 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Soon it will be against the law to put videos/pics on internet without consent listening to Dominic Raab yesterday...not sure how this will be moderated here. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself "
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person? "
Yeah i was thinking more of a single pringle really
I see so many photos and wonder about consent.. Esp those that look like they are taken in a non-fab world
I also wonder how many face pics etc are st*len from fb etc (oh i didn't know that was a bad fab word !) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person? "
Message them and ask. Keep the message. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?
Message them and ask. Keep the message. "
My messages auto delete.. But also people change profile names, people leave +come back ..some people are not on fab even  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?
Message them and ask. Keep the message. "
But the message will vanish if they go UNLOS |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I was of the understanding that was already the case, however, it would seem that the difference between this and as things stand now is 'mallice'.
Apparently, the current law is to fo with sharing such media with the intent to cause someone distress / harm etc but the new proposal is basically doing away with tgat caveat and simplifying things to just a matter of consent |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Soon it will be against the law to put videos/pics on internet without consent listening to Dominic Raab yesterday...not sure how this will be moderated here."
You should brush up on site rules fella. Fab already states that pictures MUST include profile owner with identities of others obscured - and, as I understand, that you must have consent of all those in the picture to post it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?
Message them and ask. Keep the message.
My messages auto delete.. But also people change profile names, people leave +come back ..some people are not on fab even "
Screenshot them. If people are not on fab and you have fucked them, surely you have an alternative contact for them? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?
Message them and ask. Keep the message.
But the message will vanish if they go UNLOS"
Screenshot it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *usie pTV/TS
over a year ago
taunton |
I sort of thought that was already the case but fook me going to take some policing, have to identify all the stars and ask if they gave permission, but presumably if someone claims you have put them on a video without consent you going to be in big shite seems like a mine field or maybe gold field for legal profession. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?
Message them and ask. Keep the message.
But the message will vanish if they go UNLOS
Screenshot it."
Yes I suppose that's an option. We don't post pics/vids of anyone but ourselves, however, plenty do. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why is it that as soon as consent is mentioned with regards to something sexual, people forget how to obtain consent?
It’s really not difficult. "
I suspect it will be extraordinarily difficult to enforce, but in terms of knowing for myself that I've obtained consent, that's pretty easy. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person? "
Consent forum signed the same as hub and hamster have
Any video on hub and hamster now is pro porn
even if the title says stranger dogging or what ever the title is completely porn bs
As a consent forum need to be filled in and I.d sent him off all people in the video
And yes videos aren’t atuo checked they manually check
As I have had a couple bonce back on me
Cleaning that I need to hand in the female I.D that soloed in the video and need to go though a bunch off plava to explain it’s me that’s in the video |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
And it’s all ready a law and has been for years op
Posting pics or share someone pics
Falls under revenge porn
I can see a lot off these group chats landing them selfs on a register |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?
Consent forum signed the same as hub and hamster have
Any video on hub and hamster now is pro porn
even if the title says stranger dogging or what ever the title is completely porn bs
As a consent forum need to be filled in and I.d sent him off all people in the video
And yes videos aren’t atuo checked they manually check
As I have had a couple bonce back on me
Cleaning that I need to hand in the female I.D that soloed in the video and need to go though a bunch off plava to explain it’s me that’s in the video "
Tbh, I think that was through Visa withdrawing payments, not UK law |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Sounds like an announcement simply to make it look as if the government are doing something about something.
Like ID for adult content. Which quietly vanished"
Still there
Hub and hamster require I.D and consent forums and all that to be done for a video to be posted |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?
Consent forum signed the same as hub and hamster have
Any video on hub and hamster now is pro porn
even if the title says stranger dogging or what ever the title is completely porn bs
As a consent forum need to be filled in and I.d sent him off all people in the video
And yes videos aren’t atuo checked they manually check
As I have had a couple bonce back on me
Cleaning that I need to hand in the female I.D that soloed in the video and need to go though a bunch off plava to explain it’s me that’s in the video
Tbh, I think that was through Visa withdrawing payments, not UK law"
Yes it was but it’s still the same thing thay use the uk government office app Yoti to check if your I.D is legit or not |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person? "
Easily in our case, screenshots the conversation asking if it's ok.
Mrs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
People involved I sexual would hopefully have all consented. However, posting that sexual activity on here or elsewhere is a different story. I often see photos or videos and wonder if that person gave consent for her or him to shown as online platform even if their faces have been obscured |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself "
How about video with other people?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rHotNottsMan
over a year ago
Dubai & Nottingham |
"
Any video on hub and hamster now is pro porn
"
There’s a video on hub of a fab member with an electric drill with a dildo attached with duct tape and various giggling women enjoying it, it’s hilarious and can assure you it ain’t pro porn, although it should be  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Soon it will be against the law to put videos/pics on internet without consent listening to Dominic Raab yesterday...not sure how this will be moderated here.
You should brush up on site rules fella. Fab already states that pictures MUST include profile owner with identities of others obscured - and, as I understand, that you must have consent of all those in the picture to post it"
True but the way the law it was described even that will not be acceptable, if you dont have consent of the other party |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself
There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?
Message them and ask. Keep the message.
My messages auto delete.. But also people change profile names, people leave +come back ..some people are not on fab even
Screenshot them. If people are not on fab and you have fucked them, surely you have an alternative contact for them?"
This the point I was trying to make. Trouble waters ahead |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think fab would just have to change the rules and only the person whose account it is can be in any photos even if they are blurred out. This will be trickier for couples accounts though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Everyone should calm down. Bully Raab will be away before this law is set up. "
Regardless it's not just him that is calling for this and has been in the cards for ages. I think it's about time we started looking at the law again because it doesn't really cover a world where most of us interact regularly on social media. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"And it’s all ready a law and has been for years op
Posting pics or share someone pics
Falls under revenge porn
I can see a lot off these group chats landing them selfs on a register "
Ch3ck this out your are confusing this. Reveng porn was for partner, people who had relationship. The new law will widen the legal cover. Even video modified to show people who were not in rhe original video will be illegal without consent. To put is simple al most any meterial put in a forum show have a consent. Covering the face with emoji will not be enough if someone complains about it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"People involved I sexual would hopefully have all consented. However, posting that sexual activity on here or elsewhere is a different story. I often see photos or videos and wonder if that person gave consent for her or him to shown as online platform even if their faces have been obscured"
These are somes of the loopholes the law is crying to close. Consent for sex, is not consent to recording; The body is not just the face. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Everyone should calm down. Bully Raab will be away before this law is set up. "
It is not just Raab's this the government reponce to multiple complains and campains. If anything it is like to be law sooner reither than later. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I read before that there's likely to be a whole can of worms over this as more children whose parents have posted pics of them online grow up. Maybe embarrassing things which could come back to haunt them and impact their mental health or even job opportunities.
Remember the guy who tried to sure nirvana for using his baby pic? Like that but multiplied by every parent who has posted something that might even been funny at the time, but the kid didn't get to consent. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Everyone should calm down. Bully Raab will be away before this law is set up.
Regardless it's not just him that is calling for this and has been in the cards for ages. I think it's about time we started looking at the law again because it doesn't really cover a world where most of us interact regularly on social media. "
Sound like to have been following this subject for a while. You need to go back to Mr Mosley's privacy case with The Sun few years ago to understand some of the consequences, and the public opinion these days.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I read before that there's likely to be a whole can of worms over this as more children whose parents have posted pics of them online grow up. Maybe embarrassing things which could come back to haunt them and impact their mental health or even job opportunities.
Remember the guy who tried to sure nirvana for using his baby pic? Like that but multiplied by every parent who has posted something that might even been funny at the time, but the kid didn't get to consent."
That will lead to no where. As parent you are the gardian ( unless parentalxright is removed from you), this give you quite a lot of rights, to make choices for the person including bad onces sometines. This is why social service step in to proptect children if they think you ain't acting in the child best interest. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think fab would just have to change the rules and only the person whose account it is can be in any photos even if they are blurred out. This will be trickier for couples accounts though. "
Exactly. Single people should only have photos of themselves. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ryan...Man
over a year ago
1950's Original |
I wonder if finally fabswingers will allow ordinary pics on profiles
( pet dogs,landscapes, pictures of freshly baked cakes, angel cake, chocolate cake,jam rolly Polly(the original steamed sort with suet) etc etc.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Soon it will be against the law to put videos/pics on internet without consent listening to Dominic Raab yesterday...not sure how this will be moderated here."
Whilst I agree on consent to pics and vids being posted online. Yes theres many on here thats been posted.
But really its about the cover up at downing street affair
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh8KscD256c |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
