FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Profile pet hates
Profile pet hates
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *eyeYCouple
over a year ago
Nr Leicester |
"Couples with only a cock pic of the man or zero.
Shouty demanding profiles.
Will fill in later, been on over a year.
Only cock or close up vag pics.
Mrs"
Yup!! Utterly indiscernible pics other than the gynae ones in addition  
To be fair it does serve as a good filter and not that we can judge at the moment  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nkyCplCouple
over a year ago
Northampton |
"The sizest comments from people either on the forums or on their profiles
I’m not sure what sizest means? Is it in reference to cock size?
As is like body sizes "
Do you have any examples of what you perceive to be “sizest”? I’ve never heard of that term before and can’t say I’ve seen anything like that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *iasubTV/TS
over a year ago
Ilkeston |
"The sizest comments from people either on the forums or on their profiles
I’m not sure what sizest means? Is it in reference to cock size?"
It is someone who discriminates on the basis of a person's size, esp against people considered to be overweight
Not sure ive really ever seen it here though |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The sizest comments from people either on the forums or on their profiles
I’m not sure what sizest means? Is it in reference to cock size?
As is like body sizes
Do you have any examples of what you perceive to be “sizest”? I’ve never heard of that term before and can’t say I’ve seen anything like that."
Leave us fat cunts alone  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The sizest comments from people either on the forums or on their profiles
I’m not sure what sizest means? Is it in reference to cock size?
It is someone who discriminates on the basis of a person's size, esp against people considered to be overweight
Not sure ive really ever seen it here though "
I’ve seen it on a fair few profiles and a lot of forum threads but can’t pick out an example off the top of my head |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nkyCplCouple
over a year ago
Northampton |
"The sizest comments from people either on the forums or on their profiles
I’m not sure what sizest means? Is it in reference to cock size?
It is someone who discriminates on the basis of a person's size, esp against people considered to be overweight
Not sure ive really ever seen it here though "
I mean we don’t like fat people, we also don’t like overly skinny people. I wouldn’t say that’s “sizest” though and like you I haven’t seen anyone discriminate people due to their size. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nkyCplCouple
over a year ago
Northampton |
"The sizest comments from people either on the forums or on their profiles
I’m not sure what sizest means? Is it in reference to cock size?
It is someone who discriminates on the basis of a person's size, esp against people considered to be overweight
Not sure ive really ever seen it here though
I’ve seen it on a fair few profiles and a lot of forum threads but can’t pick out an example off the top of my head"
Would you say my comment, or our profile was sizest? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nkyCplCouple
over a year ago
Northampton |
"The sizest comments from people either on the forums or on their profiles
I’m not sure what sizest means? Is it in reference to cock size?
As is like body sizes
Do you have any examples of what you perceive to be “sizest”? I’ve never heard of that term before and can’t say I’ve seen anything like that.
Leave us fat cunts alone "
I really want to send a sarccy reply, but I guarantee some sensitive soul would take offence and I’d get banned. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The sizest comments from people either on the forums or on their profiles
I’m not sure what sizest means? Is it in reference to cock size?
As is like body sizes
Do you have any examples of what you perceive to be “sizest”? I’ve never heard of that term before and can’t say I’ve seen anything like that.
Leave us fat cunts alone
I really want to send a sarccy reply, but I guarantee some sensitive soul would take offence and I’d get banned. "
It's just banter |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *iasubTV/TS
over a year ago
Ilkeston |
"The sizest comments from people either on the forums or on their profiles
I’m not sure what sizest means? Is it in reference to cock size?
It is someone who discriminates on the basis of a person's size, esp against people considered to be overweight
Not sure ive really ever seen it here though
I mean we don’t like fat people, we also don’t like overly skinny people. I wouldn’t say that’s “sizest” though and like you I haven’t seen anyone discriminate people due to their size."
We all have preferences of who we like and thats a good thing. As long as people dont go out and deliberately offend people because of X reason then theres no issue in my view personally. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nkyCplCouple
over a year ago
Northampton |
"The sizest comments from people either on the forums or on their profiles
I’m not sure what sizest means? Is it in reference to cock size?
As is like body sizes
Do you have any examples of what you perceive to be “sizest”? I’ve never heard of that term before and can’t say I’ve seen anything like that.
Leave us fat cunts alone
I really want to send a sarccy reply, but I guarantee some sensitive soul would take offence and I’d get banned.
It's just banter "
It’s not bullying, it’s character building! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The sizest comments from people either on the forums or on their profiles
I’m not sure what sizest means? Is it in reference to cock size?
It is someone who discriminates on the basis of a person's size, esp against people considered to be overweight
Not sure ive really ever seen it here though
I’ve seen it on a fair few profiles and a lot of forum threads but can’t pick out an example off the top of my head
Would you say my comment, or our profile was sizest?"
No I wouldn’t say it’s sizest it’s more the single male profiles that say it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nkyCplCouple
over a year ago
Northampton |
"The sizest comments from people either on the forums or on their profiles
I’m not sure what sizest means? Is it in reference to cock size?
It is someone who discriminates on the basis of a person's size, esp against people considered to be overweight
Not sure ive really ever seen it here though
I’ve seen it on a fair few profiles and a lot of forum threads but can’t pick out an example off the top of my head
Would you say my comment, or our profile was sizest?
No I wouldn’t say it’s sizest it’s more the single male profiles that say it"
I can’t say I’ve seen it tbh bud. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The Facebook one maybe as it's so daft, but I don't get the hate for the 'Sydney uni' line. People have a right to a disclaimer of some sort, and it's not actually as dumb as it sounds.
Probably the thing in profiles that I dislike the most is when people grumble about other people's!
And grumbling about other people too - I find a list of 'timewasters' really off-putting, whatever they may have done (or not done). pt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"When they put others down to showcase their own 'preferences'.
Can’t say I’ve seen this yet either. People really do that?  "
Have to say, we've noticed it a few times. Particularly around race and penis size...
Like, we appreciate everyone has a preference and not everyone finds everyone attractive. That's totally understandable, heck, we've been turned down a good few times ourselves, but no-one has ever been rude or resorted to put downs. Just not necessary really.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nkyCplCouple
over a year ago
Northampton |
"The Facebook one maybe as it's so daft, but I don't get the hate for the 'Sydney uni' line. People have a right to a disclaimer of some sort, and it's not actually as dumb as it sounds.
Probably the thing in profiles that I dislike the most is when people grumble about other people's!
And grumbling about other people too - I find a list of 'timewasters' really off-putting, whatever they may have done (or not done). pt"
What’s the reason for the Sydney thing anyway? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nkyCplCouple
over a year ago
Northampton |
"When they put others down to showcase their own 'preferences'.
Can’t say I’ve seen this yet either. People really do that?
Have to say, we've noticed it a few times. Particularly around race and penis size...
Like, we appreciate everyone has a preference and not everyone finds everyone attractive. That's totally understandable, heck, we've been turned down a good few times ourselves, but no-one has ever been rude or resorted to put downs. Just not necessary really.."
I’m rather proud of my 3 inch destroyer |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The Facebook one maybe as it's so daft, but I don't get the hate for the 'Sydney uni' line. People have a right to a disclaimer of some sort, and it's not actually as dumb as it sounds.
Probably the thing in profiles that I dislike the most is when people grumble about other people's!
And grumbling about other people too - I find a list of 'timewasters' really off-putting, whatever they may have done (or not done). pt
What’s the reason for the Sydney thing anyway? "
--Apparently someone (or some group) down there did a study on the site once and referenced some profiles. People are clearly just bouncing off that for their own disclaimer though. And they're entitled to do that imo, and however they want to (though the Facebook ones don't make sense I admit - it doesn't own Fab at all). I don't get why some people dislike these so much, to the point they'll even say in their own profiles. Fabs terms (which I thought when I looked were good ones) could and probably have changed too, so no worries if someone wants to add or append their own. People who say it's legal "nonsense" are wrong.
I was graphic designer years ago (will be again soon), and when I had to pinch things off the net sometimes (photos of things you can't get in time that you can crop usually), you always looked for things where ownership isn't mentioned at all (despite pre-existing copyright laws) - it just makes sense. --pt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The Facebook one maybe as it's so daft, but I don't get the hate for the 'Sydney uni' line. People have a right to a disclaimer of some sort, and it's not actually as dumb as it sounds.
Probably the thing in profiles that I dislike the most is when people grumble about other people's!
And grumbling about other people too - I find a list of 'timewasters' really off-putting, whatever they may have done (or not done). pt
What’s the reason for the Sydney thing anyway?
--Apparently someone (or some group) down there did a study on the site once and referenced some profiles. People are clearly just bouncing off that for their own disclaimer though. And they're entitled to do that imo, and however they want to (though the Facebook ones don't make sense I admit - it doesn't own Fab at all). I don't get why some people dislike these so much, to the point they'll even say in their own profiles. Fabs terms (which I thought when I looked were good ones) could and probably have changed too, so no worries if someone wants to add or append their own. People who say it's legal "nonsense" are wrong.
I was graphic designer years ago (will be again soon), and when I had to pinch things off the net sometimes (photos of things you can't get in time that you can crop usually), you always looked for things where ownership isn't mentioned at all (despite pre-existing copyright laws) - it just makes sense. --pt"
So basically you infringe copyright |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The Facebook one maybe as it's so daft, but I don't get the hate for the 'Sydney uni' line. People have a right to a disclaimer of some sort, and it's not actually as dumb as it sounds.
Probably the thing in profiles that I dislike the most is when people grumble about other people's!
And grumbling about other people too - I find a list of 'timewasters' really off-putting, whatever they may have done (or not done). pt
What’s the reason for the Sydney thing anyway?
--Apparently someone (or some group) down there did a study on the site once and referenced some profiles. People are clearly just bouncing off that for their own disclaimer though. And they're entitled to do that imo, and however they want to (though the Facebook ones don't make sense I admit - it doesn't own Fab at all). I don't get why some people dislike these so much, to the point they'll even say in their own profiles. Fabs terms (which I thought when I looked were good ones) could and probably have changed too, so no worries if someone wants to add or append their own. People who say it's legal "nonsense" are wrong.
I was graphic designer years ago (will be again soon), and when I had to pinch things off the net sometimes (photos of things you can't get in time that you can crop usually), you always looked for things where ownership isn't mentioned at all (despite pre-existing copyright laws) - it just makes sense. --pt
So basically you infringe copyright"
? pt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"When they put others down to showcase their own 'preferences'.
Can’t say I’ve seen this yet either. People really do that? "
I haven’t either. Unless people mean ”no this” or “no that”‘ or “I prefer this or that” etc. some see stating preferences as putting others down. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The Facebook one maybe as it's so daft, but I don't get the hate for the 'Sydney uni' line. People have a right to a disclaimer of some sort, and it's not actually as dumb as it sounds.
Probably the thing in profiles that I dislike the most is when people grumble about other people's!
And grumbling about other people too - I find a list of 'timewasters' really off-putting, whatever they may have done (or not done). pt
What’s the reason for the Sydney thing anyway?
--Apparently someone (or some group) down there did a study on the site once and referenced some profiles. People are clearly just bouncing off that for their own disclaimer though. And they're entitled to do that imo, and however they want to (though the Facebook ones don't make sense I admit - it doesn't own Fab at all). I don't get why some people dislike these so much, to the point they'll even say in their own profiles. Fabs terms (which I thought when I looked were good ones) could and probably have changed too, so no worries if someone wants to add or append their own. People who say it's legal "nonsense" are wrong.
I was graphic designer years ago (will be again soon), and when I had to pinch things off the net sometimes (photos of things you can't get in time that you can crop usually), you always looked for things where ownership isn't mentioned at all (despite pre-existing copyright laws) - it just makes sense. --pt
So basically you infringe copyright
? pt"
It's always good to add your own line if it matters to you. Natural law is ambiguous and says nothing about intent. It can be used to withdraw stuff, but that could be too late. pt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nkyCplCouple
over a year ago
Northampton |
"When they put others down to showcase their own 'preferences'.
Can’t say I’ve seen this yet either. People really do that?
I haven’t either. Unless people mean ”no this” or “no that”‘ or “I prefer this or that” etc. some see stating preferences as putting others down. "
Yea that’s all I can think of and if that is the case people need to toughen up imo. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Hung only, have these people never experienced the delight of a average lenth but girthy penis?
Or slightly below and “slim” "
As long as it hits the spots, I don't see why some want their cervix to take a beating  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The Facebook one maybe as it's so daft, but I don't get the hate for the 'Sydney uni' line. People have a right to a disclaimer of some sort, and it's not actually as dumb as it sounds.
Probably the thing in profiles that I dislike the most is when people grumble about other people's!
And grumbling about other people too - I find a list of 'timewasters' really off-putting, whatever they may have done (or not done). pt
What’s the reason for the Sydney thing anyway?
--Apparently someone (or some group) down there did a study on the site once and referenced some profiles. People are clearly just bouncing off that for their own disclaimer though. And they're entitled to do that imo, and however they want to (though the Facebook ones don't make sense I admit - it doesn't own Fab at all). I don't get why some people dislike these so much, to the point they'll even say in their own profiles. Fabs terms (which I thought when I looked were good ones) could and probably have changed too, so no worries if someone wants to add or append their own. People who say it's legal "nonsense" are wrong.
I was graphic designer years ago (will be again soon), and when I had to pinch things off the net sometimes (photos of things you can't get in time that you can crop usually), you always looked for things where ownership isn't mentioned at all (despite pre-existing copyright laws) - it just makes sense. --pt
So basically you infringe copyright
? pt
It's always good to add your own line if it matters to you. Natural law is ambiguous and says nothing about intent. It can be used to withdraw stuff, but that could be too late. pt"
There is absolutely no ambiguity in the UK, and many other countries, regarding copyright
I've got absolutely no idea why you're referring to natural law, I suspect it isn't what you think it is |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
There is absolutely no ambiguity in the UK, and many other countries, regarding copyright
I've got absolutely no idea why you're referring to natural law, I suspect it isn't what you think it is
"
Why don't you attempt to explain where I am wrong then, instead of being so rudely terse?
'Natural' just means the form of natural copyright that exists without being asked for (or indeed being displayed), and 'ambiguous' means that natural copyright doesn't explain (or indeed even know) people's actual intention regard their stuff.
All I am saying is that these disclaimers are simply about people explaining (or attempting to explain) their intentions. Sorry if they are a "pet hate" of yours too, but really what is wrong with that?
pt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
There is absolutely no ambiguity in the UK, and many other countries, regarding copyright
I've got absolutely no idea why you're referring to natural law, I suspect it isn't what you think it is
Why don't you attempt to explain where I am wrong then, instead of being so rudely terse?
'Natural' just means the form of natural copyright that exists without being asked for (or indeed being displayed), and 'ambiguous' means that natural copyright doesn't explain (or indeed even know) people's actual intention regard their stuff.
All I am saying is that these disclaimers are simply about people explaining (or attempting to explain) their intentions. Sorry if they are a "pet hate" of yours too, but really what is wrong with that?
pt"
You cannot just assume what a person's intentions are with regard to copyright, seems like you've invented a law to allow you to grab anything you want |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
