FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > In your opinion, what makes someone fuckable but not dateable?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They’re on Fab …. #Fabicide" Why? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They’re on Fab …. #Fabicide Why? " Why not? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They’re on Fab …. #Fabicide" Do a woman's romantic prospects become worthless once she joins Fab? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They’re on Fab …. #Fabicide Do a woman's romantic prospects become worthless once she joins Fab? " *whoosh* it was *joke* .. hence the emojis … Gaw blimey … | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Previous things on here and other sites I’ve seen the reason for not dating being -had too many partners so couldn’t take them home to mum/not girlfriend material. " nutter magnet? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Previous things on here and other sites I’ve seen the reason for not dating being -had too many partners so couldn’t take them home to mum/not girlfriend material. " I hate that term so what if someone had loads off sex with loads off people they were single they were free to do as they please And also i would be happy they injoy them selfs But mind you I have a different mentality form most | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Too much baggage Age gap Wouldn't be seen in public with them Different lifestyles Not a long term prospect " This sums up it quite well. Basically, they aren't good enough to date for one, or more reasons. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Too much baggage Age gap Wouldn't be seen in public with them Different lifestyles Not a long term prospect " What would make you want to not be seen in public with someone? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Big fuck off Doc Martens. Do you own a pair op?" Nothing wrong with Dr Martins some of the tallest people wear them. I don’t think a footwear choice determine if a woman is undesirable. Could be wearing Adidas and be a unstable, violent, abuseive cheat. I. Fact more likely to bear wearing Adidas | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They’re on Fab …. #Fabicide Do a woman's romantic prospects become worthless once she joins Fab? *whoosh* it was *joke* .. hence the emojis … Gaw blimey … " It did go over my head ngl | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x" No answers, that is me though apparently | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Too much baggage Age gap Wouldn't be seen in public with them Different lifestyles Not a long term prospect What would make you want to not be seen in public with someone? " I thought that...And why would you fuck someone who thought that about you ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x No answers, that is me though apparently " Marry me ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x No answers, that is me though apparently " OK, so you've got a really thick lisp I take it? Not the cute kind. Irritating like? That or you collect something weird, like toe nail clippings or The Radio Times. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x No answers, that is me though apparently OK, so you've got a really thick lisp I take it? Not the cute kind. Irritating like? That or you collect something weird, like toe nail clippings or The Radio Times." I have a shoebox full of Kerrang! mags | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Big fuck off Doc Martens. Do you own a pair op? Nothing wrong with Dr Martins some of the tallest people wear them. I don’t think a footwear choice determine if a woman is undesirable. Could be wearing Adidas and be a unstable, violent, abuseive cheat. I. Fact more likely to bear wearing Adidas " Throw em in the bin and buy some crocs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x No answers, that is me though apparently OK, so you've got a really thick lisp I take it? Not the cute kind. Irritating like? That or you collect something weird, like toe nail clippings or The Radio Times. I have a shoebox full of Kerrang! mags " Ah kerrang is fine and shoe boxes are small. So you're alright. For now. But I'm watching | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x No answers, that is me though apparently OK, so you've got a really thick lisp I take it? Not the cute kind. Irritating like? Which issues That or you collect something weird, like toe nail clippings or The Radio Times. I have a shoebox full of Kerrang! mags " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They’re on Fab …. #Fabicide" Grabs the popcorn* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x" The opposite of what I'm looking for on my profile. Lol! 1. Not a gentleman. 2. Zero patience. 3. Terrible sexual skills but I'm just horny so just lie there and be my human dildo. don't talk or move. Lol! 4. Zero to low emotional intelligence. It would be a one-night, one-time thing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They’re on Fab …. #Fabicide Grabs the popcorn*" Lies about having popcorn | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They’re on Fab …. #Fabicide Grabs the popcorn* Lies about having popcorn " I do have sweet and salty popcorn in my hand right now! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x" Surely it is: Fuckable = on here Not dateable = on here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Too much baggage Age gap Wouldn't be seen in public with them Different lifestyles Not a long term prospect This sums up it quite well. Basically, they aren't good enough to date for one, or more reasons. " They're the reasons I'd give, plenty of men with far too much baggage to date, but they're ok for a bit of fun. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I thought that about someone I wouldn't do either as they clearly wouldn't be for me...... " Yes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x" Fuckable : cause u really like her . Why not datable ? there are chances : 1- u not emotionally ready ( trapped loves ) 2- u don’t feel 100% complete . 3- is not your interest . Others fear the dating cause all they think is : - commitment - pressure - agony . - pain - suffering - cheaters - charmers - Broken hearts . And sometimes there’s none of that . But just that fear is pressure itself already . I believe more then 90% of the anti - dating is fear of hurting . That is 100% my speculation . Is just my believes . High chance I be completely wrong . Tho … I think I’m not far . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A shitty personality..self absorbed types " That’s not even fuckable | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They’re on Fab …. #Fabicide Do a woman's romantic prospects become worthless once she joins Fab? " Never . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Previous things on here and other sites I’ve seen the reason for not dating being -had too many partners so couldn’t take them home to mum/not girlfriend material. " Fragments of excuses : - When u love someone u turn the world into a pyramid for her and nothing can reach the top | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A shitty personality..self absorbed types That’s not even fuckable " You're right but...alcohol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Serious answer .. Good looks, great body, flirty, vivacious.. all nice in the club isn’t it? Clingy, bit psycho, angry, bad tempered, controlling, rude .. alright to have an angry fuck with but settle down and set up home with? Naaahhhh " Angry fuck? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Serious answer .. Good looks, great body, flirty, vivacious.. all nice in the club isn’t it? Clingy, bit psycho, angry, bad tempered, controlling, rude .. alright to have an angry fuck with but settle down and set up home with? Naaahhhh Angry fuck?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Serious answer .. Good looks, great body, flirty, vivacious.. all nice in the club isn’t it? Clingy, bit psycho, angry, bad tempered, controlling, rude .. alright to have an angry fuck with but settle down and set up home with? Naaahhhh Angry fuck?" Porn ennit | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x" Anybody on here basically | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Serious answer .. Good looks, great body, flirty, vivacious.. all nice in the club isn’t it? Clingy, bit psycho, angry, bad tempered, controlling, rude .. alright to have an angry fuck with but settle down and set up home with? Naaahhhh Angry fuck? Porn ennit" Innit. Iiiiiii-nnit. C'mon guv, you're from Landan mate. Sort i'aaht. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically " Why | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why" I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship " What does a body count have to do with it? And what do you consider low? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship " How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description " Exactly. How does body count make you good or bad? I think anyone with a shit personality is undateable. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description " I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count" What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count" Like yourself… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count" Assumptions are the mother of all fuckups and to assume makes an ASS out of ME and U. Preferable not to assume but such is life. Enjoy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. " Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs" A quality meet, not just any meet in general. Unless you think we just open our legs for anyone who asks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs A quality meet, not just any meet in general. Unless you think we just open our legs for anyone who asks. " Im not sure what you mean. But im referring to women who dont do one nighters at all, as my idea of dateable/marriage material | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs A quality meet, not just any meet in general. Unless you think we just open our legs for anyone who asks. Im not sure what you mean. But im referring to women who dont do one nighters at all, as my idea of dateable/marriage material " Have you ever had a one nighter? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs" Would you find it reasonable for a woman to have the same requirements of any future husband? Few prior girlfriends and no sleeping around? We can't be having double standards...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs A quality meet, not just any meet in general. Unless you think we just open our legs for anyone who asks. Im not sure what you mean. But im referring to women who dont do one nighters at all, as my idea of dateable/marriage material Have you ever had a one nighter? " Yep i have | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs Would you find it reasonable for a woman to have the same requirements of any future husband? Few prior girlfriends and no sleeping around? We can't be having double standards......" Absolutely. If thats what she wants | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs A quality meet, not just any meet in general. Unless you think we just open our legs for anyone who asks. Im not sure what you mean. But im referring to women who dont do one nighters at all, as my idea of dateable/marriage material Have you ever had a one nighter? Yep i have" And you don't see the hypocrisy? At all? And by "quality meets" I mean not just any rando that sends me a dick pic with "alright love, wanna hop on it?". I mean someone with half a brain who's actually a nice person and respects me. That already discounts like 99.99999% of men on here. And on the off-chance I happen to find someone like that, he ghosts. Or he has a girlfriend. Or both. So no. It's not fucking easy to get a meet. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs A quality meet, not just any meet in general. Unless you think we just open our legs for anyone who asks. Im not sure what you mean. But im referring to women who dont do one nighters at all, as my idea of dateable/marriage material Have you ever had a one nighter? Yep i have And you don't see the hypocrisy? At all? And by "quality meets" I mean not just any rando that sends me a dick pic with "alright love, wanna hop on it?". I mean someone with half a brain who's actually a nice person and respects me. That already discounts like 99.99999% of men on here. And on the off-chance I happen to find someone like that, he ghosts. Or he has a girlfriend. Or both. So no. It's not fucking easy to get a meet. " No hypocrisy. As i said above, a woman is free to hold the same requirements i do. You still do casual sex though, don't you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs A quality meet, not just any meet in general. Unless you think we just open our legs for anyone who asks. Im not sure what you mean. But im referring to women who dont do one nighters at all, as my idea of dateable/marriage material Have you ever had a one nighter? Yep i have And you don't see the hypocrisy? At all? And by "quality meets" I mean not just any rando that sends me a dick pic with "alright love, wanna hop on it?". I mean someone with half a brain who's actually a nice person and respects me. That already discounts like 99.99999% of men on here. And on the off-chance I happen to find someone like that, he ghosts. Or he has a girlfriend. Or both. So no. It's not fucking easy to get a meet. No hypocrisy. As i said above, a woman is free to hold the same requirements i do. You still do casual sex though, don't you? " Not that it has anything to do with anything, and not that I need to justify anything to you, but I wouldn't if I had the choice. With most of my partners I thought there would be potential for something more, because that's what they made me believe. But as it turns out, men will just say whatever to get you into bed and then ghost or say they don't actually want to date before their dick's even had the chance to dry. So my body count is actually very close to the number of times I've had sex. Which, coincidentally, is not a lot. I guess it's my fault for being too stupid and naive and trusting and "picking the wrong ones", as someone's bound to tell me and oh my god what the fuck am I still doing on a site full of men who feel this way. Fuck this. Fuck feeling this worthless. I actually hate this place. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs A quality meet, not just any meet in general. Unless you think we just open our legs for anyone who asks. Im not sure what you mean. But im referring to women who dont do one nighters at all, as my idea of dateable/marriage material Have you ever had a one nighter? Yep i have And you don't see the hypocrisy? At all? And by "quality meets" I mean not just any rando that sends me a dick pic with "alright love, wanna hop on it?". I mean someone with half a brain who's actually a nice person and respects me. That already discounts like 99.99999% of men on here. And on the off-chance I happen to find someone like that, he ghosts. Or he has a girlfriend. Or both. So no. It's not fucking easy to get a meet. No hypocrisy. As i said above, a woman is free to hold the same requirements i do. You still do casual sex though, don't you? Not that it has anything to do with anything, and not that I need to justify anything to you, but I wouldn't if I had the choice. With most of my partners I thought there would be potential for something more, because that's what they made me believe. But as it turns out, men will just say whatever to get you into bed and then ghost or say they don't actually want to date before their dick's even had the chance to dry. So my body count is actually very close to the number of times I've had sex. Which, coincidentally, is not a lot. I guess it's my fault for being too stupid and naive and trusting and "picking the wrong ones", as someone's bound to tell me and oh my god what the fuck am I still doing on a site full of men who feel this way. Fuck this. Fuck feeling this worthless. I actually hate this place. " Not the site for you then, it sounds like | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs A quality meet, not just any meet in general. Unless you think we just open our legs for anyone who asks. Im not sure what you mean. But im referring to women who dont do one nighters at all, as my idea of dateable/marriage material Have you ever had a one nighter? Yep i have And you don't see the hypocrisy? At all? And by "quality meets" I mean not just any rando that sends me a dick pic with "alright love, wanna hop on it?". I mean someone with half a brain who's actually a nice person and respects me. That already discounts like 99.99999% of men on here. And on the off-chance I happen to find someone like that, he ghosts. Or he has a girlfriend. Or both. So no. It's not fucking easy to get a meet. No hypocrisy. As i said above, a woman is free to hold the same requirements i do. You still do casual sex though, don't you? Not that it has anything to do with anything, and not that I need to justify anything to you, but I wouldn't if I had the choice. With most of my partners I thought there would be potential for something more, because that's what they made me believe. But as it turns out, men will just say whatever to get you into bed and then ghost or say they don't actually want to date before their dick's even had the chance to dry. So my body count is actually very close to the number of times I've had sex. Which, coincidentally, is not a lot. I guess it's my fault for being too stupid and naive and trusting and "picking the wrong ones", as someone's bound to tell me and oh my god what the fuck am I still doing on a site full of men who feel this way. Fuck this. Fuck feeling this worthless. I actually hate this place. " I'm sorry you feel this way, you shouldn't feel that every man on here will just fuck and go unless that's what a person wants them to do. The meets I've had on here have been a memorable experience from start to finish for me. Whenever I get a meet, which isn't often living in the Shetland Islands, I have treated the woman with the utmost respect and always gone by her wishes of how the meet should go. Whether it's meeting for a drink or a meal beforehand, staying the night, so that they can feel some intimacy or just turning up and going right after. I know it might seem weird to some men, but I think when you are invited to meet someone you should try to make the person feel happy that they agreed to meet, instead of getting frustrated by people that just want to do what they want and bugger off when they've shot their load. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs A quality meet, not just any meet in general. Unless you think we just open our legs for anyone who asks. Im not sure what you mean. But im referring to women who dont do one nighters at all, as my idea of dateable/marriage material Have you ever had a one nighter? Yep i have And you don't see the hypocrisy? At all? And by "quality meets" I mean not just any rando that sends me a dick pic with "alright love, wanna hop on it?". I mean someone with half a brain who's actually a nice person and respects me. That already discounts like 99.99999% of men on here. And on the off-chance I happen to find someone like that, he ghosts. Or he has a girlfriend. Or both. So no. It's not fucking easy to get a meet. No hypocrisy. As i said above, a woman is free to hold the same requirements i do. You still do casual sex though, don't you? Not that it has anything to do with anything, and not that I need to justify anything to you, but I wouldn't if I had the choice. With most of my partners I thought there would be potential for something more, because that's what they made me believe. But as it turns out, men will just say whatever to get you into bed and then ghost or say they don't actually want to date before their dick's even had the chance to dry. So my body count is actually very close to the number of times I've had sex. Which, coincidentally, is not a lot. I guess it's my fault for being too stupid and naive and trusting and "picking the wrong ones", as someone's bound to tell me and oh my god what the fuck am I still doing on a site full of men who feel this way. Fuck this. Fuck feeling this worthless. I actually hate this place. I'm sorry you feel this way, you shouldn't feel that every man on here will just fuck and go unless that's what a person wants them to do. The meets I've had on here have been a memorable experience from start to finish for me. Whenever I get a meet, which isn't often living in the Shetland Islands, I have treated the woman with the utmost respect and always gone by her wishes of how the meet should go. Whether it's meeting for a drink or a meal beforehand, staying the night, so that they can feel some intimacy or just turning up and going right after. I know it might seem weird to some men, but I think when you are invited to meet someone you should try to make the person feel happy that they agreed to meet, instead of getting frustrated by people that just want to do what they want and bugger off when they've shot their load." Chief, shes gone. No need to simp | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well, that escalated quickly. " Indeed it did. Good thing I got married before I came on Fab. Lol! Dunno what he would say about the wives on Fab..... This is how I out the chaff any way. I'm going to start telling any man that ask that my body count is high/ 100..I would say 200 but who really has time to be counting all that. I've seen those low body count requests for wives backfire spectacularly in marriages/relationships when said low body count woman's libido drops to zero or she will only do vanilla stuff. There is such a thing as being equally yoked. I like to travel. I can't be in a relationship with someone who never wants to go anywhere. I've got enough emotional intelligence to know that I'm not going to change a homebody into a jetsetter. But I just got to leave people where they are and let them figure it out for themselves. I'm too old for trying to convince people otherwise. For the record when I got married, I had a low body count and I didn't want a promiscuous man or a man into non-vanilla sex. Good luck all. Being single is looking better every day. At least I can say at one point I was "marriage/girlfriend" material. Now I'm "me" material. Lol! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm sorry you feel this way, you shouldn't feel that every man on here will just fuck and go unless that's what a person wants them to do. The meets I've had on here have been a memorable experience from start to finish for me. Whenever I get a meet, which isn't often living in the Shetland Islands, I have treated the woman with the utmost respect and always gone by her wishes of how the meet should go. Whether it's meeting for a drink or a meal beforehand, staying the night, so that they can feel some intimacy or just turning up and going right after. I know it might seem weird to some men, but I think when you are invited to meet someone you should try to make the person feel happy that they agreed to meet, instead of getting frustrated by people that just want to do what they want and bugger off when they've shot their load. Good to know some gentlemen still exist." Thanks x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anybody on here basically Why I would only want to date someone with a low body count. People on here are fine for just sex, but not for dating /relationship How do you know people on here have a "high body count"? And what a god-awful description I dont know, but its a reasonable assumption to make given the nature of the site. Your opinion of my description is none of my concern As for the lady above asking whats a high count, that's a difficult one to answer, but chances are, anyone who has been on here a while and into casual sex will have a considerable count What is "considerable" though? I feel like you think it's easier to get a meet than it actually is. Can't speak for all women on here but I'm not exactly drowning in cock. Well i think ita very easy as a woman to get a meet, if you really wanted to. Regardless of that, i dont have an answer for your question about what is 'considerable'. But i do know that my idea of a dateable of marriage type woman, for me, is someone who previously wasnt into one night stands, meets etc and perhaps has only had a few prior BFs A quality meet, not just any meet in general. Unless you think we just open our legs for anyone who asks. Im not sure what you mean. But im referring to women who dont do one nighters at all, as my idea of dateable/marriage material " So would you marry someone who declined to have sex prior to it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who was that? " Timber | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who was that? Timber " I thought so. That's a shame. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who was that? Timber I thought so. That's a shame. " Yes, I really liked her posts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who was that? Timber I thought so. That's a shame. " I hope she didn't leave over some of the brain dead answers in this thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s a shame the OP has felt she has to leave the site over the answers to this thread. Hopefully after sleeping on it overnight and renewed clarity she will come back as she did some good threads and seemed a nice person. I guess the moral here is though whilst it HAS happened on occasion, maybe an internet fuck site isn’t the best option to finding a longer term dating partner. There are other sites for that. Most of the men here are looking to get their dicks wet and move on to the next willing pussy, it’s not necessarily a place for Mr Right (although as I say it has happened but it’s more exception than norm) I hope the OP finds someone who’s totally into her who will love her and respect her, and vice versa " Goodness..this is sad ...I liked timber | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x" Anyone with a profile on a Swingers site. I would fuck them but would not trust them to date them. However many people do meet partners on here and are very happy. Just I am not compatible with them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x Anyone with a profile on a Swingers site. I would fuck them but would not trust them to date them. However many people do meet partners on here and are very happy. Just I am not compatible with them. " I didn't answer the question..... she's gone. Oh I'll answer anyway. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s a shame the OP has felt she has to leave the site over the answers to this thread. Hopefully after sleeping on it overnight and renewed clarity she will come back as she did some good threads and seemed a nice person. I guess the moral here is though whilst it HAS happened on occasion, maybe an internet fuck site isn’t the best option to finding a longer term dating partner. There are other sites for that. Most of the men here are looking to get their dicks wet and move on to the next willing pussy, it’s not necessarily a place for Mr Right (although as I say it has happened but it’s more exception than norm) I hope the OP finds someone who’s totally into her who will love her and respect her, and vice versa " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Coming late to this thread. I am sorry to see Timber go. I know it is becoming fashionable in the parts to say you can use the site for whatever you want but, at its heart, it is (and always has been) a swinging site and people (men, women and couples) are here for sex. By all means look for other stuff as well but you can’t be surprised if people just want to meet others for sex." I don't think anyone issurprised but the attitude of some is quite shameful. They are looking for sex but at the same time they are looking down on the people they want to have sex with. It's a pretty shoddy attitude. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Coming late to this thread. I am sorry to see Timber go. I know it is becoming fashionable in the parts to say you can use the site for whatever you want but, at its heart, it is (and always has been) a swinging site and people (men, women and couples) are here for sex. By all means look for other stuff as well but you can’t be surprised if people just want to meet others for sex. I don't think anyone issurprised but the attitude of some is quite shameful. They are looking for sex but at the same time they are looking down on the people they want to have sex with. It's a pretty shoddy attitude." Who is looking down on people? Not wanting to date someone doesn't mean they are looking down on them. It's a very entitled attitude to say that anyone should date them no matter what. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Coming late to this thread. I am sorry to see Timber go. I know it is becoming fashionable in the parts to say you can use the site for whatever you want but, at its heart, it is (and always has been) a swinging site and people (men, women and couples) are here for sex. By all means look for other stuff as well but you can’t be surprised if people just want to meet others for sex. I don't think anyone issurprised but the attitude of some is quite shameful. They are looking for sex but at the same time they are looking down on the people they want to have sex with. It's a pretty shoddy attitude. Who is looking down on people? Not wanting to date someone doesn't mean they are looking down on them. It's a very entitled attitude to say that anyone should date them no matter what." Maybe they mean the person who said that people from here are okay to fuck but not to date or marry. There could be other reasons other than looking down but they made a clear statement that people from here are not dateable - due to the number of people they'd had sex with . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". Who is looking down on people? " Some people on this thread are as evidenced by there comments. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"RIP Timber! Long live the madonna-whore dichotomy. Off to church, keeping my body count low since the middle ages " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answers on a postcard x" They send postcards. Serious answer: a shallow personality- if they can’t hold a conversation while clothes are on, chances are they lack imagination when the clothes come off too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Coming late to this thread. I am sorry to see Timber go. I know it is becoming fashionable in the parts to say you can use the site for whatever you want but, at its heart, it is (and always has been) a swinging site and people (men, women and couples) are here for sex. By all means look for other stuff as well but you can’t be surprised if people just want to meet others for sex. I don't think anyone issurprised but the attitude of some is quite shameful. They are looking for sex but at the same time they are looking down on the people they want to have sex with. It's a pretty shoddy attitude. Who is looking down on people? Not wanting to date someone doesn't mean they are looking down on them. It's a very entitled attitude to say that anyone should date them no matter what. Maybe they mean the person who said that people from here are okay to fuck but not to date or marry. There could be other reasons other than looking down but they made a clear statement that people from here are not dateable - due to the number of people they'd had sex with ." I find the whole getting upset about the number of people thing just a bit My take is that it is insecurity and a bit of hypocrisy that makes people worry about someone’s previous sexual life. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well I have a new chat up line. "I wanna fuck you so hard, you will be come undateable" Should I include a dick pic to make sure it guarantees success ?" Good idea but change it to fuck you so often ....... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There is a big wide world out there OP, full of lovely people who really don’t give a stuff about your sexual PAST. And that’s what it is, your past. We all have one. Don’t let those with double standards make you doubt yourself. The right person for you is the right person for you. No matter where you meet them, in what circumstances, or their prior sexual history. " Maybe there are some with double standards, but I'm certainly not one of those. I already said in an earlier comment that i have no issue if the woman wants to apply the same standard at her end | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trouble is, like everything, it's an open ended statement that draws out a lot of insecurity as to the why, as if recognising attraction but realising long term incompatibility is a bad thing. It isn't. That's totally normal. What isn't, is misleading, deceiving and manipulating others to meet their needs. Everyone has their own line in the sand, that's fine too. The reasons might be unpalatable, but that's fine also. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Coming late to this thread. I am sorry to see Timber go. I know it is becoming fashionable in the parts to say you can use the site for whatever you want but, at its heart, it is (and always has been) a swinging site and people (men, women and couples) are here for sex. By all means look for other stuff as well but you can’t be surprised if people just want to meet others for sex. I don't think anyone issurprised but the attitude of some is quite shameful. They are looking for sex but at the same time they are looking down on the people they want to have sex with. It's a pretty shoddy attitude. Who is looking down on people? Not wanting to date someone doesn't mean they are looking down on them. It's a very entitled attitude to say that anyone should date them no matter what. Maybe they mean the person who said that people from here are okay to fuck but not to date or marry. There could be other reasons other than looking down but they made a clear statement that people from here are not dateable - due to the number of people they'd had sex with ." If youre referring to me, im not looking down on anyone. Just like that lady said she wouldnt date anyone from here because she wouldnt trust them, i wouldnt date anyonr from here because of prior body count. Whats the difference? Why are you giving her a pass but not me? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trouble is, like everything, it's an open ended statement that draws out a lot of insecurity as to the why, as if recognising attraction but realising long term incompatibility is a bad thing. It isn't. That's totally normal. What isn't, is misleading, deceiving and manipulating others to meet their needs. Everyone has their own line in the sand, that's fine too. The reasons might be unpalatable, but that's fine also. " . Agreed. I’m sure, on these forums, a lot of people won’t comment how they really feel due to the backlash, in fact I know they won’t. I like the people who aren’t afraid to give their true opinions on here, even if it gets them grief, whether I agree with them or not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Coming late to this thread. I am sorry to see Timber go. I know it is becoming fashionable in the parts to say you can use the site for whatever you want but, at its heart, it is (and always has been) a swinging site and people (men, women and couples) are here for sex. By all means look for other stuff as well but you can’t be surprised if people just want to meet others for sex. I don't think anyone issurprised but the attitude of some is quite shameful. They are looking for sex but at the same time they are looking down on the people they want to have sex with. It's a pretty shoddy attitude. Who is looking down on people? Not wanting to date someone doesn't mean they are looking down on them. It's a very entitled attitude to say that anyone should date them no matter what. Maybe they mean the person who said that people from here are okay to fuck but not to date or marry. There could be other reasons other than looking down but they made a clear statement that people from here are not dateable - due to the number of people they'd had sex with . I find the whole getting upset about the number of people thing just a bit My take is that it is insecurity and a bit of hypocrisy that makes people worry about someone’s previous sexual life. " The thread though is about fuckability vs dateability .. I can kind of understand someone wanting to fuck a nymphomaniac who needs sex as often as they can as a one-off versus wanting to long-term date them but always wondering if they’re out fucking elsewhere to satisfy their needs. It’s perfectly acceptable (imho) to be happy about shagging someone but not wanting them as your life partner. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trouble is, like everything, it's an open ended statement that draws out a lot of insecurity as to the why, as if recognising attraction but realising long term incompatibility is a bad thing. It isn't. That's totally normal. What isn't, is misleading, deceiving and manipulating others to meet their needs. Everyone has their own line in the sand, that's fine too. The reasons might be unpalatable, but that's fine also. . Agreed. I’m sure, on these forums, a lot of people won’t comment how they really feel due to the backlash, in fact I know they won’t. I like the people who aren’t afraid to give their true opinions on here, even if it gets them grief, whether I agree with them or not. " Fine. Put some socks on. You'll catch cold flashing that much leg. Behave. Happy? But yes, there's plenty of pandering. It's nauseating. Be yourself and if you can't, reflect as to why. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Coming late to this thread. I am sorry to see Timber go. I know it is becoming fashionable in the parts to say you can use the site for whatever you want but, at its heart, it is (and always has been) a swinging site and people (men, women and couples) are here for sex. By all means look for other stuff as well but you can’t be surprised if people just want to meet others for sex. I don't think anyone issurprised but the attitude of some is quite shameful. They are looking for sex but at the same time they are looking down on the people they want to have sex with. It's a pretty shoddy attitude. Who is looking down on people? Not wanting to date someone doesn't mean they are looking down on them. It's a very entitled attitude to say that anyone should date them no matter what. Maybe they mean the person who said that people from here are okay to fuck but not to date or marry. There could be other reasons other than looking down but they made a clear statement that people from here are not dateable - due to the number of people they'd had sex with . I find the whole getting upset about the number of people thing just a bit My take is that it is insecurity and a bit of hypocrisy that makes people worry about someone’s previous sexual life. The thread though is about fuckability vs dateability .. I can kind of understand someone wanting to fuck a nymphomaniac who needs sex as often as they can as a one-off versus wanting to long-term date them but always wondering if they’re out fucking elsewhere to satisfy their needs. It’s perfectly acceptable (imho) to be happy about shagging someone but not wanting them as your life partner. " It absolutely is! Who is anyone to say it’s not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trouble is, like everything, it's an open ended statement that draws out a lot of insecurity as to the why, as if recognising attraction but realising long term incompatibility is a bad thing. It isn't. That's totally normal. What isn't, is misleading, deceiving and manipulating others to meet their needs. Everyone has their own line in the sand, that's fine too. The reasons might be unpalatable, but that's fine also. . Agreed. I’m sure, on these forums, a lot of people won’t comment how they really feel due to the backlash, in fact I know they won’t. I like the people who aren’t afraid to give their true opinions on here, even if it gets them grief, whether I agree with them or not. " the truth hurts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Coming late to this thread. I am sorry to see Timber go. I know it is becoming fashionable in the parts to say you can use the site for whatever you want but, at its heart, it is (and always has been) a swinging site and people (men, women and couples) are here for sex. By all means look for other stuff as well but you can’t be surprised if people just want to meet others for sex. I don't think anyone issurprised but the attitude of some is quite shameful. They are looking for sex but at the same time they are looking down on the people they want to have sex with. It's a pretty shoddy attitude. Who is looking down on people? Not wanting to date someone doesn't mean they are looking down on them. It's a very entitled attitude to say that anyone should date them no matter what. Maybe they mean the person who said that people from here are okay to fuck but not to date or marry. There could be other reasons other than looking down but they made a clear statement that people from here are not dateable - due to the number of people they'd had sex with . If youre referring to me, im not looking down on anyone. Just like that lady said she wouldnt date anyone from here because she wouldnt trust them, i wouldnt date anyonr from here because of prior body count. Whats the difference? Why are you giving her a pass but not me? " Slow down nanaman..... I didn't say you were looking down on anyone. I DID say maybe the person who said that 'people were looking down on others' meant you. I found what you said , open fair and honest. Totally abhorrent , unreasonable , dated and judgemental but certainly open, fair and honest and an opinion you are entitled to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trouble is, like everything, it's an open ended statement that draws out a lot of insecurity as to the why, as if recognising attraction but realising long term incompatibility is a bad thing. It isn't. That's totally normal. What isn't, is misleading, deceiving and manipulating others to meet their needs. Everyone has their own line in the sand, that's fine too. The reasons might be unpalatable, but that's fine also. . Agreed. I’m sure, on these forums, a lot of people won’t comment how they really feel due to the backlash, in fact I know they won’t. I like the people who aren’t afraid to give their true opinions on here, even if it gets them grief, whether I agree with them or not. the truth hurts " In some cases I think it does. Some extremely defensive folk on here. Not necessarily on this thread. Just in general. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trouble is, like everything, it's an open ended statement that draws out a lot of insecurity as to the why, as if recognising attraction but realising long term incompatibility is a bad thing. It isn't. That's totally normal. What isn't, is misleading, deceiving and manipulating others to meet their needs. Everyone has their own line in the sand, that's fine too. The reasons might be unpalatable, but that's fine also. . Agreed. I’m sure, on these forums, a lot of people won’t comment how they really feel due to the backlash, in fact I know they won’t. I like the people who aren’t afraid to give their true opinions on here, even if it gets them grief, whether I agree with them or not. the truth hurts In some cases I think it does. Some extremely defensive folk on here. Not necessarily on this thread. Just in general. " exactly some see the negative in everything and some like to antagonise | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Coming late to this thread. I am sorry to see Timber go. I know it is becoming fashionable in the parts to say you can use the site for whatever you want but, at its heart, it is (and always has been) a swinging site and people (men, women and couples) are here for sex. By all means look for other stuff as well but you can’t be surprised if people just want to meet others for sex. I don't think anyone issurprised but the attitude of some is quite shameful. They are looking for sex but at the same time they are looking down on the people they want to have sex with. It's a pretty shoddy attitude. Who is looking down on people? Not wanting to date someone doesn't mean they are looking down on them. It's a very entitled attitude to say that anyone should date them no matter what. Maybe they mean the person who said that people from here are okay to fuck but not to date or marry. There could be other reasons other than looking down but they made a clear statement that people from here are not dateable - due to the number of people they'd had sex with . If youre referring to me, im not looking down on anyone. Just like that lady said she wouldnt date anyone from here because she wouldnt trust them, i wouldnt date anyonr from here because of prior body count. Whats the difference? Why are you giving her a pass but not me? Slow down nanaman..... I didn't say you were looking down on anyone. I DID say maybe the person who said that 'people were looking down on others' meant you. I found what you said , open fair and honest. Totally abhorrent , unreasonable , dated and judgemental but certainly open, fair and honest and an opinion you are entitled to. " I dont agree at all with 'Totally abhorrent , unreasonable , dated and judgemental'. Im not being unreasonable, its just a preference. Im not being judgemental either, shes free to feel the same way if she likes. Im unsure what relevance 'dated' has; are we all automatically supposed to change because of the ticking of a clock? And as for abhorrent, i think thats a massive stretch and very inappropriate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unpopular opinion but I’d wager that there’s a huge amount of men on here who fuck women that they’d never date and not just because of ‘body count’ or promiscuity but because many men fuck women they aren't particularly attracted to! " Yes theres certainly that too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Coming late to this thread. I am sorry to see Timber go. I know it is becoming fashionable in the parts to say you can use the site for whatever you want but, at its heart, it is (and always has been) a swinging site and people (men, women and couples) are here for sex. By all means look for other stuff as well but you can’t be surprised if people just want to meet others for sex. I don't think anyone issurprised but the attitude of some is quite shameful. They are looking for sex but at the same time they are looking down on the people they want to have sex with. It's a pretty shoddy attitude. Who is looking down on people? Not wanting to date someone doesn't mean they are looking down on them. It's a very entitled attitude to say that anyone should date them no matter what. Maybe they mean the person who said that people from here are okay to fuck but not to date or marry. There could be other reasons other than looking down but they made a clear statement that people from here are not dateable - due to the number of people they'd had sex with . I find the whole getting upset about the number of people thing just a bit My take is that it is insecurity and a bit of hypocrisy that makes people worry about someone’s previous sexual life. The thread though is about fuckability vs dateability .. I can kind of understand someone wanting to fuck a nymphomaniac who needs sex as often as they can as a one-off versus wanting to long-term date them but always wondering if they’re out fucking elsewhere to satisfy their needs. It’s perfectly acceptable (imho) to be happy about shagging someone but not wanting them as your life partner. " I couldn't keep up/ satisfy someone who was a nymphomaniac or had a high body count so I wouldn't date them. I wouldn't trust them to be happy with monthly sex. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unpopular opinion but I’d wager that there’s a huge amount of men on here who fuck women that they’d never date and not just because of ‘body count’ or promiscuity but because many men fuck women they aren't particularly attracted to! " Attraction is a spectrum. A large majority will, when the urge takes them, go anywhere the purple headed lust monster leads them. And that can adjust taste, boundaries and everything in between. That's life though, women do the same though not to the same extent we can make sweeping generalisations. It's all about experience, judging the individual and compatibility with your values, time and need. And that Venn diagram can be constantly shifting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trouble is, like everything, it's an open ended statement that draws out a lot of insecurity as to the why, as if recognising attraction but realising long term incompatibility is a bad thing. It isn't. That's totally normal. What isn't, is misleading, deceiving and manipulating others to meet their needs. Everyone has their own line in the sand, that's fine too. The reasons might be unpalatable, but that's fine also. . Agreed. I’m sure, on these forums, a lot of people won’t comment how they really feel due to the backlash, in fact I know they won’t. I like the people who aren’t afraid to give their true opinions on here, even if it gets them grief, whether I agree with them or not. the truth hurts In some cases I think it does. Some extremely defensive folk on here. Not necessarily on this thread. Just in general. " Woah I’m staying clear last time I got blown out the water | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trouble is, like everything, it's an open ended statement that draws out a lot of insecurity as to the why, as if recognising attraction but realising long term incompatibility is a bad thing. It isn't. That's totally normal. What isn't, is misleading, deceiving and manipulating others to meet their needs. Everyone has their own line in the sand, that's fine too. The reasons might be unpalatable, but that's fine also. . Agreed. I’m sure, on these forums, a lot of people won’t comment how they really feel due to the backlash, in fact I know they won’t. I like the people who aren’t afraid to give their true opinions on here, even if it gets them grief, whether I agree with them or not. the truth hurts In some cases I think it does. Some extremely defensive folk on here. Not necessarily on this thread. Just in general. Woah I’m staying clear last time I got blown out the water " Haha that’s probably best sweetie | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trouble is, like everything, it's an open ended statement that draws out a lot of insecurity as to the why, as if recognising attraction but realising long term incompatibility is a bad thing. It isn't. That's totally normal. What isn't, is misleading, deceiving and manipulating others to meet their needs. Everyone has their own line in the sand, that's fine too. The reasons might be unpalatable, but that's fine also. . Agreed. I’m sure, on these forums, a lot of people won’t comment how they really feel due to the backlash, in fact I know they won’t. I like the people who aren’t afraid to give their true opinions on here, even if it gets them grief, whether I agree with them or not. the truth hurts In some cases I think it does. Some extremely defensive folk on here. Not necessarily on this thread. Just in general. Woah I’m staying clear last time I got blown out the water " Youre late to the party anyway, thread almost full | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unpopular opinion but I’d wager that there’s a huge amount of men on here who fuck women that they’d never date and not just because of ‘body count’ or promiscuity but because many men fuck women they aren't particularly attracted to! Attraction is a spectrum. A large majority will, when the urge takes them, go anywhere the purple headed lust monster leads them. And that can adjust taste, boundaries and everything in between. That's life though, women do the same though not to the same extent we can make sweeping generalisations. It's all about experience, judging the individual and compatibility with your values, time and need. And that Venn diagram can be constantly shifting." On here though woman don’t need to fuck guys they’re not attracted to. So I’d wager it doesn’t happen anywhere near as often. For many many men their need for sex outweighs any need for mutual attraction. There’s no doubt that a lot of men would fuck women they’d never deem attractive enough to date/intro to friends etc! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unpopular opinion but I’d wager that there’s a huge amount of men on here who fuck women that they’d never date and not just because of ‘body count’ or promiscuity but because many men fuck women they aren't particularly attracted to! " I'm a woman and there's men here that I would fuck but wouldn't date. It's got nothing to do with their body count though, so presumably that's acceptable? People can set their own standards for who they are willing to date, so long as they're not giving anyone a misleading impression about their intentions, that's their right | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |