FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Why is abramovich selling chelsea?
Why is abramovich selling chelsea?
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *hagTonight OP Man
over a year ago
From the land of haribos. |
Who else is surprised over the news that he is now selling chelsea? I am and what kind of alternative motives could it be? Could one reason be as he is seeing how heavy sanctions russia is getting? So thinking to himself. I better sell it now so I get some money from it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
His official line is to send money to those affected by the war, but i think your right with the last statement. Cash out quick while he can and have something he can use.
Rumour is Conor McGregor is loking to buy. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think it’s pretty poor he’s being forced to sell but it goes much deeper. Is it his fault Putins doing what he is doing? Nope
Look at all the Russian sportsmen and women being kicked out of their sports because they are Russian and their nations leader is doing what he’s doing.
When Russians speak out against his regime they go missing, people are poisoned etc. Why are they expected to find bravery now when their leaders are at their most aggressive?
How long before Russians are abused in the streets.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"His official line is to send money to those affected by the war, but i think your right with the last statement. Cash out quick while he can and have something he can use.
Rumour is Conor McGregor is loking to buy."
McGregor might have a few hundred million, that's miles away from the 2 billion that Chelsea owe Roman |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"His official line is to send money to those affected by the war, but i think your right with the last statement. Cash out quick while he can and have something he can use.
Rumour is Conor McGregor is loking to buy.
McGregor might have a few hundred million, that's miles away from the 2 billion that Chelsea owe Roman"
He wants 4Bn I read somewhere. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It shows how much financial doping occurs at the top level, and how my lower league team will NEVER get the chance to compete, when he will write off a loan of £1.5 BILLION that he’s given Chelsea. How can those down the ladder ever hope to have anything near a level playing field when sums like that are involved? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I agree that McGregor may not be able to afford it. How much interest has been shown though?
Also BoyofWonder is correct with how Russians have to deal with Putin and his crew. We have 2 incidents in this country to what lengths Putin will go to. I assume the sanction plan is meant to force the Russian people to "clean up their own mess" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I think it’s pretty poor he’s being forced to sell but it goes much deeper. Is it his fault Putins doing what he is doing? Nope
Look at all the Russian sportsmen and women being kicked out of their sports because they are Russian and their nations leader is doing what he’s doing.
When Russians speak out against his regime they go missing, people are poisoned etc. Why are they expected to find bravery now when their leaders are at their most aggressive?
How long before Russians are abused in the streets.."
Did anyone see about those 7-11yr old kids being held by police for laying flowers at the Ukrainian embassy? Xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"His official line is to send money to those affected by the war, but i think your right with the last statement. Cash out quick while he can and have something he can use.
Rumour is Conor McGregor is loking to buy.
McGregor might have a few hundred million, that's miles away from the 2 billion that Chelsea owe Roman"
he said he dont want the money back from loans |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think it’s pretty poor he’s being forced to sell but it goes much deeper. Is it his fault Putins doing what he is doing? Nope
Look at all the Russian sportsmen and women being kicked out of their sports because they are Russian and their nations leader is doing what he’s doing.
When Russians speak out against his regime they go missing, people are poisoned etc. Why are they expected to find bravery now when their leaders are at their most aggressive?
How long before Russians are abused in the streets..
Did anyone see about those 7-11yr old kids being held by police for laying flowers at the Ukrainian embassy? Xx"
Yeah I saw that yesterday!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"His official line is to send money to those affected by the war, but i think your right with the last statement. Cash out quick while he can and have something he can use.
Rumour is Conor McGregor is loking to buy.
McGregor might have a few hundred million, that's miles away from the 2 billion that Chelsea owe Roman"
Mmm hunder roomer mill is he’s broke on his ass |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
He’s trying to build his reputation for a post-Putin era.
He knows he’s massively tainted by his association. He can deny his links til he’s blue in the face, but Putin is godfather to one of his daughters…
He knows sanctions are going to be hard on anyone who made their money with Putin’s help, and he’s trying to make himself look decent. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"As his bank account has been frozen he must need some cash"
He’s not faced any sanctions, he’s not asking for his loans back, and all proceeds (likely hundreds of millions) are going to a proper Charity for victims of the war (he’s using the word War, no-one in Russia is allowed to), I don’t see how we can criticise him just yet, chances are he is donating more money than most governments will to help Ukrainians |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It shows how much financial doping occurs at the top level, and how my lower league team will NEVER get the chance to compete, when he will write off a loan of £1.5 BILLION that he’s given Chelsea. How can those down the ladder ever hope to have anything near a level playing field when sums like that are involved?"
Ask Leicester |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It shows how much financial doping occurs at the top level, and how my lower league team will NEVER get the chance to compete, when he will write off a loan of £1.5 BILLION that he’s given Chelsea. How can those down the ladder ever hope to have anything near a level playing field when sums like that are involved?
Ask Leicester "
The Leicester owned by Thai Billionaires?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It shows how much financial doping occurs at the top level, and how my lower league team will NEVER get the chance to compete, when he will write off a loan of £1.5 BILLION that he’s given Chelsea. How can those down the ladder ever hope to have anything near a level playing field when sums like that are involved?
Ask Leicester
The Leicester owned by Thai Billionaires? "
The year they were bought they finished bottom of the championship. They got invested in. This is how smaller clubs find success, show promise , get invested in. And they haven’t spent anything like what Chelsea did. So yeah, still go ask them
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It shows how much financial doping occurs at the top level, and how my lower league team will NEVER get the chance to compete, when he will write off a loan of £1.5 BILLION that he’s given Chelsea. How can those down the ladder ever hope to have anything near a level playing field when sums like that are involved?
Ask Leicester
The Leicester owned by Thai Billionaires?
The year they were bought they finished bottom of the championship. They got invested in. This is how smaller clubs find success, show promise , get invested in. And they haven’t spent anything like what Chelsea did. So yeah, still go ask them
"
And how do smaller lower league clubs ‘show promise’ .. Leicester got lucky or maybe unlucky being an ex-Premier League side that had underperformed.
Perhaps the pathway to success for lower league sides is to be failed ex Premier League sides? Sunderland for example are a good candidate for investment. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"does anyone actually believe where's hes going to donate the money?..come on get real"
If he knows he’s likely to face sanctions (some of them have in Germany) then he may rather the money go anywhere other than some government coffers |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ornLordMan
over a year ago
Wiltshire and London |
The question I would ask is why he is being allowed to sell Chelsea. His assets in the UK should be at least frozen as part of sanctions against overt Putin supporters - which despite his claims he undoubtedly is - and encouragement for them to put pressure on Putin to moderate his aggression.
But of course we have a government who were bought by Putin supporters, happy to bluster while imposing sanctions that are weak and watery, with notice given so that they can sell off before assets are frozen.
An asset freeze wouldn't be good for Chelsea's employees, but let's turn it round and ask why millions of innocent Russians should suffer from sanctions for something that is not their fault.
And I'm sorry, but the interests of any football club's supporters are neither here nor there; a game of football really isn't a matter of life and death. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The question I would ask is why he is being allowed to sell Chelsea. His assets in the UK should be at least frozen as part of sanctions against overt Putin supporters - which despite his claims he undoubtedly is - and encouragement for them to put pressure on Putin to moderate his aggression.
But of course we have a government who were bought by Putin supporters, happy to bluster while imposing sanctions that are weak and watery, with notice given so that they can sell off before assets are frozen.
An asset freeze wouldn't be good for Chelsea's employees, but let's turn it round and ask why millions of innocent Russians should suffer from sanctions for something that is not their fault.
And I'm sorry, but the interests of any football club's supporters are neither here nor there; a game of football really isn't a matter of life and death."
Damn right.
2022 Tories: soft on crime, soft on the causes of crime |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I think it’s pretty poor he’s being forced to sell but it goes much deeper. Is it his fault Putins doing what he is doing? Nope
Look at all the Russian sportsmen and women being kicked out of their sports because they are Russian and their nations leader is doing what he’s doing.
When Russians speak out against his regime they go missing, people are poisoned etc. Why are they expected to find bravery now when their leaders are at their most aggressive?
How long before Russians are abused in the streets.."
I believe the real reasons that have been discussed in parliament recently is that Abramovich funded Putin's election campaign and he is a very very close friend/supporter of his regime. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Firstly I have not commented on any of the posts in the last week because as a season ticket holder at Chelsea my comments could be seen as biased.
I was called a terrorist cunt yesterday evening at Kenilworth Road as I cheered on my team.
Having first hand experience of living with someone who has beecaught up in a terrorist attack I can assure you I am not. I would like to think I am not a cunt either but that is probably more subjective.
So Chelsea,even more so now than ever before, is the poisoned chalice of the FA. What choice does the man have?
Sanctions and stripping of assets would make any sale a moot point. And with due diligence taking time none of this will happen anytime soon.
So I will go to Burnley on Saturday and no doubt be called something else and I will have to ignore it because there was a Chelsea before Abramovich and there will be a Chelsea after he has gone.
There will maybe just not be all the philanthropic acts that there once was.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Firstly I have not commented on any of the posts in the last week because as a season ticket holder at Chelsea my comments could be seen as biased.
I was called a terrorist cunt yesterday evening at Kenilworth Road as I cheered on my team.
Having first hand experience of living with someone who has beecaught up in a terrorist attack I can assure you I am not. I would like to think I am not a cunt either but that is probably more subjective.
So Chelsea,even more so now than ever before, is the poisoned chalice of the FA. What choice does the man have?
Sanctions and stripping of assets would make any sale a moot point. And with due diligence taking time none of this will happen anytime soon.
So I will go to Burnley on Saturday and no doubt be called something else and I will have to ignore it because there was a Chelsea before Abramovich and there will be a Chelsea after he has gone.
There will maybe just not be all the philanthropic acts that there once was.
"
Sorry this happened to you Lois. Hope you and who you were with are ok.
Also would be pretty rich if Burnley fans were to throw abuse at other fans wouldn’t it  . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Firstly I have not commented on any of the posts in the last week because as a season ticket holder at Chelsea my comments could be seen as biased.
I was called a terrorist cunt yesterday evening at Kenilworth Road as I cheered on my team.
Having first hand experience of living with someone who has beecaught up in a terrorist attack I can assure you I am not. I would like to think I am not a cunt either but that is probably more subjective.
So Chelsea,even more so now than ever before, is the poisoned chalice of the FA. What choice does the man have?
Sanctions and stripping of assets would make any sale a moot point. And with due diligence taking time none of this will happen anytime soon.
So I will go to Burnley on Saturday and no doubt be called something else and I will have to ignore it because there was a Chelsea before Abramovich and there will be a Chelsea after he has gone.
There will maybe just not be all the philanthropic acts that there once was.
"
This ^ is why I hate some footie fans. Can’t separate the fan from the club and it’s or players/owners/managers supposed actions.
Absolutely no need for it !
Hope you are ok Lois xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who else is surprised over the news that he is now selling chelsea? I am and what kind of alternative motives could it be? Could one reason be as he is seeing how heavy sanctions russia is getting? So thinking to himself. I better sell it now so I get some money from it."
The rumour was, he wanted to spare the club the "difficulty" of being Russian owned. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oodmessMan
over a year ago
yumsville |
"Who else is surprised over the news that he is now selling chelsea? I am and what kind of alternative motives could it be? Could one reason be as he is seeing how heavy sanctions russia is getting? So thinking to himself. I better sell it now so I get some money from it.
The rumour was, he wanted to spare the club the "difficulty" of being Russian owned."
If he was sanctioned it'd mean Chelsea.fc.gov.uk
He's getting rid and he'll be moving whatever money he can get for it or Gov think there'll be difficulty running a football club and have given him a tip off. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"John stones is copping it from mps for putting a pic of them both on social when did it become a crime to know russian people
Terry?"
terry sorry derrrr brains lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Firstly I have not commented on any of the posts in the last week because as a season ticket holder at Chelsea my comments could be seen as biased.
I was called a terrorist cunt yesterday evening at Kenilworth Road as I cheered on my team.
Having first hand experience of living with someone who has beecaught up in a terrorist attack I can assure you I am not. I would like to think I am not a cunt either but that is probably more subjective.
So Chelsea,even more so now than ever before, is the poisoned chalice of the FA. What choice does the man have?
Sanctions and stripping of assets would make any sale a moot point. And with due diligence taking time none of this will happen anytime soon.
So I will go to Burnley on Saturday and no doubt be called something else and I will have to ignore it because there was a Chelsea before Abramovich and there will be a Chelsea after he has gone.
There will maybe just not be all the philanthropic acts that there once was.
"
Sorry to hear of the abuse you’ve received
Bloody crazy world we're living in   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
