FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Daddy issues
Daddy issues
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just here to read the replies "Popcorn *holds out bowl | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just here to read the replies
Popcorn *holds out bowl "Steals some popcorn | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just here to read the replies
Popcorn *holds out bowl
Steals some popcorn"Refills the bowl. And brings drinks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
LvM | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just here to read the replies
Popcorn *holds out bowl
Steals some popcorn
Refills the bowl. And brings drinks "Fancy seeing you here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just here to read the replies
Popcorn *holds out bowl
Steals some popcorn" *slaps hand. Manners! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just here to read the replies
Popcorn *holds out bowl
Steals some popcorn
Refills the bowl. And brings drinks " thank you
*gives Drew the side eye | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I don't really get on with my dad. Not seen him in about 20 or so years. Wouldn't say it makes me attracted to older men though. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just here to read the replies
Popcorn *holds out bowl
Steals some popcorn
Refills the bowl. And brings drinks
Fancy seeing you here "We meet in all the right treads | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Stop it OP, you'll give all the other monkeys here a bad name
LvM"All monkeys are bad… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just here to read the replies
Popcorn *holds out bowl
Steals some popcorn
Refills the bowl. And brings drinks
Fancy seeing you here
We meet in all the right treads "I am keeping a low profile shhh | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just here to read the replies
Popcorn *holds out bowl
Steals some popcorn
Refills the bowl. And brings drinks
Fancy seeing you here
We meet in all the right treads
I am keeping a low profile shhh"Me to, I’m just here to take notes for Sydney university. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just here to read the replies
Popcorn *holds out bowl
Steals some popcorn
Refills the bowl. And brings drinks
Fancy seeing you here
We meet in all the right treads
I am keeping a low profile shhh
Me to, I’m just here to take notes for Sydney university. "Brilliant. I mean someone always has to.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm attracted to older men, always have been. Doesn't mean I have "daddy issues" though. "  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"OP you've just alienated all the lovely young ladies on here who like older guys but, don't in any way shape or form have Daddy issues. " You can't alienate a group that doesn't exist. *joking angry people reading this* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm attracted to older men, always have been. Doesn't mean I have "daddy issues" though. "Flirt!  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues?" Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Don’t all shout at once, but a younger woman who wants to meet an older experienced guy would be just the ticket…." The only ticket I want can be found in Wonka bars! Fucking Charlie Bucket, bring back Augustus Gloop, that silly nincompoop! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why is it always blamed on the women by being daddy issues, why isn’t it blamed on the father that gave her the issues…" Because its a male fantasy to have someone with “Daddy issues” and who fantasises about being a twat? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why is it always blamed on the women by being daddy issues, why isn’t it blamed on the father that gave her the issues… Because its a male fantasy to have someone with “Daddy issues” and who fantasises about being a twat?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If wanko puts a rolling eye emoji on a thread then it kind of tells you it’s going to be a bad/funny thread. Best of luck op!!!! T" Wanko.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"OP you've just alienated all the lovely young ladies on here who like older guys but, don't in any way shape or form have Daddy issues. You can't alienate a group that doesn't exist. *joking angry people reading this*"  We need to have words you cheeky wotsit. *joking not joking*  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Don’t all shout at once, but a younger woman who wants to meet an older experienced guy would be just the ticket…." This isn’t turning out quite as you hoped, is it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"... and what about the men, who only ever seek out younger women - what issues do they have - I wonder?! "A desire to fuck someone whos boobs aren’t good friends with their ankles? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Don’t all shout at once, but a younger woman who wants to meet an older experienced guy would be just the ticket…." I don’t understand. Do you have daddy issues ? And you need help on a swingers forum ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"... and what about the men, who only ever seek out younger women - what issues do they have - I wonder?!
A desire to fuck someone whos boobs aren’t good friends with their ankles?"Not all women have boobs, regardless of age... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love. " Ah, it’s simpler than that. He has clearly been watching too much American porn which always seems to be about daddies, stepmoms etc. He is probably suffering from Tissue Issues. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love. " He's literally written one sentence and you can gauge all that? That's a bit much to be even suggesting that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love. He's literally written one sentence and you can gauge all that? That's a bit much to be even suggesting that. " But it is a valid point of what some (not necessarily the OP) would look for in vulnerability, to manipulate a situation or person in such a way. They didn’t necessarily say that is absolutely what the OPs intentions are, but it is however a possibility. It’s all hypothesis, _ased on the question “why do you need to have issues “ rather than a direct conclusion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe the word "daddy" should be removed....we all know how that turns out" To be honest, I thought this was going’s to go along the lines of, the want for older men or a DD dynamic only stems from daddy issues. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe the word "daddy" should be removed....we all know how that turns out" Then what would my wife call me? Dave? Don’t be ludicrous | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m not 100% sure on this, I think he just wants to recreate the things that caused said issues, but at a more experienced level of disappointment ? But you need to take a ticket and wait your turn? " More experienced at abandoning or neglecting children. Gotcha. I was way off. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love. He's literally written one sentence and you can gauge all that? That's a bit much to be even suggesting that. But it is a valid point of what some (not necessarily the OP) would look for in vulnerability, to manipulate a situation or person in such a way. They didn’t necessarily say that is absolutely what the OPs intentions are, but it is however a possibility. It’s all hypothesis, _ased on the question “why do you need to have issues “ rather than a direct conclusion. " It's a lot of hypothesising _ased on very little. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
what are your chances | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love. He's literally written one sentence and you can gauge all that? That's a bit much to be even suggesting that. But it is a valid point of what some (not necessarily the OP) would look for in vulnerability, to manipulate a situation or person in such a way. They didn’t necessarily say that is absolutely what the OPs intentions are, but it is however a possibility. It’s all hypothesis, _ased on the question “why do you need to have issues “ rather than a direct conclusion. " Deep. Of the women I know/known, the ones with daddy issues often seen submissive not dominant men, the ones using the word Daddy to a partner are very secure usually don’t have daddy issues or they’d reuse to use the term. And not all men attracted to vulnerability are weak or manipulative, some just have the capacity to deal with it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"here we go again "El presidente wonko ! Two bierr pot favor ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe the word "daddy" should be removed....we all know how that turns out Then what would my wife call me? Dave? Don’t be ludicrous "It's only ludicrous if your name is Alan | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe he wants to spoil her and treat her nice, to make up for the lack of a father. I had a wonderful dad who we lost way too soon. It's nice to feel protected and loved. " Was about to come and say maybe he's worded it wrong and has the desire to nuture someone. Some people have that desire to care and look after others. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Deep. Of the women I know/known, the ones with daddy issues often seen submissive not dominant men, the ones using the word Daddy to a partner are very secure usually don’t have daddy issues or they’d reuse to use the term. And not all men attracted to vulnerability are weak or manipulative, some just have the capacity to deal with it " I agree, not all will be looking for the same reasons. Motive would be something to look at though. Why look for some one with a vulnerability, Rather than accepting of vulnerability that person may have. This for me would be where I would question motives. Not all will have sinister motive, but there is also those who will. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love. He's literally written one sentence and you can gauge all that? That's a bit much to be even suggesting that. " ... and in the one dented that he ruled he didn’t even mention daddy issues, just saying he’s love to hear from a younger lady who was looking for an older experienced guy. Some of what had been read into this is a bit extreme ... that he is looks for vulnerable people to exploit as taking advantage of, etc. I suspect that the reason that we haven’t heard more from OP is that he is busy dealing with all the young ladies who want to meet him. Or maybe he is having a nap. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Deep. Of the women I know/known, the ones with daddy issues often seen submissive not dominant men, the ones using the word Daddy to a partner are very secure usually don’t have daddy issues or they’d reuse to use the term. And not all men attracted to vulnerability are weak or manipulative, some just have the capacity to deal with it I agree, not all will be looking for the same reasons. Motive would be something to look at though. Why look for some one with a vulnerability, Rather than accepting of vulnerability that person may have. This for me would be where I would question motives. Not all will have sinister motive, but there is also those who will. " Have you read OP’s initial post? Or just the heading? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love. He's literally written one sentence and you can gauge all that? That's a bit much to be even suggesting that. ... and in the one dented that he ruled he didn’t even mention daddy issues, just saying he’s love to hear from a younger lady who was looking for an older experienced guy. Some of what had been read into this is a bit extreme ... that he is looks for vulnerable people to exploit as taking advantage of, etc. I suspect that the reason that we haven’t heard more from OP is that he is busy dealing with all the young ladies who want to meet him. Or maybe he is having a nap. " If I were him I'd have a nap | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Deep. Of the women I know/known, the ones with daddy issues often seen submissive not dominant men, the ones using the word Daddy to a partner are very secure usually don’t have daddy issues or they’d reuse to use the term. And not all men attracted to vulnerability are weak or manipulative, some just have the capacity to deal with it I agree, not all will be looking for the same reasons. Motive would be something to look at though. Why look for some one with a vulnerability, Rather than accepting of vulnerability that person may have. This for me would be where I would question motives. Not all will have sinister motive, but there is also those who will. Have you read OP’s initial post? Or just the heading? " Read both and like many confused as to what the link is between the two. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Deep. Of the women I know/known, the ones with daddy issues often seen submissive not dominant men, the ones using the word Daddy to a partner are very secure usually don’t have daddy issues or they’d reuse to use the term. And not all men attracted to vulnerability are weak or manipulative, some just have the capacity to deal with it I agree, not all will be looking for the same reasons. Motive would be something to look at though. Why look for some one with a vulnerability, Rather than accepting of vulnerability that person may have. This for me would be where I would question motives. Not all will have sinister motive, but there is also those who will. Have you read OP’s initial post? Or just the heading? Read both and like many confused as to what the link is between the two. " I got the impression that he was hoping to have add with a young lady who liked having sex with older men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maybe the word "daddy" should be removed....we all know how that turns out Then what would my wife call me? Dave? Don’t be ludicrous
It's only ludicrous if your name is Alan " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love. "Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man. Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise). But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting. And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men. "But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest. I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “ "I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions. "... and it’s piqued, not peaked | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions. "To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So do young guys that like older women have mummy issues?? I certainly don't think so,so whats the difference??" They are the same as old blokes who are looking for younger women, just blokes who are trying to get laid. But you will be familiar with the term “cougar” ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent . "People need to lighten up a little. Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together. Odd? Yeah. Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah. Fun? Yeah. Would I do it again? No Glad I did it? Yeah. Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent .
People need to lighten up a little.
Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together.
Odd? Yeah.
Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah.
Fun? Yeah.
Would I do it again? No
Glad I did it? Yeah.
Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun. "I’m guessing you haven’t seen the sheer vitriol on the Ddlg threads then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Another op who throws a grenade then buggars off "He could be at....drumroll.... work?!!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Another op who throws a grenade then buggars off "Hence my post | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent .
People need to lighten up a little.
Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together.
Odd? Yeah.
Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah.
Fun? Yeah.
Would I do it again? No
Glad I did it? Yeah.
Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun. "That’s more than a bit odd  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent .
People need to lighten up a little.
Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together.
Odd? Yeah.
Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah.
Fun? Yeah.
Would I do it again? No
Glad I did it? Yeah.
Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun.
That’s more than a bit odd "Just a bit | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Another op who throws a grenade then buggars off
Hence my post "Haven’t seen your thread my dear | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Huge fan of the older lady, but dont have mummy issues, problem is that the older i get, the older lady thing is bordering on necrophilia, question is for me, how old is too old. and go................." Wtf | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent .
People need to lighten up a little.
Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together.
Odd? Yeah.
Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah.
Fun? Yeah.
Would I do it again? No
Glad I did it? Yeah.
Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun.
That’s more than a bit odd "Its not really odd at all if 'son' is just replaced by 'person wishing to give care too' . Its a loving, caring type of thing in my eyes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent .
People need to lighten up a little.
Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together.
Odd? Yeah.
Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah.
Fun? Yeah.
Would I do it again? No
Glad I did it? Yeah.
Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun.
That’s more than a bit odd
Its not really odd at all if 'son' is just replaced by 'person wishing to give care too' . Its a loving, caring type of thing in my eyes. "Wanting younger men to pretend to be her son. Sorry I should have said “to me”‘ that’s odd. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent .
People need to lighten up a little.
Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together.
Odd? Yeah.
Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah.
Fun? Yeah.
Would I do it again? No
Glad I did it? Yeah.
Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun.
That’s more than a bit odd
Its not really odd at all if 'son' is just replaced by 'person wishing to give care too' . Its a loving, caring type of thing in my eyes.
Wanting younger men to pretend to be her son.
Sorry I should have said “to me”‘ that’s odd. "Doesnt really want it to be a son though. (Im sure) Its just words. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent .
People need to lighten up a little.
Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together.
Odd? Yeah.
Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah.
Fun? Yeah.
Would I do it again? No
Glad I did it? Yeah.
Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun.
That’s more than a bit odd
Its not really odd at all if 'son' is just replaced by 'person wishing to give care too' . Its a loving, caring type of thing in my eyes.
Wanting younger men to pretend to be her son.
Sorry I should have said “to me”‘ that’s odd.
Doesnt really want it to be a son though. (Im sure) Its just words. "Ok | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent .
People need to lighten up a little.
Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together.
Odd? Yeah.
Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah.
Fun? Yeah.
Would I do it again? No
Glad I did it? Yeah.
Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun.
That’s more than a bit odd
Its not really odd at all if 'son' is just replaced by 'person wishing to give care too' . Its a loving, caring type of thing in my eyes.
Wanting younger men to pretend to be her son.
Sorry I should have said “to me”‘ that’s odd.
Doesnt really want it to be a son though. (Im sure) Its just words. "Correct. Like I say, it was a bit of fun. An odd experience, but you have to try new things the odd time, she clearly enjoyed it, and I got a kick out of her enjoying herself so much. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent .
People need to lighten up a little.
Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together.
Odd? Yeah.
Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah.
Fun? Yeah.
Would I do it again? No
Glad I did it? Yeah.
Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun.
I’m guessing you haven’t seen the sheer vitriol on the Ddlg threads then?"No, I haven’t. Not a scenario that has ever appealed to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As long as he's handsome "Pretty much sums it up. Tolerance of someone’s naughty kinks is directly proportional to how fuckable/fanciable they are. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent .
People need to lighten up a little.
Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together.
Odd? Yeah.
Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah.
Fun? Yeah.
Would I do it again? No
Glad I did it? Yeah.
Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun.
That’s more than a bit odd
Its not really odd at all if 'son' is just replaced by 'person wishing to give care too' . Its a loving, caring type of thing in my eyes.
Wanting younger men to pretend to be her son.
Sorry I should have said “to me”‘ that’s odd.
Doesnt really want it to be a son though. (Im sure) Its just words.
Correct. Like I say, it was a bit of fun. An odd experience, but you have to try new things the odd time, she clearly enjoyed it, and I got a kick out of her enjoying herself so much. "Still in my eyes the fact she wanted you to pretend to be her son is sick (imo) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent .
People need to lighten up a little.
Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together.
Odd? Yeah.
Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah.
Fun? Yeah.
Would I do it again? No
Glad I did it? Yeah.
Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun.
That’s more than a bit odd
Its not really odd at all if 'son' is just replaced by 'person wishing to give care too' . Its a loving, caring type of thing in my eyes.
Wanting younger men to pretend to be her son.
Sorry I should have said “to me”‘ that’s odd.
Doesnt really want it to be a son though. (Im sure) Its just words.
Correct. Like I say, it was a bit of fun. An odd experience, but you have to try new things the odd time, she clearly enjoyed it, and I got a kick out of her enjoying herself so much.
Still in my eyes the fact she wanted you to pretend to be her son is sick (imo)"Fair enough. But in seeking someone to play the part, was she exploiting someone who was vulnerable? Absolutely not. And that’s the point that I am trying to convey. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. " They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world " And the inability to realise that words can be used with a different context. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world " Thats a bit patronising | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising " What’s a better explanation then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world " Yeah that’ll be what it is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then?" Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind!" But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. " You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own." Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Fuck that, daddy stuff is weird "I'll introduce you to mine...you'd get on like a house on fire | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Fuck that, daddy stuff is weird
I'll introduce you to mine...you'd get on like a house on fire "lol right mammy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Fuck that, daddy stuff is weird
I'll introduce you to mine...you'd get on like a house on fire lol right mammy " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it. "Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon ". My kink is well weird. I kink shame myself!
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
. My kink is well weird. I kink shame myself!
"Me too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
. My kink is well weird. I kink shame myself!
Me too "me three | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Another op who throws a grenade then buggars off
Hence my post
Haven’t seen your thread my dear "1St reply to thus thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do they need to have issues? Just a thought but maybe it is because he believes that women with daddy issues are more vulnerable and more easily emotionally manipulated. I am just guessing but it would appear he is a weak man who is looking for a woman to control and mistreat who won't be able to leave because she sees abuse as love.
Maybe it’s because I lived in the US for a number of years that I am seeing the “daddy” thing differently. Over there the word “daddy” is very much taken to mean an authoritative older man.
Rather confusingly, the phrase “call her daddy” has also emerged, referring to a woman who is authoritative (Google “call her daddy” merchandise).
But it really isn’t about exploiting vulnerable young ladies as some posters seem to be suggesting.
And in this instance it just looks like a bloke who is looking for a young lady who likes older men.
But it’s the “daddy issues” that’s peeked interest.
I can enjoy a DD dynamic and have found older men attractive, none of which stems from “daddy issues “
I think you’re overanalysing the poster’s intentions.
To be fair daddy posts are a touchy subject on here. Often met with negativity and misinformation surrounding dynamics. Which is why it can be met with a bit of skepticism on the intent .
People need to lighten up a little.
Years ago I met a woman on Craigslist (in the old days!) who wanted to meet younger men who would pretend to be her son as she gave them a bath and then went to bed together.
Odd? Yeah.
Nice soapy hot bath, handjob in the bath and blowjob in bed? Yeah.
Fun? Yeah.
Would I do it again? No
Glad I did it? Yeah.
Did I feel that “mummy” was taking advantage of someone who had serious psychological issues? Of course not, it was a bit of fun.
That’s more than a bit odd
Its not really odd at all if 'son' is just replaced by 'person wishing to give care too' . Its a loving, caring type of thing in my eyes.
Wanting younger men to pretend to be her son.
Sorry I should have said “to me”‘ that’s odd.
Doesnt really want it to be a son though. (Im sure) Its just words.
Correct. Like I say, it was a bit of fun. An odd experience, but you have to try new things the odd time, she clearly enjoyed it, and I got a kick out of her enjoying herself so much.
Still in my eyes the fact she wanted you to pretend to be her son is sick (imo)
Fair enough. But in seeking someone to play the part, was she exploiting someone who was vulnerable? Absolutely not.
And that’s the point that I am trying to convey. "Ab so that’s ok to think about it as long as you don’t act on it in real life | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Anyone for cake?" This is far more interesting. What kind of cake do you have? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own." Shooting down in flames happened to the OP, a tendency to gang up happens a lot on the forums as the next poster tries to out do the last. My post about the number of people find things odd is that observation, one person calls it odd and a barrage of odds follow, which I find odd | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You're only 50 though...does the Daddy stuff not usually involve guys older than you? Or am I in denial as I'm 47... "My daddy is 29 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You're only 50 though...does the Daddy stuff not usually involve guys older than you? Or am I in denial as I'm 47...
My daddy is 29"Time travel is real! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"You're only 50 though...does the Daddy stuff not usually involve guys older than you? Or am I in denial as I'm 47...
My daddy is 29
Time travel is real! " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Huh? You want this or you're not a fan? " Wow beautiful | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So do young guys that like older women have mummy issues?? I certainly don't think so,so whats the difference?? They are the same as old blokes who are looking for younger women, just blokes who are trying to get laid. But you will be familiar with the term “cougar” ... " I mostly meet younger men, but I'm not a cougar. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As long as he's handsome
Pretty much sums it up.
Tolerance of someone’s naughty kinks is directly proportional to how fuckable/fanciable they are. "Beautiful people get away with murder on here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon "Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy' It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch"Is cheating a kink?? Not getting the argument. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch"Sometimes daddy's are married. Kinkception. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch"Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)"How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?"Exactly the same! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!"And you judge because you know what? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?"You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it. "you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge. Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words"What exactly is your point? Are you trying to create an argument? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words"If they are meeting and having sex with others behind their wives/gf/husbands/bf back, it's cheating. I don't condone cheating and never will. If they can't be honest with someone they are supposed to love then they are hardly going to be honest with anyone else. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
What exactly is your point? Are you trying to create an argument?"My point is clear. Saying someone who is on this sight without their partners knowledge disgusts them is judgmental. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
What exactly is your point? Are you trying to create an argument?
My point is clear. Saying someone who is on this sight without their partners knowledge disgusts them is judgmental. "No-one is disputing that fact | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
If they are meeting and having sex with others behind their wives/gf/husbands/bf back, it's cheating. I don't condone cheating and never will. If they can't be honest with someone they are supposed to love then they are hardly going to be honest with anyone else."On this site does not mean anyone is doing what you said above, however you have judged that to be the situation. I could be in a partnership and use this site as a social platform, never getting into a sexual relationship. I would even suggest that many accounts here are just that, social.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
If they are meeting and having sex with others behind their wives/gf/husbands/bf back, it's cheating. I don't condone cheating and never will. If they can't be honest with someone they are supposed to love then they are hardly going to be honest with anyone else.
On this site does not mean anyone is doing what you said above, however you have judged that to be the situation. I could be in a partnership and use this site as a social platform, never getting into a sexual relationship. I would even suggest that many accounts here are just that, social.. "I think it's a question of whether their partner might still consider that to be lying. I do know quite a few married men who are here socially - it's true. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
What exactly is your point? Are you trying to create an argument?
My point is clear. Saying someone who is on this sight without their partners knowledge disgusts them is judgmental.
No-one is disputing that fact "Your words "Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)" Did I misunderstand you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
If they are meeting and having sex with others behind their wives/gf/husbands/bf back, it's cheating. I don't condone cheating and never will. If they can't be honest with someone they are supposed to love then they are hardly going to be honest with anyone else.
On this site does not mean anyone is doing what you said above, however you have judged that to be the situation. I could be in a partnership and use this site as a social platform, never getting into a sexual relationship. I would even suggest that many accounts here are just that, social.. ". Where did I say EVERYONE was???? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
What exactly is your point? Are you trying to create an argument?
My point is clear. Saying someone who is on this sight without their partners knowledge disgusts them is judgmental.
No-one is disputing that fact
Your words "Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)"
Did I misunderstand you?"Think you need to re-read. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
What exactly is your point? Are you trying to create an argument?
My point is clear. Saying someone who is on this sight without their partners knowledge disgusts them is judgmental.
No-one is disputing that fact
Your words "Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)"
Did I misunderstand you?"Just for the record, and back on topic, I couldn't care less what others call their sexual partners...personally it's not a word I use or will ever use so its of no consequence to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
If they are meeting and having sex with others behind their wives/gf/husbands/bf back, it's cheating. I don't condone cheating and never will. If they can't be honest with someone they are supposed to love then they are hardly going to be honest with anyone else.
On this site does not mean anyone is doing what you said above, however you have judged that to be the situation. I could be in a partnership and use this site as a social platform, never getting into a sexual relationship. I would even suggest that many accounts here are just that, social..
I think it's a question of whether their partner might still consider that to be lying. I do know quite a few married men who are here socially - it's true. "Judge every person on how you think their partner might think? A person should be able to use a site without being judged as "disgusting". People use this site for different reasons, for some it is their only outlet, others get off on flirting, others will be in it for whatever they can score. They are not all the same | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
If they are meeting and having sex with others behind their wives/gf/husbands/bf back, it's cheating. I don't condone cheating and never will. If they can't be honest with someone they are supposed to love then they are hardly going to be honest with anyone else.
On this site does not mean anyone is doing what you said above, however you have judged that to be the situation. I could be in a partnership and use this site as a social platform, never getting into a sexual relationship. I would even suggest that many accounts here are just that, social..
I think it's a question of whether their partner might still consider that to be lying. I do know quite a few married men who are here socially - it's true.
Judge every person on how you think their partner might think? A person should be able to use a site without being judged as "disgusting". People use this site for different reasons, for some it is their only outlet, others get off on flirting, others will be in it for whatever they can score.
They are not all the same "I think you're deliberately misinterpreting what I'm saying. You're looking for a fight. I'm out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
If they are meeting and having sex with others behind their wives/gf/husbands/bf back, it's cheating. I don't condone cheating and never will. If they can't be honest with someone they are supposed to love then they are hardly going to be honest with anyone else.
On this site does not mean anyone is doing what you said above, however you have judged that to be the situation. I could be in a partnership and use this site as a social platform, never getting into a sexual relationship. I would even suggest that many accounts here are just that, social..
I think it's a question of whether their partner might still consider that to be lying. I do know quite a few married men who are here socially - it's true.
Judge every person on how you think their partner might think? A person should be able to use a site without being judged as "disgusting". People use this site for different reasons, for some it is their only outlet, others get off on flirting, others will be in it for whatever they can score.
They are not all the same "In my judgement...if it involves lying to a partner then yes it's disgusting. The fallout, hurt and damage that lies cause can be lifechanging and soul destroying. Why any decent human being would want to inflict that on someone they love is beyond me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
What exactly is your point? Are you trying to create an argument?
My point is clear. Saying someone who is on this sight without their partners knowledge disgusts them is judgmental.
No-one is disputing that fact
Your words "Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)"
Did I misunderstand you?
Just for the record, and back on topic, I couldn't care less what others call their sexual partners...personally it's not a word I use or will ever use so its of no consequence to me."You do know the words I quoted are yours? I will post them again below here. You are saying you don't judge but below you said men on here without their partners knowledge disgusts you, and when I asked you how you feel about women doing the same, you said you felt the some. You then went onto say they were cheating, you can't judge everyone as the same! People use this site for their own needs, not all the same. Your words "Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
What exactly is your point? Are you trying to create an argument?
My point is clear. Saying someone who is on this sight without their partners knowledge disgusts them is judgmental.
No-one is disputing that fact
Your words "Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)"
Did I misunderstand you?
Just for the record, and back on topic, I couldn't care less what others call their sexual partners...personally it's not a word I use or will ever use so its of no consequence to me.
You do know the words I quoted are yours?
I will post them again below here. You are saying you don't judge but below you said men on here without their partners knowledge disgusts you, and when I asked you how you feel about women doing the same, you said you felt the some. You then went onto say they were cheating, you can't judge everyone as the same! People use this site for their own needs, not all the same.
Your words
"Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)""I also said no-one was disputing that fact! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Never mind, threads almost finished" Thank god | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I find it odd that a swingers forum finds lots of things odd and I think that is at odds with the actual odds of people finding things odd, but they do. They’re an odd lot aren’t they ! Maybe because they are young and / or led a sheltered life in a small village? I’m not sure but that ability to accept people are different and like different things amd not be grossed out, it’s kind of an essential skill. I think it’s the same with racism, sexism , homo phobia etc small minds simply can’t cope with a big world Thats a bit patronising What’s a better explanation then? Just because people don't like or find a dynamic "wrong" for them does not mean they've led a sheltered life or have a simple mind! But we’re supposed to agree with everything and not have our own opinions. We’re not allowed to find anything odd because we are on a swingers site. You are shot down in flames if you dare say anything negative. The kink isn't for me but each to their own. Exactly. I’m sure nobody’s going to think oh I best not do that Nora doesn’t like it.
Steady on you'll be accuse of kink shaming soon
Yeah but you only screech about kink shaming when it suits your kink see....God forbid a bloke says he's here as a married man, hung drawn, quartered. Yet it's ok to have sex with your 'Daddy'
It's the hypocrisy that makes my shit itch
Who's said its OK....I didn't. And as for married men (on here without their partners knowledge, just disgust me)
How do you feel about married women on here, without their partners knowledge?
Exactly the same!
And you judge because you know what?
You asked how I felt...I answered. If you see that as a judgement then so be it.
you judged every man and women who is on this site without their partners knowledge.
Not having a sexual encounter, being on here.. your words
If they are meeting and having sex with others behind their wives/gf/husbands/bf back, it's cheating. I don't condone cheating and never will. If they can't be honest with someone they are supposed to love then they are hardly going to be honest with anyone else.
On this site does not mean anyone is doing what you said above, however you have judged that to be the situation. I could be in a partnership and use this site as a social platform, never getting into a sexual relationship. I would even suggest that many accounts here are just that, social..
I think it's a question of whether their partner might still consider that to be lying. I do know quite a few married men who are here socially - it's true.
Judge every person on how you think their partner might think? A person should be able to use a site without being judged as "disgusting". People use this site for different reasons, for some it is their only outlet, others get off on flirting, others will be in it for whatever they can score.
They are not all the same
I think you're deliberately misinterpreting what I'm saying. You're looking for a fight. I'm out."I have not misunderstood you at all, you jumped in with no understanding of the posts before or are being deliberately confrontational | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Never mind, threads almost finished Thank god " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Never mind, threads almost finished Thank god " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Never mind, threads almost finished Thank god " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
