FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Moon landing

Moon landing

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *ebanbetsy OP   Couple  over a year ago

merseyside

Did they yes or No ?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Yep. That was easy.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ebanbetsy OP   Couple  over a year ago

merseyside

As fake as some profiles on ere

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *icecouple561Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex

If they didn't there were an awful lot of people in on the hoax

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *TG3Man  over a year ago

Dorchester


"As fake as some profiles on ere "
buzz he definitely set foot on the moon

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *tarboy300Man  over a year ago

DUBLIN/KILDARE


"As fake as some profiles on ere "

I agree fully 100%

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *uddy laneMan  over a year ago

dudley


"If they didn't there were an awful lot of people in on the hoax "

You could say that about the non Iraq WMD.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

We know it didn't happen. It is blindingly obvious that it did not happen. No one is so gullible today to believe that man went all the way to the fcukeng moon and did not bring back a lump of fcukeng cheese! Ejits, the lot of ya!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Not fake

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *cottish guy 555Man  over a year ago

London


"As fake as some profiles on ere buzz he definitely set foot on the moon "

And he punched a guy for suggesting otherwise

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"We know it didn't happen. It is blindingly obvious that it did not happen. No one is so gullible today to believe that man went all the way to the fcukeng moon and did not bring back a lump of fcukeng cheese! Ejits, the lot of ya!"

Oh hang on.

You got me thinking now!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *valanche1001Man  over a year ago

Leeds

Yes

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otsossieMan  over a year ago

Chesterfield


"bring back a lump of fcukeng cheese! Ejits, the lot of ya!"

There is far more “moon rock” kicking about than was ever brought back.

But some WAS brought back. We’ve even photographed the mess they left behind up there.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *TG3Man  over a year ago

Dorchester


"As fake as some profiles on ere buzz he definitely set foot on the moon

And he punched a guy for suggesting otherwise "

really thats thuggery

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *icecouple561Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"If they didn't there were an awful lot of people in on the hoax

You could say that about the non Iraq WMD."

I could but we're not talking about that

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hillenCouple  over a year ago

Borehamwood

More difficult to fake it than do it. Had it been faked the Soviets would have taken great pleasure in providing evidence of it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It is probably the only thing I am sceptical about.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *icecouple561Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex


"We know it didn't happen. It is blindingly obvious that it did not happen. No one is so gullible today to believe that man went all the way to the fcukeng moon and did not bring back a lump of fcukeng cheese! Ejits, the lot of ya!"

It's green cheese though. Nobody is going to want that

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ou only live onceMan  over a year ago

London

I'm going to go with yes. But I'm normally on the side of fact.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Yes the did land on the moon

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *TG3Man  over a year ago

Dorchester


"I'm going to go with yes. But I'm normally on the side of fact."
you'd need to be there to know it happened

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ou only live onceMan  over a year ago

London


"I'm going to go with yes. But I'm normally on the side of fact.you'd need to be there to know it happened "

No you wouldn't.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otsossieMan  over a year ago

Chesterfield


"More difficult to fake it than do it. Had it been faked the Soviets would have taken great pleasure in providing evidence of it. "

They’re just jealous they couldn’t fake it too.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *TG3Man  over a year ago

Dorchester


"I'm going to go with yes. But I'm normally on the side of fact.you'd need to be there to know it happened

No you wouldn't."

how could you be sure otherwise

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I believe that man has landed on the moon, but not necessarily first in 1969. It's conceivably possible that they completed every part of the first mission except for the final landing stage. Tensions between the US and the USSR during the Cold War were such that a successful lunar landing by either side would have been a massive propaganda win, and the final stage could have been faked. Telemetry received by mission control would have accurate to this point. Technology at the time was very limited.

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *aitonelMan  over a year ago

Away for Christmas


"More difficult to fake it than do it. Had it been faked the Soviets would have taken great pleasure in providing evidence of it. "

Indeed. Only now is 1 Russian (former head of some Russian space program, but now on frontlones of the war) is claiming he doesn't believe they did.

On top of that you have hundreds of hours of recordings, conversations back and forth between control and the astronauts. General chit chat and technical stuff. That's a hell of a lot of script to create and record for the sake of faking it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ou only live onceMan  over a year ago

London


"I'm going to go with yes. But I'm normally on the side of fact.you'd need to be there to know it happened

No you wouldn't.how could you be sure otherwise "

Do you only believe things to be true if you've seen them with your own eyes? Must be tough to get by.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ebanbetsy OP   Couple  over a year ago

merseyside


"I believe that man has landed on the moon, but not necessarily first in 1969. It's conceivably possible that they completed every part of the first mission except for the final landing stage. Tensions between the US and the USSR during the Cold War were such that a successful lunar landing by either side would have been a massive propaganda win, and the final stage could have been faked. Telemetry received by mission control would have accurate to this point. Technology at the time was very limited.

Bess x"

think you’ve just changed my mind you sound like you know wot your talking about Xxx

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otsossieMan  over a year ago

Chesterfield


"Do you only believe things to be true if you've seen them with your own eyes? "

Surprised they haven’t suffocated or floated off into space themselves.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *aitonelMan  over a year ago

Away for Christmas


"I believe that man has landed on the moon, but not necessarily first in 1969. It's conceivably possible that they completed every part of the first mission except for the final landing stage. Tensions between the US and the USSR during the Cold War were such that a successful lunar landing by either side would have been a massive propaganda win, and the final stage could have been faked. Telemetry received by mission control would have accurate to this point. Technology at the time was very limited.

Bess x"

But Russia concede and admitted that US got there first, despite them already being in orbit with Lunar 15 days before Appllo 11.

Russia, China, and North Korea would not allow any part of the landing to be televised in their nations.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple  over a year ago

Leeds

Maybe, maybe not, you’ll never know the real truth. I believe it happened but then again I love all things astronomical, so maybe I’m a little bias.

But I also believe nasa are full of shit.

The mr

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eroLondonMan  over a year ago

Mayfair


"I'm going to go with yes. But I'm normally on the side of fact.

·

you'd need to be there to know it happened "

You weren't there when you were conceived.

Result.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *cottish guy 555Man  over a year ago

London


"As fake as some profiles on ere buzz he definitely set foot on the moon

And he punched a guy for suggesting otherwise really thats thuggery "

Or completely understandable for a guy who achieved one of the greatest feats in human history and who kept getting asked bollocks by idiots for 40 years. And I am aware it was over 50 years ago but I can't remember when he lamped the twat

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I believe that man has landed on the moon, but not necessarily first in 1969. It's conceivably possible that they completed every part of the first mission except for the final landing stage. Tensions between the US and the USSR during the Cold War were such that a successful lunar landing by either side would have been a massive propaganda win, and the final stage could have been faked. Telemetry received by mission control would have accurate to this point. Technology at the time was very limited.

Bess x

But Russia concede and admitted that US got there first, despite them already being in orbit with Lunar 15 days before Appllo 11.

Russia, China, and North Korea would not allow any part of the landing to be televised in their nations. "

I'm not taking the yes or no position either way, but the political situation at the time may have convinced the Soviets to openly concede to save face - a kind of damage limitation scenario.

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ealitybitesMan  over a year ago

Belfast

So you are one of those who believes the moon actually exists?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otsossieMan  over a year ago

Chesterfield


"So you are one of those who believes the moon actually exists? "

On the end of a stick

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *aitonelMan  over a year ago

Away for Christmas


"I believe that man has landed on the moon, but not necessarily first in 1969. It's conceivably possible that they completed every part of the first mission except for the final landing stage. Tensions between the US and the USSR during the Cold War were such that a successful lunar landing by either side would have been a massive propaganda win, and the final stage could have been faked. Telemetry received by mission control would have accurate to this point. Technology at the time was very limited.

Bess x

But Russia concede and admitted that US got there first, despite them already being in orbit with Lunar 15 days before Appllo 11.

Russia, China, and North Korea would not allow any part of the landing to be televised in their nations.

I'm not taking the yes or no position either way, but the political situation at the time may have convinced the Soviets to openly concede to save face - a kind of damage limitation scenario.

Bess x"

Maybe, though I'd also suspect they would have looked for any kind of evidence that it was faked, to throw the whole thing in to dispute at the time. It was as you say, the cold war after all, spies and espionage were everywhere.

Oppenheimer and the -bomb just goes to show what can be achieved despite it being thought impossible to do previously. When it comes to such a race.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I believe that man has landed on the moon, but not necessarily first in 1969. It's conceivably possible that they completed every part of the first mission except for the final landing stage. Tensions between the US and the USSR during the Cold War were such that a successful lunar landing by either side would have been a massive propaganda win, and the final stage could have been faked. Telemetry received by mission control would have accurate to this point. Technology at the time was very limited.

Bess x

But Russia concede and admitted that US got there first, despite them already being in orbit with Lunar 15 days before Appllo 11.

Russia, China, and North Korea would not allow any part of the landing to be televised in their nations.

I'm not taking the yes or no position either way, but the political situation at the time may have convinced the Soviets to openly concede to save face - a kind of damage limitation scenario.

Bess x

Maybe, though I'd also suspect they would have looked for any kind of evidence that it was faked, to throw the whole thing in to dispute at the time. It was as you say, the cold war after all, spies and espionage were everywhere.

Oppenheimer and the -bomb just goes to show what can be achieved despite it being thought impossible to do previously. When it comes to such a race. "

Even if the USSR did have evidence, who would listen to it or believe it at the time? In the US in the 1960's, due to McCarthyism, it was illegal to buy, sell or even discuss material supposedly originating from the USSR. There was just one international telephone line out of the USSR, closely monitored by the KGB, news sources were all under government control and even shortwave radio broadcasts were monitored.

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Another common belief is that you can see the original lunar landing site with a telescope. Not true. There is no telescope powerful enough to see equipment left on the surface of the moon.

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

There are mirrors on the surface of the moon that you can bounce lasers off of to measure the distance. They were first put there in 1969.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otsossieMan  over a year ago

Chesterfield


"Another common belief is that you can see the original lunar landing site with a telescope. Not true. There is no telescope powerful enough to see equipment left on the surface of the moon.

Bess x"

Not from Earth, but they can from lunar orbit.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Another common belief is that you can see the original lunar landing site with a telescope. Not true. There is no telescope powerful enough to see equipment left on the surface of the moon.

Bess x"

No Earth based telescope.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hunky GentMan  over a year ago

Maldon and Peterborough

Of course they did.

I've tasted the cheese they brought back.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *otsossieMan  over a year ago

Chesterfield

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I've seen For All Mankind. Russians got there first. North Korea beat them both to Mars.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hil most chillMan  over a year ago

South East & Europe

You guys believe the moon is real? You need to up your conspiracy theorist game

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"There are mirrors on the surface of the moon that you can bounce lasers off of to measure the distance. They were first put there in 1969.

"

On May 9, 1962, MIT researchers successfully bounced a laser off the Moon for the first time. No mirrors needed then.

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *batMan  over a year ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)

There is so much evidence to prove they did.

Gbat

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"There are mirrors on the surface of the moon that you can bounce lasers off of to measure the distance. They were first put there in 1969.

On May 9, 1962, MIT researchers successfully bounced a laser off the Moon for the first time. No mirrors needed then.

Bess x"

Which doesn’t disprove the fact that men placed mirrors on the moon in 1969

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

So people that claim is was faked think that some dweebs on YouTube have figured it out but China and Russia, who would be falling over themselves to get one over USA, haven’t managed to prove its fake yet? Give your head a wobble.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *TG3Man  over a year ago

Dorchester


"I'm going to go with yes. But I'm normally on the side of fact.you'd need to be there to know it happened

No you wouldn't.how could you be sure otherwise

Do you only believe things to be true if you've seen them with your own eyes? Must be tough to get by."

Well how do you believe it then, seeing is believing

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Ohhh Feisty

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"There are mirrors on the surface of the moon that you can bounce lasers off of to measure the distance. They were first put there in 1969.

On May 9, 1962, MIT researchers successfully bounced a laser off the Moon for the first time. No mirrors needed then.

Bess x

Which doesn’t disprove the fact that men placed mirrors on the moon in 1969"

You're right, it doesn't. But it is possible that the mirrors were sent down remotely from the orbital vehicle - this technology existed at the time.

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *batMan  over a year ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)


"IWell how do you believe it then, seeing is believing "

I’ve never seen you, but I believe you exist.

I’ve never seen Moscow, but I believe it exists.

Do I need to go on?

Gbat

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"There are mirrors on the surface of the moon that you can bounce lasers off of to measure the distance. They were first put there in 1969.

"

China and Russia also have these mirrors on the moon.

And I do believe the moon landings happened.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Did they yes or No ? "

Yes they did!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lym4realCouple  over a year ago

plymouth

Nope...Mrs4 Aunties friends sisters ex boyfriend knows someone who worked for NASA and it was all fake and plus we dod our research ....xxxx ps but they did really xx

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ou only live onceMan  over a year ago

London


"I'm going to go with yes. But I'm normally on the side of fact.you'd need to be there to know it happened

No you wouldn't.how could you be sure otherwise

Do you only believe things to be true if you've seen them with your own eyes? Must be tough to get by.Well how do you believe it then, seeing is believing "

That was my question to you. Do you only believe things you have physically seen/witnessed? What about all the other events you didn't personally witness. Are they all up for debate? All that constant research before yoy know something is true must be exhausting.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"There are mirrors on the surface of the moon that you can bounce lasers off of to measure the distance. They were first put there in 1969.

China and Russia also have these mirrors on the moon.

And I do believe the moon landings happened."

The USSR (at the time, and unmanned missions) and the Americans have placed retroreflectors on the lunar surface, I don't think the Chinese have. India and Israel attempted the same in 2019, both missions failed and the remote vehicles crashed on the surface.

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If they didn't there were an awful lot of people in on the hoax "

The Soviet Union for instance, who tracked the whole mission as well

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *aitonelMan  over a year ago

Away for Christmas

The thing is like with a lot of events, there is always room for F reasonable doubt. Some people really scrap the bottom of the bucket for "excuses" it didn't happen. Some are quite rational (Bess has made a few).

Despite this the evidence for it, for me, simply out weights all the against, especially the weaker arguments that tend to be plucked out.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 18/08/23 15:03:16]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If they didn't there were an awful lot of people in on the hoax

The Soviet Union for instance, who tracked the whole mission as well "

They said they did, but how do you know it's true? The USSR were masters of mis-information, lies and propaganda during the Cold War, as were the Americans. The Russians are still pretty good at it. Information released to the western world from the USSR in the 1960's was very carefully monitored by the KGB.

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The thing is like with a lot of events, there is always room for F reasonable doubt. Some people really scrap the bottom of the bucket for "excuses" it didn't happen. Some are quite rational (Bess has made a few).

Despite this the evidence for it, for me, simply out weights all the against, especially the weaker arguments that tend to be plucked out. "

I agree with your summation, but every piece of information that's out there can be traced back as originating from very few reliable sources. The US military don't give out their secrets readily. Every bit of telemetry and information received by mission control in 1969 was routed through external sources, and very low tech.

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *batMan  over a year ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)

I'm hoping mankind will be back on the moon in the not too distant future. They will be able to show contemporary pics of the Apollo artefacts.

Gbat

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I'm hoping mankind will be back on the moon in the not too distant future. They will be able to show contemporary pics of the Apollo artefacts.

Gbat "

They certainly will What they won't be able to do is prove exactly when the artifacts were left, or placed there. I'm not a conspiracy nut, honest guv - I just believe in healthy scepticism concerning the US and Russia/USSR

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inky_couple2020Couple  over a year ago

North West


"More difficult to fake it than do it. Had it been faked the Soviets would have taken great pleasure in providing evidence of it. "

Exactly. And all the probably thousands of people in on the "conspiracy" keeping totally schtum? Nah.

See also: Area 51 and alien shizz

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

How many people believed in the lemming suicide myth until it was proven that the "evidence" (a Disney documentary in 1958) was faked? Disney employed around a quarter of a million people at the time, all subject to contractual non-disclosure clauses. I don't think it was difficult at the time to fool so many people, given the lack of sources of reliable information. Not so now, of course.

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hil most chillMan  over a year ago

South East & Europe


"How many people believed in the lemming suicide myth until it was proven that the "evidence" (a Disney documentary in 1958) was faked? Disney employed around a quarter of a million people at the time, all subject to contractual non-disclosure clauses. I don't think it was difficult at the time to fool so many people, given the lack of sources of reliable information. Not so now, of course.

Bess x"

The videogame didn't exactly help either

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *aitonelMan  over a year ago

Away for Christmas


"How many people believed in the lemming suicide myth until it was proven that the "evidence" (a Disney documentary in 1958) was faked? Disney employed around a quarter of a million people at the time, all subject to contractual non-disclosure clauses. I don't think it was difficult at the time to fool so many people, given the lack of sources of reliable information. Not so now, of course.

Bess x"

That never really made sense to me even as a child to be fair. Instinctual self killing for no reason

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

No, otherwise surely with the advancement of technology and materials they/we would have visited since? And maybe other planets/moons Mars doesn’t count before anyone pipes up

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hawn ScottMan  over a year ago

london Brixton


"I'm hoping mankind will be back on the moon in the not too distant future. They will be able to show contemporary pics of the Apollo artefacts.

Gbat "

Like any conspiracy theory it would need so many people to be in on it that it would be impossible to keep it secret. The reason the USA never returned as it nearly bankrupted the country and the moon has nothing to offer us. We can't build or live on the moon due to its surface and temperatures so landing on it again would be pointless

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"How many people believed in the lemming suicide myth until it was proven that the "evidence" (a Disney documentary in 1958) was faked? Disney employed around a quarter of a million people at the time, all subject to contractual non-disclosure clauses. I don't think it was difficult at the time to fool so many people, given the lack of sources of reliable information. Not so now, of course.

Bess x

That never really made sense to me even as a child to be fair. Instinctual self killing for no reason "

I agree with you, but many people believed it to be true, I guess because they had no other evidence to the contrary available to them at the time.

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Of course they did!

...Then (sadly) they lost the 'technology' (all 70-odd kilobytes of it).

'They' must be so thankful most of the world is insane and beyond thick or they'd never have been able to pull such things off.

Well done folks. - You are a joy to share the plane with

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I'm hoping mankind will be back on the moon in the not too distant future. They will be able to show contemporary pics of the Apollo artefacts.

Gbat

Like any conspiracy theory it would need so many people to be in on it that it would be impossible to keep it secret. The reason the USA never returned as it nearly bankrupted the country and the moon has nothing to offer us. We can't build or live on the moon due to its surface and temperatures so landing on it again would be pointless "

It could be potentially useful as a base for launching vehicles to travel further out into space. The vast majority of the fuel consumed by contemporary craft is used up to escape Earth's atmosphere.

Bess x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Mind you... They did bring back proof didn't they? - 'Moon rocks' and stuff...

...Oh wait they all turned out to be fake.

Mind you...

...Who needs proof these days eh?

...An 'scientific expert' or a 'medical professional' only has to say something like they did in the news today:

"Being too happy kills you."

...And most of you believe it.

Never mind though... At least it's' been the hottest July EVER on record this year eh? - Remember that blistering heat we had for... A hour or two? (I must have missed it)... We can be thankful for that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *batMan  over a year ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)


"They did bring back proof didn't they? - 'Moon rocks' and stuff...

...Oh wait they all turned out to be fake. "

Why do you think they were all fake? What makes you say that?


"At least it's been the hottest July EVER on record this year eh? - Remember that blistering heat we had for... A hour or two? (I must have missed it)."

It was fucking boiling here in southern Spain. Temperatures in the mid 40s for more than a few days. You did miss it.

Are you saying that because you personally didn't think it was too warm where you were, then global warming is made up? Lots of organisations keep records of what the weather was like. Have a look at a variety of those and see what they say. Or are they all in on the big conspiracy?

Gbat

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inky_couple2020Couple  over a year ago

North West


"They did bring back proof didn't they? - 'Moon rocks' and stuff...

...Oh wait they all turned out to be fake.

Why do you think they were all fake? What makes you say that?

At least it's been the hottest July EVER on record this year eh? - Remember that blistering heat we had for... A hour or two? (I must have missed it).

It was fucking boiling here in southern Spain. Temperatures in the mid 40s for more than a few days. You did miss it.

Are you saying that because you personally didn't think it was too warm where you were, then global warming is made up? Lots of organisations keep records of what the weather was like. Have a look at a variety of those and see what they say. Or are they all in on the big conspiracy?

Gbat

"

46°C in Granada when I was there

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"They did bring back proof didn't they? - 'Moon rocks' and stuff...

...Oh wait they all turned out to be fake.

Why do you think they were all fake? What makes you say that?

At least it's been the hottest July EVER on record this year eh? - Remember that blistering heat we had for... A hour or two? (I must have missed it).

It was fucking boiling here in southern Spain. Temperatures in the mid 40s for more than a few days. You did miss it.

Are you saying that because you personally didn't think it was too warm where you were, then global warming is made up? Lots of organisations keep records of what the weather was like. Have a look at a variety of those and see what they say. Or are they all in on the big conspiracy?

Gbat

"

"Temperatures in the mid 40s for more than a few days"...

...Well you ARE in Spain...

What did you expect?

40's isn't 'boiling' lol!

Previous years were hotter according to people I know over there.

... You folks are so determined to defend your lies.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"They did bring back proof didn't they? - 'Moon rocks' and stuff...

...Oh wait they all turned out to be fake.

Why do you think they were all fake? What makes you say that?

At least it's been the hottest July EVER on record this year eh? - Remember that blistering heat we had for... A hour or two? (I must have missed it).

It was fucking boiling here in southern Spain. Temperatures in the mid 40s for more than a few days. You did miss it.

Are you saying that because you personally didn't think it was too warm where you were, then global warming is made up? Lots of organisations keep records of what the weather was like. Have a look at a variety of those and see what they say. Or are they all in on the big conspiracy?

Gbat

46°C in Granada when I was there "

The last three previous years were hotter on average in Granada, just checked.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Sometimes I think some of you folks come from the moon...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

They developed vaccines there. It's real.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Anyway I'm off before I get banned again for telling the truth.

Good luck... We will see how far your 'intelligence' gets you over the coming years.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Anyway I'm off before I get banned again for telling the truth.

Good luck... We will see how far your 'intelligence' gets you over the coming years. "

I see a lot of shouting and passive aggressive derogatory remarks, but absolutely no sustenance to justify your stance (Shrugs)

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *uddy laneMan  over a year ago

dudley

Who cares it's been sold off piece by piece.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *TG3Man  over a year ago

Dorchester


"IWell how do you believe it then, seeing is believing

I’ve never seen you, but I believe you exist.

I’ve never seen Moscow, but I believe it exists.

Do I need to go on?

Gbat "

I may be AI

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *aitonelMan  over a year ago

Away for Christmas


"Anyway I'm off before I get banned again for telling the truth.

Good luck... We will see how far your 'intelligence' gets you over the coming years.

I see a lot of shouting and passive aggressive derogatory remarks, but absolutely no sustenance to justify your stance (Shrugs)"

It is a common trait among CTs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ent in BlackMan  over a year ago

Silsden

Can the forum mods create a conspiracy section please.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *olarbear73Man  over a year ago

Glasgow

Yes

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Anyway I'm off before I get banned again for telling the truth.

Good luck... We will see how far your 'intelligence' gets you over the coming years.

I see a lot of shouting and passive aggressive derogatory remarks, but absolutely no sustenance to justify your stance (Shrugs)

It is a common trait among CTs"

I don't like that term either, it can be used to discredit in order to divert attention in order to silence people.

Though, yes I'm in agreement here.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Can we have a flat earther post too?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hawn ScottMan  over a year ago

london Brixton

Can we have the David Beckham paid of the mortgage of guy I work with, mates, mates, cousin

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ent in BlackMan  over a year ago

Silsden


"Anyway I'm off before I get banned again for telling the truth.

Good luck... We will see how far your 'intelligence' gets you over the coming years.

I see a lot of shouting and passive aggressive derogatory remarks, but absolutely no sustenance to justify your stance (Shrugs)"

Same, absolutely no need to be aggressive, discussion is equal.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

What would be the point in faking it

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I find that most people who go with the narrative either do very little or no research at all.

When you delve into ' did they, didn't they' you'll find that not one or two inconsistencies start to appear, but hundreds and hundreds. Bart Sibrel was the guy who buzz punched for not placing his hand on the bible and swearing he went to the moon. Most, if not all the apollo astronauts were religious and Bart payed them all a visit. Not one of them would place their hand on the bible.

Bart also made a documentary called 'A funny thing happened on the way to the moon'. Some of it eye opening.

For me, No, they didn't land on the moon.

But that's my researched opinion.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Anyway I'm off before I get banned again for telling the truth.

Good luck... We will see how far your 'intelligence' gets you over the coming years.

I see a lot of shouting and passive aggressive derogatory remarks, but absolutely no sustenance to justify your stance (Shrugs)

Same, absolutely no need to be aggressive, discussion is equal."

I wasn't aggressive once.

Put ya money where ya mouf is...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Where in moondust did I say anything 'agressive'.

I think that you two just don't have a debate so you twist everything 'round.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *egWorshipperMan  over a year ago

Gods Country

[Removed by poster at 18/08/23 18:22:01]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Where in moondust did I say anything 'agressive'.

I think that you two just don't have a debate so you twist everything 'round.

"

I stated passive aggressive.

You have offered absolutely no debate whatsoever.

Only taken 'passive aggressive' digs towards anyone you deem to have a different opinion to you, and yet offered no opinion of your own.

No debate, just passive aggressive behaviour.

What's actually your viewpoint on the subject?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Where in moondust did I say anything 'agressive'.

I think that you two just don't have a debate so you twist everything 'round.

I stated passive aggressive.

You have offered absolutely no debate whatsoever.

Only taken 'passive aggressive' digs towards anyone you deem to have a different opinion to you, and yet offered no opinion of your own.

No debate, just passive aggressive behaviour.

What's actually your viewpoint on the subject?"

Yawn.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Passive agressive lol.

Oh stop the world I wana get off lol.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I'm just trying to imagine someone coming up to me in the street saying:

"Excuse me, but if you don't mind, I find you to be very 'passive agressive'!"

I know what would happen to his fingers lol.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *tylebender03Man  over a year ago

Manchester

The first moon landing was staged so that America could win the space race over Russia during the Cold War. It was filmed in Hollywood by Stanley Kubrick and he left clues in the film The Shining

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The first moon landing was staged so that America could win the space race over Russia during the Cold War. It was filmed in Hollywood by Stanley Kubrick and he left clues in the film The Shining "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I'm just trying to imagine someone coming up to me in the street saying:

"Excuse me, but if you don't mind, I find you to be very 'passive agressive'!"

I know what would happen to his fingers lol."

Yeah sure

Well aren't you a great debater eh.

Absolutely nothing to share but passive aggressive, now bordering aggressive nonsense.

Weak!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I'm just trying to imagine someone coming up to me in the street saying:

"Excuse me, but if you don't mind, I find you to be very 'passive agressive'!"

I know what would happen to his fingers lol.

Yeah sure

Well aren't you a great debater eh.

Absolutely nothing to share but passive aggressive, now bordering aggressive nonsense.

Weak!"

And you 'have' contributed? - All you have done is call me names... Several times... For absolutely no reason. I asked you to point out where I showed any 'aggression' and you can't... Not even this 'passive agression' you seem to relish speaking of.

If they even DO build anything that can get to the moon I would like to volunteer you to be first on board since you must really like it and I like you so much.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

You could start by building your own lunar spaceshippy thing... Do you have any celltape and tinfoil? Curtain rods?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I'm just trying to imagine someone coming up to me in the street saying:

"Excuse me, but if you don't mind, I find you to be very 'passive agressive'!"

I know what would happen to his fingers lol.

Yeah sure

Well aren't you a great debater eh.

Absolutely nothing to share but passive aggressive, now bordering aggressive nonsense.

Weak!

And you 'have' contributed? - All you have done is call me names... Several times... For absolutely no reason. I asked you to point out where I showed any 'aggression' and you can't... Not even this 'passive agression' you seem to relish speaking of.

If they even DO build anything that can get to the moon I would like to volunteer you to be first on board since you must really like it and I like you so much. "

Read through your own responses, if you don't see the problem, you have a problem.

All you've contributed to this debate is to point fingers, passively aggressively suggesting a lack of intelligence, rather than add your viewpoint.

That suggests fear that you're own opinion does not stand strong.

I've actually added more to the debate than you by stating I dislike the term 'conspiracy theorists'.

Come on, share your opinion on the subject, I dare you.

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

I don't exactly trust anything that comes out of America, if I'm honest.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 18/08/23 19:07:58]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

"

So... You have looked into something that isn't important to you (so why bother?_ but you have an interest in it...

...Um... Ok.

Yeah let's just leave it there.

... I'll let you get back to watching button moon.

I can have more interesting conversations talking to my kettle.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *penbicoupleCouple  over a year ago

Northampton


"Who cares it's been sold off piece by piece.

"

Apparently, it's gonna be a LIDL car park.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *layer oneMan  over a year ago

mirfield

Fake

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *tsJustKateWoman  over a year ago

London

The fact that The Russians have never said that it didn't happen is proof enough for me!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I don't exactly trust anything that comes out of America, if I'm honest. "

Sounds agressive.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I don't exactly trust anything that comes out of America, if I'm honest.

Sounds agressive."

it is. But hey keep buying our military equipment greatly appreciated.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ympho7Couple  over a year ago

swansea

you can see footsteps and leftovers through a big telescope, how did they fake that?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *rumpyMcFuckNuggetMan  over a year ago

Den of Iniquity


"

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

So... You have looked into something that isn't important to you (so why bother?_ but you have an interest in it...

...Um... Ok.

Yeah let's just leave it there.

... I'll let you get back to watching button moon.

I can have more interesting conversations talking to my kettle.

"

I follow Mr.Spoon

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"you can see footsteps and leftovers through a big telescope, how did they fake that?"

Oh yeh... the ever-changing footprints that don't match lol.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *obyn GravesTV/TS  over a year ago

1127 walnut avenue


"You could start by building your own lunar spaceshippy thing... Do you have any celltape and tinfoil? Curtain rods?"

Tape...? bleeding tape.?.are you completely mad...? that would never hold it all together..you need a tube of sticks like sh*t..the all weather adhesive.. I'd also replace the tin foil with flattened out baked bean cans..any brand will do.. curtain rods would also be liable to bend with the force of leaving the earth's atmosphere.. scaffolding poles would be far better.. hope this helps..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

So... You have looked into something that isn't important to you (so why bother?_ but you have an interest in it...

...Um... Ok.

Yeah let's just leave it there.

... I'll let you get back to watching button moon.

I can have more interesting conversations talking to my kettle.

I follow Mr.Spoon "

Could do a lot worse than Mr Spoon tbh

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You could start by building your own lunar spaceshippy thing... Do you have any celltape and tinfoil? Curtain rods?

Tape...? bleeding tape.?.are you completely mad...? that would never hold it all together..you need a tube of sticks like sh*t..the all weather adhesive.. I'd also replace the tin foil with flattened out baked bean cans..any brand will do.. curtain rods would also be liable to bend with the force of leaving the earth's atmosphere.. scaffolding poles would be far better.. hope this helps.."

I had no idea you were a NASA scientist?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central

Yes. Global hoax, involving enemies and thousands of people for decades is more impossible.

We measure live the actual distance from the moon to us, by shining light at the equipment we left there, that's visible now.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *elshcouple18Couple  over a year ago

Cardiff

Why hasn't anyone done it since? I5s a no from us..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Why hasn't anyone done it since? I5s a no from us.. "

Nasa stated they (cough)... lost the technology.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"you can see footsteps and leftovers through a big telescope, how did they fake that?"

Who has this big telescope?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Yes. Global hoax, involving enemies and thousands of people for decades is more impossible.

We measure live the actual distance from the moon to us, by shining light at the equipment we left there, that's visible now. "

Change enemies to 'comrades'.

Change people to 'idiots'.

And then you might be able to grasp how they accomplished it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Nasa stated they (cough)... lost the technology."

They've also stated that they've lost the whole apollo mission films.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"you can see footsteps and leftovers through a big telescope, how did they fake that?

Who has this big telescope? "

And they call others tinfoil hat wearers...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

So... You have looked into something that isn't important to you (so why bother?_ but you have an interest in it...

...Um... Ok.

Yeah let's just leave it there.

... I'll let you get back to watching button moon.

I can have more interesting conversations talking to my kettle.

"

And still no sustenance.

You've attacked, denied accountability, refused to offer an opinion whilst suggestively rubbishing others.

I've dealt with this narcissistic nonsense for the past six years, he doesn't understand passive aggressive either, in get behaves exactly like you.

Just an observation.

I'm done trying to debate with you, as you simply don't have it in you.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Nasa stated they (cough)... lost the technology.

They've also stated that they've lost the whole apollo mission films. "

Yeah... Thousands of hours and tapes of man's greatest achievement. Lol.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

So... You have looked into something that isn't important to you (so why bother?_ but you have an interest in it...

...Um... Ok.

Yeah let's just leave it there.

... I'll let you get back to watching button moon.

I can have more interesting conversations talking to my kettle.

And still no sustenance.

You've attacked, denied accountability, refused to offer an opinion whilst suggestively rubbishing others.

I've dealt with this narcissistic nonsense for the past six years, he doesn't understand passive aggressive either, in get behaves exactly like you.

Just an observation.

I'm done trying to debate with you, as you simply don't have it in you.

"

...Trying to work out what you said...

"Suggestively rubbishing others"... You say?

...Ok whatever that means...

"Narcissistic?" You say?

...Do you even know what that means? (Don't try to tell me (I know you don't)).

"In get behaves exactly like you".

...Nope you've lost me there again...

Anyway... Nice to see you were not narcistically-agressive towards Americans this time

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

So... You have looked into something that isn't important to you (so why bother?_ but you have an interest in it...

...Um... Ok.

Yeah let's just leave it there.

... I'll let you get back to watching button moon.

I can have more interesting conversations talking to my kettle.

And still no sustenance.

You've attacked, denied accountability, refused to offer an opinion whilst suggestively rubbishing others.

I've dealt with this narcissistic nonsense for the past six years, he doesn't understand passive aggressive either, in get behaves exactly like you.

Just an observation.

I'm done trying to debate with you, as you simply don't have it in you.

...Trying to work out what you said...

"Suggestively rubbishing others"... You say?

...Ok whatever that means...

"Narcissistic?" You say?

...Do you even know what that means? (Don't try to tell me (I know you don't)).

"In get behaves exactly like you".

...Nope you've lost me there again...

Anyway... Nice to see you were not narcistically-agressive towards Americans this time"

For ', in get' read 'and he' . Typos due to swipe text, I really need to proofread.

You've deflected, twisted the words of others, rubbishing others beliefs to the point of belittling them, whilst you haven't got the nerve to express your own beliefs.

Now you act dumb to avoid accountability again.

Yup, red flags galore.

Still, not brave enough to offer an actual opinion, feared your viewpoint will be treated the same way as you've treated others.

Oh there's another one. (Shrugs)

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hagTonightMan  over a year ago

From the land of haribos.

[Removed by poster at 18/08/23 19:52:07]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hagTonightMan  over a year ago

From the land of haribos.


"you can see footsteps and leftovers through a big telescope, how did they fake that?"
I actually wonder if the footsteps still are intact there if it happened, because the moon gets periodically "sandblasted" by intense solar storms that can strip tons of material from the lunar surface

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

So... You have looked into something that isn't important to you (so why bother?_ but you have an interest in it...

...Um... Ok.

Yeah let's just leave it there.

... I'll let you get back to watching button moon.

I can have more interesting conversations talking to my kettle.

And still no sustenance.

You've attacked, denied accountability, refused to offer an opinion whilst suggestively rubbishing others.

I've dealt with this narcissistic nonsense for the past six years, he doesn't understand passive aggressive either, in get behaves exactly like you.

Just an observation.

I'm done trying to debate with you, as you simply don't have it in you.

...Trying to work out what you said...

"Suggestively rubbishing others"... You say?

...Ok whatever that means...

"Narcissistic?" You say?

...Do you even know what that means? (Don't try to tell me (I know you don't)).

"In get behaves exactly like you".

...Nope you've lost me there again...

Anyway... Nice to see you were not narcistically-agressive towards Americans this time

For ', in get' read 'and he' . Typos due to swipe text, I really need to proofread.

You've deflected, twisted the words of others, rubbishing others beliefs to the point of belittling them, whilst you haven't got the nerve to express your own beliefs.

Now you act dumb to avoid accountability again.

Yup, red flags galore.

Still, not brave enough to offer an actual opinion, feared your viewpoint will be treated the same way as you've treated others.

Oh there's another one. (Shrugs)"

Hey... Cheer up... It's been the warmest July EVER! What's to be sad about?

Oh... But don't laugh too much because too much happiness can kill you nowadays (it was in the news today). (The same 'scientific experts' you trust.

Byeeeee.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"you can see footsteps and leftovers through a big telescope, how did they fake that?I actually wonder if the footsteps still are intact there if it happened, because the moon gets periodically "sandblasted" by intense solar storms that can strip tons of material from the lunar surface "

You can't seriously believe that intense solar storms on a crappy dusty (and totally fake) surface can get rid of a very lightly touched (low gravity) footprint can you???

Whoa you tinfoil-hatter! - I bet you dont drink tap water cos of fluoride, and think nanobots are everywhere and the earth is flat... and... and... 911... and and Diana... and...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

So... You have looked into something that isn't important to you (so why bother?_ but you have an interest in it...

...Um... Ok.

Yeah let's just leave it there.

... I'll let you get back to watching button moon.

I can have more interesting conversations talking to my kettle.

And still no sustenance.

You've attacked, denied accountability, refused to offer an opinion whilst suggestively rubbishing others.

I've dealt with this narcissistic nonsense for the past six years, he doesn't understand passive aggressive either, in get behaves exactly like you.

Just an observation.

I'm done trying to debate with you, as you simply don't have it in you.

...Trying to work out what you said...

"Suggestively rubbishing others"... You say?

...Ok whatever that means...

"Narcissistic?" You say?

...Do you even know what that means? (Don't try to tell me (I know you don't)).

"In get behaves exactly like you".

...Nope you've lost me there again...

Anyway... Nice to see you were not narcistically-agressive towards Americans this time

For ', in get' read 'and he' . Typos due to swipe text, I really need to proofread.

You've deflected, twisted the words of others, rubbishing others beliefs to the point of belittling them, whilst you haven't got the nerve to express your own beliefs.

Now you act dumb to avoid accountability again.

Yup, red flags galore.

Still, not brave enough to offer an actual opinion, feared your viewpoint will be treated the same way as you've treated others.

Oh there's another one. (Shrugs)

Hey... Cheer up... It's been the warmest July EVER! What's to be sad about?

Oh... But don't laugh too much because too much happiness can kill you nowadays (it was in the news today). (The same 'scientific experts' you trust.

Byeeeee.

"

Still avoidance.

Absolutely no nerve to share your opinions on this, have you?

Just here to belittle others viewpoints.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

So... You have looked into something that isn't important to you (so why bother?_ but you have an interest in it...

...Um... Ok.

Yeah let's just leave it there.

... I'll let you get back to watching button moon.

I can have more interesting conversations talking to my kettle.

And still no sustenance.

You've attacked, denied accountability, refused to offer an opinion whilst suggestively rubbishing others.

I've dealt with this narcissistic nonsense for the past six years, he doesn't understand passive aggressive either, in get behaves exactly like you.

Just an observation.

I'm done trying to debate with you, as you simply don't have it in you.

...Trying to work out what you said...

"Suggestively rubbishing others"... You say?

...Ok whatever that means...

"Narcissistic?" You say?

...Do you even know what that means? (Don't try to tell me (I know you don't)).

"In get behaves exactly like you".

...Nope you've lost me there again...

Anyway... Nice to see you were not narcistically-agressive towards Americans this time

For ', in get' read 'and he' . Typos due to swipe text, I really need to proofread.

You've deflected, twisted the words of others, rubbishing others beliefs to the point of belittling them, whilst you haven't got the nerve to express your own beliefs.

Now you act dumb to avoid accountability again.

Yup, red flags galore.

Still, not brave enough to offer an actual opinion, feared your viewpoint will be treated the same way as you've treated others.

Oh there's another one. (Shrugs)

Hey... Cheer up... It's been the warmest July EVER! What's to be sad about?

Oh... But don't laugh too much because too much happiness can kill you nowadays (it was in the news today). (The same 'scientific experts' you trust.

Byeeeee.

Still avoidance.

Absolutely no nerve to share your opinions on this, have you?

Just here to belittle others viewpoints. "

Careful now... You look a bit happy there... Don't want you keeling over. That's 'expert' advice not mine.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

So... You have looked into something that isn't important to you (so why bother?_ but you have an interest in it...

...Um... Ok.

Yeah let's just leave it there.

... I'll let you get back to watching button moon.

I can have more interesting conversations talking to my kettle.

And still no sustenance.

You've attacked, denied accountability, refused to offer an opinion whilst suggestively rubbishing others.

I've dealt with this narcissistic nonsense for the past six years, he doesn't understand passive aggressive either, in get behaves exactly like you.

Just an observation.

I'm done trying to debate with you, as you simply don't have it in you.

...Trying to work out what you said...

"Suggestively rubbishing others"... You say?

...Ok whatever that means...

"Narcissistic?" You say?

...Do you even know what that means? (Don't try to tell me (I know you don't)).

"In get behaves exactly like you".

...Nope you've lost me there again...

Anyway... Nice to see you were not narcistically-agressive towards Americans this time

For ', in get' read 'and he' . Typos due to swipe text, I really need to proofread.

You've deflected, twisted the words of others, rubbishing others beliefs to the point of belittling them, whilst you haven't got the nerve to express your own beliefs.

Now you act dumb to avoid accountability again.

Yup, red flags galore.

Still, not brave enough to offer an actual opinion, feared your viewpoint will be treated the same way as you've treated others.

Oh there's another one. (Shrugs)

Hey... Cheer up... It's been the warmest July EVER! What's to be sad about?

Oh... But don't laugh too much because too much happiness can kill you nowadays (it was in the news today). (The same 'scientific experts' you trust.

Byeeeee.

Still avoidance.

Absolutely no nerve to share your opinions on this, have you?

Just here to belittle others viewpoints.

Careful now... You look a bit happy there... Don't want you keeling over. That's 'expert' advice not mine."

More diverting.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

So... You have looked into something that isn't important to you (so why bother?_ but you have an interest in it...

...Um... Ok.

Yeah let's just leave it there.

... I'll let you get back to watching button moon.

I can have more interesting conversations talking to my kettle.

And still no sustenance.

You've attacked, denied accountability, refused to offer an opinion whilst suggestively rubbishing others.

I've dealt with this narcissistic nonsense for the past six years, he doesn't understand passive aggressive either, in get behaves exactly like you.

Just an observation.

I'm done trying to debate with you, as you simply don't have it in you.

...Trying to work out what you said...

"Suggestively rubbishing others"... You say?

...Ok whatever that means...

"Narcissistic?" You say?

...Do you even know what that means? (Don't try to tell me (I know you don't)).

"In get behaves exactly like you".

...Nope you've lost me there again...

Anyway... Nice to see you were not narcistically-agressive towards Americans this time

For ', in get' read 'and he' . Typos due to swipe text, I really need to proofread.

You've deflected, twisted the words of others, rubbishing others beliefs to the point of belittling them, whilst you haven't got the nerve to express your own beliefs.

Now you act dumb to avoid accountability again.

Yup, red flags galore.

Still, not brave enough to offer an actual opinion, feared your viewpoint will be treated the same way as you've treated others.

Oh there's another one. (Shrugs)

Hey... Cheer up... It's been the warmest July EVER! What's to be sad about?

Oh... But don't laugh too much because too much happiness can kill you nowadays (it was in the news today). (The same 'scientific experts' you trust.

Byeeeee.

Still avoidance.

Absolutely no nerve to share your opinions on this, have you?

Just here to belittle others viewpoints.

Careful now... You look a bit happy there... Don't want you keeling over. That's 'expert' advice not mine.

More diverting. "

I'm surprised you are still alive with all the joy you've been expressing. 'Experts' said people drop dead from joy... Unless you are just pretending to be happy?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Anyone fancy a cuppa?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *penbicoupleCouple  over a year ago

Northampton


"Bart Sibrel was the guy who buzz punched for not placing his hand on the bible and swearing he went to the moon. Most, if not all the apollo astronauts were religious and Bart payed them all a visit. Not one of them would place their hand on the bible."

Edgar Mitchell placed his hand on the Bible.

Sibrel was actually punched for poking Aldrin and following him round whilst calling him a liar. He also falsely presented himself in order to get the interview in the first place.

Sibrel's now claiming to have a sworn testimony from someone claiming to have been involved in the fake filming and also a letter on the subject from L.B. Johnson. Obviously, he hasn't provided any evidence of them, because it's nonsense.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Anyone fancy a cuppa? "

It doesn't have fluoride in it does it?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Me personally, though I've had a little look into it, from both sides, with both sides making some good claims, I haven't made up my mind, because it's not important to me, though I do hold an interest.

So... You have looked into something that isn't important to you (so why bother?_ but you have an interest in it...

...Um... Ok.

Yeah let's just leave it there.

... I'll let you get back to watching button moon.

I can have more interesting conversations talking to my kettle.

And still no sustenance.

You've attacked, denied accountability, refused to offer an opinion whilst suggestively rubbishing others.

I've dealt with this narcissistic nonsense for the past six years, he doesn't understand passive aggressive either, in get behaves exactly like you.

Just an observation.

I'm done trying to debate with you, as you simply don't have it in you.

...Trying to work out what you said...

"Suggestively rubbishing others"... You say?

...Ok whatever that means...

"Narcissistic?" You say?

...Do you even know what that means? (Don't try to tell me (I know you don't)).

"In get behaves exactly like you".

...Nope you've lost me there again...

Anyway... Nice to see you were not narcistically-agressive towards Americans this time

For ', in get' read 'and he' . Typos due to swipe text, I really need to proofread.

You've deflected, twisted the words of others, rubbishing others beliefs to the point of belittling them, whilst you haven't got the nerve to express your own beliefs.

Now you act dumb to avoid accountability again.

Yup, red flags galore.

Still, not brave enough to offer an actual opinion, feared your viewpoint will be treated the same way as you've treated others.

Oh there's another one. (Shrugs)

Hey... Cheer up... It's been the warmest July EVER! What's to be sad about?

Oh... But don't laugh too much because too much happiness can kill you nowadays (it was in the news today). (The same 'scientific experts' you trust.

Byeeeee.

Still avoidance.

Absolutely no nerve to share your opinions on this, have you?

Just here to belittle others viewpoints.

Careful now... You look a bit happy there... Don't want you keeling over. That's 'expert' advice not mine.

More diverting.

I'm surprised you are still alive with all the joy you've been expressing. 'Experts' said people drop dead from joy... Unless you are just pretending to be happy? "

Still no nerve.

Yes I understand narcisism.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *rumpyMcFuckNuggetMan  over a year ago

Den of Iniquity


"Anyone fancy a cuppa? "

Yorkshire please 1 Sugar

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Anyone fancy a cuppa?

It doesn't have fluoride in it does it?"

Gosh no. As an aside, being born in Croydon in the 80s meant not only did you have fluoride in the tap water but you also had fluoride toothpaste and fluoride drops in your food because parents were told it was good for you. Upshot was that a whole big heap of people, myself included, had either bright white or brown staining on their adult teeth along with very weak teeth

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Anyone fancy a cuppa?

Yorkshire please 1 Sugar "

Coming right up pet

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Anyone fancy a cuppa?

It doesn't have fluoride in it does it?

Gosh no. As an aside, being born in Croydon in the 80s meant not only did you have fluoride in the tap water but you also had fluoride toothpaste and fluoride drops in your food because parents were told it was good for you. Upshot was that a whole big heap of people, myself included, had either bright white or brown staining on their adult teeth along with very weak teeth "

Reminds me of when they used to spray people with DDT, Johsons asbestos powder etc etc. Gotta love these experts looking out for everyone.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hetalkingstoveMan  over a year ago

London

The moon landings being faked is one of the stupidest conspiracy theories, which really says a lot.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Dr's recommend camel! Smokers are healthier than non smokers!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The moon landings being faked is one of the stupidest conspiracy theories, which really says a lot."

Well it must be if you used such a convincing argument as that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I shudder at the thought of how many hours that man has studied the subject.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hetalkingstoveMan  over a year ago

London


"The moon landings being faked is one of the stupidest conspiracy theories, which really says a lot.

Well it must be if you used such a convincing argument as that."

That you can't tell the difference between an argument and a statement of opinion says a lot.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The moon landings being faked is one of the stupidest conspiracy theories, which really says a lot.

Well it must be if you used such a convincing argument as that.

That you can't tell the difference between an argument and a statement of opinion says a lot."

Could someone scratch my bum?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *mf123Man  over a year ago

with one foot out the door

No idea i wasnt there to see it i have seen moon sized boobs tho waiting to smush heads so i suppose its possible

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *rumpyMcFuckNuggetMan  over a year ago

Den of Iniquity


"Dr's recommend camel! Smokers are healthier than non smokers!

"

I've only tried the toe

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Edgar Mitchell placed his hand on the Bible.

"

Actually, yes, i'm corrected.

But then he was assaulted, thrown out of the house, and you can hear the son asking if he should make a phone call to have sibrel whacked.

Sibrel is a journalist and reporter. You have to play them at their own game to get somewhere.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I shudder at the thought of how many hours that man has studied the subject."

Just what I thought.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Rational sane people (like me) in the past would have been telling the folks of their day:

"Don't smoke cigarettes! - It's bad for you! IT'S SO OBVIOUS THAT INHALING SMOKE ALL DAY ISN'T A GOOD IDEA!!!"

And we would have been told:

"Oh shut up! - The science experts and medical doctors said it was safe, what do you know? - Do you have a medical degree? The government would never approve something that would harm us because they love us! You dumb tinfoil hatter."

And we'd say:-

"Noooo!!! You can't spray folk with DDT!!! IT'S DANGEROUS!!!"

And the people of the time (who 'trust the science' (that says men are women (etc etc))) would say:-

"Who the hell do you think you are?! - You'll kill people with your insanity! - Stand over their and let us spray you before you kill someone!"

You never learn.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

"How you suffered for your sanity

How you tried to set them free".

- Vincent.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *penbicoupleCouple  over a year ago

Northampton


"

Edgar Mitchell placed his hand on the Bible.

Actually, yes, i'm corrected.

But then he was assaulted, thrown out of the house, and you can hear the son asking if he should make a phone call to have sibrel whacked.

Sibrel is a journalist and reporter. You have to play them at their own game to get somewhere.

"

Any sources to verify that Mitchell's son said that? Sibrel actually claims the question was over whether he should arrange for the CIA to assassinate him, which is ridiculous.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hetalkingstoveMan  over a year ago

London


"I shudder at the thought of how many hours that man has studied the subject.

Just what I thought. "

Every silly "moon landing was fake" argument has been completely debunked. It actually doesn't take many hours of study to know that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

This was fun

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Yes

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Edgar Mitchell placed his hand on the Bible.

Actually, yes, i'm corrected.

But then he was assaulted, thrown out of the house, and you can hear the son asking if he should make a phone call to have sibrel whacked.

Sibrel is a journalist and reporter. You have to play them at their own game to get somewhere.

Any sources to verify that Mitchell's son said that? Sibrel actually claims the question was over whether he should arrange for the CIA to assassinate him, which is ridiculous."

It is heard in the video clip when Sibrel visited their house. As he was getting or in the car, it can be clearly heard.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *penbicoupleCouple  over a year ago

Northampton


"It is heard in the video clip when Sibrel visited their house. As he was getting or in the car, it can be clearly heard."

In 'funny thing'? I don't remember that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Every silly "moon landing was fake" argument has been completely debunked. It actually doesn't take many hours of study to know that."

Silly? means you're not taking this seriously. There are many many questions that you could not answer. Take the blinkers off for a while and see how it really is.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It is heard in the video clip when Sibrel visited their house. As he was getting or in the car, it can be clearly heard.

In 'funny thing'? I don't remember that."

If you've seen the clip where Mitchell puts his hand on the bible, than it's at the end of that same clip.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ulieAndBeefCouple  over a year ago

Manchester-ish

Well.

J

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hetalkingstoveMan  over a year ago

London


"

Every silly "moon landing was fake" argument has been completely debunked. It actually doesn't take many hours of study to know that.

Silly? means you're not taking this seriously. There are many many questions that you could not answer. Take the blinkers off for a while and see how it really is."

I love conspiracy theorists.

It's always about how smart they are and how blind others are.

Almost never about any actual facts or evidence.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Rational sane people (like me) in the past would have been telling the folks of their day:

"Don't smoke cigarettes! - It's bad for you! IT'S SO OBVIOUS THAT INHALING SMOKE ALL DAY ISN'T A GOOD IDEA!!!"

And we would have been told:

"Oh shut up! - The science experts and medical doctors said it was safe, what do you know? - Do you have a medical degree? The government would never approve something that would harm us because they love us! You dumb tinfoil hatter."

And we'd say:-

"Noooo!!! You can't spray folk with DDT!!! IT'S DANGEROUS!!!"

And the people of the time (who 'trust the science' (that says men are women (etc etc))) would say:-

"Who the hell do you think you are?! - You'll kill people with your insanity! - Stand over their and let us spray you before you kill someone!"

You never learn. "

LMFAO, so true

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I've just seen a tweet from @Shabezjr saying that Niburu is passing tonight and it's the end of civilisation so it seems we'll never get to the bottom of it

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *penbicoupleCouple  over a year ago

Northampton


"It is heard in the video clip when Sibrel visited their house. As he was getting or in the car, it can be clearly heard.

In 'funny thing'? I don't remember that.

If you've seen the clip where Mitchell puts his hand on the bible, than it's at the end of that same clip.

"

Just rewatched it. It's on the second film. And it's not at all how Sibrel recounts it.

To be fair, I might threaten to kill someone who lied their way into my family home and acted like he did.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Every silly "moon landing was fake" argument has been completely debunked. It actually doesn't take many hours of study to know that.

Silly? means you're not taking this seriously. There are many many questions that you could not answer. Take the blinkers off for a while and see how it really is.

I love conspiracy theorists.

It's always about how smart they are and how blind others are.

Almost never about any actual facts or evidence."

What facts or evidence are you bringing to the table again??

Or is it just silly nonsence

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *batMan  over a year ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)


"Previous years were hotter according to people I know over there.

... You folks are so determined to defend your lies."

Hey Gurl4boi,

Can you answer my question about why you think the moon rocks were all found to be fake? I'm genuinely interested in any evidence you have.

Re the temperatures, July would usually be in the mid 30s not mid 40s. That's what I expected.

Funnily enough, everyone else here that I spoke to also thought it was sweltering. You know how the conversations go, even the cashier in the shop tells you it's "mucho calor" while fanning themselves and mock swooning.

Did you just have a spookily convenient recent conversation with your Spanish "friends" about average temperatures in July or did you rush to canvass their opinions after the thread diverted from Moon Conspiracy to Climate Conspiracy?

Let me know,

Gbat

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hetalkingstoveMan  over a year ago

London


"

Every silly "moon landing was fake" argument has been completely debunked. It actually doesn't take many hours of study to know that.

Silly? means you're not taking this seriously. There are many many questions that you could not answer. Take the blinkers off for a while and see how it really is.

I love conspiracy theorists.

It's always about how smart they are and how blind others are.

Almost never about any actual facts or evidence.

What facts or evidence are you bringing to the table again??

Or is it just silly nonsence "

There's literal moon rock that has been verified in labs around the world. It would need a regularly enforced international conspiracy to account for that, including by countries that would love to embarrass the US.

But thanks for proving my point that all conspiracy theorists offer is smugness.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It is heard in the video clip when Sibrel visited their house. As he was getting or in the car, it can be clearly heard.

In 'funny thing'? I don't remember that.

If you've seen the clip where Mitchell puts his hand on the bible, than it's at the end of that same clip.

Just rewatched it. It's on the second film. And it's not at all how Sibrel recounts it.

To be fair, I might threaten to kill someone who lied their way into my family home and acted like he did."

with all due respect, this means that they have someone to report to, to do that for them. Are they protected in some way? If so, why?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

0.2812

0