has anyone got any knowledge of the incident that isn't from a newspaper/online outlet? 1- has anyone seen the toy guns that were used? 2- has anyone spoken to anyone involved on the day? 3- was anyone there at the time? Unless you can truthfully answer yes to any of those questions, you're guessing. And that puts all of us in the same boat. There are separate issues here which aren't changed by that fact. 1- Are there racist Police officers? Certainly, just like there are racist shop workers, binmen and doctors. Racism is ever present in our society. 2- Are some kids around this age dangerous little shits? Certainly, and I'd suggest you don't really know which ones until you're in a situation with them. 3- Do the police go out of their way to employ a multicultural police service? Certainly, and every year they recruit a higher % of diverse ethnicities than almost any other profession. 4- Does the media deliberately focus on specific elements of an incident in order to sensationalise it and make money. Without a doubt, it's their job now. Reading through this post has made me really sad. There was an opportunity to have a real conversation about this incident. All that's happened is that people are pushed to one side or the other. The kid was wrong, the police were wrong. If this is the response to reporting like this, the situations never going to get better. Racism is utterly pointless. I've always thought that anything that divides people into little groups works against the strength of society. Societies flourish when there is diversity of opinion and experience. That doesn't mean I'll base an opinion on a story written by someone who wasn't there, and didn't see what happened. More importantly, they don't care what happened, just how it sounds when it's down in print. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Out of interest, has anyone got any knowledge of the incident that isn't from a newspaper/online outlet? 1- has anyone seen the toy guns that were used? 2- has anyone spoken to anyone involved on the day? 3- was anyone there at the time? Unless you can truthfully answer yes to any of those questions, you're guessing. And that puts all of us in the same boat. There are separate issues here which aren't changed by that fact. 1- Are there racist Police officers? Certainly, just like there are racist shop workers, binmen and doctors. Racism is ever present in our society. 2- Are some kids around this age dangerous little shits? Certainly, and I'd suggest you don't really know which ones until you're in a situation with them. 3- Do the police go out of their way to employ a multicultural police service? Certainly, and every year they recruit a higher % of diverse ethnicities than almost any other profession. 4- Does the media deliberately focus on specific elements of an incident in order to sensationalise it and make money. Without a doubt, it's their job now. Reading through this post has made me really sad. There was an opportunity to have a real conversation about this incident. All that's happened is that people are pushed to one side or the other. The kid was wrong, the police were wrong. If this is the response to reporting like this, the situations never going to get better. Racism is utterly pointless. I've always thought that anything that divides people into little groups works against the strength of society. Societies flourish when there is diversity of opinion and experience. That doesn't mean I'll base an opinion on a story written by someone who wasn't there, and didn't see what happened. More importantly, they don't care what happened, just how it sounds when it's down in print. " see my brief post above not as detailed as yours x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. These kinds of mistakes? We’re talking about a 13 year old that was moments away from dying because a police officer couldn’t tell that a blue water gun was clearly a blue water gun. God Bless Tamir Rice who died in America because of this ‘human error’. Tamir Rice would be 21 if he wasn’t shot by a police officer almost exactly 9 years ago. Maybe you should put yourself in a career where you have to make these sort of spilt second decisions knowing the wrong decision could result in death for you or another. Then you would be fully qualified to comment on it. You're making your judgement on something from a place of safety and where the full facts have been established. It's not even remotely close to the circumstances officers find themselves in when making their decisions." Absolutely right. The people the Police deal with are more varied and more informed than they ever have been. The world is now a place where a water pistol could be full of acid, a 10yr old could be carrying a knife, and happy to use it. I don't want to be facing those decisions every day, and really, no one does. But that's their job. Personally I'm glad that no one was hurt above all else. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I removed my comments for similar reasons. I read the thread and the 'knowledge' that people are using of the incident is 100% hear say. What people decide to leave out of their rationalising or reasoning or what they leave out because they simply don't know and what they add in because it seems 'logical' or comment sense simply distorts everything. No one has a complete picture of what happened. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You know what I'm not going to bother,I just wrote a lengthy post and deleted it because it seems that the mentality is if you don't agree 100% with the OP the insinuation is your racist regardless of what you say. It's possible to have an opinion without racist. I'm not going to participate any further and before anyone jump's on me I think the police were justified in attending the incident but their handling was disproportionate and clumsy. Absolutely with you here! Mrs " I don’t understand why you’re both under the impression that I think you’re racist for disagreeing or not thinking this is about race. Frankly it’s a really lazy assumption about me and one that is suggestive of the fact that my understanding of racism is weak. If I think someone is a racist I have more valid reasons than this. I’ve not implied anyone in this thread is a racist simply because I disagree with them and have articulated that in posts. Both your comment earlier and this comment you’re replying to along with frida’s comment are kinda insulting to my intelligence but whatever. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Racism is utterly pointless. I've always thought that anything that divides people into little groups works against the strength of society. Societies flourish when there is diversity of opinion and experience. " It is. But based on its history, it has been used to establish, reinforce and reflect power relations in societies. It’s unavoidable that it exists. Racism is pointless but it exists and we have to fight it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fwiw, Steve, I'm just going to back you up. You have called no-one racist on this thread, or even suggested it, so it's unfair for anyone to say otherwise. On the actual incident, it's obviously not racist to say you think the police got this right. But, and I made this point earlier, if you think the police would not think twice about taking the same approach to a 13yo white child, then you've not been paying attention. You might not like it, but there's an awful lot of evidence pointing to differences in treatment (and outcome) between black and white people. I don't think we should accept that as ok." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. Totally with you, had it been real and they'd not responded it would be a different story. Mrs But it was a blue and pink water gun. so let’s focus on what actually happened And until they got close enough to identify it wasn't dangerous they don't know that, guns these days aren't all black/silver. They responded to a potential fire arms incident with a person potentially in danger, they did the right thing. I'm sorry I don't agree with you here pickles. They would have responsibility to any potential fire arms call regardless of ethnicity & if they didn't respond at all then that's an issue. Mrs Why are they called? Why is the officer making that call about a 13 year old without even an inkling that they’re having a water fight. 30 seconds it takes to recognise that kids are playing with water and not bullets. Literally 30 seconds. Like I said. Black kids don’t get to be kids. And if you know, you know. " Is it possible that the police officer who called this is just wasn't competent rather than racist? Is it possible that office had been threatened, intimidated or hurt in an incident involving youths before and didn't handle this one well? Is it possible the officer was racist? Sadly, yes to all. I've seen some shocking footage recently of local kids on a bus assaulting another passenger who tried to stop them bullying a young girl. The kids were 10-14 and all white. They punched, kicked and spat on a white male in his 30s. On a bus, in the middle of the day. Events like this don't make the news because they're so common now that's there's no sensational angle. It's just sad. Race is a part of what skews people's perceptions now, but so is age, appearance and location. None of these things is as clear cut as they once were. I don't experience the prejudice a black man does. A black man doesn't experience the prejudice a woman does. Most of us don't experience the prejudice the Police do. And for those who are also black, or female etc it's harder again. I don't see any press articles talking about the prejudice faced by paramedics, police officers or hospital staff. It's not sensational enough. There's a lot of talk on most online platforms about trolls, sowing dissent, causing conflict, and agitating people against each other. That sounds a lot like most of the media right now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Apologies to all for my moment of weakness posting this thread. I should’ve known how it would go. But to clarify I don’t think anyone is a racist simply because they disagree with me on this - Whether I personally think there is racism at play here or not. This idea about me on the forums is so exhausting and is such a common tactic used to stop people from talking about race and racism. But like I’ve just said, mostly it’s insulting to someone’s intelligence and their understanding of racism. I’ve read plenty and studied plenty about racism. I know what it is and isn’t. So if we could please stop with the lazy implications based on personal feelings or insecurity or something else, I’d appreciate it. Especially from people that I don’t know and have never spoken to properly about racism before. " Who cares what they think about you. Some will appreciate you and some won't. You get people talking about it and that can only be a good thing. If they are abusive take it as a compliment that you have affected them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Racism is utterly pointless. I've always thought that anything that divides people into little groups works against the strength of society. Societies flourish when there is diversity of opinion and experience. It is. But based on its history, it has been used to establish, reinforce and reflect power relations in societies. It’s unavoidable that it exists. Racism is pointless but it exists and we have to fight it. " Surely what we have to fight is ignorance and prejudice, not just racism? Every time we boil prejudice down to one focus, we're allowing other prejudices more room. Can someone be black and racist? Yes. Can someone be female and sexist? Yes. Can we all be prejudiced or biased based on our life experiences? Yes. Just saying we have to fight racism isn't enough. In my personal opinion only, there's only one spectrum for humans and it isn't based on race, sex, religion or gender. At one end is decent inclusive human being and the other end is total evil arsehole. We're all on that spectrum and it should be the only thing we use to differentiate. The difficulty will always come from that fact that a group will be persecuted and then they have to be part of the long term solution by not repeating the behaviour they've experienced. I can't even begin to imagine how hard that would be. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The Met has serious issues with corruption & accountability. It is in serious need of reform and has done for years. Whether it's dealing with race, treatment of sexual assault victims, turning a blind eye to crimes by government officials or issues with criminal behaviour by its own officers. In this specific case, the armed response team did its job and acted on the information it had. The fact that reacted poorly when confronted by an angry parent can be explained by having to deal with the sudden adrenaline comedown. Going from possible shooting to community policing is going to be a hard switch for anyone. There are serious differences between this case & Tamir Rice. Rice was killed by a 'gypsy cop' who had been flagged at his previous job in California as someone who should not be trusted with a firearm and had issues that could not be trained out. In the US cops shoot and kill over 1000 people a year. British fire-arms officers are an elite group of highly trained professionals and the kid is upset, but they notably weren't shot. If there are serious questions to be asked it is of the officer who called the situation in. There were two kids playing with water pistols. The sister does not appear to have been arrested and appears to have been seen as a potential victim. The officer who decided there was a potential firearms incident and didn't take the time to fully assess the situation, de-escalate it or cancel the shout when it was clear what was happening likely has some serious explaining to do. In terms of age. Speaking as a parent of teens; someone who has handled firearms; as someone who was almost beaten to death by a group of kids between the ages 10 and 16. 13-year-olds are perfectly capable of violence and of doing serious harm to others. If they have access to an Airsoft gun, air rifle let alone a firearm serious physical harm or death are a real possibility. Does the Met have a race issue? Oh god yes. Is that institutional thinking an issue in this case? Yes, but not by the firearms team. They got a report acted on it in line with policy and their training. The Met did the right thing in apologising. The officer who called it in is the key fault in this sad, but fortunately not tragic story. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The Met has serious issues with corruption & accountability. It is in serious need of reform and has done for years. Whether it's dealing with race, treatment of sexual assault victims, turning a blind eye to crimes by government officials or issues with criminal behaviour by its own officers. In this specific case, the armed response team did its job and acted on the information it had. The fact that reacted poorly when confronted by an angry parent can be explained by having to deal with the sudden adrenaline comedown. Going from possible shooting to community policing is going to be a hard switch for anyone. There are serious differences between this case & Tamir Rice. Rice was killed by a 'gypsy cop' who had been flagged at his previous job in California as someone who should not be trusted with a firearm and had issues that could not be trained out. In the US cops shoot and kill over 1000 people a year. British fire-arms officers are an elite group of highly trained professionals and the kid is upset, but they notably weren't shot. If there are serious questions to be asked it is of the officer who called the situation in. There were two kids playing with water pistols. The sister does not appear to have been arrested and appears to have been seen as a potential victim. The officer who decided there was a potential firearms incident and didn't take the time to fully assess the situation, de-escalate it or cancel the shout when it was clear what was happening likely has some serious explaining to do. In terms of age. Speaking as a parent of teens; someone who has handled firearms; as someone who was almost beaten to death by a group of kids between the ages 10 and 16. 13-year-olds are perfectly capable of violence and of doing serious harm to others. If they have access to an Airsoft gun, air rifle let alone a firearm serious physical harm or death are a real possibility. Does the Met have a race issue? Oh god yes. Is that institutional thinking an issue in this case? Yes, but not by the firearms team. They got a report acted on it in line with policy and their training. The Met did the right thing in apologising. The officer who called it in is the key fault in this sad, but fortunately not tragic story. " Thanks for sharing that. These can sometimes be good and informative discussions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"WOW just wow. Guys you all need to YouTube stop and search in Britian. The one and one of many but this one was a call that a group of young black males one of which had a firearm. When the met stopped and search them (armed officers) there were two white males with the group who were put to onside whilst the police searched the others, throwing one to the ground and holding him down by his neck (before George Floyd). The white youths expected to be searched and said to the police but they were ignored. Disgusting that the assault on a 13 year old is seen as proportionate. In the past we wouldn't listen to people of colour who insisted that the police were racist, that the police had killed a person just because of the colour of their skin, that the police are corrupt. It took several r4pes, kidn4pping and murder, sexual exposure racist WhatsApp groups etc. that were committed against white people before anyone listened to the black experience. So I guess we will have to wait until police shoot or assault a 13 yr old white boy before we listen and learn that it is us who allow this behaviour from the police and as long as we stay silent this behaviour will continue." Read that post out loud. But replace every mention of police, with black, or trans or female. It sounds hateful doesn't it? If the only way to deal with incidents like this is to show prejudice against another group, we're truly fucked as a society. Bear in mind that there are incidents like this every day, but only certain ones get traction. And not all of them are warranted. Again, social media being a cattle prod for conflict continuation. There are plenty of posts in this thread that show people understand that there are issues here that should be addressed. Deciding there's only one view, based on a YouTube video and a paper article seems a bit narrow doesn't it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"WOW just wow. Guys you all need to YouTube stop and search in Britian. The one and one of many but this one was a call that a group of young black males one of which had a firearm. When the met stopped and search them (armed officers) there were two white males with the group who were put to onside whilst the police searched the others, throwing one to the ground and holding him down by his neck (before George Floyd). The white youths expected to be searched and said to the police but they were ignored. Disgusting that the assault on a 13 year old is seen as proportionate. In the past we wouldn't listen to people of colour who insisted that the police were racist, that the police had killed a person just because of the colour of their skin, that the police are corrupt. It took several r4pes, kidn4pping and murder, sexual exposure racist WhatsApp groups etc. that were committed against white people before anyone listened to the black experience. So I guess we will have to wait until police shoot or assault a 13 yr old white boy before we listen and learn that it is us who allow this behaviour from the police and as long as we stay silent this behaviour will continue. Read that post out loud. But replace every mention of police, with black, or trans or female. It sounds hateful doesn't it? If the only way to deal with incidents like this is to show prejudice against another group, we're truly fucked as a society. Bear in mind that there are incidents like this every day, but only certain ones get traction. And not all of them are warranted. Again, social media being a cattle prod for conflict continuation. There are plenty of posts in this thread that show people understand that there are issues here that should be addressed. Deciding there's only one view, based on a YouTube video and a paper article seems a bit narrow doesn't it? " I looked for the video The first 2 were someone being searched and a knife being found each time The 3rd was someone assaulting an officer during the search, and a knife found after The 4th was when the police had a report of a black man walking down the street with a sword. The police searched a black guy and the white guy wasn’t searched. Racist or going on info provided? Not sure. It’s a hard line to distinguish. The police should use info and data available to them. 38% of all knife crime is committed by an ethnic minority in the uk and that number jumps to 2/3rds within London. Is it racist to react to those statistics? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You know what I'm not going to bother,I just wrote a lengthy post and deleted it because it seems that the mentality is if you don't agree 100% with the OP the insinuation is your racist regardless of what you say. It's possible to have an opinion without racist. I'm not going to participate any further and before anyone jump's on me I think the police were justified in attending the incident but their handling was disproportionate and clumsy. Absolutely with you here! Mrs I don’t understand why you’re both under the impression that I think you’re racist for disagreeing or not thinking this is about race. Frankly it’s a really lazy assumption about me and one that is suggestive of the fact that my understanding of racism is weak. If I think someone is a racist I have more valid reasons than this. I’ve not implied anyone in this thread is a racist simply because I disagree with them and have articulated that in posts. Both your comment earlier and this comment you’re replying to along with frida’s comment are kinda insulting to my intelligence but whatever. " Wasn't going to post but since you called me out, for insulting your intelligence. You're response to me saying that human error can occur was totally disproportionate and not well thought out, in my opinion. Do I believe the police are as an institution is racist? Yes. But that's not what you asked in your OP, you asked an opinion on an incident. There are articles such as the one below that highlights the problem. Which are far more important to discuss. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/mar/26/race-disparity-police-strip-searches-of-children-england-and-wales But meh, I've discussed many different issues with others that are difficult and complex, and learnt loads from them. I'll keep learning and discussing with them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"WOW just wow. Guys you all need to YouTube stop and search in Britian. The one and one of many but this one was a call that a group of young black males one of which had a firearm. When the met stopped and search them (armed officers) there were two white males with the group who were put to onside whilst the police searched the others, throwing one to the ground and holding him down by his neck (before George Floyd). The white youths expected to be searched and said to the police but they were ignored. Disgusting that the assault on a 13 year old is seen as proportionate. In the past we wouldn't listen to people of colour who insisted that the police were racist, that the police had killed a person just because of the colour of their skin, that the police are corrupt. It took several r4pes, kidn4pping and murder, sexual exposure racist WhatsApp groups etc. that were committed against white people before anyone listened to the black experience. So I guess we will have to wait until police shoot or assault a 13 yr old white boy before we listen and learn that it is us who allow this behaviour from the police and as long as we stay silent this behaviour will continue. Read that post out loud. But replace every mention of police, with black, or trans or female. It sounds hateful doesn't it? If the only way to deal with incidents like this is to show prejudice against another group, we're truly fucked as a society. Bear in mind that there are incidents like this every day, but only certain ones get traction. And not all of them are warranted. Again, social media being a cattle prod for conflict continuation. There are plenty of posts in this thread that show people understand that there are issues here that should be addressed. Deciding there's only one view, based on a YouTube video and a paper article seems a bit narrow doesn't it? I looked for the video The first 2 were someone being searched and a knife being found each time The 3rd was someone assaulting an officer during the search, and a knife found after The 4th was when the police had a report of a black man walking down the street with a sword. The police searched a black guy and the white guy wasn’t searched. Racist or going on info provided? Not sure. It’s a hard line to distinguish. The police should use info and data available to them. 38% of all knife crime is committed by an ethnic minority in the uk and that number jumps to 2/3rds within London. Is it racist to react to those statistics?" There's a school of thought around circular outcomes for bias. If you think a group is more likely to be criminal, you're more likely to stop them. Because you've stopped more of that group, you're more likely to find something. That can then lead to more bias towards that group. Some areas are predominantly peopled by a specific ethnicity. If the Police carry out 100 s&s on young males in hackney, they'll end up searching more black men than white. If they did the same thing in Harlow, they'd end up searching more white men than black. That isn't racism, it's just the demographic in those areas. Why are we at the stage where s&s has to be the norm? What about the number of s&s which do find weapons or drugs, or proceeds of crime money? No system is going to get these things right all the time. None of that means prejudice isn't present. It just means we can't assume it's based on prejudice. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"WOW just wow. Guys you all need to YouTube stop and search in Britian. The one and one of many but this one was a call that a group of young black males one of which had a firearm. When the met stopped and search them (armed officers) there were two white males with the group who were put to onside whilst the police searched the others, throwing one to the ground and holding him down by his neck (before George Floyd). The white youths expected to be searched and said to the police but they were ignored. Disgusting that the assault on a 13 year old is seen as proportionate. In the past we wouldn't listen to people of colour who insisted that the police were racist, that the police had killed a person just because of the colour of their skin, that the police are corrupt. It took several r4pes, kidn4pping and murder, sexual exposure racist WhatsApp groups etc. that were committed against white people before anyone listened to the black experience. So I guess we will have to wait until police shoot or assault a 13 yr old white boy before we listen and learn that it is us who allow this behaviour from the police and as long as we stay silent this behaviour will continue. Read that post out loud. But replace every mention of police, with black, or trans or female. It sounds hateful doesn't it? If the only way to deal with incidents like this is to show prejudice against another group, we're truly fucked as a society. Bear in mind that there are incidents like this every day, but only certain ones get traction. And not all of them are warranted. Again, social media being a cattle prod for conflict continuation. There are plenty of posts in this thread that show people understand that there are issues here that should be addressed. Deciding there's only one view, based on a YouTube video and a paper article seems a bit narrow doesn't it? I looked for the video The first 2 were someone being searched and a knife being found each time The 3rd was someone assaulting an officer during the search, and a knife found after The 4th was when the police had a report of a black man walking down the street with a sword. The police searched a black guy and the white guy wasn’t searched. Racist or going on info provided? Not sure. It’s a hard line to distinguish. The police should use info and data available to them. 38% of all knife crime is committed by an ethnic minority in the uk and that number jumps to 2/3rds within London. Is it racist to react to those statistics?" Yes it is. Why. Because the root cause will expose further racism, youth crime has risen when community funding was stopped not cut but stopped outright. Throwing mainly ethnic minorities out on to the streets, why because their parent or parents have to work, some working more than one job. There are many other reason, but mostly it affects minorities and some white people who have the misfortune to live in poverty. Wheres is the hope, the commitment to there being, a positive future. It is easy to be taken in by gangs when one has no outlook, maybe expelled from school for being black. And I have only scratched the surface, you need to live the experience of a minority or a least held witness to speak about it. And as for the videos we have seen different ones which hold our views, but mine are direct experience have witnessed minorities being searched and held for large amounts of time which is uncessery. I say again give your head a wobble, it is not right to hold a firearm at a 13yr old, it is not professional in anyway whatsoever. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I say again give your head a wobble, it is not right to hold a firearm at a 13yr old, it is not professional in anyway whatsoever." Ever? Never? Anyone painting these issues as entirely black and white expose themselves as lacking the critical thinking abilities to discuss the topic | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"WOW just wow. Guys you all need to YouTube stop and search in Britian. The one and one of many but this one was a call that a group of young black males one of which had a firearm. When the met stopped and search them (armed officers) there were two white males with the group who were put to onside whilst the police searched the others, throwing one to the ground and holding him down by his neck (before George Floyd). The white youths expected to be searched and said to the police but they were ignored. Disgusting that the assault on a 13 year old is seen as proportionate. In the past we wouldn't listen to people of colour who insisted that the police were racist, that the police had killed a person just because of the colour of their skin, that the police are corrupt. It took several r4pes, kidn4pping and murder, sexual exposure racist WhatsApp groups etc. that were committed against white people before anyone listened to the black experience. So I guess we will have to wait until police shoot or assault a 13 yr old white boy before we listen and learn that it is us who allow this behaviour from the police and as long as we stay silent this behaviour will continue. Read that post out loud. But replace every mention of police, with black, or trans or female. It sounds hateful doesn't it? If the only way to deal with incidents like this is to show prejudice against another group, we're truly fucked as a society. Bear in mind that there are incidents like this every day, but only certain ones get traction. And not all of them are warranted. Again, social media being a cattle prod for conflict continuation. There are plenty of posts in this thread that show people understand that there are issues here that should be addressed. Deciding there's only one view, based on a YouTube video and a paper article seems a bit narrow doesn't it? I looked for the video The first 2 were someone being searched and a knife being found each time The 3rd was someone assaulting an officer during the search, and a knife found after The 4th was when the police had a report of a black man walking down the street with a sword. The police searched a black guy and the white guy wasn’t searched. Racist or going on info provided? Not sure. It’s a hard line to distinguish. The police should use info and data available to them. 38% of all knife crime is committed by an ethnic minority in the uk and that number jumps to 2/3rds within London. Is it racist to react to those statistics? There's a school of thought around circular outcomes for bias. If you think a group is more likely to be criminal, you're more likely to stop them. Because you've stopped more of that group, you're more likely to find something. That can then lead to more bias towards that group. Some areas are predominantly peopled by a specific ethnicity. If the Police carry out 100 s&s on young males in hackney, they'll end up searching more black men than white. If they did the same thing in Harlow, they'd end up searching more white men than black. That isn't racism, it's just the demographic in those areas. Why are we at the stage where s&s has to be the norm? What about the number of s&s which do find weapons or drugs, or proceeds of crime money? No system is going to get these things right all the time. None of that means prejudice isn't present. It just means we can't assume it's based on prejudice." That’s a good point. 95% of stop and searches are on men We never hear calls of sexism about it because as understand the police are using the data and statistics. And I agree there. It’s not sexism, the vast majority of violent crime is committed by men, they should be searched more often But do it with race and we’re quick to call it racism | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"WOW just wow. Guys you all need to YouTube stop and search in Britian. The one and one of many but this one was a call that a group of young black males one of which had a firearm. When the met stopped and search them (armed officers) there were two white males with the group who were put to onside whilst the police searched the others, throwing one to the ground and holding him down by his neck (before George Floyd). The white youths expected to be searched and said to the police but they were ignored. Disgusting that the assault on a 13 year old is seen as proportionate. In the past we wouldn't listen to people of colour who insisted that the police were racist, that the police had killed a person just because of the colour of their skin, that the police are corrupt. It took several r4pes, kidn4pping and murder, sexual exposure racist WhatsApp groups etc. that were committed against white people before anyone listened to the black experience. So I guess we will have to wait until police shoot or assault a 13 yr old white boy before we listen and learn that it is us who allow this behaviour from the police and as long as we stay silent this behaviour will continue. Read that post out loud. But replace every mention of police, with black, or trans or female. It sounds hateful doesn't it? If the only way to deal with incidents like this is to show prejudice against another group, we're truly fucked as a society. Bear in mind that there are incidents like this every day, but only certain ones get traction. And not all of them are warranted. Again, social media being a cattle prod for conflict continuation. There are plenty of posts in this thread that show people understand that there are issues here that should be addressed. Deciding there's only one view, based on a YouTube video and a paper article seems a bit narrow doesn't it? I looked for the video The first 2 were someone being searched and a knife being found each time The 3rd was someone assaulting an officer during the search, and a knife found after The 4th was when the police had a report of a black man walking down the street with a sword. The police searched a black guy and the white guy wasn’t searched. Racist or going on info provided? Not sure. It’s a hard line to distinguish. The police should use info and data available to them. 38% of all knife crime is committed by an ethnic minority in the uk and that number jumps to 2/3rds within London. Is it racist to react to those statistics? There's a school of thought around circular outcomes for bias. If you think a group is more likely to be criminal, you're more likely to stop them. Because you've stopped more of that group, you're more likely to find something. That can then lead to more bias towards that group. Some areas are predominantly peopled by a specific ethnicity. If the Police carry out 100 s&s on young males in hackney, they'll end up searching more black men than white. If they did the same thing in Harlow, they'd end up searching more white men than black. That isn't racism, it's just the demographic in those areas. Why are we at the stage where s&s has to be the norm? What about the number of s&s which do find weapons or drugs, or proceeds of crime money? No system is going to get these things right all the time. None of that means prejudice isn't present. It just means we can't assume it's based on prejudice." They are a minority a low percentage of the British population, but are over represented in crime and in the prison service, where those who have power over them are white the largest demographic in this isle. And you think the narrative is right because the MSM report black knife crime, so they must be treated differently, sounds like Gaza to me. Whats going on here is indifference and a lack of education as to what is happening in our country, which you are unaware of it seems. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"WOW just wow. Guys you all need to YouTube stop and search in Britian. The one and one of many but this one was a call that a group of young black males one of which had a firearm. When the met stopped and search them (armed officers) there were two white males with the group who were put to onside whilst the police searched the others, throwing one to the ground and holding him down by his neck (before George Floyd). The white youths expected to be searched and said to the police but they were ignored. Disgusting that the assault on a 13 year old is seen as proportionate. In the past we wouldn't listen to people of colour who insisted that the police were racist, that the police had killed a person just because of the colour of their skin, that the police are corrupt. It took several r4pes, kidn4pping and murder, sexual exposure racist WhatsApp groups etc. that were committed against white people before anyone listened to the black experience. So I guess we will have to wait until police shoot or assault a 13 yr old white boy before we listen and learn that it is us who allow this behaviour from the police and as long as we stay silent this behaviour will continue. Read that post out loud. But replace every mention of police, with black, or trans or female. It sounds hateful doesn't it? If the only way to deal with incidents like this is to show prejudice against another group, we're truly fucked as a society. Bear in mind that there are incidents like this every day, but only certain ones get traction. And not all of them are warranted. Again, social media being a cattle prod for conflict continuation. There are plenty of posts in this thread that show people understand that there are issues here that should be addressed. Deciding there's only one view, based on a YouTube video and a paper article seems a bit narrow doesn't it? I looked for the video The first 2 were someone being searched and a knife being found each time The 3rd was someone assaulting an officer during the search, and a knife found after The 4th was when the police had a report of a black man walking down the street with a sword. The police searched a black guy and the white guy wasn’t searched. Racist or going on info provided? Not sure. It’s a hard line to distinguish. The police should use info and data available to them. 38% of all knife crime is committed by an ethnic minority in the uk and that number jumps to 2/3rds within London. Is it racist to react to those statistics? Yes it is. Why. Because the root cause will expose further racism, youth crime has risen when community funding was stopped not cut but stopped outright. Throwing mainly ethnic minorities out on to the streets, why because their parent or parents have to work, some working more than one job. There are many other reason, but mostly it affects minorities and some white people who have the misfortune to live in poverty. Wheres is the hope, the commitment to there being, a positive future. It is easy to be taken in by gangs when one has no outlook, maybe expelled from school for being black. And I have only scratched the surface, you need to live the experience of a minority or a least held witness to speak about it. And as for the videos we have seen different ones which hold our views, but mine are direct experience have witnessed minorities being searched and held for large amounts of time which is uncessery. I say again give your head a wobble, it is not right to hold a firearm at a 13yr old, it is not professional in anyway whatsoever." In the same way your experiences have shaped your views, the same applies to others. Have you ever been a trained firearms officer? If not, should you 'give your head a wobble' for not understanding? Or is this just a good opportunity to learn something and take a moment to think fresh thoughts about a difficult subject? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got to say if I was a police officer attending a potential fire arm incident and a gun was pointed at a child, I know I'd probably act defensively too. They have split seconds to make a decision, and it would haunt me for the rest of my life if a child was shot because I took too long to respond to the situation. These kind of mistakes will happen due to human error. But I'd rather the error was this way around and not a dead child. These kinds of mistakes? We’re talking about a 13 year old that was moments away from dying because a police officer couldn’t tell that a blue water gun was clearly a blue water gun. God Bless Tamir Rice who died in America because of this ‘human error’. Tamir Rice would be 21 if he wasn’t shot by a police officer almost exactly 9 years ago. If black males weren't vastly over-represented in violent crime these things wouldn't happen. Every race case reported by the media turns out to be a pack of lies and distortion. Now take your politics somewhere else. " Every race case Wow! The Met have been shown to be an organisation riddled with racism among other issues. But in every case you believe they are innocent. Your politics are somewhat skewed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"WOW just wow. Guys you all need to YouTube stop and search in Britian. The one and one of many but this one was a call that a group of young black males one of which had a firearm. When the met stopped and search them (armed officers) there were two white males with the group who were put to onside whilst the police searched the others, throwing one to the ground and holding him down by his neck (before George Floyd). The white youths expected to be searched and said to the police but they were ignored. Disgusting that the assault on a 13 year old is seen as proportionate. In the past we wouldn't listen to people of colour who insisted that the police were racist, that the police had killed a person just because of the colour of their skin, that the police are corrupt. It took several r4pes, kidn4pping and murder, sexual exposure racist WhatsApp groups etc. that were committed against white people before anyone listened to the black experience. So I guess we will have to wait until police shoot or assault a 13 yr old white boy before we listen and learn that it is us who allow this behaviour from the police and as long as we stay silent this behaviour will continue. Read that post out loud. But replace every mention of police, with black, or trans or female. It sounds hateful doesn't it? If the only way to deal with incidents like this is to show prejudice against another group, we're truly fucked as a society. Bear in mind that there are incidents like this every day, but only certain ones get traction. And not all of them are warranted. Again, social media being a cattle prod for conflict continuation. There are plenty of posts in this thread that show people understand that there are issues here that should be addressed. Deciding there's only one view, based on a YouTube video and a paper article seems a bit narrow doesn't it? I looked for the video The first 2 were someone being searched and a knife being found each time The 3rd was someone assaulting an officer during the search, and a knife found after The 4th was when the police had a report of a black man walking down the street with a sword. The police searched a black guy and the white guy wasn’t searched. Racist or going on info provided? Not sure. It’s a hard line to distinguish. The police should use info and data available to them. 38% of all knife crime is committed by an ethnic minority in the uk and that number jumps to 2/3rds within London. Is it racist to react to those statistics? There's a school of thought around circular outcomes for bias. If you think a group is more likely to be criminal, you're more likely to stop them. Because you've stopped more of that group, you're more likely to find something. That can then lead to more bias towards that group. Some areas are predominantly peopled by a specific ethnicity. If the Police carry out 100 s&s on young males in hackney, they'll end up searching more black men than white. If they did the same thing in Harlow, they'd end up searching more white men than black. That isn't racism, it's just the demographic in those areas. Why are we at the stage where s&s has to be the norm? What about the number of s&s which do find weapons or drugs, or proceeds of crime money? No system is going to get these things right all the time. None of that means prejudice isn't present. It just means we can't assume it's based on prejudice. They are a minority a low percentage of the British population, but are over represented in crime and in the prison service, where those who have power over them are white the largest demographic in this isle. And you think the narrative is right because the MSM report black knife crime, so they must be treated differently, sounds like Gaza to me. Whats going on here is indifference and a lack of education as to what is happening in our country, which you are unaware of it seems." Careful. When did I l say the narrative was right? Read again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I say again give your head a wobble, it is not right to hold a firearm at a 13yr old, it is not professional in anyway whatsoever. Ever? Never? Anyone painting these issues as entirely black and white expose themselves as lacking the critical thinking abilities to discuss the topic " I have no need to think like you do I have witnessed it many times and I am never searched or even acknowledged I am alright. That tells me all I need to know, critical thinking is to cover the true nature of racism which is a black and white issue which is why it is called racism. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"WOW just wow. Guys you all need to YouTube stop and search in Britian. The one and one of many but this one was a call that a group of young black males one of which had a firearm. When the met stopped and search them (armed officers) there were two white males with the group who were put to onside whilst the police searched the others, throwing one to the ground and holding him down by his neck (before George Floyd). The white youths expected to be searched and said to the police but they were ignored. Disgusting that the assault on a 13 year old is seen as proportionate. In the past we wouldn't listen to people of colour who insisted that the police were racist, that the police had killed a person just because of the colour of their skin, that the police are corrupt. It took several r4pes, kidn4pping and murder, sexual exposure racist WhatsApp groups etc. that were committed against white people before anyone listened to the black experience. So I guess we will have to wait until police shoot or assault a 13 yr old white boy before we listen and learn that it is us who allow this behaviour from the police and as long as we stay silent this behaviour will continue. Read that post out loud. But replace every mention of police, with black, or trans or female. It sounds hateful doesn't it? If the only way to deal with incidents like this is to show prejudice against another group, we're truly fucked as a society. Bear in mind that there are incidents like this every day, but only certain ones get traction. And not all of them are warranted. Again, social media being a cattle prod for conflict continuation. There are plenty of posts in this thread that show people understand that there are issues here that should be addressed. Deciding there's only one view, based on a YouTube video and a paper article seems a bit narrow doesn't it? I looked for the video The first 2 were someone being searched and a knife being found each time The 3rd was someone assaulting an officer during the search, and a knife found after The 4th was when the police had a report of a black man walking down the street with a sword. The police searched a black guy and the white guy wasn’t searched. Racist or going on info provided? Not sure. It’s a hard line to distinguish. The police should use info and data available to them. 38% of all knife crime is committed by an ethnic minority in the uk and that number jumps to 2/3rds within London. Is it racist to react to those statistics? There's a school of thought around circular outcomes for bias. If you think a group is more likely to be criminal, you're more likely to stop them. Because you've stopped more of that group, you're more likely to find something. That can then lead to more bias towards that group. Some areas are predominantly peopled by a specific ethnicity. If the Police carry out 100 s&s on young males in hackney, they'll end up searching more black men than white. If they did the same thing in Harlow, they'd end up searching more white men than black. That isn't racism, it's just the demographic in those areas. Why are we at the stage where s&s has to be the norm? What about the number of s&s which do find weapons or drugs, or proceeds of crime money? No system is going to get these things right all the time. None of that means prejudice isn't present. It just means we can't assume it's based on prejudice. They are a minority a low percentage of the British population, but are over represented in crime and in the prison service, where those who have power over them are white the largest demographic in this isle. And you think the narrative is right because the MSM report black knife crime, so they must be treated differently, sounds like Gaza to me. Whats going on here is indifference and a lack of education as to what is happening in our country, which you are unaware of it seems. Careful. When did I l say the narrative was right? Read again. " I am always careful. Some areas are predominantly peopled by a specific ethnicity. If the Police carry out 100 s&s on young males in hackney, they'll end up searching more black men than white. If they did the same thing in Harlow, they'd end up searching more white men than black. That isn't racism, it's just the demographic in those areas. That is what I call a sound bite or newspeak that the MSM spew out, as an excuse to stop and search a large group of minority people, large group of a minority. I assume thus as from what you have said you have no experience so must have read it somewhere, if I am wrong and you wish to let me know how you come to this conclusion feel free. It is well established on here that MSM are not to be trusted in anyway. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Out of interest, has anyone got any knowledge of the incident that isn't from a newspaper/online outlet? 1- has anyone seen the toy guns that were used? 2- has anyone spoken to anyone involved on the day? 3- was anyone there at the time? Unless you can truthfully answer yes to any of those questions, you're guessing. And that puts all of us in the same boat. There are separate issues here which aren't changed by that fact. 1- Are there racist Police officers? Certainly, just like there are racist shop workers, binmen and doctors. Racism is ever present in our society. 2- Are some kids around this age dangerous little shits? Certainly, and I'd suggest you don't really know which ones until you're in a situation with them. 3- Do the police go out of their way to employ a multicultural police service? Certainly, and every year they recruit a higher % of diverse ethnicities than almost any other profession. 4- Does the media deliberately focus on specific elements of an incident in order to sensationalise it and make money. Without a doubt, it's their job now. Reading through this post has made me really sad. There was an opportunity to have a real conversation about this incident. All that's happened is that people are pushed to one side or the other. The kid was wrong, the police were wrong. If this is the response to reporting like this, the situations never going to get better. Racism is utterly pointless. I've always thought that anything that divides people into little groups works against the strength of society. Societies flourish when there is diversity of opinion and experience. That doesn't mean I'll base an opinion on a story written by someone who wasn't there, and didn't see what happened. More importantly, they don't care what happened, just how it sounds when it's down in print. " Whilst most of your post is very sensible I do take issue with saying the kid was wrong. He was a child playing with his sister. He wasn't wrong in any sense of the word | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Out of interest, has anyone got any knowledge of the incident that isn't from a newspaper/online outlet? 1- has anyone seen the toy guns that were used? 2- has anyone spoken to anyone involved on the day? 3- was anyone there at the time? Unless you can truthfully answer yes to any of those questions, you're guessing. And that puts all of us in the same boat. There are separate issues here which aren't changed by that fact. 1- Are there racist Police officers? Certainly, just like there are racist shop workers, binmen and doctors. Racism is ever present in our society. 2- Are some kids around this age dangerous little shits? Certainly, and I'd suggest you don't really know which ones until you're in a situation with them. 3- Do the police go out of their way to employ a multicultural police service? Certainly, and every year they recruit a higher % of diverse ethnicities than almost any other profession. 4- Does the media deliberately focus on specific elements of an incident in order to sensationalise it and make money. Without a doubt, it's their job now. Reading through this post has made me really sad. There was an opportunity to have a real conversation about this incident. All that's happened is that people are pushed to one side or the other. The kid was wrong, the police were wrong. If this is the response to reporting like this, the situations never going to get better. Racism is utterly pointless. I've always thought that anything that divides people into little groups works against the strength of society. Societies flourish when there is diversity of opinion and experience. That doesn't mean I'll base an opinion on a story written by someone who wasn't there, and didn't see what happened. More importantly, they don't care what happened, just how it sounds when it's down in print. Whilst most of your post is very sensible I do take issue with saying the kid was wrong. He was a child playing with his sister. He wasn't wrong in any sense of the word" The line you're referring to isn't saying the kid and the police were wrong. It's saying that those are the sides promoted by the reporting. It's not one or the other. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You know what I'm not going to bother,I just wrote a lengthy post and deleted it because it seems that the mentality is if you don't agree 100% with the OP the insinuation is your racist regardless of what you say. It's possible to have an opinion without racist. I'm not going to participate any further and before anyone jump's on me I think the police were justified in attending the incident but their handling was disproportionate and clumsy. Absolutely with you here! Mrs I don’t understand why you’re both under the impression that I think you’re racist for disagreeing or not thinking this is about race. Frankly it’s a really lazy assumption about me and one that is suggestive of the fact that my understanding of racism is weak. If I think someone is a racist I have more valid reasons than this. I’ve not implied anyone in this thread is a racist simply because I disagree with them and have articulated that in posts. Both your comment earlier and this comment you’re replying to along with frida’s comment are kinda insulting to my intelligence but whatever. Wasn't going to post but since you called me out, for insulting your intelligence. You're response to me saying that human error can occur was totally disproportionate and not well thought out, in my opinion. Do I believe the police are as an institution is racist? Yes. But that's not what you asked in your OP, you asked an opinion on an incident. There are articles such as the one below that highlights the problem. Which are far more important to discuss. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/mar/26/race-disparity-police-strip-searches-of-children-england-and-wales But meh, I've discussed many different issues with others that are difficult and complex, and learnt loads from them. I'll keep learning and discussing with them. " You said ‘People are able to disagree with you, without being racist.’ And along with the two posters above I’m still waiting for someone to tell me where I’ve implied that people disagreeing with me are racist? It is insulting to my intelligence to suggest I have such a shallow understanding of racism that my conclusion is - if you don’t think this case is racism then you’re racist. Especially when I’ve not said or suggested that about anyone. That’s the comment I was talking about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |