 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Mummy is not happy. Does this mean he's confessed? If they thought he was innocent the would surely strand by him so to be cut off like this implies they know he's not?
Not like me to speculate I know but I'm intrigued.
Mr |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ucka39Man
over a year ago
Newcastle |
"Mummy is not happy. Does this mean he's confessed? If they thought he was innocent the would surely strand by him so to be cut off like this implies they know he's not?
Not like me to speculate I know but I'm intrigued.
Mr"
It's because it looks embarrassing whilst something is being pursued and wouldn't be fit for purpose if he's found not guilty yes if we no that's impossible but if he was he'd get his royal status back but might end up with another attachment a prison number  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Yes I think he’s slipped down the slippery slope there. Even Harry is doing better than paedophile Andrew right now. Interesting times!
I think it’s more about the crown saving face. His actions or associations to the case could reduce the popularity of the monarchy. I think we should go for a republic anyway. Parasites the lot of them! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes I think he’s slipped down the slippery slope there. Even Harry is doing better than paedophile Andrew right now. Interesting times!
I think it’s more about the crown saving face. His actions or associations to the case could reduce the popularity of the monarchy. I think we should go for a republic anyway. Parasites the lot of them!"
I have no love for the Royals and I’d be perfectly happy with a Republic. But I wouldn’t call somebody a paedophile for having sex with a 17 year old. Creepy, yes, but not that. Unless there’s something I don’t know. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes I think he’s slipped down the slippery slope there. Even Harry is doing better than paedophile Andrew right now. Interesting times!
I think it’s more about the crown saving face. His actions or associations to the case could reduce the popularity of the monarchy. I think we should go for a republic anyway. Parasites the lot of them!
I have no love for the Royals and I’d be perfectly happy with a Republic. But I wouldn’t call somebody a paedophile for having sex with a 17 year old. Creepy, yes, but not that. Unless there’s something I don’t know."
I do think it’s totally different. A 17 year old and an actual child. Even though it’s still a crime it’s not the same. But in the laws eyes it is. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes I think he’s slipped down the slippery slope there. Even Harry is doing better than paedophile Andrew right now. Interesting times!
I think it’s more about the crown saving face. His actions or associations to the case could reduce the popularity of the monarchy. I think we should go for a republic anyway. Parasites the lot of them!
I have no love for the Royals and I’d be perfectly happy with a Republic. But I wouldn’t call somebody a paedophile for having sex with a 17 year old. Creepy, yes, but not that. Unless there’s something I don’t know.
I do think it’s totally different. A 17 year old and an actual child. Even though it’s still a crime it’s not the same. But in the laws eyes it is. "
I do too  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes I think he’s slipped down the slippery slope there. Even Harry is doing better than paedophile Andrew right now. Interesting times!
I think it’s more about the crown saving face. His actions or associations to the case could reduce the popularity of the monarchy. I think we should go for a republic anyway. Parasites the lot of them!
I have no love for the Royals and I’d be perfectly happy with a Republic. But I wouldn’t call somebody a paedophile for having sex with a 17 year old. Creepy, yes, but not that. Unless there’s something I don’t know."
I think its more that she says it was against her will. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes I think he’s slipped down the slippery slope there. Even Harry is doing better than paedophile Andrew right now. Interesting times!
I think it’s more about the crown saving face. His actions or associations to the case could reduce the popularity of the monarchy. I think we should go for a republic anyway. Parasites the lot of them!
I have no love for the Royals and I’d be perfectly happy with a Republic. But I wouldn’t call somebody a paedophile for having sex with a 17 year old. Creepy, yes, but not that. Unless there’s something I don’t know."
The age of consent in the states is 18.
But it's alleged that some of the girls at the parties were under 16.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
But I wouldn’t call somebody a paedophile for having sex with a 17 year old. Creepy, yes, but not that. Unless there’s something I don’t know."
My understanding is that woman in question was trafficked into the UK to be a sexual plaything for a ring of highly connected people. If that is proven to be the case, then its (rhymes with) tape. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ubal1Man
over a year ago
Newry Down |
Andrew will from now on officially have the title:
Persona non grata!
They have irrevocably cut him loose; so much for the Windsor family sticking by their own.
But this move probably adumbrates what is to come in the near future!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"Yes I think he’s slipped down the slippery slope there. Even Harry is doing better than paedophile Andrew right now. Interesting times!
I think it’s more about the crown saving face. His actions or associations to the case could reduce the popularity of the monarchy. I think we should go for a republic anyway. Parasites the lot of them!
I have no love for the Royals and I’d be perfectly happy with a Republic. But I wouldn’t call somebody a paedophile for having sex with a 17 year old. Creepy, yes, but not that. Unless there’s something I don’t know."
There is. What is the Age of Consent over in the States and which states are involved it can vary from 16, 17 and 18 years of age, so that will also make a difference, seeing as New York and Jersey are next door to each other. This would be common knowledge to any American over there.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
What is wrong with the Royals. Don't they have advisors to tell them what's what and don't Special Branch and the security services monitor who they are mixing with with?
I find it hard to believe that MI5 & MI6 had no idea who Randy Andy was partying with.
Jimmy Saville, Epstein and cohorts, who else did he get involved with? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I do think perhaps he got caught up in it and at the time didn’t consider the consequences it may have in the future.
I’ve watched the documentary…… a lot of people got caught up in Eppstein and Maxwells web |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ucka39Man
over a year ago
Newcastle |
"Yes I think he’s slipped down the slippery slope there. Even Harry is doing better than paedophile Andrew right now. Interesting times!
I think it’s more about the crown saving face. His actions or associations to the case could reduce the popularity of the monarchy. I think we should go for a republic anyway. Parasites the lot of them!
I have no love for the Royals and I’d be perfectly happy with a Republic. But I wouldn’t call somebody a paedophile for having sex with a 17 year old. Creepy, yes, but not that. Unless there’s something I don’t know.
The age of consent in the states is 18.
But it's alleged that some of the girls at the parties were under 16.
"
Not in all the states |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What is wrong with the Royals. Don't they have advisors to tell them what's what and don't Special Branch and the security services monitor who they are mixing with with?
I find it hard to believe that MI5 & MI6 had no idea who Randy Andy was partying with.
Jimmy Saville, Epstein and cohorts, who else did he get involved with?"
Boris Johnson has advisors and special branch security yet he still does what he wants? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"What is wrong with the Royals. Don't they have advisors to tell them what's what and don't Special Branch and the security services monitor who they are mixing with with?
I find it hard to believe that MI5 & MI6 had no idea who Randy Andy was partying with.
Jimmy Saville, Epstein and cohorts, who else did he get involved with? Boris Johnson has advisors and special branch security yet he still does what he wants? "
You know that voice in your head that says "this is wrong and I shouldn't do this"? This voice gets quieter when alcohol is involved. Boris doesn't have that voice.
We call that voice common sense.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
