FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Men vs women
Men vs women
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
| |||
 compared to
Men.
We’re just not shallow I guess….
 | |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
"Of course men fuck women hotter then them, they tend to have the finances to support it though. " Ouch... | |||
| |||
| |||
"Depends on your definition of hot men! I think you have a point on some level, it’s very very rare I look at a couple and think ‘she’s punching’. Unless people think that about my husband "Can’t remember your husband but I know I certainly would be | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"I think in general there’s a big difference between who men will *fuck* vs who men want to *date*, it’s partly why ladies on Fab can afford to be very selective on here as the pool of available supply of men to fuck is so great, so that they can always get one ther find “attractive” Whereas a lot of men on here say they won’t meet anyone they don’t find attractive (me included) that’s naturally going to limit the chances of getting your dick wet, based on available supply. In the dating game, as opposed to the casual sex game, the odds are much more evenly balanced. Women don’t hold the upper hand in the same way so there’s more “natural selection” on the whole and people, on average, tend to end up with attractive equivalents (all other things, eg wealth, being equal) " Is this basically that women are the gatekeepers of sex, men are yur gatekeepers of relationships? | |||
 | |||
| |||
"Although I really want to argue with this. Dating apps have released figures that say men ‘swipe to like’ at least twice as much as women. Woman’s stats are really really low on who they find attractive. compared to
Men.
We’re just not shallow I guess….
"Does having preferences make a woman shallow? Or does it make them strong because they are capable of saying no? | |||
"Although I really want to argue with this. Dating apps have released figures that say men ‘swipe to like’ at least twice as much as women. Woman’s stats are really really low on who they find attractive. compared to
Men.
We’re just not shallow I guess….
Does having preferences make a woman shallow? Or does it make them strong because they are capable of saying no? "How does she say no with a ball gag? 
Forget safe words, ‘blink three times for stop!’
*it’s a joke.!! 
| |||
"Because sex for women, biologically, is very risky. Imagine letting some moron fuck you 20,000 years ago and suddenly your pregnant and he’s bolted. You’re as good as dead without society to protect and provide for you like it does today " And if he was an ugly cnut you're stuck with an ugly wean. | |||
"Of course men fuck women hotter then them, they tend to have the finances to support it though. " How very cynical of you. | |||
"It's funny that women won't fuck some one they don't find attractive.. But even hot men will fuck women they don't find attractive or would even want to be seen in public with ...!! So do women ever fuck down ? Do men ever fuck women hotter then them ? " Have you surveyed this to back up your argument? 
Are you talking about real life or just Fab?
Because I'm pretty sure that's not really true.
Do I consider myself batting out of my league? Every waking moment.
But attraction is personal. I've seen stupidly hot (in stereotypical terms) women with men I'd personally class as average looking (again nothing harsh, just a personal opinion) and not just because they were loaded, but because they were funny as fuck, genuinely good people and the kind of person you'd want to spend time with.
Likewise 'genetically blessed' looks wise guys with women that many would percieve as less stereotypically attractive.
And that's in real life, in swingers clubs and in couples on here.
I'm not suggesting my 'survey' is better than, or more reliable than yours of course. But there's definitely no bias, agenda or motivation behind mine.
So I'm definitely curious what's caused you to feel this way OP.
Please share.
A | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
 dude dont speak for me i turn the hottys down too  | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"It's funny that women won't fuck some one they don't find attractive.. But even hot men will fuck women they don't find attractive or would even want to be seen in public with ...!! So do women ever fuck down ? Do men ever fuck women hotter then them ? I have learnt the hard way that hugely attractive lookingwomen are so far up their own arse to be unpleasant to be around. So to be honest I woukd avoid them like bubonic plague. If a woman has a nice personality and treats me like a human being then I find their company more fulfilling even in the swinging world looks are nit everything. " | |||
| |||
| |||
"It's funny that women won't fuck some one they don't find attractive.. But even hot men will fuck women they don't find attractive or would even want to be seen in public with ...!! So do women ever fuck down ? Do men ever fuck women hotter then them ? " It's even funnier that anyone could think this is true... | |||
"Men are attracted to purely what they see. Women=boobs=attracted!! Women are more attracted to what they see and hear. Hot guy opens mouth = woman gets the vibrator out. " Hot woman opens her mouth…. I get my cock out | |||
"Of course men fuck women hotter then them, they tend to have the finances to support it though. How very cynical of you. "I'm not quite being serious. In the slightest. | |||
"Of course men fuck women hotter then them, they tend to have the finances to support it though. How very cynical of you.
I'm not quite being serious. In the slightest."I believe you! | |||
"Men are attracted to purely what they see. Women=boobs=attracted!! Women are more attracted to what they see and hear. Hot guy opens mouth = woman gets the vibrator out. Hot woman opens her mouth…. I get my cock out" Teeth | |||
"Men are attracted to purely what they see. Women=boobs=attracted!! Women are more attracted to what they see and hear. Hot guy opens mouth = woman gets the vibrator out. Hot woman opens her mouth…. I get my cock out Teeth" You take your teeth out? I never knew!? | |||
"Men are attracted to purely what they see. Women=boobs=attracted!! Women are more attracted to what they see and hear. Hot guy opens mouth = woman gets the vibrator out. Hot woman opens her mouth…. I get my cock out Teeth You take your teeth out? I never knew!? " This is why men like older women!! | |||
"Men are attracted to purely what they see. Women=boobs=attracted!! Women are more attracted to what they see and hear. Hot guy opens mouth = woman gets the vibrator out. Hot woman opens her mouth…. I get my cock out Teeth You take your teeth out? I never knew!? This is why men like older women!!" Hmmmmm….interesting! | |||
"Men are attracted to purely what they see. Women=boobs=attracted!! Women are more attracted to what they see and hear. Hot guy opens mouth = woman gets the vibrator out. Hot woman opens her mouth…. I get my cock out Teeth You take your teeth out? I never knew!? This is why men like older women!!" This is why I don’t put my drink of water down near pensioners….
| |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
| |||
. I won't even chat if I'm not attracted to them. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"It's funny that women won't fuck some one they don't find attractive.. But even hot men will fuck women they don't find attractive or would even want to be seen in public with ...!! So do women ever fuck down ? Do men ever fuck women hotter then them ? " Maybe you but not me Marc | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow " Good looking people CAN be shallow. Men and women. This is a shallow site. | |||
"It's funny that women won't fuck some one they don't find attractive.. But even hot men will fuck women they don't find attractive or would even want to be seen in public with ...!! So do women ever fuck down ? Do men ever fuck women hotter then them ? " Are your definitions of "hot" and "attractive" only based on looks? Because some of us like others and want to sleep with them based on more than that. | |||
| |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow " This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. | |||
"Of course men fuck women hotter then them, they tend to have the finances to support it though. " | |||
| |||
| |||
"It's funny that women won't fuck some one they don't find attractive.. But even hot men will fuck women they don't find attractive or would even want to be seen in public with ...!! So do women ever fuck down ? Do men ever fuck women hotter then them ? " Fucking down is great. They are really desperate to get their dick wet so they put a lot of effort in and make it worthwhile. | |||
"My ex was one of those that would find almost anything to make someone "fuckable" I don't find her pretty but she's got nice ankles that make her fuckable Her body isn't for me, but she's got pretty eyes that make her fuckable She's got a shitty personality and she ain't no looker, but her confidence makes her fuckable I'm not into men, I don't find them attractive in the slightest, but if it turns you on I'll fuck him. " Thats a great way of working it. | |||
"My ex was one of those that would find almost anything to make someone "fuckable" I don't find her pretty but she's got nice ankles that make her fuckable Her body isn't for me, but she's got pretty eyes that make her fuckable She's got a shitty personality and she ain't no looker, but her confidence makes her fuckable I'm not into men, I don't find them attractive in the slightest, but if it turns you on I'll fuck him. " See, we man need to have some attraction to fuck  | |||
| |||
"Bernie ecclestone...case closed "I was about to mention him | |||
"My ex was one of those that would find almost anything to make someone "fuckable" I don't find her pretty but she's got nice ankles that make her fuckable Her body isn't for me, but she's got pretty eyes that make her fuckable She's got a shitty personality and she ain't no looker, but her confidence makes her fuckable I'm not into men, I don't find them attractive in the slightest, but if it turns you on I'll fuck him. See, we man need to have some attraction to fuck "See. We have depth… | |||
| |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. " Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person | |||
| |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person " What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? | |||
"I just came here to watch men and women generalise and tell each other what the opposite sex thinks and wants. You know, because everyone is a veteran psychologist with decades of research experience and not at all generalising a whole gender group based on anecdotal experiences. " Well said fella | |||
| |||
"We get messages off super hot men and I mostly just ignore then, I know for a fact they wouldn't be seen dead with me in public, it makes me feel really self conscious so I couldn't have sex with them. I have to feel mutual attraction first, Mr P on the other hand is less picky "I do this too, very aware of my 'visual limitations' | |||
| |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes?" They fall in the middle | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle " But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? " Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways " Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? " It applies to them too | |||
| |||
"Speak for yourself. I won’t have sex with someone I’m not attracted to. " | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too " So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. | |||
| |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways " Yeah, I do see your point and I can only point to individuals that don't conform to that rule. However I am stunningly beautiful and have the personality of a saint | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. " Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn" Love a good news bulletin. Please continue | |||
| |||
"It's funny that women won't fuck some one they don't find attractive.. But even hot men will fuck women they don't find attractive or would even want to be seen in public with ...!! So do women ever fuck down ? Do men ever fuck women hotter then them ? " I've never slept with anyone worse looking than me... mainly because I'm a bloke who doesn't fancy men. Personally there has to be an attractive mind more than anything. You make love to the whole of the woman body, mind, and soul. | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn" I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. " It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. | |||
| |||
| |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. " I know there's research to support positive biases towards the conventionally attractive. Across a number of areas. I haven't seen research to support your suggestion that this means pretty people are then more likely to have negative character traits. And here most people don't show their faces (including you and I) so how can we know their true attractiveness? | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. I know there's research to support positive biases towards the conventionally attractive. Across a number of areas. I haven't seen research to support your suggestion that this means pretty people are then more likely to have negative character traits. And here most people don't show their faces (including you and I) so how can we know their true attractiveness? " The less 'personality' they have the more attractive they'll be it would seem | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Yeah, I do see your point and I can only point to individuals that don't conform to that rule. However I am stunningly beautiful and have the personality of a saint "And here I am looking like the back end of a bus yet with a personality more abrasive than coarse grade sandpaper. | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. I know there's research to support positive biases towards the conventionally attractive. Across a number of areas. I haven't seen research to support your suggestion that this means pretty people are then more likely to have negative character traits. And here most people don't show their faces (including you and I) so how can we know their true attractiveness? The less 'personality' they have the more attractive they'll be it would seem" To some. I guess. Can't think of anything less attractive than a good looking man with nowt in his head. | |||
"It's funny that women won't fuck some one they don't find attractive.. But even hot men will fuck women they don't find attractive or would even want to be seen in public with ...!! So do women ever fuck down ? Do men ever fuck women hotter then them ? " Speaking from my own experience Stella Artois has a lot to answer for | |||
"It's funny that women won't fuck some one they don't find attractive.. But even hot men will fuck women they don't find attractive or would even want to be seen in public with ...!! So do women ever fuck down ? Do men ever fuck women hotter then them ? " Sadly, men like that spoil sites like this for the rest of us. I’ll continue to be choosy and selective, if that’s ok? | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. I know there's research to support positive biases towards the conventionally attractive. Across a number of areas. I haven't seen research to support your suggestion that this means pretty people are then more likely to have negative character traits. And here most people don't show their faces (including you and I) so how can we know their true attractiveness? " There probably aren’t studies because it’s a hard thing to quantify But it’s common sense to me. If having pretty privilege let’s you get away with more, what pressure is there to change You let a kid be bad without consequences and he’s more likely to keep being bad You’re a stunning woman with unlimited options, what’s making you be a good person? That’s not to say they will always be a bad person, but it’s nature vs nurture, there’s usually a driving force behind change. A good example is a guy on here with no bio and a dick pic. The driving force to make him make a better profile is that fact that his current profile is getting no success. If he was getting 500 messages a day though, why would he change? He might of his own decision, but there’s no driving force behind him | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. I know there's research to support positive biases towards the conventionally attractive. Across a number of areas. I haven't seen research to support your suggestion that this means pretty people are then more likely to have negative character traits. And here most people don't show their faces (including you and I) so how can we know their true attractiveness? There probably aren’t studies because it’s a hard thing to quantify But it’s common sense to me. If having pretty privilege let’s you get away with more, what pressure is there to change You let a kid be bad without consequences and he’s more likely to keep being bad You’re a stunning woman with unlimited options, what’s making you be a good person? That’s not to say they will always be a bad person, but it’s nature vs nurture, there’s usually a driving force behind change. A good example is a guy on here with no bio and a dick pic. The driving force to make him make a better profile is that fact that his current profile is getting no success. If he was getting 500 messages a day though, why would he change? He might of his own decision, but there’s no driving force behind him" Your "common sense" is based on your world view. Which is inherently cynical, I think? I don't know you, I'm basing that on what I've seen you post. My worldview is inherently not cynical (exceptions obviously) so my common sense doesn't assume that "pretty people" don't have a motivation to be nice as well. My motivation to be a nicer person isn't based on other people thinking better of me. | |||
| |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. I know there's research to support positive biases towards the conventionally attractive. Across a number of areas. I haven't seen research to support your suggestion that this means pretty people are then more likely to have negative character traits. And here most people don't show their faces (including you and I) so how can we know their true attractiveness? There probably aren’t studies because it’s a hard thing to quantify But it’s common sense to me. If having pretty privilege let’s you get away with more, what pressure is there to change You let a kid be bad without consequences and he’s more likely to keep being bad You’re a stunning woman with unlimited options, what’s making you be a good person? That’s not to say they will always be a bad person, but it’s nature vs nurture, there’s usually a driving force behind change. A good example is a guy on here with no bio and a dick pic. The driving force to make him make a better profile is that fact that his current profile is getting no success. If he was getting 500 messages a day though, why would he change? He might of his own decision, but there’s no driving force behind him" Most kids aren't bad because they get away with it, they behave badly because they're either, unstable, struggling, haven't learnt how to process emotions or simply learning boundaries. | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. I know there's research to support positive biases towards the conventionally attractive. Across a number of areas. I haven't seen research to support your suggestion that this means pretty people are then more likely to have negative character traits. And here most people don't show their faces (including you and I) so how can we know their true attractiveness? There probably aren’t studies because it’s a hard thing to quantify But it’s common sense to me. If having pretty privilege let’s you get away with more, what pressure is there to change You let a kid be bad without consequences and he’s more likely to keep being bad You’re a stunning woman with unlimited options, what’s making you be a good person? That’s not to say they will always be a bad person, but it’s nature vs nurture, there’s usually a driving force behind change. A good example is a guy on here with no bio and a dick pic. The driving force to make him make a better profile is that fact that his current profile is getting no success. If he was getting 500 messages a day though, why would he change? He might of his own decision, but there’s no driving force behind him Your "common sense" is based on your world view. Which is inherently cynical, I think? I don't know you, I'm basing that on what I've seen you post. My worldview is inherently not cynical (exceptions obviously) so my common sense doesn't assume that "pretty people" don't have a motivation to be nice as well. My motivation to be a nicer person isn't based on other people thinking better of me. " That’s fair, we just disagree then. I think if you have less push back against a bad behaviour your lure likely to have that behaviour. That’s just common sense to me, and I don’t think it’s cynical, it’s just realistic. But it’s just opinion based on what I’ve seen and experienced, so it’s no less right or wrong than anyone else’s opinion | |||
| |||
"Men fuck with thier dicks, women fuck with thier minds. Hence the book men are from Mars and women are from Venus "This I can get behind! Sex to men is like food. Sure we’d all like steak sometimes, but when I’m really hungry a fish finger sandwich can really hit the spot | |||
"Men fuck with thier dicks, women fuck with thier minds. Hence the book men are from Mars and women are from Venus "Not true. I like to fuck with other peoples minds more than my dick. | |||
| |||
"Men fuck with thier dicks, women fuck with thier minds. Hence the book men are from Mars and women are from Venus "I mind fuck lots of guys so yeah I'll go with this. | |||
"Men fuck with thier dicks, women fuck with thier minds. Hence the book men are from Mars and women are from Venus "im not having that if she cant get into my head theres not a chance il get into her pants id rather be excited to see someone than fuck a cardboard cutout | |||
| |||
"Men fuck with thier dicks, women fuck with thier minds. Hence the book men are from Mars and women are from Venus
This I can get behind!
Sex to men is like food. Sure we’d all like steak sometimes, but when I’m really hungry a fish finger sandwich can really hit the spot "What woman doesn't want to be a fish finger sandwich to a man? | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. I know there's research to support positive biases towards the conventionally attractive. Across a number of areas. I haven't seen research to support your suggestion that this means pretty people are then more likely to have negative character traits. And here most people don't show their faces (including you and I) so how can we know their true attractiveness? There probably aren’t studies because it’s a hard thing to quantify But it’s common sense to me. If having pretty privilege let’s you get away with more, what pressure is there to change You let a kid be bad without consequences and he’s more likely to keep being bad You’re a stunning woman with unlimited options, what’s making you be a good person? That’s not to say they will always be a bad person, but it’s nature vs nurture, there’s usually a driving force behind change. A good example is a guy on here with no bio and a dick pic. The driving force to make him make a better profile is that fact that his current profile is getting no success. If he was getting 500 messages a day though, why would he change? He might of his own decision, but there’s no driving force behind him Most kids aren't bad because they get away with it, they behave badly because they're either, unstable, struggling, haven't learnt how to process emotions or simply learning boundaries." You would need to define "bad". Otherwise it's quite the opposite. | |||
| |||
"I think for a woman to allow another person to enter her body she will tend to be more selective than a man who wants to get his dick wet and run " Have you seen the body count on some of the female profiles on here? | |||
"It's funny that women won't fuck some one they don't find attractive.. But even hot men will fuck women they don't find attractive or would even want to be seen in public with ...!! So do women ever fuck down ? Do men ever fuck women hotter then them ? " I won’t fuck anyone, male or female, that I’m not attracted to in some way, and it’s not all down to looks - for me it is just about having a connection with someone…which seems to be an alien concept to many haha. But at the end of the day, each to their own, as long as people are having fun, who are we to judge
F (Mrs) | |||
| |||
"#notallmen" #notallanygroupever The hypocritical acceptance of some "isms" is astounding | |||
"Depends on your definition of hot men! I think you have a point on some level, it’s very very rare I look at a couple and think ‘she’s punching’. Unless people think that about my husband "I think you're gorgeous! No Kym Marsh but still pretty sexy  | |||
"I think for a woman to allow another person to enter her body she will tend to be more selective than a man who wants to get his dick wet and run Have you seen the body count on some of the female profiles on here? " Hahahaha - I’m posting this on the wrong site | |||
"Men fuck with thier dicks, women fuck with thier minds. Hence the book men are from Mars and women are from Venus "Where did you learn this pish? | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. I know there's research to support positive biases towards the conventionally attractive. Across a number of areas. I haven't seen research to support your suggestion that this means pretty people are then more likely to have negative character traits. And here most people don't show their faces (including you and I) so how can we know their true attractiveness? There probably aren’t studies because it’s a hard thing to quantify But it’s common sense to me. If having pretty privilege let’s you get away with more, what pressure is there to change You let a kid be bad without consequences and he’s more likely to keep being bad You’re a stunning woman with unlimited options, what’s making you be a good person? That’s not to say they will always be a bad person, but it’s nature vs nurture, there’s usually a driving force behind change. A good example is a guy on here with no bio and a dick pic. The driving force to make him make a better profile is that fact that his current profile is getting no success. If he was getting 500 messages a day though, why would he change? He might of his own decision, but there’s no driving force behind him Your "common sense" is based on your world view. Which is inherently cynical, I think? I don't know you, I'm basing that on what I've seen you post. My worldview is inherently not cynical (exceptions obviously) so my common sense doesn't assume that "pretty people" don't have a motivation to be nice as well. My motivation to be a nicer person isn't based on other people thinking better of me. That’s fair, we just disagree then. I think if you have less push back against a bad behaviour your lure likely to have that behaviour. That’s just common sense to me, and I don’t think it’s cynical, it’s just realistic. But it’s just opinion based on what I’ve seen and experienced, so it’s no less right or wrong than anyone else’s opinion " I mean this keeps coming up in these intrinsically men v women debates... It's all very well saying I haven't seen or am not aware of... as if that is the arbitrators benchmark. It is infact just willful ignorance... in sofar as your avoid becoming informed about something so as to avoid having to make undesirable admissions that such information might prompt... I mean... its the forum of what is essentially a grumble site, or... nonetheless a double blind study and empiric evidence is the shout... lol. Would they bother there ass to read it... I think not... As its litterally right there if you Google it. But no... state you haven't seen (or searched) as that assists in validating a point at a cursory glance... But... accepted measured research dating back to about 1927 from what i understand (maybe later) by various physiological institutions around the world establishing a base line for attractiveness exists (shock horror). These also assess the various character traits of the individual...(shock horror 2) Summary, being attractive people do indeed appear to have in general more negative character traits and a less 'agreeable' nature. (Shock horror 3). We have known about this for a long time... even the Romans assessed it in a fashion... (shock horror IV) You should be aware pople seem to assume that positive interpersonal qualities and physical attractiveness are systematically linked... i.e., a “halo effect”... heard of it...? No...? See andreoni & Petrie, 2008; Callan, Powell, & Ellard, 2007; Smith, McIntosh, & Bazzini, 1999 Its essentially the reason why two men of differing aesthetics (undesirable and desirable) both asking a girl the same question can be percieved incredibly differently as an example... | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. I know there's research to support positive biases towards the conventionally attractive. Across a number of areas. I haven't seen research to support your suggestion that this means pretty people are then more likely to have negative character traits. And here most people don't show their faces (including you and I) so how can we know their true attractiveness? There probably aren’t studies because it’s a hard thing to quantify But it’s common sense to me. If having pretty privilege let’s you get away with more, what pressure is there to change You let a kid be bad without consequences and he’s more likely to keep being bad You’re a stunning woman with unlimited options, what’s making you be a good person? That’s not to say they will always be a bad person, but it’s nature vs nurture, there’s usually a driving force behind change. A good example is a guy on here with no bio and a dick pic. The driving force to make him make a better profile is that fact that his current profile is getting no success. If he was getting 500 messages a day though, why would he change? He might of his own decision, but there’s no driving force behind him Your "common sense" is based on your world view. Which is inherently cynical, I think? I don't know you, I'm basing that on what I've seen you post. My worldview is inherently not cynical (exceptions obviously) so my common sense doesn't assume that "pretty people" don't have a motivation to be nice as well. My motivation to be a nicer person isn't based on other people thinking better of me. That’s fair, we just disagree then. I think if you have less push back against a bad behaviour your lure likely to have that behaviour. That’s just common sense to me, and I don’t think it’s cynical, it’s just realistic. But it’s just opinion based on what I’ve seen and experienced, so it’s no less right or wrong than anyone else’s opinion I mean this keeps coming up in these intrinsically men v women debates... It's all very well saying I haven't seen or am not aware of... as if that is the arbitrators benchmark. It is infact just willful ignorance... in sofar as your avoid becoming informed about something so as to avoid having to make undesirable admissions that such information might prompt... I mean... its the forum of what is essentially a grumble site, or... nonetheless a double blind study and empiric evidence is the shout... lol. Would they bother there ass to read it... I think not... As its litterally right there if you Google it. But no... state you haven't seen (or searched) as that assists in validating a point at a cursory glance... But... accepted measured research dating back to about 1927 from what i understand (maybe later) by various physiological institutions around the world establishing a base line for attractiveness exists (shock horror). These also assess the various character traits of the individual...(shock horror 2) Summary, being attractive people do indeed appear to have in general more negative character traits and a less 'agreeable' nature. (Shock horror 3). We have known about this for a long time... even the Romans assessed it in a fashion... (shock horror IV) You should be aware pople seem to assume that positive interpersonal qualities and physical attractiveness are systematically linked... i.e., a “halo effect”... heard of it...? No...? See andreoni & Petrie, 2008; Callan, Powell, & Ellard, 2007; Smith, McIntosh, & Bazzini, 1999 Its essentially the reason why two men of differing aesthetics (undesirable and desirable) both asking a girl the same question can be percieved incredibly differently as an example..." The papers I have read in the original study of attractiveness was not specifically measuring attractiveness of people. Not especially in a sexual attraction. It was more about desirability. What makes something or someone attravtive in a way that a person would desire to obtain what is being viewed. To my understanding. | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. I know there's research to support positive biases towards the conventionally attractive. Across a number of areas. I haven't seen research to support your suggestion that this means pretty people are then more likely to have negative character traits. And here most people don't show their faces (including you and I) so how can we know their true attractiveness? There probably aren’t studies because it’s a hard thing to quantify But it’s common sense to me. If having pretty privilege let’s you get away with more, what pressure is there to change You let a kid be bad without consequences and he’s more likely to keep being bad You’re a stunning woman with unlimited options, what’s making you be a good person? That’s not to say they will always be a bad person, but it’s nature vs nurture, there’s usually a driving force behind change. A good example is a guy on here with no bio and a dick pic. The driving force to make him make a better profile is that fact that his current profile is getting no success. If he was getting 500 messages a day though, why would he change? He might of his own decision, but there’s no driving force behind him Your "common sense" is based on your world view. Which is inherently cynical, I think? I don't know you, I'm basing that on what I've seen you post. My worldview is inherently not cynical (exceptions obviously) so my common sense doesn't assume that "pretty people" don't have a motivation to be nice as well. My motivation to be a nicer person isn't based on other people thinking better of me. That’s fair, we just disagree then. I think if you have less push back against a bad behaviour your lure likely to have that behaviour. That’s just common sense to me, and I don’t think it’s cynical, it’s just realistic. But it’s just opinion based on what I’ve seen and experienced, so it’s no less right or wrong than anyone else’s opinion I mean this keeps coming up in these intrinsically men v women debates... It's all very well saying I haven't seen or am not aware of... as if that is the arbitrators benchmark. It is infact just willful ignorance... in sofar as your avoid becoming informed about something so as to avoid having to make undesirable admissions that such information might prompt... I mean... its the forum of what is essentially a grumble site, or... nonetheless a double blind study and empiric evidence is the shout... lol. Would they bother there ass to read it... I think not... As its litterally right there if you Google it. But no... state you haven't seen (or searched) as that assists in validating a point at a cursory glance... But... accepted measured research dating back to about 1927 from what i understand (maybe later) by various physiological institutions around the world establishing a base line for attractiveness exists (shock horror). These also assess the various character traits of the individual...(shock horror 2) Summary, being attractive people do indeed appear to have in general more negative character traits and a less 'agreeable' nature. (Shock horror 3). We have known about this for a long time... even the Romans assessed it in a fashion... (shock horror IV) You should be aware pople seem to assume that positive interpersonal qualities and physical attractiveness are systematically linked... i.e., a “halo effect”... heard of it...? No...? See andreoni & Petrie, 2008; Callan, Powell, & Ellard, 2007; Smith, McIntosh, & Bazzini, 1999 Its essentially the reason why two men of differing aesthetics (undesirable and desirable) both asking a girl the same question can be percieved incredibly differently as an example... The papers I have read in the original study of attractiveness was not specifically measuring attractiveness of people. Not especially in a sexual attraction. It was more about desirability. What makes something or someone attravtive in a way that a person would desire to obtain what is being viewed. To my understanding. " No problem... he we go... Kenrick D. T. (1989). Bridging social psychology and sociobiology: The case of sexual attraction | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person " Every woman has a long list of fuckboys they've dated? Factually incorrect | |||
"What is fucking down? A woman who's only attribute is her looks is hardly a great catch. But a less attractive woman will have much more going for her personality and can be just as attractive. Amazing looking women are often very shallow This is an often expressed point of view. I genuinely don't understand how looks dictate perceived personality when attractiveness is subjective. Probably because this “attentiveness is subjective” isn’t that true It helps people sleep at night to think everyone’s hot in their own way, but the truth is we all know whose is attractive and who isn’t in general And because we have pretty privilege, people that are attractive get away more often with being a shitty person. There’s a reason the tall, dark, handsome guy with tattoos can be such a dick and have endless women throwing themselves at him. It’s the reason every women hates fuckboys but still has a long list of fuckboys she’s dated It’s the same reason a supermodel can have half a brain and still be chased by endless men. When your really really really super good looking, you can get away with having a bunch of bad traits like being shallow or boring or nasty or whatever Ugly peoples learn quick, if you don’t wanna be alone forever, you’ve gotta not be a shitty person What about the millions of us in the middle of the two extremes? They fall in the middle But really, do you think all ugly/ unattractive people have scintillating personalities and give alms to the poor and all attractive/beautiful people are horrible and kick puppies? Not all, generally though I think it’s a good rule to follow. Nature vs nature. And pretty privilege is a pretty strong bias You only need to look at how women treat men on here because no one’s there to check them, and even if they do, they have 1000 options so they don’t care anyways Could we also look at how some men treat women on here? It applies to them too So I'm pretty (as I'm told I am) means I must be a shallow bitch? I don't see pretty privilege With men here. I have had nasty messages from across the spectrum of attractiveness. Well… if you aren’t getting pretty privilege, I’ve got bad news for youn I'll survive as I don't believe the compliments anyway. But you didn't respond to the rest of my comment. It’s a general rule, not black and white. We should all treat people for who they are, not a general rule But knowing the general rule really helps you make some quicker judgements and waste less time Pretty people are less likely to get scorned for shitty behaviour / personality traits. So in general, they’re more likely to have them It’s not black and white, but I’ve definitely seen it in action. I know there's research to support positive biases towards the conventionally attractive. Across a number of areas. I haven't seen research to support your suggestion that this means pretty people are then more likely to have negative character traits. And here most people don't show their faces (including you and I) so how can we know their true attractiveness? There probably aren’t studies because it’s a hard thing to quantify But it’s common sense to me. If having pretty privilege let’s you get away with more, what pressure is there to change You let a kid be bad without consequences and he’s more likely to keep being bad You’re a stunning woman with unlimited options, what’s making you be a good person? That’s not to say they will always be a bad person, but it’s nature vs nurture, there’s usually a driving force behind change. A good example is a guy on here with no bio and a dick pic. The driving force to make him make a better profile is that fact that his current profile is getting no success. If he was getting 500 messages a day though, why would he change? He might of his own decision, but there’s no driving force behind him Your "common sense" is based on your world view. Which is inherently cynical, I think? I don't know you, I'm basing that on what I've seen you post. My worldview is inherently not cynical (exceptions obviously) so my common sense doesn't assume that "pretty people" don't have a motivation to be nice as well. My motivation to be a nicer person isn't based on other people thinking better of me. That’s fair, we just disagree then. I think if you have less push back against a bad behaviour your lure likely to have that behaviour. That’s just common sense to me, and I don’t think it’s cynical, it’s just realistic. But it’s just opinion based on what I’ve seen and experienced, so it’s no less right or wrong than anyone else’s opinion I mean this keeps coming up in these intrinsically men v women debates... It's all very well saying I haven't seen or am not aware of... as if that is the arbitrators benchmark. It is infact just willful ignorance... in sofar as your avoid becoming informed about something so as to avoid having to make undesirable admissions that such information might prompt... I mean... its the forum of what is essentially a grumble site, or... nonetheless a double blind study and empiric evidence is the shout... lol. Would they bother there ass to read it... I think not... As its litterally right there if you Google it. But no... state you haven't seen (or searched) as that assists in validating a point at a cursory glance... But... accepted measured research dating back to about 1927 from what i understand (maybe later) by various physiological institutions around the world establishing a base line for attractiveness exists (shock horror). These also assess the various character traits of the individual...(shock horror 2) Summary, being attractive people do indeed appear to have in general more negative character traits and a less 'agreeable' nature. (Shock horror 3). We have known about this for a long time... even the Romans assessed it in a fashion... (shock horror IV) You should be aware pople seem to assume that positive interpersonal qualities and physical attractiveness are systematically linked... i.e., a “halo effect”... heard of it...? No...? See andreoni & Petrie, 2008; Callan, Powell, & Ellard, 2007; Smith, McIntosh, & Bazzini, 1999 Its essentially the reason why two men of differing aesthetics (undesirable and desirable) both asking a girl the same question can be percieved incredibly differently as an example... The papers I have read in the original study of attractiveness was not specifically measuring attractiveness of people. Not especially in a sexual attraction. It was more about desirability. What makes something or someone attravtive in a way that a person would desire to obtain what is being viewed. To my understanding. No problem... he we go... Kenrick D. T. (1989). Bridging social psychology and sociobiology: The case of sexual attraction" Not the study I was referring to. I'll need to dig through my notes to find it. | |||
| |||
" Not the study I was referring to. I'll need to dig through my notes to find it. " Doesn't matter... I'm simply showing you it exists outside of your current scope... and essentially that's my point... | |||
"Men fuck with thier dicks, women fuck with thier minds. Hence the book men are from Mars and women are from Venus
This I can get behind!
Sex to men is like food. Sure we’d all like steak sometimes, but when I’m really hungry a fish finger sandwich can really hit the spot
What woman doesn't want to be a fish finger sandwich to a man? "That’s why women are so selective They tell every women she’s his perfect steak. When in reality she’s a bowl of cereal and he’s just hungry. Sorting the 2 is very difficult Where as men? I’m just a bowl of cereal to you? Fine by me In reality plenty of men aren’t like that, and plenty of women don’t mind being a fish finger sandwich if he’s hot enough, we aren’t too dissimilar It’s just much easier for my pea sized male brain to sort everyone into binary groups, especially on here where it doesn’t matter because everyone’s just a name I don’t recognise on a forum | |||
"Men fuck with thier dicks, women fuck with thier minds. Hence the book men are from Mars and women are from Venus
This I can get behind!
Sex to men is like food. Sure we’d all like steak sometimes, but when I’m really hungry a fish finger sandwich can really hit the spot
What woman doesn't want to be a fish finger sandwich to a man?
That’s why women are so selective
They tell every women she’s his perfect steak. When in reality she’s a bowl of cereal and he’s just hungry. Sorting the 2 is very difficult
Where as men? I’m just a bowl of cereal to you? Fine by me
In reality plenty of men aren’t like that, and plenty of women don’t mind being a fish finger sandwich if he’s hot enough, we aren’t too dissimilar
It’s just much easier for my pea sized male brain to sort everyone into binary groups, especially on here where it doesn’t matter because everyone’s just a name I don’t recognise on a forum "I don't see men as interchangeable bowls of cereal. And I don't GAF how hot he is, I'm not being anyone's fish finger sandwich. I have some self- respect. Pea brain- yeah right. | |||
| |||
"Men fuck with thier dicks, women fuck with thier minds. Hence the book men are from Mars and women are from Venus
Where did you learn this pish?"From a book. | |||
