FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Bisexual
Bisexual
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever." There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No not at all. But I'd question how attracted a bi man was to me. And that's most definitely and insecurity of mine but would make men who are straight more appealing to me in a one to one scenario. " The thing about being bi is that you could be attracted to either sex. Without knowing you personally, I can see plenty to make you attractive | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 … | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not seedy no, but in general two women together is a top male fantasy, yet two men together isn't as high up in the list of women's fantasies, got nothing to do with seediness, I guess different sexes just have different turn ons" If not watching two men together, how about MMF threesomes? Would it be more of a turn-on for all parties to interact? It’s sexier to join in than to sit back and watch. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " It sounds like it would be a very unhealthy opinion to have.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. " They'll be the straight ones then. In the same way as there are women who recoil at the thought of sexy time with another woman. That doesn't make being bi seedy... that makes some people straight. As has been said, I like sexual people. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. " as true as that is, it doesnt bring the word seedy to mind. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think I've exhausted most of my debate brain cells for today... But a lot of it comes down to sexism and homophobia. You can tell such things are still subconscious issues (especially with men) by looking around the forum, plenty of men are worried (for example) that by liking various sexual acts they 'could be gay' (it's always gay - never bi!?)... There is a stigma for bi men that still needs to be worked on to be overcome. - bi men are somehow less 'masculine' - They are more likely to cheat - they are more likely to engage in unprotected sex Just some of the things I've seen on the forums let alone heard in conversation. " Exactly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. as true as that is, it doesnt bring the word seedy to mind." Bad choice of a word then. What would you call it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? It sounds like it would be a very unhealthy opinion to have. "Indeed it would | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " No, I also don’t think it’s regarded at seedy either. It’s more to do with his masculinity, how many times do you still hear in films or TV series some guy calling another a ‘cock sucker’? It’s saying to both sexes if you indulge in this act in some way your masculinity is diminished. Anal sex even in the gay community if you take it, you’re not as manly as the guy giving. 100% straight is seen as the ultimate in machismo for both men and women, no hint of femininity or submitting to anyone, ergo more attractive. Obviously not all women or men fall into this narrow opinion of what it is to be a man, but for some it’s the ultimate and only preference for a partner even someone who just a FWB. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. " That would be because they're straight, same as a woman not wanting to be near another woman because it's not her thing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. That would be because they're straight, same as a woman not wanting to be near another woman because it's not her thing " I said that a while back... doesn't seem like it is an opinion that is important  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. That would be because they're straight, same as a woman not wanting to be near another woman because it's not her thing I said that a while back... doesn't seem like it is an opinion that is important "It's more a fact than a opinion though  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. That would be because they're straight, same as a woman not wanting to be near another woman because it's not her thing I said that a while back... doesn't seem like it is an opinion that is important
It's more a fact than a opinion though "I thought so... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " Never done me any harm on here , out and proud  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No not at all..I love just sitting back and watching my husband with another man …"Wish my wife was so open about me being bi. She knows but not keen on the 3ways | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? "  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems a wasted opportunity for a mixed group not to enjoy each other" For who? Not the straight ones I wouldn’t think | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. " Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. " I'd agree with this, a lot of men's fantasies seem to be mff threesomes. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " It’s certainly not my perception but it’s pretty obvious that for whatever reason around here, a lot of people have differing perceptions of bi-males and bi-females. I know about “preferences” and all that but I can’t help feeling sorry for bi-males who are disadvantaged for being honest about their sexuality | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. " It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing." Makes sense yes. I just want to add I don’t think it’s not acceptable it just doesn’t float my boat as such. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. Makes sense yes. I just want to add I don’t think it’s not acceptable it just doesn’t float my boat as such. " Ah yeah I know you've no issues with it, it's just not your thing
I wasn't sure which word to use... "normal" and "regular" felt a bit off to me, but "acceptable" seemed to work in my head | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing." I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. " Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category." Lesbian porn has it's own category so how is it double standards? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category." Pretty much exactly what I was going to say  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Lesbian porn has it's own category so how is it double standards? " Lesbian porn does, bisexual porn involving 2 bi women in a threesome is in the straight category and 2 bi men in a threesome isn't. That was the comment made further up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say "A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say
A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there "Is there a bisexual female section? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say
A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there "When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn? To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say
A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there
When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn?
To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Lesbian porn has it's own category so how is it double standards? Lesbian porn does, bisexual porn involving 2 bi women in a threesome is in the straight category and 2 bi men in a threesome isn't. That was the comment made further up." If you click on the threesome cat and then use filters there's FMM option which no doubt has bi sexual guys on it and that's in the so called straight section of which there isn't one as it's just all or gay | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Lesbian porn has it's own category so how is it double standards? Lesbian porn does, bisexual porn involving 2 bi women in a threesome is in the straight category and 2 bi men in a threesome isn't. That was the comment made further up. If you click on the threesome cat and then use filters there's FMM option which no doubt has bi sexual guys on it and that's in the so called straight section of which there isn't one as it's just all or gay " Yeah I just checked and FMM section is just two dudes fucking a woman, no guy on guy from what I saw | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say
A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there
When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn?
To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids "It's easy to use the search function so that doesn't happen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Lesbian porn has it's own category so how is it double standards? Lesbian porn does, bisexual porn involving 2 bi women in a threesome is in the straight category and 2 bi men in a threesome isn't. That was the comment made further up. If you click on the threesome cat and then use filters there's FMM option which no doubt has bi sexual guys on it and that's in the so called straight section of which there isn't one as it's just all or gay Yeah I just checked and FMM section is just two dudes fucking a woman, no guy on guy from what I saw " Then just use search for 2 bi guys | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " Nope, accept people for who they are, what they are and how they are. Do wonder if this is your perception though op | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What's porn? It sounds messy" Depends what you type in search bar  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What's porn? It sounds messy Depends what you type in search bar "Isn't there some kind of rule about that? Rule 34, I believe. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Lesbian porn has it's own category so how is it double standards? Lesbian porn does, bisexual porn involving 2 bi women in a threesome is in the straight category and 2 bi men in a threesome isn't. That was the comment made further up. If you click on the threesome cat and then use filters there's FMM option which no doubt has bi sexual guys on it and that's in the so called straight section of which there isn't one as it's just all or gay Yeah I just checked and FMM section is just two dudes fucking a woman, no guy on guy from what I saw Then just use search for 2 bi guys "Or we could just mix all the bi porn together | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What's porn? It sounds messy Depends what you type in search bar
Isn't there some kind of rule about that? Rule 34, I believe."No idea but definitely don't look for blue waffle or whatever it's called | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say
A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there
When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn?
To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids
It's easy to use the search function so that doesn't happen "Can you really not see how this sounds and still think there isn't a double standard? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What's porn? It sounds messy Depends what you type in search bar
Isn't there some kind of rule about that? Rule 34, I believe.
No idea but definitely don't look for blue waffle or whatever it's called "I never search for anything I read on here... since that episode. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say
A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there
When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn?
To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids
It's easy to use the search function so that doesn't happen
Can you really not see how this sounds and still think there isn't a double standard? "Not really, I use the search function when looking at porn. Think most people do rather than just looking aimlessly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What's porn? It sounds messy Depends what you type in search bar
Isn't there some kind of rule about that? Rule 34, I believe.
No idea but definitely don't look for blue waffle or whatever it's called
I never search for anything I read on here... since that episode." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems a wasted opportunity for a mixed group not to enjoy each other" Wasted opportunity for who? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say
A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there
When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn?
To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids
It's easy to use the search function so that doesn't happen
Can you really not see how this sounds and still think there isn't a double standard?
Not really, I use the search function when looking at porn. Think most people do rather than just looking aimlessly "But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say
A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there
When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn?
To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids
It's easy to use the search function so that doesn't happen
Can you really not see how this sounds and still think there isn't a double standard?
Not really, I use the search function when looking at porn. Think most people do rather than just looking aimlessly
But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly?"All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen " So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " Not at all. I have nothing against peoples' personal preferences. Its personality that matters. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search?" But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? " But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them "So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would say that male bi-phobia is a bigger issue these days than homophobia I know it's not a competition, I just think we still have a long way to go Recognition and acceptance of bi men needs to be addressed - often starting with bi and gay men themselves This whole fascination from gays of wanting to meet 'straight / bi' guys is equally as unhelpful and, to me, is just homophobia in a different wrapper " I do get what you mean I think, some men will look for any loop hole or excuse not to be bi, there are worse things you can be, like Tory. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it "Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble"You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same "When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh"I haven't contradicted myself though, it's not my problem that you don't understand what I'm saying and I'm not asking you to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I haven't contradicted myself though, it's not my problem that you don't understand what I'm saying and I'm not asking you to. "You started off by saying you don't want to flick through loads of things, and then say people should use filters just like you do so you don't see it. Sounds pretty contradictory but don't worry, after this, I'll let you have the last word that you're clearly dying to have | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think I've exhausted most of my debate brain cells for today... But a lot of it comes down to sexism and homophobia. You can tell such things are still subconscious issues (especially with men) by looking around the forum, plenty of men are worried (for example) that by liking various sexual acts they 'could be gay' (it's always gay - never bi!?)... There is a stigma for bi men that still needs to be worked on to be overcome. - bi men are somehow less 'masculine' - They are more likely to cheat - they are more likely to engage in unprotected sex Just some of the things I've seen on the forums let alone heard in conversation. " It’s also your own experience of bi men. Definitely not less masculine in my experience , more alpha dom. I shared a house when younger with some bi men and they were basically gay men that would fuck women as well but mostly cruised for men by night and acted straight by day. I’ve also experienced married bi men at swingers parties, clearly much more interested in the men | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I haven't contradicted myself though, it's not my problem that you don't understand what I'm saying and I'm not asking you to.
You started off by saying you don't want to flick through loads of things, and then say people should use filters just like you do so you don't see it. Sounds pretty contradictory but don't worry, after this, I'll let you have the last word that you're clearly dying to have "At the moment it's filted so not mixed, it wouldn't be filtered if was mixed is what I'm saying. Do you understand this, do you sprecken the English? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I haven't contradicted myself though, it's not my problem that you don't understand what I'm saying and I'm not asking you to.
You started off by saying you don't want to flick through loads of things, and then say people should use filters just like you do so you don't see it. Sounds pretty contradictory but don't worry, after this, I'll let you have the last word that you're clearly dying to have
At the moment it's filted so not mixed, it wouldn't be filtered if was mixed is what I'm saying. Do you understand this, do you sprecken the English? "We're not talking about when we use filters. On a general page, browsing the site, on the "straight" version you will see bisexual women in a threesome but not bisexual men in a threesome. For the latter, it has its own category which is why we are saying there is a double standard. You've taken the original point made, and twisted it to fit in your own narrative. So please understand comprehension before judging my English. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No not at all. But I'd question how attracted a bi man was to me. And that's most definitely and insecurity of mine but would make men who are straight more appealing to me in a one to one scenario. " I'd crawl naked over 3 miles of broken glass just to say _ello to you  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I haven't contradicted myself though, it's not my problem that you don't understand what I'm saying and I'm not asking you to.
You started off by saying you don't want to flick through loads of things, and then say people should use filters just like you do so you don't see it. Sounds pretty contradictory but don't worry, after this, I'll let you have the last word that you're clearly dying to have
At the moment it's filted so not mixed, it wouldn't be filtered if was mixed is what I'm saying. Do you understand this, do you sprecken the English?
We're not talking about when we use filters. On a general page, browsing the site, on the "straight" version you will see bisexual women in a threesome but not bisexual men in a threesome. For the latter, it has its own category which is why we are saying there is a double standard. You've taken the original point made, and twisted it to fit in your own narrative. So please understand comprehension before judging my English."Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. "Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post"Now now fellas, put the handbags down | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post
Now now fellas, put the handbags down "Or you know, just get it on already. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post
Now now fellas, put the handbags down
Or you know, just get it on already. "Oh hell yeah, I'd watch that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? Nope, accept people for who they are, what they are and how they are. Do wonder if this is your perception though op " Not my perception. Check my profile: it says I’m bi | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post
Now now fellas, put the handbags down
Or you know, just get it on already. "Veris would be a beautiful read, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post
Now now fellas, put the handbags down
Or you know, just get it on already.
Oh hell yeah, I'd watch that "What category would it be in though? How would I filter it in? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " No | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post"Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post
Now now fellas, put the handbags down
Or you know, just get it on already.
Oh hell yeah, I'd watch that
What category would it be in though?
How would I filter it in?"I think you'd need to use the key word "angry fuck" or similar | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " I agree with you in part Firstly you are asking this on a swingers site where bi sexuality is common and whereup folks in here are less coded and more open minded I think that society has always more accepted bisexuality and gayness is women but due to religion ale on male sexual attraction is more taboo | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post
Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time "Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post
Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time
Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason."Fellas cum on now just kiss and make up, this public flirting is to much... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post
Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time
Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason."Ok obviously you can't take sarcasm in any form and are sensitive and if you are wound up that easily then I feel sorry for you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not seedy no, but in general two women together is a top male fantasy, yet two men together isn't as high up in the list of women's fantasies, got nothing to do with seediness, I guess different sexes just have different turn ons" This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh"I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post
Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time
Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason.
Ok obviously you can't take sarcasm in any form and are sensitive and if you are wound up that easily then I feel sorry for you "Don't gaslight me like that, into thinking I'm the one who's angry and wound up just because I dared to have a different opinion to you. You're clearly being provocative in your choice of words now and it's clear I'm not going to get an intelligent discussion out of you anymore. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. "Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too.
Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really "That’s your opinion  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too.
Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really
That’s your opinion "Objectively really. If I say I don't want to see a certain thing (bisexual men) and expect others (straight women) that don't want to see it (bisexual women) to see it anyway, it's a double standard. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too.
Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really
That’s your opinion "Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post
Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time
Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason.
Ok obviously you can't take sarcasm in any form and are sensitive and if you are wound up that easily then I feel sorry for you
Don't gaslight me like that, into thinking I'm the one who's angry and wound up just because I dared to have a different opinion to you. You're clearly being provocative in your choice of words now and it's clear I'm not going to get an intelligent discussion out of you anymore."You pretty much said you were wound up in previous reply and it seems the only one that had a issue here is you because it's definitely not me
It's hard to have an intelligent covo with someone that doesn't understand the difference between being serious and being sarcastic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too.
Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really
That’s your opinion
Objectively really. If I say I don't want to see a certain thing (bisexual men) and expect others (straight women) that don't want to see it (bisexual women) to see it anyway, it's a double standard."I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too.
Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really
That’s your opinion
Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one "And some definitely smell better than others | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean "I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post
Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time
Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason.
Ok obviously you can't take sarcasm in any form and are sensitive and if you are wound up that easily then I feel sorry for you
Don't gaslight me like that, into thinking I'm the one who's angry and wound up just because I dared to have a different opinion to you. You're clearly being provocative in your choice of words now and it's clear I'm not going to get an intelligent discussion out of you anymore.
You pretty much said you were wound up in previous reply and it seems the only one that had a issue here is you because it's definitely not me
It's hard to have an intelligent covo with someone that doesn't understand the difference between being serious and being sarcastic. "Part of being sarcastic is doing it well | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up."You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all
Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn.
Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post
Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time
Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason.
Ok obviously you can't take sarcasm in any form and are sensitive and if you are wound up that easily then I feel sorry for you
Don't gaslight me like that, into thinking I'm the one who's angry and wound up just because I dared to have a different opinion to you. You're clearly being provocative in your choice of words now and it's clear I'm not going to get an intelligent discussion out of you anymore.
You pretty much said you were wound up in previous reply and it seems the only one that had a issue here is you because it's definitely not me
It's hard to have an intelligent covo with someone that doesn't understand the difference between being serious and being sarcastic.
Part of being sarcastic is doing it well"I'll have you know I passed my sarcasm test before you were out of nappies | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. "There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lads. Come on. Leave it there, yeah? It's not worth the head space you are both giving it at this point. "I'm done now. You're right, it's not worth it a no one's come out smelling of roses as a result. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too.
Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really
That’s your opinion
Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one
And some definitely smell better than others "That all depends on sense of smell | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that "Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too.
Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really
That’s your opinion
Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one
And some definitely smell better than others
That all depends on sense of smell "Long covid unfortunately didn't help me there, my sisters ex could clear Albert Hall | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Oh yeah and blokes are arseholes too (see above) That's a joke boys before you start trying to lay into me" I was going to agree, everyone can be a arsehole if they want to be and I did see it as a joke so all good | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too.
Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really
That’s your opinion
Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one
And some definitely smell better than others
That all depends on sense of smell
Long covid unfortunately didn't help me there, my sisters ex could clear Albert Hall "Gas mask required or not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You’ll both be over my knee in a minute ffs! " I said you could have 1 min but you lost your opportunity, try again in 10 years
Ps I'll give him a big man hug when I see him and all will be forgotten | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too.
Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really
That’s your opinion
Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one
And some definitely smell better than others
That all depends on sense of smell
Long covid unfortunately didn't help me there, my sisters ex could clear Albert Hall
Gas mask required or not "I think he'd break through a mask | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them
So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it
Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble
You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same
When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh
I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too.
Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really
That’s your opinion
Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one
And some definitely smell better than others
That all depends on sense of smell
Long covid unfortunately didn't help me there, my sisters ex could clear Albert Hall
Gas mask required or not
I think he'd break through a mask "Won't be visiting the Albert Hall any time soon then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nope and if I'm honest it's post that continue to fuel this perception that hurts the acceptance of bisexual men. That's not a pop at you OP nut there is a stigma that's undeniable so we must be positive in normalising anyone sexuality" Thanks. The point of the post was to see if there is such a perception. People who hold this view won’t change it and I don’t see it encouraging them. If anything it might show them that their view isn’t as widely held as they hoped. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nope and if I'm honest it's post that continue to fuel this perception that hurts the acceptance of bisexual men. That's not a pop at you OP nut there is a stigma that's undeniable so we must be positive in normalising anyone sexuality Thanks. The point of the post was to see if there is such a perception. People who hold this view won’t change it and I don’t see it encouraging them. If anything it might show them that their view isn’t as widely held as they hoped. " Sadly mate i think it is. Its the whole (without sounding woke) toxic masculinity bloke culture. That said some of the nastiest comments and messages I get (here) are from women.sone who are bi themselves
I'm openly bi, ex military very much the archetypal man's man. I rarely vet questioned to ny face surprisingly lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Bisexual men is such a turn on! But I think society deems it as dirty - or that they're promiscuous. Bisexuality in women's seems more accepted by society, weirdly. X" This is the way | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about "Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lads. Come on. Leave it there, yeah? It's not worth the head space you are both giving it at this point. "The man of reason. Also the man with the most kissable face. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? "Touching yourself again? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? "Do I look like a masochist? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
Do I look like a masochist?"Hey we all have our kinks, I won't judge. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
Touching yourself again? "Saving it for later. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
Do I look like a masochist?"What does a masochist look like?! Asking for a friend.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why have so many people got out of the wrong side of bed this morning? Stop moaning, sun's out and it's nearly the day to eat Easter eggs all day long! "Well, my excuse is because the dam sun is out!!! And Easter eggs suck ass. Is summer over yet?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
Touching yourself again?
Saving it for later."I'll let you know when I've waxed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? "It's oozing wait that's the precum | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
To be honest, both men and women face challenges with their bisexuality and women, I can imagine it's often dismissed as it just being a phase but in society, I think it is less accepted for men and it may result in fewer sexual partners due to an existing stigma of men having sex with other men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why have so many people got out of the wrong side of bed this morning? Stop moaning, sun's out and it's nearly the day to eat Easter eggs all day long!
Well, my excuse is because the dam sun is out!!! And Easter eggs suck ass.
Is summer over yet??"I'll send you a chocolate cock instead. Summers not even begun | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
It's oozing wait that's the precum"That's good for decoupage | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why have so many people got out of the wrong side of bed this morning? Stop moaning, sun's out and it's nearly the day to eat Easter eggs all day long!
Well, my excuse is because the dam sun is out!!! And Easter eggs suck ass.
Is summer over yet??
I'll send you a chocolate cock instead.
Summers not even begun "FML I'll take the choccy cock though. Thanks! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
It's oozing wait that's the precum
That's good for decoupage "Be careful of those papercuts though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok, this is me wiping the slate clean now as I've realised I never actually answered the OP
To be honest, both men and women face challenges with their bisexuality and women, I can imagine it's often dismissed as it just being a phase but in society, I think it is less accepted for men and it may result in fewer sexual partners due to an existing stigma of men having sex with other men."I'll agree with you mostly, didn't see that coming now did you 
I think it gives more options for sex though but I guess depends if open about it and who with.
I do think people shouldn't judge others based on who they sleep with but people can't always control how they feel about things.
Ps I you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
It's oozing wait that's the precum
That's good for decoupage
Be careful of those papercuts though "You had to go there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok, this is me wiping the slate clean now as I've realised I never actually answered the OP
To be honest, both men and women face challenges with their bisexuality and women, I can imagine it's often dismissed as it just being a phase but in society, I think it is less accepted for men and it may result in fewer sexual partners due to an existing stigma of men having sex with other men.
I'll agree with you mostly, didn't see that coming now did you
I think it gives more options for sex though but I guess depends if open about it and who with.
I do think people shouldn't judge others based on who they sleep with but people can't always control how they feel about things.
Ps I you"What do you mean "mostly"?
I'm joking, I'm exhausted | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok, this is me wiping the slate clean now as I've realised I never actually answered the OP
To be honest, both men and women face challenges with their bisexuality and women, I can imagine it's often dismissed as it just being a phase but in society, I think it is less accepted for men and it may result in fewer sexual partners due to an existing stigma of men having sex with other men.
I'll agree with you mostly, didn't see that coming now did you
I think it gives more options for sex though but I guess depends if open about it and who with.
I do think people shouldn't judge others based on who they sleep with but people can't always control how they feel about things.
Ps I you
What do you mean "mostly"?
I'm joking, I'm exhausted"I'm sorry for draining you so early in the morning, I promise to be gentle in the future | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No not at all. But I'd question how attracted a bi man was to me. And that's most definitely and insecurity of mine but would make men who are straight more appealing to me in a one to one scenario. " Off topic but you look incredible xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I for one am in full support of all the bisexual men. And if you happen to be a bisexual male and have a beard/stubble, a few tattoos maybe, those sexy little vlines then please do get in touch. " Except your filters prevent it lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
It's oozing wait that's the precum
That's good for decoupage
Be careful of those papercuts though
You had to go there "Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
It's oozing wait that's the precum
That's good for decoupage
Be careful of those papercuts though
You had to go there
Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug "Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
It's oozing wait that's the precum
That's good for decoupage
Be careful of those papercuts though
You had to go there
Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug
Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level "Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
It's oozing wait that's the precum
That's good for decoupage
Be careful of those papercuts though
You had to go there
Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug
Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level
Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
It's oozing wait that's the precum
That's good for decoupage
Be careful of those papercuts though
You had to go there
Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug
Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level
Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet
"Man of your calibre I'm sure you'll cope | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
It's oozing wait that's the precum
That's good for decoupage
Be careful of those papercuts though
You had to go there
Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug
Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level
Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet
Man of your calibre I'm sure you'll cope "I don't think any guy can cope with papercuts on his cock | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Can I just say that there are a lot of fit and gorgeously sexy bisexual people in this thread.. "Yourself included | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
It's oozing wait that's the precum
That's good for decoupage
Be careful of those papercuts though
You had to go there
Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug
Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level
Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet
Man of your calibre I'm sure you'll cope
I don't think any guy can cope with papercuts on his cock "Two bulls could | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
It's oozing wait that's the precum
That's good for decoupage
Be careful of those papercuts though
You had to go there
Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug
Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level
Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet
Man of your calibre I'm sure you'll cope
I don't think any guy can cope with papercuts on his cock
Two bulls could "Oh how I miss him | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean
I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up.
You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either.
There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that
Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social.
Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about
Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension?
It's oozing wait that's the precum
That's good for decoupage
Be careful of those papercuts though
You had to go there
Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug
Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level
Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet
Man of your calibre I'm sure you'll cope
I don't think any guy can cope with papercuts on his cock
Two bulls could
Oh how I miss him "I do as well, I have a big void in my soul | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
