FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Is manscaping the way forward?
Is manscaping the way forward?
Jump to: Newest in thread
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
In the 60s, 70s and 80s, it seemed that hairy chested men like Sean Connery and Tom Selek we’re most likely to turn prospective partners weak at the knees. Today, a lot of people see that as a turn-off. How do most people feel? Is a hairy chest a turn-on or a turn-off? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think there is a fine line between too much and not enough. Back hair is not good, I like to wax Clyde’s for him, but he has very little back hair anyway. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"In the 60s, 70s and 80s, it seemed that hairy chested men like Sean Connery and Tom Selek we’re most likely to turn prospective partners weak at the knees. Today, a lot of people see that as a turn-off. How do most people feel? Is a hairy chest a turn-on or a turn-off?"
A hairless chest is a turn off for me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic