FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Just stop oil protesters
Just stop oil protesters
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I shouldn't speak on this matter " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation? Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?" Driving a car? You bastard. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation? Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?" What do you crash into? Why is it the fault of the protesters? If you don't know why your responsibilities are as a driver, maybe get some advice before you do drive? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Doesn’t sound like the fault of the protesters. So why would I be mad at them? " There’s a video online of just oil protestors appearing to cause a pregnant women to crash her car. Her partner then gets out of the passenger seat and beats up one of the protestors | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't crash into someone elses car causing them the same misery. I'd brake hard but if that wasn't successful I'd run the fucker over instead, not my fault if they decided to rush into the road in front of a car weighing nearly 2 tonne. Proving a point isn't always clever in the long run! "And you have heated bum seats so I'd be angry too tbf  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Love the video of the JSO protester falling flat on her face after slipping on oil she had poured across the road.Brilliant." I'm trying to find that  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Love the video of the JSO protester falling flat on her face after slipping on oil she had poured across the road.Brilliant. I'm trying to find that "It's been shown on Talk TV (independent republic of Mike Graham) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sooner flatten the useless cunts than crash because of them " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Love the video of the JSO protester falling flat on her face after slipping on oil she had poured across the road.Brilliant." Just seen this. Funny. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Doesn’t sound like the fault of the protesters. So why would I be mad at them? There’s a video online of just oil protestors appearing to cause a pregnant women to crash her car. Her partner then gets out of the passenger seat and beats up one of the protestors" That still doesn't justify violence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Say one thing for JSO at least when they protest they don’t smash up their own community "Who do you think would win in a fight between JSO and JLS ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation? Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?" its happened put in a claim and out of interest how did they make you crash? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What would i use as lube without veg oil" Palm oil | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Say one thing for JSO at least when they protest they don’t smash up their own community
Who do you think would win in a fight between JSO and JLS ?"JLS, as JSO have been trained not to use violence | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"See they were counter protested yesterday. I quite liked the tactics they used. Say one thing for JSO at least when they protest they don’t smash up their own community "No,they damage other communities,spraying orange paint on windows and walls,throwing soup over paintings in at galleries etc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation? Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?" That are a bloody pain, Id run the fuckers over. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Doesn’t sound like the fault of the protesters. So why would I be mad at them? There’s a video online of just oil protestors appearing to cause a pregnant women to crash her car. Her partner then gets out of the passenger seat and beats up one of the protestors" I watched that, while I dont support jso methods, I'm not clear how the accident was caused. Either way, her partners reaction was shocking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read. I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this?" I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road. If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read. I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this? I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road. If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes. " Protesters were in the lanes going the other direction walking very slowly. Again - how is this the fault of protesters? Have you watched the video before commenting even? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read. I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this? I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road. If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes. " I feel like the drivers are at fault here and people are just justifying booting someone on the floor in the head. Which is grim imo. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read. I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this? I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road. If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes. Protesters were in the lanes going the other direction walking very slowly. Again - how is this the fault of protesters? Have you watched the video before commenting even?" Yes I've seen the video. We have no idea what caused the crash, there may have been another vehicle who had pulled round the protestors onto the other side and the crashed cars had to avoid that. Don't question me on whether I've seen something, I wouldn't be commenting had I not  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The answer to most question like this can be solved with a 7.62mm attitude adjuster "Can't be bringing The General (GPMG) to a protest | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"See they were counter protested yesterday. I quite liked the tactics they used. Say one thing for JSO at least when they protest they don’t smash up their own community
No,they damage other communities,spraying orange paint on windows and walls,throwing soup over paintings in at galleries etc"Would it be acceptable to counter their JSO protest of vandalism by going to their houses and spraying their property orange? Their addresses are all readily available as most of the ringleaders have been doxxed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read. I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this? I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road. If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes. Protesters were in the lanes going the other direction walking very slowly. Again - how is this the fault of protesters? Have you watched the video before commenting even? Yes I've seen the video. We have no idea what caused the crash, there may have been another vehicle who had pulled round the protestors onto the other side and the crashed cars had to avoid that. Don't question me on whether I've seen something, I wouldn't be commenting had I not "Oh I didn't realise I wasn't allowed to even ask a question of you. Noted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read. I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this? I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road. If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes. I feel like the drivers are at fault here and people are just justifying booting someone on the floor in the head. Which is grim imo. " The drivers may be at fault. I don't think anyone is 'justifying booting someone on the floor'. I hope you were as vocal a couple of weeks ago when it was the young Tory kicked. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read. I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this? I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road. If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes. I feel like the drivers are at fault here and people are just justifying booting someone on the floor in the head. Which is grim imo. " And more violence promoted in the thread. Does that solve anything at all? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read. I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this? I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road. If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes. Protesters were in the lanes going the other direction walking very slowly. Again - how is this the fault of protesters? Have you watched the video before commenting even? Yes I've seen the video. We have no idea what caused the crash, there may have been another vehicle who had pulled round the protestors onto the other side and the crashed cars had to avoid that. Don't question me on whether I've seen something, I wouldn't be commenting had I not
Oh I didn't realise I wasn't allowed to even ask a question of you. Noted."You can ask any question you like if you lose the patronising tone | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The answer to most question like this can be solved with a 7.62mm attitude adjuster
Can't be bringing The General (GPMG) to a protest "Of course you can,cleans up any the RPG 7 missed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't crash into someone elses car causing them the same misery. I'd brake hard but if that wasn't successful I'd run the fucker over instead, not my fault if they decided to rush into the road in front of a car weighing nearly 2 tonne. Proving a point isn't always clever in the long run! "This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read. I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this? I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road. If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes. Protesters were in the lanes going the other direction walking very slowly. Again - how is this the fault of protesters? Have you watched the video before commenting even? Yes I've seen the video. We have no idea what caused the crash, there may have been another vehicle who had pulled round the protestors onto the other side and the crashed cars had to avoid that. Don't question me on whether I've seen something, I wouldn't be commenting had I not
Oh I didn't realise I wasn't allowed to even ask a question of you. Noted.
You can ask any question you like if you lose the patronising tone "I'd rather just not interact with you, ta. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read. I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this? I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road. If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes. Protesters were in the lanes going the other direction walking very slowly. Again - how is this the fault of protesters? Have you watched the video before commenting even? Yes I've seen the video. We have no idea what caused the crash, there may have been another vehicle who had pulled round the protestors onto the other side and the crashed cars had to avoid that. Don't question me on whether I've seen something, I wouldn't be commenting had I not
Oh I didn't realise I wasn't allowed to even ask a question of you. Noted.
You can ask any question you like if you lose the patronising tone
I'd rather just not interact with you, ta. "Another one? Oh no, I'm devastated | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"JSO protesters move at snail speed. That's the point - so cannot see how a car can crash because of them? " They shouldn’t be on the road. End of. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The answer to most question like this can be solved with a 7.62mm attitude adjuster
Can't be bringing The General (GPMG) to a protest
Of course you can,cleans up any the RPG 7 missed."It's far more fun to bring the brrrrrt from above! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The answer to most question like this can be solved with a 7.62mm attitude adjuster
Can't be bringing The General (GPMG) to a protest
Of course you can,cleans up any the RPG 7 missed.
It's far more fun to bring the brrrrrt from above!"Any "Ugly"call signs? Mr Warthog? Puff the Magic Dragon? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Roadhouse " Plenty of this, though balaclava up first. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation? Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim? That are a bloody pain, Id run the fuckers over." Yeah. Except you wouldn’t, would you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation? Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim? That are a bloody pain, Id run the fuckers over. Yeah. Except you wouldn’t, would you? " One day someone will though, and they'll never shut up about it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" At least the protesters are doing something, not just posting rubbish on a swingers site. " All they are doing it passing people off and turning people against the cause. There are plenty of polls out there from independents to back this up. The majority of people see them as petulant children stamping their feet (at best) the only people that support them are the people already on their side. All in all they are a net negative in the whole thing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" At least the protesters are doing something, not just posting rubbish on a swingers site. All they are doing it passing people off and turning people against the cause. There are plenty of polls out there from independents to back this up. The majority of people see them as petulant children stamping their feet (at best) the only people that support them are the people already on their side. All in all they are a net negative in the whole thing." Completely agree. They do more damage to their cause with every single stunt. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Some amount of clowns claiming they'd drive over protesters. You wouldn't. All mouth and trousers. At least the protesters are doing something, not just posting rubbish on a swingers site. If you feel so strongly against what they're doing then do something about it instead of fantasising. " Why don't JSO do something instead of fantasising and stand for election as an MP?If they are so convinced they are right stand for office.Three by elections yesterday,how many JSO candidates? A clue,none. And for the record yes I would drive over them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Some amount of clowns claiming they'd drive over protesters. You wouldn't. All mouth and trousers. At least the protesters are doing something, not just posting rubbish on a swingers site. If you feel so strongly against what they're doing then do something about it instead of fantasising. Why don't JSO do something instead of fantasising and stand for election as an MP?If they are so convinced they are right stand for office.Three by elections yesterday,how many JSO candidates? A clue,none. And for the record yes I would drive over them." The irony of forcing cars to sit there idling … adding to pollution levels. And then try to ruin tennis, horse racing, art galleries, golf events, and even a recent wedding. Scattergun, poorly thought out shambles of an organisation, doing massive damage to the cause that they think they are supporting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The buggers have attacked the golf" they’ve attacked it!!!!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The buggers have attacked the golf they’ve attacked it!!!!!!" NOT THE GOLF!!! Anything but that! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The buggers have attacked the golf" Damn those golfers and their environmentally unfriendly golfing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation? Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?" Well.. Your crash your fault regardless of whatever politics is unfolding in front of you. As for that group..i have no clue what they think they will achieve.... But i do admire folk who are passionate enough about a cause to get off their arse and do something rather than just moan on a website | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The buggers have attacked the golf Damn those golfers and their environmentally unfriendly golfing " I'd imagine the environmental impact of golf isn't small. Massive amounts of water, chemicals pesticides. Not to mention the impact of a world wide professional tour which is being bought up by *checks notes* middle Eastern money | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The buggers have attacked the golf Damn those golfers and their environmentally unfriendly golfing I'd imagine the environmental impact of golf isn't small. Massive amounts of water, chemicals pesticides. Not to mention the impact of a world wide professional tour which is being bought up by *checks notes* middle Eastern money" What chemicals and pesticides are you referring to? From what I know, the use of pesticides of any sort have been heavily reduced in recent years. And I’m not sure what chemicals you are referring to. I play golf. Active club with over 700 members and a huge junior programme. Pretty positive contribution to the local area rather than another housing estate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's ironic they used a flare with is bad for the environment "Probably used a car to get there too... Or the protest wagon. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The buggers have attacked the golf Damn those golfers and their environmentally unfriendly golfing I'd imagine the environmental impact of golf isn't small. Massive amounts of water, chemicals pesticides. Not to mention the impact of a world wide professional tour which is being bought up by *checks notes* middle Eastern money" Middle eastern money runs most things, if I had that sort of money I'd run most things myself | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's ironic they used a flare with is bad for the environment
Probably used a car to get there too... Or the protest wagon. "Would have taken them a long time to walk at the speed they go if videos are anything to go by | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists " They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's ironic they used a flare with is bad for the environment
Probably used a car to get there too... Or the protest wagon.
Would have taken them a long time to walk at the speed they go if videos are anything to go by " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah? "Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like. "Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's ironic they used a flare with is bad for the environment
Probably used a car to get there too... Or the protest wagon.
Would have taken them a long time to walk at the speed they go if videos are anything to go by "Fair point. And the protest took place at the 17th green. So presumably they worked their way back from the 18th rather than starting at the first, otherwise they would have had to start shuffling on about Tuesday. Probably left the property a bit quicker though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.
Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence. "Inconvenience... Or terrorism... You decide.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.
Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.
Inconvenience... Or terrorism... You decide.. "I think I already did | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.
Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.
Inconvenience... Or terrorism... You decide.. "Wait are the JSO protesters terrorists now? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.
Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence. "I just carry a long piece of rope and I'll tie them all together and then to a lamppost or something after if I ever come across them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.
Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.
Inconvenience... Or terrorism... You decide..
Wait are the JSO protesters terrorists now?"Someone further up said their language was that of terrorists. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.
Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.
I just carry a long piece of rope and I'll tie them all together and then to a lamppost or something after if I ever come across them "Are you handy with rope, then?  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's ironic they used a flare with is bad for the environment
Probably used a car to get there too... Or the protest wagon.
Would have taken them a long time to walk at the speed they go if videos are anything to go by
Fair point. And the protest took place at the 17th green. So presumably they worked their way back from the 18th rather than starting at the first, otherwise they would have had to start shuffling on about Tuesday.
Probably left the property a bit quicker though "They were going to do it at the 18th but they left a day later than planned so wouldn't have made it in time | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.
Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.
Inconvenience... Or terrorism... You decide..
Wait are the JSO protesters terrorists now?
Someone further up said their language was that of terrorists. "Hes a very naughty boy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.
Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.
I just carry a long piece of rope and I'll tie them all together and then to a lamppost or something after if I ever come across them
Are you handy with rope, then? "I am but not doing Shibari on them  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.
Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.
I just carry a long piece of rope and I'll tie them all together and then to a lamppost or something after if I ever come across them
Are you handy with rope, then?
I am but not doing Shibari on them "Damn was about to join JSO! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.
Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.
I just carry a long piece of rope and I'll tie them all together and then to a lamppost or something after if I ever come across them
Are you handy with rope, then?
I am but not doing Shibari on them
Damn was about to join JSO! "If you want your arse dragged across the road by someone then go ahead | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.
Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.
I just carry a long piece of rope and I'll tie them all together and then to a lamppost or something after if I ever come across them
Are you handy with rope, then?
I am but not doing Shibari on them
Damn was about to join JSO!
If you want your arse dragged across the road by someone then go ahead "If there was a chance of Shibari, I bloody would!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah? "Did I say that? No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.
Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.
Inconvenience... Or terrorism... You decide..
Wait are the JSO protesters terrorists now?"I said they use the language of terrorists. They pretend that they have no alternative but to break the law, and justify their law-breaking in that basis. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence. "I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me. "Come on bro.... You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language. Works both ways | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.
Come on bro....
You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.
Works both ways "Please go away | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me. "Terrorists don't "threaten",they do it.Big difference. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.
Terrorists don't "threaten",they do it.Big difference."Please clarify your point? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.
Come on bro....
You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.
Works both ways
Please go away"Isn't this an open forum? You're free to ignore me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.
Come on bro....
You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.
Works both ways
Please go away
Isn't this an open forum?
You're free to ignore me."I'm asking politely for you to not interact with me on the forum. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dammit. Soz. Wrong one." Hate when that happens | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dammit. Soz. Wrong one. Hate when that happens "My life is tragic | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The buggers have attacked the golf Damn those golfers and their environmentally unfriendly golfing I'd imagine the environmental impact of golf isn't small. Massive amounts of water, chemicals pesticides. Not to mention the impact of a world wide professional tour which is being bought up by *checks notes* middle Eastern money" Their main backer and funder owns a football club,wonder how much water,pesticides and chemicals his groundkepers use and where some of the sponsorship/advertising revenue comes from. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me. "How can that be hypocritical? Did I condone violence? No. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.
Come on bro....
You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.
Works both ways
Please go away
Isn't this an open forum?
You're free to ignore me.
I'm asking politely for you to not interact with me on the forum. "From the forum rules: "Don't be personal Personal attacks against other site users aren't allowed, even if you don't name them. If you've got a problem with someone on the site, block them. If you've got a problem with what someone writes on the forum just skip over their messages or report to admin if you think they need to take action." I don't believe I've made a personal attack against you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be a plowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.
Come on bro....
You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.
Works both ways
Please go away
Isn't this an open forum?
You're free to ignore me.
I'm asking politely for you to not interact with me on the forum. "Seriously!!! You think that's going to happen! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.
Terrorists don't "threaten",they do it.Big difference.
Please clarify your point?"The terrorists of 9/11 didn't threaten to blow up the twin towers,nor 7/7,Charlie Hebdo,MEN arena etc. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.
Terrorists don't "threaten",they do it.Big difference."Hence me saying “they use the language of terrorists”. Also their behaviours are escalating | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits! " The people responsible for those things didn't sit in roads and disrupt sporting events | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol" I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be a plowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.
Come on bro....
You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.
Works both ways
Please go away
Isn't this an open forum?
You're free to ignore me.
I'm asking politely for you to not interact with me on the forum.
Seriously!!!
You think that's going to happen! "Why should I allow someone to tell me not to interact? As I've told that poster, they're free to ignore me as per the rules. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. " 100% | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits! " To compare the imbeciles of JSO to the Suffragettes is insulting.Those women had no say in anything until given the vote,they then put candidates forward for election to take the cause further.JSO have'nt got the brains to put anyone up for election. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits! To compare the imbeciles of JSO to the Suffragettes is insulting.Those women had no say in anything until given the vote,they then put candidates forward for election to take the cause further.JSO have'nt got the brains to put anyone up for election." They also wouldn't stand a chance of getting a seat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit. "They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over. Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits! To compare the imbeciles of JSO to the Suffragettes is insulting.Those women had no say in anything until given the vote,they then put candidates forward for election to take the cause further.JSO have'nt got the brains to put anyone up for election." Agreed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits! To compare the imbeciles of JSO to the Suffragettes is insulting.Those women had no say in anything until given the vote,they then put candidates forward for election to take the cause further.JSO have'nt got the brains to put anyone up for election. They also wouldn't stand a chance of getting a seat " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be a plowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple. Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake. The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?
Did I say that?
No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.
I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.
Come on bro....
You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.
Works both ways
Please go away
Isn't this an open forum?
You're free to ignore me.
I'm asking politely for you to not interact with me on the forum.
Seriously!!!
You think that's going to happen! "I can but ask | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation? Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?" First you see if you could reverse back about 20m and accelerate and hit another part of the protest. Repeat this until they move or the car gets stuck on body parts. FFS, they are annoying and self-entitled! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.
They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.
Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it "Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims. Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions. Today’s one was particularly pathetic If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives … instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or … | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What would i use as lube without veg oil Palm oil" thats more like sweat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation? Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim? First you see if you could reverse back about 20m and accelerate and hit another part of the protest. Repeat this until they move or the car gets stuck on body parts. FFS, they are annoying and self-entitled!" Totally normal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation? Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim? First you see if you could reverse back about 20m and accelerate and hit another part of the protest. Repeat this until they move or the car gets stuck on body parts. FFS, they are annoying and self-entitled!" Oh dear … you do realise that some clown is going to take this as an explicit threat of mass murder, don’t you! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits! To compare the imbeciles of JSO to the Suffragettes is insulting.Those women had no say in anything until given the vote,they then put candidates forward for election to take the cause further.JSO have'nt got the brains to put anyone up for election." But that's surely the point... None of the oyher political parties are going near the "get rid of oil" agenda. I quite like the jdea of stirring up the political landscape a bit. Not judging their political motives at all, nor any noble cause. But thinking you can have a world now without oil is like thinking we can have one without air travel. Deluded at best | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.
They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.
Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it
Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.
Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.
Today’s one was particularly pathetic
If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives
… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or … "Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation? Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim? First you see if you could reverse back about 20m and accelerate and hit another part of the protest. Repeat this until they move or the car gets stuck on body parts. FFS, they are annoying and self-entitled! Oh dear … you do realise that some clown is going to take this as an explicit threat of mass murder, don’t you! " No we all know none of the people in this thread are really about it. But it’s just not funny. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Id be using a crowbar to remove oil protesters from the front grill, wheel arches and underside of my 8.2 litre Humvee "Well that's how to go off a person | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.
They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.
Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it
Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.
Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.
Today’s one was particularly pathetic
If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives
… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …
Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods "The message is also deluded and Utopian.If you take just one example:- poor/developing countries,they need fossil fuels/oil to develop and grow their economies to the point where they can afford expensive green alternatives. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.
They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.
Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it
Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.
Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.
Today’s one was particularly pathetic
If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives
… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …
Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods "But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.
They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.
Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it
Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.
Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.
Today’s one was particularly pathetic
If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives
… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …
Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods
But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it? "Effective in turning people against them and making them the object of ridicule. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.
They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.
Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it
Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.
Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.
Today’s one was particularly pathetic
If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives
… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …
Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods
But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it?
Effective in turning people against them and making them the object of ridicule."You feel like that. Don't assume everyone does. How do you think an organisation like that should garner public and government attention? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.
They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.
Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it
Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.
Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.
Today’s one was particularly pathetic
If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives
… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …
Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods
But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it? "Lots of bad things make the front page, if I ran through central London naked with a orange flare hanging out my butt I'm sure I'd make the front page | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.
They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.
Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it
Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.
Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.
Today’s one was particularly pathetic
If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives
… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …
Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods
But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it?
Effective in turning people against them and making them the object of ridicule.
You feel like that. Don't assume everyone does.
How do you think an organisation like that should garner public and government attention? "I don't assume everyone does.I know they have their supporters,therefore not everyone is against them.You have accused me of making assumptions before in other threads.If they want attention,do it the way other causes do it.Protest without disruption,lobby their MP's and candidates,organise a press/pr department,put themselves forward for TV interviews.When they get on TV don't start shouting,interrupting and shouting down other people,going off on incoherent tangents and making absurd incorrect claims like :- "Apples are cooking on the trees" "Birds are falling out of the sky" "You will boil in your own sweat" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits! To compare the imbeciles of JSO to the Suffragettes is insulting.Those women had no say in anything until given the vote,they then put candidates forward for election to take the cause further.JSO have'nt got the brains to put anyone up for election. But that's surely the point... None of the oyher political parties are going near the "get rid of oil" agenda. I quite like the jdea of stirring up the political landscape a bit. Not judging their political motives at all, nor any noble cause. But thinking you can have a world now without oil is like thinking we can have one without air travel. Deluded at best" Jso aren’t suggesting immediate abolition of oil, just no new wells / fields Not offering a viable alternative though, so would be useless in a political environment as they only have half of one policy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.
They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.
Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it
Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.
Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.
Today’s one was particularly pathetic
If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives
… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …
Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods
But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it?
Lots of bad things make the front page, if I ran through central London naked with a orange flare hanging out my butt I'm sure I'd make the front page "Not if you had a rainbow bucket hat on and some comedy breasts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.
They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.
Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it
Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.
Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.
Today’s one was particularly pathetic
If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives
… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …
Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods
But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it? "Not really. Has raised awareness of why they are fucking up sports events and art galleries, but is doing nothing to gather support | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.
They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.
Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it
Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.
Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.
Today’s one was particularly pathetic
If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives
… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …
Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods
But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it?
Effective in turning people against them and making them the object of ridicule.
You feel like that. Don't assume everyone does.
How do you think an organisation like that should garner public and government attention? "By coming up with smart ideas and attractive cost-effective, practical alternatives At the moment; all they’ve got is “somebody should do something” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation? Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?" Just road kill. You can't pick them up but the car behind can if they want. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.
They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.
Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it
Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.
Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.
Today’s one was particularly pathetic
If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives
… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …
Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods
But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it?
Effective in turning people against them and making them the object of ridicule.
You feel like that. Don't assume everyone does.
How do you think an organisation like that should garner public and government attention?
I don't assume everyone does.I know they have their supporters,therefore not everyone is against them.You have accused me of making assumptions before in other threads.If they want attention,do it the way other causes do it.Protest without disruption,lobby their MP's and candidates,organise a press/pr department,put themselves forward for TV interviews.When they get on TV don't start shouting,interrupting and shouting down other people,going off on incoherent tangents and making absurd incorrect claims like :- "Apples are cooking on the trees"
"Birds are falling out of the sky"
"You will boil in your own sweat""Not sure which threads you mean tbh. I haven't seen that interview (interviews?) "Protest without disruption" to me seems fairly pointless without a very large group. The other things you suggest - I don't think will be successful tbh. Not for this issue at this time. Political change is needed but JSO can't deliver that either. I don't know the answer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x" Do people need training for sitting in roads and throwing orange powder and stuff? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x Do people need training for sitting in roads and throwing orange powder and stuff? "Apparently they do The next exciting event they have planned is a Q&A with a member of the Yanomami tribe, but of course, you have to pay for tickets
Bess x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x" Nailed it! Take a bow,, Bess | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x Do people need training for sitting in roads and throwing orange powder and stuff? "Depends how clueless they are to begin with! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x Do people need training for sitting in roads and throwing orange powder and stuff?
Depends how clueless they are to begin with! "Well, the hi-vis vests they wear are made from oil based products, as will be most of what they are wearing. Stones & glass houses? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x" Total cult.With Christianity declining for the past thirty years eco causes are the new religion.When you see Alex de Koenig and all the other children on TV shouting at the interviewer for asking legitimate questions and generally being hysterical it looks just like the discord of a fanatical religion in a state of "rapture".We can hope they all do a "Jonestown". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x Do people need training for sitting in roads and throwing orange powder and stuff?
Depends how clueless they are to begin with! "This is true and I think we've already established they aren't all that clever | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x Do people need training for sitting in roads and throwing orange powder and stuff?
Apparently they do The next exciting event they have planned is a Q&A with a member of the Yanomami tribe, but of course, you have to pay for tickets
Bess x"You have to pay for tickets | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x" Did you miss the 20 page document on the research? The in-depth FAQ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x Did you miss the 20 page document on the research? The in-depth FAQ? "No, I didn't. Was it written by a 5 year old? Embarrassingly full of mistruths, grammatical errors, even a few spelling mistakes. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was originally written in orange crayon, their favourite colour, on a piece of cardboard with no sharp edges. I loved the bit that said "WHAT DO YOU DO WITH YOUR MONEY?" Apart from tea and sandwiches we use the funds to organise, pay for accommodation and travel costs. Tea and sandwiches!!!
Bess x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x Did you miss the 20 page document on the research? The in-depth FAQ?
No, I didn't. Was it written by a 5 year old? Embarrassingly full of mistruths, grammatical errors, even a few spelling mistakes. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was originally written in orange crayon, their favourite colour, on a piece of cardboard with no sharp edges.
I loved the bit that said "WHAT DO YOU DO WITH YOUR MONEY?"
Apart from tea and sandwiches we use the funds to organise, pay for accommodation and travel costs.
Tea and sandwiches!!!
Bess x"No surprise there.Now they have Justin Rowlat (BBC) on their side,a man with a long history of mistruths,assumption leading to 2+2=7 and exaggeration.He has just returned from a jet flight to Spain to report how hot it is in errr....summer.Now we find out that the behavioural psychologists of the governments covid "nudge unit" are advising the BBC on climate change reporting,in other words Project Fear III. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x Did you miss the 20 page document on the research? The in-depth FAQ?
No, I didn't. Was it written by a 5 year old? Embarrassingly full of mistruths, grammatical errors, even a few spelling mistakes. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was originally written in orange crayon, their favourite colour, on a piece of cardboard with no sharp edges.
I loved the bit that said "WHAT DO YOU DO WITH YOUR MONEY?"
Apart from tea and sandwiches we use the funds to organise, pay for accommodation and travel costs.
Tea and sandwiches!!!
Bess x"I am thinking that was possibly a joke. You've said there's nothing on the site about their aims and how they hope to achieve them. That's not true. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Aren’t they funded by an American group, who, in turn, are funded by the descendent of one of the largest oil companies in America? A cynical man would say “hmm an oil producing country funds protestors in another oil producing country to stop finding new sources of oil to produce, that’s mildly odd”. Or perhaps they do slow marches through Houston, Texas too.. Right message, wrong target, wrong approach. " Yeah not sure theyd use the same methods in Houston. Can you imagine them breaking onto the nba stage! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects." There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre. It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely. Bess x Did you miss the 20 page document on the research? The in-depth FAQ?
No, I didn't. Was it written by a 5 year old? Embarrassingly full of mistruths, grammatical errors, even a few spelling mistakes. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was originally written in orange crayon, their favourite colour, on a piece of cardboard with no sharp edges.
I loved the bit that said "WHAT DO YOU DO WITH YOUR MONEY?"
Apart from tea and sandwiches we use the funds to organise, pay for accommodation and travel costs.
Tea and sandwiches!!!
Bess x"Sounds very civilised. Sponsored by hovis and mr kipling | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Print their names and addresses so motorists can pop around later for a chat "We could all stand around their homes and stop them leaving when they have things to do | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Print their names and addresses so motorists can pop around later for a chat "Most of the ring leaders names and addresses are freely available on line. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Print their names and addresses so motorists can pop around later for a chat
We could all stand around their homes and stop them leaving when they have things to do "Why do that pore petrol through ther letter box and keep them warm | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Print their names and addresses so motorists can pop around later for a chat
We could all stand around their homes and stop them leaving when they have things to do
Why do that pore petrol through ther letter box and keep them warm "A bit harsh don’t you think? I was thinking more about blockading vehicles so they couldn’t go about their business and spraying their property orange. What’s good for the goose…. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
