FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Au-natural ladies with hairy armpits
Au-natural ladies with hairy armpits
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
 | |||
| |||
 | |||
"Is it just me or do others find a hairy lady a massive turn on. Sadly very few and far between nowadays. " It's just you. | |||
 | |||
| |||
"I’m a hairy lady. I do alright. "Love it | |||
"I like women with hairy armpits. Met quite a few in my circles. Usually I find it’s more younger women though 18-25 with a statement to make. Any woman confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals "Or you know maybe just maybe some of us don’t like the look and feel of a hairy bush or armpits! | |||
M | |||
 | |||
"I like women with hairy armpits. Met quite a few in my circles. Usually I find it’s more younger women though 18-25 with a statement to make. Any woman confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals
Or you know maybe just maybe some of us don’t like the look and feel of a hairy bush or armpits! "Good for you That’s cute and all but has no baring in what I typed  | |||
"I like women with hairy armpits. Met quite a few in my circles. Usually I find it’s more younger women though 18-25 with a statement to make. Any woman confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals
Or you know maybe just maybe some of us don’t like the look and feel of a hairy bush or armpits! "^^^ a 1000 times this It's patronising to the nth degree to equate choosing hair to being confident!! Choosing no hair is not because a person is a brainwashed, cowardly social-sheep Omfg It's a bit  to only see it as a social justice warrior stance
We all make personal hygiene choices for our own selves.
I personally think it's rank and feels eww and sweaty and eww and nope....
Rank, sticky pits with hair plastered down and leg hair that catches against your clothes and hurts if it's pressed against the grain and vaginas that become unruly petri dishes....
Not on my wish list, ever.
But Emmeline Pankhurst's hard work will not be undone if I choose to de-forest my own self and feel fresher and more comfortable on the daily | |||
| |||
| |||
"As long as she doesnt have a beard i dont mind her hairy tits" What about a Mexican moustache? Asking for a…..friend. Olé! | |||
| |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. " Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna" Exactly this! | |||
| |||
"I’m a hairy lady. I do alright. "Looking gorgeous | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"I like women with hairy armpits. Met quite a few in my circles. Usually I find it’s more younger women though 18-25 with a statement to make. Any woman confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals
Or you know maybe just maybe some of us don’t like the look and feel of a hairy bush or armpits!
^^^ a 1000 times this
It's patronising to the nth degree to equate choosing hair to being confident!! Choosing no hair is not because a person is a brainwashed, cowardly social-sheep
Omfg
It's a bit to only see it as a social justice warrior stance
We all make personal hygiene choices for our own selves.
I personally think it's rank and feels eww and sweaty and eww and nope....
Rank, sticky pits with hair plastered down and leg hair that catches against your clothes and hurts if it's pressed against the grain and vaginas that become unruly petri dishes....
Not on my wish list, ever.
But Emmeline Pankhurst's hard work will not be undone if I choose to de-forest my own self and feel fresher and more comfortable on the daily "I keep mine trimmed and tidy, don't really care what other ladies do or don't do. It's never been an issue, had some nice remarks face to face, some nasty remarks on social media, nothing new there then. I'm a confident, successful lady, nothing whatsoever to do with the length of my pubic hair. I've met shaved, trimmed and natural ladies both UK and overseas. In all camps some are nice, some not so nice and some outright half wits. If you find something attractive or a turn on, good luck to you. I've never found it equates to confidence except on a couple of occasions, one in a club, once in a party. Both ladies admired my pubes but said they felt they wouldn't 'fit in' if they didn't shave. For me, tend not to admire the stubble look.  | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna" I personally don’t think that what WiltsTSgirl said was completely non sense and hypocritical but pondered actually. Maybe you and other women shave them off because you believe it is more hygienic, yet it doesn’t mean that the argument doesn’t stand. Quite the opposite, because if it was only a hygienic question, everyone would do it regardless of gender. But you can’t deny that more women than men shave their armpits. Therefore wiltstgirl’s argument is too far fetched and completely non sense but rather based on an observation of society as a whole. To go even further, why this opinion is non sense but not yours ? | |||
"Wouldn't turn me on, but I'd probably not be bothered by it, as long as its clean, then crack on with with the job in hand ? Doesn't turn me off " 'Crack on with the job in hand'. You silver tongued devil you, who said romance is dead. | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna I personally don’t think that what WiltsTSgirl said was completely non sense and hypocritical but pondered actually. Maybe you and other women shave them off because you believe it is more hygienic, yet it doesn’t mean that the argument doesn’t stand. Quite the opposite, because if it was only a hygienic question, everyone would do it regardless of gender. But you can’t deny that more women than men shave their armpits. Therefore wiltstgirl’s argument is too far fetched and completely non sense but rather based on an observation of society as a whole. To go even further, why this opinion is non sense but not yours ? " 1. It's hypocritical because they lauded bucking a trend that they themselves follow. 2. It's nonsense because they conflated confidence with a personal hygiene choice 3. It's not anyone's place to dictate a personal choice or try to influence said choice by reverse psychology of labelling those who choose one way as superior to those who choose the other. 4. I mention hygiene but also comfort. Others choose their way for their reasons. Sweeping generalisations are for the birds. Lastly, far far more men shave than is realised | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna I personally don’t think that what WiltsTSgirl said was completely non sense and hypocritical but pondered actually. Maybe you and other women shave them off because you believe it is more hygienic, yet it doesn’t mean that the argument doesn’t stand. Quite the opposite, because if it was only a hygienic question, everyone would do it regardless of gender. But you can’t deny that more women than men shave their armpits. Therefore wiltstgirl’s argument is too far fetched and completely non sense but rather based on an observation of society as a whole. To go even further, why this opinion is non sense but not yours ? 1. It's hypocritical because they lauded bucking a trend that they themselves follow. 2. It's nonsense because they conflated confidence with a personal hygiene choice 3. It's not anyone's place to dictate a personal choice or try to influence said choice by reverse psychology of labelling those who choose one way as superior to those who choose the other. 4. I mention hygiene but also comfort. Others choose their way for their reasons. Sweeping generalisations are for the birds. Lastly, far far more men shave than is realised" Oh maybe far more men do it but not as much as women so the argument stands. Birds with hairy armpits or without ?! But points by points : 1 : quite the opposite, recognising that your are following a trend and how this trend arises do not make you an hypocrite. Not recognising the influence that society has on ppl’s subjectivities is hypocritical though. 2. To linked it to the first point, our Personal hygiene choices are also arising from our societal environment. For instance, toilets rolls against bidets. 3. Yet that’s exactly what you did by not taking into consideration the argument and underlining that yours was the absolute truth and claiming that hers was absolutely non sense. 4. Even if others choose a certain way of life, they are still influenced one way or another by societal norms. | |||
 | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna I personally don’t think that what WiltsTSgirl said was completely non sense and hypocritical but pondered actually. Maybe you and other women shave them off because you believe it is more hygienic, yet it doesn’t mean that the argument doesn’t stand. Quite the opposite, because if it was only a hygienic question, everyone would do it regardless of gender. But you can’t deny that more women than men shave their armpits. Therefore wiltstgirl’s argument is too far fetched and completely non sense but rather based on an observation of society as a whole. To go even further, why this opinion is non sense but not yours ? 1. It's hypocritical because they lauded bucking a trend that they themselves follow. 2. It's nonsense because they conflated confidence with a personal hygiene choice 3. It's not anyone's place to dictate a personal choice or try to influence said choice by reverse psychology of labelling those who choose one way as superior to those who choose the other. 4. I mention hygiene but also comfort. Others choose their way for their reasons. Sweeping generalisations are for the birds. Lastly, far far more men shave than is realised Oh maybe far more men do it but not as much as women so the argument stands. Birds with hairy armpits or without ?! But points by points : 1 : quite the opposite, recognising that your are following a trend and how this trend arises do not make you an hypocrite. Not recognising the influence that society has on ppl’s subjectivities is hypocritical though. 2. To linked it to the first point, our Personal hygiene choices are also arising from our societal environment. For instance, toilets rolls against bidets. 3. Yet that’s exactly what you did by not taking into consideration the argument and underlining that yours was the absolute truth and claiming that hers was absolutely non sense. 4. Even if others choose a certain way of life, they are still influenced one way or another by societal norms. " Oh dear, I'll keep it short. 1. You totally ignored my point. 2. pain or discomfort due to hair is independant of society and entirely within the boundaries of my own body and my choice to alleviate 3. If you would be so kind as to reread my point you'll realise your response bears no relation to what I said. 4. Another random statement from you with zero link to what I said, but thank you for sharing You're veering in to the nonsense puddle too now. | |||
| |||
"As long as she doesnt have a beard i dont mind her hairy tits What about a Mexican moustache? Asking for a…..friend. Olé!" only if thet talk like speedy gonzalez | |||
| |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna I personally don’t think that what WiltsTSgirl said was completely non sense and hypocritical but pondered actually. Maybe you and other women shave them off because you believe it is more hygienic, yet it doesn’t mean that the argument doesn’t stand. Quite the opposite, because if it was only a hygienic question, everyone would do it regardless of gender. But you can’t deny that more women than men shave their armpits. Therefore wiltstgirl’s argument is too far fetched and completely non sense but rather based on an observation of society as a whole. To go even further, why this opinion is non sense but not yours ? 1. It's hypocritical because they lauded bucking a trend that they themselves follow. 2. It's nonsense because they conflated confidence with a personal hygiene choice 3. It's not anyone's place to dictate a personal choice or try to influence said choice by reverse psychology of labelling those who choose one way as superior to those who choose the other. 4. I mention hygiene but also comfort. Others choose their way for their reasons. Sweeping generalisations are for the birds. Lastly, far far more men shave than is realised Oh maybe far more men do it but not as much as women so the argument stands. Birds with hairy armpits or without ?! But points by points : 1 : quite the opposite, recognising that your are following a trend and how this trend arises do not make you an hypocrite. Not recognising the influence that society has on ppl’s subjectivities is hypocritical though. 2. To linked it to the first point, our Personal hygiene choices are also arising from our societal environment. For instance, toilets rolls against bidets. 3. Yet that’s exactly what you did by not taking into consideration the argument and underlining that yours was the absolute truth and claiming that hers was absolutely non sense. 4. Even if others choose a certain way of life, they are still influenced one way or another by societal norms. Oh dear, I'll keep it short. 1. You totally ignored my point. And you mine and her point too. 2. pain or discomfort due to hair is independant of society and entirely within the boundaries of my own body and my choice to alleviate. You have the right to do so but can’t ignore how the trend for women to do so. 3. If you would be so kind as to reread my point you'll realise your response bears no relation to what I said. Sure if you said so. 4. Another random statement from you with zero link to what I said, but thank you for sharing You're veering in to the nonsense puddle too now." ok if you said so. Her argument was totally valid, even if you want to admit it or not. She had a point. Even if you feel you are above her point, she did have a point and jumped on her quite harshly. | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna I personally don’t think that what WiltsTSgirl said was completely non sense and hypocritical but pondered actually. Maybe you and other women shave them off because you believe it is more hygienic, yet it doesn’t mean that the argument doesn’t stand. Quite the opposite, because if it was only a hygienic question, everyone would do it regardless of gender. But you can’t deny that more women than men shave their armpits. Therefore wiltstgirl’s argument is too far fetched and completely non sense but rather based on an observation of society as a whole. To go even further, why this opinion is non sense but not yours ? 1. It's hypocritical because they lauded bucking a trend that they themselves follow. 2. It's nonsense because they conflated confidence with a personal hygiene choice 3. It's not anyone's place to dictate a personal choice or try to influence said choice by reverse psychology of labelling those who choose one way as superior to those who choose the other. 4. I mention hygiene but also comfort. Others choose their way for their reasons. Sweeping generalisations are for the birds. Lastly, far far more men shave than is realised Oh maybe far more men do it but not as much as women so the argument stands. Birds with hairy armpits or without ?! But points by points : 1 : quite the opposite, recognising that your are following a trend and how this trend arises do not make you an hypocrite. Not recognising the influence that society has on ppl’s subjectivities is hypocritical though. 2. To linked it to the first point, our Personal hygiene choices are also arising from our societal environment. For instance, toilets rolls against bidets. 3. Yet that’s exactly what you did by not taking into consideration the argument and underlining that yours was the absolute truth and claiming that hers was absolutely non sense. 4. Even if others choose a certain way of life, they are still influenced one way or another by societal norms. Oh dear, I'll keep it short. 1. You totally ignored my point. And you mine and her point too. 2. pain or discomfort due to hair is independant of society and entirely within the boundaries of my own body and my choice to alleviate. You have the right to do so but can’t ignore how the trend for women to do so. 3. If you would be so kind as to reread my point you'll realise your response bears no relation to what I said. Sure if you said so. 4. Another random statement from you with zero link to what I said, but thank you for sharing You're veering in to the nonsense puddle too now. ok if you said so. Her argument was totally valid, even if you want to admit it or not. She had a point. Even if you feel you are above her point, she did have a point and jumped on her quite harshly. " Says who though? That's just your opinion, one that you consider an absolute truth. I disagree. In MY opinion, it wasn't valid. And I am entitled to think that. At no stage did I claim to be superior so please don't try to muddy this any more than you already have. I see nothing harsh here. You seem determined to slant this that way though, I think that makes you the harsh one.... | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna I personally don’t think that what WiltsTSgirl said was completely non sense and hypocritical but pondered actually. Maybe you and other women shave them off because you believe it is more hygienic, yet it doesn’t mean that the argument doesn’t stand. Quite the opposite, because if it was only a hygienic question, everyone would do it regardless of gender. But you can’t deny that more women than men shave their armpits. Therefore wiltstgirl’s argument is too far fetched and completely non sense but rather based on an observation of society as a whole. To go even further, why this opinion is non sense but not yours ? 1. It's hypocritical because they lauded bucking a trend that they themselves follow. 2. It's nonsense because they conflated confidence with a personal hygiene choice 3. It's not anyone's place to dictate a personal choice or try to influence said choice by reverse psychology of labelling those who choose one way as superior to those who choose the other. 4. I mention hygiene but also comfort. Others choose their way for their reasons. Sweeping generalisations are for the birds. Lastly, far far more men shave than is realised Oh maybe far more men do it but not as much as women so the argument stands. Birds with hairy armpits or without ?! But points by points : 1 : quite the opposite, recognising that your are following a trend and how this trend arises do not make you an hypocrite. Not recognising the influence that society has on ppl’s subjectivities is hypocritical though. 2. To linked it to the first point, our Personal hygiene choices are also arising from our societal environment. For instance, toilets rolls against bidets. 3. Yet that’s exactly what you did by not taking into consideration the argument and underlining that yours was the absolute truth and claiming that hers was absolutely non sense. 4. Even if others choose a certain way of life, they are still influenced one way or another by societal norms. Oh dear, I'll keep it short. 1. You totally ignored my point. And you mine and her point too. 2. pain or discomfort due to hair is independant of society and entirely within the boundaries of my own body and my choice to alleviate. You have the right to do so but can’t ignore how the trend for women to do so. 3. If you would be so kind as to reread my point you'll realise your response bears no relation to what I said. Sure if you said so. 4. Another random statement from you with zero link to what I said, but thank you for sharing You're veering in to the nonsense puddle too now. ok if you said so. Her argument was totally valid, even if you want to admit it or not. She had a point. Even if you feel you are above her point, she did have a point and jumped on her quite harshly. Says who though? That's just your opinion, one that you consider an absolute truth. I disagree. In MY opinion, it wasn't valid. And I am entitled to think that. At no stage did I claim to be superior so please don't try to muddy this any more than you already have. I see nothing harsh here. You seem determined to slant this that way though, I think that makes you the harsh one...." You didn’t claim it per se but underlined it by saying that she said was non sense while what you did was somehow the absolute truth. You are entitled to think that , but as she is and as I am and I just raised mine as you did yours. | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna I personally don’t think that what WiltsTSgirl said was completely non sense and hypocritical but pondered actually. Maybe you and other women shave them off because you believe it is more hygienic, yet it doesn’t mean that the argument doesn’t stand. Quite the opposite, because if it was only a hygienic question, everyone would do it regardless of gender. But you can’t deny that more women than men shave their armpits. Therefore wiltstgirl’s argument is too far fetched and completely non sense but rather based on an observation of society as a whole. To go even further, why this opinion is non sense but not yours ? 1. It's hypocritical because they lauded bucking a trend that they themselves follow. 2. It's nonsense because they conflated confidence with a personal hygiene choice 3. It's not anyone's place to dictate a personal choice or try to influence said choice by reverse psychology of labelling those who choose one way as superior to those who choose the other. 4. I mention hygiene but also comfort. Others choose their way for their reasons. Sweeping generalisations are for the birds. Lastly, far far more men shave than is realised Oh maybe far more men do it but not as much as women so the argument stands. Birds with hairy armpits or without ?! But points by points : 1 : quite the opposite, recognising that your are following a trend and how this trend arises do not make you an hypocrite. Not recognising the influence that society has on ppl’s subjectivities is hypocritical though. 2. To linked it to the first point, our Personal hygiene choices are also arising from our societal environment. For instance, toilets rolls against bidets. 3. Yet that’s exactly what you did by not taking into consideration the argument and underlining that yours was the absolute truth and claiming that hers was absolutely non sense. 4. Even if others choose a certain way of life, they are still influenced one way or another by societal norms. Oh dear, I'll keep it short. 1. You totally ignored my point. And you mine and her point too. 2. pain or discomfort due to hair is independant of society and entirely within the boundaries of my own body and my choice to alleviate. You have the right to do so but can’t ignore how the trend for women to do so. 3. If you would be so kind as to reread my point you'll realise your response bears no relation to what I said. Sure if you said so. 4. Another random statement from you with zero link to what I said, but thank you for sharing You're veering in to the nonsense puddle too now. ok if you said so. Her argument was totally valid, even if you want to admit it or not. She had a point. Even if you feel you are above her point, she did have a point and jumped on her quite harshly. Says who though? That's just your opinion, one that you consider an absolute truth. I disagree. In MY opinion, it wasn't valid. And I am entitled to think that. At no stage did I claim to be superior so please don't try to muddy this any more than you already have. I see nothing harsh here. You seem determined to slant this that way though, I think that makes you the harsh one.... You didn’t claim it per se but underlined it by saying that she said was non sense while what you did was somehow the absolute truth. You are entitled to think that , but as she is and as I am and I just raised mine as you did yours. " i raised my cock at seeing you both argue | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna I personally don’t think that what WiltsTSgirl said was completely non sense and hypocritical but pondered actually. Maybe you and other women shave them off because you believe it is more hygienic, yet it doesn’t mean that the argument doesn’t stand. Quite the opposite, because if it was only a hygienic question, everyone would do it regardless of gender. But you can’t deny that more women than men shave their armpits. Therefore wiltstgirl’s argument is too far fetched and completely non sense but rather based on an observation of society as a whole. To go even further, why this opinion is non sense but not yours ? 1. It's hypocritical because they lauded bucking a trend that they themselves follow. 2. It's nonsense because they conflated confidence with a personal hygiene choice 3. It's not anyone's place to dictate a personal choice or try to influence said choice by reverse psychology of labelling those who choose one way as superior to those who choose the other. 4. I mention hygiene but also comfort. Others choose their way for their reasons. Sweeping generalisations are for the birds. Lastly, far far more men shave than is realised Oh maybe far more men do it but not as much as women so the argument stands. Birds with hairy armpits or without ?! But points by points : 1 : quite the opposite, recognising that your are following a trend and how this trend arises do not make you an hypocrite. Not recognising the influence that society has on ppl’s subjectivities is hypocritical though. 2. To linked it to the first point, our Personal hygiene choices are also arising from our societal environment. For instance, toilets rolls against bidets. 3. Yet that’s exactly what you did by not taking into consideration the argument and underlining that yours was the absolute truth and claiming that hers was absolutely non sense. 4. Even if others choose a certain way of life, they are still influenced one way or another by societal norms. Oh dear, I'll keep it short. 1. You totally ignored my point. And you mine and her point too. 2. pain or discomfort due to hair is independant of society and entirely within the boundaries of my own body and my choice to alleviate. You have the right to do so but can’t ignore how the trend for women to do so. 3. If you would be so kind as to reread my point you'll realise your response bears no relation to what I said. Sure if you said so. 4. Another random statement from you with zero link to what I said, but thank you for sharing You're veering in to the nonsense puddle too now. ok if you said so. Her argument was totally valid, even if you want to admit it or not. She had a point. Even if you feel you are above her point, she did have a point and jumped on her quite harshly. Says who though? That's just your opinion, one that you consider an absolute truth. I disagree. In MY opinion, it wasn't valid. And I am entitled to think that. At no stage did I claim to be superior so please don't try to muddy this any more than you already have. I see nothing harsh here. You seem determined to slant this that way though, I think that makes you the harsh one.... You didn’t claim it per se but underlined it by saying that she said was non sense while what you did was somehow the absolute truth. You are entitled to think that , but as she is and as I am and I just raised mine as you did yours. " Wow You could have just typed 'last word' It's okay though, I did it for you  | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna I personally don’t think that what WiltsTSgirl said was completely non sense and hypocritical but pondered actually. Maybe you and other women shave them off because you believe it is more hygienic, yet it doesn’t mean that the argument doesn’t stand. Quite the opposite, because if it was only a hygienic question, everyone would do it regardless of gender. But you can’t deny that more women than men shave their armpits. Therefore wiltstgirl’s argument is too far fetched and completely non sense but rather based on an observation of society as a whole. To go even further, why this opinion is non sense but not yours ? 1. It's hypocritical because they lauded bucking a trend that they themselves follow. 2. It's nonsense because they conflated confidence with a personal hygiene choice 3. It's not anyone's place to dictate a personal choice or try to influence said choice by reverse psychology of labelling those who choose one way as superior to those who choose the other. 4. I mention hygiene but also comfort. Others choose their way for their reasons. Sweeping generalisations are for the birds. Lastly, far far more men shave than is realised Oh maybe far more men do it but not as much as women so the argument stands. Birds with hairy armpits or without ?! But points by points : 1 : quite the opposite, recognising that your are following a trend and how this trend arises do not make you an hypocrite. Not recognising the influence that society has on ppl’s subjectivities is hypocritical though. 2. To linked it to the first point, our Personal hygiene choices are also arising from our societal environment. For instance, toilets rolls against bidets. 3. Yet that’s exactly what you did by not taking into consideration the argument and underlining that yours was the absolute truth and claiming that hers was absolutely non sense. 4. Even if others choose a certain way of life, they are still influenced one way or another by societal norms. Oh dear, I'll keep it short. 1. You totally ignored my point. And you mine and her point too. 2. pain or discomfort due to hair is independant of society and entirely within the boundaries of my own body and my choice to alleviate. You have the right to do so but can’t ignore how the trend for women to do so. 3. If you would be so kind as to reread my point you'll realise your response bears no relation to what I said. Sure if you said so. 4. Another random statement from you with zero link to what I said, but thank you for sharing You're veering in to the nonsense puddle too now. ok if you said so. Her argument was totally valid, even if you want to admit it or not. She had a point. Even if you feel you are above her point, she did have a point and jumped on her quite harshly. Says who though? That's just your opinion, one that you consider an absolute truth. I disagree. In MY opinion, it wasn't valid. And I am entitled to think that. At no stage did I claim to be superior so please don't try to muddy this any more than you already have. I see nothing harsh here. You seem determined to slant this that way though, I think that makes you the harsh one.... You didn’t claim it per se but underlined it by saying that she said was non sense while what you did was somehow the absolute truth. You are entitled to think that , but as she is and as I am and I just raised mine as you did yours. Wow You could have just typed 'last word' It's okay though, I did it for you "last word anal extravaganza | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna I personally don’t think that what WiltsTSgirl said was completely non sense and hypocritical but pondered actually. Maybe you and other women shave them off because you believe it is more hygienic, yet it doesn’t mean that the argument doesn’t stand. Quite the opposite, because if it was only a hygienic question, everyone would do it regardless of gender. But you can’t deny that more women than men shave their armpits. Therefore wiltstgirl’s argument is too far fetched and completely non sense but rather based on an observation of society as a whole. To go even further, why this opinion is non sense but not yours ? 1. It's hypocritical because they lauded bucking a trend that they themselves follow. 2. It's nonsense because they conflated confidence with a personal hygiene choice 3. It's not anyone's place to dictate a personal choice or try to influence said choice by reverse psychology of labelling those who choose one way as superior to those who choose the other. 4. I mention hygiene but also comfort. Others choose their way for their reasons. Sweeping generalisations are for the birds. Lastly, far far more men shave than is realised Oh maybe far more men do it but not as much as women so the argument stands. Birds with hairy armpits or without ?! But points by points : 1 : quite the opposite, recognising that your are following a trend and how this trend arises do not make you an hypocrite. Not recognising the influence that society has on ppl’s subjectivities is hypocritical though. 2. To linked it to the first point, our Personal hygiene choices are also arising from our societal environment. For instance, toilets rolls against bidets. 3. Yet that’s exactly what you did by not taking into consideration the argument and underlining that yours was the absolute truth and claiming that hers was absolutely non sense. 4. Even if others choose a certain way of life, they are still influenced one way or another by societal norms. Oh dear, I'll keep it short. 1. You totally ignored my point. And you mine and her point too. 2. pain or discomfort due to hair is independant of society and entirely within the boundaries of my own body and my choice to alleviate. You have the right to do so but can’t ignore how the trend for women to do so. 3. If you would be so kind as to reread my point you'll realise your response bears no relation to what I said. Sure if you said so. 4. Another random statement from you with zero link to what I said, but thank you for sharing You're veering in to the nonsense puddle too now. ok if you said so. Her argument was totally valid, even if you want to admit it or not. She had a point. Even if you feel you are above her point, she did have a point and jumped on her quite harshly. Says who though? That's just your opinion, one that you consider an absolute truth. I disagree. In MY opinion, it wasn't valid. And I am entitled to think that. At no stage did I claim to be superior so please don't try to muddy this any more than you already have. I see nothing harsh here. You seem determined to slant this that way though, I think that makes you the harsh one.... You didn’t claim it per se but underlined it by saying that she said was non sense while what you did was somehow the absolute truth. You are entitled to think that , but as she is and as I am and I just raised mine as you did yours. Wow You could have just typed 'last word' It's okay though, I did it for you " long life to hairy armpits to compete to societal standards | |||
| |||
" " | |||
"Is it just me or do others find a hairy lady a massive turn on. Sadly very few and far between nowadays. " Armpit hair should be kept to the film sets of Starwars movies #chewbaccaporn #wookieporn I am not a great fan of lapkelp either to be honest | |||
"If I'm not meeting I don't shave anything. Believe or not,I do wash/have baths." The hygiene statements that get tossed around crack me up. A lady in a shop the other day smelt like she hadn't heard of soap therefore her bits must be hairy. Do bald men smell different to those unhygienic fellas with a full head of hair. If you shave armpits and only trim lady bits does that throw off a different aroma. These forums are the best laugh going, especially any medical subjects. | |||
| |||
| |||
"Anyway I nicked my foreskin earlier when shaving my chin. This too gets in the way "I’ll hold your foreskin out the way next time you fancy a shave. I’m good like that! | |||
"Anyway I nicked my foreskin earlier when shaving my chin. This too gets in the way
I’ll hold your foreskin out the way next time you fancy a shave. I’m good like that!"Yes please. With your mouth | |||
"Anyway I nicked my foreskin earlier when shaving my chin. This too gets in the way
I’ll hold your foreskin out the way next time you fancy a shave. I’m good like that!
Yes please. With your mouth " | |||
| |||
| |||
"It's reported to have existed in the stone age and all through the stages and ages since....for male and female "Yes, basically because they thought it was more hygienic and healthy. Turns out they were mistaken and shaving makes your skin more susceptible to health problems (e.g. pubic hair reduces the chance of catching some STIs). | |||
"It's reported to have existed in the stone age and all through the stages and ages since....for male and female
Yes, basically because they thought it was more hygienic and healthy. Turns out they were mistaken and shaving makes your skin more susceptible to health problems (e.g. pubic hair reduces the chance of catching some STIs)."But you’ll have people argue that having hair is more unhygienic than without | |||
"It's reported to have existed in the stone age and all through the stages and ages since....for male and female
Yes, basically because they thought it was more hygienic and healthy. Turns out they were mistaken and shaving makes your skin more susceptible to health problems (e.g. pubic hair reduces the chance of catching some STIs).
But you’ll have people argue that having hair is more unhygienic than without "Even now | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Is it just me or do others find a hairy lady a massive turn on. Sadly very few and far between nowadays. " Massive turn on. Love a woman with natural pubic hair, armpit hair and real eyebrows/lashes. | |||
"Bring back the bush! Too much hassle to keep on top of shaving and waxing and all that faff. Be better if more men liked it. They’ve been watching porn with hairless women in it for too long. 40/50 years ago more men would have said they preferred it as it was more the norm back then. More women had a bush although I think women have been shaving their pits and legs for a lot longer than that. In the last 15 years I think I’ve only been intimate with 2 men who have vocally said they preferred hair. I personally think it looks better to see a woman with hair. I shave and grow mine, depending on my level of being arsedness. " Definitely bring back the bush. | |||
"It's reported to have existed in the stone age and all through the stages and ages since....for male and female
Yes, basically because they thought it was more hygienic and healthy. Turns out they were mistaken and shaving makes your skin more susceptible to health problems (e.g. pubic hair reduces the chance of catching some STIs)."Not what I read. Go figure | |||
| |||
""Body hair provides an ideal environment for lice and other unwanted critters, and can also be a breeding ground for fungal infections, particularly in hot or humid weather." And that's just one...." Just ask any dermatologist and they'll tell you that shaving/waxing/etc is less hygienic than leaving it alone. Or Google it, where you'll find lots of authoritative sources that say the same. It really doesn't matter all that much, because if someone wants to shave/wax/etc then you don't need to justify your preferences (although you could probably keep the puke emoji to yourself..) | |||
"I like women with hairy armpits. Met quite a few in my circles. Usually I find it’s more younger women though 18-25 with a statement to make. Any woman confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals
Or you know maybe just maybe some of us don’t like the look and feel of a hairy bush or armpits! "Dont be silly, it MUST be all this conforming to all these dastardly societal norms, or something something, patriarchy, something something | |||
#currently not | |||
""Body hair provides an ideal environment for lice and other unwanted critters, and can also be a breeding ground for fungal infections, particularly in hot or humid weather." And that's just one.... Just ask any dermatologist and they'll tell you that shaving/waxing/etc is less hygienic than leaving it alone. Or Google it, where you'll find lots of authoritative sources that say the same. It really doesn't matter all that much, because if someone wants to shave/wax/etc then you don't need to justify your preferences (although you could probably keep the puke emoji to yourself..)"Hard to believe this thread is still going but hey ho. If you've read the whole ridiculous thread you'll have seen I was actually making the case that we each get to choose for ourselves and for our own reasons. The derailing came when folk tried to say hair or no hair had other connotations. I did indeed see all of those articles also don't worry. But basically there's a vast array of reasons arguing both for and against it health wise. It's not 100% either way and we all get to decide for ourselves how clean feels or looks. And if it makes me feel it I'll use it... | |||
| |||
"Is it just me or do others find a hairy lady a massive turn on. Sadly very few and far between nowadays. " No, went out with a girl from Germany when I was stationed over there. Massive turn off when we took our clothes off and saw her hairy armpits. But I was 18 and very randy, so it only bothered me for a minute | |||
| |||
""Body hair provides an ideal environment for lice and other unwanted critters, and can also be a breeding ground for fungal infections, particularly in hot or humid weather." And that's just one.... Just ask any dermatologist and they'll tell you that shaving/waxing/etc is less hygienic than leaving it alone. Or Google it, where you'll find lots of authoritative sources that say the same. It really doesn't matter all that much, because if someone wants to shave/wax/etc then you don't need to justify your preferences (although you could probably keep the puke emoji to yourself..)
Hard to believe this thread is still going but hey ho.
If you've read the whole ridiculous thread you'll have seen I was actually making the case that we each get to choose for ourselves and for our own reasons.
The derailing came when folk tried to say hair or no hair had other connotations.
I did indeed see all of those articles also don't worry.
But basically there's a vast array of reasons arguing both for and against it health wise. It's not 100% either way and we all get to decide for ourselves how clean feels or looks.
And if it makes me feel it I'll use it... "You were posting puke emoji.. | |||
""Body hair provides an ideal environment for lice and other unwanted critters, and can also be a breeding ground for fungal infections, particularly in hot or humid weather." And that's just one.... Just ask any dermatologist and they'll tell you that shaving/waxing/etc is less hygienic than leaving it alone. Or Google it, where you'll find lots of authoritative sources that say the same. It really doesn't matter all that much, because if someone wants to shave/wax/etc then you don't need to justify your preferences (although you could probably keep the puke emoji to yourself..)
Hard to believe this thread is still going but hey ho.
If you've read the whole ridiculous thread you'll have seen I was actually making the case that we each get to choose for ourselves and for our own reasons.
The derailing came when folk tried to say hair or no hair had other connotations.
I did indeed see all of those articles also don't worry.
But basically there's a vast array of reasons arguing both for and against it health wise. It's not 100% either way and we all get to decide for ourselves how clean feels or looks.
And if it makes me feel it I'll use it...
You were posting puke emoji.."Indeed Because I felt it, like I just said If I feel it I'll use it | |||
""Body hair provides an ideal environment for lice and other unwanted critters, and can also be a breeding ground for fungal infections, particularly in hot or humid weather." And that's just one.... Just ask any dermatologist and they'll tell you that shaving/waxing/etc is less hygienic than leaving it alone. Or Google it, where you'll find lots of authoritative sources that say the same. It really doesn't matter all that much, because if someone wants to shave/wax/etc then you don't need to justify your preferences (although you could probably keep the puke emoji to yourself..)
Hard to believe this thread is still going but hey ho.
If you've read the whole ridiculous thread you'll have seen I was actually making the case that we each get to choose for ourselves and for our own reasons.
The derailing came when folk tried to say hair or no hair had other connotations.
I did indeed see all of those articles also don't worry.
But basically there's a vast array of reasons arguing both for and against it health wise. It's not 100% either way and we all get to decide for ourselves how clean feels or looks.
And if it makes me feel it I'll use it...
You were posting puke emoji..
Indeed
Because I felt it, like I just said
If I feel it I'll use it "And calling you out for toxic behaviour is unfair? | |||
""Body hair provides an ideal environment for lice and other unwanted critters, and can also be a breeding ground for fungal infections, particularly in hot or humid weather." And that's just one.... Just ask any dermatologist and they'll tell you that shaving/waxing/etc is less hygienic than leaving it alone. Or Google it, where you'll find lots of authoritative sources that say the same. It really doesn't matter all that much, because if someone wants to shave/wax/etc then you don't need to justify your preferences (although you could probably keep the puke emoji to yourself..)
Hard to believe this thread is still going but hey ho.
If you've read the whole ridiculous thread you'll have seen I was actually making the case that we each get to choose for ourselves and for our own reasons.
The derailing came when folk tried to say hair or no hair had other connotations.
I did indeed see all of those articles also don't worry.
But basically there's a vast array of reasons arguing both for and against it health wise. It's not 100% either way and we all get to decide for ourselves how clean feels or looks.
And if it makes me feel it I'll use it...
You were posting puke emoji..
Indeed
Because I felt it, like I just said
If I feel it I'll use it
And calling you out for toxic behaviour is unfair?"She finds it disgusting presumably, so expressed that sentiment via emoji. Why is that toxic? | |||
""Body hair provides an ideal environment for lice and other unwanted critters, and can also be a breeding ground for fungal infections, particularly in hot or humid weather." And that's just one.... Just ask any dermatologist and they'll tell you that shaving/waxing/etc is less hygienic than leaving it alone. Or Google it, where you'll find lots of authoritative sources that say the same. It really doesn't matter all that much, because if someone wants to shave/wax/etc then you don't need to justify your preferences (although you could probably keep the puke emoji to yourself..)
Hard to believe this thread is still going but hey ho.
If you've read the whole ridiculous thread you'll have seen I was actually making the case that we each get to choose for ourselves and for our own reasons.
The derailing came when folk tried to say hair or no hair had other connotations.
I did indeed see all of those articles also don't worry.
But basically there's a vast array of reasons arguing both for and against it health wise. It's not 100% either way and we all get to decide for ourselves how clean feels or looks.
And if it makes me feel it I'll use it...
You were posting puke emoji..
Indeed
Because I felt it, like I just said
If I feel it I'll use it
And calling you out for toxic behaviour is unfair?"There has been nothing remotely toxic here all day long. Do you object to me having an opinion? Or is it that I'm not bowing to you? Do you want me to cry? Will you stop harping on this if pwomise to cower in a dark corner? What's your aim here? | |||
""Body hair provides an ideal environment for lice and other unwanted critters, and can also be a breeding ground for fungal infections, particularly in hot or humid weather." And that's just one.... Just ask any dermatologist and they'll tell you that shaving/waxing/etc is less hygienic than leaving it alone. Or Google it, where you'll find lots of authoritative sources that say the same. It really doesn't matter all that much, because if someone wants to shave/wax/etc then you don't need to justify your preferences (although you could probably keep the puke emoji to yourself..)
Hard to believe this thread is still going but hey ho.
If you've read the whole ridiculous thread you'll have seen I was actually making the case that we each get to choose for ourselves and for our own reasons.
The derailing came when folk tried to say hair or no hair had other connotations.
I did indeed see all of those articles also don't worry.
But basically there's a vast array of reasons arguing both for and against it health wise. It's not 100% either way and we all get to decide for ourselves how clean feels or looks.
And if it makes me feel it I'll use it...
You were posting puke emoji..
Indeed
Because I felt it, like I just said
If I feel it I'll use it
And calling you out for toxic behaviour is unfair?
She finds it disgusting presumably, so expressed that sentiment via emoji. Why is that toxic? "Thank you | |||
"She finds it disgusting presumably, so expressed that sentiment via emoji. Why is that toxic? " Repeatedly expressing disgust at how some other people look would be considered toxic behaviour. | |||
"She finds it disgusting presumably, so expressed that sentiment via emoji. Why is that toxic? Repeatedly expressing disgust at how some other people look would be considered toxic behaviour." Well its part of an ongoing thread so no, I dont think it would be. Its not like shes going around town screaming out that hairy women are disgusting. Perhaps you could just take the outrage down a notch | |||
"She finds it disgusting presumably, so expressed that sentiment via emoji. Why is that toxic? Repeatedly expressing disgust at how some other people look would be considered toxic behaviour." but is that not the world we made where people can put there beliefs on others you can chose to take that info however you decide its the choice of the reader either end of the argument eg i like fisting girls anus some will think me gross will it mean i wont say it tho no | |||
"She finds it disgusting presumably, so expressed that sentiment via emoji. Why is that toxic? Repeatedly expressing disgust at how some other people look would be considered toxic behaviour." Don’t sweat it, these threads always make great filters. Just rise above it. | |||
"She finds it disgusting presumably, so expressed that sentiment via emoji. Why is that toxic? Repeatedly expressing disgust at how some other people look would be considered toxic behaviour. Don’t sweat it, these threads always make great filters. Just rise above it." this | |||
"She finds it disgusting presumably, so expressed that sentiment via emoji. Why is that toxic? Repeatedly expressing disgust at how some other people look would be considered toxic behaviour. Well its part of an ongoing thread so no, I dont think it would be. Its not like shes going around town screaming out that hairy women are disgusting. Perhaps you could just take the outrage down a notch" You seem to be outraged at me calling someone out for toxic behaviour. Why? Wouldn't people like you consider this white-knighting? She can speak for herself. | |||
"She finds it disgusting presumably, so expressed that sentiment via emoji. Why is that toxic? Repeatedly expressing disgust at how some other people look would be considered toxic behaviour." Usually depends who’s doing it. Male/female. Popular/unpopular
| |||
| |||
"She finds it disgusting presumably, so expressed that sentiment via emoji. Why is that toxic? Repeatedly expressing disgust at how some other people look would be considered toxic behaviour. Well its part of an ongoing thread so no, I dont think it would be. Its not like shes going around town screaming out that hairy women are disgusting. Perhaps you could just take the outrage down a notch You seem to be outraged at me calling someone out for toxic behaviour. Why? Wouldn't people like you consider this white-knighting? She can speak for herself." I can assure you im certainly not outraged. Im fully aware she can speak for herself, shes been doing plenty of it. Im speaking for myself as well. That i happen to be in agreement with her irks you though it seems. | |||
"Omg stop being a bunch of stress heads over nothing "Hand the snickers out | |||
"I can assure you im certainly not outraged." That's what outraged people tend to say.. | |||
| |||
"They're hijacking this to pick a fight out of thin air and don't like that I'm not a soft touch. I can very much speak my mind but I choose not to feed that particular variety of forumite so I'm leaving them be to their superiority complex. It wouldn't matter the content or context they'd spin it back on me somehow or other. I guess it's my bad somehow for being a female with an opinion and a spine.... god knows we're only meant to have one or other of those, the absolute cheek of me... Ah well, there's fresh fun to be had though so why not let this thread die out" Okay, let's agree to disagree: you can express your disgust at other women's bodies and I'll express my disgust at the way you treat other women
Since you're happy for this thread to die out hopefully you'll leave everyone else in peace to enjoy what they enjoy and be who they want to be? Awesome. | |||
"I can assure you im certainly not outraged. That's what outraged people tend to say.." Ah. I see. Thanks for telling me how im feeling anyway. | |||
"They're hijacking this to pick a fight out of thin air and don't like that I'm not a soft touch. I can very much speak my mind but I choose not to feed that particular variety of forumite so I'm leaving them be to their superiority complex. It wouldn't matter the content or context they'd spin it back on me somehow or other. I guess it's my bad somehow for being a female with an opinion and a spine.... god knows we're only meant to have one or other of those, the absolute cheek of me... Ah well, there's fresh fun to be had though so why not let this thread die out Okay, let's agree to disagree: you can express your disgust at other women's bodies and I'll express my disgust at the way you treat other women
Since you're happy for this thread to die out hopefully you'll leave everyone else in peace to enjoy what they enjoy and be who they want to be? Awesome."
Called it | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"They're hijacking this to pick a fight out of thin air and don't like that I'm not a soft touch. I can very much speak my mind but I choose not to feed that particular variety of forumite so I'm leaving them be to their superiority complex. It wouldn't matter the content or context they'd spin it back on me somehow or other. I guess it's my bad somehow for being a female with an opinion and a spine.... god knows we're only meant to have one or other of those, the absolute cheek of me... Ah well, there's fresh fun to be had though so why not let this thread die out" What is unbelievable in your reply and your perspective is that you seem to believe that you are entitled to have your opinion, to state the way you like, using the words you want but it looks like you also believe that it can’t be challenged by others because according to you the only reason they would do it, it is because they feel superior ?! What is even more interesting is that you use the exact same rhetoric used by the poster your criticised and categorised the argument as totally meaningless. Indeed, now you seem to be able to see that if people are challenging your views it is because you are a female with an opinion.. certainly not because ppl are disagreeing with your argument. The solemnly reason of disagreeing with you must be due to the place your hold in society. So if someone states that ‘if a woman is confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals. ‘ That’s total non sense, and to some degree I can get your argument, no all women who doesn’t shave or shave, does it for their own comfort. But that poster was pint pointing how the trend of women being hairless came about and are also sustained in society and it was also valid. If it was a question of comfort only, you wouldn’t be able to see a total dichotomy between genders (of course they will be exceptions, but overall there is a tendency for women to be hairless and men hairy). Nonetheless, you seem to believe that you have the right to use this non sense rhetoric when it fits your argument but not be challenged about it. You can challenge but others can’t. If that is not feeling superior, I don’t know what is. Furthermore describing hairy armpits, pussies and so on as completely disgusting, you underlined yourself as being superior. Hair are ‘rank’ and ‘disgusting’. I am ‘fresher’ and ‘more comfortable on the daily’ (your actual words). If that doesn’t conflate a superiority feeling compared to hairy women, I don’t know what is ? You actually said that you are fresher than non shaved women but ppl challenging your views have a superiority complex! how rich.
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Not mine Dimples, I like some ladies with hair and I like some ladies without hair. I also dislike some ladies with hair and I dislike some ladies without hair. I like or dislike a person because of who they are not how much body hair they have and because I only ever sleep with ladies I like their body hair of lack thereof is irrelevant. To me a ladies personal choice reference body hair is just that, personal and none of my bloody business." | |||
"I like women with hairy armpits. Met quite a few in my circles. Usually I find it’s more younger women though 18-25 with a statement to make. Any woman confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals
Or you know maybe just maybe some of us don’t like the look and feel of a hairy bush or armpits! " | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. " Not mine Dimples, I like some ladies with hair and I like some ladies without hair. I also dislike some ladies with hair and I dislike some ladies without hair. I like or dislike a person because of who they are not how much body hair they have and because I only ever sleep with ladies I like their body hair of lack thereof is irrelevant. To me a ladies personal choice reference body hair is just that, personal and none of my bloody business. What I would be interested in is how many men saying ewwwww to body hair actually have none themselves? Would seem a tad hypocritical to say the least. | |||
 | |||
| |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Moi? Not personally. It just bores me off when people spout nonsense or wokery pokery Even worse if it's hypocritical nonsense and all their own choices are publicly the complete opposite to what they are soapboxing *not you LaLuna" If it bores you, maybe save your time not to read and answer this topic, a click to next page is a better option  | |||
| |||
"Hairy pits and Bush here... "You looked fabulous with your body hairs and I love it and your beauty to be relaxed about it unlike these uptight ladies who make unpleasant comments about it, kudos to you | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Not mine Dimples, I like some ladies with hair and I like some ladies without hair. I also dislike some ladies with hair and I dislike some ladies without hair. I like or dislike a person because of who they are not how much body hair they have and because I only ever sleep with ladies I like their body hair of lack thereof is irrelevant. To me a ladies personal choice reference body hair is just that, personal and none of my bloody business. What I would be interested in is how many men saying ewwwww to body hair actually have none themselves? Would seem a tad hypocritical to say the least." I tend to judge people on either nice or not nice, simple. I'm on a swingers site so looking for NSA sex, which I don't have a problem finding, see my/our verifications. When I meet as a bi lady I'm looking for ladies who I find sexually appealing, not just looks but a sexy personality. Some ladies, shaved, not shaved or somewhere in between, just don't have it, for me anyway and it's not the looks, it how they react to my/our approach. Our first time in Cap D'Agde. Over excited, like a pair of schoolkids, just arrived, shower, too frightened to be naked so no underwear, skimpy summer dress off to the famed Jonny Wokkers bar, walking in at around 6pm it was empty apart from one couple standing at the bar. Up we go, hiya, we've just arrived, it's our first time and we're so excited, isn't it a fab place, how long have you been here? Arrived a few days ago he replied and then turned his back on us. Great start, well maybe they don't fancy us and she looked a miserable cow, maybe it's us. Not the best of starts so we shrugged and had our drinks at one of the outside tables and within a few minutes we smiled and said hiya to another couple walking past and they smiled back and came to chat. We noticed the other couple from time to time during our stay and they both continued to be miserable and she had the sex appeal of a house brick. Did I think at any time is she shaved or not, didn't enter the equation. Ladies, don't ever worry about your preference to shave or not, if your personality oozes sex appeal you'll do just fine. Liz. Xx | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Not mine Dimples, I like some ladies with hair and I like some ladies without hair. I also dislike some ladies with hair and I dislike some ladies without hair. I like or dislike a person because of who they are not how much body hair they have and because I only ever sleep with ladies I like their body hair of lack thereof is irrelevant. To me a ladies personal choice reference body hair is just that, personal and none of my bloody business. What I would be interested in is how many men saying ewwwww to body hair actually have none themselves? Would seem a tad hypocritical to say the least." Thats not hypocritical at all. Women are more than welcome to ewwww about a mans body hair as well if they wish | |||
| |||
| |||
"I love body hair . My pits and bush have their fans. Not for everyone but that's fine by me " | |||
| |||
| |||
"They're hijacking this to pick a fight out of thin air and don't like that I'm not a soft touch. I can very much speak my mind but I choose not to feed that particular variety of forumite so I'm leaving them be to their superiority complex. It wouldn't matter the content or context they'd spin it back on me somehow or other. I guess it's my bad somehow for being a female with an opinion and a spine.... god knows we're only meant to have one or other of those, the absolute cheek of me... Ah well, there's fresh fun to be had though so why not let this thread die out What is unbelievable in your reply and your perspective is that you seem to believe that you are entitled to have your opinion, to state the way you like, using the words you want but it looks like you also believe that it can’t be challenged by others because according to you the only reason they would do it, it is because they feel superior ?! What is even more interesting is that you use the exact same rhetoric used by the poster your criticised and categorised the argument as totally meaningless. Indeed, now you seem to be able to see that if people are challenging your views it is because you are a female with an opinion.. certainly not because ppl are disagreeing with your argument. The solemnly reason of disagreeing with you must be due to the place your hold in society. So if someone states that ‘if a woman is confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals. ‘ That’s total non sense, and to some degree I can get your argument, no all women who doesn’t shave or shave, does it for their own comfort. But that poster was pint pointing how the trend of women being hairless came about and are also sustained in society and it was also valid. If it was a question of comfort only, you wouldn’t be able to see a total dichotomy between genders (of course they will be exceptions, but overall there is a tendency for women to be hairless and men hairy). Nonetheless, you seem to believe that you have the right to use this non sense rhetoric when it fits your argument but not be challenged about it. You can challenge but others can’t. If that is not feeling superior, I don’t know what is. Furthermore describing hairy armpits, pussies and so on as completely disgusting, you underlined yourself as being superior. Hair are ‘rank’ and ‘disgusting’. I am ‘fresher’ and ‘more comfortable on the daily’ (your actual words). If that doesn’t conflate a superiority feeling compared to hairy women, I don’t know what is ? You actually said that you are fresher than non shaved women but ppl challenging your views have a superiority complex! how rich.
"Omw You ramble on and on and on but say nothing of substance One minute you claim I say something Then you admit I didn't 'per se' That's you lying and twisting the thread for clicks Then you accuse me of being superior when all I ever did was say my preference for my own self. The descriptors are how I MYSELF feel if for example I am sick and hair grows etc I use my own words no one elses' Stop attacking me for being honest Stop stating things as fact that are merely your opinion or interpretation You are totally white knighting here and bashing me for standing up for myself You F&B are not the 'nice guy' you pretend to be You are trying to reignite a dead thread for your ego because you didn't get to bash me satisfactorily yesterday Keep going if you want to but I'm not interested in feeding your rampant misogyny | |||
| |||
"Yo it’s all kicked off in here. Anyone got hairy nipples though? " Fab forums are the gift that keeps on giving. The comedy value derived on so many posters here / posts is awesome to see and hairy nipples probably have their own niche I imagine on the hub | |||
| |||
"You are trying to reignite a dead thread for your ego because you didn't get to bash me satisfactorily yesterday Keep going if you want to but I'm not interested in feeding your rampant misogyny "You can't defend your right to express your disgust at other women's bodies and then whine that other people are expressing their disgust at your personality. That's called a double standard. I thought you were done anyway. | |||
"Yo it’s all kicked off in here. Anyone got hairy nipples though? " Do you really think anyone will admit to that on here now Steve?!
| |||
"Yo it’s all kicked off in here. Anyone got hairy nipples though? Fab forums are the gift that keeps on giving. The comedy value derived on so many posters here / posts is awesome to see and hairy nipples probably have their own niche I imagine on the hub "
I’ve never met a woman with hairy nipples and based on this thread I may never. Evil world. | |||
| |||
"Yo it’s all kicked off in here. Anyone got hairy nipples though? Do you really think anyone will admit to that on here now Steve?!
"Genuinely though, if any woman wants to admit to having body hair, my DMs and my legs are open. | |||
"You are trying to reignite a dead thread for your ego because you didn't get to bash me satisfactorily yesterday Keep going if you want to but I'm not interested in feeding your rampant misogyny
You can't defend your right to express your disgust at other women's bodies and then whine that other people are expressing their disgust at your personality. That's called a double standard.
I thought you were done anyway."Oh look Basher #1 is back MY preference for MY body... MY preference for people to live how they preach.... That is all I ever stated So reread the thread if you must But stop claiming I did or said things that did not happen It's all there in black and white above Have a lovely day | |||
" "This you? | |||
"
This you?"Yep, never denied it If I feel it I'll use it sweetie. I don't see you jumping on the GUY above me who used that same emoji... why don't you? Nor do I see you jumping on the GUY who referenced circus performers... why not take offence there? But, you know, hope you feel better for it | |||
| |||
| |||
"
This you?
Yep, never denied it"You were literally just denying it
Nobody else hung around to be an ass except you. And you keep telling us you'll go away but here you are. Could you just go away and let people enjoy what they enjoy please? | |||
"
This you?
Yep, never denied it
You were literally just denying it
Nobody else hung around to be an ass except you. And you keep telling us you'll go away but here you are. Could you just go away and let people enjoy what they enjoy please?"It's getting fun showing your hatefulness up actually. Almost a public service at this point. Show me where I denied using it then hun | |||
| |||
"So reread the thread if you must But stop claiming I did or said things that did not happen It's all there in black and white above" Right here, you were claiming you weren't expressing your disgust at women with body hair. ..you think that hating some women's bodies isn't hate, but calling hateful people out is hate? You realise that makes zero sense, right? If I create another thread for this, are you gonna pollute that with this shite too? | |||
"
This you?
Yep, never denied it
You were literally just denying it
Nobody else hung around to be an ass except you. And you keep telling us you'll go away but here you are. Could you just go away and let people enjoy what they enjoy please?"Thats a bit needlessly aggressive dont you think? | |||
"So reread the thread if you must But stop claiming I did or said things that did not happen It's all there in black and white above Right here, you were claiming you weren't expressing your disgust at women with body hair. ..you think that hating some women's bodies isn't hate, but calling hateful people out is hate? You realise that makes zero sense, right? If I create another thread for this, are you gonna pollute that with this shite too?" I don't see me denying the emoji there Try again Once more with feeling sweetie | |||
"So reread the thread if you must But stop claiming I did or said things that did not happen It's all there in black and white above Right here, you were claiming you weren't expressing your disgust at women with body hair. ..you think that hating some women's bodies isn't hate, but calling hateful people out is hate? You realise that makes zero sense, right? If I create another thread for this, are you gonna pollute that with this shite too?" Firstly, youve pulled a quote from her asking you to stop claiming she said something, which is useless without also quoting what that specific thing was Also, i dont recall anywhere she or anyone else 'hating some womens bodies'. Disgust for hair was expressed, which hardly equates to hating someones body | |||
& 
It’s Sunday! | |||
" &
It’s Sunday! "Trying to, cuppa in hand
| |||
" &
It’s Sunday!
Trying to, cuppa in hand
"Black with two sugars. I’ll be right round! | |||
" &
It’s Sunday!
Trying to, cuppa in hand
Black with two sugars. I’ll be right round! " | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Not mine Dimples, I like some ladies with hair and I like some ladies without hair. I also dislike some ladies with hair and I dislike some ladies without hair. I like or dislike a person because of who they are not how much body hair they have and because I only ever sleep with ladies I like their body hair of lack thereof is irrelevant. To me a ladies personal choice reference body hair is just that, personal and none of my bloody business. What I would be interested in is how many men saying ewwwww to body hair actually have none themselves? Would seem a tad hypocritical to say the least. Thats not hypocritical at all. Women are more than welcome to ewwww about a mans body hair as well if they wish" Not quite what I meant, everybody is entitled to their own opinion (be they male or female). I think I made mine pretty clear in my post. What I was looking at some of the male responders who were busy going ewwww about female body hair but looking at their pictures quite a few of them were pretty hairy themselves. Just seemed a bit hypocritical to me. | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Not mine Dimples, I like some ladies with hair and I like some ladies without hair. I also dislike some ladies with hair and I dislike some ladies without hair. I like or dislike a person because of who they are not how much body hair they have and because I only ever sleep with ladies I like their body hair of lack thereof is irrelevant. To me a ladies personal choice reference body hair is just that, personal and none of my bloody business. What I would be interested in is how many men saying ewwwww to body hair actually have none themselves? Would seem a tad hypocritical to say the least. Thats not hypocritical at all. Women are more than welcome to ewwww about a mans body hair as well if they wish Not quite what I meant, everybody is entitled to their own opinion (be they male or female). I think I made mine pretty clear in my post. What I was looking at some of the male responders who were busy going ewwww about female body hair but looking at their pictures quite a few of them were pretty hairy themselves. Just seemed a bit hypocritical to me." I think it would only be hypocritical if they took offense to women going 'ewww' about their own hair. | |||
"Oh deary me. I think some nerves have been touched. Not mine Dimples, I like some ladies with hair and I like some ladies without hair. I also dislike some ladies with hair and I dislike some ladies without hair. I like or dislike a person because of who they are not how much body hair they have and because I only ever sleep with ladies I like their body hair of lack thereof is irrelevant. To me a ladies personal choice reference body hair is just that, personal and none of my bloody business. What I would be interested in is how many men saying ewwwww to body hair actually have none themselves? Would seem a tad hypocritical to say the least. Thats not hypocritical at all. Women are more than welcome to ewwww about a mans body hair as well if they wish Not quite what I meant, everybody is entitled to their own opinion (be they male or female). I think I made mine pretty clear in my post. What I was looking at some of the male responders who were busy going ewwww about female body hair but looking at their pictures quite a few of them were pretty hairy themselves. Just seemed a bit hypocritical to me. I think it would only be hypocritical if they took offense to women going 'ewww' about their own hair. " Not sure I agree. I think saying ewww about someone else (male or female) having body hair when you yourself have it seems pretty hypocritical to me but hey not going to argue like I said everyone is entitled to their own opinion. And as long as you dont hurt others you should be able to voice that opinion whenever you want. | |||
"They're hijacking this to pick a fight out of thin air and don't like that I'm not a soft touch. I can very much speak my mind but I choose not to feed that particular variety of forumite so I'm leaving them be to their superiority complex. It wouldn't matter the content or context they'd spin it back on me somehow or other. I guess it's my bad somehow for being a female with an opinion and a spine.... god knows we're only meant to have one or other of those, the absolute cheek of me... Ah well, there's fresh fun to be had though so why not let this thread die out What is unbelievable in your reply and your perspective is that you seem to believe that you are entitled to have your opinion, to state the way you like, using the words you want but it looks like you also believe that it can’t be challenged by others because according to you the only reason they would do it, it is because they feel superior ?! What is even more interesting is that you use the exact same rhetoric used by the poster your criticised and categorised the argument as totally meaningless. Indeed, now you seem to be able to see that if people are challenging your views it is because you are a female with an opinion.. certainly not because ppl are disagreeing with your argument. The solemnly reason of disagreeing with you must be due to the place your hold in society. So if someone states that ‘if a woman is confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals. ‘ That’s total non sense, and to some degree I can get your argument, no all women who doesn’t shave or shave, does it for their own comfort. But that poster was pint pointing how the trend of women being hairless came about and are also sustained in society and it was also valid. If it was a question of comfort only, you wouldn’t be able to see a total dichotomy between genders (of course they will be exceptions, but overall there is a tendency for women to be hairless and men hairy). Nonetheless, you seem to believe that you have the right to use this non sense rhetoric when it fits your argument but not be challenged about it. You can challenge but others can’t. If that is not feeling superior, I don’t know what is. Furthermore describing hairy armpits, pussies and so on as completely disgusting, you underlined yourself as being superior. Hair are ‘rank’ and ‘disgusting’. I am ‘fresher’ and ‘more comfortable on the daily’ (your actual words). If that doesn’t conflate a superiority feeling compared to hairy women, I don’t know what is ? You actually said that you are fresher than non shaved women but ppl challenging your views have a superiority complex! how rich.
Omw
You ramble on and on and on but say nothing of substance
One minute you claim I say something
Then you admit I didn't 'per se'
That's you lying and twisting the thread for clicks
Then you accuse me of being superior when all I ever did was say my preference for my own self. The descriptors are how I MYSELF feel if for example I am sick and hair grows etc
I use my own words no one elses'
Stop attacking me for being honest
Stop stating things as fact that are merely your opinion or interpretation
You are totally white knighting here and bashing me for standing up for myself
You F&B are not the 'nice guy' you pretend to be
You are trying to reignite a dead thread for your ego because you didn't get to bash me satisfactorily yesterday
Keep going if you want to but I'm not interested in feeding your rampant misogyny "
. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . . .``~.,
. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-.,
. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:,
. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,
. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./
. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
. . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./
. . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
. . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .}
. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../
. . . .. . .\`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-”
. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\
. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__
,,_. . . . . }.-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,
. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`--==``
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _\. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..`\
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
I guess each to their own on this one, everyone has an opinion and in my view nobody is right, nobody is wrong, it’s just their subjective view!
Anyway in the years to come can we add “are hairy armpits hygienic?” to “is squirting just wee?”, “are curvy ladies are more sexy” and “should trans women compete in sport’ to the list of threads most likely to end up in a bun fight? | |||
| |||
"I love body hair . My pits and bush have their fans. Not for everyone but that's fine by me "i like your bush it tickles on the way in and out | |||
| |||
"I’m a hairy lady. I do alright. "Oh yeah Beautiful | |||
"Hairy pits and Bush here... "Absolutely stunning | |||
"I like women with hairy armpits. Met quite a few in my circles. Usually I find it’s more younger women though 18-25 with a statement to make. Any woman confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals
Or you know maybe just maybe some of us don’t like the look and feel of a hairy bush or armpits!
^^^ a 1000 times this
It's patronising to the nth degree to equate choosing hair to being confident!! Choosing no hair is not because a person is a brainwashed, cowardly social-sheep
Omfg
It's a bit to only see it as a social justice warrior stance
We all make personal hygiene choices for our own selves.
I personally think it's rank and feels eww and sweaty and eww and nope....
Rank, sticky pits with hair plastered down and leg hair that catches against your clothes and hurts if it's pressed against the grain and vaginas that become unruly petri dishes....
Not on my wish list, ever.
But Emmeline Pankhurst's hard work will not be undone if I choose to de-forest my own self and feel fresher and more comfortable on the daily "You're really equating having body hair to being unhygienic? If having armpit hair would make you stinky and rank, that's definitely a you issue. All men don't tend to be rank and stinky and the majority of them have body hair. Public hair actually protects against sti's, thrush and stops sweating down there  | |||
"I like women with hairy armpits. Met quite a few in my circles. Usually I find it’s more younger women though 18-25 with a statement to make. Any woman confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals
Or you know maybe just maybe some of us don’t like the look and feel of a hairy bush or armpits!
^^^ a 1000 times this
It's patronising to the nth degree to equate choosing hair to being confident!! Choosing no hair is not because a person is a brainwashed, cowardly social-sheep
Omfg
It's a bit to only see it as a social justice warrior stance
We all make personal hygiene choices for our own selves.
I personally think it's rank and feels eww and sweaty and eww and nope....
Rank, sticky pits with hair plastered down and leg hair that catches against your clothes and hurts if it's pressed against the grain and vaginas that become unruly petri dishes....
Not on my wish list, ever.
But Emmeline Pankhurst's hard work will not be undone if I choose to de-forest my own self and feel fresher and more comfortable on the daily
You're really equating having body hair to being unhygienic?
If having armpit hair would make you stinky and rank, that's definitely a you issue. All men don't tend to be rank and stinky and the majority of them have body hair.
Public hair actually protects against sti's, thrush and stops sweating down there "Oh Christ! Please don't start it all off again. | |||
"I like women with hairy armpits. Met quite a few in my circles. Usually I find it’s more younger women though 18-25 with a statement to make. Any woman confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals
Or you know maybe just maybe some of us don’t like the look and feel of a hairy bush or armpits!
^^^ a 1000 times this
It's patronising to the nth degree to equate choosing hair to being confident!! Choosing no hair is not because a person is a brainwashed, cowardly social-sheep
Omfg
It's a bit to only see it as a social justice warrior stance
We all make personal hygiene choices for our own selves.
I personally think it's rank and feels eww and sweaty and eww and nope....
Rank, sticky pits with hair plastered down and leg hair that catches against your clothes and hurts if it's pressed against the grain and vaginas that become unruly petri dishes....
Not on my wish list, ever.
But Emmeline Pankhurst's hard work will not be undone if I choose to de-forest my own self and feel fresher and more comfortable on the daily
You're really equating having body hair to being unhygienic?
If having armpit hair would make you stinky and rank, that's definitely a you issue. All men don't tend to be rank and stinky and the majority of them have body hair.
Public hair actually protects against sti's, thrush and stops sweating down there
Oh Christ! Please don't start it all off again."I think you'll find it was you who restarted the thread, yet again. Thank you btw for actually reading my own original comment and not the twisted rewriting that followed. You are 100% correct, it is absolutely a 'ME ISSUE'. My preference, my choice. I never slated the choices of others for their bodies. I never called anyone dirty or disgusting or unhygienic. At no time did I reference other people except to say we all choose for ourselves. I respected other peoples choices here but no one is giving me that same respect just lots of hate. At no time did I hate other people. I said how I FEEL about how hair feels on MY BODY. Are you going to tell me I'm wrong, are you going to tell me I'm not feeling what I'm feeling? Because that'd be a reach. It's clearly become a 'how dare you not want hair' narrative. | |||
"I like women with hairy armpits. Met quite a few in my circles. Usually I find it’s more younger women though 18-25 with a statement to make. Any woman confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals
Or you know maybe just maybe some of us don’t like the look and feel of a hairy bush or armpits!
^^^ a 1000 times this
It's patronising to the nth degree to equate choosing hair to being confident!! Choosing no hair is not because a person is a brainwashed, cowardly social-sheep
Omfg
It's a bit to only see it as a social justice warrior stance
We all make personal hygiene choices for our own selves.
I personally think it's rank and feels eww and sweaty and eww and nope....
Rank, sticky pits with hair plastered down and leg hair that catches against your clothes and hurts if it's pressed against the grain and vaginas that become unruly petri dishes....
Not on my wish list, ever.
But Emmeline Pankhurst's hard work will not be undone if I choose to de-forest my own self and feel fresher and more comfortable on the daily
You're really equating having body hair to being unhygienic?
If having armpit hair would make you stinky and rank, that's definitely a you issue. All men don't tend to be rank and stinky and the majority of them have body hair.
Public hair actually protects against sti's, thrush and stops sweating down there
Oh Christ! Please don't start it all off again.
I think you'll find it was you who restarted the thread, yet again.
Thank you btw for actually reading my own original comment and not the twisted rewriting that followed.
You are 100% correct, it is absolutely a 'ME ISSUE'. My preference, my choice. I never slated the choices of others for their bodies. I never called anyone dirty or disgusting or unhygienic.
At no time did I reference other people except to say we all choose for ourselves.
I respected other peoples choices here but no one is giving me that same respect just lots of hate.
At no time did I hate other people.
I said how I FEEL about how hair feels on MY BODY. Are you going to tell me I'm wrong, are you going to tell me I'm not feeling what I'm feeling? Because that'd be a reach.
It's clearly become a 'how dare you not want hair' narrative.
I'm not going to tell you anything because I have passed no comment on any of your postings.
I merely asked the previous poster not to stir up the hornet's nest that this thread has become.
Well there had been no comments in this since 10pm last night, until you started it up again 2 hours ago.
Perhaps you actually wanted to see the arguing again? "Ok I'm out. I'll leave you all to indulge in your he said she said games. For what it's worth I'm equally fine with armpit hair or not. | |||
"Is it just me or do others find a hairy lady a massive turn on. Sadly very few and far between nowadays. " Ew no | |||
| |||
"Perhaps we should flip the question and ask women what they think about men with hairy armpits instead?" Not a fan of unruly armpits or guys who don’t manscape either! | |||
| |||
"I started to trim mine cause I found deodorant worked better but now I think I might just be a victim of the patriarch. I'm so confused" Watch out for that patriarch...it'll getcha! | |||
"I started to trim mine cause I found deodorant worked better but now I think I might just be a victim of the patriarch. I'm so confused Watch out for that patriarch...it'll getcha! " | |||
"I like women with hairy armpits. Met quite a few in my circles. Usually I find it’s more younger women though 18-25 with a statement to make. Any woman confident enough to go full bush / pits and give zero fucks to the conformity of societal faux standards pushed on them from either men / women , is a hero amongst mortals
Or you know maybe just maybe some of us don’t like the look and feel of a hairy bush or armpits!
^^^ a 1000 times this
It's patronising to the nth degree to equate choosing hair to being confident!! Choosing no hair is not because a person is a brainwashed, cowardly social-sheep
Omfg
It's a bit to only see it as a social justice warrior stance
We all make personal hygiene choices for our own selves.
I personally think it's rank and feels eww and sweaty and eww and nope....
Rank, sticky pits with hair plastered down and leg hair that catches against your clothes and hurts if it's pressed against the grain and vaginas that become unruly petri dishes....
Not on my wish list, ever.
But Emmeline Pankhurst's hard work will not be undone if I choose to de-forest my own self and feel fresher and more comfortable on the daily
You're really equating having body hair to being unhygienic?
If having armpit hair would make you stinky and rank, that's definitely a you issue. All men don't tend to be rank and stinky and the majority of them have body hair.
Public hair actually protects against sti's, thrush and stops sweating down there
Oh Christ! Please don't start it all off again.
I think you'll find it was you who restarted the thread, yet again.
Thank you btw for actually reading my own original comment and not the twisted rewriting that followed.
You are 100% correct, it is absolutely a 'ME ISSUE'. My preference, my choice. I never slated the choices of others for their bodies. I never called anyone dirty or disgusting or unhygienic.
At no time did I reference other people except to say we all choose for ourselves.
I respected other peoples choices here but no one is giving me that same respect just lots of hate.
At no time did I hate other people.
I said how I FEEL about how hair feels on MY BODY. Are you going to tell me I'm wrong, are you going to tell me I'm not feeling what I'm feeling? Because that'd be a reach.
It's clearly become a 'how dare you not want hair' narrative.
"Oh sorry I took your comment to be your opinion on hairy women in general, I wasn't looking to start an argument and I actually do shave myself. I just hate this rhetoric that only hairless women are attractive, it feeds into the narrative that womens bodies are somehow shameful in their natural state, mostly perpetuated by men | |||
" I just hate this rhetoric that only hairless women are attractive, it feeds into the narrative that womens bodies are somehow shameful in their natural state, mostly perpetuated by men " Absolutely this. I honestly don't care if a woman is hairy or smooth as long as that's their choice and they're happy. Day to day I am generally fairly hairy but do shave my legs and armpits when meeting. Not had anyone turn their nose up at my pubes yet. Nita | |||
| |||
| |||
