FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > 59% of English football fans want a super league
59% of English football fans want a super league
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Just watched the documentary "Kicking Off" on iplayer. The final comment is from the chairman of Palace questioning the research that said "59% of English fans want a super league" he then says "who are they asking?".
They're asking TV fans. The ones who pack the pubs in London at the tail end of the season.The "die hard" Liverpool fans who have never seen the City let alone been to Anfield.
I'm not a proper supporter either, but I don't pretend to be. I think TV ruined football 20 odd years ago. What do actual football supporters think? Are any of you here? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
As a Man United fan from Derby who mostly watches them on TV, the Super League is a dreadful idea. From a football perspective, what gives us the right to be among Europe's elite with how we've been performing the past decade when Leicester have won the league and FA cup more recently?
From a financial perspective, it's a cash grab to make the rich clubs stay rich because they don't have the jeopardy of missing out on Champions League football and missing out on that payout as a result. It allows Real Madrid and Barca and Juve to remain bankrolled so they can continue to dominate their leagues. It's driven by greed and takes away all that is romantic about football. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As a Man United fan from Derby who mostly watches them on TV, the Super League is a dreadful idea. From a football perspective, what gives us the right to be among Europe's elite with how we've been performing the past decade when Leicester have won the league and FA cup more recently?
From a financial perspective, it's a cash grab to make the rich clubs stay rich because they don't have the jeopardy of missing out on Champions League football and missing out on that payout as a result. It allows Real Madrid and Barca and Juve to remain bankrolled so they can continue to dominate their leagues. It's driven by greed and takes away all that is romantic about football."
If you could be promoted to and relegated from the super league would you be interested? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a Man United fan from Derby who mostly watches them on TV, the Super League is a dreadful idea. From a football perspective, what gives us the right to be among Europe's elite with how we've been performing the past decade when Leicester have won the league and FA cup more recently?
From a financial perspective, it's a cash grab to make the rich clubs stay rich because they don't have the jeopardy of missing out on Champions League football and missing out on that payout as a result. It allows Real Madrid and Barca and Juve to remain bankrolled so they can continue to dominate their leagues. It's driven by greed and takes away all that is romantic about football."
It’s a cash grab by EUFA |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"As a Man United fan from Derby who mostly watches them on TV, the Super League is a dreadful idea. From a football perspective, what gives us the right to be among Europe's elite with how we've been performing the past decade when Leicester have won the league and FA cup more recently?
From a financial perspective, it's a cash grab to make the rich clubs stay rich because they don't have the jeopardy of missing out on Champions League football and missing out on that payout as a result. It allows Real Madrid and Barca and Juve to remain bankrolled so they can continue to dominate their leagues. It's driven by greed and takes away all that is romantic about football.
If you could be promoted to and relegated from the super league would you be interested?"
That goes against the idea of the Super League that was first presented. If that was possible then it's just another version of a Champions League where relegated "big teams" would miss out on the financial rewards |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obajxMan
over a year ago
Cheshire |
As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
I thought the romance of football was dead years ago. When TV companies took part in scheduling the following season's fixtures.
Early this century I saw a fixture which was Bournemouth (could've been Portsmouth, but I think I'm right) v Newcastle on a weds night. I thought "Jesus those away fans are gonna have to take the fat end of two days off work for that". TV doesn't give a fuck about football fans.
Watching last night's game was entertaining. A memorable match, but romantic? Na. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans"
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As a Man United fan from Derby who mostly watches them on TV, the Super League is a dreadful idea. From a football perspective, what gives us the right to be among Europe's elite with how we've been performing the past decade when Leicester have won the league and FA cup more recently?
From a financial perspective, it's a cash grab to make the rich clubs stay rich because they don't have the jeopardy of missing out on Champions League football and missing out on that payout as a result. It allows Real Madrid and Barca and Juve to remain bankrolled so they can continue to dominate their leagues. It's driven by greed and takes away all that is romantic about football.
If you could be promoted to and relegated from the super league would you be interested?
That goes against the idea of the Super League that was first presented. If that was possible then it's just another version of a Champions League where relegated "big teams" would miss out on the financial rewards"
Yeah, I guess my point is that we all agree it is driven by greed. I think all top flight football is. The Champions League being the pinnacle of all that. So what's the difference? Just the lack of relegation and promotion? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It’s a shameless cash grab by teams who are scared of someone doing a Leicester again. The same teams who opposed the Newcastle takeover. If they try again the should be kicked out of the Premier League.
Sport is about competition and they’re trying to put an end to that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obajxMan
over a year ago
Cheshire |
"I thought the romance of football was dead years ago. When TV companies took part in scheduling the following season's fixtures.
Early this century I saw a fixture which was Bournemouth (could've been Portsmouth, but I think I'm right) v Newcastle on a weds night. I thought "Jesus those away fans are gonna have to take the fat end of two days off work for that". TV doesn't give a fuck about football fans.
Watching last night's game was entertaining. A memorable match, but romantic? Na. "
When football resumed with no supporters, we were told football is nothing without fans, yet we are still treated like shit by the broadcasters/FA/Premier league
To give to very recent examples of my club
An FA cup semi final arranged in London, between two north west clubs when there are no trains from the NW that weekend
And whilst the Womens game is being promoted like mad, City women are in their FA Cup final next Sunday, 2.30pm kick off
Meanwhile the mens team is scheduled to play West Ham in london the same day at 4.30pm
This week, the mens fixture has been brought forward to a 2pm kick off |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It’s a shameless cash grab by teams who are scared of someone doing a Leicester again. The same teams who opposed the Newcastle takeover. If they try again the should be kicked out of the Premier League.
Sport is about competition and they’re trying to put an end to that."
Agreed. English fans pretty much destroyed it too. Good for them. The rest of Europe seemed alright with it. Especially Spain. So what's happened to football? I blame the TV companies. What do you think? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I thought the romance of football was dead years ago. When TV companies took part in scheduling the following season's fixtures.
Early this century I saw a fixture which was Bournemouth (could've been Portsmouth, but I think I'm right) v Newcastle on a weds night. I thought "Jesus those away fans are gonna have to take the fat end of two days off work for that". TV doesn't give a fuck about football fans.
Watching last night's game was entertaining. A memorable match, but romantic? Na.
When football resumed with no supporters, we were told football is nothing without fans, yet we are still treated like shit by the broadcasters/FA/Premier league
To give to very recent examples of my club
An FA cup semi final arranged in London, between two north west clubs when there are no trains from the NW that weekend
And whilst the Womens game is being promoted like mad, City women are in their FA Cup final next Sunday, 2.30pm kick off
Meanwhile the mens team is scheduled to play West Ham in london the same day at 4.30pm
This week, the mens fixture has been brought forward to a 2pm kick off"
Sucks doesn't it. The last top flight game I went to was 8 or 9 years ago. Valencia v Deportivo it was €10 a ticket. I asked a local if it was always that price he said "it can get very expensive if Barca come to play" apparently expensive was €20-25. 
They don't mistreat their fans it seems. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It’s a shameless cash grab by teams who are scared of someone doing a Leicester again. The same teams who opposed the Newcastle takeover. If they try again the should be kicked out of the Premier League.
Sport is about competition and they’re trying to put an end to that.
Agreed. English fans pretty much destroyed it too. Good for them. The rest of Europe seemed alright with it. Especially Spain. So what's happened to football? I blame the TV companies. What do you think?"
I think it’s greedy owners. Mostly American owners who want to make football more like the Super Bowl. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It’s a shameless cash grab by teams who are scared of someone doing a Leicester again. The same teams who opposed the Newcastle takeover. If they try again the should be kicked out of the Premier League.
Sport is about competition and they’re trying to put an end to that.
Agreed. English fans pretty much destroyed it too. Good for them. The rest of Europe seemed alright with it. Especially Spain. So what's happened to football? I blame the TV companies. What do you think?
I think it’s greedy owners. Mostly American owners who want to make football more like the Super Bowl."
The champions League final looks exactly like the superbowl (I love how my phone always corrects that to superb owl) to me. 50 million times bigger too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It’s a shameless cash grab by teams who are scared of someone doing a Leicester again. The same teams who opposed the Newcastle takeover. If they try again the should be kicked out of the Premier League.
Sport is about competition and they’re trying to put an end to that.
Agreed. English fans pretty much destroyed it too. Good for them. The rest of Europe seemed alright with it. Especially Spain. So what's happened to football? I blame the TV companies. What do you think?
I think it’s greedy owners. Mostly American owners who want to make football more like the Super Bowl.
The champions League final looks exactly like the superbowl (I love how my phone always corrects that to superb owl) to me. 50 million times bigger too. "
Minus the ridiculous adverts and unnecessary halftime show. If a sport needs entertainment halfway through it’s clearly not entertaining enough. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities."
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It’s a shameless cash grab by teams who are scared of someone doing a Leicester again. The same teams who opposed the Newcastle takeover. If they try again the should be kicked out of the Premier League.
Sport is about competition and they’re trying to put an end to that.
Agreed. English fans pretty much destroyed it too. Good for them. The rest of Europe seemed alright with it. Especially Spain. So what's happened to football? I blame the TV companies. What do you think?
I think it’s greedy owners. Mostly American owners who want to make football more like the Super Bowl.
The champions League final looks exactly like the superbowl (I love how my phone always corrects that to superb owl) to me. 50 million times bigger too.
Minus the ridiculous adverts and unnecessary halftime show. If a sport needs entertainment halfway through it’s clearly not entertaining enough. "
A very good point. American sports developed alongside TV tho, they grew together. Ours have been part of a hostile takeover.
Can you imagine how much a 15 second ad during half time of the champions league would cost. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities.
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team"
Does it not? Educate me. Yeah fans have been priced out and I feel for them, but how can you support your team if you're not there? Buying merchandise maybe? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans"
In fairness, the Americans at United are royally fucking the club up. Whereas at Liverpool they seem to be doing it right.
That being said, I really don't want American owners at Chelsea. Or any consortium for that matter.
As for the super league, that idea can fuck right off.
I want to see my team fighting for multiple trophies, not just one that no-one else is invited into.
I don't want to see my club play the same teams over and over a fucking gain.
It's hard enough getting to games here, let alone traveling all over Europe to watch a game. I think the PL, or telly in particular needs a kick in the bollocks. 8.30 kick offs midweek, miles away from home. There's fuck all like making it easy for the true supporters.
I want to see a club from the lower leagues giving those in the Premier League a battle.
I want to see the glory and the struggles my team faces.
If my club is successful or is relegated, that's part of the game. Take that away, take the supporters away, and the games lost whatever soul its got left.
I know plenty of football supporters. I don't know one who was in favour of the Super League. And whoever thought it up is a cunt.
And breathe..... 
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities.
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team
Does it not? Educate me. Yeah fans have been priced out and I feel for them, but how can you support your team if you're not there? Buying merchandise maybe?"
I mean no disrespect BTW. After watching that doc today I have started pondering what football culture is so I'm here to listen. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
In fairness, the Americans at United are royally fucking the club up. Whereas at Liverpool they seem to be doing it right.
That being said, I really don't want American owners at Chelsea. Or any consortium for that matter.
As for the super league, that idea can fuck right off.
I want to see my team fighting for multiple trophies, not just one that no-one else is invited into.
I don't want to see my club play the same teams over and over a fucking gain.
It's hard enough getting to games here, let alone traveling all over Europe to watch a game. I think the PL, or telly in particular needs a kick in the bollocks. 8.30 kick offs midweek, miles away from home. There's fuck all like making it easy for the true supporters.
I want to see a club from the lower leagues giving those in the Premier League a battle.
I want to see the glory and the struggles my team faces.
If my club is successful or is relegated, that's part of the game. Take that away, take the supporters away, and the games lost whatever soul its got left.
I know plenty of football supporters. I don't know one who was in favour of the Super League. And whoever thought it up is a cunt.
And breathe.....
Winston"
That's quite a forthright and articulate diatribe, sir. Well spoken. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities.
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team
Does it not? Educate me. Yeah fans have been priced out and I feel for them, but how can you support your team if you're not there? Buying merchandise maybe?"
I used to go to 3-4 games a season and buy the shirts before Mike Ashley. Now I’ve got a young family and wouldn’t want to spend my weekends away from them at the match. I still think I’m a proper fan. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities.
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team
Does it not? Educate me. Yeah fans have been priced out and I feel for them, but how can you support your team if you're not there? Buying merchandise maybe?"
Yes merchandise makes up a big part of a teams income, especially at almost 100 quid for a top or 60 odd for the cheaper option. That's a lot of money if you're buying 2 or 3 kits and on a low income. For you to be saying you aren't a proper supporter if don't go to the games you must either live local to your team or have money to burn that you don't need for other things |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities.
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team
Does it not? Educate me. Yeah fans have been priced out and I feel for them, but how can you support your team if you're not there? Buying merchandise maybe?
Yes merchandise makes up a big part of a teams income, especially at almost 100 quid for a top or 60 odd for the cheaper option. That's a lot of money if you're buying 2 or 3 kits and on a low income. For you to be saying you aren't a proper supporter if don't go to the games you must either live local to your team or have money to burn that you don't need for other things "
I do believe in supporting your local team, yeah. Before TV you had to. I think I'm prehistoric tho |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities.
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team
Does it not? Educate me. Yeah fans have been priced out and I feel for them, but how can you support your team if you're not there? Buying merchandise maybe?
Yes merchandise makes up a big part of a teams income, especially at almost 100 quid for a top or 60 odd for the cheaper option. That's a lot of money if you're buying 2 or 3 kits and on a low income. For you to be saying you aren't a proper supporter if don't go to the games you must either live local to your team or have money to burn that you don't need for other things
I do believe in supporting your local team, yeah. Before TV you had to. I think I'm prehistoric tho"
So if you move are you going to support a different team then? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
In fairness, the Americans at United are royally fucking the club up. Whereas at Liverpool they seem to be doing it right.
That being said, I really don't want American owners at Chelsea. Or any consortium for that matter.
As for the super league, that idea can fuck right off.
I want to see my team fighting for multiple trophies, not just one that no-one else is invited into.
I don't want to see my club play the same teams over and over a fucking gain.
It's hard enough getting to games here, let alone traveling all over Europe to watch a game. I think the PL, or telly in particular needs a kick in the bollocks. 8.30 kick offs midweek, miles away from home. There's fuck all like making it easy for the true supporters.
I want to see a club from the lower leagues giving those in the Premier League a battle.
I want to see the glory and the struggles my team faces.
If my club is successful or is relegated, that's part of the game. Take that away, take the supporters away, and the games lost whatever soul its got left.
I know plenty of football supporters. I don't know one who was in favour of the Super League. And whoever thought it up is a cunt.
And breathe.....
Winston
That's quite a forthright and articulate diatribe, sir. Well spoken. "
The whole travelling to games here is a nightmare. Lady Astor has a home and away season for her particular torture.
A few weeks ago, away game at Newcastle.
8.30pm kick off.
Tuesday night.
So many hours on the coach the driver has to stop for a 45 minute break on the way home.
They got in at 3am Wednesday morning.
For those hard of thinking telly schedulers, THATS A FUCKING WORK DAY.
Pricks.
Winston
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities.
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team
Does it not? Educate me. Yeah fans have been priced out and I feel for them, but how can you support your team if you're not there? Buying merchandise maybe?
Yes merchandise makes up a big part of a teams income, especially at almost 100 quid for a top or 60 odd for the cheaper option. That's a lot of money if you're buying 2 or 3 kits and on a low income. For you to be saying you aren't a proper supporter if don't go to the games you must either live local to your team or have money to burn that you don't need for other things
I do believe in supporting your local team, yeah. Before TV you had to. I think I'm prehistoric tho
So if you move are you going to support a different team then? "
There's a shit load of Polish Millwall fans round my way so yeah. I'm sure they follow their home team on the telly too. I'm not criticising you PD, but I am questioning football culture in general. What it has become etc. I used to love football, but I've wondered off now, disinterested and out of touch.
Again, I don't consider myself a proper football fan because I've been to no more than a couple of dozen games in my life. I'd love to go to Anfield and hear them sing You'll Never Walk Alone, but the section I'm in will sing "daytripper" at me and they'd be right. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
In fairness, the Americans at United are royally fucking the club up. Whereas at Liverpool they seem to be doing it right.
That being said, I really don't want American owners at Chelsea. Or any consortium for that matter.
As for the super league, that idea can fuck right off.
I want to see my team fighting for multiple trophies, not just one that no-one else is invited into.
I don't want to see my club play the same teams over and over a fucking gain.
It's hard enough getting to games here, let alone traveling all over Europe to watch a game. I think the PL, or telly in particular needs a kick in the bollocks. 8.30 kick offs midweek, miles away from home. There's fuck all like making it easy for the true supporters.
I want to see a club from the lower leagues giving those in the Premier League a battle.
I want to see the glory and the struggles my team faces.
If my club is successful or is relegated, that's part of the game. Take that away, take the supporters away, and the games lost whatever soul its got left.
I know plenty of football supporters. I don't know one who was in favour of the Super League. And whoever thought it up is a cunt.
And breathe.....
Winston
That's quite a forthright and articulate diatribe, sir. Well spoken.
The whole travelling to games here is a nightmare. Lady Astor has a home and away season for her particular torture.
A few weeks ago, away game at Newcastle.
8.30pm kick off.
Tuesday night.
So many hours on the coach the driver has to stop for a 45 minute break on the way home.
They got in at 3am Wednesday morning.
For those hard of thinking telly schedulers, THATS A FUCKING WORK DAY.
Pricks.
Winston
"
I hear you. The rot started forming in my interest in football when I noticed such fixtures 25 years ago. The Valencia match I mentioned certainly didn't help. There's some decent non league teams near me. I should go support them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities.
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team
Does it not? Educate me. Yeah fans have been priced out and I feel for them, but how can you support your team if you're not there? Buying merchandise maybe?
Yes merchandise makes up a big part of a teams income, especially at almost 100 quid for a top or 60 odd for the cheaper option. That's a lot of money if you're buying 2 or 3 kits and on a low income. For you to be saying you aren't a proper supporter if don't go to the games you must either live local to your team or have money to burn that you don't need for other things
I do believe in supporting your local team, yeah. Before TV you had to. I think I'm prehistoric tho
So if you move are you going to support a different team then?
There's a shit load of Polish Millwall fans round my way so yeah. I'm sure they follow their home team on the telly too. I'm not criticising you PD, but I am questioning football culture in general. What it has become etc. I used to love football, but I've wondered off now, disinterested and out of touch.
Again, I don't consider myself a proper football fan because I've been to no more than a couple of dozen games in my life. I'd love to go to Anfield and hear them sing You'll Never Walk Alone, but the section I'm in will sing "daytripper" at me and they'd be right. "
I've unfortunately only been to one game at Anfield but I'd go to every game if I won the lottery or someone wanted to pay for me to go  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities.
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team
Does it not? Educate me. Yeah fans have been priced out and I feel for them, but how can you support your team if you're not there? Buying merchandise maybe?
Yes merchandise makes up a big part of a teams income, especially at almost 100 quid for a top or 60 odd for the cheaper option. That's a lot of money if you're buying 2 or 3 kits and on a low income. For you to be saying you aren't a proper supporter if don't go to the games you must either live local to your team or have money to burn that you don't need for other things
I do believe in supporting your local team, yeah. Before TV you had to. I think I'm prehistoric tho
So if you move are you going to support a different team then?
There's a shit load of Polish Millwall fans round my way so yeah. I'm sure they follow their home team on the telly too. I'm not criticising you PD, but I am questioning football culture in general. What it has become etc. I used to love football, but I've wondered off now, disinterested and out of touch.
Again, I don't consider myself a proper football fan because I've been to no more than a couple of dozen games in my life. I'd love to go to Anfield and hear them sing You'll Never Walk Alone, but the section I'm in will sing "daytripper" at me and they'd be right.
I've unfortunately only been to one game at Anfield but I'd go to every game if I won the lottery or someone wanted to pay for me to go "
It is eye wateringly expensive in this country. Its just England too. I've been to games in Spain and Italy, my mates go to German games all the time. If it works there... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
In fairness, the Americans at United are royally fucking the club up. Whereas at Liverpool they seem to be doing it right.
That being said, I really don't want American owners at Chelsea. Or any consortium for that matter.
As for the super league, that idea can fuck right off.
I want to see my team fighting for multiple trophies, not just one that no-one else is invited into.
I don't want to see my club play the same teams over and over a fucking gain.
It's hard enough getting to games here, let alone traveling all over Europe to watch a game. I think the PL, or telly in particular needs a kick in the bollocks. 8.30 kick offs midweek, miles away from home. There's fuck all like making it easy for the true supporters.
I want to see a club from the lower leagues giving those in the Premier League a battle.
I want to see the glory and the struggles my team faces.
If my club is successful or is relegated, that's part of the game. Take that away, take the supporters away, and the games lost whatever soul its got left.
I know plenty of football supporters. I don't know one who was in favour of the Super League. And whoever thought it up is a cunt.
And breathe.....
Winston
That's quite a forthright and articulate diatribe, sir. Well spoken.
The whole travelling to games here is a nightmare. Lady Astor has a home and away season for her particular torture.
A few weeks ago, away game at Newcastle.
8.30pm kick off.
Tuesday night.
So many hours on the coach the driver has to stop for a 45 minute break on the way home.
They got in at 3am Wednesday morning.
For those hard of thinking telly schedulers, THATS A FUCKING WORK DAY.
Pricks.
Winston
I hear you. The rot started forming in my interest in football when I noticed such fixtures 25 years ago. The Valencia match I mentioned certainly didn't help. There's some decent non league teams near me. I should go support them. "
Football, just like nostalgia, isn't what it used to be. 
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities.
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team
Does it not? Educate me. Yeah fans have been priced out and I feel for them, but how can you support your team if you're not there? Buying merchandise maybe?
Yes merchandise makes up a big part of a teams income, especially at almost 100 quid for a top or 60 odd for the cheaper option. That's a lot of money if you're buying 2 or 3 kits and on a low income. For you to be saying you aren't a proper supporter if don't go to the games you must either live local to your team or have money to burn that you don't need for other things
I do believe in supporting your local team, yeah. Before TV you had to. I think I'm prehistoric tho
So if you move are you going to support a different team then?
There's a shit load of Polish Millwall fans round my way so yeah. I'm sure they follow their home team on the telly too. I'm not criticising you PD, but I am questioning football culture in general. What it has become etc. I used to love football, but I've wondered off now, disinterested and out of touch.
Again, I don't consider myself a proper football fan because I've been to no more than a couple of dozen games in my life. I'd love to go to Anfield and hear them sing You'll Never Walk Alone, but the section I'm in will sing "daytripper" at me and they'd be right.
I've unfortunately only been to one game at Anfield but I'd go to every game if I won the lottery or someone wanted to pay for me to go
It is eye wateringly expensive in this country. Its just England too. I've been to games in Spain and Italy, my mates go to German games all the time. If it works there..."
Crazy expensive in England, they definitely turn a good profit |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities.
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team
Does it not? Educate me. Yeah fans have been priced out and I feel for them, but how can you support your team if you're not there? Buying merchandise maybe?
Yes merchandise makes up a big part of a teams income, especially at almost 100 quid for a top or 60 odd for the cheaper option. That's a lot of money if you're buying 2 or 3 kits and on a low income. For you to be saying you aren't a proper supporter if don't go to the games you must either live local to your team or have money to burn that you don't need for other things
I do believe in supporting your local team, yeah. Before TV you had to. I think I'm prehistoric tho
So if you move are you going to support a different team then?
There's a shit load of Polish Millwall fans round my way so yeah. I'm sure they follow their home team on the telly too. I'm not criticising you PD, but I am questioning football culture in general. What it has become etc. I used to love football, but I've wondered off now, disinterested and out of touch.
Again, I don't consider myself a proper football fan because I've been to no more than a couple of dozen games in my life. I'd love to go to Anfield and hear them sing You'll Never Walk Alone, but the section I'm in will sing "daytripper" at me and they'd be right.
I've unfortunately only been to one game at Anfield but I'd go to every game if I won the lottery or someone wanted to pay for me to go
It is eye wateringly expensive in this country. Its just England too. I've been to games in Spain and Italy, my mates go to German games all the time. If it works there...
Crazy expensive in England, they definitely turn a good profit "
I reckon gate receipts are a drop in the ocean compared to corporate sponsorship money, global merchandising and TV rights. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Stopped my Sky sports and BT sports subscription years ago. Just watch the highlights on BBC or YouTube.
Too many people moaning about TV, money, greed destroying football. But they carry on feeding the TV monster. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Stopped my Sky sports and BT sports subscription years ago. Just watch the highlights on BBC or YouTube.
Too many people moaning about TV, money, greed destroying football. But they carry on feeding the TV monster. "
Costs £20k a year to show it in a small pub.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a Manchester City season card holder, I and the vast majority of other City fans think it is a terrible idea
Whilst I suffer all the racist "dirty oil" "ruining football" jibes plus all the other stuff, what people do not realise and need to wake up to is that the biggest threat to the future of football is American owners, as they are the ones driving this
The next worst thing that can happen is Chelsea are bought by Americans
You're a season ticket holder. A proper supporter. They're polling the kind of people who watch in the pub from far flung cities.
Not everyone can afford to spend hundreds every week to travel or thousands a year for tickets. Just because you can't go it doesn't mean you aren't a proper supporter of your team
Does it not? Educate me. Yeah fans have been priced out and I feel for them, but how can you support your team if you're not there? Buying merchandise maybe?
Yes merchandise makes up a big part of a teams income, especially at almost 100 quid for a top or 60 odd for the cheaper option. That's a lot of money if you're buying 2 or 3 kits and on a low income. For you to be saying you aren't a proper supporter if don't go to the games you must either live local to your team or have money to burn that you don't need for other things
I do believe in supporting your local team, yeah. Before TV you had to. I think I'm prehistoric tho
So if you move are you going to support a different team then?
There's a shit load of Polish Millwall fans round my way so yeah. I'm sure they follow their home team on the telly too. I'm not criticising you PD, but I am questioning football culture in general. What it has become etc. I used to love football, but I've wondered off now, disinterested and out of touch.
Again, I don't consider myself a proper football fan because I've been to no more than a couple of dozen games in my life. I'd love to go to Anfield and hear them sing You'll Never Walk Alone, but the section I'm in will sing "daytripper" at me and they'd be right.
I've unfortunately only been to one game at Anfield but I'd go to every game if I won the lottery or someone wanted to pay for me to go
It is eye wateringly expensive in this country. Its just England too. I've been to games in Spain and Italy, my mates go to German games all the time. If it works there...
Crazy expensive in England, they definitely turn a good profit
I reckon gate receipts are a drop in the ocean compared to corporate sponsorship money, global merchandising and TV rights. "
Definitely but if you add up 50 thousand odd tickets at lets just say 60 quid each then that's a nice income |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I thought the romance of football was dead years ago. When TV companies took part in scheduling the following season's fixtures.
Early this century I saw a fixture which was Bournemouth (could've been Portsmouth, but I think I'm right) v Newcastle on a weds night. I thought "Jesus those away fans are gonna have to take the fat end of two days off work for that". TV doesn't give a fuck about football fans.
Watching last night's game was entertaining. A memorable match, but romantic? Na. "
Us lower league teams have been trekking to far flung away games on a Tuesday or Wednesday night since forever! Nowt to do with TV. Fecking Bournemouth on a Tuesday, 7:45pm kick off |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *os19Man
over a year ago
Edmonton |
As someone who used to go to Man Utd games in London during the 1980’s where all you had to do was que up and pay your money at the turnstiles.These games were always on a Saturday at 3.00 pm where the whole of the football league played at that time and occasionally evening games at 7.45. I would love to go back to those days but I know and accept it is never going to happen.I feel that television and the outrageous salary been paid to players has essentially ruined football and the Super League which collapsed would have been a bad thing from my point of view but obviously a money spinner for television companies and clubs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I thought the romance of football was dead years ago. When TV companies took part in scheduling the following season's fixtures.
Early this century I saw a fixture which was Bournemouth (could've been Portsmouth, but I think I'm right) v Newcastle on a weds night. I thought "Jesus those away fans are gonna have to take the fat end of two days off work for that". TV doesn't give a fuck about football fans.
Watching last night's game was entertaining. A memorable match, but romantic? Na.
Us lower league teams have been trekking to far flung away games on a Tuesday or Wednesday night since forever! Nowt to do with TV. Fecking Bournemouth on a Tuesday, 7:45pm kick off "
Really?! I had no idea! I've always blamed the telly for such fixtures. I presume you mean Div 1 or 2? Championship matches get good coverage now it seems. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As someone who used to go to Man Utd games in London during the 1980’s where all you had to do was que up and pay your money at the turnstiles.These games were always on a Saturday at 3.00 pm where the whole of the football league played at that time and occasionally evening games at 7.45. I would love to go back to those days but I know and accept it is never going to happen.I feel that television and the outrageous salary been paid to players has essentially ruined football and the Super League which collapsed would have been a bad thing from my point of view but obviously a money spinner for television companies and clubs "
I didn't know until today that the Champions League was Silvio Berlisconi's idea. Says a lot. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I thought the romance of football was dead years ago. When TV companies took part in scheduling the following season's fixtures.
Early this century I saw a fixture which was Bournemouth (could've been Portsmouth, but I think I'm right) v Newcastle on a weds night. I thought "Jesus those away fans are gonna have to take the fat end of two days off work for that". TV doesn't give a fuck about football fans.
Watching last night's game was entertaining. A memorable match, but romantic? Na.
Us lower league teams have been trekking to far flung away games on a Tuesday or Wednesday night since forever! Nowt to do with TV. Fecking Bournemouth on a Tuesday, 7:45pm kick off
Really?! I had no idea! I've always blamed the telly for such fixtures. I presume you mean Div 1 or 2? Championship matches get good coverage now it seems."
What would now be called League One and League Two. It was 1st and 2nd Division when I was trekking to away games. We have always and still have frequent midweek fixtures and they can be absolutely anywhere. Carlisle on a freezing Wednesday evening  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
As a season ticket holder of a lower league team that travels 200 miles round trip every other week, I personally think that the Super league is a bad idea, there is already a massive gulf between clubs at the top and the Championship, there is a massive gulf between championship and league 1 and soon there will be one between league 1 and 2 (if not already there). Bringing a super league in will reduce the money filtering down to the lower leagues even further. Without the lower leagues in place you get no new players coming through |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"As a season ticket holder of a lower league team that travels 200 miles round trip every other week, I personally think that the Super league is a bad idea, there is already a massive gulf between clubs at the top and the Championship, there is a massive gulf between championship and league 1 and soon there will be one between league 1 and 2 (if not already there). Bringing a super league in will reduce the money filtering down to the lower leagues even further. Without the lower leagues in place you get no new players coming through"
Utmost respect to anyone on a terrace in the depths of winter cheering on a lower league team potentially having hours long drives after a 0-0 draw. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Utmost respect to anyone on a terrace in the depths of winter cheering on a lower league team potentially having hours long drives after a 0-0 draw. "
Even worse when you have to drive midweek the length of the country only for the officials to mess it up and make the result void so you have to do it all again |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a season ticket holder of a lower league team that travels 200 miles round trip every other week, I personally think that the Super league is a bad idea, there is already a massive gulf between clubs at the top and the Championship, there is a massive gulf between championship and league 1 and soon there will be one between league 1 and 2 (if not already there). Bringing a super league in will reduce the money filtering down to the lower leagues even further. Without the lower leagues in place you get no new players coming through
Utmost respect to anyone on a terrace in the depths of winter cheering on a lower league team potentially having hours long drives after a 0-0 draw. "
Fucking Grimsby Town |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I was an Arsenal season ticket holder for a few seasons, I love going to the football but… I now prefer to watch it at home or the pub. Given the expense of a game now and the time commitment each game cost me around £120 inc travel, beer, food, program etc then I would lose the whole day too.
That cost has nothing to do with tv money… if anything more money into the clubs may (it never will) reduce ticket prices. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I wouldn't have a problem with it provided that all teams involved were thrown out of their national leagues, UEFA and FIFA and any players, managers etc were banned from ever working within the established football scene again and no longer be able to okay for their country. Should any English club need to rejoin then they do so at step 6 and work their way up. It would be a good opportunity for English football to reorganise, a fairer distribution of TV money and hopefully more competitive leagues. I appreciate that's tough for players, genuine fans of the big clubs, etc but the big clubs have to stop holding everyone else to ransom and have their bluff called. It will be their loss in the long run. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Football lost any credibility long ago with teams being used to launder dirty foreign money and owned by repressive regimes that want to 'sports wash' their image , not to mention agents becoming rich by constantly unsettling players to get big money transfer fees . So super league will happen one day so the rich teams get richer and smaller teams will never ever get the chance to enter it . Corrupt sport played by cheating players at the top . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obajxMan
over a year ago
Cheshire |
"Football lost any credibility long ago with teams being used to launder dirty foreign money and owned by repressive regimes that want to 'sports wash' their image."
When you say "launder dirty money" are you talking about the club I support, Manchester City, and if so, please simply explain how it is "laundering" money
Before you do though, there is a second question you can also answer
Sheikh Mansour's money is his own and legitimately earned. Why would he have to launder legitimate cash? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"As a Man United fan from Derby who mostly watches them on TV, the Super League is a dreadful idea. From a football perspective, what gives us the right to be among Europe's elite with how we've been performing the past decade when Leicester have won the league and FA cup more recently?
From a financial perspective, it's a cash grab to make the rich clubs stay rich because they don't have the jeopardy of missing out on Champions League football and missing out on that payout as a result. It allows Real Madrid and Barca and Juve to remain bankrolled so they can continue to dominate their leagues. It's driven by greed and takes away all that is romantic about football.
It’s a cash grab by EUFA"
It wasn’t even a UEFA because these clubs were breaking away from the champions league… I hate the new format coming in 2023/24!
The funny thing is that fans in Spain and Italy were resigned to this happening because TV rights are not shared equally the way it is in the UK…
The thought of relegation scares American owners for the same reason we love it, because there is sometimes as much in staying up as there is in winning |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a Man United fan from Derby who mostly watches them on TV, the Super League is a dreadful idea. From a football perspective, what gives us the right to be among Europe's elite with how we've been performing the past decade when Leicester have won the league and FA cup more recently?
From a financial perspective, it's a cash grab to make the rich clubs stay rich because they don't have the jeopardy of missing out on Champions League football and missing out on that payout as a result. It allows Real Madrid and Barca and Juve to remain bankrolled so they can continue to dominate their leagues. It's driven by greed and takes away all that is romantic about football.
It’s a cash grab by EUFA
It wasn’t even a UEFA because these clubs were breaking away from the champions league… I hate the new format coming in 2023/24!
The funny thing is that fans in Spain and Italy were resigned to this happening because TV rights are not shared equally the way it is in the UK…
The thought of relegation scares American owners for the same reason we love it, because there is sometimes as much in staying up as there is in winning "
Do you mean the proposed wild card places for those ‘big’ clubs who miss out on a CL place due to their league standing. Oh but don’t worry we’ll give you a free pass because of your history. It just makes a joke of the league, why bother fighting for league position if it doesn’t matter to some clubs.
On the Super League dreadful idea and glad the first attempt came to nothing. Long May it last. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ornyguyMan
over a year ago
Hillsborough, NI |
For me, the big clubs playing each other regularly would take away the thrill of seeing the big European clubs play against each other. Those big European ties for me are special because they are not happening all the time. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"For me, the big clubs playing each other regularly would take away the thrill of seeing the big European clubs play against each other. Those big European ties for me are special because they are not happening all the time."
It's pretty much been like that since the introduction of 2nd 3rd 4th place teams, Arsenal/Bayern springs to mind |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just watched the documentary "Kicking Off" on iplayer. The final comment is from the chairman of Palace questioning the research that said "59% of English fans want a super league" he then says "who are they asking?".
They're asking TV fans. The ones who pack the pubs in London at the tail end of the season.The "die hard" Liverpool fans who have never seen the City let alone been to Anfield.
I'm not a proper supporter either, but I don't pretend to be. I think TV ruined football 20 odd years ago. What do actual football supporters think? Are any of you here?"
Isn't the champions league already a version of a super league? ... With play offs at the end to determine the winner?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Personally the thought of a European super League with the same teams playing each other all the time sounded pretty boring.
What I didn't like though, was how uppity the premier League got when they did a very similar thing to the football league in the 1990s and the hypocrisy shown by many. I am aware that relegation and promotion still exists.
But the super League would have also allowed 5 promoted teams each year. Just the 15 permanent wouldn't be removed.
Also would I rather watch those games that having to sit through 6 matches of Young Boys in the champions League group stages, probably.
And sky led the outrage, would they have been so outrage if DAZN hadn't already secured the TV rights?
I'm old school, I'd like an old school European cup. I think the champions League is already watered down with 4 teams qualifying. It's not worth watching til march. And that getting extended and teams are going to be enter on past glories. To try and pacify the super leaguers. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Football lost any credibility long ago with teams being used to launder dirty foreign money and owned by repressive regimes that want to 'sports wash' their image.
When you say "launder dirty money" are you talking about the club I support, Manchester City, and if so, please simply explain how it is "laundering" money
Before you do though, there is a second question you can also answer
Sheikh Mansour's money is his own and legitimately earned. Why would he have to launder legitimate cash?"
Thats like saying the British Royals money is their own and legitimately earned.
Abu Dhabi United Group is supposed to be a Investment group. A Investment group is supposed to make money. Not lose it. So why are they ok with losing money on his plaything..? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The idea behind it all is a solid one. Who wouldn't want to watch the best teams in Europe play each other week in and week out?
But that isn't the game we have. We have separate leagues, in separate countries. We have additional European competitions which are being altered and changed to allow more teams in, which means more revenue.
A Super League would shrink the Premier league competition and result in less broadcast money.
I'm not for it (not that Norwich will be anywhere near it) but I don't see the talk going away anytime soon |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *.D.I.D.A.SMan
over a year ago
London/Essex... ish... Romford to be exact |
I'd like there to be a super league. But on the condition that they wouldn't be allowed to participate in their own domestic competitions anymore. Then all the other teams can carry on like it was the pre Sky or Premier league era. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'd like there to be a super league. But on the condition that they wouldn't be allowed to participate in their own domestic competitions anymore. Then all the other teams can carry on like it was the pre Sky or Premier league era. "
That's the entire premise. Leave the EPL and just play European teams.
With all the big 4 or big 6 gone the broadcast deals would plummet. The money would fall out of the game. The quality would drop.
Why would any team want to be crowned champions knowing full well there were 4 or more teams better than them in the country that they just hadn't played? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *.D.I.D.A.SMan
over a year ago
London/Essex... ish... Romford to be exact |
"I'd like there to be a super league. But on the condition that they wouldn't be allowed to participate in their own domestic competitions anymore. Then all the other teams can carry on like it was the pre Sky or Premier league era.
That's the entire premise. Leave the EPL and just play European teams.
With all the big 4 or big 6 gone the broadcast deals would plummet. The money would fall out of the game. The quality would drop.
Why would any team want to be crowned champions knowing full well there were 4 or more teams better than them in the country that they just hadn't played?"
I believe the super league teams also wanted to compete in the existing domestic competitions as well. So having their cake and eating it. If they all agreed to fuck off entirely I'd be down with that.
The best teams are only consistently the best because of financial doping and the system which exists to preserve the status quo. In time perhaps history will repeat itself. West Ham or Newcastle may become the new dominant forces and become difficult to dislodge.
There may be a battle and the super league will probably recruit the best players. But ask all the other fans of the other clubs if it necessarily matters. The Championship is often seen as one of the most entertaining and competitive leagues which isn't devoid of quality. The skewed finances at the top means players are hoarded and mercenaries sit on their fat contracts even if they don't play, Hazard, Bale etc. Lesser clubs become risk aversive because they can't compete or don't want to face financial suicide.
Money and greed has killed the game. For those at the top of the tree, they're thriving and want to ensure it remains so with the rest just there to play a supporting role. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'd like there to be a super league. But on the condition that they wouldn't be allowed to participate in their own domestic competitions anymore. Then all the other teams can carry on like it was the pre Sky or Premier league era.
That's the entire premise. Leave the EPL and just play European teams.
With all the big 4 or big 6 gone the broadcast deals would plummet. The money would fall out of the game. The quality would drop.
Why would any team want to be crowned champions knowing full well there were 4 or more teams better than them in the country that they just hadn't played?"
That wasn't the premise. The 6 English teams that were going to be in the Super League would still have been playing in the Premier League. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *tephanjMan
over a year ago
Kettering |
I'm a Chelsea fan and these days an armchair one. The idea of a super League is rubbish. I'm sure the idea was an idea by clubs that are almost broke as a way to get money off the rich ones. None of it was about football it was just to make money |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago
carrbrook stalybridge |
"I'd like there to be a super league. But on the condition that they wouldn't be allowed to participate in their own domestic competitions anymore. Then all the other teams can carry on like it was the pre Sky or Premier league era.
That's the entire premise. Leave the EPL and just play European teams.
With all the big 4 or big 6 gone the broadcast deals would plummet. The money would fall out of the game. The quality would drop.
Why would any team want to be crowned champions knowing full well there were 4 or more teams better than them in the country that they just hadn't played?
That wasn't the premise. The 6 English teams that were going to be in the Super League would still have been playing in the Premier League. "
untill the premier league said nope bye bye |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The Madrid game. Was that crowd noise fake? The front rows are were cordoned off. I have been to the Bernabuea (sic) and the Nou Camp and I came away blessed for the English and German leagues. So soulless, the chatting between goals. The Frankfurt and Rangers atmosphere looked terrific. Theres the difference between a super league and competition. How is it a competition when you know the results already, your just waiting for the goals. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *.D.I.D.A.SMan
over a year ago
London/Essex... ish... Romford to be exact |
"The Madrid game. Was that crowd noise fake? The front rows are were cordoned off. I have been to the Bernabuea (sic) and the Nou Camp and I came away blessed for the English and German leagues. So soulless, the chatting between goals. The Frankfurt and Rangers atmosphere looked terrific. Theres the difference between a super league and competition. How is it a competition when you know the results already, your just waiting for the goals. "
Crowd noises are clearly heavily manipulated these days. Undesirable chants and swearing for example. The governing bodies are trying to take the game away from the people. The Bundesliga rejected the Super League idea as they're still heavily geared towards the fan base with 50+1 for example. In the greedy fat cats ideal world, the 'product' would become an event they could just sell globally like WWE or Ufc, playing in Asia, America or Dubai. I guess this is why they're floating the idea of the semi and final of champions league to be staged in a random city over a week and why the Premier league discussed a 39th game overseas years back. The traditional local legacy fan is just seen as a prop these days. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I can't stand football.
I do think football was ruined when TV got hold of it, also adding so many different leagues. I never heard of football clubs going bankrupt when we had divisions 1, 2 and 3. People could watch the games, on World of Sport as well. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'd like there to be a super league. But on the condition that they wouldn't be allowed to participate in their own domestic competitions anymore. Then all the other teams can carry on like it was the pre Sky or Premier league era.
That's the entire premise. Leave the EPL and just play European teams.
With all the big 4 or big 6 gone the broadcast deals would plummet. The money would fall out of the game. The quality would drop.
Why would any team want to be crowned champions knowing full well there were 4 or more teams better than them in the country that they just hadn't played?"
No it wasn't. They wanted to still compete in their domestic leagues. It was to be a new midweek rival/replacement for the champions League.
Just the premier said they'd expell them too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obajxMan
over a year ago
Cheshire |
"Football lost any credibility long ago with teams being used to launder dirty foreign money and owned by repressive regimes that want to 'sports wash' their image.
When you say "launder dirty money" are you talking about the club I support, Manchester City, and if so, please simply explain how it is "laundering" money
Before you do though, there is a second question you can also answer
Sheikh Mansour's money is his own and legitimately earned. Why would he have to launder legitimate cash?
Thats like saying the British Royals money is their own and legitimately earned.
Abu Dhabi United Group is supposed to be a Investment group. A Investment group is supposed to make money. Not lose it. So why are they ok with losing money on his plaything..?"
I'm not a spokesperson for a very rich Arab Sheikh, but your post is typical of the uninformed rubbish that was spouted when Mansour bought Manchester City
Look up City Football Group and then look up Silverlake investment into Manchester City
Mansour has spent around £1.5B on CFG and its infractstructure (Etihad campus as an example)
The 2019 Silverlake investment places the CFG valuation at over £4B, so it's hardly a "play thing"
As for the superleague, Chelsea are seemingly on the verge of an American takeover. As I said earlier in the thread, it's American owners who are the real danger to English football
All of these will be American or majority American owned
Arsenal
Tottenham
Manchester United
Chelsea
Liverpool
Burnley
Aston Villa
Leeds United
Crystal Palace
In any vote regarding rule changes, it takes a majority of 14 clubs
Americans do not understand the concept of promotion and relegation. Five more clubs and they could vote for a closed Premier league!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
