FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Chris Kaba’s death
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't know all the facts. The car was recognized by the police, I think for a fire arm offence. Why was he in the car in the first place? Did he stop when asked? How was the shot fired? It's really easy to point blame when you don't know the facts" The car was first rammed and then boxed in when he was shot! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. " You can't say that. You may have an opinion but that is all. An armed cop responding to an incident with a car known to have been involved in firearms offence recently...has all sorts of things going through his head. I would imagine the race of the driver matters little in this situation. All the facts aren't known but the family aren't helping by blaming racism. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also shameful that they didn’t inform his family for 11 HOURS! " There are no excuses for this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. You can't say that. You may have an opinion but that is all. An armed cop responding to an incident with a car known to have been involved in firearms offence recently...has all sorts of things going through his head. I would imagine the race of the driver matters little in this situation. All the facts aren't known but the family aren't helping by blaming racism. " She can say that and she did. We know it's just her opinion, no one is under any illusion that anything being said in this thread is undisputable fact It definitely looks like a product of institutional racism though, especially given the Met's murky at best record in this area | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wait for the investigation. A car can be a deadly weapon and we don’t know what exactly happened at the scene. I get the anger I get the distrust whether justice will be done. I was disgusted at Sky saying that perhaps the March were on their way to pay the queen respect. A few minutes on air wouldn’t have gone amiss. " Protesting the death of a Black man following contact with the police is literally the last thing the news really want to be covering right now. And that’s that on that I guess. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. You can't say that. You may have an opinion but that is all. An armed cop responding to an incident with a car known to have been involved in firearms offence recently...has all sorts of things going through his head. I would imagine the race of the driver matters little in this situation. All the facts aren't known but the family aren't helping by blaming racism. She can say that and she did. We know it's just her opinion, no one is under any illusion that anything being said in this thread is undisputable fact It definitely looks like a product of institutional racism though, especially given the Met's murky at best record in this area" Can you tell me how you have drawn that conclusion ? What evidence do you have ? Or is it an assumption based on a perception of the Met ? I am not saying they are innocent...or at least this one officer isn't...but I'd rather assume so until proven guilty. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Conviction for firearms offence. Driving car linked to firearms. Would not stop for police. Rammed police car with police in it when boxed in. I'm pleased the police were not hurt doing their job. Let the investigation take its course." This for me, no one knows the facts at all so leave it to the people to do their jobs and take it where it needs to be a court of law usually. Truths always come out in the end | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wait for the investigation. A car can be a deadly weapon and we don’t know what exactly happened at the scene. I get the anger I get the distrust whether justice will be done. I was disgusted at Sky saying that perhaps the March were on their way to pay the queen respect. A few minutes on air wouldn’t have gone amiss. Protesting the death of a Black man following contact with the police is literally the last thing the news really want to be covering right now. And that’s that on that I guess. " It's frustrating how the news makes it look like nothing has happened in the world the last few days, other than a privileged pensioner dying | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. You can't say that. You may have an opinion but that is all. An armed cop responding to an incident with a car known to have been involved in firearms offence recently...has all sorts of things going through his head. I would imagine the race of the driver matters little in this situation. All the facts aren't known but the family aren't helping by blaming racism. She can say that and she did. We know it's just her opinion, no one is under any illusion that anything being said in this thread is undisputable fact It definitely looks like a product of institutional racism though, especially given the Met's murky at best record in this area Can you tell me how you have drawn that conclusion ? What evidence do you have ? Or is it an assumption based on a perception of the Met ? I am not saying they are innocent...or at least this one officer isn't...but I'd rather assume so until proven guilty. " But you're not willing to assume the unarmed victim was innocent, ok | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Conviction for firearms offence. Driving car linked to firearms. Would not stop for police. Rammed police car with police in it when boxed in. I'm pleased the police were not hurt doing their job. Let the investigation take its course. This for me, no one knows the facts at all so leave it to the people to do their jobs and take it where it needs to be a court of law usually. Truths always come out in the end " The truth does not always come out in court at least. As Black communities know from previous police cover ups. Maybe in 15 years we’ll get an apology if they did wrong though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. You can't say that. You may have an opinion but that is all. An armed cop responding to an incident with a car known to have been involved in firearms offence recently...has all sorts of things going through his head. I would imagine the race of the driver matters little in this situation. All the facts aren't known but the family aren't helping by blaming racism. She can say that and she did. We know it's just her opinion, no one is under any illusion that anything being said in this thread is undisputable fact It definitely looks like a product of institutional racism though, especially given the Met's murky at best record in this area Can you tell me how you have drawn that conclusion ? What evidence do you have ? Or is it an assumption based on a perception of the Met ? I am not saying they are innocent...or at least this one officer isn't...but I'd rather assume so until proven guilty. But you're not willing to assume the unarmed victim was innocent, ok " Well technically the victim isnt subject to any investigation, hence does not require any presumption of innocence | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. You can't say that. You may have an opinion but that is all. An armed cop responding to an incident with a car known to have been involved in firearms offence recently...has all sorts of things going through his head. I would imagine the race of the driver matters little in this situation. All the facts aren't known but the family aren't helping by blaming racism. She can say that and she did. We know it's just her opinion, no one is under any illusion that anything being said in this thread is undisputable fact It definitely looks like a product of institutional racism though, especially given the Met's murky at best record in this area Can you tell me how you have drawn that conclusion ? What evidence do you have ? Or is it an assumption based on a perception of the Met ? I am not saying they are innocent...or at least this one officer isn't...but I'd rather assume so until proven guilty. But you're not willing to assume the unarmed victim was innocent, ok " He may have been. Let's investigate and save uninformed guesses that just inflame the situation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't know all the facts. The car was recognized by the police, I think for a fire arm offence. Why was he in the car in the first place? Did he stop when asked? How was the shot fired? It's really easy to point blame when you don't know the facts" I'd want to know all this. Also the Met are dodgy AF, like they're a whole separate entity from the rest of the police. Also why don't they taser or shoot to incapacitate/wound, instead of kill? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Conviction for firearms offence. Driving car linked to firearms. Would not stop for police. Rammed police car with police in it when boxed in. I'm pleased the police were not hurt doing their job. Let the investigation take its course." My Dad received an official letter from a UK Police force (not his local force), saying a car that he was insured on had been involved in a crime and further action would be taken. My Dad, 82 at the time and with dementia, had not driven for a couple of years and had no vehicle. The vehicle he is alleged to have insured was a vehicle he'd never, ever owned and the region the police force represented is somewhere he's not visited for decades. Turns out someone had stolen my Dad's identity and had insured vans, cars etc in his name. These vehicles were used to commit crime then dumped. The point being that it's perfectly possible for an innocent person to become unwittingly embroiled in vehicles or ANPR tags for alleged illegal activity. My Dad is white and elderly, so maybe they'd have spoken to him before shooting? Who knows? The person in the car is not always the owner and just because someone's name is associated with a vehicle does not mean they actually have anything to do with it. I shall reserve further judgment/comment beyond this. And for the person asking about body worn cameras, yes, the family are asking for this to be released and also footage from a Police helicopter involved. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. You can't say that. You may have an opinion but that is all. An armed cop responding to an incident with a car known to have been involved in firearms offence recently...has all sorts of things going through his head. I would imagine the race of the driver matters little in this situation. All the facts aren't known but the family aren't helping by blaming racism. She can say that and she did. We know it's just her opinion, no one is under any illusion that anything being said in this thread is undisputable fact It definitely looks like a product of institutional racism though, especially given the Met's murky at best record in this area Can you tell me how you have drawn that conclusion ? What evidence do you have ? Or is it an assumption based on a perception of the Met ? I am not saying they are innocent...or at least this one officer isn't...but I'd rather assume so until proven guilty. But you're not willing to assume the unarmed victim was innocent, ok " I am not assuming anything. I know the victim did not have a gun. I know he was shot. Another wasted life. Which is sad. Did his actions lead to his being shot ? Did the officer make a terrible error of judgement? Or did he want to kill the victim? I don't know, but I am assuming that the law abiding Police don't go round shooting people unjustifiably. I will adjust my assumptions as the facts come out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. You can't say that. You may have an opinion but that is all. An armed cop responding to an incident with a car known to have been involved in firearms offence recently...has all sorts of things going through his head. I would imagine the race of the driver matters little in this situation. All the facts aren't known but the family aren't helping by blaming racism. She can say that and she did. We know it's just her opinion, no one is under any illusion that anything being said in this thread is undisputable fact It definitely looks like a product of institutional racism though, especially given the Met's murky at best record in this area Can you tell me how you have drawn that conclusion ? What evidence do you have ? Or is it an assumption based on a perception of the Met ? I am not saying they are innocent...or at least this one officer isn't...but I'd rather assume so until proven guilty. But you're not willing to assume the unarmed victim was innocent, ok I am not assuming anything. I know the victim did not have a gun. I know he was shot. Another wasted life. Which is sad. Did his actions lead to his being shot ? Did the officer make a terrible error of judgement? Or did he want to kill the victim? I don't know, but I am assuming that the law abiding Police don't go round shooting people unjustifiably. I will adjust my assumptions as the facts come out. " the facts is what everyone should make sure they focus on such as the car was known for recent fire arms offences and did not stop when it was requested too and the driver was subsequently shot and died. They are all the facts we know right now. I think claiming it was a racist killing is not a fact and those comments should be withheld until it is known that is the case. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. You can't say that. You may have an opinion but that is all. An armed cop responding to an incident with a car known to have been involved in firearms offence recently...has all sorts of things going through his head. I would imagine the race of the driver matters little in this situation. All the facts aren't known but the family aren't helping by blaming racism. " Hence I think. But thank you for allowing me an opinion. Very gracious. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am not assuming anything. I know the victim did not have a gun. I know he was shot. Another wasted life. Which is sad. Did his actions lead to his being shot ? Did the officer make a terrible error of judgement? Or did he want to kill the victim? I don't know, but I am assuming that the law abiding Police don't go round shooting people unjustifiably. I will adjust my assumptions as the facts come out. the facts is what everyone should make sure they focus on such as the car was known for recent fire arms offences and did not stop when it was requested too and the driver was subsequently shot and died. They are all the facts we know right now. I think claiming it was a racist killing is not a fact and those comments should be withheld until it is known that is the case. " I can’t speak for everyone here but I can say that acknowledging the way that race seems to impact the use of force (be it by taser or other) does not mean that every murder of a Black man is racist or that officers maliciously go out to harm Black people (unless Liam Neeson works for them). It’s interesting, actually that’s not the word but it’s something, that race seems to impact your interactions with the police he it how much more likely you are to interact with them willingly or unwillingly and also the outcomes of those interactions. We don’t know that this case was racist, no. But it does force us to remember the way that the met interact with Black people today and how they have historically as well as the fact that in almost All cases over say, the last seven decades, never resulting in any kind of ‘Justice’ that grieving families would be happy with (officers in prison for the fact a family have lost a life). Possibly an emotive response here but I do think that’s what is often meant when considering race in these incidents. Not that the officer was Liam Neeeson. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Conviction for firearms offence. Driving car linked to firearms. Would not stop for police. Rammed police car with police in it when boxed in. I'm pleased the police were not hurt doing their job. Let the investigation take its course. My Dad received an official letter from a UK Police force (not his local force), saying a car that he was insured on had been involved in a crime and further action would be taken. My Dad, 82 at the time and with dementia, had not driven for a couple of years and had no vehicle. The vehicle he is alleged to have insured was a vehicle he'd never, ever owned and the region the police force represented is somewhere he's not visited for decades. Turns out someone had stolen my Dad's identity and had insured vans, cars etc in his name. These vehicles were used to commit crime then dumped. The point being that it's perfectly possible for an innocent person to become unwittingly embroiled in vehicles or ANPR tags for alleged illegal activity. My Dad is white and elderly, so maybe they'd have spoken to him before shooting? Who knows? The person in the car is not always the owner and just because someone's name is associated with a vehicle does not mean they actually have anything to do with it. I shall reserve further judgment/comment beyond this. And for the person asking about body worn cameras, yes, the family are asking for this to be released and also footage from a Police helicopter involved. " If your Dad had stopped when asked rather than drive off at high speed then rammed a police car, of course he would not have been shot! Thousands of people of every age and race are stopped every day by the police. Police fatal shootings average 2 a year. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am not assuming anything. I know the victim did not have a gun. I know he was shot. Another wasted life. Which is sad. Did his actions lead to his being shot ? Did the officer make a terrible error of judgement? Or did he want to kill the victim? I don't know, but I am assuming that the law abiding Police don't go round shooting people unjustifiably. I will adjust my assumptions as the facts come out. the facts is what everyone should make sure they focus on such as the car was known for recent fire arms offences and did not stop when it was requested too and the driver was subsequently shot and died. They are all the facts we know right now. I think claiming it was a racist killing is not a fact and those comments should be withheld until it is known that is the case. I can’t speak for everyone here but I can say that acknowledging the way that race seems to impact the use of force (be it by taser or other) does not mean that every murder of a Black man is racist or that officers maliciously go out to harm Black people (unless Liam Neeson works for them). It’s interesting, actually that’s not the word but it’s something, that race seems to impact your interactions with the police he it how much more likely you are to interact with them willingly or unwillingly and also the outcomes of those interactions. We don’t know that this case was racist, no. But it does force us to remember the way that the met interact with Black people today and how they have historically as well as the fact that in almost All cases over say, the last seven decades, never resulting in any kind of ‘Justice’ that grieving families would be happy with (officers in prison for the fact a family have lost a life). Possibly an emotive response here but I do think that’s what is often meant when considering race in these incidents. Not that the officer was Liam Neeeson. " Im not sure why you need to drag liam neesons name through the mud to be honest. We're all familiar with that interview and i dont think anybody seriously thinks the man has a racist bone in his body. Unnecessary to bring him into this i think | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. " The police have shot plenty of white men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Conviction for firearms offence. Driving car linked to firearms. Would not stop for police. Rammed police car with police in it when boxed in. I'm pleased the police were not hurt doing their job. Let the investigation take its course. My Dad received an official letter from a UK Police force (not his local force), saying a car that he was insured on had been involved in a crime and further action would be taken. My Dad, 82 at the time and with dementia, had not driven for a couple of years and had no vehicle. The vehicle he is alleged to have insured was a vehicle he'd never, ever owned and the region the police force represented is somewhere he's not visited for decades. Turns out someone had stolen my Dad's identity and had insured vans, cars etc in his name. These vehicles were used to commit crime then dumped. The point being that it's perfectly possible for an innocent person to become unwittingly embroiled in vehicles or ANPR tags for alleged illegal activity. My Dad is white and elderly, so maybe they'd have spoken to him before shooting? Who knows? The person in the car is not always the owner and just because someone's name is associated with a vehicle does not mean they actually have anything to do with it. I shall reserve further judgment/comment beyond this. And for the person asking about body worn cameras, yes, the family are asking for this to be released and also footage from a Police helicopter involved. If your Dad had stopped when asked rather than drive off at high speed then rammed a police car, of course he would not have been shot! Thousands of people of every age and race are stopped every day by the police. Police fatal shootings average 2 a year." Honestly, if a police officer had somehow ID'd my Dad and tried to stop him or speak to him in his current state, I can't guarantee he'd cooperate. He's deaf, he has dementia, he can't follow a sequence of instructions and he would always assume he's done nothing wrong (because that's true) and so likely to think that the sirens/shouting or whatever, related to someone else. My Dad currently struggles to understand the rules of queuing in a shop or that you can't just decide to turn up somewhere and expect an appointment immediately, so it's actually possible he'd initially get himself into trouble if police told him to do XYZ. He probably wouldn't have been driving a vehicle because we confiscated his car but actually, his license still exists (I don't have the power to revoke it) so he could theoretically still hire a car, if someone is daft enough to do that for him. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Im not sure why you need to drag liam neesons name through the mud to be honest. We're all familiar with that interview and i dont think anybody seriously thinks the man has a racist bone in his body. Unnecessary to bring him into this i think " ‘Anybody’, as in any single person, feels like a stretch. But without derailing the thread further than you chose to, I’ll just clarify that my use of him was in the context of- no, I don’t think many officers go out looking for a Black man to start violence with as Neeson was that night. I thought it a good example actually. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. " I think it’s probably an assessment that could even be supported by statistics on use of force against Black men. But I feel pain at the thought of what they are going through right now. And the way they’ve been dealt with by the police. At least I feel that if their son was White, that they’d have known about his death sooner. But of course that’s just my opinion before anyone jumps on me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also shameful that they didn’t inform his family for 11 HOURS! " Feels very Mark Duggan does that part. There’s at least some consistency from them there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am seriously not holding out hope that the investigation concludes anything but a lawful killing because in all honesty I think in my lifetime, of all the Black men I’ve heard about that died following contact with the police in the UK, not a single officer has been charged. But I can’t help but feel like one has to be more hopeful and ultimately more trusting in the police than I am. I just can’t help but notice the way that interactions with the police go for Black men in comparison to men of all other races. That feels… alarming? Well unless you suggest or believe that Black men are more this or that I guess… " In London there seems to be a big gang culture among young black youths. Therefore you act like a gangster you get treated like one. Though I would say it is a small minority are in gangs but they're the "interesting" ones killing each other and singing and rapping about killing each other. The gangs tend to hate the policy, probably with reason, so policing in areas with a lot of black people will be difficult. It's shite and should not be happening but until something changes this will not be the last death. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am seriously not holding out hope that the investigation concludes anything but a lawful killing because in all honesty I think in my lifetime, of all the Black men I’ve heard about that died following contact with the police in the UK, not a single officer has been charged. But I can’t help but feel like one has to be more hopeful and ultimately more trusting in the police than I am. I just can’t help but notice the way that interactions with the police go for Black men in comparison to men of all other races. That feels… alarming? Well unless you suggest or believe that Black men are more this or that I guess… In London there seems to be a big gang culture among young black youths. Therefore you act like a gangster you get treated like one. Though I would say it is a small minority are in gangs but they're the "interesting" ones killing each other and singing and rapping about killing each other. The gangs tend to hate the policy, probably with reason, so policing in areas with a lot of black people will be difficult. It's shite and should not be happening but until something changes this will not be the last death. " As someone that’s never been in a gang, went to school, got good grades, went to uni and now works full time but has also been stopped by the police I can truly say that even not acting like a gangster is little help tbh. Plus, the overpolicing of Black communities is not done with view of helping or protecting those communities. It also is a hostile relationship particularly in places like Tottenham for example and other heavily Black populated areas in London given the historical relationship the police have created themselves through murder and other racist behaviours. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Under what circumstances is a met officer allowed to fire shots? Were those circumstances in effect during this incident? If not, then it’s potentially murder imo. I don’t care who was ramming who in what vehicle nor what any person driving had been charged with previously. If there was not just cause to fire shots then shots should not have been fired. " Hence... Wait for the investigation. Then someone will know. At the moment it's mostly guesswork and some of it is very unhelpful and inflammatory | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Under what circumstances is a met officer allowed to fire shots? Were those circumstances in effect during this incident? If not, then it’s potentially murder imo. I don’t care who was ramming who in what vehicle nor what any person driving had been charged with previously. If there was not just cause to fire shots then shots should not have been fired. " if a vehicle is being used as a weapon is that just cause to protect yourself and fire a shot or should you leave yourself open to be murdered? This is the choice a officer may have to make | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am seriously not holding out hope that the investigation concludes anything but a lawful killing because in all honesty I think in my lifetime, of all the Black men I’ve heard about that died following contact with the police in the UK, not a single officer has been charged. But I can’t help but feel like one has to be more hopeful and ultimately more trusting in the police than I am. I just can’t help but notice the way that interactions with the police go for Black men in comparison to men of all other races. That feels… alarming? Well unless you suggest or believe that Black men are more this or that I guess… In London there seems to be a big gang culture among young black youths. Therefore you act like a gangster you get treated like one. Though I would say it is a small minority are in gangs but they're the "interesting" ones killing each other and singing and rapping about killing each other. The gangs tend to hate the policy, probably with reason, so policing in areas with a lot of black people will be difficult. It's shite and should not be happening but until something changes this will not be the last death. " There's a massive gang culture up north too, with lots of recent firearms incidents in Liverpool recently, for example. The protagonists appear to be white in these cases. We don't seem to have to same sort of rate of police-initiated shootings (of people of any race or colour). I don't know whether that means anything or not, but northern white gangs seem to be going on the offensive again, in Salford, Liverpool and other places. We've had a spell with much less gang related violence up here. Or at least that's what it feels like. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am seriously not holding out hope that the investigation concludes anything but a lawful killing because in all honesty I think in my lifetime, of all the Black men I’ve heard about that died following contact with the police in the UK, not a single officer has been charged. But I can’t help but feel like one has to be more hopeful and ultimately more trusting in the police than I am. I just can’t help but notice the way that interactions with the police go for Black men in comparison to men of all other races. That feels… alarming? Well unless you suggest or believe that Black men are more this or that I guess… In London there seems to be a big gang culture among young black youths. Therefore you act like a gangster you get treated like one. Though I would say it is a small minority are in gangs but they're the "interesting" ones killing each other and singing and rapping about killing each other. The gangs tend to hate the policy, probably with reason, so policing in areas with a lot of black people will be difficult. It's shite and should not be happening but until something changes this will not be the last death. As someone that’s never been in a gang, went to school, got good grades, went to uni and now works full time but has also been stopped by the police I can truly say that even not acting like a gangster is little help tbh. Plus, the overpolicing of Black communities is not done with view of helping or protecting those communities. It also is a hostile relationship particularly in places like Tottenham for example and other heavily Black populated areas in London given the historical relationship the police have created themselves through murder and other racist behaviours. " I did all of those and over the years have been stopped by the police on many occasions many occasions I’ve been searched. Guess what I just got on and cooperated | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am seriously not holding out hope that the investigation concludes anything but a lawful killing because in all honesty I think in my lifetime, of all the Black men I’ve heard about that died following contact with the police in the UK, not a single officer has been charged. But I can’t help but feel like one has to be more hopeful and ultimately more trusting in the police than I am. I just can’t help but notice the way that interactions with the police go for Black men in comparison to men of all other races. That feels… alarming? Well unless you suggest or believe that Black men are more this or that I guess… In London there seems to be a big gang culture among young black youths. Therefore you act like a gangster you get treated like one. Though I would say it is a small minority are in gangs but they're the "interesting" ones killing each other and singing and rapping about killing each other. The gangs tend to hate the policy, probably with reason, so policing in areas with a lot of black people will be difficult. It's shite and should not be happening but until something changes this will not be the last death. As someone that’s never been in a gang, went to school, got good grades, went to uni and now works full time but has also been stopped by the police I can truly say that even not acting like a gangster is little help tbh. Plus, the overpolicing of Black communities is not done with view of helping or protecting those communities. It also is a hostile relationship particularly in places like Tottenham for example and other heavily Black populated areas in London given the historical relationship the police have created themselves through murder and other racist behaviours. " I know that but the decent ones don't get the attention. They're just normal if you get me. I've been stop and searched loads over the years, had to fill in forms when travelling to the mainland. Just because of where I was from and who I grew up with. Even TV programs made by black people just show the bad aspects and shite music*. This isn't something that will change soon, if ever. Unfortunately. *By shite music I mean rap and soul and funky. Not trying to be offensive just how I see it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am seriously not holding out hope that the investigation concludes anything but a lawful killing because in all honesty I think in my lifetime, of all the Black men I’ve heard about that died following contact with the police in the UK, not a single officer has been charged. But I can’t help but feel like one has to be more hopeful and ultimately more trusting in the police than I am. I just can’t help but notice the way that interactions with the police go for Black men in comparison to men of all other races. That feels… alarming? Well unless you suggest or believe that Black men are more this or that I guess… In London there seems to be a big gang culture among young black youths. Therefore you act like a gangster you get treated like one. Though I would say it is a small minority are in gangs but they're the "interesting" ones killing each other and singing and rapping about killing each other. The gangs tend to hate the policy, probably with reason, so policing in areas with a lot of black people will be difficult. It's shite and should not be happening but until something changes this will not be the last death. There's a massive gang culture up north too, with lots of recent firearms incidents in Liverpool recently, for example. The protagonists appear to be white in these cases. We don't seem to have to same sort of rate of police-initiated shootings (of people of any race or colour). I don't know whether that means anything or not, but northern white gangs seem to be going on the offensive again, in Salford, Liverpool and other places. We've had a spell with much less gang related violence up here. Or at least that's what it feels like. " Really? The main gangs up north shooting people aren't white. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am seriously not holding out hope that the investigation concludes anything but a lawful killing because in all honesty I think in my lifetime, of all the Black men I’ve heard about that died following contact with the police in the UK, not a single officer has been charged. But I can’t help but feel like one has to be more hopeful and ultimately more trusting in the police than I am. I just can’t help but notice the way that interactions with the police go for Black men in comparison to men of all other races. That feels… alarming? Well unless you suggest or believe that Black men are more this or that I guess… In London there seems to be a big gang culture among young black youths. Therefore you act like a gangster you get treated like one. Though I would say it is a small minority are in gangs but they're the "interesting" ones killing each other and singing and rapping about killing each other. The gangs tend to hate the policy, probably with reason, so policing in areas with a lot of black people will be difficult. It's shite and should not be happening but until something changes this will not be the last death. There's a massive gang culture up north too, with lots of recent firearms incidents in Liverpool recently, for example. The protagonists appear to be white in these cases. We don't seem to have to same sort of rate of police-initiated shootings (of people of any race or colour). I don't know whether that means anything or not, but northern white gangs seem to be going on the offensive again, in Salford, Liverpool and other places. We've had a spell with much less gang related violence up here. Or at least that's what it feels like. Really? The main gangs up north shooting people aren't white. " The people suspected of the recent spate of shootings in Liverpool are white and this has also been the case in historic shootings too. The gangs that still run semi riot in parts of Salford and who committed several very well publicised shootings are and were white. Check out Paul Massey and the Noonan family, for starters. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" In London there seems to be a big gang culture among young black youths. Therefore you act like a gangster you get treated like one. Though I would say it is a small minority are in gangs but they're the "interesting" ones killing each other and singing and rapping about killing each other. The gangs tend to hate the policy, probably with reason, so policing in areas with a lot of black people will be difficult. It's shite and should not be happening but until something changes this will not be the last death. As someone that’s never been in a gang, went to school, got good grades, went to uni and now works full time but has also been stopped by the police I can truly say that even not acting like a gangster is little help tbh. Plus, the overpolicing of Black communities is not done with view of helping or protecting those communities. It also is a hostile relationship particularly in places like Tottenham for example and other heavily Black populated areas in London given the historical relationship the police have created themselves through murder and other racist behaviours. I did all of those and over the years have been stopped by the police on many occasions many occasions I’ve been searched. Guess what I just got on and cooperated " Where did I say I didn’t co-operate? Or is this at those that resist this form of policing? Tbh I think for many, when it’s bordering on harassment, being stopped multiple times a day and or week and it affects your life, it’s fair to grow frustrated and fed up. Particularly because this form of policing is targeted at specific racial groups more than others. Particularly because these stops of those discussed racial groups are more likely to include the use of force and also because young people from those communities are extremely aware of what interactions with police officers tend to lead to. Wonderful that it didn’t bother you but given that this policing has been criticised by so many people and even a former (Tory lol) PM, I do actually think criticism of it it at least its implementation is fair and valid. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am seriously not holding out hope that the investigation concludes anything but a lawful killing because in all honesty I think in my lifetime, of all the Black men I’ve heard about that died following contact with the police in the UK, not a single officer has been charged. But I can’t help but feel like one has to be more hopeful and ultimately more trusting in the police than I am. I just can’t help but notice the way that interactions with the police go for Black men in comparison to men of all other races. That feels… alarming? Well unless you suggest or believe that Black men are more this or that I guess… In London there seems to be a big gang culture among young black youths. Therefore you act like a gangster you get treated like one. Though I would say it is a small minority are in gangs but they're the "interesting" ones killing each other and singing and rapping about killing each other. The gangs tend to hate the policy, probably with reason, so policing in areas with a lot of black people will be difficult. It's shite and should not be happening but until something changes this will not be the last death. There's a massive gang culture up north too, with lots of recent firearms incidents in Liverpool recently, for example. The protagonists appear to be white in these cases. We don't seem to have to same sort of rate of police-initiated shootings (of people of any race or colour). I don't know whether that means anything or not, but northern white gangs seem to be going on the offensive again, in Salford, Liverpool and other places. We've had a spell with much less gang related violence up here. Or at least that's what it feels like. Really? The main gangs up north shooting people aren't white. The people suspected of the recent spate of shootings in Liverpool are white and this has also been the case in historic shootings too. The gangs that still run semi riot in parts of Salford and who committed several very well publicised shootings are and were white. Check out Paul Massey and the Noonan family, for starters. " The noonans were absolute scum. Rapists and murderers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Conviction for firearms offence. Driving car linked to firearms. Would not stop for police. Rammed police car with police in it when boxed in. I'm pleased the police were not hurt doing their job. Let the investigation take its course. This for me, no one knows the facts at all so leave it to the people to do their jobs and take it where it needs to be a court of law usually. Truths always come out in the end " Well said , don’t get bogged down with the scum of the press | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I know that but the decent ones don't get the attention. They're just normal if you get me. I've been stop and searched loads over the years, had to fill in forms when travelling to the mainland. Just because of where I was from and who I grew up with. Even TV programs made by black people just show the bad aspects and shite music*. This isn't something that will change soon, if ever. Unfortunately. *By shite music I mean rap and soul and funky. Not trying to be offensive just how I see it. " I think this discussion has been good. I respectfully disagree with some of the points made and whose responsibility it is to change the relationship between police and community for the better. I know you don’t mean to offend and thank you, honestly, for that. We’re off topic quite a bit now and I’ve participated in that tbf but I am pretty keen to get back to the OP | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It seems the car wasn’t his I wonder if he had insurance and a license why haven’t these details been released yet " Are they relevant to his subsequent death? That’s a genuine question by the way- I’m aware when typed things come off differently. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Conviction for firearms offence. Driving car linked to firearms. Would not stop for police. Rammed police car with police in it when boxed in. I'm pleased the police were not hurt doing their job. Let the investigation take its course. This for me, no one knows the facts at all so leave it to the people to do their jobs and take it where it needs to be a court of law usually. Truths always come out in the end Well said , don’t get bogged down with the scum of the press " Ah. Fancy seeing you guys here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am seriously not holding out hope that the investigation concludes anything but a lawful killing because in all honesty I think in my lifetime, of all the Black men I’ve heard about that died following contact with the police in the UK, not a single officer has been charged. But I can’t help but feel like one has to be more hopeful and ultimately more trusting in the police than I am. I just can’t help but notice the way that interactions with the police go for Black men in comparison to men of all other races. That feels… alarming? Well unless you suggest or believe that Black men are more this or that I guess… In London there seems to be a big gang culture among young black youths. Therefore you act like a gangster you get treated like one. Though I would say it is a small minority are in gangs but they're the "interesting" ones killing each other and singing and rapping about killing each other. The gangs tend to hate the policy, probably with reason, so policing in areas with a lot of black people will be difficult. It's shite and should not be happening but until something changes this will not be the last death. There's a massive gang culture up north too, with lots of recent firearms incidents in Liverpool recently, for example. The protagonists appear to be white in these cases. We don't seem to have to same sort of rate of police-initiated shootings (of people of any race or colour). I don't know whether that means anything or not, but northern white gangs seem to be going on the offensive again, in Salford, Liverpool and other places. We've had a spell with much less gang related violence up here. Or at least that's what it feels like. Really? The main gangs up north shooting people aren't white. The people suspected of the recent spate of shootings in Liverpool are white and this has also been the case in historic shootings too. The gangs that still run semi riot in parts of Salford and who committed several very well publicised shootings are and were white. Check out Paul Massey and the Noonan family, for starters. The noonans were absolute scum. Rapists and murderers. " From the Liverpool Echo newspaper about the relatively recent actions of gangs in the North, linked to Massey and Noonans et.al. This is almost certainly ongoing and involves many NW towns/cities. https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/gangs-behind-murders-john-kinsella-19273984.amp | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It seems the car wasn’t his I wonder if he had insurance and a license why haven’t these details been released yet Are they relevant to his subsequent death? That’s a genuine question by the way- I’m aware when typed things come off differently. " I’m sure it’s relevant to the investigation and why not release the details in regards to insurance license etc etc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Under what circumstances is a met officer allowed to fire shots? Were those circumstances in effect during this incident? If not, then it’s potentially murder imo. I don’t care who was ramming who in what vehicle nor what any person driving had been charged with previously. If there was not just cause to fire shots then shots should not have been fired. Hence... Wait for the investigation. Then someone will know. At the moment it's mostly guesswork and some of it is very unhelpful and inflammatory" I just want to stress that the point of this thread was not to solve the murder. Even if it has become that. It was more a ‘am I going mad?’ Because it’s obviously been lost in the news (understandable I guess). And also I wanted to gain the perspectives of people of whether protestors are being heard? What kinds of feelings has this incident brought up for people? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It seems the car wasn’t his I wonder if he had insurance and a license why haven’t these details been released yet Are they relevant to his subsequent death? That’s a genuine question by the way- I’m aware when typed things come off differently. I’m sure it’s relevant to the investigation and why not release the details in regards to insurance license etc etc " Relevant I guess to the stop. Though I don’t think relevant to whether or not lethal force should or shouldn’t have been applied. And I don’t think releasing it does any good to finding out whether he was killed lawfully or not, maybe just about whether he was breaking the law that is not punishable by death. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Under what circumstances is a met officer allowed to fire shots? Were those circumstances in effect during this incident? If not, then it’s potentially murder imo. I don’t care who was ramming who in what vehicle nor what any person driving had been charged with previously. If there was not just cause to fire shots then shots should not have been fired. Hence... Wait for the investigation. Then someone will know. At the moment it's mostly guesswork and some of it is very unhelpful and inflammatory I just want to stress that the point of this thread was not to solve the murder. Even if it has become that. It was more a ‘am I going mad?’ Because it’s obviously been lost in the news (understandable I guess). And also I wanted to gain the perspectives of people of whether protestors are being heard? What kinds of feelings has this incident brought up for people? " I had heard nothing about the case here. Whilst not every murder in the UK would make it on the news here. A price shooting sparking protests usually would. As a disclaimer I haven't actually consumed much media news this week so it may have been reported but certainly not to the degree previous incidents would have been. I've no idea about the specifics of the case but it's shot you feel so deflated as I'm sure so many of your peers do. Regardless of the specifics and outcome of this case there is clear justified mistrust of the authorities which is a viscous cycle on both sides. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I had heard nothing about the case here. Whilst not every murder in the UK would make it on the news here. A price shooting sparking protests usually would. As a disclaimer I haven't actually consumed much media news this week so it may have been reported but certainly not to the degree previous incidents would have been. I've no idea about the specifics of the case but it's shot you feel so deflated as I'm sure so many of your peers do. Regardless of the specifics and outcome of this case there is clear justified mistrust of the authorities which is a viscous cycle on both sides. " I do always appreciate your comments in threads, Cork! Thank you & | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Under what circumstances is a met officer allowed to fire shots? Were those circumstances in effect during this incident? If not, then it’s potentially murder imo. I don’t care who was ramming who in what vehicle nor what any person driving had been charged with previously. If there was not just cause to fire shots then shots should not have been fired. Hence... Wait for the investigation. Then someone will know. At the moment it's mostly guesswork and some of it is very unhelpful and inflammatory I just want to stress that the point of this thread was not to solve the murder. Even if it has become that. It was more a ‘am I going mad?’ Because it’s obviously been lost in the news (understandable I guess). And also I wanted to gain the perspectives of people of whether protestors are being heard? What kinds of feelings has this incident brought up for people? I had heard nothing about the case here. Whilst not every murder in the UK would make it on the news here. A price shooting sparking protests usually would. As a disclaimer I haven't actually consumed much media news this week so it may have been reported but certainly not to the degree previous incidents would have been. I've no idea about the specifics of the case but it's shot you feel so deflated as I'm sure so many of your peers do. Regardless of the specifics and outcome of this case there is clear justified mistrust of the authorities which is a viscous cycle on both sides. " This is the first I've heard of this case so I can't comment on anything bar the fact this story has not been doing the rounds here at all. I wasn't aware of the shooting or the protests until reading this thread. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Without all the facts its hard. But I wonder what folks expect police to do when a car that had been used in a firearms incident a few days earlier comes to their attention again and doesn't stop when pursued .? Now that doesn't prejudge anything that followed but if the gun crimes are going to stop you'd (I'd) hope police would apprehend anyone so involved. We don't want to let them run free do we? " I can’t pretend to have the answers. But I can say that for a family to hear (some hours later) that a loved one was shot by the police whilst unarmed, you can understand lots of the anger and frustration. Is it so hard to envision a world in which Chris Kaba lives? If the answer to that is yes- as in yes it’s so hard to imagine, then sigh. More deflation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" This is the first I've heard of this case so I can't comment on anything bar the fact this story has not been doing the rounds here at all. I wasn't aware of the shooting or the protests until reading this thread." If not for twitter I’d probably not have heard it either. But I follow some gems on there. Including a journalist that has covered the story from the beginning | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Without all the facts its hard. But I wonder what folks expect police to do when a car that had been used in a firearms incident a few days earlier comes to their attention again and doesn't stop when pursued .? Now that doesn't prejudge anything that followed but if the gun crimes are going to stop you'd (I'd) hope police would apprehend anyone so involved. We don't want to let them run free do we? I can’t pretend to have the answers. But I can say that for a family to hear (some hours later) that a loved one was shot by the police whilst unarmed, you can understand lots of the anger and frustration. Is it so hard to envision a world in which Chris Kaba lives? If the answer to that is yes- as in yes it’s so hard to imagine, then sigh. More deflation. " It needs investigating for sure. At the moment there's a lot of inflammatory (no surprise) media. And it fits the narrative that the met have created themselves way too easily. But.... You'd hope had he pulled over when so instructed the outcome might have been different. Either way yes agree... For now I can understand why some people are inflamed by the situation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" This is the first I've heard of this case so I can't comment on anything bar the fact this story has not been doing the rounds here at all. I wasn't aware of the shooting or the protests until reading this thread. If not for twitter I’d probably not have heard it either. But I follow some gems on there. Including a journalist that has covered the story from the beginning " It’s on the front page of the BBC News website tbf right now, I don’t know how much coverage was given at the time of the initial shooting though? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far too early to offer any educated opinions in what happened. Do police have bodycams in the UK? Do they have dashcams? " They have both body cams and dash cams, as well as any cctv that may or may not be in working order. All these will be view as part of the IOPC investigation. While I agree it’s too early to offer judgement, the reported facts are sad and horrific. A tragic loss regardless of the circumstances around at fault - at the end of the day, no weapon was found at the scene and my heart literally bleeds not only for his family and friends, but for his unborn child who will never get to meet their dad. I just feel deflated by the story too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" This is the first I've heard of this case so I can't comment on anything bar the fact this story has not been doing the rounds here at all. I wasn't aware of the shooting or the protests until reading this thread. If not for twitter I’d probably not have heard it either. But I follow some gems on there. Including a journalist that has covered the story from the beginning It’s on the front page of the BBC News website tbf right now, I don’t know how much coverage was given at the time of the initial shooting though? " I don’t watch live news, but it was definitely reported by a couple of online newspapers at the time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far too early to offer any educated opinions in what happened. Do police have bodycams in the UK? Do they have dashcams? They have both body cams and dash cams, as well as any cctv that may or may not be in working order. All these will be view as part of the IOPC investigation. While I agree it’s too early to offer judgement, the reported facts are sad and horrific. A tragic loss regardless of the circumstances around at fault - at the end of the day, no weapon was found at the scene and my heart literally bleeds not only for his family and friends, but for his unborn child who will never get to meet their dad. I just feel deflated by the story too. " You get it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lots of speculation and accusations so a few facts: Since 1990 78 people have been fatally shot by police in the UK, 33 in London so almost exactly one a year on average. In recent years most of those in London have been terrorists such as the London Bridge attackers. By comparison over 1000 people are fatally shot by police each year in the US. The evidence is clear that firearms are used incredibly rarely and carefully by UK police, in situations of real or perceived danger to themselves or the public that most of us could never imagine. " Just to clarify as well that use of force by the police that is disproportionately applied is not simply the use of firearms or is it encounters that lead to death. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" This is the first I've heard of this case so I can't comment on anything bar the fact this story has not been doing the rounds here at all. I wasn't aware of the shooting or the protests until reading this thread. If not for twitter I’d probably not have heard it either. But I follow some gems on there. Including a journalist that has covered the story from the beginning It’s on the front page of the BBC News website tbf right now, I don’t know how much coverage was given at the time of the initial shooting though? " I didn’t get a news update on my phone and my other main source of info is twitter tbf but can’t dispute whether it was reported or not. Tbh that’s not really the point of the thread either. Again this reads short/sharp but it’s not intended like that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't know all the facts. The car was recognized by the police, I think for a fire arm offence. Why was he in the car in the first place? Did he stop when asked? How was the shot fired? It's really easy to point blame when you don't know the facts I'd want to know all this. Also the Met are dodgy AF, like they're a whole separate entity from the rest of the police. Also why don't they taser or shoot to incapacitate/wound, instead of kill?" There are way too few facts available to second guess this but the practical application of lethal force, hypothetically, is easier to address. Tasers don't work through glass or steel. They also, ideally, need two separate contact points on the body. this is difficult to achieve if the subject is sitting in a car. That doesn't mean you automatically revert to lethal force. If lethal force is justified, shooting to incapacitate is incredibly difficult, particularly in a dynamic situation. Also, it may not negate the lethal threat and still leave others at risk. As we don't even know at this point, whether the shot was fired deliberately in response to a perceived threat, or just a screw up, it's academic. Which is, of course, no comfort to the grieving. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I haven't read the thread so may be repeating things. The reporting of the initial shooting seems to be minimal, certainly I had missed it. To be shot for a failure to stop is complete disproportionate so anyone saying he should have stopped, or if he has nothing to hide etc needs to consider proportionality. For the IOPC to instigate a homicide investigation is unusual and it will be interesting to see how it develops. But no police officer has yet to be found guilty of causing death while on duty so I doubt that will change. Some of the complaints the family are concerning will do nothing to help the reputation of the MET which is already an embarrassment. But if the police have decided he is a wrong 'un who deserved it and feel their colleague is facing unjust charges the family will feel that" IOPC investigate all police related deaths, even if someone has died following recent police contact. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I haven't read the thread so may be repeating things. The reporting of the initial shooting seems to be minimal, certainly I had missed it. To be shot for a failure to stop is complete disproportionate so anyone saying he should have stopped, or if he has nothing to hide etc needs to consider proportionality. For the IOPC to instigate a homicide investigation is unusual and it will be interesting to see how it develops. But no police officer has yet to be found guilty of causing death while on duty so I doubt that will change. Some of the complaints the family are concerning will do nothing to help the reputation of the MET which is already an embarrassment. But if the police have decided he is a wrong 'un who deserved it and feel their colleague is facing unjust charges the family will feel that IOPC investigate all police related deaths, even if someone has died following recent police contact." Having worked alongside the IOPC in death in custody cases I'm fully aware of that. So I'll repeat the key bit: "for the IOPC to insigate a homicide investigation is unusual". The investigation part is standard. Declaring it a homicide investigation isn't | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I haven't read the thread so may be repeating things. The reporting of the initial shooting seems to be minimal, certainly I had missed it. To be shot for a failure to stop is complete disproportionate so anyone saying he should have stopped, or if he has nothing to hide etc needs to consider proportionality. For the IOPC to instigate a homicide investigation is unusual and it will be interesting to see how it develops. But no police officer has yet to be found guilty of causing death while on duty so I doubt that will change. Some of the complaints the family are concerning will do nothing to help the reputation of the MET which is already an embarrassment. But if the police have decided he is a wrong 'un who deserved it and feel their colleague is facing unjust charges the family will feel that IOPC investigate all police related deaths, even if someone has died following recent police contact. Having worked alongside the IOPC in death in custody cases I'm fully aware of that. So I'll repeat the key bit: "for the IOPC to insigate a homicide investigation is unusual". The investigation part is standard. Declaring it a homicide investigation isn't " We don't have 'homicide' in the UK, we have murder or manslaughter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I haven't read the thread so may be repeating things. The reporting of the initial shooting seems to be minimal, certainly I had missed it. To be shot for a failure to stop is complete disproportionate so anyone saying he should have stopped, or if he has nothing to hide etc needs to consider proportionality. For the IOPC to instigate a homicide investigation is unusual and it will be interesting to see how it develops. But no police officer has yet to be found guilty of causing death while on duty so I doubt that will change. Some of the complaints the family are concerning will do nothing to help the reputation of the MET which is already an embarrassment. But if the police have decided he is a wrong 'un who deserved it and feel their colleague is facing unjust charges the family will feel that IOPC investigate all police related deaths, even if someone has died following recent police contact. Having worked alongside the IOPC in death in custody cases I'm fully aware of that. So I'll repeat the key bit: "for the IOPC to insigate a homicide investigation is unusual". The investigation part is standard. Declaring it a homicide investigation isn't We don't have 'homicide' in the UK, we have murder or manslaughter. " https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/homicide-murder-and-manslaughter Shit someone should really tell the Crown Prosecution Service | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I haven't read the thread so may be repeating things. The reporting of the initial shooting seems to be minimal, certainly I had missed it. To be shot for a failure to stop is complete disproportionate so anyone saying he should have stopped, or if he has nothing to hide etc needs to consider proportionality. For the IOPC to instigate a homicide investigation is unusual and it will be interesting to see how it develops. But no police officer has yet to be found guilty of causing death while on duty so I doubt that will change. Some of the complaints the family are concerning will do nothing to help the reputation of the MET which is already an embarrassment. But if the police have decided he is a wrong 'un who deserved it and feel their colleague is facing unjust charges the family will feel that IOPC investigate all police related deaths, even if someone has died following recent police contact. Having worked alongside the IOPC in death in custody cases I'm fully aware of that. So I'll repeat the key bit: "for the IOPC to insigate a homicide investigation is unusual". The investigation part is standard. Declaring it a homicide investigation isn't We don't have 'homicide' in the UK, we have murder or manslaughter. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/homicide-murder-and-manslaughter Shit someone should really tell the Crown Prosecution Service " There is no criminal offence of 'homicide' as that link makes clear, only murder or manslaughter. In the case of Chris Kaba there is a murder enquiry under way, not a homicide enquiry as the poster had said. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I haven't read the thread so may be repeating things. The reporting of the initial shooting seems to be minimal, certainly I had missed it. To be shot for a failure to stop is complete disproportionate so anyone saying he should have stopped, or if he has nothing to hide etc needs to consider proportionality. For the IOPC to instigate a homicide investigation is unusual and it will be interesting to see how it develops. But no police officer has yet to be found guilty of causing death while on duty so I doubt that will change. Some of the complaints the family are concerning will do nothing to help the reputation of the MET which is already an embarrassment. But if the police have decided he is a wrong 'un who deserved it and feel their colleague is facing unjust charges the family will feel that IOPC investigate all police related deaths, even if someone has died following recent police contact. Having worked alongside the IOPC in death in custody cases I'm fully aware of that. So I'll repeat the key bit: "for the IOPC to insigate a homicide investigation is unusual". The investigation part is standard. Declaring it a homicide investigation isn't We don't have 'homicide' in the UK, we have murder or manslaughter. " You might want to let the IOPC know as that is the wording they are using in statements on relating to this death and on their website Or maybe they are using the term homicide as the broad term for the scope of their investigation? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I haven't read the thread so may be repeating things. The reporting of the initial shooting seems to be minimal, certainly I had missed it. To be shot for a failure to stop is complete disproportionate so anyone saying he should have stopped, or if he has nothing to hide etc needs to consider proportionality. For the IOPC to instigate a homicide investigation is unusual and it will be interesting to see how it develops. But no police officer has yet to be found guilty of causing death while on duty so I doubt that will change. Some of the complaints the family are concerning will do nothing to help the reputation of the MET which is already an embarrassment. But if the police have decided he is a wrong 'un who deserved it and feel their colleague is facing unjust charges the family will feel that IOPC investigate all police related deaths, even if someone has died following recent police contact. Having worked alongside the IOPC in death in custody cases I'm fully aware of that. So I'll repeat the key bit: "for the IOPC to insigate a homicide investigation is unusual". The investigation part is standard. Declaring it a homicide investigation isn't We don't have 'homicide' in the UK, we have murder or manslaughter. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/homicide-murder-and-manslaughter Shit someone should really tell the Crown Prosecution Service There is no criminal offence of 'homicide' as that link makes clear, only murder or manslaughter. In the case of Chris Kaba there is a murder enquiry under way, not a homicide enquiry as the poster had said." No there is a homicide investigation led by the IOPC, supported by Scotlsnd Yard and the Met. Which could iead to a charge of murder, manslaughter or no charges and a referral to inquest where the Coroner could conclude it is a lawful killing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I haven't read the thread so may be repeating things. The reporting of the initial shooting seems to be minimal, certainly I had missed it. To be shot for a failure to stop is complete disproportionate so anyone saying he should have stopped, or if he has nothing to hide etc needs to consider proportionality. For the IOPC to instigate a homicide investigation is unusual and it will be interesting to see how it develops. But no police officer has yet to be found guilty of causing death while on duty so I doubt that will change. Some of the complaints the family are concerning will do nothing to help the reputation of the MET which is already an embarrassment. But if the police have decided he is a wrong 'un who deserved it and feel their colleague is facing unjust charges the family will feel that IOPC investigate all police related deaths, even if someone has died following recent police contact. Having worked alongside the IOPC in death in custody cases I'm fully aware of that. So I'll repeat the key bit: "for the IOPC to insigate a homicide investigation is unusual". The investigation part is standard. Declaring it a homicide investigation isn't We don't have 'homicide' in the UK, we have murder or manslaughter. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/homicide-murder-and-manslaughter Shit someone should really tell the Crown Prosecution Service There is no criminal offence of 'homicide' as that link makes clear, only murder or manslaughter. In the case of Chris Kaba there is a murder enquiry under way, not a homicide enquiry as the poster had said. No there is a homicide investigation led by the IOPC, supported by Scotlsnd Yard and the Met. Which could iead to a charge of murder, manslaughter or no charges and a referral to inquest where the Coroner could conclude it is a lawful killing " You are correct ! The reports I read referred to a murder enquiry but the IOPC uses the term homicide, presumably to keep a broad scope. Apologies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. You can't say that. You may have an opinion but that is all. An armed cop responding to an incident with a car known to have been involved in firearms offence recently...has all sorts of things going through his head. I would imagine the race of the driver matters little in this situation. All the facts aren't known but the family aren't helping by blaming racism. " Please don't make this about race if the guy Had been yellow pink white or brown and acted in the same way the result would have been the same. I don't know anyone involved in gun crime ,if I did I would not be borrowing their car and if asked to stop by the police I would have | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. You can't say that. You may have an opinion but that is all. An armed cop responding to an incident with a car known to have been involved in firearms offence recently...has all sorts of things going through his head. I would imagine the race of the driver matters little in this situation. All the facts aren't known but the family aren't helping by blaming racism. Please don't make this about race if the guy Had been yellow pink white or brown and acted in the same way the result would have been the same. I don't know anyone involved in gun crime ,if I did I would not be borrowing their car and if asked to stop by the police I would have" It does seem odd to jump right to racism when we have 2 other confirmed factors in the shooting. Being in a car marked for gun crime + not stopping when told to. But until more evidence comes out we can’t call it either way. I’m sure each side will push whatever agenda they want no matter what evidence comes out. And sadly the met haven’t exactly done themselves an favours so whatever they say/do about it will be wrong | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think there is a level of white privilege from some people in this thread, to say race didn't come in to it is bold when you consider the overwhelming cases of black people dying from police situations where white people in the same situation have been treated differently, racism 100% exists in the police force, both here and especially in America. Im not sure what facts or "evidence" some of you are waiting for before allowing race to be used in this case, unless the police officer that pulled the trigger openly admits that he shot him because he's black? With that said, we will most likely never know the truth, however it's not an unfair assumption in today's world to attribute some of what happened to the young mans skin colour unfortunately. " The evidence will be bodycam footage + other cctv so we can see what actually happened Just claiming racism, or claiming not racism, is silly without the video | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think there is a level of white privilege from some people in this thread, to say race didn't come in to it is bold when you consider the overwhelming cases of black people dying from police situations where white people in the same situation have been treated differently, racism 100% exists in the police force, both here and especially in America. Im not sure what facts or "evidence" some of you are waiting for before allowing race to be used in this case, unless the police officer that pulled the trigger openly admits that he shot him because he's black? With that said, we will most likely never know the truth, however it's not an unfair assumption in today's world to attribute some of what happened to the young mans skin colour unfortunately. The evidence will be bodycam footage + other cctv so we can see what actually happened Just claiming racism, or claiming not racism, is silly without the video " No I think a good point was made in the comment you quoted which I made earlier which is that in claiming that race was a factor, it is not saying that this was a malicious racist attack. More that it’s further evidence that force appears to be applied more when interacting with Black people than any other race. Race imo has at least been a factor in how the police have treated the family of the victim. Yet again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think there is a level of white privilege from some people in this thread, to say race didn't come in to it is bold when you consider the overwhelming cases of black people dying from police situations where white people in the same situation have been treated differently, racism 100% exists in the police force, both here and especially in America. Im not sure what facts or "evidence" some of you are waiting for before allowing race to be used in this case, unless the police officer that pulled the trigger openly admits that he shot him because he's black? With that said, we will most likely never know the truth, however it's not an unfair assumption in today's world to attribute some of what happened to the young mans skin colour unfortunately. The evidence will be bodycam footage + other cctv so we can see what actually happened Just claiming racism, or claiming not racism, is silly without the video No I think a good point was made in the comment you quoted which I made earlier which is that in claiming that race was a factor, it is not saying that this was a malicious racist attack. More that it’s further evidence that force appears to be applied more when interacting with Black people than any other race. Race imo has at least been a factor in how the police have treated the family of the victim. Yet again. " I dunno, I’m reading lots of stuff that apparently this guy was a well known violent member of a gang. Witness statements are saying the police blocked his car in, gave him time to give up and surrender and he chose to try and ram armed police And I dunno enough about how police do stuff to say why/how they did something was wrong or rught. I think assumptions either way are silly. What’s important now is that an investigation is properly carried out to find out if the shooting was justified | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I think assumptions either way are silly. What’s important now is that an investigation is properly carried out to find out if the shooting was justified " I still think it’s fair to say the police handling of the death appears to be consistent with their interaction with Black families. But whatever | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If the driver of the car would have stopped when ordered by the police this would have never happened " 100% correct. A known criminal trying to evade the rozzers in a car linked to firearms offences just days before would never be treated the same as a joyrider so he should never have chanced it and he’d be alive today | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If these guys are expert marksman why do they shot to kill. I do understand that the threat may be great because of the unknown situation at that point in time. But maybe disable but not kill, this is happening to often now and needs to be addressed... " Too often? I agree that even once is to often but are you aware this happened in the UK? Not the US? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think there is a level of white privilege from some people in this thread, to say race didn't come in to it is bold when you consider the overwhelming cases of black people dying from police situations where white people in the same situation have been treated differently, racism 100% exists in the police force, both here and especially in America. Im not sure what facts or "evidence" some of you are waiting for before allowing race to be used in this case, unless the police officer that pulled the trigger openly admits that he shot him because he's black? With that said, we will most likely never know the truth, however it's not an unfair assumption in today's world to attribute some of what happened to the young mans skin colour unfortunately. The evidence will be bodycam footage + other cctv so we can see what actually happened Just claiming racism, or claiming not racism, is silly without the video No I think a good point was made in the comment you quoted which I made earlier which is that in claiming that race was a factor, it is not saying that this was a malicious racist attack. More that it’s further evidence that force appears to be applied more when interacting with Black people than any other race. Race imo has at least been a factor in how the police have treated the family of the victim. Yet again. " How have the police treated the family? As far as I have seen all we know of the treatment is that it took them 11 hrs to notify them. I'm not sure how long people expect but if hes in someone else's car with no Id, surely it's going to take a bit of time to confirm identification.? Which might not be so unreasonable? We just don't know the facts yet. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think there is a level of white privilege from some people in this thread, to say race didn't come in to it is bold when you consider the overwhelming cases of black people dying from police situations where white people in the same situation have been treated differently, racism 100% exists in the police force, both here and especially in America. Im not sure what facts or "evidence" some of you are waiting for before allowing race to be used in this case, unless the police officer that pulled the trigger openly admits that he shot him because he's black? With that said, we will most likely never know the truth, however it's not an unfair assumption in today's world to attribute some of what happened to the young mans skin colour unfortunately. The evidence will be bodycam footage + other cctv so we can see what actually happened Just claiming racism, or claiming not racism, is silly without the video No I think a good point was made in the comment you quoted which I made earlier which is that in claiming that race was a factor, it is not saying that this was a malicious racist attack. More that it’s further evidence that force appears to be applied more when interacting with Black people than any other race. Race imo has at least been a factor in how the police have treated the family of the victim. Yet again. How have the police treated the family? As far as I have seen all we know of the treatment is that it took them 11 hrs to notify them. I'm not sure how long people expect but if hes in someone else's car with no Id, surely it's going to take a bit of time to confirm identification.? Which might not be so unreasonable? We just don't know the facts yet. " He was known to police, they would not have needed a drivers license or passport to be found on him to verify his identity | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How have the police treated the family? As far as I have seen all we know of the treatment is that it took them 11 hrs to notify them. I'm not sure how long people expect but if hes in someone else's car with no Id, surely it's going to take a bit of time to confirm identification.? Which might not be so unreasonable? We just don't know the facts yet. " Ok | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The armed police are extremely well trained, they will not take any shots unless given specific permission, even then the officer who fires the shot is automatically suspended until after an investigation, to say they would have behaved any differently if the guy was white I'm sure is not the case. This will be seen after the results of the investigation " I think uk armed response are some of the best in the world. People are trying to “Americanise” the issue by pretending we have the same issues over here as they do in the US. And we just don’t. But hey, that’s how you push an agenda. Don’t worry about facts or evidence or soon to be released footage. Just make a headline and collect some clicks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The armed police are extremely well trained, they will not take any shots unless given specific permission, even then the officer who fires the shot is automatically suspended until after an investigation, to say they would have behaved any differently if the guy was white I'm sure is not the case. This will be seen after the results of the investigation I think uk armed response are some of the best in the world. People are trying to “Americanise” the issue by pretending we have the same issues over here as they do in the US. And we just don’t. But hey, that’s how you push an agenda. Don’t worry about facts or evidence or soon to be released footage. Just make a headline and collect some clicks " I don’t think upset people are trying to push an agenda. I think they’re just upset and tired. After all, this is decades worth of social issues | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The armed police are extremely well trained, they will not take any shots unless given specific permission, even then the officer who fires the shot is automatically suspended until after an investigation, to say they would have behaved any differently if the guy was white I'm sure is not the case. This will be seen after the results of the investigation " Well he wasn't automatically suspended actually. He was only suspended later due to a "significant impact on public confidence". I also wonder if there hadn't been people with an agenda (of possibly not having unarmed people killed in the street) that murder investigation would even have happened. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The armed police are extremely well trained, they will not take any shots unless given specific permission, even then the officer who fires the shot is automatically suspended until after an investigation, to say they would have behaved any differently if the guy was white I'm sure is not the case. This will be seen after the results of the investigation I think uk armed response are some of the best in the world. People are trying to “Americanise” the issue by pretending we have the same issues over here as they do in the US. And we just don’t. But hey, that’s how you push an agenda. Don’t worry about facts or evidence or soon to be released footage. Just make a headline and collect some clicks I don’t think upset people are trying to push an agenda. I think they’re just upset and tired. After all, this is decades worth of social issues " I’d disagree. Trying to push anything on this before all the info is pushing an agenda. We don’t even have bodycam footage yet and it’s being labelled as this and that. And I don’t mean anyone specific. The media are going to push an agenda on this for clicks. People will push a racist agenda on it. Others will push pro-police agendas. I’ll save any opinions until facts start coming out. This could easily be a racial thing, it could just as likely be not a racial issue. Who knows. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" People are trying to “Americanise” the issue by pretending we have the same issues over here as they do in the US. And we just don’t. But hey, that’s how you push an agenda. Don’t worry about facts or evidence or soon to be released footage. Just make a headline and collect some clicks I don’t think upset people are trying to push an agenda. I think they’re just upset and tired. After all, this is decades worth of social issues I’d disagree. Trying to push anything on this before all the info is pushing an agenda. We don’t even have bodycam footage yet and it’s being labelled as this and that. And I don’t mean anyone specific. The media are going to push an agenda on this for clicks. People will push a racist agenda on it. Others will push pro-police agendas. I’ll save any opinions until facts start coming out. This could easily be a racial thing, it could just as likely be not a racial issue. Who knows. " Cool | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great...." You know this how? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great.... You know this how? " Agenda 2022, facts don’t matter. Just say stuff. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great.... You know this how? Agenda 2022, facts don’t matter. Just say stuff. " Facts do matter. People (on this thread and in wider society) have provided lots of facts that support that force is used disproportionately against black men. There is also the historic relationship between the police and black communities in London. Facts matter- people have provided them. And I’m not replying to it in the context of the ‘trigger happy cops’ comment but in reply to your ‘facts don’t matter’ which is a weird assertion in this thread that you keep making. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great.... You know this how? Agenda 2022, facts don’t matter. Just say stuff. Facts do matter. People (on this thread and in wider society) have provided lots of facts that support that force is used disproportionately against black men. There is also the historic relationship between the police and black communities in London. Facts matter- people have provided them. And I’m not replying to it in the context of the ‘trigger happy cops’ comment but in reply to your ‘facts don’t matter’ which is a weird assertion in this thread that you keep making. " Of course. I'm not sure anyone is arguing against the historic racist behaviours of some of the met officers. That's there for all to see. And of course sets some of the context in which this incident occurred. In this particular incident it's (in my opinion) unhelpful to jump to any conclusions and pass emotive and throw away inflammatory prejudiced comments until some more facts are established. An individual driving a car that wasn't his and had been used in a firearms incident days before, and refusing to stop, then driving at the police...I can't imagine any circumstance where the outcome is a good one. But... When facts become available perhaps. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgetting this specific event. And disregarding facts. Does the general mood and feeling of your fellow citizens like Steve here come into play at all? Is there not a clear issue to be addressed if there are so many clearly intelligent and engaged people feeling so disenfranchised? Which I think was the original sentiment of the thread albeit framed around this shooting and fallout" For me the feelings come after the facts. Once the facts are out and those feelings are legitimised then great, full support We’ve seen enough instances now, on both sides, where people are quick to make assumptions without all the info. That’s what it is in 2022 now. Forget the relevant info, the evidence, the bodycam footage. If this situation can be twisted to help push an agenda you believe in, just do it. And that’s for both sides. People automatically saying it wasn’t racially motivated are equally as bad. Because no one knows the facts. And I bet most people pushing these agendas without the facts will forget about all this tomorrow. Because they don’t actually care about what happens or the outcomes. They just wanna push their idea. And they’ll find another short headline next week to do the same | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgetting this specific event. And disregarding facts. Does the general mood and feeling of your fellow citizens like Steve here come into play at all? Is there not a clear issue to be addressed if there are so many clearly intelligent and engaged people feeling so disenfranchised? Which I think was the original sentiment of the thread albeit framed around this shooting and fallout" Yes that would certainly come into play, centred i would imagine around police liaison officials and engagement with local communities. I presume that is being done all along. Perhaps more is needed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgetting this specific event. And disregarding facts. Does the general mood and feeling of your fellow citizens like Steve here come into play at all? Is there not a clear issue to be addressed if there are so many clearly intelligent and engaged people feeling so disenfranchised? Which I think was the original sentiment of the thread albeit framed around this shooting and fallout" Yep framed that way it's a different discussion. And yes of course there is a huge issue to be addressed. Which requires all parties to make changes. I'm far from convinced that any of the hashtag protests do a single thing to move us towards a better place. If anything I think they are more harmful as they delude the instatwit brigade into thinking a small momentary gesture is going to make a difference. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgetting this specific event. And disregarding facts. Does the general mood and feeling of your fellow citizens like Steve here come into play at all? Is there not a clear issue to be addressed if there are so many clearly intelligent and engaged people feeling so disenfranchised? Which I think was the original sentiment of the thread albeit framed around this shooting and fallout" Disregard facts? No, facts always take precedence over feelings. Intelligent people believe all sorts of nonsense and have followed all kinds of terrible causes. Let's establish the facts in this case then go forward from there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great...." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great...." not as trigger happy or stabby as some members of our ever decaying society whenever I hear about these type of incidents I can’t help but think about officers who’ve been killed in the line of duty and how I would act if I was confronted by an armed or dangerous person I know kaba wasn’t in this case unfortunately the car had a marker against it maybe wrong place wrong time if so that’s sad a life has been needlessly taken as people above have mentioned I’m going to see how the investigaton goes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think there is a level of white privilege from some people in this thread, to say race didn't come in to it is bold when you consider the overwhelming cases of black people dying from police situations where white people in the same situation have been treated differently, racism 100% exists in the police force, both here and especially in America. Im not sure what facts or "evidence" some of you are waiting for before allowing race to be used in this case, unless the police officer that pulled the trigger openly admits that he shot him because he's black? With that said, we will most likely never know the truth, however it's not an unfair assumption in today's world to attribute some of what happened to the young mans skin colour unfortunately. The evidence will be bodycam footage + other cctv so we can see what actually happened Just claiming racism, or claiming not racism, is silly without the video No I think a good point was made in the comment you quoted which I made earlier which is that in claiming that race was a factor, it is not saying that this was a malicious racist attack. More that it’s further evidence that force appears to be applied more when interacting with Black people than any other race. Race imo has at least been a factor in how the police have treated the family of the victim. Yet again. How have the police treated the family? As far as I have seen all we know of the treatment is that it took them 11 hrs to notify them. I'm not sure how long people expect but if hes in someone else's car with no Id, surely it's going to take a bit of time to confirm identification.? Which might not be so unreasonable? We just don't know the facts yet. He was known to police, they would not have needed a drivers license or passport to be found on him to verify his identity " There is absolutely no justification firvan agony message to take that long to be passed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great...." Any idea how many people have been shot by the police in the last 3 years, and many armed responses they've attended? Trigger happy is the last thing our armed response units are. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great.... Any idea how many people have been shot by the police in the last 3 years, and many armed responses they've attended? Trigger happy is the last thing our armed response units are. Winston " Tell that to the family of Jean Charles da Silva e de Menezes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great.... Any idea how many people have been shot by the police in the last 3 years, and many armed responses they've attended? Trigger happy is the last thing our armed response units are. Winston Tell that to the family of Jean Charles da Silva e de Menezes." Very very similar situation. And also tragic. In the middle of a suicide bombing campaign on the underground by men wearing rucksacks, a man with a rucksack runs through a station and doesn't stop when told to do so. Now an answer to the question I asked. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You're not being a woke snowflake. What happened was terrible, and it looks very bad for the Met, as usual." This, basically.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the family are totally correct that if their son had been white he wouldn't be dead now. " And this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great.... Any idea how many people have been shot by the police in the last 3 years, and many armed responses they've attended? Trigger happy is the last thing our armed response units are. Winston Tell that to the family of Jean Charles da Silva e de Menezes. Very very similar situation. And also tragic. In the middle of a suicide bombing campaign on the underground by men wearing rucksacks, a man with a rucksack runs through a station and doesn't stop when told to do so. Now an answer to the question I asked. Winston" Except that's not what happened. de Menezes did not run away when asked to stop. He did not jump over any barriers, he actually picked up a Metro newspaper and used his Oystercard, then jogged across the platform and sat down on a train. He was only challenged (by undercover police, in plainclothes) when he was on the train and sat down: "Menezes entered the tube station at about 10:00 a.m., stopping to pick up a free newspaper. He used his Oyster card to pay the fare, walked through the barriers, and descended the escalator. He then ran across the platform to board the newly arrived train. Menezes boarded the train and found one of the first available seats. Three surveillance officers, codenamed Hotel 1, Hotel 3 and Hotel 9, followed Menezes onto the train. According to Hotel 3, Menezes sat down with a glass panel to his right about two seats in. Hotel 3 then took a seat on the left with about two or three passengers between Menezes and himself. When the firearms officers arrived on the platform, Hotel 3 moved to the door, blocked it from closing with his left foot, and shouted "He's here!" to identify the suspect's location. The firearms officers boarded the train and it was initially claimed they challenged the suspect, though later reports indicate he was not challenged. According to Hotel 3, Menezes then stood up and moved towards the officers and Hotel 3, at which point Hotel 3 grabbed him, pinned his arms against his torso, and pushed him back into the seat. Although Menezes was being restrained, his body was straight and not in a natural sitting position. Hotel 3 heard a shot close to his ear, and was dragged away onto the floor of the carriage. He shouted "Police!" and with hands raised was dragged out of the carriage by one of the armed officers who had boarded the train. Hotel 3 then heard several gunshots while being dragged out. Two officers fired a total of eleven shots according to the number of empty cartridge casings found on the floor of the train afterwards. Menezes was shot seven times in the head and once in the shoulder at close range and died at the scene. An eyewitness later said that the eleven shots were fired over a thirty-second period, at three-second intervals. A separate witness reported hearing five shots, followed at an interval by several more shots." The Met lied through their teeth about the case of Mr de Menezes, to try to justify it. It was not justifiable, as the Met themselves finally accepted, but only after a protracted campaign by the family and others, during which, the Met continued to gaslight them. The eventual end was that: "in a joint statement with the family, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner made "a further unreserved apology to the family for the tragic death of Jean Charles de Menezes" and reiterated "that he was a totally innocent victim and in no way to blame for his untimely death"" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If these guys are expert marksman why do they shot to kill. I do understand that the threat may be great because of the unknown situation at that point in time. But maybe disable but not kill, this is happening to often now and needs to be addressed... " They are not expert marksmen/women. They train to a consistently low standard of marksmanship or they would not be able to maintain the numbers required. Putting bullets into people carries a high risk. Shoot to incapacitate is rarely possible anyway, and might not negate the lethal threat, so is not realistic. A bullet in the thigh can rupture a femoral artery and without immediate treatment you will bleed out in minutes. You can also still pull a trigger. It's not like the movies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great.... Any idea how many people have been shot by the police in the last 3 years, and many armed responses they've attended? Trigger happy is the last thing our armed response units are. Winston Tell that to the family of Jean Charles da Silva e de Menezes." It's a different case. I mean if you're going to make judgement based on history the fella had a firearms offence in his past. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great.... Any idea how many people have been shot by the police in the last 3 years, and many armed responses they've attended? Trigger happy is the last thing our armed response units are. Winston Tell that to the family of Jean Charles da Silva e de Menezes. Very very similar situation. And also tragic. In the middle of a suicide bombing campaign on the underground by men wearing rucksacks, a man with a rucksack runs through a station and doesn't stop when told to do so. Now an answer to the question I asked. Winston Except that's not what happened. de Menezes did not run away when asked to stop. He did not jump over any barriers, he actually picked up a Metro newspaper and used his Oystercard, then jogged across the platform and sat down on a train. He was only challenged (by undercover police, in plainclothes) when he was on the train and sat down: "Menezes entered the tube station at about 10:00 a.m., stopping to pick up a free newspaper. He used his Oyster card to pay the fare, walked through the barriers, and descended the escalator. He then ran across the platform to board the newly arrived train. Menezes boarded the train and found one of the first available seats. Three surveillance officers, codenamed Hotel 1, Hotel 3 and Hotel 9, followed Menezes onto the train. According to Hotel 3, Menezes sat down with a glass panel to his right about two seats in. Hotel 3 then took a seat on the left with about two or three passengers between Menezes and himself. When the firearms officers arrived on the platform, Hotel 3 moved to the door, blocked it from closing with his left foot, and shouted "He's here!" to identify the suspect's location. The firearms officers boarded the train and it was initially claimed they challenged the suspect, though later reports indicate he was not challenged. According to Hotel 3, Menezes then stood up and moved towards the officers and Hotel 3, at which point Hotel 3 grabbed him, pinned his arms against his torso, and pushed him back into the seat. Although Menezes was being restrained, his body was straight and not in a natural sitting position. Hotel 3 heard a shot close to his ear, and was dragged away onto the floor of the carriage. He shouted "Police!" and with hands raised was dragged out of the carriage by one of the armed officers who had boarded the train. Hotel 3 then heard several gunshots while being dragged out. Two officers fired a total of eleven shots according to the number of empty cartridge casings found on the floor of the train afterwards. Menezes was shot seven times in the head and once in the shoulder at close range and died at the scene. An eyewitness later said that the eleven shots were fired over a thirty-second period, at three-second intervals. A separate witness reported hearing five shots, followed at an interval by several more shots." The Met lied through their teeth about the case of Mr de Menezes, to try to justify it. It was not justifiable, as the Met themselves finally accepted, but only after a protracted campaign by the family and others, during which, the Met continued to gaslight them. The eventual end was that: "in a joint statement with the family, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner made "a further unreserved apology to the family for the tragic death of Jean Charles de Menezes" and reiterated "that he was a totally innocent victim and in no way to blame for his untimely death""" Would you like to add the preceding surveillance cock up details, and vague instructions given by the Silver Commander, Cressida Dick? The officers were operating under a new, hastily put together tactic, called Operation Kratos. It was based on the premise that the subject is positively identified as a suicide bomber in imminent expectation of setting off a device. Once the officers are given the go signal, it was only ever going to have one objective, and that's what they did. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great.... Any idea how many people have been shot by the police in the last 3 years, and many armed responses they've attended? Trigger happy is the last thing our armed response units are. Winston Tell that to the family of Jean Charles da Silva e de Menezes. Very very similar situation. And also tragic. In the middle of a suicide bombing campaign on the underground by men wearing rucksacks, a man with a rucksack runs through a station and doesn't stop when told to do so. Now an answer to the question I asked. Winston Except that's not what happened. de Menezes did not run away when asked to stop. He did not jump over any barriers, he actually picked up a Metro newspaper and used his Oystercard, then jogged across the platform and sat down on a train. He was only challenged (by undercover police, in plainclothes) when he was on the train and sat down: "Menezes entered the tube station at about 10:00 a.m., stopping to pick up a free newspaper. He used his Oyster card to pay the fare, walked through the barriers, and descended the escalator. He then ran across the platform to board the newly arrived train. Menezes boarded the train and found one of the first available seats. Three surveillance officers, codenamed Hotel 1, Hotel 3 and Hotel 9, followed Menezes onto the train. According to Hotel 3, Menezes sat down with a glass panel to his right about two seats in. Hotel 3 then took a seat on the left with about two or three passengers between Menezes and himself. When the firearms officers arrived on the platform, Hotel 3 moved to the door, blocked it from closing with his left foot, and shouted "He's here!" to identify the suspect's location. The firearms officers boarded the train and it was initially claimed they challenged the suspect, though later reports indicate he was not challenged. According to Hotel 3, Menezes then stood up and moved towards the officers and Hotel 3, at which point Hotel 3 grabbed him, pinned his arms against his torso, and pushed him back into the seat. Although Menezes was being restrained, his body was straight and not in a natural sitting position. Hotel 3 heard a shot close to his ear, and was dragged away onto the floor of the carriage. He shouted "Police!" and with hands raised was dragged out of the carriage by one of the armed officers who had boarded the train. Hotel 3 then heard several gunshots while being dragged out. Two officers fired a total of eleven shots according to the number of empty cartridge casings found on the floor of the train afterwards. Menezes was shot seven times in the head and once in the shoulder at close range and died at the scene. An eyewitness later said that the eleven shots were fired over a thirty-second period, at three-second intervals. A separate witness reported hearing five shots, followed at an interval by several more shots." The Met lied through their teeth about the case of Mr de Menezes, to try to justify it. It was not justifiable, as the Met themselves finally accepted, but only after a protracted campaign by the family and others, during which, the Met continued to gaslight them. The eventual end was that: "in a joint statement with the family, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner made "a further unreserved apology to the family for the tragic death of Jean Charles de Menezes" and reiterated "that he was a totally innocent victim and in no way to blame for his untimely death""" Now I've read that it comes back to me. You're absolutely right, my first response was innacurate. Thanks for the reminder, appreciated. Disgraceful. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great.... Any idea how many people have been shot by the police in the last 3 years, and many armed responses they've attended? Trigger happy is the last thing our armed response units are. Winston Tell that to the family of Jean Charles da Silva e de Menezes. Very very similar situation. And also tragic. In the middle of a suicide bombing campaign on the underground by men wearing rucksacks, a man with a rucksack runs through a station and doesn't stop when told to do so. Now an answer to the question I asked. Winston Except that's not what happened. de Menezes did not run away when asked to stop. He did not jump over any barriers, he actually picked up a Metro newspaper and used his Oystercard, then jogged across the platform and sat down on a train. He was only challenged (by undercover police, in plainclothes) when he was on the train and sat down: "Menezes entered the tube station at about 10:00 a.m., stopping to pick up a free newspaper. He used his Oyster card to pay the fare, walked through the barriers, and descended the escalator. He then ran across the platform to board the newly arrived train. Menezes boarded the train and found one of the first available seats. Three surveillance officers, codenamed Hotel 1, Hotel 3 and Hotel 9, followed Menezes onto the train. According to Hotel 3, Menezes sat down with a glass panel to his right about two seats in. Hotel 3 then took a seat on the left with about two or three passengers between Menezes and himself. When the firearms officers arrived on the platform, Hotel 3 moved to the door, blocked it from closing with his left foot, and shouted "He's here!" to identify the suspect's location. The firearms officers boarded the train and it was initially claimed they challenged the suspect, though later reports indicate he was not challenged. According to Hotel 3, Menezes then stood up and moved towards the officers and Hotel 3, at which point Hotel 3 grabbed him, pinned his arms against his torso, and pushed him back into the seat. Although Menezes was being restrained, his body was straight and not in a natural sitting position. Hotel 3 heard a shot close to his ear, and was dragged away onto the floor of the carriage. He shouted "Police!" and with hands raised was dragged out of the carriage by one of the armed officers who had boarded the train. Hotel 3 then heard several gunshots while being dragged out. Two officers fired a total of eleven shots according to the number of empty cartridge casings found on the floor of the train afterwards. Menezes was shot seven times in the head and once in the shoulder at close range and died at the scene. An eyewitness later said that the eleven shots were fired over a thirty-second period, at three-second intervals. A separate witness reported hearing five shots, followed at an interval by several more shots." The Met lied through their teeth about the case of Mr de Menezes, to try to justify it. It was not justifiable, as the Met themselves finally accepted, but only after a protracted campaign by the family and others, during which, the Met continued to gaslight them. The eventual end was that: "in a joint statement with the family, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner made "a further unreserved apology to the family for the tragic death of Jean Charles de Menezes" and reiterated "that he was a totally innocent victim and in no way to blame for his untimely death"" Would you like to add the preceding surveillance cock up details, and vague instructions given by the Silver Commander, Cressida Dick? The officers were operating under a new, hastily put together tactic, called Operation Kratos. It was based on the premise that the subject is positively identified as a suicide bomber in imminent expectation of setting off a device. Once the officers are given the go signal, it was only ever going to have one objective, and that's what they did." Also this. ^^ I fear we're moving away from Steve's point. And it shows what an emotive subject this case is. I still think this could possibly have been avoided. And this case, like all similar cases, are tragic. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great.... Any idea how many people have been shot by the police in the last 3 years, and many armed responses they've attended? Trigger happy is the last thing our armed response units are. Winston Tell that to the family of Jean Charles da Silva e de Menezes. Very very similar situation. And also tragic. In the middle of a suicide bombing campaign on the underground by men wearing rucksacks, a man with a rucksack runs through a station and doesn't stop when told to do so. Now an answer to the question I asked. Winston Except that's not what happened. de Menezes did not run away when asked to stop. He did not jump over any barriers, he actually picked up a Metro newspaper and used his Oystercard, then jogged across the platform and sat down on a train. He was only challenged (by undercover police, in plainclothes) when he was on the train and sat down: "Menezes entered the tube station at about 10:00 a.m., stopping to pick up a free newspaper. He used his Oyster card to pay the fare, walked through the barriers, and descended the escalator. He then ran across the platform to board the newly arrived train. Menezes boarded the train and found one of the first available seats. Three surveillance officers, codenamed Hotel 1, Hotel 3 and Hotel 9, followed Menezes onto the train. According to Hotel 3, Menezes sat down with a glass panel to his right about two seats in. Hotel 3 then took a seat on the left with about two or three passengers between Menezes and himself. When the firearms officers arrived on the platform, Hotel 3 moved to the door, blocked it from closing with his left foot, and shouted "He's here!" to identify the suspect's location. The firearms officers boarded the train and it was initially claimed they challenged the suspect, though later reports indicate he was not challenged. According to Hotel 3, Menezes then stood up and moved towards the officers and Hotel 3, at which point Hotel 3 grabbed him, pinned his arms against his torso, and pushed him back into the seat. Although Menezes was being restrained, his body was straight and not in a natural sitting position. Hotel 3 heard a shot close to his ear, and was dragged away onto the floor of the carriage. He shouted "Police!" and with hands raised was dragged out of the carriage by one of the armed officers who had boarded the train. Hotel 3 then heard several gunshots while being dragged out. Two officers fired a total of eleven shots according to the number of empty cartridge casings found on the floor of the train afterwards. Menezes was shot seven times in the head and once in the shoulder at close range and died at the scene. An eyewitness later said that the eleven shots were fired over a thirty-second period, at three-second intervals. A separate witness reported hearing five shots, followed at an interval by several more shots." The Met lied through their teeth about the case of Mr de Menezes, to try to justify it. It was not justifiable, as the Met themselves finally accepted, but only after a protracted campaign by the family and others, during which, the Met continued to gaslight them. The eventual end was that: "in a joint statement with the family, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner made "a further unreserved apology to the family for the tragic death of Jean Charles de Menezes" and reiterated "that he was a totally innocent victim and in no way to blame for his untimely death"" Now I've read that it comes back to me. You're absolutely right, my first response was innacurate. Thanks for the reminder, appreciated. Disgraceful. Winston" It was. But its nothing to do with this case. De menezes wasn't driving a car which he didn't own and which had been used in a firearms offence a few days before and wasn't being pursued by police. Wait for the facts to be made available then we will know. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Trigger happy cops. Great.... Any idea how many people have been shot by the police in the last 3 years, and many armed responses they've attended? Trigger happy is the last thing our armed response units are. Winston Tell that to the family of Jean Charles da Silva e de Menezes." Exactly. Or the family of Harry Stanley. Just because it doesn't happen often doesn't mean it doesn't happen too often. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is this the same chap who was jailed in 2019 for firearms offences? Coincidence maybe " Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Is it okay to shoot someone with a criminal record then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is this the same chap who was jailed in 2019 for firearms offences? Coincidence maybe Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Is it okay to shoot someone with a criminal record then?" that could of been a factor in why he was shot not to mention the car had a marker against it for guess what yep guns | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is this the same chap who was jailed in 2019 for firearms offences? Coincidence maybe Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Is it okay to shoot someone with a criminal record then? that could of been a factor in why he was shot not to mention the car had a marker against it for guess what yep guns " I'm not sure, but are you suggesting he deserved it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is this the same chap who was jailed in 2019 for firearms offences? Coincidence maybe Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Is it okay to shoot someone with a criminal record then? that could of been a factor in why he was shot not to mention the car had a marker against it for guess what yep guns I'm not sure, but are you suggesting he deserved it?" I’ve suggested nothing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is this the same chap who was jailed in 2019 for firearms offences? Coincidence maybe Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Is it okay to shoot someone with a criminal record then? that could of been a factor in why he was shot not to mention the car had a marker against it for guess what yep guns I'm not sure, but are you suggesting he deserved it? I’ve suggested nothing " So what relevance was your comment about being previously jailed for firearms offences amd the marker on car? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If anything this has been an AMAZING filter thread All blacks are in gangs? Really? I wasn't aware Anyway regardless of your racist thoughts towards black people or your thoughts towards the police, a man died, a death that could of been avoided And it's awful Also 11 hours before informing the family is disgusting but given same of the history of police towards dead black people it doesn't surprise me " Yes some have gone on my Blocklist too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is this the same chap who was jailed in 2019 for firearms offences? Coincidence maybe Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Is it okay to shoot someone with a criminal record then? that could of been a factor in why he was shot not to mention the car had a marker against it for guess what yep guns I'm not sure, but are you suggesting he deserved it? I’ve suggested nothing So what relevance was your comment about being previously jailed for firearms offences amd the marker on car? " it’s in the public domain whats wrong with posting it on thread about him that’s the relevance or maybe we shouldn’t speak about the facts thats known I haven’t said anything untrue facts are facts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Don't know much but I do know that a person shouldn't be shot in the back while running away. How could they pose an immediate threat to life? " Yes agree with that. Was he shot in the back while running away then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't know all the facts. The car was recognized by the police, I think for a fire arm offence. Why was he in the car in the first place? Did he stop when asked? How was the shot fired? It's really easy to point blame when you don't know the facts" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not enough details have come out but no matter what they should put pressure for a investigation to happened to why he was shot and killed. It should also be publicly known so the public have a better understanding. Whether its racism or not taking someone life should be investigated." And that's what's happening isn't it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Interesting reading some of the comments in this thread now the truth has come out. Are those defending him going to admit they were wrong?" What was wrong? Known to be violent yes, still an unarmed man killed by police. Key word being unarmed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Interesting reading some of the comments in this thread now the truth has come out. Are those defending him going to admit they were wrong?" Well said... The police officer should never have been charged.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Interesting reading some of the comments in this thread now the truth has come out. Are those defending him going to admit they were wrong?" I'm going to have a guess... No. What's stupid is not allowing his track record to be presented in the recent trial of the police involved. Fortunately it's an underworld I have little knowledge or experience of. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Interesting reading some of the comments in this thread now the truth has come out. Are those defending him going to admit they were wrong? What was wrong? Known to be violent yes, still an unarmed man killed by police. Key word being unarmed " Armed still in the sense he was using his car to ram people with, which has now been clearly shown in footage. Cars kill especially when used in that way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wait for the investigation. A car can be a deadly weapon and we don’t know what exactly happened at the scene. I get the anger I get the distrust whether justice will be done. I was disgusted at Sky saying that perhaps the March were on their way to pay the queen respect. A few minutes on air wouldn’t have gone amiss. " Cars are deadly weapons: hence the drink drive campaigns, speed controls and strict tests for cars and drivers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Interesting reading some of the comments in this thread now the truth has come out. Are those defending him going to admit they were wrong? What was wrong? Known to be violent yes, still an unarmed man killed by police. Key word being unarmed Armed still in the sense he was using his car to ram people with, which has now been clearly shown in footage. Cars kill especially when used in that way. " How can you know if a driver is unarmed before a car is stopped and searched? Were they police expected to jump out of the way and let him go? What would you do in that cop's shoes. I'm not a fan of the police nor gangsters. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This may be the dumbest thread I ever do considering my views and how people usually get on these threads but I’m really interested in thoughts on this. In terms of how it looks? What wider consequences it has? I know there’s been protests, are those voices even being heard? I feel deflated, am I just being a woke snowflake?(I’m not even joking I feel that deflated). Please keep it classy. Keep it kind. But please share your thoughts. I feel like I’m living in a bubble and think there may be Justice so have come here to get a reality check. " Yes Steve. I’m from the future. Dumb thread. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Interesting reading some of the comments in this thread now the truth has come out. Are those defending him going to admit they were wrong? I'm going to have a guess... No. What's stupid is not allowing his track record to be presented in the recent trial of the police involved. Fortunately it's an underworld I have little knowledge or experience of. " I don’t think it should be. The deceased was not the person on trial. It’s the officers actions that were being tested. The jury heard the facts and decided that he was not guilty. If the deceased had stopped his car and followed the instructions of the police, he would still be alive. He chose otherwise. He was already facing a charge after shooting a man in a nightclub two nights earlier. This was why the police were trying to apprehend him. Their intelligence was that he is likely armed and dangerous, like he was two nights earlier. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Got what he deserved" Lets not go there. We don't want to end up with shoot outs like our American friends. But it is a lesson in waiting to find out the facts before stirring things up in social media. But summed up very nicely above. Black or otherwise he was driving a deadly weapon with a history of gun violence. It's an indictment of the state of the police that they brought a prosecution rather than supporting their officers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |