FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Has King Charles, earned his place.
Has King Charles, earned his place.
Jump to: Newest in thread
What monarch has ever earned their place? They claim to be gods chosen representative on Earth but most Royal Families ended up where they are through war.
So no. No one with a hereditary title has earned their place. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What monarch has ever earned their place? They claim to be gods chosen representative on Earth but most Royal Families ended up where they are through war.
So no. No one with a hereditary title has earned their place."
I would say Charles II probably has a good claim. He was invited to become king by the Parliament of the day. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Massive debate on it in the pub very divided opinions, what's yours ? "
if the next in line to become king or queen went to a national vote he would lose out to william or harry or even anne his adultry antics with the dog he is now shagging should have ruled him out..  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Massive debate on it in the pub very divided opinions, what's yours ? if the next in line to become king or queen went to a national vote he would lose out to william or harry or even anne his adultry antics with the dog he is now shagging should have ruled him out.. "
Yeah because kings have always been the paragon of virtue.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Massive debate on it in the pub very divided opinions, what's yours ? if the next in line to become king or queen went to a national vote he would lose out to william or harry or even anne his adultry antics with the dog he is now shagging should have ruled him out.. "
So Camilla is a dog? How very immature of you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Massive debate on it in the pub very divided opinions, what's yours ? if the next in line to become king or queen went to a national vote he would lose out to william or harry or even anne his adultry antics with the dog he is now shagging should have ruled him out.. "
I disagree with your wording and insults towards a woman who has no right of reply. However in previous times he would probably have been required to abdicate because the Queen Consort is divorced. If adultery ruled out succeeding to the throne there would probably only be about two possible heirs in the entire commonwealth |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
A hereditary expectation and it doesn’t come with a get out clause unless you particularly want to be ostracised
I think he will do a good job but William will be the change maker… I think he will modernise the monarchy where he can |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rHotNottsMan
over a year ago
Dubai & Nottingham |
I think he had yes, he’s been in training since birth, a whole life of sacrifices and limitations for a role he never chose but accepted. That’s how a monarchy works. I’m not a big fan of him, but there are far worse people in our political elite |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Massive debate on it in the pub very divided opinions, what's yours ? if the next in line to become king or queen went to a national vote he would lose out to william or harry or even anne his adultry antics with the dog he is now shagging should have ruled him out.. "
Why do you have to be so derogatory towards Camilla? Should he have stayed with a woman he didn't love?
If anything the fact he divorced, remarried and I'd king is quite progressive for the royal family.
Just because you don't fancy her doesn't make her a dog. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Massive debate on it in the pub very divided opinions, what's yours ? if the next in line to become king or queen went to a national vote he would lose out to william or harry or even anne his adultry antics with the dog he is now shagging should have ruled him out..
Why do you have to be so derogatory towards Camilla? Should he have stayed with a woman he didn't love?
If anything the fact he divorced, remarried and I'd king is quite progressive for the royal family.
Just because you don't fancy her doesn't make her a dog. "
Well said  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ribsaMan
over a year ago
A box at end of your bed |
I think he will be a good king but it does remain to be seen, let's face it he has had the longest apprentiship of anyone. I also think he understands his people and countrys needs from his involvement in Princes trust and other things along the same line he has been involved with, he is wanting to bring back apprentiships so many of the dieing skills are not lost forever. I guess time will tell but unfortunately at 73 it may not be long before Prince William becomes king. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think he will be a good king but it does remain to be seen, let's face it he has had the longest apprentiship of anyone. I also think he understands his people and countrys needs from his involvement in Princes trust and other things along the same line he has been involved with, he is wanting to bring back apprentiships so many of the dieing skills are not lost forever. I guess time will tell but unfortunately at 73 it may not be long before Prince William becomes king. "
He might get twenty or more years if he lives as long as his parents. That gives William a good shot at having a bit of a life before he has to take over |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I didn't vote for him.... So no. If he had any concern for the people of this country he would refuse to cooperate with this shower of shit Government and insist that a General election be held. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I didn't vote for him.... So no. If he had any concern for the people of this country he would refuse to cooperate with this shower of shit Government and insist that a General election be held. "
I dint think that's in his power, is it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I didn't vote for him.... So no. If he had any concern for the people of this country he would refuse to cooperate with this shower of shit Government and insist that a General election be held.
I dint think that's in his power, is it? "
Stand corrected. I googled. It is |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I didn't vote for him.... So no. If he had any concern for the people of this country he would refuse to cooperate with this shower of shit Government and insist that a General election be held.
I dint think that's in his power, is it? "
In theory he could, but it'd be a constitutional crisis.
(Although in 2022, isn't constitutional crisis a synonym for Wednesday?) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"I didn't vote for him.... So no. If he had any concern for the people of this country he would refuse to cooperate with this shower of shit Government and insist that a General election be held.
I dint think that's in his power, is it?
Stand corrected. I googled. It is "
People say the royals don't do politics. That's not true.
Who does the PM seek permission from to go to war? Who gives permission to form a new government after an election. Who opens Parliment. Who is the most famous anti republican family?
Going abroad as ambassadors, isn't that political? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
No and yes. They got there due to luck and thefts from us citizens, suppressing us as they continued - that's no more earning than the gains of criminal gangs that would be locked up. Not to mention letting the masses die in poverty.
He legally earned it, through his fortune of birth and his dutiful service through life. Not a patch on his mother but he's OK. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I didn't vote for him.... So no. If he had any concern for the people of this country he would refuse to cooperate with this shower of shit Government and insist that a General election be held. "
Didn't work out so great the last time a King Charles had a quarrel with govt/Parliament, especially for the King!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No and yes. They got there due to luck and thefts from us citizens, suppressing us as they continued - that's no more earning than the gains of criminal gangs that would be locked up. Not to mention letting the masses die in poverty.
He legally earned it, through his fortune of birth and his dutiful service through life. Not a patch on his mother but he's OK. "
not sure that there were that many citizens in the days his bloodline took over the reign the common personsage were classed as subjects in the begining of their reign. Also believe they had more to do with granting individaul citizenship both to members of the three countries forming the Union than any forebears. Theft means you actually owned something few subjects actually own anything. I do agree though he earned it through his birth right.
Why do people seem to feel society rules and laws were the same as they preceive them to be today beats me.
But somewhat sad you feels you should punish the history of your country and apply that punishment by applying it in your eara. Jugdement is a fickle friend cast your stone only when your personage is entirely free from blame. If you stand by your line of thought then better check your forebears against your current social stature rare to find no black sheep anywhere in any time lines. But please feel free to express your opinion there are just that and lucky we are free to do so. By our own birth right by foretune of birth.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Massive debate on it in the pub very divided opinions, what's yours ? if the next in line to become king or queen went to a national vote he would lose out to william or harry or even anne his adultry antics with the dog he is now shagging should have ruled him out..
Why do you have to be so derogatory towards Camilla? Should he have stayed with a woman he didn't love?
If anything the fact he divorced, remarried and I'd king is quite progressive for the royal family.
Just because you don't fancy her doesn't make her a dog. "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *9alMan
over a year ago
Bridgend |
as monarch he becomes head of the Church of England & his morals & re married / divorced state may bring him into conflict with the more orthodox parts of the church so perhaps passing the crown straight to William would have been Beter |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *TG3Man
over a year ago
Dorchester |
I love the monarchy but think that Prince Charles isn't man enough for the job the Queen RIP kept the monarchy in order, Charles unfortunately doesn't cut it for me...... I mean is Camilla a worthy Queen consort? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I love the monarchy but think that Prince Charles isn't man enough for the job the Queen RIP kept the monarchy in order, Charles unfortunately doesn't cut it for me...... I mean is Camilla a worthy Queen consort? "
What are your reasons for thinking this? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Earning your place on a throne is a bit like retrospective planning permission.
If you embrace the role you've been born to fulfill you could try to carve your square self down to fit in the round hole and be worthy of the deference people will start to express towards you.
I suppose it depends how big a dose of humility and morality you have |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Outside of his treatment of Diana - yes he has - he set up the princes trust and helped thousands into a career, his focus on the environment was visionary and what he said is now coming to be realised with the climate crisis. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What monarch has ever earned their place? They claim to be gods chosen representative on Earth but most Royal Families ended up where they are through war.
So no. No one with a hereditary title has earned their place."
The only SANE answer. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
He was born to be King, he doesn't need to 'earn' it. The 'divine right of Kings' and all that. I suppose the question is whether the monarchy itself is appropriate. But would we rather a Putin, Xi, Berlusconi .... or even a Biden? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
