FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Should train drivers beable to strike?

Should train drivers beable to strike?

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *hagTonight OP   Man  over a year ago

From the land of haribos.

So, here we are again with another set of strikes, starting from today lasting to 8th july, then later in july, even further dates added, so basically the whole week, as usual, it is the commuters who will be affected, will you be affected and have to change plans?

What are the strikes about, is it about pay and what can be done to see less of the strikes they have?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rightonsteveMan  over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

These strikes are off the rails. Do they need more pay or extra training or what? They should conduct themselves better. And say thank you at least - that’s the ticket!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I've said it before and I'll say it again, I support everyone's right to strike. There's no reason why anyone in this country should be working in bad conditions or on a full time wage still struggling to keep up with the cost of living. I would never change that just because a strike caused minor disturbance for me.

But that's the media's goal right? Turn everyone on each other so no one points the finger at the people who cause this mess in the first place. Good old Britain.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ansoffateMan  over a year ago

Sagittarius A

Yes

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ittycock400Couple  over a year ago

Bristol

Of course they should have the right to strike. Everyone should have that right.

There was an article by someone who had been very against the rail strikes who broke a leg or ankle. They then found out how much railway staff do to help people and why removing the Train Manager/Guard/Ticket Inspector from trains would be a bad idea. The same applied to replacing station staff with automated ticket machines.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple  over a year ago

Leeds

[Removed by poster at 03/07/23 07:46:00]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *relanddirectMan  over a year ago

cheshire

Without reading any of the replies or comments I think it’s rather simple?

Why should they not be able to strike?

Agree or disagree with the reasons yes, but, fundamentally everyone has the right to strike!

And I’m an employer!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *asycouple1971Couple  over a year ago

midlands

Yes. Everyone should have that right

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Withholding labour is a democratic right of the proletariat any attempt to interfere with that right should be viewed with a degree of suspicion.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inda May SimmonsTV/TS  over a year ago

hexham

Oh crumbs!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *izzy.Woman  over a year ago

Stoke area


"Of course they should have the right to strike. Everyone should have that right.

There was an article by someone who had been very against the rail strikes who broke a leg or ankle. They then found out how much railway staff do to help people and why removing the Train Manager/Guard/Ticket Inspector from trains would be a bad idea. The same applied to replacing station staff with automated ticket machines."

This seeks to be overlooked by most people. It is about pay and conditions, but it's also about cutting staff.

If you are boarding a train at a smaller station and there's no ticket office staff or anyone on the platform, bad luck if you require assistance whether it's information, guidance or physical help to board the train. If there are no staff there, you are going to struggle.

People need help and the staff need their jobs !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inda May SimmonsTV/TS  over a year ago

hexham

I had a neighbour and he was a Raving homosexual. I don’t like homosexuals and I complained. “THEY” came and took him away. Brilliant!

My other neighbour was an immigrant. I don’t like immigrants and I complained. “THEY” came and took him away.

Brilliant!

The other night I got a knock on my door, I opened it and “THEY” were stood there. They said someone had complained that I was a transvestite and they had come to take ME away!

I looked to my neighbours for help but realised I no longer had any neighbours

Not Brilliant, not Brilliant at all !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *aitonelMan  over a year ago

Liverpool

Yes

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ackdaw52Man  over a year ago

Chesterfield

Yes, because if they don't strike nothing changes.

Same for dr's, nurses, teachers etc. They've tried other channels but they just get ignored.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *phialtesMan  over a year ago

Beyond the Wall

But they aren’t striking, its a ban on overtime isn’t it?

If the rail services are reliant on overtime, its not a sustainable business model.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Yes. All power to the people.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ravelling_WilburyMan  over a year ago

Beverley

Agree with it or not, they have the right to strike and strive for better conditions. Nothing would ever get done without protest leading to change

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"But they aren’t striking, its a ban on overtime isn’t it?

If the rail services are reliant on overtime, its not a sustainable business model."

That sounds suspiciously like placing blame on businesses rather than people, even when businesses aren't to blame.

That's not allowed. The staff should make it work through personal responsibility

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oggoneMan  over a year ago

Derry

I support the right to take industrial action and I also support the right for people to ask stupid questions. But 'just asking questions'...........

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *orthernJayMan  over a year ago

LHR


"But they aren’t striking, its a ban on overtime isn’t it?

If the rail services are reliant on overtime, it’s not a sustainable business model."

^^^…..and there it is!!! ^^^

I was holding my ticket before punching it too early! The debate isn’t about people’s right to strike, although globally this is considered a thing of the past; just ask any American furnace worker or docker (yes, I know they’re called different job titles in the States )

Since Thatcher sold the railways it’s been unsustainable, train companies pulling million out in profits, bonuses and shareholder wealth whilst staff are asked to work overtime and rest days to make the system work.

It’s a question of outdated Trade Unionism and the basic facts of business; simple as that!

UK train fares are ridiculous, you need a PhD in Mathematics to work out how to obtain the best ticket, don’t get me started on “split tickets”, UK trains are filthy, late, outdated, the list goes on!

Semi renationalised business models work in Europe and Asia and Australasia just fine, you can time your watch by Japanese trains and let’s remember children; who invented and exported the concept of railways and look at where we are now!?!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I'm going to be, what some might consider, a little controversial by saying that, in my opinion, striking is, ultimately, counter productive.

Whilst I have no issue with anyones RIGHT to strike, such action is ultimately targeted at the wrong people.

It is the customers who suffer.

Those customers, who, in the case of rail strikes, rely on these services to get to work, either have to take a days holiday or find alternative means of transport.

If they choose the latter option, they may find such an alternative to be more reliable and, in turn, choose to switch to that means of transport permanently, thus impacting on the rail company in terms of loss of revenue.

So, OK, now that is having an ompact on the rail workers employer.

However, if enough customers do this, there is a significant downturn in revenue meaning that there is LESS money available to give the striking workers what it is that they're striking for - i.e. better pay.

The fact that train drivers are already paid quite substantial salaries and are among the highest paid train drivers in Europe is perhaps irrelevant at this point.

So the Train company then has to make cutbacks or put up their prices.

People are already finding that rail travel is incredibly expensive, especially when compared to other forms of travel, so you find that increasing prices might result in further loss of customers.

So perhaps someone can explain to me how such action is going to lead to the result the union is looking for.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hagTonight OP   Man  over a year ago

From the land of haribos.

[Removed by poster at 03/07/23 09:09:05]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hagTonight OP   Man  over a year ago

From the land of haribos.


"These strikes are off the rails. Do they need more pay or extra training or what? They should conduct themselves better. And say thank you at least - that’s the ticket! "
That is right, these strikes are off the rails too, it is always the commuters that will be affected by it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ravelling_WilburyMan  over a year ago

Beverley


"But they aren’t striking, its a ban on overtime isn’t it?

If the rail services are reliant on overtime, it’s not a sustainable business model.

^^^…..and there it is!!! ^^^

I was holding my ticket before punching it too early! The debate isn’t about people’s right to strike, although globally this is considered a thing of the past; just ask any American furnace worker or docker (yes, I know they’re called different job titles in the States )

Since Thatcher sold the railways it’s been unsustainable, train companies pulling million out in profits, bonuses and shareholder wealth whilst staff are asked to work overtime and rest days to make the system work.

It’s a question of outdated Trade Unionism and the basic facts of business; simple as that!

UK train fares are ridiculous, you need a PhD in Mathematics to work out how to obtain the best ticket, don’t get me started on “split tickets”, UK trains are filthy, late, outdated, the list goes on!

Semi renationalised business models work in Europe and Asia and Australasia just fine, you can time your watch by Japanese trains and let’s remember children; who invented and exported the concept of railways and look at where we are now!?! "

Cheers for that. Other than the last paragraph I am ignorant to it all because I use the train about once a year, so will have a read up on it

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *orthernJayMan  over a year ago

LHR


"I'm going to be, what some might consider, a little controversial by saying that, in my opinion, striking is, ultimately, counter productive.

Whilst I have no issue with anyones RIGHT to strike, such action is ultimately targeted at the wrong people.

It is the customers who suffer.

Those customers, who, in the case of rail strikes, rely on these services to get to work, either have to take a days holiday or find alternative means of transport.

If they choose the latter option, they may find such an alternative to be more reliable and, in turn, choose to switch to that means of transport permanently, thus impacting on the rail company in terms of loss of revenue.

So, OK, now that is having an ompact on the rail workers employer.

However, if enough customers do this, there is a significant downturn in revenue meaning that there is LESS money available to give the striking workers what it is that they're striking for - i.e. better pay.

The fact that train drivers are already paid quite substantial salaries and are among the highest paid train drivers in Europe is perhaps irrelevant at this point.

So the Train company then has to make cutbacks or put up their prices.

People are already finding that rail travel is incredibly expensive, especially when compared to other forms of travel, so you find that increasing prices might result in further loss of customers.

So perhaps someone can explain to me how such action is going to lead to the result the union is looking for.

"

Strikes won’t make a tap of difference!

That’s why the train companies and government representatives won’t negotiate, Sunak is waiting to see if he wins the general, if not then it’s someone else’s problem, let’s see what Labour do with it, if Sunak wins the general then still no deal; he’ll starve them out is my guess akin to Thatcher and the miners!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *orkshire biMan  over a year ago

elland

Did I not see or hear somewhere it's not the drivers that striking. It's the people like signal men and so on that trains can't run without that r striking so it means the trains can't run. Is it just the press as usual stirring things up?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Let’s be clear, this week is not a strike by the train drivers. I’m simply them saying that they’re not going to work extra days.

Severs train operating companies rely heavily on their staff working in excess of their rostered days to maintain their full timetable.

The fact that an amended timetable has been brought in as a result is testament to this.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *orthernJayMan  over a year ago

LHR


"Did I not see or hear somewhere it's not the drivers that striking. It's the people like signal men and so on that trains can't run without that r striking so it means the trains can't run. Is it just the press as usual stirring things up?"

It’s drivers, signallers and for a while it was maintenance although the latter did a deal early if memory serves me right!

Surely there’s a few rail workers on Fab who can give us their inside views of pissing money down the drain on strike!?!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uckmonkeyMan  over a year ago

devon

Yes… but it’s not always about pay. Conditions are a big factor like reducing sick pay, reducing holiday and increasing hours worked with shorter breaks which puts more of a strain on the individual which in turn puts the passengers safety at risk…..it’s frustrating for the public but it’s also not cheap for the individual to strike as they may need the overtime to live on..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Let’s be clear, this week is not a strike by the train drivers. I’m simply them saying that they’re not going to work extra days.

Severs train operating companies rely heavily on their staff working in excess of their rostered days to maintain their full timetable.

The fact that an amended timetable has been brought in as a result is testament to this."

Darn autocorrect “ITS simply them saying” and “SEVERAL train operating companies”

Again for those in the back, this week is not a strike , just not working overtime

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uckmonkeyMan  over a year ago

devon

Strike, ban or work to rule is all similar, strike is usually the last resort as it’s costly to the workers and so many hoops need to be jumped through to actually get to that stage… it’s not easy and has to be planned well in advance…

Overtime ban you can’t be sacked for….

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *zael ElohimMan  over a year ago

Scarborough

No corpo or government boot lickers please. This country is absolutely screwed and it is not because of the poor trying desperately to keep a roof over our heads or the people coming here to live. Nor is it the gays or transgender people.

The reason for a decline in services and standards, the causes of all this suffering is corpo ownership and government corruption. Plain and simple, so yes, strike. Everyone stay home, spend time with your families. Every single Billionaire (not currently in the bottom of the ocean) is wealthy because of you and your hard work. This country functions because of you not Richy rich or Liegel Farage. It is time we reminded the rich who got them there and how quickly it all falls apart if we stop contributing.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oggoneMan  over a year ago

Derry


"Let’s be clear, this week is not a strike by the train drivers. I’m simply them saying that they’re not going to work extra days.

Severs train operating companies rely heavily on their staff working in excess of their rostered days to maintain their full timetable.

The fact that an amended timetable has been brought in as a result is testament to this."

yeah, but headlines.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *orthernJayMan  over a year ago

LHR


"No corpo or government boot lickers please. This country is absolutely screwed and it is not because of the poor trying desperately to keep a roof over our heads or the people coming here to live. Nor is it the gays or transgender people.

The reason for a decline in services and standards, the causes of all this suffering is corpo ownership and government corruption. Plain and simple, so yes, strike. Everyone stay home, spend time with your families. Every single Billionaire (not currently in the bottom of the ocean) is wealthy because of you and your hard work. This country functions because of you not Richy rich or Liegel Farage. It is time we reminded the rich who got them there and how quickly it all falls apart if we stop contributing. "

You make very valid points, however the capitalist society adopted by the UK many moons ago is long behind redemption!

For sure, a rebalancing of the power/wealth dynamic is well overdue, unfortunately it’s a government that’s long past change, knows it’s heading for opposition and wants to keep those six or seven figure salary options open come the changing of the guard!

A windfall tax on fuel and energy suppliers alone could pay for train system improvements in salary and service, but why bother when you’re headed for the Board of said energy company!

Such is life, anyone for tennis darling

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *orkshire biMan  over a year ago

elland

What about the water company's that r in trouble but the top brass have been millions in bonuses. That tells u where the money goes. Same with the supermarkets and post office.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hagTonight OP   Man  over a year ago

From the land of haribos.


"I've said it before and I'll say it again, I support everyone's right to strike. There's no reason why anyone in this country should be working in bad conditions or on a full time wage still struggling to keep up with the cost of living. I would never change that just because a strike caused minor disturbance for me.

But that's the media's goal right? Turn everyone on each other so no one points the finger at the people who cause this mess in the first place. Good old Britain."

You are right there and same here. I also support it. I think that the only sector that arent allowed to strike are the armed forces, which I think is unfair for them.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uffolk_bigguyMan  over a year ago

Tractor Town

Should traffic wardens be armed?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *9XAYNOR69Man  over a year ago

Centralised he/him/his From the land of cocksuckers

Unfortunately the rail operaters are looking to impose some changes that the rail unions are unhappy with.

One is disposing with the guards, on the trains. Also down the line and with technology advancing as it is driverless trains.

It's not just about the pay.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ndycoinsMan  over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"No corpo or government boot lickers please. This country is absolutely screwed and it is not because of the poor trying desperately to keep a roof over our heads or the people coming here to live. Nor is it the gays or transgender people.

The reason for a decline in services and standards, the causes of all this suffering is corpo ownership and government corruption. Plain and simple, so yes, strike. Everyone stay home, spend time with your families. Every single Billionaire (not currently in the bottom of the ocean) is wealthy because of you and your hard work. This country functions because of you not Richy rich or Liegel Farage. It is time we reminded the rich who got them there and how quickly it all falls apart if we stop contributing.

You make very valid points, however the capitalist society adopted by the UK many moons ago is long behind redemption!

For sure, a rebalancing of the power/wealth dynamic is well overdue, unfortunately it’s a government that’s long past change, knows it’s heading for opposition and wants to keep those six or seven figure salary options open come the changing of the guard!

A windfall tax on fuel and energy suppliers alone could pay for train system improvements in salary and service, but why bother when you’re headed for the Board of said energy company!

Such is life, anyone for tennis darling "

A windfall tax will simply be passed on to the customer or be taken out of the inward investment budget

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *TG3Man  over a year ago

Dorchester

Yes its in our constitution the right to have a say on injustice

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ndycoinsMan  over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,

Of course drivers have the right to strike even if they think £70k a year to sit down and drive is not enough.Pasengers also have the right to use (cheaper) alternatives.Passenger numbers are already down because of WFH,lose more passengers they will have to lose staff,or put the ticket prices up and lose passengers.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eversayNeverCoupleCouple  over a year ago

Liverpool

Yes.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hagTonight OP   Man  over a year ago

From the land of haribos.


"I've said it before and I'll say it again, I support everyone's right to strike. There's no reason why anyone in this country should be working in bad conditions or on a full time wage still struggling to keep up with the cost of living. I would never change that just because a strike caused minor disturbance for me.

But that's the media's goal right? Turn everyone on each other so no one points the finger at the people who cause this mess in the first place. Good old Britain.You are right there and same here. I also support it. I think that the only sector that arent allowed to strike are the armed forces, which I think is unfair for them."

I was interested to know how much a soldier in the uk earns on average and it is £24,400 whilst a train driver in london earns £62,608 per year, so it is abit of a difference there.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Yes, drivers and other staff, indeed other industries should be allowed to strike. End of discussion.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ackdaw52Man  over a year ago

Chesterfield

I do think they've overplayed the strike card though.

The RMT or ASLEF or whatever seem to exist purely to organise strikes.

They are striking because that is what they do.

And people wouldn't mind so much if they ever made progress, but they don't.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *aggonerMan  over a year ago

for a penny

People tend to forget that the point of striking is to demonstrate the importance of their service. If they’re not causing inconvenience, their importance is questionable.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *obilebottomMan  over a year ago

All over


"I do think they've overplayed the strike card though.

The RMT or ASLEF or whatever seem to exist purely to organise strikes.

They are striking because that is what they do.

And people wouldn't mind so much if they ever made progress, but they don't."

It takes two to tango though

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I do think they've overplayed the strike card though.

The RMT or ASLEF or whatever seem to exist purely to organise strikes.

They are striking because that is what they do.

And people wouldn't mind so much if they ever made progress, but they don't."

The DFT are unwilling to engage in meaningful talks, and also unwilling to allow individual TOCS to negotiate with their staff.

This is a failure of government.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *aitonelMan  over a year ago

Liverpool

I miss the fantasy of a cliché walk out strike.

No rules or red tape. No schedule on and off.

Just simply the will of the people bringing employers to their knees - and not the fab kind.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *isfits behaving badlyCouple  over a year ago

Coventry

Train drivers are not Surfs. They have a right to withdraw their Labour in dispute in accordance with already tight law. Not work in addition to what they are contracted for. To negotiate their terms and conditions with their employer (something that the DFT is preventing their employers doing using the bizarre framework of current contract agreements between the companies and the DFT). Especially when these terms and conditions are trying to be radically changed. The same right as anyone else bar a couple of expectations.

It's bazaar, dark and cynical how the government has played to band them up into into a category critical to national safety same as say key nuclear workers in the new bill to bring in minimum service. Its a blatant and outrageous attack on the rights of working people. Aimed at the railway industry because it is one of the few industries left where Unions and the solidarity of their members have protected the working conditions and safety of their members.

When will people see that this government's cynical ploy to pitch working people against working only weakens working people and deflects attention from who's actions, failings and private intrests are hunting your pockets and quality of life.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I honestly have never understood the process of going on strike.

1) As a employee, if you are unhappy about something at work, then you should be able to leave to find somewhere you are happy with.

2) As an employer, if your employee is unhappy about something at work, then they should be allowed to let them leave, or fire them.

I really don't understand it. Both sides are obviously not happy during a strike, so why continue

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ingdangTV/TS  over a year ago

manchester

No, they are hijacking the country using public service. They can leave their job if they are not happy with the Pay.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I honestly have never understood the process of going on strike.

1) As a employee, if you are unhappy about something at work, then you should be able to leave to find somewhere you are happy with.

2) As an employer, if your employee is unhappy about something at work, then they should be allowed to let them leave, or fire them.

I really don't understand it. Both sides are obviously not happy during a strike, so why continue "

We used to live in a country where people had options and could just walk out of one job into the next. The world isn't like that anymore and it's tough on the job market, also who can afford not to work these days. Employers are aware of this and take advantage. No one chooses to be unhappy in their jobs, a lot of people simply have no choice.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *aitonelMan  over a year ago

Liverpool


"No, they are hijacking the country using public service. They can leave their job if they are not happy with the Pay. "

And people can find other forms of transport and plan ahead accordingly. Works both ways.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ee04Man  over a year ago

Essex

Right to strike is a fundamental right, it was fought for and a lot of blood was spilt in the process.

It is a last resort, it is also a a democratic process as any strike needs to be voted for by the membership of the union. They days of shop stewards calling “All out” are long gone.

To answer to the question of the state of UK railways is due to years of under investment in infrastructure and running stock. I have thankfully not been a computer for decades, however I once was and hated everyday of. Overcrowded, dirty, slow, and just downright annoying.

It amazes me how for me to get 15 miles into central London costs the best part of £20. A couple of years ago I was in Rome €6 to travel on any public transport train, tram or bus for 3 days. Always got a seat clean quiet and easy. In the whole week I was there I used 2 Ubers and 1 taxi. Taxi from airport to hotel Uber back to hotel as I was a bit d*unk and Uber back to airport.

As is the case with everything in this country, it is looking backwards to an age that no longer exists.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oggoneMan  over a year ago

Derry


"I've said it before and I'll say it again, I support everyone's right to strike. There's no reason why anyone in this country should be working in bad conditions or on a full time wage still struggling to keep up with the cost of living. I would never change that just because a strike caused minor disturbance for me.

But that's the media's goal right? Turn everyone on each other so no one points the finger at the people who cause this mess in the first place. Good old Britain.You are right there and same here. I also support it. I think that the only sector that arent allowed to strike are the armed forces, which I think is unfair for them.I was interested to know how much a soldier in the uk earns on average and it is £24,400 whilst a train driver in london earns £62,608 per year, so it is abit of a difference there."

And the roles are not comparable either.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Did I not see or hear somewhere it's not the drivers that striking. It's the people like signal men and so on that trains can't run without that r striking so it means the trains can't run. Is it just the press as usual stirring things up?"

This strike is the train drivers, and its an overtime ban so drivers will only work their booked hours.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Unfortunately the rail operaters are looking to impose some changes that the rail unions are unhappy with.

One is disposing with the guards, on the trains. Also down the line and with technology advancing as it is driverless trains.

It's not just about the pay.

"

We will never see driverless mainline trains in our lifetime I can assure you of that. The government want to do away with ticket offices, guards on trains and leave stations unmanned. Most trains cannot run without a guard so I don't know how they think that will work!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hagTonight OP   Man  over a year ago

From the land of haribos.

[Removed by poster at 03/07/23 15:01:07]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hagTonight OP   Man  over a year ago

From the land of haribos.


"I've said it before and I'll say it again, I support everyone's right to strike. There's no reason why anyone in this country should be working in bad conditions or on a full time wage still struggling to keep up with the cost of living. I would never change that just because a strike caused minor disturbance for me.

But that's the media's goal right? Turn everyone on each other so no one points the finger at the people who cause this mess in the first place. Good old Britain.You are right there and same here. I also support it. I think that the only sector that arent allowed to strike are the armed forces, which I think is unfair for them.I was interested to know how much a soldier in the uk earns on average and it is £24,400 whilst a train driver in london earns £62,608 per year, so it is abit of a difference there.

And the roles are not comparable either. "

That is right, it is not, although the difference is the right to strike, by comparison of the 2 roles on the public sector of it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *obilebottomMan  over a year ago

All over


"Right to strike is a fundamental right, it was fought for and a lot of blood was spilt in the process.

It is a last resort, it is also a a democratic process as any strike needs to be voted for by the membership of the union. They days of shop stewards calling “All out” are long gone.

To answer to the question of the state of UK railways is due to years of under investment in infrastructure and running stock. I have thankfully not been a computer for decades, however I once was and hated everyday of. Overcrowded, dirty, slow, and just downright annoying.

It amazes me how for me to get 15 miles into central London costs the best part of £20. A couple of years ago I was in Rome €6 to travel on any public transport train, tram or bus for 3 days. Always got a seat clean quiet and easy. In the whole week I was there I used 2 Ubers and 1 taxi. Taxi from airport to hotel Uber back to hotel as I was a bit d*unk and Uber back to airport.

As is the case with everything in this country, it is looking backwards to an age that no longer exists. "

It's true, same with everything. Apparently Manchester airport was going to be amazing after all the work. Try and spot the difference, hardly any. Leeds/Bradford was just stopped all together. Roads repairs are the same, cheap temporary fixes that nobody bothers to even check and are back to the same within months if not weeks. No planning, no organisation, no investment. More importantly no pride vand care anymore and begore someone says it all needs money, it does but I don't believe that is the reason. They are just bad at what they do and don't care and have no pride. If other countries srou d us can have great transport and nice vomfortable airpots and better roads etc, so should we. Thats my rant, I am out

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *hagTonight OP   Man  over a year ago

From the land of haribos.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0781

0