FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Do women actually...
Do women actually...
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Exist, or is the whole thing a conspiracy theory?
I mean were they genetically engineered in a lab somewhere and accidentally released into the environment?
Are reports of actual woman sightings just a cryptozoological hoax?
Where's the historical evidence?
Discuss
_____________________________
NB. An views expressed above are for the purpose of intellectual debate. Any opportunity to use the above to mank on about messages not read/replied to is purely coincidental.
No animals were harmed inbthe making of this thread.
_____________________________ |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Well... there is one asleep on my settee... I'll go give it a poke and see what happens  "
Careful ... legend has it they resort to rational argument as a defence mechanism. It might get messy |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Dee was out last night dogging. She was dressed up warm in men's joggers top and jacket but is deffo female.oh she did get fucked also by 3 males."
I have seen many reported sightings such as this, but where is the evidence? Footprints, hair samples, nests, droppings, that sort of thing. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I read on the Internet, so it must be true, that women are actually alien lizard creatures seeking to take over the world....  "
See .... a credible theory at last! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"There were a few reported sightings of UFO* close to where I live but not officially confirmed so I don’t know.
* Unidentified Female Oddity "
It's also tantalising |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *otSoPoshWoman
over a year ago
In a ball gown because that's how we roll in N. Devon |
"Well... there is one asleep on my settee... I'll go give it a poke and see what happens
Careful ... legend has it they resort to rational argument as a defence mechanism. It might get messy"
Jebus 
Maybe I'll leave it asleep |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The historical evidence for the existence of women is reasonably sketchy. If you take the historical texts at their word, women were a relatively rare and obscure beast, mentioned infrequently at all, and even less frequently by name.
In some cultures you would find female names used as a pejorative, and constructs such as "wife of" "sister of" "daughter of". It is not always clear whether these entities were genuinely women, or whether in the distant past there were non-human entities which fulfilled the functions of breeding and societal acceptability, while also chewing up resources and sometimes weaving when babies weren't being spat out. I'm imagining a sewing machine with an incubator. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"The historical evidence for the existence of women is reasonably sketchy. If you take the historical texts at their word, women were a relatively rare and obscure beast, mentioned infrequently at all, and even less frequently by name.
In some cultures you would find female names used as a pejorative, and constructs such as "wife of" "sister of" "daughter of". It is not always clear whether these entities were genuinely women, or whether in the distant past there were non-human entities which fulfilled the functions of breeding and societal acceptability, while also chewing up resources and sometimes weaving when babies weren't being spat out. I'm imagining a sewing machine with an incubator."
A very insightful contribution. The mystery goes on. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The historical evidence for the existence of women is reasonably sketchy. If you take the historical texts at their word, women were a relatively rare and obscure beast, mentioned infrequently at all, and even less frequently by name.
In some cultures you would find female names used as a pejorative, and constructs such as "wife of" "sister of" "daughter of". It is not always clear whether these entities were genuinely women, or whether in the distant past there were non-human entities which fulfilled the functions of breeding and societal acceptability, while also chewing up resources and sometimes weaving when babies weren't being spat out. I'm imagining a sewing machine with an incubator.
A very insightful contribution. The mystery goes on."
Sometimes these entities malfunctioned and didn't produce a son. Fortunately many of these cultures had a mechanism to deal with the results of these malfunctions, called "exposure".
Weirdly, celebrity did not seem to result from this, nor lots of clicks. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"The historical evidence for the existence of women is reasonably sketchy. If you take the historical texts at their word, women were a relatively rare and obscure beast, mentioned infrequently at all, and even less frequently by name.
In some cultures you would find female names used as a pejorative, and constructs such as "wife of" "sister of" "daughter of". It is not always clear whether these entities were genuinely women, or whether in the distant past there were non-human entities which fulfilled the functions of breeding and societal acceptability, while also chewing up resources and sometimes weaving when babies weren't being spat out. I'm imagining a sewing machine with an incubator.
A very insightful contribution. The mystery goes on."
I know legend speaks of one that launched a thousand ships, but I think the story is allegorical. Highly unlikely in reality.
If they ever existed, why are there no fossils? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The historical evidence for the existence of women is reasonably sketchy. If you take the historical texts at their word, women were a relatively rare and obscure beast, mentioned infrequently at all, and even less frequently by name.
In some cultures you would find female names used as a pejorative, and constructs such as "wife of" "sister of" "daughter of". It is not always clear whether these entities were genuinely women, or whether in the distant past there were non-human entities which fulfilled the functions of breeding and societal acceptability, while also chewing up resources and sometimes weaving when babies weren't being spat out. I'm imagining a sewing machine with an incubator.
A very insightful contribution. The mystery goes on.
I know legend speaks of one that launched a thousand ships, but I think the story is allegorical. Highly unlikely in reality.
If they ever existed, why are there no fossils? "
It's actually quite surprising, that most of the very famous women named in very ancient texts likely did not exist in any meaningful form.
Most of the historical evidence to back that particular story up is, like... a civilisation existed with commonalities across a few different settlements. A lot of the details - the use of chariots, for example - is clearly and factually wrong. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Full disclosure ... I think I saw one once. But it was dark, and visibility was poor. So couldn't properly authenticate.lol could have been a trannie  "
Exactly |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Apparently I am a woman. I'm very shocked. I thought I was a guy with big moobs.
I drink beer, eat curry and kebabs, work security, wear suits, swear and fart. I can't be a woman. Please tell them they are wrong.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Apparently I am a woman. I'm very shocked. I thought I was a guy with big moobs.
I drink beer, eat curry and kebabs, work security, wear suits, swear and fart. I can't be a woman. Please tell them they are wrong.
"
See, you claim that, but where's the proof? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"They're always in the last place you look 
Well.
I've not checked in my pants yet 
I thought you were looking for a woman, not a lost monster munch  "
Well, I do know that Monster Munch exist. Not in my pants though. The pickled onion flavour gets a bit stingy  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
