FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Did the Three wise men really bring Frankenstein for Jesus
Did the Three wise men really bring Frankenstein for Jesus
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *ryan... OP Man
over a year ago
1950's Original |
Not very wise .
Probably scare the little mite
Some nice warm booties might have been better .
And Myrhh..a drug..what were they thinking..
ps.although I'm called Bryan, I am Not the true Messiah... honestly  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ryan... OP Man
over a year ago
1950's Original |
"I watched a programme a few years ago that was all to do with tracking the stars and constellations over Bethlehem and it appears that baby Jebus was probably born around the end of October. We all know the early Christian’s assimilated our winter solstice into their religious festivals 
Anyway back to the fun thread   "
Could make sense..if born before October 20th.
Ghandi .. preaching peace.
J.Lennon..preaching peace.
Jesus.H.Christ.preaching peace..
.All Librans..( peace maker zodiac sign trait)...
Also doubt he was born December anyway..."while shepherds watch their flocks by night" only possible in December if they had night vision goggles..which I'm fairly sure wasn't invented until Henry VIII time ..if not a tad later .
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No because Jesus doesn't exist. Neither do the other puppets of religion"
Lol yes he did
"Virtually all scholars accept that Jesus existed in a non-supernatural form, and attempts to deny his historicity have been consistently rejected by the scholarly consensus as a fringe theory"
He may not of been the "son of god" as claimed but there is evidence he certainly existed as a man |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ryan... OP Man
over a year ago
1950's Original |
"No because Jesus doesn't exist. Neither do the other puppets of religion
Lol yes he did
"Virtually all scholars accept that Jesus existed in a non-supernatural form, and attempts to deny his historicity have been consistently rejected by the scholarly consensus as a fringe theory"
He may not of been the "son of god" as claimed but there is evidence he certainly existed as a man "
I'd say the biggest evidence for Jesus (Joshua)being an actual person,not a myth, was in a Roman tax collectors document,who mentioned him with a view to seeking him and his followers out...Roman tax collectors were not followers of him
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No because Jesus doesn't exist. Neither do the other puppets of religion
Lol yes he did
"Virtually all scholars accept that Jesus existed in a non-supernatural form, and attempts to deny his historicity have been consistently rejected by the scholarly consensus as a fringe theory"
He may not of been the "son of god" as claimed but there is evidence he certainly existed as a man "
Well I meant more the son of God bit but the point is still there |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No because Jesus doesn't exist. Neither do the other puppets of religion
Lol yes he did
"Virtually all scholars accept that Jesus existed in a non-supernatural form, and attempts to deny his historicity have been consistently rejected by the scholarly consensus as a fringe theory"
He may not of been the "son of god" as claimed but there is evidence he certainly existed as a man
Well I meant more the son of God bit but the point is still there "
I think he was the David Blain of his day, he had a few tricks up his sleeve that no one had seen before and claimed to be “miracles”, probably didn’t take much to impress the meek 2021 years ago |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ryan... OP Man
over a year ago
1950's Original |
"No because Jesus doesn't exist. Neither do the other puppets of religion
Lol yes he did
"Virtually all scholars accept that Jesus existed in a non-supernatural form, and attempts to deny his historicity have been consistently rejected by the scholarly consensus as a fringe theory"
He may not of been the "son of god" as claimed but there is evidence he certainly existed as a man
Well I meant more the son of God bit but the point is still there "
All people are children of God... except Blonde people,they're children of the corn..  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
. 
blooming hope not, that’s not a fun gift at all, was he even around back then? 
