|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Advice from the Ladies would be helpful...
I dont feel like my profile is too bad, its not awash with cock pics or anything like that. Im varified and i will provide a face pic on request.
So is the lack of replies sinply down to the amount of messages yoh ladies get? Or is there something i could improve on?
I always read profiles before i message, and my message is either a little about me and an introduction or a response to something in their profile.
Are you girls just spoilt for choice? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
If I got as far as the pictures I'd probably reply just for the Bwitched tattoo
But it probably comes down to message content and compatibility.
If someone's intro is so impersonal to me it could be their profile text, I assume it's a bland copy paste aimed at every viable female and disragerd the whole thing, however polite and well constructed it is, for example.
If someone messages me that's outside of my stated preferences, or I'm outside of theirs, or their preferences say any woman between legal and dead, its a pass.
There's many reasons that people may not be interested.
Yes, there's a lot of messages constantly for single women, but the endless sea of unwanted noodles just makes the ones that do stand out shine brighter for me. So I wouldn't put it down to that alone. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rsPricklePantsWoman
over a year ago
Room 237 at The Overlook Hotel, Suffolk |
"Advice from the Ladies would be helpful...
I dont feel like my profile is too bad, its not awash with cock pics or anything like that. Im varified and i will provide a face pic on request.
So is the lack of replies sinply down to the amount of messages yoh ladies get? Or is there something i could improve on?
I always read profiles before i message, and my message is either a little about me and an introduction or a response to something in their profile.
Are you girls just spoilt for choice?"
Personally I think that sounds reasonable especially if you connect what you are saying to what's on their profile to prove you've read and understood it
Not all women get flooded with messages although I've heard many do so don't let the ratio get to you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
You've had 4 meets in just 3 months and you're complaining?
Most single guys don't get their first meet until they've been here for about a year, so you should consider that you're doing rather better than most |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If I got as far as the pictures I'd probably reply just for the Bwitched tattoo
But it probably comes down to message content and compatibility.
If someone's intro is so impersonal to me it could be their profile text, I assume it's a bland copy paste aimed at every viable female and disragerd the whole thing, however polite and well constructed it is, for example.
If someone messages me that's outside of my stated preferences, or I'm outside of theirs, or their preferences say any woman between legal and dead, its a pass.
There's many reasons that people may not be interested.
Yes, there's a lot of messages constantly for single women, but the endless sea of unwanted noodles just makes the ones that do stand out shine brighter for me. So I wouldn't put it down to that alone."
Sorry for the post hijack (take it as a bump) but this whole age thing is curious.
Why is an open age range so bad? If I specify a range of only 30 and 31 does that imply I will fuck anyone of that age irrespective of any other preferences? Why then is the assumption that a person with an open age range is a person who'll fuck anything? Personally I don't see age as a reason not to be attracted to a person. While it is true I'm less and less likely to have common ground with a person the greater the age range (particularly those who are a lot younger) it doesn't mean that I could never find someone 30 years older or 20 years younger attractive. There's a huge list of things that will put me off a person so why would I further restrict my choice with age limits? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Advice from the Ladies would be helpful...
I dont feel like my profile is too bad, its not awash with cock pics or anything like that. Im varified and i will provide a face pic on request.
So is the lack of replies sinply down to the amount of messages yoh ladies get? Or is there something i could improve on?
I always read profiles before i message, and my message is either a little about me and an introduction or a response to something in their profile.
Are you girls just spoilt for choice?"
Your verifications in the short amount of time suggests that your doing something right.....
Remember your awash in a sea of cock so don't plan to be knee deep in clunge every weekend. My suggestion to you would be to explore organised socials and clubs as thise two elements opens up a whole new world of fab, that all don't access |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Sorry for the post hijack (take it as a bump) but this whole age thing is curious.
Why is an open age range so bad? If I specify a range of only 30 and 31 does that imply I will fuck anyone of that age irrespective of any other preferences? Why then is the assumption that a person with an open age range is a person who'll fuck anything? Personally I don't see age as a reason not to be attracted to a person. While it is true I'm less and less likely to have common ground with a person the greater the age range (particularly those who are a lot younger) it doesn't mean that I could never find someone 30 years older or 20 years younger attractive. There's a huge list of things that will put me off a person so why would I further restrict my choice with age limits? "
I tend to look at not stating a preference as just a way to maximise potential options regardless of how attractive you find them. My preferred age range is slightly older than me. I don't block messages from other age groups but the preference is there as it's where I'm most likely to find someone that appeals. If someone outside of that appeals in their message, great, but it would need to be more than the usual for me to not ignore it for being outside my stated preferences.
I like to be into people. I like people to be into me. Otherwise the whole thing falls flat for me. The age range to me just indicates that any hole's a goal and I pretty much instantly turn off. Might not be the intent, but it's my perception of it. I did say for me personally, others won't give a single shit about it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Sorry for the post hijack (take it as a bump) but this whole age thing is curious.
Why is an open age range so bad? If I specify a range of only 30 and 31 does that imply I will fuck anyone of that age irrespective of any other preferences? Why then is the assumption that a person with an open age range is a person who'll fuck anything? Personally I don't see age as a reason not to be attracted to a person. While it is true I'm less and less likely to have common ground with a person the greater the age range (particularly those who are a lot younger) it doesn't mean that I could never find someone 30 years older or 20 years younger attractive. There's a huge list of things that will put me off a person so why would I further restrict my choice with age limits?
I tend to look at not stating a preference as just a way to maximise potential options regardless of how attractive you find them. My preferred age range is slightly older than me. I don't block messages from other age groups but the preference is there as it's where I'm most likely to find someone that appeals. If someone outside of that appeals in their message, great, but it would need to be more than the usual for me to not ignore it for being outside my stated preferences.
I like to be into people. I like people to be into me. Otherwise the whole thing falls flat for me. The age range to me just indicates that any hole's a goal and I pretty much instantly turn off. Might not be the intent, but it's my perception of it. I did say for me personally, others won't give a single shit about it."
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic