FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > No Bi guy preference
No Bi guy preference
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why is it understandable for couples? Do they assume that the bi guy can’t play straight or that they’re not going to be able to keep themselves from touching the guy? That’s just as phobic" Fair point, entirely understandable probably not the best choice of wording from me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It’s because small minded people think bi guys are sexually promiscuous - which is very ironic given this is a swingers website. " its funny as its often these same silly cunts that are out there getting ragged silly in carparks/gangbangs/ weekly meets / sleazy venues etc irony is always amusing on some | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 ) fear that their "world's best BJ skills" will have been shown up
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Possibly a (unfounded) fear of a disease. Possibly a (unfounded) fear of the guy getting touchy feely with the man of a couple. Possibly a (maybe founded ) fear that their "world's best BJ skills" will have been shown up
"The last one..... Definitely true. 
A | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So looking through profiles and whatnot I see a fair few folks have a preference for straight guys. Entirely understandable when it comes to couples I guess, but I'm at a loss to understand it for singles. Anyone know why this is? " l OP it'll ne an extremely rare occasion when someone gives you a straight (pun intended) personal view on this question. Why? Here's my take. It can't be anything to do with the physical attributes of bi men, as like straight and gay men they come in all shapes and sizes, ages, ethnicities, heights, hair colours, dick sizes etc. You could line up 100 straight, bi and gay men and nobody could accurately pick who was what sexuality by sight. So given that fact it has to be a psychological issue to do with something negative associated with bi men in terms of behaviour. I know what I'm sure it is. But I've only seen one person recently that's openly admitted it in a forum thread. A | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So looking through profiles and whatnot I see a fair few folks have a preference for straight guys. Entirely understandable when it comes to couples I guess, but I'm at a loss to understand it for singles. Anyone know why this is? l OP it'll ne an extremely rare occasion when someone gives you a straight (pun intended) personal view on this question. Why? Here's my take. It can't be anything to do with the physical attributes of bi men, as like straight and gay men they come in all shapes and sizes, ages, ethnicities, heights, hair colours, dick sizes etc. You could line up 100 straight, bi and gay men and nobody could accurately pick who was what sexuality by sight. So given that fact it has to be a psychological issue to do with something negative associated with bi men in terms of behaviour. I know what I'm sure it is. But I've only seen one person recently that's openly admitted it in a forum thread. A" We all know what it is. And it’s disgusting prejudice.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why is it prejudice that the thought of two guys is a turn off? " That’s fair enough but they wouldn’t be watching that. It would be one on one straight sex. It’s like refusing to meet someone because they ate marmite last year | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why is it prejudice that the thought of two guys is a turn off? That’s fair enough but they wouldn’t be watching that. It would be one on one straight sex. It’s like refusing to meet someone because they ate marmite last year" I block everybody that eat’s marmite | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why is it prejudice that the thought of two guys is a turn off? That’s fair enough but they wouldn’t be watching that. It would be one on one straight sex. It’s like refusing to meet someone because they ate marmite last year I block everybody that eat’s marmite " Me too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well maybe if a woman finds the thoughts of guy on guy a turn off they might be put off a bi man, same as if she finds the thoughts of guy on guy a turn on she might seek a bi man. I hate receiving oral, if a guy obviously really enjoys it then it's a turn off for me so I avoid them." But you don't find it necessary to add to your profile, "will not meet a man that's gone down on a woman before." Gbat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why is it prejudice that the thought of two guys is a turn off? That’s fair enough but they wouldn’t be watching that. It would be one on one straight sex. It’s like refusing to meet someone because they ate marmite last year I block everybody that eat’s marmite " That explains why so many people have two profiles; one marmite/curious the other non marmite. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
.
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well maybe if a woman finds the thoughts of guy on guy a turn off they might be put off a bi man, same as if she finds the thoughts of guy on guy a turn on she might seek a bi man. I hate receiving oral, if a guy obviously really enjoys it then it's a turn off for me so I avoid them. But you don't find it necessary to add to your profile, "will not meet a man that's gone down on a woman before." Gbat " No as I don't find men giving oral sex to other women a turn off, as long as they aren't doing it to me  . if I found the thought of men having sex with men a turn off then I wouldn't meet men who have sex with men. same as I dont like to meet men who are big into oral sex as it's a turn off.
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
"Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter? The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice "Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind. You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues? By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them. You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
"So, what do you think it is then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
"other than anyone who says they don't want a gal whoa slept with lots of ppl ... I cant think of any examples outaide of biness where this kicks in I've never seen a profile prefilter based on if someone has partaken in sc@t say. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice "^ Nailed it! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
^ Nailed it! "No, he hasn't. It's a turn off for some. It seems quite arrogant to assume everyone should find it appealing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
^ Nailed it!
No, he hasn't.
It's a turn off for some.
It seems quite arrogant to assume everyone should find it appealing."It should be neither appealing or unappealing as it bears no relevance on how they play with you unless you are prejudiced? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
^ Nailed it!
No, he hasn't.
It's a turn off for some.
It seems quite arrogant to assume everyone should find it appealing.
It should be neither appealing or unappealing as it bears no relevance on how they play with you unless you are prejudiced? "It is relevant to whoever wants it to be. How can you say what one person finds relevant or not? Why is it so difficult for you to accept that some people just don't find the thought sexual? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying? "No, that’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying that previous sexual encounters have zero bearing, it’s not about being turned on by or not being turned on by someone’s previous partners. Those previous partners have no relevance. No relevance unless the other person decides it to be an issue | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
^ Nailed it!
No, he hasn't.
It's a turn off for some.
It seems quite arrogant to assume everyone should find it appealing.
It should be neither appealing or unappealing as it bears no relevance on how they play with you unless you are prejudiced?
It is relevant to whoever wants it to be. How can you say what one person finds relevant or not?
Why is it so difficult for you to accept that some people just don't find the thought sexual? "Why on earth would you be thinking about someone’s previous sexual partners when you are having sex / meeting them with them?! Bizarre | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In a nutshell ‘bi girls = hot, bi guys = ew you dirty bastards’" Erm I disagree. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying?
No, that’s not what I’m saying.
I’m saying that previous sexual encounters have zero bearing, it’s not about being turned on by or not being turned on by someone’s previous partners. Those previous partners have no relevance.
No relevance unless the other person decides it to be an issue"There’s loads I won’t meet over the years because of who they’ve met. That ok with you? Or do you wanna label with me something? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
^ Nailed it!
No, he hasn't.
It's a turn off for some.
It seems quite arrogant to assume everyone should find it appealing.
It should be neither appealing or unappealing as it bears no relevance on how they play with you unless you are prejudiced?
It is relevant to whoever wants it to be. How can you say what one person finds relevant or not?
Why is it so difficult for you to accept that some people just don't find the thought sexual?
Why on earth would you be thinking about someone’s previous sexual partners when you are having sex / meeting them with them?! Bizarre "Why on earth do you think you have the right to tell people what to think or label them? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In a nutshell ‘bi girls = hot, bi guys = ew you dirty bastards’" Bi guys like other mens nutshells | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So looking through profiles and whatnot I see a fair few folks have a preference for straight guys. Entirely understandable when it comes to couples I guess, but I'm at a loss to understand it for singles. Anyone know why this is? " so many so called str8 guys on here are bi but hide behind a str8 sexuality so they get to meet single ladies and couples i have seen the names of dozens of guys who have asked to meet and fuck me on the veri list of couples who have "no bi men" it makes me laugh to know they have been conned,,, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think it's an easy conclusion to jump to, assuming all people who won't have sex with a bi person as prejudice. That, in itself, is an example of prejudice. Judging all people of a specific group the same. How ironic. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So I like bi guys (specially bearded tattooed ones if any are reading this). So that wouldn't bother me. But, I have previously been put off guys from who they've met. We all have our likes and dislikes. " tbh someone's history has made me feel different. But o will also admit that's me making a judgement call. Judging some because of a specific action is probably okay (albeit I do feel a bit of dick). Judging a whole group of ppl because of sexuality. I'm less sure. I feel the profiles that say "no Indians" are ln the wrong side of the line even tho I can see an argument about physical attraction. For me, "no bi guys" is a step beyond as it's not even part of attraction from what I can see. I dunno. I feel a profile that had "no single mums" or "low body count only" would get more heat than "no bi". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So I like bi guys (specially bearded tattooed ones if any are reading this). So that wouldn't bother me. But, I have previously been put off guys from who they've met. We all have our likes and dislikes. tbh someone's history has made me feel different. But o will also admit that's me making a judgement call. Judging some because of a specific action is probably okay (albeit I do feel a bit of dick). Judging a whole group of ppl because of sexuality. I'm less sure. I feel the profiles that say "no Indians" are ln the wrong side of the line even tho I can see an argument about physical attraction. For me, "no bi guys" is a step beyond as it's not even part of attraction from what I can see. I dunno. I feel a profile that had "no single mums" or "low body count only" would get more heat than "no bi". " I'll admit when I first joined I would deliberately avoid bi guys. Now I actively look for them! But it's their choice, you may not like it, you may not agree with, they may have their reason, or they may just be homophobic dicks. Whatever the reason , let them get on with it. Fyi I like bi guys, have I mentioned that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So I like bi guys (specially bearded tattooed ones if any are reading this). So that wouldn't bother me. But, I have previously been put off guys from who they've met. We all have our likes and dislikes. tbh someone's history has made me feel different. But o will also admit that's me making a judgement call. Judging some because of a specific action is probably okay (albeit I do feel a bit of dick). Judging a whole group of ppl because of sexuality. I'm less sure. I feel the profiles that say "no Indians" are ln the wrong side of the line even tho I can see an argument about physical attraction. For me, "no bi guys" is a step beyond as it's not even part of attraction from what I can see. I dunno. I feel a profile that had "no single mums" or "low body count only" would get more heat than "no bi". I'll admit when I first joined I would deliberately avoid bi guys. Now I actively look for them! But it's their choice, you may not like it, you may not agree with, they may have their reason, or they may just be homophobic dicks. Whatever the reason , let them get on with it. Fyi I like bi guys, have I mentioned that? " You did. I'm growing a beard.
No issue my end. Like grumpy, it's useful to know that someone isn't into me.
However I'd also say that if this does come from prejudice, there's a degree of responsibility to challenge it. I'd do that if I had skin in the game or not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So I like bi guys (specially bearded tattooed ones if any are reading this). So that wouldn't bother me. But, I have previously been put off guys from who they've met. We all have our likes and dislikes. tbh someone's history has made me feel different. But o will also admit that's me making a judgement call. Judging some because of a specific action is probably okay (albeit I do feel a bit of dick). Judging a whole group of ppl because of sexuality. I'm less sure. I feel the profiles that say "no Indians" are ln the wrong side of the line even tho I can see an argument about physical attraction. For me, "no bi guys" is a step beyond as it's not even part of attraction from what I can see. I dunno. I feel a profile that had "no single mums" or "low body count only" would get more heat than "no bi". I'll admit when I first joined I would deliberately avoid bi guys. Now I actively look for them! But it's their choice, you may not like it, you may not agree with, they may have their reason, or they may just be homophobic dicks. Whatever the reason , let them get on with it. Fyi I like bi guys, have I mentioned that? You did. I'm growing a beard.
No issue my end. Like grumpy, it's useful to know that someone isn't into me.
However I'd also say that if this does come from prejudice, there's a degree of responsibility to challenge it. I'd do that if I had skin in the game or not. "Well fuck me I didn't realise you were bi. Hey  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So I like bi guys (specially bearded tattooed ones if any are reading this). So that wouldn't bother me. But, I have previously been put off guys from who they've met. We all have our likes and dislikes. tbh someone's history has made me feel different. But o will also admit that's me making a judgement call. Judging some because of a specific action is probably okay (albeit I do feel a bit of dick). Judging a whole group of ppl because of sexuality. I'm less sure. I feel the profiles that say "no Indians" are ln the wrong side of the line even tho I can see an argument about physical attraction. For me, "no bi guys" is a step beyond as it's not even part of attraction from what I can see. I dunno. I feel a profile that had "no single mums" or "low body count only" would get more heat than "no bi". I'll admit when I first joined I would deliberately avoid bi guys. Now I actively look for them! But it's their choice, you may not like it, you may not agree with, they may have their reason, or they may just be homophobic dicks. Whatever the reason , let them get on with it. Fyi I like bi guys, have I mentioned that? You did. I'm growing a beard.
No issue my end. Like grumpy, it's useful to know that someone isn't into me.
However I'd also say that if this does come from prejudice, there's a degree of responsibility to challenge it. I'd do that if I had skin in the game or not.
Well fuck me I didn't realise you were bi.
Hey "disgusting positive discrimation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So I like bi guys (specially bearded tattooed ones if any are reading this). So that wouldn't bother me. But, I have previously been put off guys from who they've met. We all have our likes and dislikes. tbh someone's history has made me feel different. But o will also admit that's me making a judgement call. Judging some because of a specific action is probably okay (albeit I do feel a bit of dick). Judging a whole group of ppl because of sexuality. I'm less sure. I feel the profiles that say "no Indians" are ln the wrong side of the line even tho I can see an argument about physical attraction. For me, "no bi guys" is a step beyond as it's not even part of attraction from what I can see. I dunno. I feel a profile that had "no single mums" or "low body count only" would get more heat than "no bi". I'll admit when I first joined I would deliberately avoid bi guys. Now I actively look for them! But it's their choice, you may not like it, you may not agree with, they may have their reason, or they may just be homophobic dicks. Whatever the reason , let them get on with it. Fyi I like bi guys, have I mentioned that? You did. I'm growing a beard.
No issue my end. Like grumpy, it's useful to know that someone isn't into me.
However I'd also say that if this does come from prejudice, there's a degree of responsibility to challenge it. I'd do that if I had skin in the game or not.
Well fuck me I didn't realise you were bi.
Hey disgusting positive discrimation. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction " I get turned off by the thought of someone having a shit, doesn’t mean I won’t meet anyone who has defecated in their lifetime! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I get turned off by the thought of someone having a shit, doesn’t mean I won’t meet anyone who has defecated in their lifetime! "Yeah but we all shit so would be screwed in a really bad way if that put you off | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I get turned off by the thought of someone having a shit, doesn’t mean I won’t meet anyone who has defecated in their lifetime! "I block everybody that shits | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I get turned off by the thought of someone having a shit, doesn’t mean I won’t meet anyone who has defecated in their lifetime!
I block everybody that shits "Me too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why is it prejudice that the thought of two guys is a turn off? That’s fair enough but they wouldn’t be watching that. It would be one on one straight sex. It’s like refusing to meet someone because they ate marmite last year" To be fair....if someone ate marmite in front of me I wouldn't let their mouth anywhere near me until it had been jetwashed. A | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction " I half get that ... But there is very few other areas that are publically aired. I also think there is something to explore why it is such a big turn off. I'm struggling to empathise with any other examples that aren't illegal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I get turned off by the thought of someone having a shit, doesn’t mean I won’t meet anyone who has defecated in their lifetime!
Yeah but we all shit so would be screwed in a really bad way if that put you off "that fella from north Korea didn't. He was top of my wank bank for that reason. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice "Perhaps it not prejudice.. They just think you are a knob . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I half get that ... But there is very few other areas that are publically aired. I also think there is something to explore why it is such a big turn off. I'm struggling to empathise with any other examples that aren't illegal. " What's to explore about it? I was seeing someone that asked me if I had ever done anything with another guy and I said no because I hadn't and she said thank got for that because it would kill the passion. She has gay and bi friends so it's not a homophobic thing, it really is just a preference. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Perhaps it not prejudice..
They just think you are a knob
."Well | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I get turned off by the thought of someone having a shit, doesn’t mean I won’t meet anyone who has defecated in their lifetime!
Yeah but we all shit so would be screwed in a really bad way if that put you off that fella from north Korea didn't. He was top of my wank bank for that reason. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So looking through profiles and whatnot I see a fair few folks have a preference for straight guys. Entirely understandable when it comes to couples I guess, but I'm at a loss to understand it for singles. Anyone know why this is? so many so called str8 guys on here are bi but hide behind a str8 sexuality so they get to meet single ladies and couples i have seen the names of dozens of guys who have asked to meet and fuck me on the veri list of couples who have "no bi men" it makes me laugh to know they have been conned,,, "So many bi guys lie to get a fuck eh. Perhaps that's what puts some people off. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I half get that ... But there is very few other areas that are publically aired. I also think there is something to explore why it is such a big turn off. I'm struggling to empathise with any other examples that aren't illegal. What's to explore about it? I was seeing someone that asked me if I had ever done anything with another guy and I said no because I hadn't and she said thank got for that because it would kill the passion. She has gay and bi friends so it's not a homophobic thing, it really is just a preference. " Playing devil's advocate..a couple of questions. Had you already slept together and if so how would you have felt if after a dozen or so shags after which she seems more than happy with you and your ongoing sexual activities.... she asks that question and you say yes. At which point she ends things. Despite the fact that all was fine before the question was asked, you're still the same person you were when you were sleeping together - nothings changed bar the answer to one question. Does anyone think that doesn't display some form of prejudice? Ignorance in that case would have been bliss. A 'no', despite being a fib, would have likely meant a continuation of sex. A | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So looking through profiles and whatnot I see a fair few folks have a preference for straight guys. Entirely understandable when it comes to couples I guess, but I'm at a loss to understand it for singles. Anyone know why this is? so many so called str8 guys on here are bi but hide behind a str8 sexuality so they get to meet single ladies and couples i have seen the names of dozens of guys who have asked to meet and fuck me on the veri list of couples who have "no bi men" it makes me laugh to know they have been conned,,,
So many bi guys lie to get a fuck eh. Perhaps that's what puts some people off."Agreed and they are often more devious | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Perhaps it not prejudice..
They just think you are a knob
."I block anybody who’s a knob | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think they're worried about numbers for catering, in case it's bi one, get one free. "Oh Tina, never change! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I half get that ... But there is very few other areas that are publically aired. I also think there is something to explore why it is such a big turn off. I'm struggling to empathise with any other examples that aren't illegal. What's to explore about it? I was seeing someone that asked me if I had ever done anything with another guy and I said no because I hadn't and she said thank got for that because it would kill the passion. She has gay and bi friends so it's not a homophobic thing, it really is just a preference. " I've been asked that question. I have never been asked about any other passion killers. Maybe it's because being bi is more prevalent than sc@t (my biggest turn off), but noone has ever said to me that doing xyz in my past is a deal breaker. Other than my sexuality. That's the bit I struggle with. It seems to be treated inconsistently with other things. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So looking through profiles and whatnot I see a fair few folks have a preference for straight guys. Entirely understandable when it comes to couples I guess, but I'm at a loss to understand it for singles. Anyone know why this is? so many so called str8 guys on here are bi but hide behind a str8 sexuality so they get to meet single ladies and couples i have seen the names of dozens of guys who have asked to meet and fuck me on the veri list of couples who have "no bi men" it makes me laugh to know they have been conned,,,
So many bi guys lie to get a fuck eh. Perhaps that's what puts some people off."if you're worried about sleeping a liar, sounds like it's people saying they are straight one needs to worry about | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I half get that ... But there is very few other areas that are publically aired. I also think there is something to explore why it is such a big turn off. I'm struggling to empathise with any other examples that aren't illegal. What's to explore about it? I was seeing someone that asked me if I had ever done anything with another guy and I said no because I hadn't and she said thank got for that because it would kill the passion. She has gay and bi friends so it's not a homophobic thing, it really is just a preference. Playing devil's advocate..a couple of questions. Had you already slept together and if so how would you have felt if after a dozen or so shags after which she seems more than happy with you and your ongoing sexual activities.... she asks that question and you say yes. At which point she ends things. Despite the fact that all was fine before the question was asked, you're still the same person you were when you were sleeping together - nothings changed bar the answer to one question. Does anyone think that doesn't display some form of prejudice? Ignorance in that case would have been bliss. A 'no', despite being a fib, would have likely meant a continuation of sex. A" No she asked me before we met as we talked a lot to get to know each other and if she had have waited to ask and I had have slept with guys then I'd just have to accept her choices because it's her body and mind. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think they're worried about numbers for catering, in case it's bi one, get one free. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I half get that ... But there is very few other areas that are publically aired. I also think there is something to explore why it is such a big turn off. I'm struggling to empathise with any other examples that aren't illegal. What's to explore about it? I was seeing someone that asked me if I had ever done anything with another guy and I said no because I hadn't and she said thank got for that because it would kill the passion. She has gay and bi friends so it's not a homophobic thing, it really is just a preference. I've been asked that question. I have never been asked about any other passion killers. Maybe it's because being bi is more prevalent than sc@t (my biggest turn off), but noone has ever said to me that doing xyz in my past is a deal breaker. Other than my sexuality. That's the bit I struggle with. It seems to be treated inconsistently with other things. " It's no difference to people having other preferences when it comes to a sexual partner, it's not the end of the world because someone doesn't find you attractive because of something you have, don't have, do or have done in the past. Nobody owes anyone a explanation for their preferences and nobody should feel bad because of them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I half get that ... But there is very few other areas that are publically aired. I also think there is something to explore why it is such a big turn off. I'm struggling to empathise with any other examples that aren't illegal. What's to explore about it? I was seeing someone that asked me if I had ever done anything with another guy and I said no because I hadn't and she said thank got for that because it would kill the passion. She has gay and bi friends so it's not a homophobic thing, it really is just a preference. I've been asked that question. I have never been asked about any other passion killers. Maybe it's because being bi is more prevalent than sc@t (my biggest turn off), but noone has ever said to me that doing xyz in my past is a deal breaker. Other than my sexuality. That's the bit I struggle with. It seems to be treated inconsistently with other things. It's no difference to people having other preferences when it comes to a sexual partner, it's not the end of the world because someone doesn't find you attractive because of something you have, don't have, do or have done in the past. Nobody owes anyone a explanation for their preferences and nobody should feel bad because of them" I beg to differ. Preferences are the public cloak that prejudices and bigotry hides under. No, no one owes anyone an explanation, except for themselves and being honest about their reasons. There are no ‘just because’ reasons, there are no ‘it’s just a preference’. Those preferences are always based in something. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I half get that ... But there is very few other areas that are publically aired. I also think there is something to explore why it is such a big turn off. I'm struggling to empathise with any other examples that aren't illegal. What's to explore about it? I was seeing someone that asked me if I had ever done anything with another guy and I said no because I hadn't and she said thank got for that because it would kill the passion. She has gay and bi friends so it's not a homophobic thing, it really is just a preference. I've been asked that question. I have never been asked about any other passion killers. Maybe it's because being bi is more prevalent than sc@t (my biggest turn off), but noone has ever said to me that doing xyz in my past is a deal breaker. Other than my sexuality. That's the bit I struggle with. It seems to be treated inconsistently with other things. It's no difference to people having other preferences when it comes to a sexual partner, it's not the end of the world because someone doesn't find you attractive because of something you have, don't have, do or have done in the past. Nobody owes anyone a explanation for their preferences and nobody should feel bad because of them I beg to differ. Preferences are the public cloak that prejudices and bigotry hides under. No, no one owes anyone an explanation, except for themselves and being honest about their reasons. There are no ‘just because’ reasons, there are no ‘it’s just a preference’. Those preferences are always based in something. " Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Like most people on fab I am here to explore my fantasies and for the record bi guys never feature in them. I want to feel confident that they are driven mad with lust for me. Not my husband. Therefore I prefer straight guys. Funny though I seem to share an open preference for straight guys with so many bi guys on fab. Which is a bit odd really as nobody criticises them for their preference!" That certainly seems to make sense as a reason | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I half get that ... But there is very few other areas that are publically aired. I also think there is something to explore why it is such a big turn off. I'm struggling to empathise with any other examples that aren't illegal. What's to explore about it? I was seeing someone that asked me if I had ever done anything with another guy and I said no because I hadn't and she said thank got for that because it would kill the passion. She has gay and bi friends so it's not a homophobic thing, it really is just a preference. I've been asked that question. I have never been asked about any other passion killers. Maybe it's because being bi is more prevalent than sc@t (my biggest turn off), but noone has ever said to me that doing xyz in my past is a deal breaker. Other than my sexuality. That's the bit I struggle with. It seems to be treated inconsistently with other things. It's no difference to people having other preferences when it comes to a sexual partner, it's not the end of the world because someone doesn't find you attractive because of something you have, don't have, do or have done in the past. Nobody owes anyone a explanation for their preferences and nobody should feel bad because of them" I'm not demanding an explanation. Nor aying they should feel bad. I would say it is worth refelction why this preference has this effect and not others. It's a difficult subject because it's an individual right to sexual preference whatever their reasons versus wider conversation about prejudice against bisexuality (or male on male sexuality). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I half get that ... But there is very few other areas that are publically aired. I also think there is something to explore why it is such a big turn off. I'm struggling to empathise with any other examples that aren't illegal. What's to explore about it? I was seeing someone that asked me if I had ever done anything with another guy and I said no because I hadn't and she said thank got for that because it would kill the passion. She has gay and bi friends so it's not a homophobic thing, it really is just a preference. I've been asked that question. I have never been asked about any other passion killers. Maybe it's because being bi is more prevalent than sc@t (my biggest turn off), but noone has ever said to me that doing xyz in my past is a deal breaker. Other than my sexuality. That's the bit I struggle with. It seems to be treated inconsistently with other things. It's no difference to people having other preferences when it comes to a sexual partner, it's not the end of the world because someone doesn't find you attractive because of something you have, don't have, do or have done in the past. Nobody owes anyone a explanation for their preferences and nobody should feel bad because of them I beg to differ. Preferences are the public cloak that prejudices and bigotry hides under. No, no one owes anyone an explanation, except for themselves and being honest about their reasons. There are no ‘just because’ reasons, there are no ‘it’s just a preference’. Those preferences are always based in something. Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? " Sure, knock yourself out | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's really simple, some people get turned off by the thought of a guy being with another guy so if they know someone has done it in the past it kills the attraction I half get that ... But there is very few other areas that are publically aired. I also think there is something to explore why it is such a big turn off. I'm struggling to empathise with any other examples that aren't illegal. What's to explore about it? I was seeing someone that asked me if I had ever done anything with another guy and I said no because I hadn't and she said thank got for that because it would kill the passion. She has gay and bi friends so it's not a homophobic thing, it really is just a preference. I've been asked that question. I have never been asked about any other passion killers. Maybe it's because being bi is more prevalent than sc@t (my biggest turn off), but noone has ever said to me that doing xyz in my past is a deal breaker. Other than my sexuality. That's the bit I struggle with. It seems to be treated inconsistently with other things. It's no difference to people having other preferences when it comes to a sexual partner, it's not the end of the world because someone doesn't find you attractive because of something you have, don't have, do or have done in the past. Nobody owes anyone a explanation for their preferences and nobody should feel bad because of them I beg to differ. Preferences are the public cloak that prejudices and bigotry hides under. No, no one owes anyone an explanation, except for themselves and being honest about their reasons. There are no ‘just because’ reasons, there are no ‘it’s just a preference’. Those preferences are always based in something. Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? Sure, knock yourself out" It's not worth my time, same as it's not worth people questioning why someone won't meet them because they're bi. If you aren't someones cup of tea, you just aren't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? " Gay people only want to meet gay people if they only like gay sex. What a lot of posters here have been talking about is a woman who likes sex with men, not wanting to meet a man for 1 on 1 hetero sex, because in the past he's had some kind of sex with another man. The two examples are not the same. Gbat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We play maybe 2/3 times a year and do not want to risk awkward moments at that time. And Yes some bi guy do push their luck like men trying to slip their condoms off women making holes in condoms to get pregnant and single touching when not invited so eliminated risk by not meeting the risk! Some people are just chances regardless of gender! " I hate condoms without a hole in them. Always impossible to get your cock in… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? Gay people only want to meet gay people if they only like gay sex. What a lot of posters here have been talking about is a woman who likes sex with men, not wanting to meet a man for 1 on 1 hetero sex, because in the past he's had some kind of sex with another man. The two examples are not the same. Gbat " How do you know that’s the woman’s reason? You’re just assuming that’s the reason. That’s not my reason for preferring straight guys. People should stop assuming and calling people names where it’s uncalled for. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? Gay people only want to meet gay people if they only like gay sex. What a lot of posters here have been talking about is a woman who likes sex with men, not wanting to meet a man for 1 on 1 hetero sex, because in the past he's had some kind of sex with another man. The two examples are not the same. Gbat How do you know that’s the woman’s reason? You’re just assuming that’s the reason. That’s not my reason for preferring straight guys. People should stop assuming and calling people names where it’s uncalled for. " are you able share why Nora ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? Gay people only want to meet gay people if they only like gay sex. What a lot of posters here have been talking about is a woman who likes sex with men, not wanting to meet a man for 1 on 1 hetero sex, because in the past he's had some kind of sex with another man. The two examples are not the same. Gbat How do you know that’s the woman’s reason? You’re just assuming that’s the reason. That’s not my reason for preferring straight guys. People should stop assuming and calling people names where it’s uncalled for. are you able share why Nora ?" No | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? Gay people only want to meet gay people if they only like gay sex. What a lot of posters here have been talking about is a woman who likes sex with men, not wanting to meet a man for 1 on 1 hetero sex, because in the past he's had some kind of sex with another man. The two examples are not the same. Gbat " 100 of things put women of sex! It's just one more thing people should just accept that some people don't like certain things people put off people with multiple reviews for instance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? Gay people only want to meet gay people if they only like gay sex. What a lot of posters here have been talking about is a woman who likes sex with men, not wanting to meet a man for 1 on 1 hetero sex, because in the past he's had some kind of sex with another man. The two examples are not the same. Gbat " I'm talking about bi people not wanting to meet straight, it's exactly the same but flipping the coin | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 
A
*I didn't actually thank God either. There is no God. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? Gay people only want to meet gay people if they only like gay sex. What a lot of posters here have been talking about is a woman who likes sex with men, not wanting to meet a man for 1 on 1 hetero sex, because in the past he's had some kind of sex with another man. The two examples are not the same. Gbat How do you know that’s the woman’s reason? You’re just assuming that’s the reason. That’s not my reason for preferring straight guys. People should stop assuming and calling people names where it’s uncalled for. " Power to Nora.. She does not need to explain her preferences.. Leave her alone.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? Gay people only want to meet gay people if they only like gay sex. What a lot of posters here have been talking about is a woman who likes sex with men, not wanting to meet a man for 1 on 1 hetero sex, because in the past he's had some kind of sex with another man. The two examples are not the same. Gbat I'm talking about bi people not wanting to meet straight, it's exactly the same but flipping the coin " is that a thing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I once commented on the forums that I'd never fuck a Tory. I was lambasted left right and centre for being intolerant. Thanks God I didn't say a bi Tory....
A
*I didn't actually thank God either. There is no God."Fuck a Lib Dem, they swing every bloody way! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse?" What if it's been up a woman's? 
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? Gay people only want to meet gay people if they only like gay sex. What a lot of posters here have been talking about is a woman who likes sex with men, not wanting to meet a man for 1 on 1 hetero sex, because in the past he's had some kind of sex with another man. The two examples are not the same. Gbat How do you know that’s the woman’s reason? You’re just assuming that’s the reason. That’s not my reason for preferring straight guys. People should stop assuming and calling people names where it’s uncalled for. are you able share why Nora ? No " okay, no worries. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? What if it's been up a woman's?
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A"Maybe they don’t wanna suck that either? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? Gay people only want to meet gay people if they only like gay sex. What a lot of posters here have been talking about is a woman who likes sex with men, not wanting to meet a man for 1 on 1 hetero sex, because in the past he's had some kind of sex with another man. The two examples are not the same. Gbat How do you know that’s the woman’s reason? You’re just assuming that’s the reason. That’s not my reason for preferring straight guys. People should stop assuming and calling people names where it’s uncalled for. Power to Nora.. She does not need to explain her preferences.. Leave her alone.. " . I don’t need leaving alone Tom. I couldn’t care less what people think about what I do and don’t do. I just get annoyed with people on their high horses throwing labels about thinking they know how people think. Not just on this subject. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should I have an issue with people not wanting to meet straight people then? Gay people only want to meet gay people if they only like gay sex. What a lot of posters here have been talking about is a woman who likes sex with men, not wanting to meet a man for 1 on 1 hetero sex, because in the past he's had some kind of sex with another man. The two examples are not the same. Gbat I'm talking about bi people not wanting to meet straight, it's exactly the same but flipping the coin is that a thing? " Yes it is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? What if it's been up a woman's?
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A
Maybe they don’t wanna suck that either?"Maybe not. I've never heard of anyone asking a potential play partner whether they've ever had anal sex with a man or woman though. Do people have pre-populated tick lists and surveys of activities they'd like to check if others have indulged in that they use as a pre-meet screening process? Don't think I've ever been asked any question about previous partners/activities, but maybe others adopt a different system. I'd run a mile if I had to fill out a survey before a meet.....
A | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? What if it's been up a woman's?
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A
Maybe they don’t wanna suck that either?"to me I kinda get that if thwy did have an odd ick here. But nobody has ever asked me if I've ever done anal because they find the idea kills their attraction. And bisexuality doesnt mean my dick has been an any guys ass. It appears the idea I may like something has the ick factor. Not what I have done. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse?" Do bi guys not wash their cocks? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? What if it's been up a woman's?
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A
Maybe they don’t wanna suck that either? to me I kinda get that if thwy did have an odd ick here. But nobody has ever asked me if I've ever done anal because they find the idea kills their attraction. And bisexuality doesnt mean my dick has been an any guys ass.
It appears the idea I may like something has the ick factor. Not what I have done.
"That’s fine though is it not? If someone had had loads of gangbangs that would me give me the ick and I wouldn’t meet them. Even though it wouldn’t affect a one to one meet as such. If someone was heavily into BDSM and I knew they’d done certain things I wouldn’t meet them. Is that wrong in your eyes then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? Do bi guys not wash their cocks? " Only if they’re cut. Uncut cocks are filthy according to fab | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm talking about bi people not wanting to meet straight, it's exactly the same but flipping the coin " If bi people want to meet anyone for bi sex, there's no point in meeting straight people. If bi people want to meet anyone for straight sex, I'm sure they'll meet straight people. Again, I don't think you're comparing like for like. Nora (The Explorer) I wasn't saying this was the case with all women, just the example that people above have used. Gbat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? Do bi guys not wash their cocks? Only if they’re cut. Uncut cocks are filthy according to fab " dirty hooded penises! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm talking about bi people not wanting to meet straight, it's exactly the same but flipping the coin If bi people want to meet anyone for bi sex, there's no point in meeting straight people. If bi people want to meet anyone for straight sex, I'm sure they'll meet straight people. Again, I don't think you're comparing like for like. Nora (The Explorer) I wasn't saying this was the case with all women, just the example that people above have used. Gbat " I'm saying they have a preference, preference is a choice no matter what it is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There’s no way you could have looked through enough profiles to make any sort of meaningful determination on this. Besides, people have their preferences, so just find the ones for whom you are their target demographic." I do agree with this. I’ve never got why people worry about the ones who aren’t for them anyway. I was gutted when someone I fancied mentioned he prefers small boobs once. But I moved on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There’s no way you could have looked through enough profiles to make any sort of meaningful determination on this. Besides, people have their preferences, so just find the ones for whom you are their target demographic. I do agree with this. I’ve never got why people worry about the ones who aren’t for them anyway. I was gutted when someone I fancied mentioned he prefers small boobs once. But I moved on "No way Shame on them and their preferences Nora | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? What if it's been up a woman's?
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A
Maybe they don’t wanna suck that either? to me I kinda get that if thwy did have an odd ick here. But nobody has ever asked me if I've ever done anal because they find the idea kills their attraction. And bisexuality doesnt mean my dick has been an any guys ass.
It appears the idea I may like something has the ick factor. Not what I have done.
That’s fine though is it not? If someone had had loads of gangbangs that would me give me the ick and I wouldn’t meet them. Even though it wouldn’t affect a one to one meet as such. If someone was heavily into BDSM and I knew they’d done certain things I wouldn’t meet them. Is that wrong in your eyes then?"for me there are three angles One is the preferring to meet someone who hasn't done some stuff. I've said earlier, I do kinda get that Two is preferring not to meet someone who may have done some stuff is different to not meeting someone who may have an unexpressed preference. Does it make a difference if a guy has acted on his desires or not? Three is the fact that it is largely only bisexuality that is offered up on a holistic scale. And in such an upfront way. I've never seen "no gangabangers" or "no BDSMers". There is imo still prejudices about bisexual men (while Im ignroing Tom's comment as a wind up, it's not the first time I've heard that comment). I've heard people say that bisexuals are gays in denial. That last point is why it's useful to have such discussions. It's also why many respond the way they do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Going to make a blanket statement without reliable evidence so anyone who dislikes such things should probably scroll past this post.....however I think it's because single women might not want to have a disappointing time with a guy who can't get it up for them unless there's some penis around, so to ensure they get a hard dick to ride they go for straights only. I guess it's a bit like when I am only looking for men who want to fuck me, I would not be asking for versatile or bottom men. " There's some wisdom | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There’s no way you could have looked through enough profiles to make any sort of meaningful determination on this. Besides, people have their preferences, so just find the ones for whom you are their target demographic. I do agree with this. I’ve never got why people worry about the ones who aren’t for them anyway. I was gutted when someone I fancied mentioned he prefers small boobs once. But I moved on
No way Shame on them and their preferences Nora "Boob prejudice I tell ya! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? Do bi guys not wash their cocks? " Maybe they don’t wanna do if even if they’ve washed it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? What if it's been up a woman's?
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A
Maybe they don’t wanna suck that either? to me I kinda get that if thwy did have an odd ick here. But nobody has ever asked me if I've ever done anal because they find the idea kills their attraction. And bisexuality doesnt mean my dick has been an any guys ass.
It appears the idea I may like something has the ick factor. Not what I have done.
That’s fine though is it not? If someone had had loads of gangbangs that would me give me the ick and I wouldn’t meet them. Even though it wouldn’t affect a one to one meet as such. If someone was heavily into BDSM and I knew they’d done certain things I wouldn’t meet them. Is that wrong in your eyes then?for me there are three angles
One is the preferring to meet someone who hasn't done some stuff. I've said earlier, I do kinda get that
Two is preferring not to meet someone who may have done some stuff is different to not meeting someone who may have an unexpressed preference. Does it make a difference if a guy has acted on his desires or not?
Three is the fact that it is largely only bisexuality that is offered up on a holistic scale. And in such an upfront way. I've never seen "no gangabangers" or "no BDSMers".
There is imo still prejudices about bisexual men (while Im ignroing Tom's comment as a wind up, it's not the first time I've heard that comment). I've heard people say that bisexuals are gays in denial.
That last point is why it's useful to have such discussions. It's also why many respond the way they do.
"Fair enough. Although to be honest anyone who puts no “this”’”that”‘or “the other” on their profile puts me off anyway. I know what I like and don’t like and I don’t feel the need to plaster it on my profile or tell people why I don’t want to meet them. A no thanks has always been sufficient for me. Both ways. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm saying they have a preference, preference is a choice no matter what it is" I would refer you to my earlier comment. I said something along the lines of no one owes an explanation, but if they are willing to give one, I'd love to hear it. Everyone makes a choice, that's a good thing. People should only do what they want to do, with who they want to do it with, when and where it's appropriate for them to do it. But as this is a discussion forum on a swinger's site, I was hoping that some people would explain their "preference". Some people have explained that the thought of two men together is repulsive to them, to the extent that it would kill any sexual mood they had. That's how they feel so let them get on with their lives I guess. I'd still like to understand why they are so repulsed though. There's quite a few things I'm not that keen on and I'm happy to say what it is I'm looking for. But I think excluding whole swathes of the population is maybe not the best way forward. Not the way forward for me anyway. Gbat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? What if it's been up a woman's?
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A
Maybe they don’t wanna suck that either? to me I kinda get that if thwy did have an odd ick here. But nobody has ever asked me if I've ever done anal because they find the idea kills their attraction. And bisexuality doesnt mean my dick has been an any guys ass.
It appears the idea I may like something has the ick factor. Not what I have done.
That’s fine though is it not? If someone had had loads of gangbangs that would me give me the ick and I wouldn’t meet them. Even though it wouldn’t affect a one to one meet as such. If someone was heavily into BDSM and I knew they’d done certain things I wouldn’t meet them. Is that wrong in your eyes then?for me there are three angles
One is the preferring to meet someone who hasn't done some stuff. I've said earlier, I do kinda get that
Two is preferring not to meet someone who may have done some stuff is different to not meeting someone who may have an unexpressed preference. Does it make a difference if a guy has acted on his desires or not?
Three is the fact that it is largely only bisexuality that is offered up on a holistic scale. And in such an upfront way. I've never seen "no gangabangers" or "no BDSMers".
There is imo still prejudices about bisexual men (while Im ignroing Tom's comment as a wind up, it's not the first time I've heard that comment). I've heard people say that bisexuals are gays in denial.
That last point is why it's useful to have such discussions. It's also why many respond the way they do.
Fair enough. Although to be honest anyone who puts no “this”’”that”‘or “the other” on their profile puts me off anyway. I know what I like and don’t like and I don’t feel the need to plaster it on my profile or tell people why I don’t want to meet them. A no thanks has always been sufficient for me. Both ways. "agreed on that. (Although gawd knows if I'm hypocritical on this lol) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too much competition if he's gonna run off with all the sexy men aswell as the sexy women. May aswell give it up now "That’s part of the reason I prefer straight men to be honest. I don’t share men so if he’s bi I can’t satisfy that side at all hence I prefer straight. I get this is predominantly a swingers site though so not many are going to think like me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There’s no way you could have looked through enough profiles to make any sort of meaningful determination on this. Besides, people have their preferences, so just find the ones for whom you are their target demographic. I do agree with this. I’ve never got why people worry about the ones who aren’t for them anyway. I was gutted when someone I fancied mentioned he prefers small boobs once. But I moved on
No way Shame on them and their preferences Nora
Boob prejudice I tell ya!"#allboobsmatter | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too much competition if he's gonna run off with all the sexy men aswell as the sexy women. May aswell give it up now
That’s part of the reason I prefer straight men to be honest. I don’t share men so if he’s bi I can’t satisfy that side at all hence I prefer straight. I get this is predominantly a swingers site though so not many are going to think like me. "I also wouldn’t be interested in a bi mmf at all. Bi ffm I’m quite happy with though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I'd still like to understand why they are so repulsed though. There's quite a few things I'm not that keen on and I'm happy to say what it is I'm looking for. But I think excluding whole swathes of the population is maybe not the best way forward. Not the way forward for me anyway. Gbat " You’re expending too much energy on trying to get an explanation that probably won’t satisfy you in the long run. If they don’t want to meet bi guys, that’s an open and shut case for a bi dude; simply move on to folks open to meeting bi men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm saying they have a preference, preference is a choice no matter what it is I would refer you to my earlier comment. I said something along the lines of no one owes an explanation, but if they are willing to give one, I'd love to hear it. Everyone makes a choice, that's a good thing. People should only do what they want to do, with who they want to do it with, when and where it's appropriate for them to do it. But as this is a discussion forum on a swinger's site, I was hoping that some people would explain their "preference". Some people have explained that the thought of two men together is repulsive to them, to the extent that it would kill any sexual mood they had. That's how they feel so let them get on with their lives I guess. I'd still like to understand why they are so repulsed though. There's quite a few things I'm not that keen on and I'm happy to say what it is I'm looking for. But I think excluding whole swathes of the population is maybe not the best way forward. Not the way forward for me anyway. Gbat " Could be a million and one things, upbringing, religion, past abuse, past bad experiences. Im sure we are allowed to be as prejudiced as we like as long as we arent pushing that prejudice onto anyone else and affecting them. By simply saying no thanks hurts no-one but lets people live as they want. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There’s no way you could have looked through enough profiles to make any sort of meaningful determination on this. Besides, people have their preferences, so just find the ones for whom you are their target demographic. I do agree with this. I’ve never got why people worry about the ones who aren’t for them anyway. I was gutted when someone I fancied mentioned he prefers small boobs once. But I moved on
No way Shame on them and their preferences Nora
Boob prejudice I tell ya!"Get all the big boobs together and do a strike Nora, make sure all have boobs out though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There’s no way you could have looked through enough profiles to make any sort of meaningful determination on this. Besides, people have their preferences, so just find the ones for whom you are their target demographic. I do agree with this. I’ve never got why people worry about the ones who aren’t for them anyway. I was gutted when someone I fancied mentioned he prefers small boobs once. But I moved on
No way Shame on them and their preferences Nora
Boob prejudice I tell ya!
Get all the big boobs together and do a strike Nora, make sure all have boobs out though ""what do we want...? " when do we want them? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There’s no way you could have looked through enough profiles to make any sort of meaningful determination on this. Besides, people have their preferences, so just find the ones for whom you are their target demographic. I do agree with this. I’ve never got why people worry about the ones who aren’t for them anyway. I was gutted when someone I fancied mentioned he prefers small boobs once. But I moved on
No way Shame on them and their preferences Nora
Boob prejudice I tell ya!
Get all the big boobs together and do a strike Nora, make sure all have boobs out though "I was also gutted when this bloke I fancied wouldn’t let me tie him up I haven’t moved on though yet as I think he could be worked on… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm saying they have a preference, preference is a choice no matter what it is I would refer you to my earlier comment. I said something along the lines of no one owes an explanation, but if they are willing to give one, I'd love to hear it. Everyone makes a choice, that's a good thing. People should only do what they want to do, with who they want to do it with, when and where it's appropriate for them to do it. But as this is a discussion forum on a swinger's site, I was hoping that some people would explain their "preference". Some people have explained that the thought of two men together is repulsive to them, to the extent that it would kill any sexual mood they had. That's how they feel so let them get on with their lives I guess. I'd still like to understand why they are so repulsed though. There's quite a few things I'm not that keen on and I'm happy to say what it is I'm looking for. But I think excluding whole swathes of the population is maybe not the best way forward. Not the way forward for me anyway. Gbat " I don't understand why some people like marmite and others don't and neither do they, it's just the way life is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There’s no way you could have looked through enough profiles to make any sort of meaningful determination on this. Besides, people have their preferences, so just find the ones for whom you are their target demographic. I do agree with this. I’ve never got why people worry about the ones who aren’t for them anyway. I was gutted when someone I fancied mentioned he prefers small boobs once. But I moved on
No way Shame on them and their preferences Nora
Boob prejudice I tell ya!
Get all the big boobs together and do a strike Nora, make sure all have boobs out though
I was also gutted when this bloke I fancied wouldn’t let me tie him up I haven’t moved on though yet as I think he could be worked on…"I know him well and it's always going to be a NO!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There’s no way you could have looked through enough profiles to make any sort of meaningful determination on this. Besides, people have their preferences, so just find the ones for whom you are their target demographic. I do agree with this. I’ve never got why people worry about the ones who aren’t for them anyway. I was gutted when someone I fancied mentioned he prefers small boobs once. But I moved on
No way Shame on them and their preferences Nora
Boob prejudice I tell ya!
Get all the big boobs together and do a strike Nora, make sure all have boobs out though
I was also gutted when this bloke I fancied wouldn’t let me tie him up I haven’t moved on though yet as I think he could be worked on…
I know him well and it's always going to be a NO!! "  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too much competition if he's gonna run off with all the sexy men aswell as the sexy women. May aswell give it up now
That’s part of the reason I prefer straight men to be honest. I don’t share men so if he’s bi I can’t satisfy that side at all hence I prefer straight. I get this is predominantly a swingers site though so not many are going to think like me.
I also wouldn’t be interested in a bi mmf at all. Bi ffm I’m quite happy with though. "Id be too tempted in an mmf to just sit back and watch it become an mm, get my pad and pen out in the blowjob bit and take notes  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I'd still like to understand why they are so repulsed though. There's quite a few things I'm not that keen on and I'm happy to say what it is I'm looking for. But I think excluding whole swathes of the population is maybe not the best way forward. Not the way forward for me anyway. Gbat You’re expending too much energy on trying to get an explanation that probably won’t satisfy you in the long run. If they don’t want to meet bi guys, that’s an open and shut case for a bi dude; simply move on to folks open to meeting bi men. " Exactly this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too much competition if he's gonna run off with all the sexy men aswell as the sexy women. May aswell give it up now
That’s part of the reason I prefer straight men to be honest. I don’t share men so if he’s bi I can’t satisfy that side at all hence I prefer straight. I get this is predominantly a swingers site though so not many are going to think like me.
I also wouldn’t be interested in a bi mmf at all. Bi ffm I’m quite happy with though.
Id be too tempted in an mmf to just sit back and watch it become an mm, get my pad and pen out in the blowjob bit and take notes " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? What if it's been up a woman's?
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A
Maybe they don’t wanna suck that either? to me I kinda get that if thwy did have an odd ick here. But nobody has ever asked me if I've ever done anal because they find the idea kills their attraction. And bisexuality doesnt mean my dick has been an any guys ass.
It appears the idea I may like something has the ick factor. Not what I have done.
That’s fine though is it not? If someone had had loads of gangbangs that would me give me the ick and I wouldn’t meet them. Even though it wouldn’t affect a one to one meet as such. If someone was heavily into BDSM and I knew they’d done certain things I wouldn’t meet them. Is that wrong in your eyes then?"Not meeting someone because there are in BDSM is a preference not a prejudiced. As for not meeting someone that has taken part in a gangbang I am not what the issue is with that, would you explain what the issue is? Dose it make a difference if the bi guy is bottom or a top ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? What if it's been up a woman's?
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A
Maybe they don’t wanna suck that either? to me I kinda get that if thwy did have an odd ick here. But nobody has ever asked me if I've ever done anal because they find the idea kills their attraction. And bisexuality doesnt mean my dick has been an any guys ass.
It appears the idea I may like something has the ick factor. Not what I have done.
That’s fine though is it not? If someone had had loads of gangbangs that would me give me the ick and I wouldn’t meet them. Even though it wouldn’t affect a one to one meet as such. If someone was heavily into BDSM and I knew they’d done certain things I wouldn’t meet them. Is that wrong in your eyes then?
Not meeting someone because there are in BDSM is a preference not a prejudiced. As for not meeting someone that has taken part in a gangbang I am not what the issue is with that, would you explain what the issue is?
Dose it make a difference if the bi guy is bottom or a top ? "The issue is I wouldn’t want to meet someone who takes part in gangbangs. Nothing to do with bi or not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? What if it's been up a woman's?
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A
Maybe they don’t wanna suck that either? to me I kinda get that if thwy did have an odd ick here. But nobody has ever asked me if I've ever done anal because they find the idea kills their attraction. And bisexuality doesnt mean my dick has been an any guys ass.
It appears the idea I may like something has the ick factor. Not what I have done.
That’s fine though is it not? If someone had had loads of gangbangs that would me give me the ick and I wouldn’t meet them. Even though it wouldn’t affect a one to one meet as such. If someone was heavily into BDSM and I knew they’d done certain things I wouldn’t meet them. Is that wrong in your eyes then?
Not meeting someone because there are in BDSM is a preference not a prejudiced. As for not meeting someone that has taken part in a gangbang I am not what the issue is with that, would you explain what the issue is?
Dose it make a difference if the bi guy is bottom or a top ?
The issue is I wouldn’t want to meet someone who takes part in gangbangs. Nothing to do with bi or not. "You are rightly entitled to your preferences as is everyone else. But saying that you will not meet someone who purely based on that they have taken part in a gangbang or is bi is prejudiced. Also you didn't answer if it makes a difference on top or bottom | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? What if it's been up a woman's?
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A
Maybe they don’t wanna suck that either? to me I kinda get that if thwy did have an odd ick here. But nobody has ever asked me if I've ever done anal because they find the idea kills their attraction. And bisexuality doesnt mean my dick has been an any guys ass.
It appears the idea I may like something has the ick factor. Not what I have done.
That’s fine though is it not? If someone had had loads of gangbangs that would me give me the ick and I wouldn’t meet them. Even though it wouldn’t affect a one to one meet as such. If someone was heavily into BDSM and I knew they’d done certain things I wouldn’t meet them. Is that wrong in your eyes then?
Not meeting someone because there are in BDSM is a preference not a prejudiced. As for not meeting someone that has taken part in a gangbang I am not what the issue is with that, would you explain what the issue is?
Dose it make a difference if the bi guy is bottom or a top ?
The issue is I wouldn’t want to meet someone who takes part in gangbangs. Nothing to do with bi or not.
You are rightly entitled to your preferences as is everyone else.
But saying that you will not meet someone who purely based on that they have taken part in a gangbang or is bi is prejudiced.
Also you didn't answer if it makes a difference on top or bottom "Makes no difference. If you read my comment again I said people who had taken part in loads of gangbangs. No I definitely wouldn’t meet them. And no it’s not prejudice! How the hell is it prejudice? This is just getting silly now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying? "This its tantamount to being homophobic by virtue of being straight Everyone has nuanced preferences and attractions. So long as they aren't harming anyone, it's nobody else's fucking business. The amount of judgemental, generalising psychics on here is hilarious.
I'm not a fan of anal play, does that make me prejudiced against bi guys?! Gtfooh | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too much competition if he's gonna run off with all the sexy men aswell as the sexy women. May aswell give it up now
That’s part of the reason I prefer straight men to be honest. I don’t share men so if he’s bi I can’t satisfy that side at all hence I prefer straight. I get this is predominantly a swingers site though so not many are going to think like me.
I also wouldn’t be interested in a bi mmf at all. Bi ffm I’m quite happy with though.
Id be too tempted in an mmf to just sit back and watch it become an mm, get my pad and pen out in the blowjob bit and take notes "Honestly that sounds great to me, I’d love to “put on a show” for a woman | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying?
This its tantamount to being homophobic by virtue of being straight Everyone has nuanced preferences and attractions. So long as they aren't harming anyone, it's nobody else's fucking business. The amount of judgemental, generalising psychics on here is hilarious.
I'm not a fan of anal play, does that make me prejudiced against bi guys?! Gtfooh "Only at weekends… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too much competition if he's gonna run off with all the sexy men aswell as the sexy women. May aswell give it up now
That’s part of the reason I prefer straight men to be honest. I don’t share men so if he’s bi I can’t satisfy that side at all hence I prefer straight. I get this is predominantly a swingers site though so not many are going to think like me.
I also wouldn’t be interested in a bi mmf at all. Bi ffm I’m quite happy with though.
Id be too tempted in an mmf to just sit back and watch it become an mm, get my pad and pen out in the blowjob bit and take notes
Honestly that sounds great to me, I’d love to “put on a show” for a woman "Shame Annie isn’t still here. That was her dream! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying?
This its tantamount to being homophobic by virtue of being straight Everyone has nuanced preferences and attractions. So long as they aren't harming anyone, it's nobody else's fucking business. The amount of judgemental, generalising psychics on here is hilarious.
I'm not a fan of anal play, does that make me prejudiced against bi guys?! Gtfooh "No person is more prejudiced than someone that's straight and nobody is more entitled to answers and judgemental than someone who isn't by the looks of it
What a time to be alive when people can't just accept preferences and just move on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying?
This its tantamount to being homophobic by virtue of being straight Everyone has nuanced preferences and attractions. So long as they aren't harming anyone, it's nobody else's fucking business. The amount of judgemental, generalising psychics on here is hilarious.
I'm not a fan of anal play, does that make me prejudiced against bi guys?! Gtfooh
No person is more prejudiced than someone that's straight and nobody is more entitled to answers and judgemental than someone who isn't by the looks of it
What a time to be alive when people can't just accept preferences and just move on"I’ve learnt on here that any reasons you may have for not meeting people won’t be accepted by some and you’ll be labelled as something. Unless you’re willing to fuck everyone and everything you’re not safe. And people wonder why people won’t give reasons . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too much competition if he's gonna run off with all the sexy men aswell as the sexy women. May aswell give it up now
That’s part of the reason I prefer straight men to be honest. I don’t share men so if he’s bi I can’t satisfy that side at all hence I prefer straight. I get this is predominantly a swingers site though so not many are going to think like me.
I also wouldn’t be interested in a bi mmf at all. Bi ffm I’m quite happy with though.
Id be too tempted in an mmf to just sit back and watch it become an mm, get my pad and pen out in the blowjob bit and take notes
Honestly that sounds great to me, I’d love to “put on a show” for a woman
Shame Annie isn’t still here. That was her dream! "Who’s Annie? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too much competition if he's gonna run off with all the sexy men aswell as the sexy women. May aswell give it up now
That’s part of the reason I prefer straight men to be honest. I don’t share men so if he’s bi I can’t satisfy that side at all hence I prefer straight. I get this is predominantly a swingers site though so not many are going to think like me.
I also wouldn’t be interested in a bi mmf at all. Bi ffm I’m quite happy with though.
Id be too tempted in an mmf to just sit back and watch it become an mm, get my pad and pen out in the blowjob bit and take notes
Honestly that sounds great to me, I’d love to “put on a show” for a woman
Shame Annie isn’t still here. That was her dream!
Who’s Annie?"Annie Wilkes. She was on and off here for years. Hasn’t been back for a while though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying?
This its tantamount to being homophobic by virtue of being straight Everyone has nuanced preferences and attractions. So long as they aren't harming anyone, it's nobody else's fucking business. The amount of judgemental, generalising psychics on here is hilarious.
I'm not a fan of anal play, does that make me prejudiced against bi guys?! Gtfooh
No person is more prejudiced than someone that's straight and nobody is more entitled to answers and judgemental than someone who isn't by the looks of it
What a time to be alive when people can't just accept preferences and just move on
I’ve learnt on here that any reasons you may have for not meeting people won’t be accepted by some and you’ll be labelled as something. Unless you’re willing to fuck everyone and everything you’re not safe. And people wonder why people won’t give reasons . "You'd just get questions on your reason for your reason | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too much competition if he's gonna run off with all the sexy men aswell as the sexy women. May aswell give it up now
That’s part of the reason I prefer straight men to be honest. I don’t share men so if he’s bi I can’t satisfy that side at all hence I prefer straight. I get this is predominantly a swingers site though so not many are going to think like me.
I also wouldn’t be interested in a bi mmf at all. Bi ffm I’m quite happy with though.
Id be too tempted in an mmf to just sit back and watch it become an mm, get my pad and pen out in the blowjob bit and take notes
Honestly that sounds great to me, I’d love to “put on a show” for a woman
Shame Annie isn’t still here. That was her dream!
Who’s Annie?
Annie Wilkes. She was on and off here for years. Hasn’t been back for a while though "Shame! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying?
This its tantamount to being homophobic by virtue of being straight Everyone has nuanced preferences and attractions. So long as they aren't harming anyone, it's nobody else's fucking business. The amount of judgemental, generalising psychics on here is hilarious.
I'm not a fan of anal play, does that make me prejudiced against bi guys?! Gtfooh
No person is more prejudiced than someone that's straight and nobody is more entitled to answers and judgemental than someone who isn't by the looks of it
What a time to be alive when people can't just accept preferences and just move on
I’ve learnt on here that any reasons you may have for not meeting people won’t be accepted by some and you’ll be labelled as something. Unless you’re willing to fuck everyone and everything you’re not safe. And people wonder why people won’t give reasons .
You'd just get questions on your reason for your reason "Oh god all the time! I used to sometimes if I was in the mood for a good debate. I just don’t have time these days. I don’t get involved in the serious threads so much anymore. Its only coz I’m bored in my sick bed that I’m here now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too much competition if he's gonna run off with all the sexy men aswell as the sexy women. May aswell give it up now
That’s part of the reason I prefer straight men to be honest. I don’t share men so if he’s bi I can’t satisfy that side at all hence I prefer straight. I get this is predominantly a swingers site though so not many are going to think like me.
I also wouldn’t be interested in a bi mmf at all. Bi ffm I’m quite happy with though.
Id be too tempted in an mmf to just sit back and watch it become an mm, get my pad and pen out in the blowjob bit and take notes
Honestly that sounds great to me, I’d love to “put on a show” for a woman
Shame Annie isn’t still here. That was her dream!
Who’s Annie?
Annie Wilkes. She was on and off here for years. Hasn’t been back for a while though "Shame, I'd have let her tongue my arse
Only because she was really nice to me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too much competition if he's gonna run off with all the sexy men aswell as the sexy women. May aswell give it up now
That’s part of the reason I prefer straight men to be honest. I don’t share men so if he’s bi I can’t satisfy that side at all hence I prefer straight. I get this is predominantly a swingers site though so not many are going to think like me.
I also wouldn’t be interested in a bi mmf at all. Bi ffm I’m quite happy with though.
Id be too tempted in an mmf to just sit back and watch it become an mm, get my pad and pen out in the blowjob bit and take notes
Honestly that sounds great to me, I’d love to “put on a show” for a woman
Shame Annie isn’t still here. That was her dream!
Who’s Annie?
Annie Wilkes. She was on and off here for years. Hasn’t been back for a while though
Shame, I'd have let her tongue my arse
Only because she was really nice to me "She loved an arsehole did our Annie | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying?
This its tantamount to being homophobic by virtue of being straight Everyone has nuanced preferences and attractions. So long as they aren't harming anyone, it's nobody else's fucking business. The amount of judgemental, generalising psychics on here is hilarious.
I'm not a fan of anal play, does that make me prejudiced against bi guys?! Gtfooh
No person is more prejudiced than someone that's straight and nobody is more entitled to answers and judgemental than someone who isn't by the looks of it
What a time to be alive when people can't just accept preferences and just move on
I’ve learnt on here that any reasons you may have for not meeting people won’t be accepted by some and you’ll be labelled as something. Unless you’re willing to fuck everyone and everything you’re not safe. And people wonder why people won’t give reasons .
You'd just get questions on your reason for your reason
Oh god all the time! I used to sometimes if I was in the mood for a good debate. I just don’t have time these days. I don’t get involved in the serious threads so much anymore. Its only coz I’m bored in my sick bed that I’m here now "Want me to send a video of me spreading my arse and stuffing it with chicken leg to cheer you up? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too much competition if he's gonna run off with all the sexy men aswell as the sexy women. May aswell give it up now
That’s part of the reason I prefer straight men to be honest. I don’t share men so if he’s bi I can’t satisfy that side at all hence I prefer straight. I get this is predominantly a swingers site though so not many are going to think like me.
I also wouldn’t be interested in a bi mmf at all. Bi ffm I’m quite happy with though.
Id be too tempted in an mmf to just sit back and watch it become an mm, get my pad and pen out in the blowjob bit and take notes
Honestly that sounds great to me, I’d love to “put on a show” for a woman
Shame Annie isn’t still here. That was her dream!
Who’s Annie?
Annie Wilkes. She was on and off here for years. Hasn’t been back for a while though
Shame, I'd have let her tongue my arse
Only because she was really nice to me
She loved an arsehole did our Annie "She had a nice one herself though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying?
This its tantamount to being homophobic by virtue of being straight Everyone has nuanced preferences and attractions. So long as they aren't harming anyone, it's nobody else's fucking business. The amount of judgemental, generalising psychics on here is hilarious.
I'm not a fan of anal play, does that make me prejudiced against bi guys?! Gtfooh
No person is more prejudiced than someone that's straight and nobody is more entitled to answers and judgemental than someone who isn't by the looks of it
What a time to be alive when people can't just accept preferences and just move on
I’ve learnt on here that any reasons you may have for not meeting people won’t be accepted by some and you’ll be labelled as something. Unless you’re willing to fuck everyone and everything you’re not safe. And people wonder why people won’t give reasons .
You'd just get questions on your reason for your reason
Oh god all the time! I used to sometimes if I was in the mood for a good debate. I just don’t have time these days. I don’t get involved in the serious threads so much anymore. Its only coz I’m bored in my sick bed that I’m here now
Want me to send a video of me spreading my arse and stuffing it with chicken leg to cheer you up? "No ta | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying?
This its tantamount to being homophobic by virtue of being straight Everyone has nuanced preferences and attractions. So long as they aren't harming anyone, it's nobody else's fucking business. The amount of judgemental, generalising psychics on here is hilarious.
I'm not a fan of anal play, does that make me prejudiced against bi guys?! Gtfooh
No person is more prejudiced than someone that's straight and nobody is more entitled to answers and judgemental than someone who isn't by the looks of it
What a time to be alive when people can't just accept preferences and just move on
I’ve learnt on here that any reasons you may have for not meeting people won’t be accepted by some and you’ll be labelled as something. Unless you’re willing to fuck everyone and everything you’re not safe. And people wonder why people won’t give reasons .
You'd just get questions on your reason for your reason
Oh god all the time! I used to sometimes if I was in the mood for a good debate. I just don’t have time these days. I don’t get involved in the serious threads so much anymore. Its only coz I’m bored in my sick bed that I’m here now
Want me to send a video of me spreading my arse and stuffing it with chicken leg to cheer you up?
No ta "Such a prejudice | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying?
This its tantamount to being homophobic by virtue of being straight Everyone has nuanced preferences and attractions. So long as they aren't harming anyone, it's nobody else's fucking business. The amount of judgemental, generalising psychics on here is hilarious.
I'm not a fan of anal play, does that make me prejudiced against bi guys?! Gtfooh
No person is more prejudiced than someone that's straight and nobody is more entitled to answers and judgemental than someone who isn't by the looks of it
What a time to be alive when people can't just accept preferences and just move on
I’ve learnt on here that any reasons you may have for not meeting people won’t be accepted by some and you’ll be labelled as something. Unless you’re willing to fuck everyone and everything you’re not safe. And people wonder why people won’t give reasons .
You'd just get questions on your reason for your reason
Oh god all the time! I used to sometimes if I was in the mood for a good debate. I just don’t have time these days. I don’t get involved in the serious threads so much anymore. Its only coz I’m bored in my sick bed that I’m here now
Want me to send a video of me spreading my arse and stuffing it with chicken leg to cheer you up?
No ta
Such a prejudice "Actually that’s another thing I’m prejudice about. Bumholes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why is it prejudice that the thought of two guys is a turn off? That’s fair enough but they wouldn’t be watching that. It would be one on one straight sex. It’s like refusing to meet someone because they ate marmite last year" To me its more like refusing to meet them because you looked at their verification list and something about if gave you the ick There are straight men I wouldn’t meet based on their verification list And attraction is often more than the physical look of someone | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying?
This its tantamount to being homophobic by virtue of being straight Everyone has nuanced preferences and attractions. So long as they aren't harming anyone, it's nobody else's fucking business. The amount of judgemental, generalising psychics on here is hilarious.
I'm not a fan of anal play, does that make me prejudiced against bi guys?! Gtfooh
No person is more prejudiced than someone that's straight and nobody is more entitled to answers and judgemental than someone who isn't by the looks of it
What a time to be alive when people can't just accept preferences and just move on
I’ve learnt on here that any reasons you may have for not meeting people won’t be accepted by some and you’ll be labelled as something. Unless you’re willing to fuck everyone and everything you’re not safe. And people wonder why people won’t give reasons .
You'd just get questions on your reason for your reason
Oh god all the time! I used to sometimes if I was in the mood for a good debate. I just don’t have time these days. I don’t get involved in the serious threads so much anymore. Its only coz I’m bored in my sick bed that I’m here now
Want me to send a video of me spreading my arse and stuffing it with chicken leg to cheer you up?
No ta
Such a prejudice
Actually that’s another thing I’m prejudice about. Bumholes. "I'm just picky on bumholes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
Are you saying you don't understand how someone can be turned off by even the thought of two men having sex? Sex starts in the mind.
You think everyone should find it sexy and if they don't they're prejudice? Or have psychological issues?
By that definition you're saying everyone should find everything sexy and if they don't there's something wrong with them.
You don't find what I do sexy so there must be something wrong with you...is that really what you're saying?
This its tantamount to being homophobic by virtue of being straight Everyone has nuanced preferences and attractions. So long as they aren't harming anyone, it's nobody else's fucking business. The amount of judgemental, generalising psychics on here is hilarious.
I'm not a fan of anal play, does that make me prejudiced against bi guys?! Gtfooh
No person is more prejudiced than someone that's straight and nobody is more entitled to answers and judgemental than someone who isn't by the looks of it
What a time to be alive when people can't just accept preferences and just move on
I’ve learnt on here that any reasons you may have for not meeting people won’t be accepted by some and you’ll be labelled as something. Unless you’re willing to fuck everyone and everything you’re not safe. And people wonder why people won’t give reasons .
You'd just get questions on your reason for your reason
Oh god all the time! I used to sometimes if I was in the mood for a good debate. I just don’t have time these days. I don’t get involved in the serious threads so much anymore. Its only coz I’m bored in my sick bed that I’m here now
Want me to send a video of me spreading my arse and stuffing it with chicken leg to cheer you up?
No ta
Such a prejudice
Actually that’s another thing I’m prejudice about. Bumholes.
I just like to pick bumholes "Ewww gross | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
^ Nailed it!
No, he hasn't.
It's a turn off for some.
It seems quite arrogant to assume everyone should find it appealing.
It should be neither appealing or unappealing as it bears no relevance on how they play with you unless you are prejudiced? "Think of this example … woman cheats on husband, husband didnt see it, its in the past, it wont have any relevance on their future sexual activity, but every time he closes his dues to liss her he sees it and is turned off The mind doesn’t work as black and white to separate things as you suggest and its not always related to prejudice Ps I’ve slept with bi guys… i can just see how it might not appeal to everyone | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe they just don’t wanna suck a cock that’s been up some blokes arse? What if it's been up a woman's?
So far as I'm aware, anatomically and functionally they're the same, give or take the odd prostrate......
A
Maybe they don’t wanna suck that either? to me I kinda get that if thwy did have an odd ick here. But nobody has ever asked me if I've ever done anal because they find the idea kills their attraction. And bisexuality doesnt mean my dick has been an any guys ass.
It appears the idea I may like something has the ick factor. Not what I have done.
That’s fine though is it not? If someone had had loads of gangbangs that would me give me the ick and I wouldn’t meet them. Even though it wouldn’t affect a one to one meet as such. If someone was heavily into BDSM and I knew they’d done certain things I wouldn’t meet them. Is that wrong in your eyes then?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
^ Nailed it!
No, he hasn't.
It's a turn off for some.
It seems quite arrogant to assume everyone should find it appealing.
It should be neither appealing or unappealing as it bears no relevance on how they play with you unless you are prejudiced?
Think of this example … woman cheats on husband, husband didnt see it, its in the past, it wont have any relevance on their future sexual activity, but every time he closes his dues to liss her he sees it and is turned off
The mind doesn’t work as black and white to separate things as you suggest and its not always related to prejudice
Ps I’ve slept with bi guys… i can just see how it might not appeal to everyone "Would it have been different if she had cheated on him with another woman ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
^ Nailed it!
No, he hasn't.
It's a turn off for some.
It seems quite arrogant to assume everyone should find it appealing.
It should be neither appealing or unappealing as it bears no relevance on how they play with you unless you are prejudiced?
Think of this example … woman cheats on husband, husband didnt see it, its in the past, it wont have any relevance on their future sexual activity, but every time he closes his dues to liss her he sees it and is turned off
The mind doesn’t work as black and white to separate things as you suggest and its not always related to prejudice
Ps I’ve slept with bi guys… i can just see how it might not appeal to everyone
Would it have been different if she had cheated on him with another woman ? "I have no idea since its a hypothetical example. The point wasn’t about man or woman anyway, it was so people might find an example of how something in the past can still be a turn off in the present that they could think about relating to I then read further and realised someone had already given the gang bang example | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
^ Nailed it!
No, he hasn't.
It's a turn off for some.
It seems quite arrogant to assume everyone should find it appealing.
It should be neither appealing or unappealing as it bears no relevance on how they play with you unless you are prejudiced?
Think of this example … woman cheats on husband, husband didnt see it, its in the past, it wont have any relevance on their future sexual activity, but every time he closes his dues to liss her he sees it and is turned off
The mind doesn’t work as black and white to separate things as you suggest and its not always related to prejudice
Ps I’ve slept with bi guys… i can just see how it might not appeal to everyone
Would it have been different if she had cheated on him with another woman ? "Cheating is cheating, makes zero difference | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sexual attraction and liking marmite are hardly comparable, unless you're really into marmite... Saying its psychological problems or prejudice..wtf .
Ok, how does my previous sexual partners bear relevance to a future one on one encounter?
The answer is; it doesn’t, unless it’s in their head, any negative association is based on prejudice
^ Nailed it!
No, he hasn't.
It's a turn off for some.
It seems quite arrogant to assume everyone should find it appealing.
It should be neither appealing or unappealing as it bears no relevance on how they play with you unless you are prejudiced?
Think of this example … woman cheats on husband, husband didnt see it, its in the past, it wont have any relevance on their future sexual activity, but every time he closes his dues to liss her he sees it and is turned off
The mind doesn’t work as black and white to separate things as you suggest and its not always related to prejudice
Ps I’ve slept with bi guys… i can just see how it might not appeal to everyone
Would it have been different if she had cheated on him with another woman ?
Cheating is cheating, makes zero difference "Again it wasn’t really about the cheating, it was just an example of how something occurring in the past doesn’t exclude it from being something you visualise and are turned off by in the present I got food poisoning once from fajitas and despite knowing they likely wont food poison me again im off them for life … that kind of thing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So looking through profiles and whatnot I see a fair few folks have a preference for straight guys. Entirely understandable when it comes to couples I guess, but I'm at a loss to understand it for singles. Anyone know why this is? " Just their personal preference I guess and while being bi or exploring bi sex is accepted and to some degree celebrate with woman. It’s still very Taboo when it comes to men. There still a strong societal stigma around it, with men that are open about being bi being treated as lesser, un-masculine or at times much worse. Society has a long way to go on this issue as it’s so heavily engrained. You have to remember, even in Victorian times, when showing your ankle was a thing, people thought nothing of female friends properly kissing as a term of endearment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because I'm homophobic and prejudiced against them. I don't want to fuck bi men because the thought totally turns me off. Now what?" Just out of curiosity.....(no pun intended)
How do people spot a single bi guy if out in a swinging club?
Assuming of course he's not got another guy hanging out of the back of him or he's noshing off all the cocks at the gloryholes?
Do people just assume someone is straight on a non bi night, or is it a question you ask (and assume you'll be given an honest answer of course) every time you decide you may want to have sex with someone?
Genuinely curious...(again , no pun intended )
A | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"How do people spot a single bi guy if out in a swinging club"" - piercings (right ear, tounge, eyebrow) - manicured nails - fingerless gloves - tattoo in intimate area - doesn't support a football team - orders malibu & cola - has an apple smart watch - beard - drives a Mazda convertible These are facetious answers, sorry | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
