 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What does the clause say?  "
Basically
It’s a violation off the human rights act
That we the people have no say in
Basically even if the content is legel
But the government don’t want you to look at it
We be banned from it
We don’t get a voit or say in the matter
China and FB come to mind
About how the Chinese government have blocked social media because they deem it harmful to they people |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"There’ll be a change in T’s and C’s upon signing up."
Nope fab will be take off line and then re put back online with no nudity or sexual content if the government feel fit |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
For anyone wondering
Duty to address content harmful to adults: Providers of so-called ‘Category 1 services’ (currently described in the Government factsheet as those user-to-user services ‘with the largest audiences and a range of high-risk features’) have an additional duty to protect adults from content that is legal but harmful to them. Mitigation measures may include the taking down of such content, restricting users’ access to it, or limiting its recommendation and promotion |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
