FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Man returns to the moon
Man returns to the moon
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *gent Coulson OP Man
over a year ago
Secret hideaway in the pennines |
NASA have announced that the unmanned Orion command module has successfully entered lunar orbit.
This is the first time a vehicle has been launched to the moon that is capable of taking man back to the moon since 1972 when Apolo 17 left the Luna surface.
As a child who grew up in the age of Gemini and Apolo, I am excited to think that after 50 years we will finally see the human race taking to the stars |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I think she likes women too but who wouldnt want to go to them moons  "
yes this is a comment about kinky inked bi and her moon sized norks falling out of the sky to smush us all in the head  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
We all know the famous phrase "The Eagle has landed " but did you know they all had different names? Had Apollo 10 made it the announcement would have been "Snoopy has landed" .True fact |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Can you wank in zero gravity?"
Yes, and even tho we call it zero gravity, it isn't really. Everything has gravitational pull, the smaller the mass the smaller the pull. But even when you're on the space station, free floating objects will still be drawn towards the largest/closest celestial body.
Would make for a very interesting cum shot tho! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Picking people for any job to tick a box is wrong in every instance. "
How do you know that's what has happened?
I do agree with you. The best person for the job should get picked but what's to say they aren't also female and a POC? The article I read doesn't say they are simply mascots.
Evie |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *an4funMan
over a year ago
london |
"Returns to the moon?
Seriously??
We could maybe go now, but with technology the way it was 2 years after I was born, I don’t think there was a chance we’ve been there yet.
"
The earth is flat don't you know |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Picking people for any job to tick a box is wrong in every instance.
How do you know that's what has happened?
I do agree with you. The best person for the job should get picked but what's to say they aren't also female and a POC? The article I read doesn't say they are simply mascots.
Evie"
Because they announced it before the selection process. It was going to happen regardless but I accept they may have been the best choice anyway. Unlikely but possible. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Picking people for any job to tick a box is wrong in every instance.
How do you know that's what has happened?
I do agree with you. The best person for the job should get picked but what's to say they aren't also female and a POC? The article I read doesn't say they are simply mascots.
Evie"
NASA has form for choosing people to tick a box despite not necessarily being the right people. Remember the much trumpeted first space walk by females? Had to be cancelled literally at the last minute because they did not have space suits to fit women. They were actually in space not pre launch. Stinks of the public relations people forcing through a decision to tick said box |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Picking people for any job to tick a box is wrong in every instance.
How do you know that's what has happened?
I do agree with you. The best person for the job should get picked but what's to say they aren't also female and a POC? The article I read doesn't say they are simply mascots.
Evie
NASA has form for choosing people to tick a box despite not necessarily being the right people. Remember the much trumpeted first space walk by females? Had to be cancelled literally at the last minute because they did not have space suits to fit women. They were actually in space not pre launch. Stinks of the public relations people forcing through a decision to tick said box"
Who's fault is it that the correct suit was not provided for the female astronaut? It's certainly not her fault. Imagine going all the way up into space and not being able to do the space walk!! She must have felt really gutted and frankly, I hope she complained about the poor planning. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Picking people for any job to tick a box is wrong in every instance.
How do you know that's what has happened?
I do agree with you. The best person for the job should get picked but what's to say they aren't also female and a POC? The article I read doesn't say they are simply mascots.
Evie
NASA has form for choosing people to tick a box despite not necessarily being the right people. Remember the much trumpeted first space walk by females? Had to be cancelled literally at the last minute because they did not have space suits to fit women. They were actually in space not pre launch. Stinks of the public relations people forcing through a decision to tick said box
Who's fault is it that the correct suit was not provided for the female astronaut? It's certainly not her fault. Imagine going all the way up into space and not being able to do the space walk!! She must have felt really gutted and frankly, I hope she complained about the poor planning. "
I was not assigning blame,my point is someone said pick her regardless of her ability or equipment. Picked just because she was female |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Picking people for any job to tick a box is wrong in every instance.
How do you know that's what has happened?
I do agree with you. The best person for the job should get picked but what's to say they aren't also female and a POC? The article I read doesn't say they are simply mascots.
Evie
NASA has form for choosing people to tick a box despite not necessarily being the right people. Remember the much trumpeted first space walk by females? Had to be cancelled literally at the last minute because they did not have space suits to fit women. They were actually in space not pre launch. Stinks of the public relations people forcing through a decision to tick said box
Who's fault is it that the correct suit was not provided for the female astronaut? It's certainly not her fault. Imagine going all the way up into space and not being able to do the space walk!! She must have felt really gutted and frankly, I hope she complained about the poor planning.
I was not assigning blame,my point is someone said pick her regardless of her ability or equipment. Picked just because she was female "
NASA would not send someone who is not capable into space. Clearly she was capable. NASA are responsible for providing the right equipment to their astronauts, they presumably knew her proportions in plenty of time and had the technology to provide a suitable spacesuit? Failure of NASA's planning. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Picking people for any job to tick a box is wrong in every instance.
How do you know that's what has happened?
I do agree with you. The best person for the job should get picked but what's to say they aren't also female and a POC? The article I read doesn't say they are simply mascots.
Evie
Because they announced it before the selection process. It was going to happen regardless but I accept they may have been the best choice anyway. Unlikely but possible. "
Where has this been reported? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Returns to the moon?
Seriously??
We could maybe go now, but with technology the way it was 2 years after I was born, I don’t think there was a chance we’ve been there yet. "
Ah, fab, you never disappoint!
So, you clearly don't believe any of NASA's seven moon landings took place. What about the various uncrewed landingd?
What about the Chinese in 2019? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *gent Coulson OP Man
over a year ago
Secret hideaway in the pennines |
They already have numerous qualified astronauts which includes women and POC, I don't think they view this as a stunt or a gimmick, it takes years of training, mental and physical, crew selection is done years in advance.
The Artimis booster has gone through so much testing as has the Orion command module
I doubt very much NASA would want another challenger repartition. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Picking people for any job to tick a box is wrong in every instance. "
..and yet it is eagerly embraced bu governments and major employers everywhere. How woke are we.....? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Picking people for any job to tick a box is wrong in every instance.
How do you know that's what has happened?
I do agree with you. The best person for the job should get picked but what's to say they aren't also female and a POC? The article I read doesn't say they are simply mascots.
Evie
Because they announced it before the selection process. It was going to happen regardless but I accept they may have been the best choice anyway. Unlikely but possible.
Where has this been reported? "
Where I live we call it "the news" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
