FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Does anyone else

Does anyone else

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *ndrew025 OP   Man  over a year ago

west lancs

Like the thought of cock but don’t find men remotely attractive?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Not me, I like the thought of the man the cock happens to be attached to.

NBVN x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think about my cock all the time. Hang on, let me check. Yup, still there.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ighty_tightyMan  over a year ago

Norfolk/Suffolk


"Like the thought of cock but don’t find men remotely attractive? "

Nope.

That's what's known as Fab Straight

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hrista BellendWoman  over a year ago

surrounded by twinkly lights


"Like the thought of cock but don’t find men remotely attractive?

Nope.

That's what's known as Fab Straight "

Or Bi playful

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *bi HaiveMan  over a year ago
Forum Mod

Cheeseville, Somerset


"Like the thought of cock but don’t find men remotely attractive?

Nope.

That's what's known as Fab Straight

Or Bi playful "

Yep. What the OP describes is me down to a T. Although I can spot the difference in what would generally be described as an attractive guy vs one that wouldn't be, it makes bugger all difference to me. Likewise I can spot the difference between an attractive cock and one that isn't.

And yes. Despite the fact many claim there isn't...there is definitely such a thing as an attractive cock.

A

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ea monkeyMan  over a year ago

Manchester (he/him)


"Like the thought of cock but don’t find men remotely attractive?

Nope.

That's what's known as Fab Straight

Or Bi playful

Yep. What the OP describes is me down to a T. Although I can spot the difference in what would generally be described as an attractive guy vs one that wouldn't be, it makes bugger all difference to me. Likewise I can spot the difference between an attractive cock and one that isn't.

And yes. Despite the fact many claim there isn't...there is definitely such a thing as an attractive cock.

A"

I agree with you about the aesthetics of cocks

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iscean_dreamMan  over a year ago

Llanelli

Can't say I do

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Like the thought of cock but don’t find men remotely attractive?

Nope.

That's what's known as Fab Straight

Or Bi playful

Yep. What the OP describes is me down to a T. Although I can spot the difference in what would generally be described as an attractive guy vs one that wouldn't be, it makes bugger all difference to me. Likewise I can spot the difference between an attractive cock and one that isn't.

And yes. Despite the fact many claim there isn't...there is definitely such a thing as an attractive cock.

A"

Yup I'm exactly the same. I label myself as bi to stop the questioning and confusion. A more accurate description of me would be a straight guy with a cock fetish.

I don't fancy men. But I enjoy what I can do with them.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iscean_dreamMan  over a year ago

Llanelli


"Like the thought of cock but don’t find men remotely attractive?

Nope.

That's what's known as Fab Straight

Or Bi playful

Yep. What the OP describes is me down to a T. Although I can spot the difference in what would generally be described as an attractive guy vs one that wouldn't be, it makes bugger all difference to me. Likewise I can spot the difference between an attractive cock and one that isn't.

And yes. Despite the fact many claim there isn't...there is definitely such a thing as an attractive cock.

A

Yup I'm exactly the same. I label myself as bi to stop the questioning and confusion. A more accurate description of me would be a straight guy with a cock fetish.

I don't fancy men. But I enjoy what I can do with them."

Yeah that's not confusing at all, I don't see how you can say you're straight but like cock. Surely that just makes you bi, you can't be a vegetarian and say you like eating mince mint because of what you can do with it

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular "

Exactly. Thank you.

To be bi I'd have to be willing to enter into a relationship with a guy or be romantically involved somehow. I have zero interest in that whatsoever. Never once ever fancied a guy in the slightest.

As a previous poster said I can tell a good looking guy from an ugly one. We can all do that. Doesn't mean I want to invite one out for a meal. Never gonna happen. I'll suck his cock though haha

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iscean_dreamMan  over a year ago

Llanelli


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular "

Makes no sense at all from my point of view as a straight man that is attracted to only women and doesn't like cock.

Also if playing with the same sex isn't a homosexual act then the dictionary needs updating because somewhere along the line people have changed the terms and conditions

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iscean_dreamMan  over a year ago

Llanelli


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular

Exactly. Thank you.

To be bi I'd have to be willing to enter into a relationship with a guy or be romantically involved somehow. I have zero interest in that whatsoever. Never once ever fancied a guy in the slightest.

As a previous poster said I can tell a good looking guy from an ugly one. We can all do that. Doesn't mean I want to invite one out for a meal. Never gonna happen. I'll suck his cock though haha "

Relationships don't come into it though, I'm not interested in being in a relationship with anyone at the moment as it's draining

I'm not nit picking, just trying to understand but I probably never will

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular

Makes no sense at all from my point of view as a straight man that is attracted to only women and doesn't like cock.

Also if playing with the same sex isn't a homosexual act then the dictionary needs updating because somewhere along the line people have changed the terms and conditions "

OK let me try and explain.

Homosexual men are attracted to men. They have sex as a consequence of being on some level romantically interested in them. Even if it's just a physical attraction.

Bisexual men are the same only with either a man or a woman. There is some level of physical attraction.

I don't have that attraction. For me it's not the person it's the act. I enjoy the experience and sensations that come with that act.

The person providing them is of little consequence. The fact that some of those experiences can only happen with men doesn't mean I'm attracted to them. It means they are literally the only way I can get that particular form of enjoyment.

If I could find a biological woman with a cock I'd never go near a man again. But as that's never going to happen then I have to make do. And as the other poster said. Now you know why trans porn is popular. Its the closest any of us will ever get to that experience.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Like the thought of cock but don’t find men remotely attractive? "

Yep! Me exactly.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ndrew025 OP   Man  over a year ago

west lancs


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

Good point with the trans. I think

This would be ideal. I never see a man and think whoa he’s good looking or I want to jump in bed with him. I do with women every day lol. But I do get the urge to play with a nice cock. I do find some trans attractive

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular "

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ora the explorerWoman  over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular

Makes no sense at all from my point of view as a straight man that is attracted to only women and doesn't like cock.

Also if playing with the same sex isn't a homosexual act then the dictionary needs updating because somewhere along the line people have changed the terms and conditions

OK let me try and explain.

Homosexual men are attracted to men. They have sex as a consequence of being on some level romantically interested in them. Even if it's just a physical attraction.

Bisexual men are the same only with either a man or a woman. There is some level of physical attraction.

I don't have that attraction. For me it's not the person it's the act. I enjoy the experience and sensations that come with that act.

The person providing them is of little consequence. The fact that some of those experiences can only happen with men doesn't mean I'm attracted to them. It means they are literally the only way I can get that particular form of enjoyment.

If I could find a biological woman with a cock I'd never go near a man again. But as that's never going to happen then I have to make do. And as the other poster said. Now you know why trans porn is popular. Its the closest any of us will ever get to that experience."

That’s like me though. I’m only physically attracted to women. Never ever would I be romantically attracted or have a relationship with a woman. I’d never dream of calling myself straight though. Because I’m not.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

So with all that text above.

If I’m attracted to a woman who happens to have a cock,……?…..

I just like women. Men are never as pretty or as hot as a woman can be. *just my opinion.

And a cock on a man has no appeal to me.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iscean_dreamMan  over a year ago

Llanelli


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular

Makes no sense at all from my point of view as a straight man that is attracted to only women and doesn't like cock.

Also if playing with the same sex isn't a homosexual act then the dictionary needs updating because somewhere along the line people have changed the terms and conditions

OK let me try and explain.

Homosexual men are attracted to men. They have sex as a consequence of being on some level romantically interested in them. Even if it's just a physical attraction.

Bisexual men are the same only with either a man or a woman. There is some level of physical attraction.

I don't have that attraction. For me it's not the person it's the act. I enjoy the experience and sensations that come with that act.

The person providing them is of little consequence. The fact that some of those experiences can only happen with men doesn't mean I'm attracted to them. It means they are literally the only way I can get that particular form of enjoyment.

If I could find a biological woman with a cock I'd never go near a man again. But as that's never going to happen then I have to make do. And as the other poster said. Now you know why trans porn is popular. Its the closest any of us will ever get to that experience."

I can get my head around the attraction mentally wise, it's just the wanting to play with cock part.

As long as you're having fun and keeping safe that's all that matters really anyway

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"So with all that text above.

If I’m attracted to a woman who happens to have a cock,……?…..

I just like women. Men are never as pretty or as hot as a woman can be. *just my opinion.

And a cock on a man has no appeal to me. "

Yeah I generally agree with that. However. You have to look around. I've seen quite a few that even I've found attractive haha. Not afraid to admit it. Again though I'm attracted to the femininity they portray.

Bailey Jay for example, she does things for me. My taste in women are extremely close to the kind of woman Bailey looks like.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ockosaurusMan  over a year ago

Warwick


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular

Makes no sense at all from my point of view as a straight man that is attracted to only women and doesn't like cock.

Also if playing with the same sex isn't a homosexual act then the dictionary needs updating because somewhere along the line people have changed the terms and conditions "

The problem is Fab doesn't have the terms to discribe it properly.

Someone could be bi in the way they feel physically and romantic attraction to men and women.

But then someone could be bi in the way that they only feel romantic attraction to one, but sexual to both.

To some that is a big difference, but they have no way to distinguish it on here, so they pick the option that best fits with how they feel.

Most 'fab straight' that I've seen detail it in their profile, so as long as you read profiles, does it really matter?

Personally, I don't think it care what anyone is as long as they respect others boundaries, just as I'd expect in a heterosexual meet.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ora the explorerWoman  over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular

Makes no sense at all from my point of view as a straight man that is attracted to only women and doesn't like cock.

Also if playing with the same sex isn't a homosexual act then the dictionary needs updating because somewhere along the line people have changed the terms and conditions

The problem is Fab doesn't have the terms to discribe it properly.

Someone could be bi in the way they feel physically and romantic attraction to men and women.

But then someone could be bi in the way that they only feel romantic attraction to one, but sexual to both.

To some that is a big difference, but they have no way to distinguish it on here, so they pick the option that best fits with how they feel.

Most 'fab straight' that I've seen detail it in their profile, so as long as you read profiles, does it really matter?

Personally, I don't think it care what anyone is as long as they respect others boundaries, just as I'd expect in a heterosexual meet. "

I hate labels. But fab has them and people use them and there are 4 to choose from. If people like to play with the genitals of the same sex then why put straight? I don’t get it. What’s wrong with bi curious. If you are using the labels then that’s not straight.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ockosaurusMan  over a year ago

Warwick


"...

I can get my head around the attraction mentally wise, it's just the wanting to play with cock part.

As long as you're having fun and keeping safe that's all that matters really anyway "

I guess you can't get your head around it because it's not for you (or me btw).

The same as non-drinkers can't understand the desire to drink and get d*unk.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ockosaurusMan  over a year ago

Warwick


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular

Makes no sense at all from my point of view as a straight man that is attracted to only women and doesn't like cock.

Also if playing with the same sex isn't a homosexual act then the dictionary needs updating because somewhere along the line people have changed the terms and conditions

The problem is Fab doesn't have the terms to discribe it properly.

Someone could be bi in the way they feel physically and romantic attraction to men and women.

But then someone could be bi in the way that they only feel romantic attraction to one, but sexual to both.

To some that is a big difference, but they have no way to distinguish it on here, so they pick the option that best fits with how they feel.

Most 'fab straight' that I've seen detail it in their profile, so as long as you read profiles, does it really matter?

Personally, I don't think it care what anyone is as long as they respect others boundaries, just as I'd expect in a heterosexual meet.

I hate labels. But fab has them and people use them and there are 4 to choose from. If people like to play with the genitals of the same sex then why put straight? I don’t get it. What’s wrong with bi curious. If you are using the labels then that’s not straight. "

Well bi curious isn't necessarily right either is it?

You are making the choice that bi-curious is more right for them than straight is.

That's not our decision to make.

Labels are for an individual to give themselves, not for us to assign them.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iscean_dreamMan  over a year ago

Llanelli


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular

Makes no sense at all from my point of view as a straight man that is attracted to only women and doesn't like cock.

Also if playing with the same sex isn't a homosexual act then the dictionary needs updating because somewhere along the line people have changed the terms and conditions

The problem is Fab doesn't have the terms to discribe it properly.

Someone could be bi in the way they feel physically and romantic attraction to men and women.

But then someone could be bi in the way that they only feel romantic attraction to one, but sexual to both.

To some that is a big difference, but they have no way to distinguish it on here, so they pick the option that best fits with how they feel.

Most 'fab straight' that I've seen detail it in their profile, so as long as you read profiles, does it really matter?

Personally, I don't think it care what anyone is as long as they respect others boundaries, just as I'd expect in a heterosexual meet. "

All I know is the world gets more and more confusing as the years go by.

Got people marrying weird objects and animals, people that see themselves as trees and various other things.

Can we just go back to the 90's maybe

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ora the explorerWoman  over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular

Makes no sense at all from my point of view as a straight man that is attracted to only women and doesn't like cock.

Also if playing with the same sex isn't a homosexual act then the dictionary needs updating because somewhere along the line people have changed the terms and conditions

The problem is Fab doesn't have the terms to discribe it properly.

Someone could be bi in the way they feel physically and romantic attraction to men and women.

But then someone could be bi in the way that they only feel romantic attraction to one, but sexual to both.

To some that is a big difference, but they have no way to distinguish it on here, so they pick the option that best fits with how they feel.

Most 'fab straight' that I've seen detail it in their profile, so as long as you read profiles, does it really matter?

Personally, I don't think it care what anyone is as long as they respect others boundaries, just as I'd expect in a heterosexual meet.

I hate labels. But fab has them and people use them and there are 4 to choose from. If people like to play with the genitals of the same sex then why put straight? I don’t get it. What’s wrong with bi curious. If you are using the labels then that’s not straight.

Well bi curious isn't necessarily right either is it?

You are making the choice that bi-curious is more right for them than straight is.

That's not our decision to make.

Labels are for an individual to give themselves, not for us to assign them."

Well to me that’s lying then. The labels are there. If a man has sex with a man and labels himself straight thats lying.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iscean_dreamMan  over a year ago

Llanelli


"...

I can get my head around the attraction mentally wise, it's just the wanting to play with cock part.

As long as you're having fun and keeping safe that's all that matters really anyway

I guess you can't get your head around it because it's not for you (or me btw).

The same as non-drinkers can't understand the desire to drink and get d*unk. "

Yes agree, it's hard to see things from someone's view if you aren't there yourself. That's why we're all unique of which I'm grateful for

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Not me, I like the thought of the man the cock happens to be attached to.

NBVN x"

Shows how men and some women really think.

Men are very visual as iam sure some women are.

But most women like to put a face to the body. Know of the personality. And have a connection and feeling to the man.

Men would happily fill and enter any wett hole.

As some say,she hot a pulse! That will do..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Bi curious means to me, I find some women attractive, but not sure I'd want a whole one to myself...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *etcplCouple  over a year ago

Gapping Fanny

I think everyones a cock all the time so

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iscean_dreamMan  over a year ago

Llanelli


"Not me, I like the thought of the man the cock happens to be attached to.

NBVN x

Shows how men and some women really think.

Men are very visual as iam sure some women are.

But most women like to put a face to the body. Know of the personality. And have a connection and feeling to the man.

Men would happily fill and enter any wett hole.

As some say,she hot a pulse! That will do..

"

Yeah I'm definitely not one of those men, I don't have to want a relationship with someone but they do have to be female and I do have to find them attractive for me to want to have sex with them and they also have to have a nice personality

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *riel13Woman  over a year ago

Northampton

Oohhh no! I love cock and find some men ridiculously attractive

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ockosaurusMan  over a year ago

Warwick


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular

Makes no sense at all from my point of view as a straight man that is attracted to only women and doesn't like cock.

Also if playing with the same sex isn't a homosexual act then the dictionary needs updating because somewhere along the line people have changed the terms and conditions

The problem is Fab doesn't have the terms to discribe it properly.

Someone could be bi in the way they feel physically and romantic attraction to men and women.

But then someone could be bi in the way that they only feel romantic attraction to one, but sexual to both.

To some that is a big difference, but they have no way to distinguish it on here, so they pick the option that best fits with how they feel.

Most 'fab straight' that I've seen detail it in their profile, so as long as you read profiles, does it really matter?

Personally, I don't think it care what anyone is as long as they respect others boundaries, just as I'd expect in a heterosexual meet.

I hate labels. But fab has them and people use them and there are 4 to choose from. If people like to play with the genitals of the same sex then why put straight? I don’t get it. What’s wrong with bi curious. If you are using the labels then that’s not straight.

Well bi curious isn't necessarily right either is it?

You are making the choice that bi-curious is more right for them than straight is.

That's not our decision to make.

Labels are for an individual to give themselves, not for us to assign them.

Well to me that’s lying then. The labels are there. If a man has sex with a man and labels himself straight thats lying. "

But if a man labels himself as bi-curious when he isn't totally (some people don't look for it, but just go with the flow in group situations), isn't that's lying too.

As I said, who really cares?

As long as they are happy, and don't step o er anyone's boundaries then why should it bother anyone else?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ockosaurusMan  over a year ago

Warwick


"Not me, I like the thought of the man the cock happens to be attached to.

NBVN x

Shows how men and some women really think.

Men are very visual as iam sure some women are.

But most women like to put a face to the body. Know of the personality. And have a connection and feeling to the man.

Men would happily fill and enter any wett hole.

As some say,she hot a pulse! That will do..

"

Umm... Speak for yourself.

This is not a men / women thing, but an individual thing.

Many men won't just fuck anyone, even if they have a good body.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ora the explorerWoman  over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"amazes me that so many people don't understand that sexuality is about being attracted to the whole package not just the genitals.

To be bisexual you would need to be attracted to both men and women not just vaginas and penises

To be homosexual a man would be attracted to other men, as the op states he isn't attracted to men then neither of these sexualities would fit.

However, now you can work out why trans porn is so popular

Makes no sense at all from my point of view as a straight man that is attracted to only women and doesn't like cock.

Also if playing with the same sex isn't a homosexual act then the dictionary needs updating because somewhere along the line people have changed the terms and conditions

The problem is Fab doesn't have the terms to discribe it properly.

Someone could be bi in the way they feel physically and romantic attraction to men and women.

But then someone could be bi in the way that they only feel romantic attraction to one, but sexual to both.

To some that is a big difference, but they have no way to distinguish it on here, so they pick the option that best fits with how they feel.

Most 'fab straight' that I've seen detail it in their profile, so as long as you read profiles, does it really matter?

Personally, I don't think it care what anyone is as long as they respect others boundaries, just as I'd expect in a heterosexual meet.

I hate labels. But fab has them and people use them and there are 4 to choose from. If people like to play with the genitals of the same sex then why put straight? I don’t get it. What’s wrong with bi curious. If you are using the labels then that’s not straight.

Well bi curious isn't necessarily right either is it?

You are making the choice that bi-curious is more right for them than straight is.

That's not our decision to make.

Labels are for an individual to give themselves, not for us to assign them.

Well to me that’s lying then. The labels are there. If a man has sex with a man and labels himself straight thats lying.

But if a man labels himself as bi-curious when he isn't totally (some people don't look for it, but just go with the flow in group situations), isn't that's lying too.

As I said, who really cares?

As long as they are happy, and don't step o er anyone's boundaries then why should it bother anyone else?"

True who really cares anyway.

I’d never be in a go with the flow situation anyway and I know people pretty well before we meet so yeah I don’t care. Some may though so was just pointing it out

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *ockosaurusMan  over a year ago

Warwick

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0468

0