FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC).
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does it matter at all what gender someone identifies as?" absolutely, especially if your son or daughter at age 16 decide to change gender without serious consideration or thought | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No but considering a rapist can legally change their gender using this law and then force their victim to use female (or male ) pro nouns during court proceedings is just ridiculous. But then with the SNP why would any be surprised " The victims in such cases usually record their testimony in advance, and as they would be discussing the events from their point of view there'd be zero legal requirement to refer to the defendant as either him or her as long as it is made clear that they are referring to the person in question. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" someone from England can pop over the border for 3 months, change sex then back to England or where ever " I don’t think that has been decided yet has it? There was a BBC article a couple of days ago which stated that the UK government may well decide to not recognise a Scottish GRC. Just because something is lawful in Scotland does not mean it is lawful in the rest of the UK. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't see what the issue is. It's only an option to change paperwork. My daughter is nearing 16, if she wants to identify as a tree, so be it. " Yes, so be it as far as she's concerned. But what about when it impinges on others. What if she only wants to attend a school for trees? Or wants pruning on the NHS? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes, so be it as far as she's concerned. But what about when it impinges on others. What if she only wants to attend a school for trees? Or wants pruning on the NHS?" How is that impinging on others? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" In Scotland the parliament will not send a young person under the age of 25 to jail when they commit a crime because they say the brain is not fully developed until 25 years of age. " I know this isn't the point of your thread. But parliaments don't send people to prison, courts do. People under 25 are sent to prison. A quick Google suggests 2 study recommended courts consider whether custodial sentences are suitable in sone crimes when the perpetrator is under 25 if immaturity is a factor. But that's not the dramatic comparison you are seeking is it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"a guy could use all female facilities changing rooms toilets apply for a job as a female they can be sent to a female prison rather than male prison " If someone identifies as a female whst is wrong with them using female facilities or toilets or applying for a job as their chosen gender? Or being sent to a female prison? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does it matter at all what gender someone identifies as? absolutely, especially if your son or daughter at age 16 decide to change gender without serious consideration or thought" I doubt very much if at all any person decided to take such a massively life affecting step without a huge amount of consideration and reflection on what they were thinking.. Of course a younger person may not discuss it with their parents or guardians at the very early stages, but they may well do with their peers or others they know who have been there or are going through it.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't see what the issue is. It's only an option to change paperwork. My daughter is nearing 16, if she wants to identify as a tree, so be it. Yes, so be it as far as she's concerned. But what about when it impinges on others. What if she only wants to attend a school for trees? Or wants pruning on the NHS?" It would have to be a privet school. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't see what the issue is. It's only an option to change paperwork. My daughter is nearing 16, if she wants to identify as a tree, so be it. Yes, so be it as far as she's concerned. But what about when it impinges on others. What if she only wants to attend a school for trees? Or wants pruning on the NHS? It would have to be a privet school. " very good! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't see what the issue is. It's only an option to change paperwork. My daughter is nearing 16, if she wants to identify as a tree, so be it. Yes, so be it as far as she's concerned. But what about when it impinges on others. What if she only wants to attend a school for trees? Or wants pruning on the NHS? It would have to be a privet school. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't see what the issue is. It's only an option to change paperwork. My daughter is nearing 16, if she wants to identify as a tree, so be it. Yes, so be it as far as she's concerned. But what about when it impinges on others. What if she only wants to attend a school for trees? Or wants pruning on the NHS? It would have to be a privet school. " Kinda, we’re witches in the woods, anyone is welcome as long as they’re accepting | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"a guy could use all female facilities changing rooms toilets apply for a job as a female they can be sent to a female prison rather than male prison they can clean dishes they can do ironing and other things that women do but in all seriousness it has opened a can of worms through out the UK someone from England can pop over the border for 3 months, change sex then back to England or where ever " Someone who has changed gender or reassigned their gender which is the correct term as stated in the equality act can already do all that, this applies throughout the whole of the U.K. they don’t need to have a gender recognition certificate to do any of the things you’ve stated. And Scottish GRCs will only apply to people born in Scotland if you educated yourself and done your home work you’d know this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No but considering a rapist can legally change their gender using this law and then force their victim to use female (or male ) pro nouns during court proceedings is just ridiculous." They could always refer to their rapist as "the defendant", thus avoiding any gender switching problems. If that's your only objection, I have to say that you're not making a compelling case | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone identifies as a female whst is wrong with them using female facilities or toilets or applying for a job as their chosen gender? Or being sent to a female prison?" What is wrong? Erm, plenty. Males, typically, are bigger and stronger than females. They are also, again typically, more violent than females. Some women are uncomfortable having to share vulnerable spaces like changing rooms and toilets with men. Understandably. Men are now taking opportunities and achievements from women in sports. Men are now entering women’s prisons and r*ping/impregnating them. Call me old fashioned, but I see plenty wrong with a society that has started to protect the feelings of men over the actual, physical safety of women. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No but considering a rapist can legally change their gender using this law and then force their victim to use female (or male ) pro nouns during court proceedings is just ridiculous. But then with the SNP why would any be surprised " Has this happened? Or is this just a strawman argument? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does it matter at all what gender someone identifies as? absolutely, especially if your son or daughter at age 16 decide to change gender without serious consideration or thought" No one transitions without serious consideration or thought. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So! You want to be a girl Move to Scotland, dress as a girl for 3 - 6 months and you can legally change your gender if you are 16 or older. . In Scotland the parliament will not send a young person under the age of 25 to jail when they commit a crime because they say the brain is not fully developed until 25 years of age. And yet a child of age 16 can legally change their gender. Is this crazy or what? The new rules, which are expected to come into force sometime next year, will lower the minimum age that people can apply for a GRC from 18 to 16. They will also remove the requirement for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria. And applicants will now only need to have lived in their acquired gender for three months - or six months if they are aged 16 and 17 - rather than two years. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does it matter at all what gender someone identifies as? absolutely, especially if your son or daughter at age 16 decide to change gender without serious consideration or thought" In what world would someone decide to change their gender without going through a process of agonising consideration? Just because you can’t get your head around it, doesn’t mean the individual hasn’t thought it through. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So! You want to be a girl Move to Scotland, dress as a girl for 3 - 6 months and you can legally change your gender if you are 16 or older. . In Scotland the parliament will not send a young person under the age of 25 to jail when they commit a crime because they say the brain is not fully developed until 25 years of age. And yet a child of age 16 can legally change their gender. Is this crazy or what? The new rules, which are expected to come into force sometime next year, will lower the minimum age that people can apply for a GRC from 18 to 16. They will also remove the requirement for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria. And applicants will now only need to have lived in their acquired gender for three months - or six months if they are aged 16 and 17 - rather than two years. " Yes. Crazy. Totally fucking tonto. 2 genders. Cunt or balls. You are born one or the other. Wishing doesn't make it so, otherwise I'd be taller and younger. With a bigger cock. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is wrong? Erm, plenty. Males, typically, are bigger and stronger than females. They are also, again typically, more violent than females. Some women are uncomfortable having to share vulnerable spaces like changing rooms and toilets with men. Understandably. Men are now taking opportunities and achievements from women in sports. Men are now entering women’s prisons and r*ping/impregnating them. Call me old fashioned, but I see plenty wrong with a society that has started to protect the feelings of men over the actual, physical safety of women." Only case I can find of female prisoners being impregnated by trans inmates on a quick search is listed as consensual. I'm 6ft of natural woman and can hold my own, do I need to be separated from the daintier women for their own safety? What about small men? Because I'm physically stronger than most women do I not count as female any more? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's just a load of people who play pretend but demand others play pretend too. " That's a pretty horrible thing to say. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So! You want to be a girl Move to Scotland, dress as a girl for 3 - 6 months and you can legally change your gender if you are 16 or older. . In Scotland the parliament will not send a young person under the age of 25 to jail when they commit a crime because they say the brain is not fully developed until 25 years of age. And yet a child of age 16 can legally change their gender. Is this crazy or what? The new rules, which are expected to come into force sometime next year, will lower the minimum age that people can apply for a GRC from 18 to 16. They will also remove the requirement for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria. And applicants will now only need to have lived in their acquired gender for three months - or six months if they are aged 16 and 17 - rather than two years. Yes. Crazy. Totally fucking tonto. 2 genders. Cunt or balls. You are born one or the other. Wishing doesn't make it so, otherwise I'd be taller and younger. With a bigger cock." Gender and sex are different. You are referring to physical attributes, which is sex. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's just a load of people who play pretend but demand others play pretend too. You cannot change Gender, everyone knows that but people can pretend they can so let them be happy pretending but don't make laws that deny fact. " Gender is not a physical characteristic. Of course you can change gender. Just because you are happy with the gender you were born with, doesn't mean everyone is. What's wrong if someone can change their gender to better represent who they are, to lead a happier and better life? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So! You want to be a girl Move to Scotland, dress as a girl for 3 - 6 months and you can legally change your gender if you are 16 or older. . In Scotland the parliament will not send a young person under the age of 25 to jail when they commit a crime because they say the brain is not fully developed until 25 years of age. And yet a child of age 16 can legally change their gender. Is this crazy or what? The new rules, which are expected to come into force sometime next year, will lower the minimum age that people can apply for a GRC from 18 to 16. They will also remove the requirement for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria. And applicants will now only need to have lived in their acquired gender for three months - or six months if they are aged 16 and 17 - rather than two years. Yes. Crazy. Totally fucking tonto. 2 genders. Cunt or balls. You are born one or the other. Wishing doesn't make it so, otherwise I'd be taller and younger. With a bigger cock. Gender and sex are different. You are referring to physical attributes, which is sex." Disagree. Gender is physical. Sexual orientation is not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Disagree. Gender is physical. Sexual orientation is not." I am referring to biological sex, not sexual orientation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Disagree. Gender is physical. Sexual orientation is not. I am referring to biological sex, not sexual orientation." Biological sex IS gender. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Disagree. Gender is physical. Sexual orientation is not. I am referring to biological sex, not sexual orientation. Biological sex IS gender." Cambridge dictionary: Gender: "a group of people in a society who share particular qualities or ways of behaving which that society associates with being male, female, or another identity". Sex: "the physical state of being either male, female, or intersex" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" These reasons are why so many people struggle with the concept. It's so easy to throw around the words bigot and transphobe but all it does is shut down reasonable dialogue. " As evidenced by this thread, there’s no-one with any ‘struggle’ over the concept of gender fluidity with anything reasonable worth listening to, so shutting them down is fine. It’s the easiest thing in the world to be neither a bigot or a transphobe - but if you define yourself as ‘gender critical’, you are both. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Disagree. Gender is physical. Sexual orientation is not. I am referring to biological sex, not sexual orientation. Biological sex IS gender. Cambridge dictionary: Gender: "a group of people in a society who share particular qualities or ways of behaving which that society associates with being male, female, or another identity". Sex: "the physical state of being either male, female, or intersex" " Beg to differ. Just my opinion, obviously, but I believe different terminology is required. I think the term gender (previously a synonym for biological sex) has been subverted. Gender role might be a better term. You can be born male yet live the gender role of female. In fact, if you're going to simply choose, there should be a whole suite of new words to clarify the gender roles assumed by persons going forward. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's just a load of people who play pretend but demand others play pretend too. That's a pretty horrible thing to say. " There you go, it's nicer to play pretend you'd say but the majority won't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ugh....Just look at all the transphobes" Sticks & stones & made up words. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Really don’t care what you identify as… what I care about is the expectation that I am then obligated to validate your choice or If I don’t then I am some how bullying or phobic. " What do yiu mean by validate it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone identifies as a female whst is wrong with them using female facilities or toilets or applying for a job as their chosen gender? Or being sent to a female prison? What is wrong? Erm, plenty. Males, typically, are bigger and stronger than females. They are also, again typically, more violent than females. Some women are uncomfortable having to share vulnerable spaces like changing rooms and toilets with men. Understandably. Men are now taking opportunities and achievements from women in sports. Men are now entering women’s prisons and r*ping/impregnating them. Call me old fashioned, but I see plenty wrong with a society that has started to protect the feelings of men over the actual, physical safety of women." Can yiu tell me of any instance where a MtF transgender person has been sent to a femalevprison, r#ped another prisoner and made them pregnant? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Really don’t care what you identify as… what I care about is the expectation that I am then obligated to validate your choice or If I don’t then I am some how bullying or phobic. " I don't think it's asking that much that you treat someone with a bit of dignity. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone identifies as a female whst is wrong with them using female facilities or toilets or applying for a job as their chosen gender? Or being sent to a female prison? What is wrong? Erm, plenty. Males, typically, are bigger and stronger than females. They are also, again typically, more violent than females. Some women are uncomfortable having to share vulnerable spaces like changing rooms and toilets with men. Understandably. Men are now taking opportunities and achievements from women in sports. Men are now entering women’s prisons and r*ping/impregnating them. Call me old fashioned, but I see plenty wrong with a society that has started to protect the feelings of men over the actual, physical safety of women. Can yiu tell me of any instance where a MtF transgender person has been sent to a femalevprison, r#ped another prisoner and made them pregnant?" ffs Look for your own facts, or switch onto GB news right now as they are in full debate regarding this. Channel 236. How would you feel if 3 or 4 adult sex pests changed over and went into the same changing room as your teenage daughter? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone identifies as a female whst is wrong with them using female facilities or toilets or applying for a job as their chosen gender? Or being sent to a female prison? What is wrong? Erm, plenty. Males, typically, are bigger and stronger than females. They are also, again typically, more violent than females. Some women are uncomfortable having to share vulnerable spaces like changing rooms and toilets with men. Understandably. Men are now taking opportunities and achievements from women in sports. Men are now entering women’s prisons and r*ping/impregnating them. Call me old fashioned, but I see plenty wrong with a society that has started to protect the feelings of men over the actual, physical safety of women. Can yiu tell me of any instance where a MtF transgender person has been sent to a femalevprison, r#ped another prisoner and made them pregnant? ffs Look for your own facts, or switch onto GB news right now as they are in full debate regarding this. Channel 236. How would you feel if 3 or 4 adult sex pests changed over and went into the same changing room as your teenage daughter?" So soneone states something as fact and when asked to prove it I have to look for my own facts... okay Again do you have any evidence that men claim to be trans just to access changing rooms? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't see what the issue is. It's only an option to change paperwork. My daughter is nearing 16, if she wants to identify as a tree, so be it. Yes, so be it as far as she's concerned. But what about when it impinges on others. What if she only wants to attend a school for trees? Or wants pruning on the NHS?" That will be her decision to make, not yours or anyone else's. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" So soneone states something as fact and when asked to prove it I have to look for my own facts... okay Again do you have any evidence that men claim to be trans just to access changing rooms? " He read it in The S*n or Daily Mail or watched it on Gammon Bigot News channel 236 obvs? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I had a pound for every gender their is ....I'd have 2 pound" Haha exactly!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't care what people wish to identify as, I won't recognise it anyway!!" Why not? So say a relative of yours or a neighbour was transgender, why wouldn't you recognise it? What would yiu gain by not recognising it and how would that compare to the impact your actions may have on them? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Disagree. Gender is physical. Sexual orientation is not. I am referring to biological sex, not sexual orientation. Biological sex IS gender." No it's not, gender is socially constructed, sex is biological. The two words refer to different aspects. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So! You want to be a girl Move to Scotland, dress as a girl for 3 - 6 months and you can legally change your gender if you are 16 or older. . In Scotland the parliament will not send a young person under the age of 25 to jail when they commit a crime because they say the brain is not fully developed until 25 years of age. And yet a child of age 16 can legally change their gender. Is this crazy or what? The new rules, which are expected to come into force sometime next year, will lower the minimum age that people can apply for a GRC from 18 to 16. They will also remove the requirement for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria. And applicants will now only need to have lived in their acquired gender for three months - or six months if they are aged 16 and 17 - rather than two years. Yes. Crazy. Totally fucking tonto. 2 genders. Cunt or balls. You are born one or the other. Wishing doesn't make it so, otherwise I'd be taller and younger. With a bigger cock." Posts like this show such a poor grasp of some simple basics, that the whole discussion is merely an exercise in futility. This is a great step by Scotland | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Really don’t care what you identify as… what I care about is the expectation that I am then obligated to validate your choice or If I don’t then I am some how bullying or phobic. " I mean, we do with most things. If someone says their name is Paul, you tend not to insist that they look like a Mark and call them Mark. Even if they changed their name to Paul, from Mark. The person who keeps calling Paul, Mark, is a douchebag. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone identifies as a female whst is wrong with them using female facilities or toilets or applying for a job as their chosen gender? Or being sent to a female prison? What is wrong? Erm, plenty. Males, typically, are bigger and stronger than females. They are also, again typically, more violent than females. Some women are uncomfortable having to share vulnerable spaces like changing rooms and toilets with men. Understandably. Men are now taking opportunities and achievements from women in sports. Men are now entering women’s prisons and r*ping/impregnating them. Call me old fashioned, but I see plenty wrong with a society that has started to protect the feelings of men over the actual, physical safety of women. Can yiu tell me of any instance where a MtF transgender person has been sent to a femalevprison, r#ped another prisoner and made them pregnant? ffs Look for your own facts, or switch onto GB news right now as they are in full debate regarding this. Channel 236. How would you feel if 3 or 4 adult sex pests changed over and went into the same changing room as your teenage daughter?" I label this as "yet more shit that never actually happens". If you want to find actual adult sex pests, then go look at the gender called "men". Because every "concern" you have is about men. Manly men. Not about individuals who have gone through an arduous process to get themselves on a handy registration list of people who have thought very deeply about their gender and put themselves at great risk of persecution and assault from fuckwits filled with hate. At least use some slight amount of intelligence! What kind of dumb shit wannabe sex pest would actually spend anything from six months (Scottish proposal) to five years (English current actual) of working through a humiliating legal process - which involves amongst other things telling all your family, your employer, your neighbours, your bank, your friends, that you are transgender - in order to walk into a ladies toilet? When all that any man actually needs is a "cleaner" badge and a bucket and mop? If you want to find real perverts that perform gender attacks, m0lestation, persecution, verbal and physical assault, incitement to violence, and all round nasty bastard stuff - it's pretty well anyone that labels themselves as "gender critical". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yeah, the SNP, home of famous women's rights champion Alec Salmond. " Alex Salmond is very much persona non grata with the SNP these days, defo not his home. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't care what people wish to identify as, I won't recognise it anyway!!" That's not very nice. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ugh....Just look at all the transphobes" My thoughts exactly. I’m not au fait with every aspect of fab rules but I’d really hoped such rampant bigotry would be against them. Sending hugs to any trans people reading this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why has there been no discussion here about women who want to identify as men? It must, surely, be both ways around? " It is. Trans men absolutely exist. It rarely comes up in the culture wars though. Except when discussing cervical and pregnancy care. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"ive not read anything thru yet but im all for queer right's ands trans rights 2 of my kid identify as fluid .. but ive just seen on the shy news that Westminster are going to challenge it and null the new law ... before you condem the used of the word queer do your home work first" So as Fluid would you be happy if needed for them to go in to a male prison. As far as I know at the moment the prison service is still men and women so one or the other. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"ive not read anything thru yet but im all for queer right's ands trans rights 2 of my kid identify as fluid .. but ive just seen on the shy news that Westminster are going to challenge it and null the new law ... before you condem the used of the word queer do your home work first So as Fluid would you be happy if needed for them to go in to a male prison. As far as I know at the moment the prison service is still men and women so one or the other." as ive said ive not read what has been done in scotland as yet | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I had a pound for every gender their is ....I'd have 2 pound" It's not a simple as that, or are you a knob ?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most social issues just distract people from what they should be actually concerned about. Imagine if people put the same energy until scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government..." *Into | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most social issues just distract people from what they should be actually concerned about. Imagine if people put the same energy until scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government..." So we shouldn't be concerned about ensuring that a minority group are safe and protected under the law? No ta. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most social issues just distract people from what they should be actually concerned about. Imagine if people put the same energy until scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government... So we shouldn't be concerned about ensuring that a minority group are safe and protected under the law? No ta." We do it's called the Equality Act. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't care what people wish to identify as, I won't recognise it anyway!!" Just........durrrrrrr | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a bit of paper that could mean the world to someone and changes practically nothing for anyone else. Gender neutral bathrooms are becoming more and more normal these days, changing rooms have cubicles etc etc. My 10 year old has zero issue with understanding and respecting pronouns because it's all very normal to her generation. Biological sex is a different thing from gender - that we just made up and attached lots of boy/girl names, traits, jobs, which loo we can use. If someone doesn't want to be in the box society has put them in, why shouldn't they have freedom to choose? I only know a couple of transgender girls, so they're my main frame of reference and my heart breaks for them when all the talk is of very extreme possibilities for how someone could abuse the laws, when they're the sweetest girls who wouldn't say boo to a goose and just want to go about their lives in peace." Thank you, you so get it, and your 10 year old will be just fine....... So many dinosaurs, even in this community.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most social issues just distract people from what they should be actually concerned about. Imagine if people put the same energy until scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government... So we shouldn't be concerned about ensuring that a minority group are safe and protected under the law? No ta. We do it's called the Equality Act." So you think the many questions are solved? That nothing further needs to be discussed? That's... ummm... naive? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I had a pound for every gender their is ....I'd have 2 pound" This made me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a bit of paper that could mean the world to someone and changes practically nothing for anyone else. Gender neutral bathrooms are becoming more and more normal these days, changing rooms have cubicles etc etc. My 10 year old has zero issue with understanding and respecting pronouns because it's all very normal to her generation. Biological sex is a different thing from gender - that we just made up and attached lots of boy/girl names, traits, jobs, which loo we can use. If someone doesn't want to be in the box society has put them in, why shouldn't they have freedom to choose? I only know a couple of transgender girls, so they're my main frame of reference and my heart breaks for them when all the talk is of very extreme possibilities for how someone could abuse the laws, when they're the sweetest girls who wouldn't say boo to a goose and just want to go about their lives in peace." So should we have gender neutral hospital wards? Might save money. And gender neutral prisons including sex afenders in the same wings and same prison. Might reduce crime. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most social issues just distract people from what they should be actually concerned about. Imagine if people put the same energy until scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government... So we shouldn't be concerned about ensuring that a minority group are safe and protected under the law? No ta. We do it's called the Equality Act. So you think the many questions are solved? That nothing further needs to be discussed? That's... ummm... naive?" Of course not. But scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government would benefit *everyone*. Including those in minority groups. Imagine if the money that was pissed away on an ineffective track and trace app, HS2 and smart motorways (and more) was spent improving deprived areas, giving disadvantaged minorities more opportunities and services and perhaps even improving the services for trans people on the NHS? But no, rather than uniting under one banner to improve the way government is run we waste our time worrying about what bathrooms people can use. People in the top 1% must be absolutely creasing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most social issues just distract people from what they should be actually concerned about. Imagine if people put the same energy until scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government... So we shouldn't be concerned about ensuring that a minority group are safe and protected under the law? No ta. We do it's called the Equality Act. So you think the many questions are solved? That nothing further needs to be discussed? That's... ummm... naive? Of course not. But scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government would benefit *everyone*. Including those in minority groups. Imagine if the money that was pissed away on an ineffective track and trace app, HS2 and smart motorways (and more) was spent improving deprived areas, giving disadvantaged minorities more opportunities and services and perhaps even improving the services for trans people on the NHS? But no, rather than uniting under one banner to improve the way government is run we waste our time worrying about what bathrooms people can use. People in the top 1% must be absolutely creasing." Wouldn't spending money in deprived areas involve scrutiny of social issues? Which is what you claim to be against? How else would you decide how to effectively allocate funds? Personally, apart from being entirely against bigotry, I'm aware of the use of minority groups to facilitate the rise of authoritarianism and fascism (well documented in the literature) - it's likely that abandoning social issues like these would have knock on effects. If you don't want to talk about social issues, though, then it's a free country, do as you please. Any banner that doesn't prioritise the wellbeing of trans people, though, I might have to use as bog roll before I set it on fire | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a bit of paper that could mean the world to someone and changes practically nothing for anyone else. Gender neutral bathrooms are becoming more and more normal these days, changing rooms have cubicles etc etc. My 10 year old has zero issue with understanding and respecting pronouns because it's all very normal to her generation. Biological sex is a different thing from gender - that we just made up and attached lots of boy/girl names, traits, jobs, which loo we can use. If someone doesn't want to be in the box society has put them in, why shouldn't they have freedom to choose? I only know a couple of transgender girls, so they're my main frame of reference and my heart breaks for them when all the talk is of very extreme possibilities for how someone could abuse the laws, when they're the sweetest girls who wouldn't say boo to a goose and just want to go about their lives in peace. So should we have gender neutral hospital wards? Might save money. And gender neutral prisons including sex afenders in the same wings and same prison. Might reduce crime. " Why not hospital wards? Prisons I can see an issue and that needs worked out. Overturning our perceptions of gender and how society is structured around it is gonna take some work. Do we just not do things because they're a bit of effort? How do we ever progress then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a bit of paper that could mean the world to someone and changes practically nothing for anyone else. Gender neutral bathrooms are becoming more and more normal these days, changing rooms have cubicles etc etc. My 10 year old has zero issue with understanding and respecting pronouns because it's all very normal to her generation. Biological sex is a different thing from gender - that we just made up and attached lots of boy/girl names, traits, jobs, which loo we can use. If someone doesn't want to be in the box society has put them in, why shouldn't they have freedom to choose? I only know a couple of transgender girls, so they're my main frame of reference and my heart breaks for them when all the talk is of very extreme possibilities for how someone could abuse the laws, when they're the sweetest girls who wouldn't say boo to a goose and just want to go about their lives in peace. So should we have gender neutral hospital wards? Might save money. And gender neutral prisons including sex afenders in the same wings and same prison. Might reduce crime. Why not hospital wards? Prisons I can see an issue and that needs worked out. Overturning our perceptions of gender and how society is structured around it is gonna take some work. Do we just not do things because they're a bit of effort? How do we ever progress then? " I've been in mixed hospital wards (in Australia). It's not even remotely a big deal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most social issues just distract people from what they should be actually concerned about. Imagine if people put the same energy until scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government... So we shouldn't be concerned about ensuring that a minority group are safe and protected under the law? No ta. We do it's called the Equality Act. So you think the many questions are solved? That nothing further needs to be discussed? That's... ummm... naive? Of course not. But scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government would benefit *everyone*. Including those in minority groups. Imagine if the money that was pissed away on an ineffective track and trace app, HS2 and smart motorways (and more) was spent improving deprived areas, giving disadvantaged minorities more opportunities and services and perhaps even improving the services for trans people on the NHS? But no, rather than uniting under one banner to improve the way government is run we waste our time worrying about what bathrooms people can use. People in the top 1% must be absolutely creasing. Wouldn't spending money in deprived areas involve scrutiny of social issues? Which is what you claim to be against? How else would you decide how to effectively allocate funds? Personally, apart from being entirely against bigotry, I'm aware of the use of minority groups to facilitate the rise of authoritarianism and fascism (well documented in the literature) - it's likely that abandoning social issues like these would have knock on effects. If you don't want to talk about social issues, though, then it's a free country, do as you please. Any banner that doesn't prioritise the wellbeing of trans people, though, I might have to use as bog roll before I set it on fire " So you say "Prioritise the wellbeing of trans people" as if its more important than any other minority group should we not all be treated equally. Or is that to ideal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a bit of paper that could mean the world to someone and changes practically nothing for anyone else. Gender neutral bathrooms are becoming more and more normal these days, changing rooms have cubicles etc etc. My 10 year old has zero issue with understanding and respecting pronouns because it's all very normal to her generation. Biological sex is a different thing from gender - that we just made up and attached lots of boy/girl names, traits, jobs, which loo we can use. If someone doesn't want to be in the box society has put them in, why shouldn't they have freedom to choose? I only know a couple of transgender girls, so they're my main frame of reference and my heart breaks for them when all the talk is of very extreme possibilities for how someone could abuse the laws, when they're the sweetest girls who wouldn't say boo to a goose and just want to go about their lives in peace. So should we have gender neutral hospital wards? Might save money. And gender neutral prisons including sex afenders in the same wings and same prison. Might reduce crime. Why not hospital wards? Prisons I can see an issue and that needs worked out. Overturning our perceptions of gender and how society is structured around it is gonna take some work. Do we just not do things because they're a bit of effort? How do we ever progress then? I've been in mixed hospital wards (in Australia). It's not even remotely a big deal." What the ward or the unit generally the unit is made up of wards male female the unit is say ENT so you would be OK in a ward on a hot day if all 6/8 had very little on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most social issues just distract people from what they should be actually concerned about. Imagine if people put the same energy until scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government... So we shouldn't be concerned about ensuring that a minority group are safe and protected under the law? No ta. We do it's called the Equality Act. So you think the many questions are solved? That nothing further needs to be discussed? That's... ummm... naive? Of course not. But scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government would benefit *everyone*. Including those in minority groups. Imagine if the money that was pissed away on an ineffective track and trace app, HS2 and smart motorways (and more) was spent improving deprived areas, giving disadvantaged minorities more opportunities and services and perhaps even improving the services for trans people on the NHS? But no, rather than uniting under one banner to improve the way government is run we waste our time worrying about what bathrooms people can use. People in the top 1% must be absolutely creasing. Wouldn't spending money in deprived areas involve scrutiny of social issues? Which is what you claim to be against? How else would you decide how to effectively allocate funds? Personally, apart from being entirely against bigotry, I'm aware of the use of minority groups to facilitate the rise of authoritarianism and fascism (well documented in the literature) - it's likely that abandoning social issues like these would have knock on effects. If you don't want to talk about social issues, though, then it's a free country, do as you please. Any banner that doesn't prioritise the wellbeing of trans people, though, I might have to use as bog roll before I set it on fire " Don't recall saying I was 'against' social issues and was more making the point that the time and energy would be better spent elsewhere whereby a side-effect would be the improvement of social issues (I.e. scrutinising public spending). Somehow I think if the government didn't waste so much money, stopped giving their mates ludicrous contracts and put more money into everyone's pockets and public services then social issues would naturally improve. Tit-bit legislation like this doesn't cost anything. Which is why governments are quite happy to let us fight among ourselves about it and then legislate once it gets to the point it would attract votes. Same team as you, different philosophy on solving the problem. That's all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a bit of paper that could mean the world to someone and changes practically nothing for anyone else. Gender neutral bathrooms are becoming more and more normal these days, changing rooms have cubicles etc etc. My 10 year old has zero issue with understanding and respecting pronouns because it's all very normal to her generation. Biological sex is a different thing from gender - that we just made up and attached lots of boy/girl names, traits, jobs, which loo we can use. If someone doesn't want to be in the box society has put them in, why shouldn't they have freedom to choose? I only know a couple of transgender girls, so they're my main frame of reference and my heart breaks for them when all the talk is of very extreme possibilities for how someone could abuse the laws, when they're the sweetest girls who wouldn't say boo to a goose and just want to go about their lives in peace. So should we have gender neutral hospital wards? Might save money. And gender neutral prisons including sex afenders in the same wings and same prison. Might reduce crime. Why not hospital wards? Prisons I can see an issue and that needs worked out. Overturning our perceptions of gender and how society is structured around it is gonna take some work. Do we just not do things because they're a bit of effort? How do we ever progress then? I've been in mixed hospital wards (in Australia). It's not even remotely a big deal." I can't see an issue either. In fact, I think there'd prob be better care. My sister works in a hospital and sometimes they'll have a packed mens ward and few women, or vice versa, and the staffing can be quite disproportionate. It's a good example though of a knee-jerk 'no this is the way it has to be' reaction that when you actually think about, doesn't NEED to be at all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most social issues just distract people from what they should be actually concerned about. Imagine if people put the same energy until scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government... So we shouldn't be concerned about ensuring that a minority group are safe and protected under the law? No ta. We do it's called the Equality Act. So you think the many questions are solved? That nothing further needs to be discussed? That's... ummm... naive? Of course not. But scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government would benefit *everyone*. Including those in minority groups. Imagine if the money that was pissed away on an ineffective track and trace app, HS2 and smart motorways (and more) was spent improving deprived areas, giving disadvantaged minorities more opportunities and services and perhaps even improving the services for trans people on the NHS? But no, rather than uniting under one banner to improve the way government is run we waste our time worrying about what bathrooms people can use. People in the top 1% must be absolutely creasing. Wouldn't spending money in deprived areas involve scrutiny of social issues? Which is what you claim to be against? How else would you decide how to effectively allocate funds? Personally, apart from being entirely against bigotry, I'm aware of the use of minority groups to facilitate the rise of authoritarianism and fascism (well documented in the literature) - it's likely that abandoning social issues like these would have knock on effects. If you don't want to talk about social issues, though, then it's a free country, do as you please. Any banner that doesn't prioritise the wellbeing of trans people, though, I might have to use as bog roll before I set it on fire So you say "Prioritise the wellbeing of trans people" as if its more important than any other minority group should we not all be treated equally. Or is that to ideal." I didn't say to the exclusion of others. Equally or equity might be a nice idea. We won't get there if the fascist rhetoric around trans people continues, though. Indeed it's corrosive to other areas of progress. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't see what the issue is. It's only an option to change paperwork. My daughter is nearing 16, if she wants to identify as a tree, so be it. Yes, so be it as far as she's concerned. But what about when it impinges on others. What if she only wants to attend a school for trees? Or wants pruning on the NHS? It would have to be a privet school. " Just hedging their bets | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most social issues just distract people from what they should be actually concerned about. Imagine if people put the same energy until scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government... So we shouldn't be concerned about ensuring that a minority group are safe and protected under the law? No ta. We do it's called the Equality Act. So you think the many questions are solved? That nothing further needs to be discussed? That's... ummm... naive? Of course not. But scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government would benefit *everyone*. Including those in minority groups. Imagine if the money that was pissed away on an ineffective track and trace app, HS2 and smart motorways (and more) was spent improving deprived areas, giving disadvantaged minorities more opportunities and services and perhaps even improving the services for trans people on the NHS? But no, rather than uniting under one banner to improve the way government is run we waste our time worrying about what bathrooms people can use. People in the top 1% must be absolutely creasing. Wouldn't spending money in deprived areas involve scrutiny of social issues? Which is what you claim to be against? How else would you decide how to effectively allocate funds? Personally, apart from being entirely against bigotry, I'm aware of the use of minority groups to facilitate the rise of authoritarianism and fascism (well documented in the literature) - it's likely that abandoning social issues like these would have knock on effects. If you don't want to talk about social issues, though, then it's a free country, do as you please. Any banner that doesn't prioritise the wellbeing of trans people, though, I might have to use as bog roll before I set it on fire Don't recall saying I was 'against' social issues and was more making the point that the time and energy would be better spent elsewhere whereby a side-effect would be the improvement of social issues (I.e. scrutinising public spending). Somehow I think if the government didn't waste so much money, stopped giving their mates ludicrous contracts and put more money into everyone's pockets and public services then social issues would naturally improve. Tit-bit legislation like this doesn't cost anything. Which is why governments are quite happy to let us fight among ourselves about it and then legislate once it gets to the point it would attract votes. Same team as you, different philosophy on solving the problem. That's all." I'm inclined to think there's a powerful movement in the offing using trans people (and others) as scapegoats to push authoritarianism. Lots of literature on the subject. I can also walk and chew gum - my musings on Fab are not my only thoughts on politics and what should be done in that vein. (On Fab, I think discussing the social issues is more pertinent) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"ive not read anything thru yet but im all for queer right's ands trans rights 2 of my kid identify as fluid .. but ive just seen on the shy news that Westminster are going to challenge it and null the new law ... before you condem the used of the word queer do your home work first So as Fluid would you be happy if needed for them to go in to a male prison. As far as I know at the moment the prison service is still men and women so one or the other." The prison system in the UK already has in place, and did so previous to there being any transgender prisoners, rules such that an individual should be assessed and placed within either the male or the female estate according to more than just simple gender. It is quite possible for a female violent offender to be deemed too dangerous to be housed with other women, and be held in a male prison. It is also possible for a feminine looking male who does not have a gender recognition certificate to be placed in the female estate if it is judged that this would be the only way their safety could be assured. In the vast majority of cases, it is the transgender prisoner who is attacked by males or females, rather than the other way around. I personally know a transwoman who served time within a male prison, years ago before gender recognition was considered. She was basically used as a sex plaything by stronger male prisoners, and was r@ped several hundred times over five years. She only survived because she did not make any report to the prison guards, attempting to accuse her attackers would only have gotten her killed. This is the reality of what can happen to transwomen if put in male prisons. [For the benefit of all those who will now say "she committed a crime, she deserved everything" - she admits she committed a crime, she agrees the length of sentence was fair for the crime. However someone who looks female should not have been just dumped among violent male offenders. As she told me though - "the first couple of dozen times are the worst, after that you just have to try to survive". ] | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"ive not read anything thru yet but im all for queer right's ands trans rights 2 of my kid identify as fluid .. but ive just seen on the shy news that Westminster are going to challenge it and null the new law ... before you condem the used of the word queer do your home work first So as Fluid would you be happy if needed for them to go in to a male prison. As far as I know at the moment the prison service is still men and women so one or the other. The prison system in the UK already has in place, and did so previous to there being any transgender prisoners, rules such that an individual should be assessed and placed within either the male or the female estate according to more than just simple gender. It is quite possible for a female violent offender to be deemed too dangerous to be housed with other women, and be held in a male prison. It is also possible for a feminine looking male who does not have a gender recognition certificate to be placed in the female estate if it is judged that this would be the only way their safety could be assured. In the vast majority of cases, it is the transgender prisoner who is attacked by males or females, rather than the other way around. I personally know a transwoman who served time within a male prison, years ago before gender recognition was considered. She was basically used as a sex plaything by stronger male prisoners, and was r@ped several hundred times over five years. She only survived because she did not make any report to the prison guards, attempting to accuse her attackers would only have gotten her killed. This is the reality of what can happen to transwomen if put in male prisons. [For the benefit of all those who will now say "she committed a crime, she deserved everything" - she admits she committed a crime, she agrees the length of sentence was fair for the crime. However someone who looks female should not have been just dumped among violent male offenders. As she told me though - "the first couple of dozen times are the worst, after that you just have to try to survive". ]" Thats terrible. No one should have to go through that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most social issues just distract people from what they should be actually concerned about. Imagine if people put the same energy until scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government... So we shouldn't be concerned about ensuring that a minority group are safe and protected under the law? No ta. We do it's called the Equality Act. So you think the many questions are solved? That nothing further needs to be discussed? That's... ummm... naive? Of course not. But scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government would benefit *everyone*. Including those in minority groups. Imagine if the money that was pissed away on an ineffective track and trace app, HS2 and smart motorways (and more) was spent improving deprived areas, giving disadvantaged minorities more opportunities and services and perhaps even improving the services for trans people on the NHS? But no, rather than uniting under one banner to improve the way government is run we waste our time worrying about what bathrooms people can use. People in the top 1% must be absolutely creasing. Wouldn't spending money in deprived areas involve scrutiny of social issues? Which is what you claim to be against? How else would you decide how to effectively allocate funds? Personally, apart from being entirely against bigotry, I'm aware of the use of minority groups to facilitate the rise of authoritarianism and fascism (well documented in the literature) - it's likely that abandoning social issues like these would have knock on effects. If you don't want to talk about social issues, though, then it's a free country, do as you please. Any banner that doesn't prioritise the wellbeing of trans people, though, I might have to use as bog roll before I set it on fire Don't recall saying I was 'against' social issues and was more making the point that the time and energy would be better spent elsewhere whereby a side-effect would be the improvement of social issues (I.e. scrutinising public spending). Somehow I think if the government didn't waste so much money, stopped giving their mates ludicrous contracts and put more money into everyone's pockets and public services then social issues would naturally improve. Tit-bit legislation like this doesn't cost anything. Which is why governments are quite happy to let us fight among ourselves about it and then legislate once it gets to the point it would attract votes. Same team as you, different philosophy on solving the problem. That's all. I'm inclined to think there's a powerful movement in the offing using trans people (and others) as scapegoats to push authoritarianism. Lots of literature on the subject. I can also walk and chew gum - my musings on Fab are not my only thoughts on politics and what should be done in that vein. (On Fab, I think discussing the social issues is more pertinent)" Which is precisely why I feel government scrutiny is a higher priority... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" In the vast majority of cases, it is the transgender prisoner who is attacked by males or females, rather than the other way around. " This is the thing that's always obscured in these discussions. That trans people are overwhelmingly the victims rather than the perpetrators of crime. So let's shit on them more? Ffs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most social issues just distract people from what they should be actually concerned about. Imagine if people put the same energy until scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government... So we shouldn't be concerned about ensuring that a minority group are safe and protected under the law? No ta. We do it's called the Equality Act. So you think the many questions are solved? That nothing further needs to be discussed? That's... ummm... naive? Of course not. But scrutinising public spending and conflicts of interest in government would benefit *everyone*. Including those in minority groups. Imagine if the money that was pissed away on an ineffective track and trace app, HS2 and smart motorways (and more) was spent improving deprived areas, giving disadvantaged minorities more opportunities and services and perhaps even improving the services for trans people on the NHS? But no, rather than uniting under one banner to improve the way government is run we waste our time worrying about what bathrooms people can use. People in the top 1% must be absolutely creasing. Wouldn't spending money in deprived areas involve scrutiny of social issues? Which is what you claim to be against? How else would you decide how to effectively allocate funds? Personally, apart from being entirely against bigotry, I'm aware of the use of minority groups to facilitate the rise of authoritarianism and fascism (well documented in the literature) - it's likely that abandoning social issues like these would have knock on effects. If you don't want to talk about social issues, though, then it's a free country, do as you please. Any banner that doesn't prioritise the wellbeing of trans people, though, I might have to use as bog roll before I set it on fire Don't recall saying I was 'against' social issues and was more making the point that the time and energy would be better spent elsewhere whereby a side-effect would be the improvement of social issues (I.e. scrutinising public spending). Somehow I think if the government didn't waste so much money, stopped giving their mates ludicrous contracts and put more money into everyone's pockets and public services then social issues would naturally improve. Tit-bit legislation like this doesn't cost anything. Which is why governments are quite happy to let us fight among ourselves about it and then legislate once it gets to the point it would attract votes. Same team as you, different philosophy on solving the problem. That's all. I'm inclined to think there's a powerful movement in the offing using trans people (and others) as scapegoats to push authoritarianism. Lots of literature on the subject. I can also walk and chew gum - my musings on Fab are not my only thoughts on politics and what should be done in that vein. (On Fab, I think discussing the social issues is more pertinent) Which is precisely why I feel government scrutiny is a higher priority..." You're most welcome to have those conversations on the forum if you like. On this thread about trans people, I'll discuss trans people. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"ive not read anything thru yet but im all for queer right's ands trans rights 2 of my kid identify as fluid .. but ive just seen on the shy news that Westminster are going to challenge it and null the new law ... before you condem the used of the word queer do your home work first So as Fluid would you be happy if needed for them to go in to a male prison. As far as I know at the moment the prison service is still men and women so one or the other. The prison system in the UK already has in place, and did so previous to there being any transgender prisoners, rules such that an individual should be assessed and placed within either the male or the female estate according to more than just simple gender. It is quite possible for a female violent offender to be deemed too dangerous to be housed with other women, and be held in a male prison. It is also possible for a feminine looking male who does not have a gender recognition certificate to be placed in the female estate if it is judged that this would be the only way their safety could be assured. In the vast majority of cases, it is the transgender prisoner who is attacked by males or females, rather than the other way around. I personally know a transwoman who served time within a male prison, years ago before gender recognition was considered. She was basically used as a sex plaything by stronger male prisoners, and was r@ped several hundred times over five years. She only survived because she did not make any report to the prison guards, attempting to accuse her attackers would only have gotten her killed. This is the reality of what can happen to transwomen if put in male prisons. [For the benefit of all those who will now say "she committed a crime, she deserved everything" - she admits she committed a crime, she agrees the length of sentence was fair for the crime. However someone who looks female should not have been just dumped among violent male offenders. As she told me though - "the first couple of dozen times are the worst, after that you just have to try to survive". ] Thats terrible. No one should have to go through that " Sorry about you friend the wife worked on a mental health wing so see this sort of thing as a nurse. And is quiting in the new year as the trans population in custody is such a problem. And in a male prison she has to call them Mr Or Miss. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"ive not read anything thru yet but im all for queer right's ands trans rights 2 of my kid identify as fluid .. but ive just seen on the shy news that Westminster are going to challenge it and null the new law ... before you condem the used of the word queer do your home work first So as Fluid would you be happy if needed for them to go in to a male prison. As far as I know at the moment the prison service is still men and women so one or the other. The prison system in the UK already has in place, and did so previous to there being any transgender prisoners, rules such that an individual should be assessed and placed within either the male or the female estate according to more than just simple gender. It is quite possible for a female violent offender to be deemed too dangerous to be housed with other women, and be held in a male prison. It is also possible for a feminine looking male who does not have a gender recognition certificate to be placed in the female estate if it is judged that this would be the only way their safety could be assured. In the vast majority of cases, it is the transgender prisoner who is attacked by males or females, rather than the other way around. I personally know a transwoman who served time within a male prison, years ago before gender recognition was considered. She was basically used as a sex plaything by stronger male prisoners, and was r@ped several hundred times over five years. She only survived because she did not make any report to the prison guards, attempting to accuse her attackers would only have gotten her killed. This is the reality of what can happen to transwomen if put in male prisons. [For the benefit of all those who will now say "she committed a crime, she deserved everything" - she admits she committed a crime, she agrees the length of sentence was fair for the crime. However someone who looks female should not have been just dumped among violent male offenders. As she told me though - "the first couple of dozen times are the worst, after that you just have to try to survive". ] Thats terrible. No one should have to go through that " But if your a 6' 6' strong female you could also end up in a male prison. Or you might decide to Trans in custody, in the hope of moving to a female prison yes it has happened ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You're most welcome to have those conversations on the forum if you like. On this thread about trans people, I'll discuss trans people. " Interesting, I thought this thread was about a piece of legislation. Forgive me for thinking that has anything to do with the way in which the government operates as a means of collecting votes rather than spending money wisely... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You're most welcome to have those conversations on the forum if you like. On this thread about trans people, I'll discuss trans people. Interesting, I thought this thread was about a piece of legislation. Forgive me for thinking that has anything to do with the way in which the government operates as a means of collecting votes rather than spending money wisely..." We've obviously read very different threads. Our views are irreconcilable and I'll spend no further time derailing the thread with this tangent | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You're most welcome to have those conversations on the forum if you like. On this thread about trans people, I'll discuss trans people. Interesting, I thought this thread was about a piece of legislation. Forgive me for thinking that has anything to do with the way in which the government operates as a means of collecting votes rather than spending money wisely... We've obviously read very different threads. Our views are irreconcilable and I'll spend no further time derailing the thread with this tangent " A deflection Emi Martinez would be proud of. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does it matter at all what gender someone identifies as? absolutely, especially if your son or daughter at age 16 decide to change gender without serious consideration or thought" If my son or daughter decided to change gender at 16 I'd be asking questions, ensuring they were making the right decision for them, that they fully understood the short and long term implications. I'd listen to their views and thought processes. Once I'd understood them, they'd get my 100% support, my love for them as my children would be unwavering. This decision is about them, not me. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't care what people wish to identify as, I won't recognise it anyway!!" It's a fair point. People have an equal right to reject or accept changes to society norms. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Instead of getting yourself het up about something based on a list of things that 'could' (but haven't) happened, why not get on with doing something you enjoy and leave others to live their lives as they wish?" We are not a mean society and no one cares if you wish to live you life pretending to be a different gender, above everything this is about women. Only born women can take that identification but the trans community are demanding to adopt it. This will never be acceptable to the majority of society, never. So the trans community need to be realistic in taking a different identification. A dog can't be a horse even if it's eats hay. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Instead of getting yourself het up about something based on a list of things that 'could' (but haven't) happened, why not get on with doing something you enjoy and leave others to live their lives as they wish? We are not a mean society and no one cares if you wish to live you life pretending to be a different gender, above everything this is about women. Only born women can take that identification but the trans community are demanding to adopt it. This will never be acceptable to the majority of society, never. So the trans community need to be realistic in taking a different identification. A dog can't be a horse even if it's eats hay." Imagine if as a society, we had taken that stance with race | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whoever thinks sex pests aren't just going to do what they want, any differently to whether this good new law exists, most probably has shit for brains. Pests will pester and offend, as they can today. " Fair point Sophie. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't care what people wish to identify as, I won't recognise it anyway!! It's a fair point. People have an equal right to reject or accept changes to society norms." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Instead of getting yourself het up about something based on a list of things that 'could' (but haven't) happened, why not get on with doing something you enjoy and leave others to live their lives as they wish? We are not a mean society and no one cares if you wish to live you life pretending to be a different gender, above everything this is about women. Only born women can take that identification but the trans community are demanding to adopt it. This will never be acceptable to the majority of society, never. So the trans community need to be realistic in taking a different identification. A dog can't be a horse even if it's eats hay. Imagine if as a society, we had taken that stance with race " It's not the same comparison though. A black person is a black person because of their physical and observable genetics. They don't have to change any aspect of themselves, they just are. A trans woman can have treatment and surgery to appear and feel like a woman but will never be able to physically transform into a fully functioning biological woman. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Instead of getting yourself het up about something based on a list of things that 'could' (but haven't) happened, why not get on with doing something you enjoy and leave others to live their lives as they wish? We are not a mean society and no one cares if you wish to live you life pretending to be a different gender, above everything this is about women. Only born women can take that identification but the trans community are demanding to adopt it. This will never be acceptable to the majority of society, never. So the trans community need to be realistic in taking a different identification. A dog can't be a horse even if it's eats hay." This attitude is frankly abhorrent and ignorant, whilst insulting to those of us who deserve equality and respect. Society prospers from being inclusive, compassionate and affording others basic human rights, to live as equals. This simple legal change is a good next-step for the UK. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Instead of getting yourself het up about something based on a list of things that 'could' (but haven't) happened, why not get on with doing something you enjoy and leave others to live their lives as they wish? We are not a mean society and no one cares if you wish to live you life pretending to be a different gender, above everything this is about women. Only born women can take that identification but the trans community are demanding to adopt it. This will never be acceptable to the majority of society, never. So the trans community need to be realistic in taking a different identification. A dog can't be a horse even if it's eats hay. Imagine if as a society, we had taken that stance with race It's not the same comparison though. A black person is a black person because of their physical and observable genetics. They don't have to change any aspect of themselves, they just are. A trans woman can have treatment and surgery to appear and feel like a woman but will never be able to physically transform into a fully functioning biological woman. " No, it's not the same. But I think there are parallels to draw in terms of rights | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Instead of getting yourself het up about something based on a list of things that 'could' (but haven't) happened, why not get on with doing something you enjoy and leave others to live their lives as they wish? We are not a mean society and no one cares if you wish to live you life pretending to be a different gender, above everything this is about women. Only born women can take that identification but the trans community are demanding to adopt it. This will never be acceptable to the majority of society, never. So the trans community need to be realistic in taking a different identification. A dog can't be a horse even if it's eats hay. Imagine if as a society, we had taken that stance with race It's not the same comparison though. A black person is a black person because of their physical and observable genetics. They don't have to change any aspect of themselves, they just are. A trans woman can have treatment and surgery to appear and feel like a woman but will never be able to physically transform into a fully functioning biological woman. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whoever thinks sex pests aren't just going to do what they want, any differently to whether this good new law exists, most probably has shit for brains. Pests will pester and offend, as they can today. Fair point Sophie. " The uglier side of society, individuals who will prey on others, asserting their power for sexual gratification, won't be needing any legal changes, to go out and pester others. They do this today and will continue. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Instead of getting yourself het up about something based on a list of things that 'could' (but haven't) happened, why not get on with doing something you enjoy and leave others to live their lives as they wish? We are not a mean society and no one cares if you wish to live you life pretending to be a different gender, above everything this is about women. Only born women can take that identification but the trans community are demanding to adopt it. This will never be acceptable to the majority of society, never. So the trans community need to be realistic in taking a different identification. A dog can't be a horse even if it's eats hay. Imagine if as a society, we had taken that stance with race It's not the same comparison though. A black person is a black person because of their physical and observable genetics. They don't have to change any aspect of themselves, they just are. A trans woman can have treatment and surgery to appear and feel like a woman but will never be able to physically transform into a fully functioning biological woman. " That's why we, as a decent society, afford others the basic, common decency to achieve their simple needs to be as fully themselves, without undue restrictions and hurtful prejudice, preventing them from getting the freedom and equality, that most of us take for granted, without having to do anything to what is frankly, just living. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whoever thinks sex pests aren't just going to do what they want, any differently to whether this good new law exists, most probably has shit for brains. Pests will pester and offend, as they can today. Fair point Sophie. The uglier side of society, individuals who will prey on others, asserting their power for sexual gratification, won't be needing any legal changes, to go out and pester others. They do this today and will continue. " They do and will. However I think there is still an issue of predatory men (not trans women. *Men*) who will abuse the situation and claim to be female so they can enter women only spaces. Such as DV shelters or swimming sessions etc. And that is what some people are concerned about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are aspects of this legislation that are troubling I think. Its probably right that the process of transitioning should be made easier but I certainly do not agree with lowering the age to 16 particularly with the removal of the need to have a diagnosis of Gender Disphoria. " What specifically troubles you, about the changes being made to support 16 and 17 year olds? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Instead of getting yourself het up about something based on a list of things that 'could' (but haven't) happened, why not get on with doing something you enjoy and leave others to live their lives as they wish? We are not a mean society and no one cares if you wish to live you life pretending to be a different gender, above everything this is about women. Only born women can take that identification but the trans community are demanding to adopt it. This will never be acceptable to the majority of society, never. So the trans community need to be realistic in taking a different identification. A dog can't be a horse even if it's eats hay." But yet it's mainly red faced old men and their male offspring complaining, not women. It's almost at if these people constantly complain about people different to them. Go take your nonsense somewhere where it's wanted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whoever thinks sex pests aren't just going to do what they want, any differently to whether this good new law exists, most probably has shit for brains. Pests will pester and offend, as they can today. Fair point Sophie. The uglier side of society, individuals who will prey on others, asserting their power for sexual gratification, won't be needing any legal changes, to go out and pester others. They do this today and will continue. They do and will. However I think there is still an issue of predatory men (not trans women. *Men*) who will abuse the situation and claim to be female so they can enter women only spaces. Such as DV shelters or swimming sessions etc. And that is what some people are concerned about. " I'm guessing that such predatory men will do this, without taking the months long steps, to try to get access to such spaces? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are aspects of this legislation that are troubling I think. Its probably right that the process of transitioning should be made easier but I certainly do not agree with lowering the age to 16 particularly with the removal of the need to have a diagnosis of Gender Disphoria. What specifically troubles you, about the changes being made to support 16 and 17 year olds? " Specifically, the combination of the lowering of the age to 16 with the removal of the medical diagnosis. Provide support to 16 and 17 year olds by all means (and other age groups). Perhaps maintain the requirement for a medical diagnosis for under 18s, that way they will have the proper conversations with the right people before making this life changing decision. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"a guy could use all female facilities changing rooms toilets apply for a job as a female they can be sent to a female prison rather than male prison There will be some guys out there who have ulterior motives. There are some very shady characters out there who would just love to have legal access to female facilities. If someone identifies as a female whst is wrong with them using female facilities or toilets or applying for a job as their chosen gender? Or being sent to a female prison? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whoever thinks sex pests aren't just going to do what they want, any differently to whether this good new law exists, most probably has shit for brains. Pests will pester and offend, as they can today. Fair point Sophie. The uglier side of society, individuals who will prey on others, asserting their power for sexual gratification, won't be needing any legal changes, to go out and pester others. They do this today and will continue. They do and will. However I think there is still an issue of predatory men (not trans women. *Men*) who will abuse the situation and claim to be female so they can enter women only spaces. Such as DV shelters or swimming sessions etc. And that is what some people are concerned about. I'm guessing that such predatory men will do this, without taking the months long steps, to try to get access to such spaces?" Indeed. I can't speak to all sex segregated places, but no one's ever checked my ID or (as has been suggested in some instances!) examined my genitals* before allowing me access to the toilet or changing rooms. * I have surgical scarring on my lower abdomen. Does this make me not a "real" girl? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are aspects of this legislation that are troubling I think. Its probably right that the process of transitioning should be made easier but I certainly do not agree with lowering the age to 16 particularly with the removal of the need to have a diagnosis of Gender Disphoria. What specifically troubles you, about the changes being made to support 16 and 17 year olds? Specifically, the combination of the lowering of the age to 16 with the removal of the medical diagnosis. Provide support to 16 and 17 year olds by all means (and other age groups). Perhaps maintain the requirement for a medical diagnosis for under 18s, that way they will have the proper conversations with the right people before making this life changing decision. " What will this law enable that you don't approve of, though? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whoever thinks sex pests aren't just going to do what they want, any differently to whether this good new law exists, most probably has shit for brains. Pests will pester and offend, as they can today. Fair point Sophie. The uglier side of society, individuals who will prey on others, asserting their power for sexual gratification, won't be needing any legal changes, to go out and pester others. They do this today and will continue. They do and will. However I think there is still an issue of predatory men (not trans women. *Men*) who will abuse the situation and claim to be female so they can enter women only spaces. Such as DV shelters or swimming sessions etc. And that is what some people are concerned about. I'm guessing that such predatory men will do this, without taking the months long steps, to try to get access to such spaces? Indeed. I can't speak to all sex segregated places, but no one's ever checked my ID or (as has been suggested in some instances!) examined my genitals* before allowing me access to the toilet or changing rooms. * I have surgical scarring on my lower abdomen. Does this make me not a "real" girl? " This consternation that some have, seems like a fabricated issue, that ignores the fact that predatory sex pests will do whatever they want to, regardless of any legal support for equality. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whoever thinks sex pests aren't just going to do what they want, any differently to whether this good new law exists, most probably has shit for brains. Pests will pester and offend, as they can today. Fair point Sophie. The uglier side of society, individuals who will prey on others, asserting their power for sexual gratification, won't be needing any legal changes, to go out and pester others. They do this today and will continue. They do and will. However I think there is still an issue of predatory men (not trans women. *Men*) who will abuse the situation and claim to be female so they can enter women only spaces. Such as DV shelters or swimming sessions etc. And that is what some people are concerned about. I'm guessing that such predatory men will do this, without taking the months long steps, to try to get access to such spaces? Indeed. I can't speak to all sex segregated places, but no one's ever checked my ID or (as has been suggested in some instances!) examined my genitals* before allowing me access to the toilet or changing rooms. * I have surgical scarring on my lower abdomen. Does this make me not a "real" girl? This consternation that some have, seems like a fabricated issue, that ignores the fact that predatory sex pests will do whatever they want to, regardless of any legal support for equality. " Exactly. No predatory man is going to think that this is a gateway in to abuse. It may, and it's a big may, open up an opportunity to a predatory mam but they'd be looking at ways to abuse and attack women without thos legislation | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whoever thinks sex pests aren't just going to do what they want, any differently to whether this good new law exists, most probably has shit for brains. Pests will pester and offend, as they can today. Fair point Sophie. The uglier side of society, individuals who will prey on others, asserting their power for sexual gratification, won't be needing any legal changes, to go out and pester others. They do this today and will continue. They do and will. However I think there is still an issue of predatory men (not trans women. *Men*) who will abuse the situation and claim to be female so they can enter women only spaces. Such as DV shelters or swimming sessions etc. And that is what some people are concerned about. I'm guessing that such predatory men will do this, without taking the months long steps, to try to get access to such spaces? Indeed. I can't speak to all sex segregated places, but no one's ever checked my ID or (as has been suggested in some instances!) examined my genitals* before allowing me access to the toilet or changing rooms. * I have surgical scarring on my lower abdomen. Does this make me not a "real" girl? This consternation that some have, seems like a fabricated issue, that ignores the fact that predatory sex pests will do whatever they want to, regardless of any legal support for equality. " Indeed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whoever thinks sex pests aren't just going to do what they want, any differently to whether this good new law exists, most probably has shit for brains. Pests will pester and offend, as they can today. Fair point Sophie. The uglier side of society, individuals who will prey on others, asserting their power for sexual gratification, won't be needing any legal changes, to go out and pester others. They do this today and will continue. They do and will. However I think there is still an issue of predatory men (not trans women. *Men*) who will abuse the situation and claim to be female so they can enter women only spaces. Such as DV shelters or swimming sessions etc. And that is what some people are concerned about. I'm guessing that such predatory men will do this, without taking the months long steps, to try to get access to such spaces? Indeed. I can't speak to all sex segregated places, but no one's ever checked my ID or (as has been suggested in some instances!) examined my genitals* before allowing me access to the toilet or changing rooms. * I have surgical scarring on my lower abdomen. Does this make me not a "real" girl? This consternation that some have, seems like a fabricated issue, that ignores the fact that predatory sex pests will do whatever they want to, regardless of any legal support for equality. Exactly. No predatory man is going to think that this is a gateway in to abuse. It may, and it's a big may, open up an opportunity to a predatory mam but they'd be looking at ways to abuse and attack women without thos legislation" And meanwhile - requiring ID to pee, or giving people physical exams has been suggested. I have surgical scarring on my abdomen (because my reproductive system is a hellbeast and I needed emergency surgery). Would the genital examiner at the loo wonder if that made me secretly a man and deny my right to pee? Also are we only examining people who are clearly over 18 or are we subjecting children to unnecessary examination of private parts? Also what will this do to retraumatise victims of violence? Why can't we just let people pee? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't care what people wish to identify as, I won't recognise it anyway!! That's not very nice. " If they have a right to identify as a tree then surely I have a right to ignore it! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't care what people wish to identify as, I won't recognise it anyway!! It's a fair point. People have an equal right to reject or accept changes to society norms." This! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whoever thinks sex pests aren't just going to do what they want, any differently to whether this good new law exists, most probably has shit for brains. Pests will pester and offend, as they can today. Fair point Sophie. The uglier side of society, individuals who will prey on others, asserting their power for sexual gratification, won't be needing any legal changes, to go out and pester others. They do this today and will continue. They do and will. However I think there is still an issue of predatory men (not trans women. *Men*) who will abuse the situation and claim to be female so they can enter women only spaces. Such as DV shelters or swimming sessions etc. And that is what some people are concerned about. I'm guessing that such predatory men will do this, without taking the months long steps, to try to get access to such spaces? Indeed. I can't speak to all sex segregated places, but no one's ever checked my ID or (as has been suggested in some instances!) examined my genitals* before allowing me access to the toilet or changing rooms. * I have surgical scarring on my lower abdomen. Does this make me not a "real" girl? This consternation that some have, seems like a fabricated issue, that ignores the fact that predatory sex pests will do whatever they want to, regardless of any legal support for equality. Exactly. No predatory man is going to think that this is a gateway in to abuse. It may, and it's a big may, open up an opportunity to a predatory mam but they'd be looking at ways to abuse and attack women without thos legislation And meanwhile - requiring ID to pee, or giving people physical exams has been suggested. I have surgical scarring on my abdomen (because my reproductive system is a hellbeast and I needed emergency surgery). Would the genital examiner at the loo wonder if that made me secretly a man and deny my right to pee? Also are we only examining people who are clearly over 18 or are we subjecting children to unnecessary examination of private parts? Also what will this do to retraumatise victims of violence? Why can't we just let people pee?" Just read in one of the rags that Westminster is set to block the controversial law as they call it. Sounds like a clear cut case of pee blocking… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who remembers that guy who died a few years ago who got his body tattooed like a cat, his upper lip split with cheek and nose surgery to look like a cat, he even had his teeth sharpened, ears shaped and whisker implants... He identified as a cat... Do people seriously think he was an actual real cat the same way we are being forced to believe trans men and women are real men and women? You don't even have to do anything to change genders now, I'll keep my name I'll keep my beard I'll keep my cock and balls I won't change a single thing about myself, my appearance or my life but from now on you must believe I am a real woman otherwise you are a piece of shit biggot. The world continues to make sense." This post isn't as clever as you think it is. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are aspects of this legislation that are troubling I think. Its probably right that the process of transitioning should be made easier but I certainly do not agree with lowering the age to 16 particularly with the removal of the need to have a diagnosis of Gender Disphoria. " Do you know what the average waiting time is for the gender service? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who remembers that guy who died a few years ago who got his body tattooed like a cat, his upper lip split with cheek and nose surgery to look like a cat, he even had his teeth sharpened, ears shaped and whisker implants... He identified as a cat... Do people seriously think he was an actual real cat the same way we are being forced to believe trans men and women are real men and women? You don't even have to do anything to change genders now, I'll keep my name I'll keep my beard I'll keep my cock and balls I won't change a single thing about myself, my appearance or my life but from now on you must believe I am a real woman otherwise you are a piece of shit biggot. The world continues to make sense." You don’t have to believe it, if it makes the person happy and content with themselves, it’s all fine. It doesn’t affect me but I can empathise with someone who goes through such a huge life changing process. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who remembers that guy who died a few years ago who got his body tattooed like a cat, his upper lip split with cheek and nose surgery to look like a cat, he even had his teeth sharpened, ears shaped and whisker implants... He identified as a cat... Do people seriously think he was an actual real cat the same way we are being forced to believe trans men and women are real men and women? You don't even have to do anything to change genders now, I'll keep my name I'll keep my beard I'll keep my cock and balls I won't change a single thing about myself, my appearance or my life but from now on you must believe I am a real woman otherwise you are a piece of shit biggot. The world continues to make sense." Leaving aside the entirely pointless cat thing, you don't actually have to believe anyone is anything if you don't want to. All you have to do is leave people alone to live their lives and not insult or bully them or interfere with their hard won rights. I reckon you can manage that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who remembers that guy who died a few years ago who got his body tattooed like a cat, his upper lip split with cheek and nose surgery to look like a cat, he even had his teeth sharpened, ears shaped and whisker implants... He identified as a cat... Do people seriously think he was an actual real cat the same way we are being forced to believe trans men and women are real men and women? You don't even have to do anything to change genders now, I'll keep my name I'll keep my beard I'll keep my cock and balls I won't change a single thing about myself, my appearance or my life but from now on you must believe I am a real woman otherwise you are a piece of shit biggot. The world continues to make sense. Leaving aside the entirely pointless cat thing, you don't actually have to believe anyone is anything if you don't want to. All you have to do is leave people alone to live their lives and not insult or bully them or interfere with their hard won rights. I reckon you can manage that? " Pretty much | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who remembers that guy who died a few years ago who got his body tattooed like a cat, his upper lip split with cheek and nose surgery to look like a cat, he even had his teeth sharpened, ears shaped and whisker implants... He identified as a cat... Do people seriously think he was an actual real cat the same way we are being forced to believe trans men and women are real men and women? You don't even have to do anything to change genders now, I'll keep my name I'll keep my beard I'll keep my cock and balls I won't change a single thing about myself, my appearance or my life but from now on you must believe I am a real woman otherwise you are a piece of shit biggot. The world continues to make sense. Leaving aside the entirely pointless cat thing, you don't actually have to believe anyone is anything if you don't want to. All you have to do is leave people alone to live their lives and not insult or bully them or interfere with their hard won rights. I reckon you can manage that? " Your right, I dont believe in any of the nonsense things people pretend to be but I do accept it, I'm friends with and related to several trans people who I have zero problems with, I refer to them how they choose and treat them with respect and how they want to be treated and for the most part none of it affects me and my life in the slightest... My problem is reality, we are allowing people to go around doing whatever they want pretending to be anything they can think of and often changing it up as they see fit and we just allow it because it's polite, how can we function as a society and set rules and laws when people are taking the piss like the whole trans in sports or jail or bathroom debate where safety is an issue. There's a girl in an American school that identifies a a cat, she's been given her own toilet with a litter tray... what if she gets ill do they send her to the vet? Is she going to grow and mentally develop correctly if they continue to allow her to act this way, at what point does it become a concern for her wellbeing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who remembers that guy who died a few years ago who got his body tattooed like a cat, his upper lip split with cheek and nose surgery to look like a cat, he even had his teeth sharpened, ears shaped and whisker implants... He identified as a cat... Do people seriously think he was an actual real cat the same way we are being forced to believe trans men and women are real men and women? You don't even have to do anything to change genders now, I'll keep my name I'll keep my beard I'll keep my cock and balls I won't change a single thing about myself, my appearance or my life but from now on you must believe I am a real woman otherwise you are a piece of shit biggot. The world continues to make sense. Leaving aside the entirely pointless cat thing, you don't actually have to believe anyone is anything if you don't want to. All you have to do is leave people alone to live their lives and not insult or bully them or interfere with their hard won rights. I reckon you can manage that? Your right, I dont believe in any of the nonsense things people pretend to be but I do accept it, I'm friends with and related to several trans people who I have zero problems with, I refer to them how they choose and treat them with respect and how they want to be treated and for the most part none of it affects me and my life in the slightest... My problem is reality, we are allowing people to go around doing whatever they want pretending to be anything they can think of and often changing it up as they see fit and we just allow it because it's polite, how can we function as a society and set rules and laws when people are taking the piss like the whole trans in sports or jail or bathroom debate where safety is an issue. There's a girl in an American school that identifies a a cat, she's been given her own toilet with a litter tray... what if she gets ill do they send her to the vet? Is she going to grow and mentally develop correctly if they continue to allow her to act this way, at what point does it become a concern for her wellbeing?" Big "I'm not racist because I have black friends" energy here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who remembers that guy who died a few years ago who got his body tattooed like a cat, his upper lip split with cheek and nose surgery to look like a cat, he even had his teeth sharpened, ears shaped and whisker implants... He identified as a cat... Do people seriously think he was an actual real cat the same way we are being forced to believe trans men and women are real men and women? You don't even have to do anything to change genders now, I'll keep my name I'll keep my beard I'll keep my cock and balls I won't change a single thing about myself, my appearance or my life but from now on you must believe I am a real woman otherwise you are a piece of shit biggot. The world continues to make sense. Leaving aside the entirely pointless cat thing, you don't actually have to believe anyone is anything if you don't want to. All you have to do is leave people alone to live their lives and not insult or bully them or interfere with their hard won rights. I reckon you can manage that? Your right, I dont believe in any of the nonsense things people pretend to be but I do accept it, I'm friends with and related to several trans people who I have zero problems with, I refer to them how they choose and treat them with respect and how they want to be treated and for the most part none of it affects me and my life in the slightest... My problem is reality, we are allowing people to go around doing whatever they want pretending to be anything they can think of and often changing it up as they see fit and we just allow it because it's polite, how can we function as a society and set rules and laws when people are taking the piss like the whole trans in sports or jail or bathroom debate where safety is an issue. There's a girl in an American school that identifies a a cat, she's been given her own toilet with a litter tray... what if she gets ill do they send her to the vet? Is she going to grow and mentally develop correctly if they continue to allow her to act this way, at what point does it become a concern for her wellbeing? Big "I'm not racist because I have black friends" energy here." I don't see that at all. Its just someone with a different opinion. Which is allowed without being called out and disparaged. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who remembers that guy who died a few years ago who got his body tattooed like a cat, his upper lip split with cheek and nose surgery to look like a cat, he even had his teeth sharpened, ears shaped and whisker implants... He identified as a cat... Do people seriously think he was an actual real cat the same way we are being forced to believe trans men and women are real men and women? You don't even have to do anything to change genders now, I'll keep my name I'll keep my beard I'll keep my cock and balls I won't change a single thing about myself, my appearance or my life but from now on you must believe I am a real woman otherwise you are a piece of shit biggot. The world continues to make sense. Leaving aside the entirely pointless cat thing, you don't actually have to believe anyone is anything if you don't want to. All you have to do is leave people alone to live their lives and not insult or bully them or interfere with their hard won rights. I reckon you can manage that? Your right, I dont believe in any of the nonsense things people pretend to be but I do accept it, I'm friends with and related to several trans people who I have zero problems with, I refer to them how they choose and treat them with respect and how they want to be treated and for the most part none of it affects me and my life in the slightest... My problem is reality, we are allowing people to go around doing whatever they want pretending to be anything they can think of and often changing it up as they see fit and we just allow it because it's polite, how can we function as a society and set rules and laws when people are taking the piss like the whole trans in sports or jail or bathroom debate where safety is an issue. There's a girl in an American school that identifies a a cat, she's been given her own toilet with a litter tray... what if she gets ill do they send her to the vet? Is she going to grow and mentally develop correctly if they continue to allow her to act this way, at what point does it become a concern for her wellbeing? Big "I'm not racist because I have black friends" energy here." Yeah ok, I respect your opinion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s very rare for me to comment on these kinds of threads as it can really degenerate quickly and can have a massive impact on my own mental health. All I wanted to say this time was a big thank you to all those who are saying the most important thing, “be nice”. I truly don’t care if you think I or others like me are a woman or not, all I ask is that you be nice about it. That can’t be too much to ask can it ? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I couldn't resist reading this one. Now very much wishing I hadn't. I just wanted to say that if anyone out there has read this and felt upset by it in the same way then please do reach out, my inbox is open. Amy x " Agreed there are some nasty people out there who simply don't understand....... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who remembers that guy who died a few years ago who got his body tattooed like a cat, his upper lip split with cheek and nose surgery to look like a cat, he even had his teeth sharpened, ears shaped and whisker implants... He identified as a cat... Do people seriously think he was an actual real cat the same way we are being forced to believe trans men and women are real men and women? You don't even have to do anything to change genders now, I'll keep my name I'll keep my beard I'll keep my cock and balls I won't change a single thing about myself, my appearance or my life but from now on you must believe I am a real woman otherwise you are a piece of shit biggot. The world continues to make sense. This post isn't as clever as you think it is." With some you have to feel sorry for them and their thoughts, quite thick really..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are aspects of this legislation that are troubling I think. Its probably right that the process of transitioning should be made easier but I certainly do not agree with lowering the age to 16 particularly with the removal of the need to have a diagnosis of Gender Disphoria. Do you know what the average waiting time is for the gender service?" He wouldn't know, he's a classic transphobe and doesn't even know it...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s very rare for me to comment on these kinds of threads as it can really degenerate quickly and can have a massive impact on my own mental health. All I wanted to say this time was a big thank you to all those who are saying the most important thing, “be nice”. I truly don’t care if you think I or others like me are a woman or not, all I ask is that you be nice about it. That can’t be too much to ask can it ? " There are some nasty bastar** in society, we all know that. Unfortunately some of them are in here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are aspects of this legislation that are troubling I think. Its probably right that the process of transitioning should be made easier but I certainly do not agree with lowering the age to 16 particularly with the removal of the need to have a diagnosis of Gender Disphoria. Do you know what the average waiting time is for the gender service? He wouldn't know, he's a classic transphobe and doesn't even know it......" Are you calling the person a transphobe because they are questioning the lowering of age to 16? They clearly say the process needs to be made easier. If you are can you explain why that makes the person a transphobe? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are aspects of this legislation that are troubling I think. Its probably right that the process of transitioning should be made easier but I certainly do not agree with lowering the age to 16 particularly with the removal of the need to have a diagnosis of Gender Disphoria. Do you know what the average waiting time is for the gender service?" That may be an issue around resources. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are aspects of this legislation that are troubling I think. Its probably right that the process of transitioning should be made easier but I certainly do not agree with lowering the age to 16 particularly with the removal of the need to have a diagnosis of Gender Disphoria. Do you know what the average waiting time is for the gender service? He wouldn't know, he's a classic transphobe and doesn't even know it......" I dont believe I'm transphobic at all. I think you perhaps made that comment to deliberately provoke a reaction and well done, you have succeded. Disagreeing with the legislation does not make anyone transphobic and its comments like yours that attempt to shut down the debate in favour of Trans rights over and above any others. I completely agree that the process of transitioning should be a simple as possible but that doesnt mean that there shouldn't be checks and balances in the system and absolutely for 16 and 17 year olds that should include medical profesionals. You can hate me and call me transphobic if you want. That says more about you than me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are aspects of this legislation that are troubling I think. Its probably right that the process of transitioning should be made easier but I certainly do not agree with lowering the age to 16 particularly with the removal of the need to have a diagnosis of Gender Disphoria. Do you know what the average waiting time is for the gender service? He wouldn't know, he's a classic transphobe and doesn't even know it...... I dont believe I'm transphobic at all. I think you perhaps made that comment to deliberately provoke a reaction and well done, you have succeded. Disagreeing with the legislation does not make anyone transphobic and its comments like yours that attempt to shut down the debate in favour of Trans rights over and above any others. I completely agree that the process of transitioning should be a simple as possible but that doesnt mean that there shouldn't be checks and balances in the system and absolutely for 16 and 17 year olds that should include medical profesionals. You can hate me and call me transphobic if you want. That says more about you than me." Well said. I think many times people need to learn the proper meaning of words and understand other people might hold varying opinions without resorting to insult. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The day we stop assigning labels to people & look at accepting each other as human beings the World will become a much more tranquil place. Everyone has their own views, and admittedly I did laugh at one the comments made above about every pound collected for guessing sex equating to a total of £2. Some peeps merely look at the gender from a reproductive kindest female giving birth. In all, we all simply need to be a lot more tolerant & show kindness. No need for belittling anyone. We are after all one species and breath the same air. " Everyone loves a label. Means we can continue to be lazy and not engage our brain. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Actually step away from this thread candyfloss! X " Be well. You and your family. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Actually step away from this thread candyfloss! X Be well. You and your family." ty u 2 x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does it matter at all what gender someone identifies as?" most definitely | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |