FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Cancelled football
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A minutes silence before kick-off Rule Britannia playing over the tannoy The whole crowd singing along. It would have been a fantastic and quite emotional way to both mourn and celebrate her life. My option is the FA totally miss-read the publics feelings. " Less than a week after the Manchester bombing, the Great North Run went ahead - with poetry, tributes, and spectators out in force to celebrate the city. It was unbelievably moving - and I agree that something like that would work well in this instance too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Selfish answer, but do not see how it's that big a mark of respect. Are we saying other sports are being disrespectful? " Did you watch the cup finals with a certain set of fans booing the national anthem? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A minutes silence before kick-off Rule Britannia playing over the tannoy The whole crowd singing along. It would have been a fantastic and quite emotional way to both mourn and celebrate her life. My option is the FA totally miss-read the publics feelings. Less than a week after the Manchester bombing, the Great North Run went ahead - with poetry, tributes, and spectators out in force to celebrate the city. It was unbelievably moving - and I agree that something like that would work well in this instance too. " I ran the London Marathon the week after the Boston bombings and the atmosphere was electric. Plenty of US flags and the running community at one with the victims. So I agree I think the tabloids and their potential outrage, played a part of the decision by the FA. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Selfish answer, but do not see how it's that big a mark of respect. Are we saying other sports are being disrespectful? Did you watch the cup finals with a certain set of fans booing the national anthem?" Sorry I misread your comment. I thought you were talking about the report that fans disrespecting the Queen was one of the reasons behind the postponement of games. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Should football have been cancelled this weekend.Although not a Royalist did find the tribute to the Queen at the Oval this morning quite moving,could this not have been repeated at football grounds and everyone having a minute’s silence would have been a better mark of respect." Would have thought minutes silence or whatever would have been enough. I don’t think everything needs to stop when it causes so much disruption. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Should football have been cancelled this weekend.Although not a Royalist did find the tribute to the Queen at the Oval this morning quite moving,could this not have been repeated at football grounds and everyone having a minute’s silence would have been a better mark of respect." those at the top do make some strange decisions last night they cancelled the highlights of the nfl match but put a film on with mel gibson as a womanising slob "what girls want" totally barmy,, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Prince William is president of the FA, that might have been a factor " I suspect too I'm seeing events in other sports being cancelled primarily on links to the Royal family (Royal parks fir example) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Prince William is president of the FA, that might have been a factor " official answer is it was because she "was a long-standing Patron of The Football Association and has left a lasting and indelible legacy on our national game." Don't ask me how. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Should be cancelled permanently." I have to agree! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Should be cancelled permanently." Edgy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Should be cancelled permanently. Edgy " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I suspect that in part this is down to the fact that (for reasons I don't understand but there's presumably a legitimate reason) that one of the requirements in Operation London Bridge was all police leave cancelled. And football has a significant demand on police resources, I'm guessing that a blanket cancellation may have just been easier from the FAs perspective?" This seems like a good point to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the premier league were in a tough spot they would get criticism either way and thought they would rather get criticism for not going ahead. Having said that IMO I think they should have gone ahead, with tributes " Yeah, this is pretty spot on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I suspect that in part this is down to the fact that (for reasons I don't understand but there's presumably a legitimate reason) that one of the requirements in Operation London Bridge was all police leave cancelled. And football has a significant demand on police resources, I'm guessing that a blanket cancellation may have just been easier from the FAs perspective?" I had exactly this conversation last night. I suspect the police resourcing had a lot to do with the decision. The FA were in a no win situation though, damned if they do, damned if they don't. Evidence of that in this very thread. I'm not sure all of the fans would have been capable of a minutes silence in any case. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It was to avoid distasteful chanting that has occurred at some matches since QEII passed. That could have escalated in something more serious. " I said as much earlier on the thread but it seems to be the awkward truth most football fans not just on here want to ignore. Will the vast majority of fans observe a minutes silence? 100% yes Dies history suggest that a significant minority of fans are an absolute disgrace and cannot be trusted to observe a minutes silence? Also 100% yes. Awaits someone to un-ironically suggest a minutes applause to drown out the idiots... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It was to avoid distasteful chanting that has occurred at some matches since QEII passed. That could have escalated in something more serious. I said as much earlier on the thread but it seems to be the awkward truth most football fans not just on here want to ignore. Will the vast majority of fans observe a minutes silence? 100% yes Dies history suggest that a significant minority of fans are an absolute disgrace and cannot be trusted to observe a minutes silence? Also 100% yes. Awaits someone to un-ironically suggest a minutes applause to drown out the idiots..." I think there is very much an undertone with this and other things - this is why we can't have nice things. Also here before "you anti royalists have no respect" - I would absolutely stand silently) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a terrible decision. A minute's silence or cheering and then the new national anthem would have been enough. " Is there gonna be a new National Anthem, or are we just changing Queen to King? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It was to avoid distasteful chanting that has occurred at some matches since QEII passed. That could have escalated in something more serious. " Odd that suddenly we're worried about bad taste at football games. Matches never get cancelled because fans sing abhorrent songs about disasters like Hillsborough, for example. Well, not odd. Obviously there are special rules for the special god chosen people who rule over us. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It was to avoid distasteful chanting that has occurred at some matches since QEII passed. That could have escalated in something more serious. Odd that suddenly we're worried about bad taste at football games. Matches never get cancelled because fans sing abhorrent songs about disasters like Hillsborough, for example. Well, not odd. Obviously there are special rules for the special god chosen people who rule over us. " Quite. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a terrible decision. A minute's silence or cheering and then the new national anthem would have been enough. Is there gonna be a new National Anthem, or are we just changing Queen to King? " It's not actually a national anthem; it's about one person. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i wouldn't be surprised that the increasing level of royalist virtue signalling and bullying over the next 10 days will cause an increasing backlash from those who are indifferent to the monarchy." I think calling people out fir celebrating the death of an old lady is neither virtue signalling nor bullying. Amd I'm very much indifferent tibher death but respect and dignity isn't that hard to find | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think it was a snap decision, rather than something properly thought out. Plenty of activities still going on around the Country and I’d understand if today was the actual funeral, then I’d expect the games to stop. But there’s nothing wrong with showing some respect at the kick off. " The Americans did and they've been independent since the colonial days ended. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If the football is not cancelled again next weekend there will very likely be a minutes silence at all the games. Which will be just kicking the can down the road regarding the twats that may try to ruin it." Exactly. The minutes silence is much more likely to be widely respected today, in the immediate aftermath of the event, than in 2 or 3 weeks time, when let's be honest, most people will have become bored of the blanket coverage and will just want to get on with their normal lives | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i wouldn't be surprised that the increasing level of royalist virtue signalling and bullying over the next 10 days will cause an increasing backlash from those who are indifferent to the monarchy. I think calling people out fir celebrating the death of an old lady is neither virtue signalling nor bullying. Amd I'm very much indifferent tibher death but respect and dignity isn't that hard to find" i fail to see why you have linked playing a game of football to celebrating the death of a monarch | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i wouldn't be surprised that the increasing level of royalist virtue signalling and bullying over the next 10 days will cause an increasing backlash from those who are indifferent to the monarchy." I’ve not got a problem with people who have no time for the monarchy but I do have a problem with people being nasty about the queen for example that nasty woman in Scotland the fish shop owner who thought it was a good idea to celebrate out side her shop and the silly tweet by some footballer sometimes it’s best to say nothing if you’ve nothing nice to say | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i wouldn't be surprised that the increasing level of royalist virtue signalling and bullying over the next 10 days will cause an increasing backlash from those who are indifferent to the monarchy. I’ve not got a problem with people who have no time for the monarchy but I do have a problem with people being nasty about the queen for example that nasty woman in Scotland the fish shop owner who thought it was a good idea to celebrate out side her shop and the silly tweet by some footballer sometimes it’s best to say nothing if you’ve nothing nice to say " so ban everything for the next 10 days just incase. that's an extremely totalitarian solution | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i wouldn't be surprised that the increasing level of royalist virtue signalling and bullying over the next 10 days will cause an increasing backlash from those who are indifferent to the monarchy. I’ve not got a problem with people who have no time for the monarchy but I do have a problem with people being nasty about the queen for example that nasty woman in Scotland the fish shop owner who thought it was a good idea to celebrate out side her shop and the silly tweet by some footballer sometimes it’s best to say nothing if you’ve nothing nice to say so ban everything for the next 10 days just incase. that's an extremely totalitarian solution" did I mention ban ? Unfortunately this free speech nonsense people think it gives them the go ahead to say anything and not be bothered if it causes offence imagine some stranger publicly stating that they are glad you’re relative has died | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i wouldn't be surprised that the increasing level of royalist virtue signalling and bullying over the next 10 days will cause an increasing backlash from those who are indifferent to the monarchy. I’ve not got a problem with people who have no time for the monarchy but I do have a problem with people being nasty about the queen for example that nasty woman in Scotland the fish shop owner who thought it was a good idea to celebrate out side her shop and the silly tweet by some footballer sometimes it’s best to say nothing if you’ve nothing nice to say so ban everything for the next 10 days just incase. that's an extremely totalitarian solution did I mention ban ? Unfortunately this free speech nonsense people think it gives them the go ahead to say anything and not be bothered if it causes offence imagine some stranger publicly stating that they are glad you’re relative has died " i disagree with the magnatude of your banning of mass sporting events with what a chip shop owner from the other end of the country is claimed to have done | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i wouldn't be surprised that the increasing level of royalist virtue signalling and bullying over the next 10 days will cause an increasing backlash from those who are indifferent to the monarchy. I’ve not got a problem with people who have no time for the monarchy but I do have a problem with people being nasty about the queen for example that nasty woman in Scotland the fish shop owner who thought it was a good idea to celebrate out side her shop and the silly tweet by some footballer sometimes it’s best to say nothing if you’ve nothing nice to say so ban everything for the next 10 days just incase. that's an extremely totalitarian solution did I mention ban ? Unfortunately this free speech nonsense people think it gives them the go ahead to say anything and not be bothered if it causes offence imagine some stranger publicly stating that they are glad you’re relative has died " That's the nature of free speech, you either support it or you don't. You can't claim to support free speech, but only "if it doesn't offend me" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i wouldn't be surprised that the increasing level of royalist virtue signalling and bullying over the next 10 days will cause an increasing backlash from those who are indifferent to the monarchy. I’ve not got a problem with people who have no time for the monarchy but I do have a problem with people being nasty about the queen for example that nasty woman in Scotland the fish shop owner who thought it was a good idea to celebrate out side her shop and the silly tweet by some footballer sometimes it’s best to say nothing if you’ve nothing nice to say so ban everything for the next 10 days just incase. that's an extremely totalitarian solution did I mention ban ? Unfortunately this free speech nonsense people think it gives them the go ahead to say anything and not be bothered if it causes offence imagine some stranger publicly stating that they are glad you’re relative has died i disagree with the magnatude of your banning of mass sporting events with what a chip shop owner from the other end of the country is claimed to have done" again you mention banning | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i wouldn't be surprised that the increasing level of royalist virtue signalling and bullying over the next 10 days will cause an increasing backlash from those who are indifferent to the monarchy. I’ve not got a problem with people who have no time for the monarchy but I do have a problem with people being nasty about the queen for example that nasty woman in Scotland the fish shop owner who thought it was a good idea to celebrate out side her shop and the silly tweet by some footballer sometimes it’s best to say nothing if you’ve nothing nice to say so ban everything for the next 10 days just incase. that's an extremely totalitarian solution" Well no let's vancrl the sport whose fans repeatedly disgrace themselves. There's a reason cricket abd rugby are still on and to quote _naswingdress this is why you can't gave nice things | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i wouldn't be surprised that the increasing level of royalist virtue signalling and bullying over the next 10 days will cause an increasing backlash from those who are indifferent to the monarchy. I’ve not got a problem with people who have no time for the monarchy but I do have a problem with people being nasty about the queen for example that nasty woman in Scotland the fish shop owner who thought it was a good idea to celebrate out side her shop and the silly tweet by some footballer sometimes it’s best to say nothing if you’ve nothing nice to say so ban everything for the next 10 days just incase. that's an extremely totalitarian solution did I mention ban ? Unfortunately this free speech nonsense people think it gives them the go ahead to say anything and not be bothered if it causes offence imagine some stranger publicly stating that they are glad you’re relative has died That's the nature of free speech, you either support it or you don't. You can't claim to support free speech, but only "if it doesn't offend me"" exactly. those that disagree with the banning of todays games are forced to agree with those who have banned them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Agreed! I’m a bit bored now…. " Sorry her majesty died and upset your tv viewing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i wouldn't be surprised that the increasing level of royalist virtue signalling and bullying over the next 10 days will cause an increasing backlash from those who are indifferent to the monarchy. I’ve not got a problem with people who have no time for the monarchy but I do have a problem with people being nasty about the queen for example that nasty woman in Scotland the fish shop owner who thought it was a good idea to celebrate out side her shop and the silly tweet by some footballer sometimes it’s best to say nothing if you’ve nothing nice to say so ban everything for the next 10 days just incase. that's an extremely totalitarian solution did I mention ban ? Unfortunately this free speech nonsense people think it gives them the go ahead to say anything and not be bothered if it causes offence imagine some stranger publicly stating that they are glad you’re relative has died That's the nature of free speech, you either support it or you don't. You can't claim to support free speech, but only "if it doesn't offend me" exactly. those that disagree with the banning of todays games are forced to agree with those who have banned them." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I’m not a fan of a silence as mentioned above you always get one person who shouts I think an applause is sufficient " i agree with this, it both gives a choice to join in or not without any embarassment for any party. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wtf does this have to do with free speech? FFS " I'm not sure, I was just responding to someone who stated "this free speech nonsense" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wtf does this have to do with free speech? FFS I'm not sure, I was just responding to someone who stated "this free speech nonsense"" Yeah, whoever said it Person A can say we should worship the Queen Person B can say that it's all a load of tosh. Free speech isn't altered in the slightest. A private body has postponed its games. That's not speech and it doesn't stop us speaking. We're speaking about it right now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wtf does this have to do with free speech? FFS I'm not sure, I was just responding to someone who stated "this free speech nonsense"" free speech a term used when people want to say something downright nasty or racist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a terrible decision. A minute's silence or cheering and then the new national anthem would have been enough. Is there gonna be a new National Anthem, or are we just changing Queen to King? It's not actually a national anthem; it's about one person." So your point is? Of course it's a National Anthem, dreary as it is, maybe you could compose a new one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wtf does this have to do with free speech? FFS I'm not sure, I was just responding to someone who stated "this free speech nonsense" Yeah, whoever said it Person A can say we should worship the Queen Person B can say that it's all a load of tosh. Free speech isn't altered in the slightest. A private body has postponed its games. That's not speech and it doesn't stop us speaking. We're speaking about it right now." I think we're agreeing with each other? However, I would say that I think one of the reasons that the games have been postponed is that the authorities don't want to give a platform for a very small minority of football fans to exercise their right of free speech, by not toeing the party line on respecting the Queens death. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wtf does this have to do with free speech? FFS I'm not sure, I was just responding to someone who stated "this free speech nonsense" free speech a term used when people want to say something downright nasty or racist " Or "someone has used their free speech to disagree with me" or "I can't do what I want, whether it's speech or not" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wtf does this have to do with free speech? FFS I'm not sure, I was just responding to someone who stated "this free speech nonsense" Yeah, whoever said it Person A can say we should worship the Queen Person B can say that it's all a load of tosh. Free speech isn't altered in the slightest. A private body has postponed its games. That's not speech and it doesn't stop us speaking. We're speaking about it right now. I think we're agreeing with each other? However, I would say that I think one of the reasons that the games have been postponed is that the authorities don't want to give a platform for a very small minority of football fans to exercise their right of free speech, by not toeing the party line on respecting the Queens death. " Yes, we're absolutely agreeing. (Side note - free speech doesn't include the guarantee of a platform of your choosing. If you come into my house and insult my mother, I'm not depriving you of your free speech if I throw you out) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wtf does this have to do with free speech? FFS I'm not sure, I was just responding to someone who stated "this free speech nonsense" free speech a term used when people want to say something downright nasty or racist " i'm not sure why you brought up the subject of free speech in the first place to be honest. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wtf does this have to do with free speech? FFS I'm not sure, I was just responding to someone who stated "this free speech nonsense" Yeah, whoever said it Person A can say we should worship the Queen Person B can say that it's all a load of tosh. Free speech isn't altered in the slightest. A private body has postponed its games. That's not speech and it doesn't stop us speaking. We're speaking about it right now. I think we're agreeing with each other? However, I would say that I think one of the reasons that the games have been postponed is that the authorities don't want to give a platform for a very small minority of football fans to exercise their right of free speech, by not toeing the party line on respecting the Queens death. Yes, we're absolutely agreeing. (Side note - free speech doesn't include the guarantee of a platform of your choosing. If you come into my house and insult my mother, I'm not depriving you of your free speech if I throw you out)" 100% agree | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The cancellation of football seems a little bit classist to me. Cricket can continue, rugger can go on, but football should stop. Your government are the ones who told (or "consulted") with the football governing bodies and wanted no football this weekend. It would not take many fans chanting something during a minutes silence to make the news and bring shame to the UK. To me it seems like the working classes can't be trusted, at least by the people at the top" That's true. It's no doubt multifaceted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The cancellation of football seems a little bit classist to me. Cricket can continue, rugger can go on, but football should stop. Your government are the ones who told (or "consulted") with the football governing bodies and wanted no football this weekend. It would not take many fans chanting something during a minutes silence to make the news and bring shame to the UK. To me it seems like the working classes can't be trusted, at least by the people at the top" Well if the cap fits ......... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The cancellation of football seems a little bit classist to me. Cricket can continue, rugger can go on, but football should stop. Your government are the ones who told (or "consulted") with the football governing bodies and wanted no football this weekend. It would not take many fans chanting something during a minutes silence to make the news and bring shame to the UK. To me it seems like the working classes can't be trusted, at least by the people at the top Well if the cap fits ........." Ah but this is what feeds the disenfranchisement of people from their society. If some football fans chanted something disrespectful at a game they would police themselves. The majority would let their feeling be known and then you get a true reflection of how the people feel about their queen. Instead you get nothing and no idea and the vocal minority win. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And all it would take is some moron to playup during the minutes silence live on tv and bingo the Tabloids have got their chance to smear football adinfinitum .sensible descision from the football authority's to prevent reputational damage tho why football at youth and amature level could not go ahead escapes me " Football is more than capable of smearing itself with all the cheating, falling over pretending to be hurt, no respect for referees and line staff etc etc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And free speech is the right to speak your mind, not to be insulting, disrespectful or the right to say what you want regardless of truth or law. Free speech gives me the right to say I don't like potatoes not that potatoes are all shite bags and pedophiles and deserve to die. " I think free speech includes the right to say insulting or disrespectful things (there are forbidden things but they're narrower than that). It also includes the right for people to react to opinions they find distasteful. That's discourse (civil or otherwise). I think it is within free speech to say "paedophiles are pieces of shit" but not "Mr X is a paedophile and a piece of shit" (the latter being defamatory). But there's no right to say anything in a place of your choosing, and the football being on is independent of the right to speak. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The cancellation of football seems a little bit classist to me. Cricket can continue, rugger can go on, but football should stop. Your government are the ones who told (or "consulted") with the football governing bodies and wanted no football this weekend. It would not take many fans chanting something during a minutes silence to make the news and bring shame to the UK. To me it seems like the working classes can't be trusted, at least by the people at the top Well if the cap fits ......... Ah but this is what feeds the disenfranchisement of people from their society. If some football fans chanted something disrespectful at a game they would police themselves. The majority would let their feeling be known and then you get a true reflection of how the people feel about their queen. Instead you get nothing and no idea and the vocal minority win. " Indeed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The cancellation of football seems a little bit classist to me. Cricket can continue, rugger can go on, but football should stop. Your government are the ones who told (or "consulted") with the football governing bodies and wanted no football this weekend. It would not take many fans chanting something during a minutes silence to make the news and bring shame to the UK. To me it seems like the working classes can't be trusted, at least by the people at the top" Haven’t read the rest of the thread but Is it not to do with security/policing? Aren’t there more football matches than cricket and rugby matches and usually more police at the football games? Maybe the police are needed elsewhere this weekend. Just a thought | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The cancellation of football seems a little bit classist to me. Cricket can continue, rugger can go on, but football should stop. Your government are the ones who told (or "consulted") with the football governing bodies and wanted no football this weekend. It would not take many fans chanting something during a minutes silence to make the news and bring shame to the UK. To me it seems like the working classes can't be trusted, at least by the people at the top Well if the cap fits ......... Ah but this is what feeds the disenfranchisement of people from their society. If some football fans chanted something disrespectful at a game they would police themselves. The majority would let their feeling be known and then you get a true reflection of how the people feel about their queen. Instead you get nothing and no idea and the vocal minority win. " I agree, but how is that Rugby and Cricket fans can be counted on to behave responsibly, but it seems not Football fans (even by their own official Body)? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The cancellation of football seems a little bit classist to me. Cricket can continue, rugger can go on, but football should stop. Your government are the ones who told (or "consulted") with the football governing bodies and wanted no football this weekend. It would not take many fans chanting something during a minutes silence to make the news and bring shame to the UK. To me it seems like the working classes can't be trusted, at least by the people at the top Haven’t read the rest of the thread but Is it not to do with security/policing? Aren’t there more football matches than cricket and rugby matches and usually more police at the football games? Maybe the police are needed elsewhere this weekend. Just a thought " Next weekend, especially in London, that may be a valid point. This weekend, I don't think it holds water as an argument. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ... Is it not to do with security/policing? Aren’t there more football matches than cricket and rugby matches and usually more police at the football games? Maybe the police are needed elsewhere this weekend. Just a thought " why this weekend in particular? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The cancellation of football seems a little bit classist to me. Cricket can continue, rugger can go on, but football should stop. Your government are the ones who told (or "consulted") with the football governing bodies and wanted no football this weekend. It would not take many fans chanting something during a minutes silence to make the news and bring shame to the UK. To me it seems like the working classes can't be trusted, at least by the people at the top Well if the cap fits ......... Ah but this is what feeds the disenfranchisement of people from their society. If some football fans chanted something disrespectful at a game they would police themselves. The majority would let their feeling be known and then you get a true reflection of how the people feel about their queen. Instead you get nothing and no idea and the vocal minority win. I agree, but how is that Rugby and Cricket fans can be counted on to behave responsibly, but it seems not Football fans (even by their own official Body)?" Maybe I’m being naive but aren’t footballs fans around the world kinda know as being complete cunts? Rugby and cricket are not only smaller turn outs, I don’t think the fans are as much hooligans like footballs Is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ... Is it not to do with security/policing? Aren’t there more football matches than cricket and rugby matches and usually more police at the football games? Maybe the police are needed elsewhere this weekend. Just a thought why this weekend in particular? " Aren’t all the royal residences packed with people? Haven’t seen much but from what I’ve seen it seems like it. Wont that need policing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The cancellation of football seems a little bit classist to me. Cricket can continue, rugger can go on, but football should stop. Your government are the ones who told (or "consulted") with the football governing bodies and wanted no football this weekend. It would not take many fans chanting something during a minutes silence to make the news and bring shame to the UK. To me it seems like the working classes can't be trusted, at least by the people at the top Well if the cap fits ......... Ah but this is what feeds the disenfranchisement of people from their society. If some football fans chanted something disrespectful at a game they would police themselves. The majority would let their feeling be known and then you get a true reflection of how the people feel about their queen. Instead you get nothing and no idea and the vocal minority win. I agree, but how is that Rugby and Cricket fans can be counted on to behave responsibly, but it seems not Football fans (even by their own official Body)? Maybe I’m being naive but aren’t footballs fans around the world kinda know as being complete cunts? Rugby and cricket are not only smaller turn outs, I don’t think the fans are as much hooligans like footballs Is " sadly football fans do have a reputation having said that fair play to the fans who went to the games on Thursday night they behaved impeccably | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ... Is it not to do with security/policing? Aren’t there more football matches than cricket and rugby matches and usually more police at the football games? Maybe the police are needed elsewhere this weekend. Just a thought why this weekend in particular? Aren’t all the royal residences packed with people? Haven’t seen much but from what I’ve seen it seems like it. Wont that need policing?" stewarding maybe, but policing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ... Is it not to do with security/policing? Aren’t there more football matches than cricket and rugby matches and usually more police at the football games? Maybe the police are needed elsewhere this weekend. Just a thought why this weekend in particular? Aren’t all the royal residences packed with people? Haven’t seen much but from what I’ve seen it seems like it. Wont that need policing? stewarding maybe, but policing?" Ok. Like I said was just a thought | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"fair play to the fans who went to the games on Thursday night they behaved impeccably " that undermines the reasons for the ban on todays games | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"fair play to the fans who went to the games on Thursday night they behaved impeccably that undermines the reasons for the ban on todays games" ban ?? Postponed surely | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The cancellation of football seems a little bit classist to me. Cricket can continue, rugger can go on, but football should stop. Your government are the ones who told (or "consulted") with the football governing bodies and wanted no football this weekend. It would not take many fans chanting something during a minutes silence to make the news and bring shame to the UK. To me it seems like the working classes can't be trusted, at least by the people at the top Well if the cap fits ......... Ah but this is what feeds the disenfranchisement of people from their society. If some football fans chanted something disrespectful at a game they would police themselves. The majority would let their feeling be known and then you get a true reflection of how the people feel about their queen. Instead you get nothing and no idea and the vocal minority win. I agree, but how is that Rugby and Cricket fans can be counted on to behave responsibly, but it seems not Football fans (even by their own official Body)?" Well no one actually goes to cricket. And if they do they are usually older, middle class conservative types or children. Football is tribal. You are a (insert club here) fan first and foremost. A football fan second. Rugby is different. Rugby is the tribe. And Rugby isn't about chants and songs. It's about anthems. That the difference between the sports. But You and the government and the people who run football (not exactly the type of people who grew up in an estate in Birmingham) ASSUME that football fans can't be trusted. That's why it's classist. Rather than potentially disrespect the memory of one person, it's better to disrespect the people who go to football matches. Would you want to be of a pro royal disposition at a Glasgow celtic match? I can't imagine how offensive they would be. But they will be offensive regardless, this weekend or next. And if people in Liverpool, Manchester or Birmingham who feel disenfranchised by the counrty they are part of, they will make their feelings known. This week or next. The only difference is that this week the world would know that the Queen was not universally loved and next week only the bbc and sky news would know. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The cancellation of football seems a little bit classist to me. Cricket can continue, rugger can go on, but football should stop. Your government are the ones who told (or "consulted") with the football governing bodies and wanted no football this weekend. It would not take many fans chanting something during a minutes silence to make the news and bring shame to the UK. To me it seems like the working classes can't be trusted, at least by the people at the top Well if the cap fits ......... Ah but this is what feeds the disenfranchisement of people from their society. If some football fans chanted something disrespectful at a game they would police themselves. The majority would let their feeling be known and then you get a true reflection of how the people feel about their queen. Instead you get nothing and no idea and the vocal minority win. I agree, but how is that Rugby and Cricket fans can be counted on to behave responsibly, but it seems not Football fans (even by their own official Body)? Well no one actually goes to cricket. And if they do they are usually older, middle class conservative types or children. Football is tribal. You are a (insert club here) fan first and foremost. A football fan second. Rugby is different. Rugby is the tribe. And Rugby isn't about chants and songs. It's about anthems. That the difference between the sports. But You and the government and the people who run football (not exactly the type of people who grew up in an estate in Birmingham) ASSUME that football fans can't be trusted. That's why it's classist. Rather than potentially disrespect the memory of one person, it's better to disrespect the people who go to football matches. Would you want to be of a pro royal disposition at a Glasgow celtic match? I can't imagine how offensive they would be. But they will be offensive regardless, this weekend or next. And if people in Liverpool, Manchester or Birmingham who feel disenfranchised by the counrty they are part of, they will make their feelings known. This week or next. The only difference is that this week the world would know that the Queen was not universally loved and next week only the bbc and sky news would know. " Yeah I’m sure the world is waiting on baited breath to hear how much a cunt the queen was from a bunch of boozed up football hooligans | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The cancellation of football seems a little bit classist to me. Cricket can continue, rugger can go on, but football should stop. Your government are the ones who told (or "consulted") with the football governing bodies and wanted no football this weekend. It would not take many fans chanting something during a minutes silence to make the news and bring shame to the UK. To me it seems like the working classes can't be trusted, at least by the people at the top Well if the cap fits ......... Ah but this is what feeds the disenfranchisement of people from their society. If some football fans chanted something disrespectful at a game they would police themselves. The majority would let their feeling be known and then you get a true reflection of how the people feel about their queen. Instead you get nothing and no idea and the vocal minority win. I agree, but how is that Rugby and Cricket fans can be counted on to behave responsibly, but it seems not Football fans (even by their own official Body)? Well no one actually goes to cricket. And if they do they are usually older, middle class conservative types or children. Football is tribal. You are a (insert club here) fan first and foremost. A football fan second. Rugby is different. Rugby is the tribe. And Rugby isn't about chants and songs. It's about anthems. That the difference between the sports. But You and the government and the people who run football (not exactly the type of people who grew up in an estate in Birmingham) ASSUME that football fans can't be trusted. That's why it's classist. Rather than potentially disrespect the memory of one person, it's better to disrespect the people who go to football matches. Would you want to be of a pro royal disposition at a Glasgow celtic match? I can't imagine how offensive they would be. But they will be offensive regardless, this weekend or next. And if people in Liverpool, Manchester or Birmingham who feel disenfranchised by the counrty they are part of, they will make their feelings known. This week or next. The only difference is that this week the world would know that the Queen was not universally loved and next week only the bbc and sky news would know. " i disagree. both cricket and rugby have displayed as much d*unken loutish behaviour from those in attendance for a number of years, not to mention mass brawls at horse racing events. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Should football have been cancelled this weekend.Although not a Royalist did find the tribute to the Queen at the Oval this morning quite moving,could this not have been repeated at football grounds and everyone having a minute’s silence would have been a better mark of respect." With the funeral now set for next Monday I am guessing next weekend’s fixtures will likely be cancelled as all spare police are going to sent to London for safety reasons | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think it should've been cancelled as I don't think it really shows respect in anyway and the people who work through the week who love watching football are essentially put into forced mourning. I also feel sorry for those you have paid for travel and accommodation only to have the match cancelled." not to mention those who rely on the wages they earn from jobs related to match day events. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Should football have been cancelled this weekend.Although not a Royalist did find the tribute to the Queen at the Oval this morning quite moving,could this not have been repeated at football grounds and everyone having a minute’s silence would have been a better mark of respect. With the funeral now set for next Monday I am guessing next weekend’s fixtures will likely be cancelled as all spare police are going to sent to London for safety reasons " Call the army in then? Just in caser of a any civil unrest or crimes? Yikes, what a horrible thought! I'll be crossing my fingers & praying then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think it should've been cancelled as I don't think it really shows respect in anyway and the people who work through the week who love watching football are essentially put into forced mourning. I also feel sorry for those you have paid for travel and accommodation only to have the match cancelled. not to mention those who rely on the wages they earn from jobs related to match day events." Another important point - the hospitality industry too stand to make significant losses off the back of cancelled games, at a time when they are struggling to recover from lockdowns, and dealing with the cost of living crisis | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Call the army in then? Just in caser of a any civil unrest or crimes? Yikes, what a horrible thought! I'll be crossing my fingers & praying then? " martial law wouldn't be a very good look for the country right now maybe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We went down to Buckingham palace last night. We were speaking to quite a few of the police officers down there and one of them told us 1 of the reasons the football has been cancelled is because Particularly in London they are having to deal with an extreme number of people visiting the city particularly Buckingham palace. A lot of the reasons is because of policing and crowd control. " I’ve heard this too, I’m sure this was a big factor | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled." British weightlifting cancelled this weekend. It was the British open. Countless athletes will have trained for this, then paid for hotels and travel, and they cancelled it. Zero respect Don’t even get me started on the bank holiday coming up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled." Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? " I'm aware of that. I doubt very much that they held a vote with the players on whether or not they wanted to play. Or the rest of the staff, many of which relying on the wage. Assuming here that no work may equal no pay.c | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? I'm aware of that. I doubt very much that they held a vote with the players on whether or not they wanted to play. Or the rest of the staff, many of which relying on the wage. Assuming here that no work may equal no pay.c" Maybe rather than speculating just except this is a once in a lifetime event and the Queen was our head of state. We are one of the few countries that when our head of state dies we don't automatically close everything down. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"without anyone being in attendance of the meeting between the DCMS and the FA, the responsibility for todays ban is pure conjecture." It isn't a ban there is no ban on football. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? " Don't think that's true. All football has been suspended by the FA, including grass roots kids football. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? Don't think that's true. All football has been suspended by the FA, including grass roots kids football. " That's not true as there were children's football matches happening at the local pitch today. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? Don't think that's true. All football has been suspended by the FA, including grass roots kids football. " That was the FA's decision. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"demanding blind acceptance appears as bullying people into not debating what's happened." Who is bullying anyone in to anything. You are wrong to say there is a ban on football because there is not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? I'm aware of that. I doubt very much that they held a vote with the players on whether or not they wanted to play. Or the rest of the staff, many of which relying on the wage. Assuming here that no work may equal no pay.c Maybe rather than speculating just except this is a once in a lifetime event and the Queen was our head of state. We are one of the few countries that when our head of state dies we don't automatically close everything down. " My point really is that I feel there are better ways we can show respect. My initial comment is too express why I feel shutting down is the wrong choice. Several small businesses took a big hit in the current climate. That to me is not expressing any form of respect. There have to be better ways. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? I'm aware of that. I doubt very much that they held a vote with the players on whether or not they wanted to play. Or the rest of the staff, many of which relying on the wage. Assuming here that no work may equal no pay.c Maybe rather than speculating just except this is a once in a lifetime event and the Queen was our head of state. We are one of the few countries that when our head of state dies we don't automatically close everything down. My point really is that I feel there are better ways we can show respect. My initial comment is too express why I feel shutting down is the wrong choice. Several small businesses took a big hit in the current climate. That to me is not expressing any form of respect. There have to be better ways. " What better ways? I haven't heard any local businesses close to football stadiums complaining have you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? Don't think that's true. All football has been suspended by the FA, including grass roots kids football. That's not true as there were children's football matches happening at the local pitch today. " It is true. It’s all football including non league and grassroots | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? Don't think that's true. All football has been suspended by the FA, including grass roots kids football. That's not true as there were children's football matches happening at the local pitch today. It is true. It’s all football including non league and grassroots " Well I am telling you there was a match local to us today. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"demanding blind acceptance appears as bullying people into not debating what's happened. Who is bullying anyone in to anything. You are wrong to say there is a ban on football because there is not. " A quick Google search will tell you otherwise. If there was a kids football game going on, they're defying the FA, so could be severely punished (relatively speaking) Or it wasn't an official cup or league game. You don't what you're talking about. Sorry, not sorry. I see you Lorna, think a lot of us do on the forums. Where's your next argument. Facebook or Twitter? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? I'm aware of that. I doubt very much that they held a vote with the players on whether or not they wanted to play. Or the rest of the staff, many of which relying on the wage. Assuming here that no work may equal no pay.c Maybe rather than speculating just except this is a once in a lifetime event and the Queen was our head of state. We are one of the few countries that when our head of state dies we don't automatically close everything down. My point really is that I feel there are better ways we can show respect. My initial comment is too express why I feel shutting down is the wrong choice. Several small businesses took a big hit in the current climate. That to me is not expressing any form of respect. There have to be better ways. What better ways? I haven't heard any local businesses close to football stadiums complaining have you? " What has that got to do with my initial comment? Either discuss that or stay away, don't keep putting a twist on it I'll repeat, I'm speaking of their small, local businesses I've mentioned as an example, that I know have taken a hit. In this current climate, that's a big hit. We could have celebrated her life during that event But I already suggested that and that was already ignored to switch the conversation to other things You're not going to change my mind on this, you're only reinforcing my viewpoint with you attempt to sway conversation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? I'm aware of that. I doubt very much that they held a vote with the players on whether or not they wanted to play. Or the rest of the staff, many of which relying on the wage. Assuming here that no work may equal no pay.c Maybe rather than speculating just except this is a once in a lifetime event and the Queen was our head of state. We are one of the few countries that when our head of state dies we don't automatically close everything down. My point really is that I feel there are better ways we can show respect. My initial comment is too express why I feel shutting down is the wrong choice. Several small businesses took a big hit in the current climate. That to me is not expressing any form of respect. There have to be better ways. What better ways? I haven't heard any local businesses close to football stadiums complaining have you? What has that got to do with my initial comment? Either discuss that or stay away, don't keep putting a twist on it I'll repeat, I'm speaking of their small, local businesses I've mentioned as an example, that I know have taken a hit. In this current climate, that's a big hit. We could have celebrated her life during that event But I already suggested that and that was already ignored to switch the conversation to other things You're not going to change my mind on this, you're only reinforcing my viewpoint with you attempt to sway conversation. " I haven't put a twist on anything I am asking you a question you can choose whether to answer it or not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? Don't think that's true. All football has been suspended by the FA, including grass roots kids football. That's not true as there were children's football matches happening at the local pitch today. It is true. It’s all football including non league and grassroots Well I am telling you there was a match local to us today. " Ok lol. Not everyone sticks to the rules | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Jesus Christ!! A little respect is all that's happening and people are getting their knickers in a twist. Maybe just maybe if people started showing a bit of pride and respect towards our country and the monarchy instead of distain and contempt we maybe able to start treating each other a bit better and move away from this selfish me me me society that we have become. She lived her entire live in service for the country and representing the people. She never asked for it but did so extremely well. So the suspension of some football matches is hardly a lot to ask. " Do the Royal family cancel engagements if one of my family dies? Or does 'respect' only go one way? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Jesus Christ!! A little respect is all that's happening and people are getting their knickers in a twist. Maybe just maybe if people started showing a bit of pride and respect towards our country and the monarchy instead of distain and contempt we maybe able to start treating each other a bit better and move away from this selfish me me me society that we have become. She lived her entire live in service for the country and representing the people. She never asked for it but did so extremely well. So the suspension of some football matches is hardly a lot to ask. " unfortunately that’s way of some it’s all me me me selfish pricks most of them I seen someone on here moaning that their tv schedule had been ruined | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"demanding blind acceptance appears as bullying people into not debating what's happened. Who is bullying anyone in to anything. You are wrong to say there is a ban on football because there is not. A quick Google search will tell you otherwise. If there was a kids football game going on, they're defying the FA, so could be severely punished (relatively speaking) Or it wasn't an official cup or league game. You don't what you're talking about. Sorry, not sorry. I see you Lorna, think a lot of us do on the forums. Where's your next argument. Facebook or Twitter?" I'm allowed to disagree with you without you making things personal. I'm sure lots of people do see me because I'm literally here commenting I'm not sure what your point is but let's keep it pleasant please. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"demanding blind acceptance appears as bullying people into not debating what's happened. Who is bullying anyone in to anything. You are wrong to say there is a ban on football because there is not. A quick Google search will tell you otherwise. If there was a kids football game going on, they're defying the FA, so could be severely punished (relatively speaking) Or it wasn't an official cup or league game. You don't what you're talking about. Sorry, not sorry. I see you Lorna, think a lot of us do on the forums. Where's your next argument. Facebook or Twitter? I'm allowed to disagree with you without you making things personal. I'm sure lots of people do see me because I'm literally here commenting I'm not sure what your point is but let's keep it pleasant please. " But were you right or is he? Is there a ban or not? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"demanding blind acceptance appears as bullying people into not debating what's happened. Who is bullying anyone in to anything. You are wrong to say there is a ban on football because there is not. A quick Google search will tell you otherwise. If there was a kids football game going on, they're defying the FA, so could be severely punished (relatively speaking) Or it wasn't an official cup or league game. You don't what you're talking about. Sorry, not sorry. I see you Lorna, think a lot of us do on the forums. Where's your next argument. Facebook or Twitter?" To be fair they’re not using the words ban. They’re using the words postpone and cancel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"demanding blind acceptance appears as bullying people into not debating what's happened. Who is bullying anyone in to anything. You are wrong to say there is a ban on football because there is not. A quick Google search will tell you otherwise. If there was a kids football game going on, they're defying the FA, so could be severely punished (relatively speaking) Or it wasn't an official cup or league game. You don't what you're talking about. Sorry, not sorry. I see you Lorna, think a lot of us do on the forums. Where's your next argument. Facebook or Twitter? To be fair they’re not using the words ban. They’re using the words postpone and cancel. " Thank you, That's exactly what I meant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i think despite the ban on games today it's up to the individual to express their feeling for the queens death and not for monarchists to demand respect to be paid in the way that they believe is fitting." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Jesus Christ!! A little respect is all that's happening and people are getting their knickers in a twist. Maybe just maybe if people started showing a bit of pride and respect towards our country and the monarchy instead of distain and contempt we maybe able to start treating each other a bit better and move away from this selfish me me me society that we have become. She lived her entire live in service for the country and representing the people. She never asked for it but did so extremely well. So the suspension of some football matches is hardly a lot to ask. Do the Royal family cancel engagements if one of my family dies? Or does 'respect' only go one way?" I'm pretty sure that if the queen had known a member of your family for over 70years yes. But no arguing with some people. So I assume you will be forfeiting your bank holiday and carrying on as normal on Monday the 19th? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i think despite the ban on games today it's up to the individual to express their feeling for the queens death and not for monarchists to demand respect to be paid in the way that they believe is fitting. " What has the monarch demanded? It has been made very clear nothing is expected to stop or close it is up to individual associations, Businesses and organisations to decide what to do. Nothing to do with what the monarchy has demanded at all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i think despite the ban on games today it's up to the individual to express their feeling for the queens death and not for monarchists to demand respect to be paid in the way that they believe is fitting. What has the monarch demanded? It has been made very clear nothing is expected to stop or close it is up to individual associations, Businesses and organisations to decide what to do. Nothing to do with what the monarchy has demanded at all. " This is true also. The FA made this decision. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Jesus Christ!! A little respect is all that's happening and people are getting their knickers in a twist. Maybe just maybe if people started showing a bit of pride and respect towards our country and the monarchy instead of distain and contempt we maybe able to start treating each other a bit better and move away from this selfish me me me society that we have become. She lived her entire live in service for the country and representing the people. She never asked for it but did so extremely well. So the suspension of some football matches is hardly a lot to ask. " I get that, but it's easy to see why having multiple days dedicated to the life one person that can affect the day to day lives of the many can rub them the wrong way. It's sad that she passed away but we don't need an enforced mourning period for days and days. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i think despite the ban on games today it's up to the individual to express their feeling for the queens death and not for monarchists to demand respect to be paid in the way that they believe is fitting. What has the monarch demanded? It has been made very clear nothing is expected to stop or close it is up to individual associations, Businesses and organisations to decide what to do. Nothing to do with what the monarchy has demanded at all. This is true also. The FA made this decision. " Are we agreeing! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"demanding blind acceptance appears as bullying people into not debating what's happened. Who is bullying anyone in to anything. You are wrong to say there is a ban on football because there is not. A quick Google search will tell you otherwise. If there was a kids football game going on, they're defying the FA, so could be severely punished (relatively speaking) Or it wasn't an official cup or league game. You don't what you're talking about. Sorry, not sorry. I see you Lorna, think a lot of us do on the forums. Where's your next argument. Facebook or Twitter? I'm allowed to disagree with you without you making things personal. I'm sure lots of people do see me because I'm literally here commenting I'm not sure what your point is but let's keep it pleasant please. " Some people are not interested in talking but in getting responses from others. It's an insecurity in them. Makes them feel powerful. Manly. I'm not telling you to ignore them lorna. Follow your conscience. But I ersonally wouldn't waste any time on them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What has the monarch demanded? It has been made very clear nothing is expected to stop or close it is up to individual associations, Businesses and organisations to decide what to do. Nothing to do with what the monarchy has demanded at all. " it's clear that you haven't read what i wrote there. i said monarchists not monarch or monarchy for that matter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i think despite the ban on games today it's up to the individual to express their feeling for the queens death and not for monarchists to demand respect to be paid in the way that they believe is fitting. What has the monarch demanded? It has been made very clear nothing is expected to stop or close it is up to individual associations, Businesses and organisations to decide what to do. Nothing to do with what the monarchy has demanded at all. This is true also. The FA made this decision. Are we agreeing! " it won’t last! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i think despite the ban on games today it's up to the individual to express their feeling for the queens death and not for monarchists to demand respect to be paid in the way that they believe is fitting." I agree.. And equally some need to accept that however much they dislike the monarchy and the system we have which has its faults, when the Nation has lost its longest serving Queen there will be changes albeit temporary to the norm.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What has the monarch demanded? It has been made very clear nothing is expected to stop or close it is up to individual associations, Businesses and organisations to decide what to do. Nothing to do with what the monarchy has demanded at all. it's clear that you haven't read what i wrote there. i said monarchists not monarch or monarchy for that matter." Not monarchists either is it though? because as far as I can see nobody has been demanding anything it is just what the fa has decided to do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm pretty sure that if the queen had known a member of your family for over 70years yes. But no arguing with some people. So I assume you will be forfeiting your bank holiday and carrying on as normal on Monday the 19th?" I'm very sure they wouldn't. I met her once as it happens. She won't have remembered my name let alone rearrange her schedule for me. As for 'bank holiday'. I'm self employed. No such thing as a bank holiday! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wasn't an official match but myself and a few other Dad's took our young children all under 12 to the park today for a match. We won 37-0 btw." Dad's v kids and the kids won? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wasn't an official match but myself and a few other Dad's took our young children all under 12 to the park today for a match. We won 37-0 btw." Maybe that's what I saw today then something like that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm pretty sure that if the queen had known a member of your family for over 70years yes. But no arguing with some people. So I assume you will be forfeiting your bank holiday and carrying on as normal on Monday the 19th? I'm very sure they wouldn't. I met her once as it happens. She won't have remembered my name let alone rearrange her schedule for me. As for 'bank holiday'. I'm self employed. No such thing as a bank holiday!" My nephew is very pleased there is a bank holiday as he will get time and a 1/2. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"demanding blind acceptance appears as bullying people into not debating what's happened. Who is bullying anyone in to anything. You are wrong to say there is a ban on football because there is not. A quick Google search will tell you otherwise. If there was a kids football game going on, they're defying the FA, so could be severely punished (relatively speaking) Or it wasn't an official cup or league game. You don't what you're talking about. Sorry, not sorry. I see you Lorna, think a lot of us do on the forums. Where's your next argument. Facebook or Twitter? I'm allowed to disagree with you without you making things personal. I'm sure lots of people do see me because I'm literally here commenting I'm not sure what your point is but let's keep it pleasant please. " You're disagreeing with facts though, not opinion. All football, including all level grassroots football has been suspended this weekend. That's a fact, but you're saying otherwise. You've literally said it hasn't because you saw kids playing football. I've no idea what you saw, but it wouldn't have been an FA regulated game, which all leagues in the country, regardless of standard, gender or age have to adhere to. You've literally argued, not just with me, but others too, about football not being 'banned.' I wouldn't use the word banned, but suspended. That is fact, but for some reason, even though you have the answer to this literally in your hand, you still feel the need to argue the opposite of what is actually true. Not sure why, but I notice you arguing (debating) a lot on here. In this case. You're wrong on this. That's factual. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What has the monarch demanded? It has been made very clear nothing is expected to stop or close it is up to individual associations, Businesses and organisations to decide what to do. Nothing to do with what the monarchy has demanded at all. it's clear that you haven't read what i wrote there. i said monarchists not monarch or monarchy for that matter. Not monarchists either is it though? because as far as I can see nobody has been demanding anything it is just what the fa has decided to do. " you need to re-read the thread in it's entirety then. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I heard on the radio this morning that all horse racing and ( something else ) were cancelled. I laughed out loud..... it's like ENFORCED mourning....... " I mean, to be fair, we can do, like, literally anything else. I could dance a jig all through the Queen's funeral if I wanted to. (Yes, I probably will work during the bank holiday. No, I don't actually plan to dance a jig. I'm just going to get on with my life) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A friend of mine was to be at an event where around twenty small, local companies get together for a world food like event. All had brought in the extra ingredients etc, the extra costs also. Then bam, cancelled as a sign of respect. I don't understand how that is a sign of respect. They could have added to the event to celebrate her life and the new king instead. To answer the question though. No, the football shouldn't have been cancelled. Football was able to go ahead this weekend. Nobody has told them they cannot have games it was up to the individual Associations and clubs to make the decision. Has it occurred to anyone that maybe the players didn't want to play? I'm aware of that. I doubt very much that they held a vote with the players on whether or not they wanted to play. Or the rest of the staff, many of which relying on the wage. Assuming here that no work may equal no pay.c Maybe rather than speculating just except this is a once in a lifetime event and the Queen was our head of state. We are one of the few countries that when our head of state dies we don't automatically close everything down. My point really is that I feel there are better ways we can show respect. My initial comment is too express why I feel shutting down is the wrong choice. Several small businesses took a big hit in the current climate. That to me is not expressing any form of respect. There have to be better ways. What better ways? I haven't heard any local businesses close to football stadiums complaining have you? What has that got to do with my initial comment? Either discuss that or stay away, don't keep putting a twist on it I'll repeat, I'm speaking of their small, local businesses I've mentioned as an example, that I know have taken a hit. In this current climate, that's a big hit. We could have celebrated her life during that event But I already suggested that and that was already ignored to switch the conversation to other things You're not going to change my mind on this, you're only reinforcing my viewpoint with you attempt to sway conversation. I haven't put a twist on anything I am asking you a question you can choose whether to answer it or not. " You're attempting to change the course of the conversation by ignoring what I have said and then asking questions that have no relation to my comments here. I mean, asking if I've considered the footballers might not want to play, have you considered that might want to do? Then asking if I've heard any traders close to football stadiums complain? Because you haven't heard them complain, doesn't mean that haven't. What a bizarre comment to make. Why bother quoting if you're going to avoid what you have quoted? Oh yeah, to change direction. (shrugs) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |