Men... You walk into a gents.. There are two urinals.. Theres someone already cock out at urinal 1...do you.. Wait.. Go to u2 and unzip and just wait till flow starts... Take a sneak peak and see how you compare.. Avoid peeing too hard to avoid communal splash back...
Women.. Theres two paper thin stalls... With no sound proofing One is occupado... Do you wait? Exit and return when the interloper is gone..? Go to stall2, squat down and let it rain? Worry about the noise and whether you might know the occupant of trap 1?
How does it flow for folks? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago
East London |
I don't think women care so much about who is in the next toilet.
I don't take any notice of who is peeing next to me as I'm busy doing my own thing.
Although, I do remember when I worked in a school a teacher ran into the next toilet and noisily squeezed out a huge poop, washed her hands and ran out in about 30 seconds.
That was in the lesson changeover. I remember thinking how relieved she must feel now. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Good question.
I would go into cubicle 2 right away, thus avoiding the pee'er whose identity I don't know getting to know me the intendedpee....
The intending to pee would listen carefully to how far through the process the pee'er was.
If the peer is too silent , indicating that they are mid number 2. I would immediately vacate the secrecy of the cubicle and head off promptly as I wouldn't want to be held responsible by a third party for the stench that may be in the air after the pee'er / pooer had left the vicinity leaving me to take the blaming looks and lack of eye contact.
If the pee'er is mid pee.. I'd pee. They are half a pee ahead of me and by the time they flush I am finished peeing and in the process of wipe, knickers up and flush while they have finished soaping up and hitting the hand drier.
I will then wait for them to LEAVE before coming out of my cubicle and maintaining my secret visit.
I have NEVER poo'd in a public toilet and don't get the urge. Not even in anyone elses house..... save my daughters on a long stay.
Psychologists analyse that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Good question.
I would go into cubicle 2 right away, thus avoiding the pee'er whose identity I don't know getting to know me the intendedpee....
The intending to pee would listen carefully to how far through the process the pee'er was.
If the peer is too silent , indicating that they are mid number 2. I would immediately vacate the secrecy of the cubicle and head off promptly as I wouldn't want to be held responsible by a third party for the stench that may be in the air after the pee'er / pooer had left the vicinity leaving me to take the blaming looks and lack of eye contact.
If the pee'er is mid pee.. I'd pee. They are half a pee ahead of me and by the time they flush I am finished peeing and in the process of wipe, knickers up and flush while they have finished soaping up and hitting the hand drier.
I will then wait for them to LEAVE before coming out of my cubicle and maintaining my secret visit.
I have NEVER poo'd in a public toilet and don't get the urge. Not even in anyone elses house..... save my daughters on a long stay.
Psychologists analyse that."
Freud would suggest something happened in the formative years of your childhood, particularly in the anal stage, leading you to be retentive  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Good question.
I would go into cubicle 2 right away, thus avoiding the pee'er whose identity I don't know getting to know me the intendedpee....
The intending to pee would listen carefully to how far through the process the pee'er was.
If the peer is too silent , indicating that they are mid number 2. I would immediately vacate the secrecy of the cubicle and head off promptly as I wouldn't want to be held responsible by a third party for the stench that may be in the air after the pee'er / pooer had left the vicinity leaving me to take the blaming looks and lack of eye contact.
If the pee'er is mid pee.. I'd pee. They are half a pee ahead of me and by the time they flush I am finished peeing and in the process of wipe, knickers up and flush while they have finished soaping up and hitting the hand drier.
I will then wait for them to LEAVE before coming out of my cubicle and maintaining my secret visit.
I have NEVER poo'd in a public toilet and don't get the urge. Not even in anyone elses house..... save my daughters on a long stay.
Psychologists analyse that.
Freud would suggest something happened in the formative years of your childhood, particularly in the anal stage, leading you to be retentive "
Damn! Another discredited theory for Freud. ..... or maybe not.. Shit stinks and tells me so much about a persons diet....... disgusting.
I will not allow myself to be judged by those I judge !
What does Freud think of that ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Good question.
I would go into cubicle 2 right away, thus avoiding the pee'er whose identity I don't know getting to know me the intendedpee....
The intending to pee would listen carefully to how far through the process the pee'er was.
If the peer is too silent , indicating that they are mid number 2. I would immediately vacate the secrecy of the cubicle and head off promptly as I wouldn't want to be held responsible by a third party for the stench that may be in the air after the pee'er / pooer had left the vicinity leaving me to take the blaming looks and lack of eye contact.
If the pee'er is mid pee.. I'd pee. They are half a pee ahead of me and by the time they flush I am finished peeing and in the process of wipe, knickers up and flush while they have finished soaping up and hitting the hand drier.
I will then wait for them to LEAVE before coming out of my cubicle and maintaining my secret visit.
I have NEVER poo'd in a public toilet and don't get the urge. Not even in anyone elses house..... save my daughters on a long stay.
Psychologists analyse that.
Freud would suggest something happened in the formative years of your childhood, particularly in the anal stage, leading you to be retentive
Damn! Another discredited theory for Freud. ..... or maybe not.. Shit stinks and tells me so much about a persons diet....... disgusting.
I will not allow myself to be judged by those I judge !
What does Freud think of that ?"
Not sure tbh, I’ll research and get back to you  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
