FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Unread messages

Unread messages

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

I completely understand that women are inundated with messages.

But why do some women insist on anyone who messages them following certain criteria, ie clear face pics. Original, uncut and pasted, non-generic same old story tripe.

Knowing that whoever has messaged them has actually made an effort. Only to not bother reading the messages.

Perhaps this is a reason why men do send c&p messages.

I have made a couple of good female friends from fab. They say that they can receive upwards of 800 messages a day.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple over a year ago

Leeds

The message maybe just got lost further down, if we'd received 800 messages as your friend did, there's no chance I'd have time to sit, read and reply to them all.

Mrs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"The message maybe just got lost further down, if we'd received 800 messages as your friend did, there's no chance I'd have time to sit, read and reply to them all.

Mrs "

I understand that. But why stipulate you want a certain standard of message. Then not bother to read them?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *orksRockerMan over a year ago

Bradford

Another thread from someone who thinks he's entitled

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Another thread from someone who thinks he's entitled

Perhaps. But perhaps it is like concord. Miles over your head.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

800 a day?

Ok....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"800 a day?

Ok....

I’m jealous too

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *orksRockerMan over a year ago

Bradford

"Another thread from someone who thinks he's entitled

Perhaps. But perhaps it is like concord. Miles over your head. "

There's one of these posts at least every other day.. staying exactly the same thing.

"I understand they get loads, (800 quoted above) but why don't they answer me!"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"The message maybe just got lost further down, if we'd received 800 messages as your friend did, there's no chance I'd have time to sit, read and reply to them all.

Mrs

I understand that. But why stipulate you want a certain standard of message. Then not bother to read them? "

Well you didn't read their reply

Try reading it again, it's explained clearly on why a perfect message may be missed.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"800 a day?

Ok....

I’m jealous too "

Let me guess, tits out, zero filters. The they'll complain about all the messages, it's not rocket science is it??

Trouble with this site.

Men are fucking entitled and women have egos the size of, well something huge.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Another thread from someone who thinks he's entitled

Perhaps. But perhaps it is like concord. Miles over your head.

There's one of these posts at least every other day.. staying exactly the same thing.

"I understand they get loads, (800 quoted above) but why don't they answer me!""

Sort of, but not quite.

You almost get it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Ignore your outbox, once sent your message is no longer your concern.

It's your inbox that matters.

Many people here will view the profile attached to they message before reading said message.

I've not looked, but if your profile doesn't catch their attention, it's possible they have written off the message too, before opening.

We all use this site as we please, so all I can say is to use it in a way that suits you, benefits you and leave others to do as they wish.

Some days they may not have time, or prefer to use a different aspect of the site, forum, chat room, pictures, club reviews etc and therefore might ignore messages, especially if it feels there are too many to view in that moment.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I could say I only want to meet men with dark hair. It doesn't mean I want to meet every man with dark hair. There also needs to be attraction.

As it's been said before a lot of women tend to look at profiles before deciding whether to even open a mail. If there's nothing there that appeals then no matter how much you've stuck to their rules they'll still move on and engage with someone who not only stuck to the rules but entices them too.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"The message maybe just got lost further down, if we'd received 800 messages as your friend did, there's no chance I'd have time to sit, read and reply to them all.

Mrs

I understand that. But why stipulate you want a certain standard of message. Then not bother to read them?

Well you didn't read their reply

Try reading it again, it's explained clearly on why a perfect message may be missed. "

Of course I read and understood their reply.

I’m not naive. I don’t expect a single reply from anyone. Expecting a reply would be entitled.

I’m saying that if you set out a certain set of rules that anyone that messages you has to abide by, when you receive a message that conforms with those rules. Why not bother to read the fucking message. If the message meets your criteria. What you have asked specifically for, surely you would read it?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *affeine DuskMan over a year ago

Caerphilly

How do you know it wasn't read?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Ignore your outbox, once sent your message is no longer your concern.

It's your inbox that matters.

Many people here will view the profile attached to they message before reading said message.

I've not looked, but if your profile doesn't catch their attention, it's possible they have written off the message too, before opening.

We all use this site as we please, so all I can say is to use it in a way that suits you, benefits you and leave others to do as they wish.

Now we’re getting somewhere. A discussion without the need for insults

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

OP, ask yourself, if you viewed your profile as the general user can, would you bother sending a message?

If you had many messages to look through, and viewed profiles first to gauge the level of interest, would you choose to open the message linked to a profile like your own or others with an eye catching profile?.

Jeez, take some accountability for yourself before criticising others (facepalm)

There's your answer mate, your message isn't being opened because (shrugs)

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I get many messages never counted them

I just answer the ones I want to

I keep it simple x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *eacupsbearCouple over a year ago

York

We send a few messages.

If we get an answer.. great!

If not.. fair enough..

Move on!!

No one is duty bound to answer messages.

There's some we don't answer too.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"OP, ask yourself, if you viewed your profile as the general user can, would you bother sending a message?

Jeez, take some accountability for yourself before criticising others (facepalm)

There's your answer mate, your message isn't being opened because (shrugs)"

I’m not a dimwit. But what you are saying has no relation to anything I have said.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *hrista BellendWoman over a year ago

surrounded by twinkly lights

I am In stealth atm

I receive a message

I open his profile

If I like what I see I open the message

If I don't I delete it without opening it

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"We send a few messages.

If we get an answer.. great!

If not.. fair enough..

Move on!!

No one is duty bound to answer messages.

There's some we don't answer too.

Well done. Nobody ever thought of this before.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Ask yourself a question. Did it include a face picture? If it did. She doesn’t fancy you enough to reply because there’s someone that also did, that she does.

If it didn’t include one. I suggest include one next time.

Women are complicated, but this part isn’t.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ealitybitesMan over a year ago

Belfast

You have already answered your own question.

There's a major difference between a message ticking all the available boxes and a profile ticking those same boxes.

Most people will look at the profile before opening the message and if they aren't consistent they won't read the message.

I'll flip it around and if a woman sends me a message that ticks all my boxes but I look at her profile and she has a new veri every few days then she obviously hasn't really read my profile so that conversation won't go anywhere.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"You have already answered your own question.

There's a major difference between a message ticking all the available boxes and a profile ticking those same boxes.

Most people will look at the profile before opening the message and if they aren't consistent they won't read the message.

Most people? (Citation needed)

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ealitybitesMan over a year ago

Belfast

"OP, ask yourself, if you viewed your profile as the general user can, would you bother sending a message?

Jeez, take some accountability for yourself before criticising others (facepalm)

There's your answer mate, your message isn't being opened because (shrugs)

I’m not a dimwit. But what you are saying has no relation to anything I have said. "

It has everything to do with what you said.

What would encourage anyone to read and reply to a blank profile?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *riel13Woman over a year ago

Northampton

You don't have to message those women if you don't want to... And they don't have to read/reply if they don't, either

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I completely understand that women are inundated with messages.

But why do some women insist on anyone who messages them following certain criteria, ie clear face pics. Original, uncut and pasted, non-generic same old story tripe.

Knowing that whoever has messaged them has actually made an effort. Only to not bother reading the messages.

Perhaps this is a reason why men do send c&p messages.

I have made a couple of good female friends from fab. They say that they can receive upwards of 800 messages a day.

If they are receiving so many messages they are here for the ego boost and unlikely to meet.

Why waste time messaging any 'women' who demand XYZ? They aren't going to reply. They just need the inbox count or the Fabs.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"OP, ask yourself, if you viewed your profile as the general user can, would you bother sending a message?

Jeez, take some accountability for yourself before criticising others (facepalm)

There's your answer mate, your message isn't being opened because (shrugs)

I’m not a dimwit. But what you are saying has no relation to anything I have said. "

Do you really believe that?

Allow me to recap ......

You ask why people don't open your well constructed message

I respond expressing that they're likely to look at your profile before deciding whether to open your message

I go on to express that basically that's the reason they're not opening your message.

It is completely in relation to your initial post.

How do you not see that?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

If I state I want dark haired bearded tattoo guys to message me with a face pic and to be funny, does that mean I have to reply to every guy that 'thinks' they meet that criteria?

No.

You might think you fit the criteria but for whatever reason they don't.

Also, it's your choice to jump through those hoops that they state in their profile.

As disappointing as this may be to guys, there is no way to guarantee a reply/sex.

Like I said, entitlement and egos!!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I think you’re getting far too worked up about it. Take a step back, relax. If you embrace the fact that no matter how many boxes you think you tick, or how many requirements you think you fulfill, you may still have your mail unread or deleted.

It’s Fab life. It’s a tough gig for fellas here.

Delete you’re sent messages box and forget about them.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Knowing that whoever has messaged them has actually made an effort. Only to not bother reading the messages."

They look at your profile to see the kind of effort (or lack of) there, before opening messages to see the effort in the message.

If no effort in the profile, it's unlikely the message will be viewed.

Sell yourself, nobody owes you or anybody else here.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

another guy moaning about not getting a response. It must be a day ending in y.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"OP, ask yourself, if you viewed your profile as the general user can, would you bother sending a message?

Jeez, take some accountability for yourself before criticising others (facepalm)

There's your answer mate, your message isn't being opened because (shrugs)

I’m not a dimwit. But what you are saying has no relation to anything I have said.

Do you really believe that?

Allow me to recap ......

You ask why people don't open your well constructed message

I respond expressing that they're likely to look at your profile before deciding whether to open your message

I go on to express that basically that's the reason they're not opening your message.

It is completely in relation to your initial post.

How do you not see that? "

How can you not see that you are generalising, and failing to understand what I mean.

For example:

I state on my profile don’t message me unless xyz

Someone messaged me saying xyz. What I have explicitly asked for. But then I ignore the message. So why ask for xyz?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"OP, ask yourself, if you viewed your profile as the general user can, would you bother sending a message?

Jeez, take some accountability for yourself before criticising others (facepalm)

There's your answer mate, your message isn't being opened because (shrugs)

I’m not a dimwit. But what you are saying has no relation to anything I have said.

Do you really believe that?

Allow me to recap ......

You ask why people don't open your well constructed message

I respond expressing that they're likely to look at your profile before deciding whether to open your message

I go on to express that basically that's the reason they're not opening your message.

It is completely in relation to your initial post.

How do you not see that?

How can you not see that you are generalising, and failing to understand what I mean.

For example:

I state on my profile don’t message me unless xyz

Someone messaged me saying xyz. What I have explicitly asked for. But then I ignore the message. So why ask for xyz? "

Why ask? Because they can. It really is that simple.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *he AmbassadorMan over a year ago

IRLANDA. / Prague. / Cil Dara

You remember the 80s Cadbury Caramel Bunny ad,?

Well she had great advice, just learn to take it easy my man,

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"OP, ask yourself, if you viewed your profile as the general user can, would you bother sending a message?

Jeez, take some accountability for yourself before criticising others (facepalm)

There's your answer mate, your message isn't being opened because (shrugs)

I’m not a dimwit. But what you are saying has no relation to anything I have said.

Do you really believe that?

Allow me to recap ......

You ask why people don't open your well constructed message

I respond expressing that they're likely to look at your profile before deciding whether to open your message

I go on to express that basically that's the reason they're not opening your message.

It is completely in relation to your initial post.

How do you not see that?

How can you not see that you are generalising, and failing to understand what I mean.

For example:

I state on my profile don’t message me unless xyz

Someone messaged me saying xyz. What I have explicitly asked for. But then I ignore the message. So why ask for xyz? "

Because they don't know what your message says.

Reason being, they look at your profile first and then decide to not bother looking at your message.

Your profile is the first thing they see, if no effort, they don't want to see any more.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I get it now, this is a prank, right?

Ha, you got me

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"OP, ask yourself, if you viewed your profile as the general user can, would you bother sending a message?

Jeez, take some accountability for yourself before criticising others (facepalm)

There's your answer mate, your message isn't being opened because (shrugs)

I’m not a dimwit. But what you are saying has no relation to anything I have said.

Do you really believe that?

Allow me to recap ......

You ask why people don't open your well constructed message

I respond expressing that they're likely to look at your profile before deciding whether to open your message

I go on to express that basically that's the reason they're not opening your message.

It is completely in relation to your initial post.

How do you not see that?

How can you not see that you are generalising, and failing to understand what I mean.

For example:

I state on my profile don’t message me unless xyz

Someone messaged me saying xyz. What I have explicitly asked for. But then I ignore the message. So why ask for xyz?

Why ask? Because they can. It really is that simple. "

Yes. You’re nearly there. Your statement is simplistic. Follow your reasoning though.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

No sex makes men a little angsty.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

Some of life’s great philosophers on here.

Just wave your hand and everything will be great.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"800 a day?

Ok....

I’m jealous too

Let me guess, tits out, zero filters. The they'll complain about all the messages, it's not rocket science is it??

Trouble with this site.

Men are fucking entitled and women have egos the size of, well something huge.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *bi HaiveMan over a year ago
Forum Mod

Cheeseville, Somerset

"I completely understand that women are inundated with messages.

But why do some women insist on anyone who messages them following certain criteria, ie clear face pics. Original, uncut and pasted, non-generic same old story tripe.

Knowing that whoever has messaged them has actually made an effort. Only to not bother reading the messages.

Perhaps this is a reason why men do send c&p messages.

I have made a couple of good female friends from fab. They say that they can receive upwards of 800 messages a day.

First thing we do is view the profile.

If it's pictureless, wordless and of zero interest then the greatest message in history with a myriad of artistic, creative and erotic pictures won't even get viewed.

Because nobody is interested in browsing in a shop with an empty window display. They just assume it's empty, devoid of any interesting content and likely just sat there waiting to become another charity shop.

When people realise this they'll stop whining that they're being ignored.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

It's a supply and demand issue.

There are so many men on here and women can afford to be picky.

A lot of messages I get I ignore.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Some of life’s great philosophers on here.

Just wave your hand and everything will be great. "

I shall say this only once.

They ask for xyz, you send a message with xyz. (Your choice btw)

Your version of the xyz may not be the xyz they wanted to read/see.

Also, they may not read it because they are busy/not in the mood/in a fucking mood/ talking to someone else/insert own reason here.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"OP, ask yourself, if you viewed your profile as the general user can, would you bother sending a message?

Jeez, take some accountability for yourself before criticising others (facepalm)

There's your answer mate, your message isn't being opened because (shrugs)

I’m not a dimwit. But what you are saying has no relation to anything I have said.

Do you really believe that?

Allow me to recap ......

You ask why people don't open your well constructed message

I respond expressing that they're likely to look at your profile before deciding whether to open your message

I go on to express that basically that's the reason they're not opening your message.

It is completely in relation to your initial post.

How do you not see that?

How can you not see that you are generalising, and failing to understand what I mean.

For example:

I state on my profile don’t message me unless xyz

Someone messaged me saying xyz. What I have explicitly asked for. But then I ignore the message. So why ask for xyz?

Why ask? Because they can. It really is that simple.

Yes. You’re nearly there. Your statement is simplistic. Follow your reasoning though. "

I don’t need to.

It doesn’t bother me that some people make ‘demands’.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I completely understand that women are inundated with messages.

But why do some women insist on anyone who messages them following certain criteria, ie clear face pics. Original, uncut and pasted, non-generic same old story tripe.

Knowing that whoever has messaged them has actually made an effort. Only to not bother reading the messages.

Perhaps this is a reason why men do send c&p messages.

I have made a couple of good female friends from fab. They say that they can receive upwards of 800 messages a day.

First thing we do is view the profile.

If it's pictureless, wordless and of zero interest then the greatest message in history with a myriad of artistic, creative and erotic pictures won't even get viewed.

When people realise this they'll stop whining that they're being ignored.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *he AmbassadorMan over a year ago

IRLANDA. / Prague. / Cil Dara

Maybe there is a corner of Fab that all the Fab Ninjas can go and compare Ninjalike profiles,

Someone should look into that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Some of life’s great philosophers on here.

Just wave your hand and everything will be great. "

I like this quote from the band Kiss.

I know life sometimes can get tough and I know life sometimes can be a drag

But people, we have been given a gift, we have been given a road, and that roads name is - ROCK AND ROLL.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Maybe there is a corner of Fab that all the Fab Ninjas can go and compare Ninjalike profiles,

Someone should look into that. "

But how will they know who's looking into it??

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Keyser

is on it.

My Fab cheat code allows me to see all.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Some of life’s great philosophers on here.

Just wave your hand and everything will be great.

I shall say this only once.

They ask for xyz, you send a message with xyz. (Your choice btw)

Your version of the xyz may not be the xyz they wanted to read/see.

Also, they may not read it because they are busy/not in the mood/in a fucking mood/ talking to someone else/insert own reason here.

Now you’re talking my language.

I didn’t get where I am today by saying things only once

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *he AmbassadorMan over a year ago

IRLANDA. / Prague. / Cil Dara

"Maybe there is a corner of Fab that all the Fab Ninjas can go and compare Ninjalike profiles,

Someone should look into that.

But how will they know who's looking into it??"
i have no idea, im wayyyyy under qualified to even try figure that one out, but they are fricking Ninjas, surely if anyone can figure out a stealth profile the Ninja % of Fab can,, surely.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

If she really gets 800 messages .. Thats 10 pages x 80 messages she has to read through... So I'm not surprised she doesn't read them! Who has that much time!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"If she really gets 800 messages .. Thats 10 pages x 80 messages she has to read through... So I'm not surprised she doesn't read them! Who has that much time! "

Ok maybe not in a day but she showed me her unread messages. Something like 780 odd (most of them were from me seeking entitlement)

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"If she really gets 800 messages .. Thats 10 pages x 80 messages she has to read through... So I'm not surprised she doesn't read them! Who has that much time!

Ok maybe not in a day but she showed me her unread messages. Something like 780 odd (most of them were from me seeking entitlement)

I leave my messages to stack up over a few weeks when I wanna seem popular aswell.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"If she really gets 800 messages .. Thats 10 pages x 80 messages she has to read through... So I'm not surprised she doesn't read them! Who has that much time!

Ok maybe not in a day but she showed me her unread messages. Something like 780 odd (most of them were from me seeking entitlement)

Unread is different... I have over 300..but after a few weeks they start to auto delete, 50-100 at a time over a few days

Its a bit like saying there is a needle in that haystack and you have to seaech for it because you said you definitely wanted a needle.. Might as well go choose your own needle

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"If she really gets 800 messages .. Thats 10 pages x 80 messages she has to read through... So I'm not surprised she doesn't read them! Who has that much time!

Ok maybe not in a day but she showed me her unread messages. Something like 780 odd (most of them were from me seeking entitlement)

I leave my messages to stack up over a few weeks when I wanna seem popular aswell. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *dam1971Man over a year ago

Bedford

"I leave my messages to stack up over a few weeks when I wanna seem popular aswell. "

Me too. Is it possible to stack up one message?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I leave my messages to stack up over a few weeks when I wanna seem popular aswell.

Me too. Is it possible to stack up one message?"

Wait until you get to double figures then you can a pop a "sorry guys bulk delete" status up.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Best thing to do is make your profile as attractive as you can and let them message you

There’s no point sending out messages if all it does is deflate you.

Your profile is like a shop window, make it stand out to attract those you wish to meet

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I leave my messages to stack up over a few weeks when I wanna seem popular aswell. "

I’ll put some effort in to fill your box if you like. How many would you need?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *instonandLadyAstorCouple over a year ago

Not where we seem to be...

"I completely understand that women are inundated with messages.

But why do some women insist on anyone who messages them following certain criteria, ie clear face pics. Original, uncut and pasted, non-generic same old story tripe.

Knowing that whoever has messaged them has actually made an effort. Only to not bother reading the messages.

Perhaps this is a reason why men do send c&p messages.

I have made a couple of good female friends from fab. They say that they can receive upwards of 800 messages a day.

I can only speak to our approach, I suspect many others do the same.

Message arrives in inbox.

We look at the profile.

If its a silhouette, with no profile pictures visible and not a single word in the biog, we delete it and often block the profile.

It could be the only message we receive in a month, our approach is exactly the same.

Winston

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"If she really gets 800 messages .. Thats 10 pages x 80 messages she has to read through... So I'm not surprised she doesn't read them! Who has that much time!

Ok maybe not in a day but she showed me her unread messages. Something like 780 odd (most of them were from me seeking entitlement)

I leave my messages to stack up over a few weeks when I wanna seem popular aswell.

I go back in and unread all mine now ready for the next thread that asks ‘how many unread in your box!’

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ortyairCouple over a year ago

Wallasey

We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

So if we, just using your profile as an example, received a message from you we would check your profile. With no pictures, no interests, no profile text and verifications hidden, there would be no evidence that you matched what we are looking for and we would move on and not read your message.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

I leave my messages to stack up over a few weeks when I wanna seem popular aswell.

I’ll put some effort in to fill your box if you like. How many would you need? "

I started this thread. I want my box filled first.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Ask yourself a question. Did it include a face picture? If it did. She doesn’t fancy you enough to reply because there’s someone that also did, that she does.

If it didn’t include one. I suggest include one next time.

Women are complicated, but this part isn’t. "

.. Unless it says 'don't send a face pic'.. Then definitely do not

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I leave my messages to stack up over a few weeks when I wanna seem popular aswell.

I’ll put some effort in to fill your box if you like. How many would you need? "

Its echoey at the moment, could take some filling.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

She wants XYZ but she doesn't want XYZ from you.

It's like when I'm shopping for hummus. I want hummus but I'm not keen on the sweet chilli hummus so I don't buy it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome."

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Based on your profile alone I’d be part of the club that just deletes your message without opening….

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ortyairCouple over a year ago

Wallasey

"She wants XYZ but she doesn't want XYZ from you.

It's like when I'm shopping for hummus. I want hummus but I'm not keen on the sweet chilli hummus so I don't buy it. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress. "

There are people on fab who have emotions

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ealitybitesMan over a year ago

Belfast

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress. "

So why are you sending xyz messages then?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

There are people on fab who have emotions

I’m not denying that. Don’t twist my words

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"If she really gets 800 messages .. Thats 10 pages x 80 messages she has to read through... So I'm not surprised she doesn't read them! Who has that much time!

Ok maybe not in a day but she showed me her unread messages. Something like 780 odd (most of them were from me seeking entitlement)

I leave my messages to stack up over a few weeks when I wanna seem popular aswell.

I go back in and unread all mine now ready for the next thread that asks ‘how many unread in your box!’ "

Brilliant idea!! Going to do this.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

So why are you sending xyz messages then? "

Go back through the thread if you can be bothered. Not once I said I have.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

There are people on fab who have emotions

I’m not denying that. Don’t twist my words "

I haven't twisted anything.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ealitybitesMan over a year ago

Belfast

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

So why are you sending xyz messages then?

Go back through the thread if you can be bothered. Not once I said I have.

Then why concern yourself with what others do or don't do?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

So why are you sending xyz messages then?

Go back through the thread if you can be bothered. Not once I said I have.

Then why concern yourself with what others do or don't do? "

Why have a public forum?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ortyairCouple over a year ago

Wallasey

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress. "

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

That why we ask for what we want. The attraction from someone who matches our needs leads to attraction. This then leads on to excitement before the meet, building up to a night of lust filled, passionate, wild sex.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *instonandLadyAstorCouple over a year ago

Not where we seem to be...

And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

Winston

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

800 messages a day! I'll believe if I ever saw it, a bit of fab-lore there and artistic licence maybe

It's been said before, and I myself will always check a profile and decide if the message is from a fabber I have even the most minimal seed of interest or attraction for. If not, what would be served by opening that door?

It's a very real thing here that a response of any kind gets followed up by unwanted texts until you end up having to block.

Lots will just delete unread.

Lots will use the block button as a way to filter out those they are not attracted to. Lots of guys even prefer that and have it on their profile asking you to block if not interested (which I personally think is a bit of fab-laziness on their part - if they had a genuine interest in a person they ought to remember previous look-ups or messages)

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *heSofaDestroyersCouple over a year ago

HereAndThere

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?"

We are late to the discussion but are looking for faceless blank profiles that don’t meet,

Any ideas where we can find our perv xyz….

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?"

It’s called a discussion.

I saw a local profile to me. In her bio she has a strict set of rules that you must follow if you decide to message her. She must receive 100s of messages daily. How many do you think she reads? So why bother put the rules?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

We are late to the discussion but are looking for faceless blank profiles that don’t meet,

Any ideas where we can find our perv xyz…."

Tricky! Best of luck with that

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

It’s called a discussion.

Did you ask her how many she receives?

Did you ask her how many she replies to that meet her criteria?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *heSofaDestroyersCouple over a year ago

HereAndThere

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

We are late to the discussion but are looking for faceless blank profiles that don’t meet,

Any ideas where we can find our perv xyz….

Tricky! Best of luck with that

Surely if we work together we can find someone

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

It’s called a discussion.

Well I can bet out of those “100s” not many follow the “rules”

A picture-less profile isn’t going to get far on here however good the message is you send

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

You should be exulted amongst the greatest philosophers. Descartes,Sartre et al

Winston"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

It’s called a discussion.

Hang on. You've seen a profile who has some rules, assumes that she

a) receives hundreds of messages and

b) doesn't reply to the ones which meet her criteria.

Sometimes this forum just seems full of people that just want to have a go at other people for no reason at all.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *xploring_FunWoman over a year ago

Coventry

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

It’s called a discussion.

How do you know how many she gets?

You’ve no idea what filters she’s got on.

As bonkers threads go this one is fucking hilarious. A guy, not looking to meet and not sending messaging, having a bitching session about a woman he’s never spoken with and the messages he assumes she receives and ignores…

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

We are late to the discussion but are looking for faceless blank profiles that don’t meet,

Any ideas where we can find our perv xyz….

Tricky! Best of luck with that

Surely if we work together we can find someone

Happy to help. Will keep my eyes peeled

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

It’s called a discussion.

Did you ask her how many she receives?

Did you ask her how many she replies to that meet her criteria? "

No, because I never messaged her. I thought I would throw it out for debate. Obviously I have wasted my time.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

" Yes. You’re nearly there. Your statement is simplistic. Follow your reasoning though. "

Reads to me like you have a desired response that you're waiting on to validate whatever you've already decided.

You're all worked up over an ancient fab issue that's been raised a dozen times a day.

Women have issues with guys too, it's a reality we all get on with as adults.

Why don't you just tell us what you'd like to hear so we can get back to our cuppas and enjoying our Saturday morning perv

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

It’s called a discussion.

Hang on. You've seen a profile who has some rules, assumes that she

a) receives hundreds of messages and

b) doesn't reply to the ones which meet her criteria.

Sometimes this forum just seems full of people that just want to have a go at other people for no reason at all.

Yeah this post is making me spin.. It started with a concrete 800 messages a day, that turned into 'an accumulation over an unspecified time' and is now.. Man saw womans profile - unclear whether he meets criteria, didn't have the balls to find out

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

It’s called a discussion.

Did you ask her how many she receives?

Did you ask her how many she replies to that meet her criteria?

No, because I never messaged her. I thought I would throw it out for debate. Obviously I have wasted my time. "

But you never "threw it out for debate" you had a go at women like her for not replying.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

Winston"

More on this exciting story...

Further investigation has revealed....it's just one woman.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

Winston

More on this exciting story...

Further investigation has revealed....it's just one woman.

That he didn't even contact ffs

She might have to have sex with her mattress now

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I suggest the op just has breakfast and a wank, in fact I think we should all do that.

My head hurts.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *heSofaDestroyersCouple over a year ago

HereAndThere

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

Winston

More on this exciting story...

Further investigation has revealed....it's just one woman.

"
.

We can see the headline in the Red tops tomorrow morning!

“WOMAN ON SEX SITE GETS MESSAGES “

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I suggest the op just has breakfast and a wank, in fact I think we should all do that.

My head hurts."

It's the intellectual debate

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

It’s called a discussion.

Hang on. You've seen a profile who has some rules, assumes that she

a) receives hundreds of messages and

b) doesn't reply to the ones which meet her criteria.

Sometimes this forum just seems full of people that just want to have a go at other people for no reason at all.

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Can you just tell me the answer so I can go for a wank without the question running through my head?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Some of life’s great philosophers on here.

Just wave your hand and everything will be great.

I shall say this only once.

They ask for xyz, you send a message with xyz. (Your choice btw)

Your version of the xyz may not be the xyz they wanted to read/see.

Also, they may not read it because they are busy/not in the mood/in a fucking mood/ talking to someone else/insert own reason here.

Now you’re talking my language.

I didn’t get where I am today by saying things only once "

I'm not sure 'where you are today' is a place I'd be buying a ticket to tbh.

It's meant to be fun and social too not a moan fest of ego and entitlement.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

It’s called a discussion.

Hang on. You've seen a profile who has some rules, assumes that she

a) receives hundreds of messages and

b) doesn't reply to the ones which meet her criteria.

Sometimes this forum just seems full of people that just want to have a go at other people for no reason at all.

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about. "

One woman. One. You've no evidence she doesn't reply. None at all.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"I suggest the op just has breakfast and a wank, in fact I think we should all do that.

My head hurts.

It's the intellectual debate

If I was going to wank. It would be a furious wank. Afterwards my bell end would resemble a Belisha beacon.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

Winston

More on this exciting story...

Further investigation has revealed....it's just one woman.

We can see the headline in the Red tops tomorrow morning!

“WOMAN ON SEX SITE GETS MESSAGES “"

Read all about it!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ldbutrandyMan over a year ago

West Midlands

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

Winston

More on this exciting story...

Further investigation has revealed....it's just one woman.

That he didn't even contact ffs

She might have to have sex with her mattress now

Note to self . Change username to Matt Ress

He seems to be doing quite well on here

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *xploring_FunWoman over a year ago

Coventry

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about. "

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

You have NO idea how many messages she gets. You have NO idea how many she replies to. You have NO idea how many she ignores so “This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about” should really be aimed at yourself as you’re having a pop at someone with no fucking clue about them.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *heSofaDestroyersCouple over a year ago

HereAndThere

"I suggest the op just has breakfast and a wank, in fact I think we should all do that.

My head hurts.

It's the intellectual debate

If I was going to wank. It would be a furious wank. Afterwards my bell end would resemble a Belisha beacon. "

You should and then take a photo to use that as your new profile picture!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

Winston

More on this exciting story...

Further investigation has revealed....it's just one woman.

That he didn't even contact ffs

She might have to have sex with her mattress now

Note to self . Change username to Matt Ress

He seems to be doing quite well on here

A veri might be a bit difficult

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple over a year ago

Leeds

"The message maybe just got lost further down, if we'd received 800 messages as your friend did, there's no chance I'd have time to sit, read and reply to them all.

Mrs

I understand that. But why stipulate you want a certain standard of message. Then not bother to read them? "

Do you have the spare time to read 800?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"The message maybe just got lost further down, if we'd received 800 messages as your friend did, there's no chance I'd have time to sit, read and reply to them all.

Mrs

I understand that. But why stipulate you want a certain standard of message. Then not bother to read them?

Do you have the spare time to read 800? "

He should do. I mean, he's not meeting after all - loads of spare time.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ortyairCouple over a year ago

Wallasey

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish. "

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

Should my fella just accept a cock up his arse just because a gay guy has sent us a message saying he realises he is not what we want but has his needs and my fella shouldn't be so selfish and just let him bum him?

No it's a joke right?

Surely you'd see your arse if you ordered a lamb bhuna on Just Eat but the chef didn't want to meet your needs and cooked you chips and egg. You wouldn't accept that and eat it because you didn't want to seem selfish.

You're having a laugh????

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea. "

Mate. The title of your thread is "unread messages". The only thing that's obvious is the egg on your face.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *instonandLadyAstorCouple over a year ago

Not where we seem to be...

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

You should be exulted amongst the greatest philosophers. Descartes,Sartre et al

Winston"

Your reply are more visible outside the quotation marks.

The philosophers you mention all share one thing.

Common sense. A skill "some" people lack.

Winston

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????"

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple over a year ago

Leeds

"The message maybe just got lost further down, if we'd received 800 messages as your friend did, there's no chance I'd have time to sit, read and reply to them all.

Mrs

I understand that. But why stipulate you want a certain standard of message. Then not bother to read them?

Do you have the spare time to read 800?

He should do. I mean, he's not meeting after all - loads of spare time.

very true, I mean it's as if woman don't have a life, work, commitments and we just sit and reply to all messages, I mean my thumbs ache after all them messages!

I mean Ive 2 messages but still

Mrs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *instonandLadyAstorCouple over a year ago

Not where we seem to be...

"You're not meeting yet you're started a thread telling women off for not reading messages from other men.

WTAF?

It’s called a discussion.

Hang on. You've seen a profile who has some rules, assumes that she

a) receives hundreds of messages and

b) doesn't reply to the ones which meet her criteria.

Sometimes this forum just seems full of people that just want to have a go at other people for no reason at all.

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about. "

Unfortunately you're not one of them.

Winston

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less. "

How's it selfish to want to fulfill one's needs?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"The message maybe just got lost further down, if we'd received 800 messages as your friend did, there's no chance I'd have time to sit, read and reply to them all.

Mrs

I understand that. But why stipulate you want a certain standard of message. Then not bother to read them?

Do you have the spare time to read 800?

He should do. I mean, he's not meeting after all - loads of spare time.

very true, I mean it's as if woman don't have a life, work, commitments and we just sit and reply to all messages, I mean my thumbs ache after all them messages!

I mean Ive 2 messages but still

Mrs "

I replied/ignored a dozen earlier. I'm exhausted!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea.

Mate. The title of your thread is "unread messages". The only thing that's obvious is the egg on your face. "

Do you actually think I give a flying fuck what anyone on here thinks about me.

I left school at 14. I can accept being wrong. I’m not intelligent. I asked a question. All I received back was vitriol. I don’t like bully’s. So I am going to stand my ground.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ortyairCouple over a year ago

Wallasey

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less. "

You are being pedantic. Of course everyone has needs. You need to eat, sleep, breathe.

Here on this site everyone is seeking to satisfy there sexual needs, in whatever form that takes.

So by your logic everyone is selfish? No it's just you trying to bolster your failing supposition.

You have not had one person agree with you. Maybe it's time you took a look at yourself and asked yourself' Is it me?'

But you won't because you are ultimately very selfish.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

How's it selfish to want to fulfill one's needs?

Isn’t that the definition of selfishness?

Hardly altruistic is it?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I see no one's taken my suggestion on board.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *instonandLadyAstorCouple over a year ago

Not where we seem to be...

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea.

Mate. The title of your thread is "unread messages". The only thing that's obvious is the egg on your face.

Do you actually think I give a flying fuck what anyone on here thinks about me.

I left school at 14. I can accept being wrong. I’m not intelligent. I asked a question. All I received back was vitriol. I don’t like bully’s. So I am going to stand my ground. "

I'm going to thqueem and thqueem and thqueem until I'm thick.

*stamps feet.

Winston

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Tbh if I got a message from your profile you'd get no reply, there's nothing in it, it comes across as lazy

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ortyairCouple over a year ago

Wallasey

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

How's it selfish to want to fulfill one's needs?

Isn’t that the definition of selfishness?

Hardly altruistic is it?"
Hahahaha idiot, now I should fuck guys out of a sense of alturism...this is a bad joke

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *instonandLadyAstorCouple over a year ago

Not where we seem to be...

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

How's it selfish to want to fulfill one's needs?

Isn’t that the definition of selfishness?

Hardly altruistic is it? Hahahaha idiot, now I should fuck guys out of a sense of alturism...this is a bad joke"

*writes the perfect message.....

Andddddd send.

Winston

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

You are being pedantic. Of course everyone has needs. You need to eat, sleep, breathe.

Here on this site everyone is seeking to satisfy there sexual needs, in whatever form that takes.

So by your logic everyone is selfish? No it's just you trying to bolster your failing supposition.

You have not had one person agree with you. Maybe it's time you took a look at yourself and asked yourself' Is it me?'

But you won't because you are ultimately very selfish."

Yes people are selfish by nature. We are all alone in our existence.

Basic fundamentals for life isn’t selfishnesses is it. All living things require them. But humans have consciousness. Self awareness. We can make considered choices.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *lynJMan over a year ago

Morden

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

You should be exulted amongst the greatest philosophers. Descartes,Sartre et al

Winston

Your reply are more visible outside the quotation marks.

The philosophers you mention all share one thing.

Common sense. A skill "some" people lack.

Winston

The problem with common sense is that it's not that common.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ortyairCouple over a year ago

Wallasey

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

How's it selfish to want to fulfill one's needs?

Isn’t that the definition of selfishness?

Hardly altruistic is it? Hahahaha idiot, now I should fuck guys out of a sense of alturism...this is a bad joke

*writes the perfect message.....

Andddddd send.

Winston "
Thought I was going mad for a second there, thank you x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea.

Mate. The title of your thread is "unread messages". The only thing that's obvious is the egg on your face.

Do you actually think I give a flying fuck what anyone on here thinks about me.

I left school at 14. I can accept being wrong. I’m not intelligent. I asked a question. All I received back was vitriol. I don’t like bully’s. So I am going to stand my ground. "

I don't like bullies either. I don't like it when I see someone singling out someone to have a go at all women on the site. You've had pushback and choose to call it vitriol.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *xploring_FunWoman over a year ago

Coventry

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea. "

Your motivation is obvious.

Your just another guy in a huff because your lazy profile hasn’t had you drowning in women.

In this case you’re having a snide pop at a woman that you think would ignore you if you messaged her.

Now you’re bitching because you expected other guys to be all over you in agreement.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Because anybody can have a set criteria of people they want to meet.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

How's it selfish to want to fulfill one's needs?

Isn’t that the definition of selfishness?

Hardly altruistic is it? Hahahaha idiot, now I should fuck guys out of a sense of alturism...this is a bad joke"

No need for personal abuse is there?

Where did I say you have to? If I’m an idiot you’re a moron.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

How's it selfish to want to fulfill one's needs?

Isn’t that the definition of selfishness?

Hardly altruistic is it?"

It's not a charity site. Nobody is here to be altruistic. They're here to meet their needs and fulfill fantasies. Nothing selfish about choosing to be with who you find attractive.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Someone tell me the answer!!!!!!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Someone tell me the answer!!!!!!!"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *xploring_FunWoman over a year ago

Coventry

Altruistic

That’s a belter.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *hatEscalatedQuicklyCouple over a year ago

scotland

"Someone tell me the answer!!!!!!!"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea.

Your motivation is obvious.

Your just another guy in a huff because your lazy profile hasn’t had you drowning in women.

In this case you’re having a snide pop at a woman that you think would ignore you if you messaged her.

Now you’re bitching because you expected other guys to be all over you in agreement."

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. I have had my fair share of meets from fab. I think she might ignore me. I also think the moon is made out of cream cheese.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea.

Mate. The title of your thread is "unread messages". The only thing that's obvious is the egg on your face. "

"Really bad idea" is the first glimmer of self-awareness I've seen here. Your almost there... see your thought through to the end now

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *bi HaiveMan over a year ago
Forum Mod

Cheeseville, Somerset

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

Winston"

I'm inspired.

I have a lot of work to do today but I may just start a thread asking the best way to do a DIY service on an expensive racing bicycle.

I don't own one, haven't sat on a bike since I was 8, have zero interest in cycling and quite frankly couldn't give a toss about anything on two wheels (unless it's the General Lee doing one of those really cool jumps or James Bond performing one of those tricky 'fir through a narrow gap' manoeuvres)........but I'm sure it would be a really useful and valuable way to spend time and probably of huge benefit to others.......

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *xploring_FunWoman over a year ago

Coventry

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea.

Your motivation is obvious.

Your just another guy in a huff because your lazy profile hasn’t had you drowning in women.

In this case you’re having a snide pop at a woman that you think would ignore you if you messaged her.

Now you’re bitching because you expected other guys to be all over you in agreement.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. I have had my fair share of meets from fab. I think she might ignore me. I also think the moon is made out of cream cheese. "

It’s very blatant.

You’re just another guy having a whinge because you’re not getting your own way.

You’re no different to the other umpteen guys a day that start these whinging threads.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

Winston

I'm inspired.

I have a lot of work to do today but I may just start a thread asking the best way to do a DIY service on an expensive racing bicycle.

It might just work...but you've got to spin it so it's a dig at people who cycle.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea.

Mate. The title of your thread is "unread messages". The only thing that's obvious is the egg on your face.

"Really bad idea" is the first glimmer of self-awareness I've seen here. Your almost there... see your thought through to the end now

I like you. You’re alright

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *lynJMan over a year ago

Morden

"I see no one's taken my suggestion on board. "

I must have missed it in all the noise on this thread.

Is it worth repeating?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea.

Mate. The title of your thread is "unread messages". The only thing that's obvious is the egg on your face.

"Really bad idea" is the first glimmer of self-awareness I've seen here. Your almost there... see your thought through to the end now

I like you. You’re alright

This right here^

Oh boy....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I see no one's taken my suggestion on board.

I must have missed it in all the noise on this thread.

Is it worth repeating?"

Eat breakfast and have a wank!!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *bi HaiveMan over a year ago
Forum Mod

Cheeseville, Somerset

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

Winston

I'm inspired.

I have a lot of work to do today but I may just start a thread asking the best way to do a DIY service on an expensive racing bicycle.

It might just work...but you've got to spin it so it's a dig at people who cycle.

Oh that's easy.

You just chuck in the usual 'they DoN't PAy Road TAX' , 'alWaYS jUMPIng rED lIghtS' and 'MoST oF tHEM looK ShiT iN lYCRA' lines and away you go.....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *instonandLadyAstorCouple over a year ago

Not where we seem to be...

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

Winston

I'm inspired.

I have a lot of work to do today but I may just start a thread asking the best way to do a DIY service on an expensive racing bicycle.

DO IT!!!!!!!!

Winston

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea.

Mate. The title of your thread is "unread messages". The only thing that's obvious is the egg on your face.

"Really bad idea" is the first glimmer of self-awareness I've seen here. Your almost there... see your thought through to the end now

I like you. You’re alright

Delete

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

In what way am I “having a go”. I’m asking why would someone make rules they don’t fucking follow themselves?

This forum seems full of people who think they know what they are talking about.

How do you know she doesn’t if you’ve never messaged her?

Isn’t all that obvious. That’s why I decided to ask the forum.

Really bad idea.

Mate. The title of your thread is "unread messages". The only thing that's obvious is the egg on your face.

"Really bad idea" is the first glimmer of self-awareness I've seen here. Your almost there... see your thought through to the end now

I like you. You’re alright

This right here^

Oh boy...."

Maybe I will send you a message. But you probably wouldn’t read it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"And in todays odd news, man starts message moaning about women not reading the perfectly written message, then confesses that he doesn't send messages and isn't looking to meet. '\_

_/'

More at 10

Winston

I'm inspired.

I have a lot of work to do today but I may just start a thread asking the best way to do a DIY service on an expensive racing bicycle.

It might just work...but you've got to spin it so it's a dig at people who cycle.

Oh that's easy.

You just chuck in the usual 'they DoN't PAy Road TAX' , 'alWaYS jUMPIng rED lIghtS' and 'MoST oF tHEM looK ShiT iN lYCRA' lines and away you go.....

...don't forget "think they own the road"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *_Mr.K_xMan over a year ago

North Worcestershire

Ironically, a forum thread titled "Unread Messages" is read and responded to by many....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ortyairCouple over a year ago

Wallasey

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

You are being pedantic. Of course everyone has needs. You need to eat, sleep, breathe.

Here on this site everyone is seeking to satisfy there sexual needs, in whatever form that takes.

So by your logic everyone is selfish? No it's just you trying to bolster your failing supposition.

You have not had one person agree with you. Maybe it's time you took a look at yourself and asked yourself' Is it me?'

But you won't because you are ultimately very selfish.

Yes people are selfish by nature. We are all alone in our existence.

Basic fundamentals for life isn’t selfishnesses is it. All living things require them. But humans have consciousness. Self awareness. We can make considered choices. "

Sometimes you need to know you have hit rock bottom, in fortunately you are now starting to dig...

You are absolutely right when you say that 'Basic fundamentals for life isn't selfishness'. But you absolutely, definitely, positively cannot have life as a human, in the natural cause of events, without your parents having sex. It is the only thing we were put on the Earth to do. Everything else, eating, drinking, breathing is just necessary to get us to the point of passing on our genetic material to continue the survival of the species.

So as for your statement are you now agreeing that the sexual need within us all is not selfish? Indeed it is NEEDED for the survival of mankind.

Also you say we have 'considered choices'. So do you agree that I am free to make these choices to satisfy my hunger and thirst by choosing to sate them with what I want rather than being told by you what I should eat and drink, otherwise I am selfish? Furthermore am I able to fuck whoever I want by exercising my right to 'considered choice, as you yourself said?

Come on you cannot have it both ways....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I didn't reply to a message yesterday. Because it was boring AF and two words long. He sent me a passive aggressive message two hours later shaming me for not replying. I think he was hoping for an altruistic fuck.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *_Mr.K_xMan over a year ago

North Worcestershire

Thread getting close to the magic 175 mark where it'll become too long and no-one able to reply...

Best start up another thread soon then

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Thread getting close to the magic 175 mark where it'll become too long and no-one able to reply...

Best start up another thread soon then

You can reply if you know how

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

You are being pedantic. Of course everyone has needs. You need to eat, sleep, breathe.

Here on this site everyone is seeking to satisfy there sexual needs, in whatever form that takes.

So by your logic everyone is selfish? No it's just you trying to bolster your failing supposition.

You have not had one person agree with you. Maybe it's time you took a look at yourself and asked yourself' Is it me?'

But you won't because you are ultimately very selfish.

Yes people are selfish by nature. We are all alone in our existence.

Basic fundamentals for life isn’t selfishnesses is it. All living things require them. But humans have consciousness. Self awareness. We can make considered choices.

Sometimes you need to know you have hit rock bottom, in fortunately you are now starting to dig...

So as for your statement are you now agreeing that the sexual need within us all is not selfish? Indeed it is NEEDED for the survival of mankind.

Come on you cannot have it both ways...."

So you only have sex for the purpose of procreation?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ortyairCouple over a year ago

Wallasey

Bored of it right now, think he just likes to argue...poorly lol x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Thread getting close to the magic 175 mark where it'll become too long and no-one able to reply...

Best start up another thread soon then

You can reply if you know how

Don't give away the secret!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *_Mr.K_xMan over a year ago

North Worcestershire

"Thread getting close to the magic 175 mark where it'll become too long and no-one able to reply...

Best start up another thread soon then

You can reply if you know how

Oh... do tell! Intrigued

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ortyairCouple over a year ago

Wallasey

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

You are being pedantic. Of course everyone has needs. You need to eat, sleep, breathe.

Here on this site everyone is seeking to satisfy there sexual needs, in whatever form that takes.

So by your logic everyone is selfish? No it's just you trying to bolster your failing supposition.

You have not had one person agree with you. Maybe it's time you took a look at yourself and asked yourself' Is it me?'

But you won't because you are ultimately very selfish.

Yes people are selfish by nature. We are all alone in our existence.

Basic fundamentals for life isn’t selfishnesses is it. All living things require them. But humans have consciousness. Self awareness. We can make considered choices.

Sometimes you need to know you have hit rock bottom, in fortunately you are now starting to dig...

So as for your statement are you now agreeing that the sexual need within us all is not selfish? Indeed it is NEEDED for the survival of mankind.

Come on you cannot have it both ways....

So you only have sex for the purpose of procreation? "
I sincerely hope you never... As a race we'd be fucked, no pun intended c

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *bi HaiveMan over a year ago
Forum Mod

Cheeseville, Somerset

"Thread getting close to the magic 175 mark where it'll become too long and no-one able to reply...

Best start up another thread soon then

A sequel?

Part two?

Will it be a great 'Godfather Part II' epic or an absolute bag of shite 'Basic Instinct 2'......

I wait with baited breath.......

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 03/09/22 09:22:15]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Thread getting close to the magic 175 mark where it'll become too long and no-one able to reply...

Best start up another thread soon then

You can reply if you know how

Oh... do tell! Intrigued"

Oh I don't know how.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Bored of it right now, think he just likes to argue...poorly lol x"

Oh come on now. What else would you be doing? Sending unread messages. Furiously wanking? Having needy sex with random fabbers?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *annaBeStrongMan over a year ago

wokingham

Don’t hate the player, hate the game. If crafting good messages isn’t worth your time, don’t do it

Nothing will change how often women reply or even open messages

Your aiming at the wrong person. Stop trying to change what others do, instead change what you do. If you wanna copy and paste, do it. Or stop messaging all together if it’s not worth your time

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *instonandLadyAstorCouple over a year ago

Not where we seem to be...

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

How's it selfish to want to fulfill one's needs?

Isn’t that the definition of selfishness?

Hardly altruistic is it? Hahahaha idiot, now I should fuck guys out of a sense of alturism...this is a bad joke

No need for personal abuse is there?

Where did I say you have to? If I’m an idiot you’re a moron. "

Ironic newsflash......

Man says there's no need for personal abuse and goes on to personally abuse someone.

Stay tuned.

More at 10.

Winston

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ilf and old fartCouple over a year ago

Between Ely and Mildenhall

[Removed by poster at 03/09/22 09:23:32]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

There's so much wrong here I just can't decide where to start.

You posted a thread, got responses that didn't match your predicted hypothesis of where it would go so got worked up, people sent the strong opinions you came looking for but not the ones you wanted & the reality was a little less comfortable than you expected so you became sanctimonious and 'dug in' to your unsubstatiated argument even further, then you tried to deflect with a bit of a weak flirt, then told someone off for a mild namecall by calling them a moron, then you tried to be the nice guy and round we go.

This is pointless drivel, you'll now likely be blocked by everyone who has read this nonsense.

Productive morning all round.

You need more than good luck wishes here now OP but we all still don't wish you bad things, just that you don't waste our time perhaps.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"We have a criteria on our profile for the kind of meets we would like.

Part of that criteria is that we are looking for younger guys, who are fit and vvwe.

Now this is subjective and what we consider to meet these attributes will not necessarily be the same as those who send us messages.

How younger, how fit and how hung is a matter for us and so we would always look at the profile first to ascertain that a person's attributes matches our needs.

Put the same effort into your profile as you are saying you put in your messages and you may get a better outcome.

My profile is blank for a reason. I’m not looking to meet anyone from fab. I have finally come to realise that sex without emotion is pointless. I might as well have sex with the mattress.

Well at least we agree on one thing, sex without emotion is pointless.

Sounds selfish. Your needs. That person has their needs.

To use someone that matches your needs.

I have been on fab for a good few years now. And believe it or not I have had my fair share of meets. I found it is mostly selfish.

So let me get this straight. I should not play with someone who I choose to play with because they are exactly what I am looking for and fulfill my needs.

What your suggesting is that I should fuck whoever message me, regardless of whether they match what I am looking for, otherwise I am selfish??

This is either a wind up or you have not got the concept of what the site is about.

No it's a joke right?

You're having a laugh????

You’re conflating what I said to suit your agenda. When you said you were looking to fulfill your needs that is the selfish part. No more no less.

You are being pedantic. Of course everyone has needs. You need to eat, sleep, breathe.

Here on this site everyone is seeking to satisfy there sexual needs, in whatever form that takes.

So by your logic everyone is selfish? No it's just you trying to bolster your failing supposition.

You have not had one person agree with you. Maybe it's time you took a look at yourself and asked yourself' Is it me?'

But you won't because you are ultimately very selfish.

Yes people are selfish by nature. We are all alone in our existence.

Basic fundamentals for life isn’t selfishnesses is it. All living things require them. But humans have consciousness. Self awareness. We can make considered choices.

Sometimes you need to know you have hit rock bottom, in fortunately you are now starting to dig...

So as for your statement are you now agreeing that the sexual need within us all is not selfish? Indeed it is NEEDED for the survival of mankind.

Come on you cannot have it both ways....

So you only have sex for the purpose of procreation? I sincerely hope you never... As a race we'd be fucked, no pun intended c"

Come on, is that the best you’ve got?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *instonandLadyAstorCouple over a year ago

Not where we seem to be...

"Thread getting close to the magic 175 mark where it'll become too long and no-one able to reply...

Best start up another thread soon then

A sequel?

Part two?

Will it be a great 'Godfather Part II' epic or an absolute bag of shite 'Basic Instinct 2'......

I wait with baited breath.......

I'm still waiting for the "best way to do a DIY service on an expensive racing bicycle" thread.

Winston

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

People like to have the last word.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *bi HaiveMan over a year ago
Forum Mod

Cheeseville, Somerset

"Thread getting close to the magic 175 mark where it'll become too long and no-one able to reply...

Best start up another thread soon then

You can reply if you know how

Oh... do tell! Intrigued

Oh I don't know how. "

Are we there yet?

I need a wee.

This definitely isn't the direction I thought we'd be going in.

For fucks sake, we're going round in circles here.

*just a few comments relevant to this thread that can also be handy to use when driving long journeys with small children without sat nav....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

There now.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

It's an interesting discussion OP. Eye opening for sure.

Hope it doesn't put you off the human race. You seem like a decent bloke and it was just a question you raised for discussion.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)