FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > People with no verifications - block or not?
People with no verifications - block or not?
Jump to: Newest in thread
Not generally but specifically, when they pop up on your ‘who has looked at me’, record. If indeed you check it (which probably rules out most single women from this discussion).
I tend to - particularly if they have been around for weeks, months or whatever without a meet. My assumption is their just here to steal pictures and I don’t want them to have mine.
Have I got too much time on my hands here…? ha
M
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *lexV16Man
over a year ago
Welling |
"Not generally but specifically, when they pop up on your ‘who has looked at me’, record. If indeed you check it (which probably rules out most single women from this discussion).
I tend to - particularly if they have been around for weeks, months or whatever without a meet. My assumption is their just here to steal pictures and I don’t want them to have mine.
Have I got too much time on my hands here…? ha
M
"
No, I don’t block just because no verification or meets. That’s a bit too much of assumption on a very limited data to make informed decision.
I do block these who appears in my search but with incompatible details in there profile like looking for bbc, NO SINGLE GUYS in capital or no Bi guys. It just helps to keep search feed clear.
And obviously these who send random friend requests, rude messages and do rest unappealing moves.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not generally but specifically, when they pop up on your ‘who has looked at me’, record. If indeed you check it (which probably rules out most single women from this discussion).
I tend to - particularly if they have been around for weeks, months or whatever without a meet. My assumption is their just here to steal pictures and I don’t want them to have mine.
Have I got too much time on my hands here…? ha
M
"
How you use fab is totally your call OP.
I personally do not take any interest in checking out who has looked at me and then checking their profiles.
You only see the ones who are happy to be seen on who's looked at you. There are many (me included) that view in stealth mode. So OP my counter challenge for you is how do you know pics could be stolen by a visible voyeur or a stealth voyeur?
I think you are over thinking the risk, if you are concerned for your pics you could water mark them or hide them and only show when you want.
Also, people meet but don't seek verifications. I too am one of those people. I don't want a badge of honour from or given to anyone. I have the minimum number of verifications to permit certain things such as attending organised socials (if even required these days) other than that who I have sex with is nobody else's concern. So, what's left to be concerned about?
I am not being harsh challenging your OP, just providing an different perspective to challenge perceptions 
NBVN x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Not generally but specifically, when they pop up on your ‘who has looked at me’, record. If indeed you check it (which probably rules out most single women from this discussion).
I tend to - particularly if they have been around for weeks, months or whatever without a meet. My assumption is their just here to steal pictures and I don’t want them to have mine.
Have I got too much time on my hands here…? ha
M
"
I only block people I don't match with, or prove themselves to be a time waster |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not generally but specifically, when they pop up on your ‘who has looked at me’, record. If indeed you check it (which probably rules out most single women from this discussion).
I tend to - particularly if they have been around for weeks, months or whatever without a meet. My assumption is their just here to steal pictures and I don’t want them to have mine.
Have I got too much time on my hands here…? ha
M
"
Remember, you had none once. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I personally wouldn't do that, OP. I only look at profiles that pique my interest from the "looked at me" list, and just take it as a compliment if others have stopped by, but wouldn't block them (unless weird messages follow).
I've never assumed anyone would be stealing my pics - mainly because they're really not worth stealing!
Just out of interest, would you block a woman who looked at your profile but had no veris? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Not generally but specifically, when they pop up on your ‘who has looked at me’, record. If indeed you check it (which probably rules out most single women from this discussion).
I tend to - particularly if they have been around for weeks, months or whatever without a meet. My assumption is their just here to steal pictures and I don’t want them to have mine.
Have I got too much time on my hands here…? ha
M
How you use fab is totally your call OP.
I personally do not take any interest in checking out who has looked at me and then checking their profiles.
You only see the ones who are happy to be seen on who's looked at you. There are many (me included) that view in stealth mode. So OP my counter challenge for you is how do you know pics could be stolen by a visible voyeur or a stealth voyeur?
I think you are over thinking the risk, if you are concerned for your pics you could water mark them or hide them and only show when you want.
Also, people meet but don't seek verifications. I too am one of those people. I don't want a badge of honour from or given to anyone. I have the minimum number of verifications to permit certain things such as attending organised socials (if even required these days) other than that who I have sex with is nobody else's concern. So, what's left to be concerned about?
I am not being harsh challenging your OP, just providing an different perspective to challenge perceptions
NBVN x"
Very interesting- thanks for your perspective. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
We didn’t find getting verified to be a hard process. We first attended a club social within a couple of month of joining. Then we had our first meet after that. If we’re messaged by a new member then we look for a photo verification even more so if it’s a couple. But if a member has been here over a year with no verifications we tend to give it a miss |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Not generally but specifically, when they pop up on your ‘who has looked at me’, record. If indeed you check it (which probably rules out most single women from this discussion).
I tend to - particularly if they have been around for weeks, months or whatever without a meet. My assumption is their just here to steal pictures and I don’t want them to have mine.
Have I got too much time on my hands here…? ha
M
How you use fab is totally your call OP.
I personally do not take any interest in checking out who has looked at me and then checking their profiles.
You only see the ones who are happy to be seen on who's looked at you. There are many (me included) that view in stealth mode. So OP my counter challenge for you is how do you know pics could be stolen by a visible voyeur or a stealth voyeur?
I think you are over thinking the risk, if you are concerned for your pics you could water mark them or hide them and only show when you want.
Also, people meet but don't seek verifications. I too am one of those people. I don't want a badge of honour from or given to anyone. I have the minimum number of verifications to permit certain things such as attending organised socials (if even required these days) other than that who I have sex with is nobody else's concern. So, what's left to be concerned about?
I am not being harsh challenging your OP, just providing an different perspective to challenge perceptions
NBVN x"
While I agree with you nbvn verifications are viewed differently for men
Women on here are outnumbered to men and don’t need to display veris as I’m sure you get loads of messages however men have to display them to stand out from the crowd as it were |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I also don't assume that because someone has viewed my profile that they have any interest in me whatsoever."
No I don’t either as it happens. But if someone keeps coming back and back and they have no verifications then I tend to block. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I also don't assume that because someone has viewed my profile that they have any interest in me whatsoever.
No I don’t either as it happens. But if someone keeps coming back and back and they have no verifications then I tend to block. "
Why though? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Over of Fabguys I didn't even realise I didn't have one till someone pointed it out! (it turned out to be a reason for a picture limit I discovered). I actually had a veri on here by that point, despite me getting more action on FG!
Not everyone gives them, and I think I've only ever given one out myself, maybe 2 now I think about it (a woman I knew who asked as she needed it). It sounds mean, but I just don't think of it. I hide mine too, to me they are entirely my business and nobody else's. All you need is the one- you don't need a portfolio unless that means something to you. In fact the bigger the kinks people are into, the less they are into giving veris I expect! Doms it seems to me almost never given them, though they can get some back from subs. Just not me clearly. --pt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Everyone has to start somewhere "
Exactly this, I wouldn’t necessarily make any quick judgments and write someone off if they haven’t already got veri’s but it might make me a bit more cautious when making any plans especially if they’ve been on the site for a long time. Only sensible I think |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago
East London |
"Trying to get verified I had a lovely meet today.
When I went to verify the lady I found I can’t until she verifys me.
IS that down to the weird start veries have on this place? -pt"
You can't verify anyone until you are verified. Probably to stop fake profiles starting up and verifying themselves. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
No definitely not. 2 reasons.
I’ve met quite a few people who had no veris over the years and had no issues at all.
Also, I tell people not to verify me unless it’s a social event I’ve gone to, and I don’t leave veris either. So if I hadn’t been to lots of social events I wouldn’t have any and I’ve been here 7 years and I’m very real. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *otSoPoshWoman
over a year ago
In a ball gown because that's how we roll in N. Devon |
"I do the same thing OP
And especially if they are from this area too
I stole your photos.
Sorry. Not sorry 
Damn you  "
I'd give them back when I'm done but... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
