FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Replying to single guys.
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. " Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I hope this isn’t going to turn into a pile-on for single men? Some single men (and some couples for that matter) don’t read profiles and message regardless. I’ve learnt after a few months here to be VERY clear in my profile what I’m looking for. And what I’m not after and thus won’t reply to certain messages. I still get them of course, but I feel a lot better about not replying. It’s just the numbers. Lots of single men are absolutely fine and respectful. " We are sure it will just be the truth, not a pile-on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I hope this isn’t going to turn into a pile-on for single men? Some single men (and some couples for that matter) don’t read profiles and message regardless. I’ve learnt after a few months here to be VERY clear in my profile what I’m looking for. And what I’m not after and thus won’t reply to certain messages. I still get them of course, but I feel a lot better about not replying. It’s just the numbers. Lots of single men are absolutely fine and respectful. We are sure it will just be the truth, not a pile-on." And yet you’ve just said “are they all stupid?” - that seems unnecessarily combative. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? " Any need for that first line ? It is an assumption yes, rightly or wrongly, but you opened the line of communication by responding to a wink. If they are not what you are looking for why would you do that ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? Any need for that first line ? It is an assumption yes, rightly or wrongly, but you opened the line of communication by responding to a wink. If they are not what you are looking for why would you do that ? " Why would they wink? We don't like winks or single men. We can only assume they are stupid. Or are they simply rude and arrogant thinking they can ignore what we say? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? Any need for that first line ? It is an assumption yes, rightly or wrongly, but you opened the line of communication by responding to a wink. If they are not what you are looking for why would you do that ? Why would they wink? We don't like winks or single men. We can only assume they are stupid. Or are they simply rude and arrogant thinking they can ignore what we say?" Are they really doing any harm in sending a wink ? If you don’t like winks then why do you look and respond to them ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s seems that in this case, that if you find yourself getting bent out of shape because of it, just block the men. Problem has now gone away. " Ah but that would be too easy much easier to come on here and give out about men than use the tools provided by the site that help your fab journey. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s seems that in this case, that if you find yourself getting bent out of shape because of it, just block the men. Problem has now gone away. " If they are getting this bent out of shape over receiving an internet wink on an anonymous sex site where they display naked pictures of themselves then I don’t think the problem is that simple to fix. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? Any need for that first line ? It is an assumption yes, rightly or wrongly, but you opened the line of communication by responding to a wink. If they are not what you are looking for why would you do that ? Why would they wink? We don't like winks or single men. We can only assume they are stupid. Or are they simply rude and arrogant thinking they can ignore what we say?" Not going to lie, these comments regarding men being stupid are just downright nasty and uncalled for. If you don’t like winks or single men messaging you, just put your filters up so none of us can message you, there’s a very simple solution to the problem. You can’t fault a man for replying to a message that you sent first off the back his wink. If you block us, then not only can we not message but cannot send winks either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We respect everyone's opinions. Of course, we are also entitiled to ours. Are manners too much to ask for on this site?? Maybe it is. " Manners as in calling half the site stupid? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not sure why you’d reply to a wink…If we winked someone and they then sent a message of thanks, we’d see it as an invitation that there is some interest there. Ignore winks from people you aren’t interested in and block single guys - saves you all the hassle. K " So saying thanks is an expression of interest? We were just thinking it was being polite. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? Any need for that first line ? It is an assumption yes, rightly or wrongly, but you opened the line of communication by responding to a wink. If they are not what you are looking for why would you do that ? Why would they wink? We don't like winks or single men. We can only assume they are stupid. Or are they simply rude and arrogant thinking they can ignore what we say?" I’ve been here ten years. I very rarely send a message to anyone (half a dozen a year, if that). I always aim to read the profile fully, and only message if I get a strong feeling it will go down well. Even then, there’s been occasions when l’ve sent something and gone “oh, bugger, I forget they said A, B or C”. It happens - probably because we all rush around far too fast these days and are Fabbing on our short breaks at work to relieve stress . I totally get single guys can be a pain - I have friends who’ve shown me the messages. I don’t think it rudeness or arrogance often, more being swept away by the wonders of Fab that are tantalisingly out of reach. More excitement and not thinking clearly and slowly, I guess. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We respect everyone's opinions. Of course, we are also entitiled to ours. Are manners too much to ask for on this site?? Maybe it is. Manners as in calling half the site stupid?" Yeah but don't ya know.. manners don't apply to single guys. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We ended up having to block single guys… which is really sad because there are lots that are lovely and we’d like to chat to… but it got overwhelming and some can be quite rude and nasty… " Shame, your pics are amazing.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not sure why you’d reply to a wink…If we winked someone and they then sent a message of thanks, we’d see it as an invitation that there is some interest there. Ignore winks from people you aren’t interested in and block single guys - saves you all the hassle. K So saying thanks is an expression of interest? We were just thinking it was being polite." It’s a response. A wink is an expression of interest - you responded and not in a negative way. So you’ve invited further contact. If someone winked you in a pub and you didn’t fancy them would you go over and thank them? No, same rules apply here. K | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not sure why you’d reply to a wink…If we winked someone and they then sent a message of thanks, we’d see it as an invitation that there is some interest there. Ignore winks from people you aren’t interested in and block single guys - saves you all the hassle. K So saying thanks is an expression of interest? We were just thinking it was being polite. It’s a response. A wink is an expression of interest - you responded and not in a negative way. So you’ve invited further contact. If someone winked you in a pub and you didn’t fancy them would you go over and thank them? No, same rules apply here. K" I think a lot of the problems on this site (and probably life in general) is that we all have slightly different ideas about what certain behaviors and even words mean. If we all took the time to think about why someone is behaving differently to how we feel they should and tried to understand that they my see what we have said and done in a different way to what we intended then there would likely be less annoyance at others. Mr | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd suggest messaging someone who winks when you're not interested is sending mixed signals" I have to agree with this If you aren't interested in meeting the winker, ignore them. If you message they think they are in with a chance, and then because you have mailed them they can now bypass the no single male message filter in the future. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A lot of heated threads this morning. There a shortage of wheetabix or something? " no but there is a shortage of Walker’s crisps! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The site provides the options to block single men from contacting. Much easier to ignore a wink than to message and send out mixed signals." This is a thing. Why would a thank you send mixed signals? Our profile sends any clear signals anyone needs. We had a really nice guy compliment our photo, and accepted our thanks for just what it was. We apologise. Not all men are stupid and rude. Just a lot of them. The guy five minutes ago is why we leave channels open to chat. Why can't everyone show the same manners? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Maybe you should put what you don't want, at the top of your profile or even put "No Single Men" in your title. It will be the first thing they'll see. Then you might not get so many messages from them. Just a suggestion OP x" I have single men only... Still get messages from married and attached men... lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The site provides the options to block single men from contacting. Much easier to ignore a wink than to message and send out mixed signals. This is a thing. Why would a thank you send mixed signals? Our profile sends any clear signals anyone needs. We had a really nice guy compliment our photo, and accepted our thanks for just what it was. We apologise. Not all men are stupid and rude. Just a lot of them. The guy five minutes ago is why we leave channels open to chat. Why can't everyone show the same manners?" I've actually found the majority of men are polite and respectful on here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The site provides the options to block single men from contacting. Much easier to ignore a wink than to message and send out mixed signals. This is a thing. Why would a thank you send mixed signals? Our profile sends any clear signals anyone needs. We had a really nice guy compliment our photo, and accepted our thanks for just what it was. We apologise. Not all men are stupid and rude. Just a lot of them. The guy five minutes ago is why we leave channels open to chat. Why can't everyone show the same manners? I've actually found the majority of men are polite and respectful on here. " Agree with this, the majority that message me and I turn them down are often polite afterwards. Even the straight ones who haven’t read my profile either. I don’t respond to winks from people I’m not interested in meeting, if I did, I’d expect they would think I was interested in them. Thanks from a well crafted message then I’d understand, but from a wink, why bother ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The site provides the options to block single men from contacting. Much easier to ignore a wink than to message and send out mixed signals. This is a thing. Why would a thank you send mixed signals? Our profile sends any clear signals anyone needs. We had a really nice guy compliment our photo, and accepted our thanks for just what it was. We apologise. Not all men are stupid and rude. Just a lot of them. The guy five minutes ago is why we leave channels open to chat. Why can't everyone show the same manners?" A quote from Beyond Purity a few replies above. “It’s a response. A wink is an expression of interest - you responded and not in a negative way. So you’ve invited further contact.” It would have been different in my opinion if you had thanked him and told him that you weren’t interested. Regardless of what it says on your profile, you’ve messaged him off a wink and left it open. I’m just playing devils advocate but he doesn’t know if he’s an exception. He could have read your profile and chanced it or he might not have. I think the mixed signal is that you have sent a message to someone that you have no interest in. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Perhaps we should have checkboxes with warnings/advice, before messages may be sent. You'd have to agree to the profile terms and conditions, including penalties before sending. " There are warnings. If I try to send a message to someone who doesn’t want to meet women there’s a large warning. If you try to send a message to someone who hasn’t replied t your first message - also a warning. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not sure why you’d reply to a wink…If we winked someone and they then sent a message of thanks, we’d see it as an invitation that there is some interest there. Ignore winks from people you aren’t interested in and block single guys - saves you all the hassle. K So saying thanks is an expression of interest? We were just thinking it was being polite. It’s a response. A wink is an expression of interest - you responded and not in a negative way. So you’ve invited further contact. If someone winked you in a pub and you didn’t fancy them would you go over and thank them? No, same rules apply here. K I think a lot of the problems on this site (and probably life in general) is that we all have slightly different ideas about what certain behaviors and even words mean. If we all took the time to think about why someone is behaving differently to how we feel they should and tried to understand that they my see what we have said and done in a different way to what we intended then there would likely be less annoyance at others. Mr" Absolutely I had a major moment with this years after joining. I Fab quite a lot of photos - I do photography, so it’s partly that, but also just if they are a turn on. To me it meant “that’s a photo I like”, nothing more. Years later, I realised that some people saw it as another way of registering interest, and were sometimes not happy about that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I was having a similar conversation yesterday. It’s very easy to become disillusioned with those that ignore profiles and are chancing things. It’s the ones that you don’t hear from, the respectful ones that read, that follow preferences and accept distance or wants. The ones that you don’t hear from are ‘the good ones’. It’s easy to dismiss guys as pestering and annoying but it’s in the silence that the music is found" Can someone suck this guys dick please. Well said. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would you even message someone to say thanks for sending you a wink? A wink is to gauge interest without the person having to send a message. By messaging them you’re suggesting that you want to start a conversation. If I was the dude that winked I’d say why you fucking messaging me then if you don’t want to start some sort of convo. " If you were the gent winking us we could politely ask can't you fucking read?? Our profile clearly says no winks. If a single guys wants to just say hi, then no worries. But just read the fucking profile and respect it. We felt the need to reply at the swearing level that the comment was made!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Maybe you should put what you don't want, at the top of your profile or even put "No Single Men" in your title. It will be the first thing they'll see. Then you might not get so many messages from them. Just a suggestion OP x I have single men only... Still get messages from married and attached men... lol" Chancers! Lol x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We always see posts on here from single guys asking why they don't get replies. Yesterday we had a guy wink us. We said thanks. He said he wanted to know if there was any chance of meeting. We have a clear profile. Very clear. We were simply being polite and replying for a change. For the life of us we cannot figure out how being polite becomes 'We will change our choices just for you" We were asked where we are as he regularly comes by the Midlands and would love to meet up. Why? We clearly say no single guys. The guy, you know who you are. But there are LOADS like you. And guys wonder why couples don't reply?? You really don't know?? Do lots of other people get this shit???" It is quite common lol First line of our profile is constantly ignored or not read. Either way we just delete. Not going to waste our time by replying | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would you even message someone to say thanks for sending you a wink? A wink is to gauge interest without the person having to send a message. By messaging them you’re suggesting that you want to start a conversation. If I was the dude that winked I’d say why you fucking messaging me then if you don’t want to start some sort of convo. If you were the gent winking us we could politely ask can't you fucking read?? Our profile clearly says no winks. If a single guys wants to just say hi, then no worries. But just read the fucking profile and respect it. We felt the need to reply at the swearing level that the comment was made!!" You said you don't like single men, they are all stupid. No sorry, "not all but a lot are" but it is okay for them to message hi. You said you don't want winks, no winks! Yet you replied to one. What has got your back up, is it because you didn't follow your own guidelines? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would you even message someone to say thanks for sending you a wink? A wink is to gauge interest without the person having to send a message. By messaging them you’re suggesting that you want to start a conversation. If I was the dude that winked I’d say why you fucking messaging me then if you don’t want to start some sort of convo. " Hear hear | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would you even message someone to say thanks for sending you a wink? A wink is to gauge interest without the person having to send a message. By messaging them you’re suggesting that you want to start a conversation. If I was the dude that winked I’d say why you fucking messaging me then if you don’t want to start some sort of convo. If you were the gent winking us we could politely ask can't you fucking read?? Our profile clearly says no winks. If a single guys wants to just say hi, then no worries. But just read the fucking profile and respect it. We felt the need to reply at the swearing level that the comment was made!! You said you don't like single men, they are all stupid. No sorry, "not all but a lot are" but it is okay for them to message hi. You said you don't want winks, no winks! Yet you replied to one. What has got your back up, is it because you didn't follow your own guidelines? " Strange. We don't like winks, we don't send them. Where do we not follow our own guidelines? Are you half asleep?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would you even message someone to say thanks for sending you a wink? A wink is to gauge interest without the person having to send a message. By messaging them you’re suggesting that you want to start a conversation. If I was the dude that winked I’d say why you fucking messaging me then if you don’t want to start some sort of convo. If you were the gent winking us we could politely ask can't you fucking read?? Our profile clearly says no winks. If a single guys wants to just say hi, then no worries. But just read the fucking profile and respect it. We felt the need to reply at the swearing level that the comment was made!! You said you don't like single men, they are all stupid. No sorry, "not all but a lot are" but it is okay for them to message hi. You said you don't want winks, no winks! Yet you replied to one. What has got your back up, is it because you didn't follow your own guidelines? Strange. We don't like winks, we don't send them. Where do we not follow our own guidelines? Are you half asleep??" It seems you are the one that might be half asleep... Your original message states that you received a wink from single guy, you sent a reply to single guy. You don't like his reply and you need to let the world know you don't like it, even though you did everything you say you don't want or like. If I was the guy that messaged you and I read this, I would be thanking my lucky stars nothing came of that message. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would you even message someone to say thanks for sending you a wink? A wink is to gauge interest without the person having to send a message. By messaging them you’re suggesting that you want to start a conversation. If I was the dude that winked I’d say why you fucking messaging me then if you don’t want to start some sort of convo. If you were the gent winking us we could politely ask can't you fucking read?? Our profile clearly says no winks. If a single guys wants to just say hi, then no worries. But just read the fucking profile and respect it. We felt the need to reply at the swearing level that the comment was made!!" My comment still stands. Just seems to me like you wanted everyone to say yeah all single men are stupid but refuse to acknowledge that you sending a message to him was what prompted him to message you. As far as he was concerned he was done after sending the wink. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would you even message someone to say thanks for sending you a wink? A wink is to gauge interest without the person having to send a message. By messaging them you’re suggesting that you want to start a conversation. If I was the dude that winked I’d say why you fucking messaging me then if you don’t want to start some sort of convo. If you were the gent winking us we could politely ask can't you fucking read?? Our profile clearly says no winks. If a single guys wants to just say hi, then no worries. But just read the fucking profile and respect it. We felt the need to reply at the swearing level that the comment was made!! You said you don't like single men, they are all stupid. No sorry, "not all but a lot are" but it is okay for them to message hi. You said you don't want winks, no winks! Yet you replied to one. What has got your back up, is it because you didn't follow your own guidelines? Strange. We don't like winks, we don't send them. Where do we not follow our own guidelines? Are you half asleep?? It seems you are the one that might be half asleep... Your original message states that you received a wink from single guy, you sent a reply to single guy. You don't like his reply and you need to let the world know you don't like it, even though you did everything you say you don't want or like. If I was the guy that messaged you and I read this, I would be thanking my lucky stars nothing came of that message. " That's great. Thank your lucky stars all you want. But it doesn’t take away from the original fact. Respect our profile. Honestly? We don't give a shit what single guys think of us. Read the profile. Common manners. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would you even message someone to say thanks for sending you a wink? A wink is to gauge interest without the person having to send a message. By messaging them you’re suggesting that you want to start a conversation. If I was the dude that winked I’d say why you fucking messaging me then if you don’t want to start some sort of convo. If you were the gent winking us we could politely ask can't you fucking read?? Our profile clearly says no winks. If a single guys wants to just say hi, then no worries. But just read the fucking profile and respect it. We felt the need to reply at the swearing level that the comment was made!! My comment still stands. Just seems to me like you wanted everyone to say yeah all single men are stupid but refuse to acknowledge that you sending a message to him was what prompted him to message you. As far as he was concerned he was done after sending the wink. " But we politely and clearly ask that people don't send winks. Why not respect that? Or doesn't manners and respect mean anything on here?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To be fair to the guy if you sent him a message on the back of a wink I can understand why he’d think you might have changed your mind about single guys. A lot of profiles say they don’t meet single guys but then have strings of verifications from single men. Maybe avoid future hassle by not reacting to winks or friend requests of single men. " We think that you are obviously right. As we originally said, single men moan when they get ignored, yet any faint comment makes them think they have a chance of free sex. Fuck them. We will join the ignorant crew. Ignore them. Then they moan that no one replies. .... Sad. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OP: Am I being unreasonable? Everyone: Yes OP: You’re all wrong.... " Everyone? Does that mean that the people who actually have agreed with us don't count?? Expecting manners and respect are wrong now?? Crazy world hey! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would you even message someone to say thanks for sending you a wink? A wink is to gauge interest without the person having to send a message. By messaging them you’re suggesting that you want to start a conversation. If I was the dude that winked I’d say why you fucking messaging me then if you don’t want to start some sort of convo. If you were the gent winking us we could politely ask can't you fucking read?? Our profile clearly says no winks. If a single guys wants to just say hi, then no worries. But just read the fucking profile and respect it. We felt the need to reply at the swearing level that the comment was made!! You said you don't like single men, they are all stupid. No sorry, "not all but a lot are" but it is okay for them to message hi. You said you don't want winks, no winks! Yet you replied to one. What has got your back up, is it because you didn't follow your own guidelines? Strange. We don't like winks, we don't send them. Where do we not follow our own guidelines? Are you half asleep?? It seems you are the one that might be half asleep... Your original message states that you received a wink from single guy, you sent a reply to single guy. You don't like his reply and you need to let the world know you don't like it, even though you did everything you say you don't want or like. If I was the guy that messaged you and I read this, I would be thanking my lucky stars nothing came of that message. That's great. Thank your lucky stars all you want. But it doesn’t take away from the original fact. Respect our profile. Honestly? We don't give a shit what single guys think of us. Read the profile. Common manners." the original fact is you responded to a wink from a single guy with a message, all of which you dislike. You might not care what single guys think of you, but when you put your mixed messages out on a forum with anger, it is not just single guys that are forming an opinion of you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could it be that the man in question sent a wink and then read your profile? Thought shit better not disturb them cos they don’t want single men, I’m not gonna hear anything back because they specifically don’t want single men. But then you message him, he thinks oh maybe I’m an exception to their rule otherwise why would they take the time to message me when their profile specifically states they don’t want single men. " Could possibly be Annie. But good manners would be to read the profile first. Or would it?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could it be that the man in question sent a wink and then read your profile? Thought shit better not disturb them cos they don’t want single men, I’m not gonna hear anything back because they specifically don’t want single men. But then you message him, he thinks oh maybe I’m an exception to their rule otherwise why would they take the time to message me when their profile specifically states they don’t want single men. Could possibly be Annie. But good manners would be to read the profile first. Or would it??" Have a quick skim of my profile text and see if it implies in any way that I’m looking to meet or chat to anyone. Doesn’t stop the messages though but I do just ignore everyone apart from one or two super handsome guys that I explain I may want to meet them after Xmas is over. I have exceptions even to my own rules. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would you even message someone to say thanks for sending you a wink? A wink is to gauge interest without the person having to send a message. By messaging them you’re suggesting that you want to start a conversation. If I was the dude that winked I’d say why you fucking messaging me then if you don’t want to start some sort of convo. If you were the gent winking us we could politely ask can't you fucking read?? Our profile clearly says no winks. If a single guys wants to just say hi, then no worries. But just read the fucking profile and respect it. We felt the need to reply at the swearing level that the comment was made!! You said you don't like single men, they are all stupid. No sorry, "not all but a lot are" but it is okay for them to message hi. You said you don't want winks, no winks! Yet you replied to one. What has got your back up, is it because you didn't follow your own guidelines? Strange. We don't like winks, we don't send them. Where do we not follow our own guidelines? Are you half asleep?? It seems you are the one that might be half asleep... Your original message states that you received a wink from single guy, you sent a reply to single guy. You don't like his reply and you need to let the world know you don't like it, even though you did everything you say you don't want or like. If I was the guy that messaged you and I read this, I would be thanking my lucky stars nothing came of that message. That's great. Thank your lucky stars all you want. But it doesn’t take away from the original fact. Respect our profile. Honestly? We don't give a shit what single guys think of us. Read the profile. Common manners. the original fact is you responded to a wink from a single guy with a message, all of which you dislike. You might not care what single guys think of you, but when you put your mixed messages out on a forum with anger, it is not just single guys that are forming an opinion of you. " This is not in anger? But honestly? ? If people form an opinion of us because we ask for good behaviour then we would rather they didn't bother us anyone. Funny thing though, loads have agreed in private. So now we have more likeminded friends with likeminded manners. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could it be that the man in question sent a wink and then read your profile? Thought shit better not disturb them cos they don’t want single men, I’m not gonna hear anything back because they specifically don’t want single men. But then you message him, he thinks oh maybe I’m an exception to their rule otherwise why would they take the time to message me when their profile specifically states they don’t want single men. Could possibly be Annie. But good manners would be to read the profile first. Or would it??" Reading a profile is polite. Responding to a message is polite. He couldn't win. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could it be that the man in question sent a wink and then read your profile? Thought shit better not disturb them cos they don’t want single men, I’m not gonna hear anything back because they specifically don’t want single men. But then you message him, he thinks oh maybe I’m an exception to their rule otherwise why would they take the time to message me when their profile specifically states they don’t want single men. Could possibly be Annie. But good manners would be to read the profile first. Or would it?? Reading a profile is polite. Responding to a message is polite. He couldn't win. " Round in circles. Reading a profile is polite. Respecting the clear choices in that same profile is good manners. There wasn't anything to win. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would you even message someone to say thanks for sending you a wink? A wink is to gauge interest without the person having to send a message. By messaging them you’re suggesting that you want to start a conversation. If I was the dude that winked I’d say why you fucking messaging me then if you don’t want to start some sort of convo. If you were the gent winking us we could politely ask can't you fucking read?? Our profile clearly says no winks. If a single guys wants to just say hi, then no worries. But just read the fucking profile and respect it. We felt the need to reply at the swearing level that the comment was made!! My comment still stands. Just seems to me like you wanted everyone to say yeah all single men are stupid but refuse to acknowledge that you sending a message to him was what prompted him to message you. As far as he was concerned he was done after sending the wink. But we politely and clearly ask that people don't send winks. Why not respect that? Or doesn't manners and respect mean anything on here?? " To be honest talking about manners and respect and speaking the way you do about men shows a complete lack of the aforementioned qualities.in yourselves. And ye responded to a wink when you could have just ignored it.It doesn't even make any sense to respond to one if he wasn't what ye were looking for or ye don't like winks. Trying to take the higher ground when ye instigated the whole thing by responding to a wink is ridiculous. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To be fair to the guy if you sent him a message on the back of a wink I can understand why he’d think you might have changed your mind about single guys. A lot of profiles say they don’t meet single guys but then have strings of verifications from single men. Maybe avoid future hassle by not reacting to winks or friend requests of single men. We think that you are obviously right. As we originally said, single men moan when they get ignored, yet any faint comment makes them think they have a chance of free sex. Fuck them. We will join the ignorant crew. Ignore them. Then they moan that no one replies. .... Sad." You guys sound really very bitter about this simple misunderstanding. Maybe you should take a moment and get a cuppa and relax. Then move on from the whole situation with a happier heart. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here." • Then why don't you lead by example? I've just read your profile and you've publicly named and insulted a Fabber by calling 'him' a "Twat" on your Status Update! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. • Then why don't you lead by example? I've just read your profile and you've publicly named and insulted a Fabber by calling 'him' a "Twat" on your Status Update! " But, Nero, they’re members of one of the best clubs, you know. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could it be that the man in question sent a wink and then read your profile? Thought shit better not disturb them cos they don’t want single men, I’m not gonna hear anything back because they specifically don’t want single men. But then you message him, he thinks oh maybe I’m an exception to their rule otherwise why would they take the time to message me when their profile specifically states they don’t want single men. Could possibly be Annie. But good manners would be to read the profile first. Or would it?? Reading a profile is polite. Responding to a message is polite. He couldn't win. Round in circles. Reading a profile is polite. Respecting the clear choices in that same profile is good manners. There wasn't anything to win." But your opening post says you replied because it's polite. So he could have either been impolite by not replying to you, or impolite by not reading or ignoring your profile and replying. So either way, he would have been impolite. The only ways this situation could have been avoided was for you to not respond, for you to have responded with a better comment ("Thanks, but just letting you know we're not interested in single men"), or for you to just not let it get to you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could it be that the man in question sent a wink and then read your profile? Thought shit better not disturb them cos they don’t want single men, I’m not gonna hear anything back because they specifically don’t want single men. But then you message him, he thinks oh maybe I’m an exception to their rule otherwise why would they take the time to message me when their profile specifically states they don’t want single men. Could possibly be Annie. But good manners would be to read the profile first. Or would it?? Reading a profile is polite. Responding to a message is polite. He couldn't win. Round in circles. Reading a profile is polite. Respecting the clear choices in that same profile is good manners. There wasn't anything to win. But your opening post says you replied because it's polite. So he could have either been impolite by not replying to you, or impolite by not reading or ignoring your profile and replying. So either way, he would have been impolite. The only ways this situation could have been avoided was for you to not respond, for you to have responded with a better comment ("Thanks, but just letting you know we're not interested in single men"), or for you to just not let it get to you." No offence, but just to say the same thing again. The polite thing would have been for the single guy to respect our profile and not wink. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. • Then why don't you lead by example? I've just read your profile and you've publicly named and insulted a Fabber by calling 'him' a "Twat" on your Status Update! " And your response to this comment? I notice you’ve deleted it now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. • Then why don't you lead by example? I've just read your profile and you've publicly named and insulted a Fabber by calling 'him' a "Twat" on your Status Update! But, Nero, they’re members of one of the best clubs, you know. " Yes because he repeatedly tols us to fuck off then blocked us. Going back to the club thing, behaviour that wouldn't last seconds over there. But let's be honest. On here you don't have to face the consequences of rude behaviour, do you?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. • Then why don't you lead by example? I've just read your profile and you've publicly named and insulted a Fabber by calling 'him' a "Twat" on your Status Update! And your response to this comment? I notice you’ve deleted it now. " We didn't delete it. Admin chose it not to be acceptable. Fair enough. The chap is still what he is. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To be fair to the guy if you sent him a message on the back of a wink I can understand why he’d think you might have changed your mind about single guys. A lot of profiles say they don’t meet single guys but then have strings of verifications from single men. Maybe avoid future hassle by not reacting to winks or friend requests of single men. We think that you are obviously right. As we originally said, single men moan when they get ignored, yet any faint comment makes them think they have a chance of free sex. Fuck them. We will join the ignorant crew. Ignore them. Then they moan that no one replies. .... Sad. You guys sound really very bitter about this simple misunderstanding. Maybe you should take a moment and get a cuppa and relax. Then move on from the whole situation with a happier heart. " Bitter, no. Just disappointed at all the sad acceptance of bad behaviour on here. How do you misunderstand a profile that is clear. Oh yes, either don't read it, or just ignore it. Like we said, sad. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could it be that the man in question sent a wink and then read your profile? Thought shit better not disturb them cos they don’t want single men, I’m not gonna hear anything back because they specifically don’t want single men. But then you message him, he thinks oh maybe I’m an exception to their rule otherwise why would they take the time to message me when their profile specifically states they don’t want single men. Could possibly be Annie. But good manners would be to read the profile first. Or would it?? Reading a profile is polite. Responding to a message is polite. He couldn't win. Round in circles. Reading a profile is polite. Respecting the clear choices in that same profile is good manners. There wasn't anything to win. But your opening post says you replied because it's polite. So he could have either been impolite by not replying to you, or impolite by not reading or ignoring your profile and replying. So either way, he would have been impolite. The only ways this situation could have been avoided was for you to not respond, for you to have responded with a better comment ("Thanks, but just letting you know we're not interested in single men"), or for you to just not let it get to you. No offence, but just to say the same thing again. The polite thing would have been for the single guy to respect our profile and not wink. " As much as we all wish everyone catered to our exact desires on this site, its just not realistic your not special here. A wink is so harmless and definetly doesn't need a reply. A lot have people pointed this out to you. Just take it as a mistake and move on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could it be that the man in question sent a wink and then read your profile? Thought shit better not disturb them cos they don’t want single men, I’m not gonna hear anything back because they specifically don’t want single men. But then you message him, he thinks oh maybe I’m an exception to their rule otherwise why would they take the time to message me when their profile specifically states they don’t want single men. Could possibly be Annie. But good manners would be to read the profile first. Or would it?? Reading a profile is polite. Responding to a message is polite. He couldn't win. Round in circles. Reading a profile is polite. Respecting the clear choices in that same profile is good manners. There wasn't anything to win. But your opening post says you replied because it's polite. So he could have either been impolite by not replying to you, or impolite by not reading or ignoring your profile and replying. So either way, he would have been impolite. The only ways this situation could have been avoided was for you to not respond, for you to have responded with a better comment ("Thanks, but just letting you know we're not interested in single men"), or for you to just not let it get to you. No offence, but just to say the same thing again. The polite thing would have been for the single guy to respect our profile and not wink. " But do you not see what people are saying, if you don’t like winks (even worse single men) then why respond with a message, which anyone might see as an opening of conversation. Best course of action is just to ignore winks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. • Then why don't you lead by example? I've just read your profile and you've publicly named and insulted a Fabber by calling 'him' a "Twat" on your Status Update! And your response to this comment? I notice you’ve deleted it now. We didn't delete it. Admin chose it not to be acceptable. Fair enough. The chap is still what he is." If he was abusive then report him. But that wasn’t in your OP. And tbh you’ve taken the wrong approach to gain any sympathy when you’ve complained at length at being winked at. He is still what he is and you’ve shown yourself too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To be honest 95% of single guys on here think that a swingers site is a gateway to oversexed, amoral, loose women that will drop their knickers for any troll that comes along. None of them seem to understand or even want to take advice. So many couples just don't bother and block them. It's shame for the genuine guys out there who do understand and know how to communicate civil way in order to meet others. " It's not a shame for genuine guys. It actually lowers the bar and expectation. I only have to act half normal to pass as sane here. Block and ignore is 100% the right thing to do. That didn't happen here though which is half the problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. • Then why don't you lead by example? I've just read your profile and you've publicly named and insulted a Fabber by calling 'him' a "Twat" on your Status Update! And your response to this comment? I notice you’ve deleted it now. We didn't delete it. Admin chose it not to be acceptable. Fair enough. The chap is still what he is. If he was abusive then report him. But that wasn’t in your OP. And tbh you’ve taken the wrong approach to gain any sympathy when you’ve complained at length at being winked at. He is still what he is and you’ve shown yourself too. " Honestly? We aren't looking for sympathy on here. We learnt a long time ago that the people on the Forum are capable of arguing black is white. But the people who have already contacted us? Well it was worth it just for that. Quite simply, we have made some new friends today, and put people off who we don't want to be friends with. Win win. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We always see posts on here from single guys asking why they don't get replies. Yesterday we had a guy wink us. We said thanks. He said he wanted to know if there was any chance of meeting. We have a clear profile. Very clear. We were simply being polite and replying for a change. For the life of us we cannot figure out how being polite becomes 'We will change our choices just for you" We were asked where we are as he regularly comes by the Midlands and would love to meet up. Why? We clearly say no single guys. The guy, you know who you are. But there are LOADS like you. And guys wonder why couples don't reply?? You really don't know?? Do lots of other people get this shit???" Few tips one if a single man winks at you and your not looking for single men don't reply. Two and here's the big one if your going to kick off in here about him asking questions after you answer his wink then set your filter to block single men winking and messaging you. By the look of things you don't have a clue how the site works or what your doing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It's not a shame for genuine guys. It actually lowers the bar and expectation. I only have to act half normal to pass as sane here. " Our bar and expectations remain where they these are never lowered.... lol define sane or normal? no lets not go there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This post has certainly been an education. It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. The general consensus seems to be just ignore it. Yet should it happen? We are regulars at one of the best clibs in the UK. Obviously they attract a different level of people, who respect the choices of others. " I often wonder how far up ones own arse can one get ones head. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It's not a shame for genuine guys. It actually lowers the bar and expectation. I only have to act half normal to pass as sane here. Our bar and expectations remain where they these are never lowered.... lol define sane or normal? no lets not go there " Ah ffs I had my wall charts and thumbtacs at the ready.... Seriously though I've never found the actions of (I'd argue the 95% figure) the bad apples impacted how people treat me. If anything as I said it's easier to stand put from those people | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This post has certainly been an education. It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. The general consensus seems to be just ignore it. Yet should it happen? We are regulars at one of the best clibs in the UK. Obviously they attract a different level of people, who respect the choices of others. " Your both pushing 60 and not photo verified is it a bingo club | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This post has certainly been an education. It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. The general consensus seems to be just ignore it. Yet should it happen? We are regulars at one of the best clibs in the UK. Obviously they attract a different level of people, who respect the choices of others. Your both pushing 60 and not photo verified is it a bingo club " What a line. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is the reason why I’ve stopped messaging altogether now and just drop into the forums now & then. The amount of complaints people post about single guys just not reading, or heeding, to what’s being put in profiles is severely off putting and not wanting to get lumped in with them. " Wise move. Good behaviour pays off. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This post has certainly been an education. It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. The general consensus seems to be just ignore it. Yet should it happen? We are regulars at one of the best clibs in the UK. Obviously they attract a different level of people, who respect the choices of others. Your both pushing 60 and not photo verified is it a bingo club " Funny. It is Xtasia, the best club in the UK. Most people on here can get the bollocks photo verification, that is easy. But being verified by the owners of a club like Xtasia?? We know which one we would find most funny if we had to!! Enjoy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This post has certainly been an education. It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. The general consensus seems to be just ignore it. Yet should it happen? We are regulars at one of the best clibs in the UK. Obviously they attract a different level of people, who respect the choices of others. Your both pushing 60 and not photo verified is it a bingo club " Aahh yes, we get it now. The username. He is a great joker. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is the reason why I’ve stopped messaging altogether now and just drop into the forums now & then. The amount of complaints people post about single guys just not reading, or heeding, to what’s being put in profiles is severely off putting and not wanting to get lumped in with them. Wise move. Good behaviour pays off." I'm not sure if your responses are a lack self awareness, or if you have a way of communicating that projects your illusory superiority. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is the reason why I’ve stopped messaging altogether now and just drop into the forums now & then. The amount of complaints people post about single guys just not reading, or heeding, to what’s being put in profiles is severely off putting and not wanting to get lumped in with them. Wise move. Good behaviour pays off. I'm not sure if your responses are a lack self awareness, or if you have a way of communicating that projects your illusory superiority. " Superiority? Nope. We are what we are. But if someone feels inferior we cannot help that. Most entertaining afternoon! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is the reason why I’ve stopped messaging altogether now and just drop into the forums now & then. The amount of complaints people post about single guys just not reading, or heeding, to what’s being put in profiles is severely off putting and not wanting to get lumped in with them. Wise move. Good behaviour pays off. I'm not sure if your responses are a lack self awareness, or if you have a way of communicating that projects your illusory superiority. Superiority? Nope. We are what we are. But if someone feels inferior we cannot help that. Most entertaining afternoon!" Illusory superiority...You missed off a key word which is at least consistent. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is the reason why I’ve stopped messaging altogether now and just drop into the forums now & then. The amount of complaints people post about single guys just not reading, or heeding, to what’s being put in profiles is severely off putting and not wanting to get lumped in with them. Wise move. Good behaviour pays off. I'm not sure if your responses are a lack self awareness, or if you have a way of communicating that projects your illusory superiority. Superiority? Nope. We are what we are. But if someone feels inferior we cannot help that. Most entertaining afternoon! Illusory superiority...You missed off a key word which is at least consistent. " We understand. Like we said, very entertaining. Getting better by the minute!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This post has certainly been an education. It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. The general consensus seems to be just ignore it. Yet should it happen? We are regulars at one of the best clibs in the UK. Obviously they attract a different level of people, who respect the choices of others. Your both pushing 60 and not photo verified is it a bingo club Funny. It is Xtasia, the best club in the UK. Most people on here can get the bollocks photo verification, that is easy. But being verified by the owners of a club like Xtasia?? We know which one we would find most funny if we had to!! Enjoy." Am sure thay will be very happy with the advertising your giving them on this thread. And all clubs hand out verifications it's the hot couples only private party's that most look at as bragging rights | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just messaged the club your bragging about sure they will be interested in reading this thread and one of my list of places I might go thanks for letting me know the sort of people that go there. " Good for you!! Superstar. See you there. And your next joke?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just messaged the club your bragging about sure they will be interested in reading this thread and one of my list of places I might go thanks for letting me know the sort of people that go there. " You called our club a bingo club. Who has the loud mouth hey?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just messaged the club your bragging about sure they will be interested in reading this thread and one of my list of places I might go thanks for letting me know the sort of people that go there. Good for you!! Superstar. See you there. And your next joke??" It's not a joke single men are most clubs cash cow and even some couples will be put off by some of the things you have said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This post has certainly been an education. It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. The general consensus seems to be just ignore it. Yet should it happen? We are regulars at one of the best clibs in the UK. Obviously they attract a different level of people, who respect the choices of others. Your both pushing 60 and not photo verified is it a bingo club Funny. It is Xtasia, the best club in the UK. Most people on here can get the bollocks photo verification, that is easy. But being verified by the owners of a club like Xtasia?? We know which one we would find most funny if we had to!! Enjoy." Can you confirm you've been to every club in the UK, or is Xtasia the "best in the UK" because it happens to be on your doorstep? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This post has certainly been an education. It is surprising just how many people think that bad manners are acceptable on here. The general consensus seems to be just ignore it. Yet should it happen? We are regulars at one of the best clibs in the UK. Obviously they attract a different level of people, who respect the choices of others. Your both pushing 60 and not photo verified is it a bingo club Funny. It is Xtasia, the best club in the UK. Most people on here can get the bollocks photo verification, that is easy. But being verified by the owners of a club like Xtasia?? We know which one we would find most funny if we had to!! Enjoy. Can you confirm you've been to every club in the UK, or is Xtasia the "best in the UK" because it happens to be on your doorstep?" What an intelligent comment. The reviews speak for themselves. Take a read. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? Any need for that first line ? It is an assumption yes, rightly or wrongly, but you opened the line of communication by responding to a wink. If they are not what you are looking for why would you do that ? Why would they wink? We don't like winks or single men. We can only assume they are stupid. Or are they simply rude and arrogant thinking they can ignore what we say?" And yet stupidly, you chose to message rather than ignore. Then bring it to the forum like it was a big deal. Are you New to the internet and/or social media platforms? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? Any need for that first line ? It is an assumption yes, rightly or wrongly, but you opened the line of communication by responding to a wink. If they are not what you are looking for why would you do that ? Why would they wink? We don't like winks or single men. We can only assume they are stupid. Or are they simply rude and arrogant thinking they can ignore what we say? And yet stupidly, you chose to message rather than ignore. Then bring it to the forum like it was a big deal. Are you New to the internet and/or social media platforms?" Yes. Brand new. Manners aren't new though, are they? Even from couples it seems... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just messaged the club your bragging about sure they will be interested in reading this thread and one of my list of places I might go thanks for letting me know the sort of people that go there. " Phone that was off my list of places might go | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? Any need for that first line ? It is an assumption yes, rightly or wrongly, but you opened the line of communication by responding to a wink. If they are not what you are looking for why would you do that ? Why would they wink? We don't like winks or single men. We can only assume they are stupid. Or are they simply rude and arrogant thinking they can ignore what we say? And yet stupidly, you chose to message rather than ignore. Then bring it to the forum like it was a big deal. Are you New to the internet and/or social media platforms? Yes. Brand new. Manners aren't new though, are they? Even from couples it seems..." How dare they question such a refined mannerly couple. Shame on them all. Tut tut. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? Any need for that first line ? It is an assumption yes, rightly or wrongly, but you opened the line of communication by responding to a wink. If they are not what you are looking for why would you do that ? Why would they wink? We don't like winks or single men. We can only assume they are stupid. Or are they simply rude and arrogant thinking they can ignore what we say? And yet stupidly, you chose to message rather than ignore. Then bring it to the forum like it was a big deal. Are you New to the internet and/or social media platforms? Yes. Brand new. Manners aren't new though, are they? Even from couples it seems... How dare they question such a refined mannerly couple. Shame on them all. Tut tut." Honestly? We don't give a shit. Just makes sure that our block list gets bigger and bigger. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? Any need for that first line ? It is an assumption yes, rightly or wrongly, but you opened the line of communication by responding to a wink. If they are not what you are looking for why would you do that ? Why would they wink? We don't like winks or single men. We can only assume they are stupid. Or are they simply rude and arrogant thinking they can ignore what we say? And yet stupidly, you chose to message rather than ignore. Then bring it to the forum like it was a big deal. Are you New to the internet and/or social media platforms? Yes. Brand new. Manners aren't new though, are they? Even from couples it seems... How dare they question such a refined mannerly couple. Shame on them all. Tut tut. Honestly? We don't give a shit. Just makes sure that our block list gets bigger and bigger." If I were you would just stop your not putting the club your so proud of in a good light and being rude to single men is one thing on here but rude to couples. Your not privet messaging the whole of fab can read this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? Any need for that first line ? It is an assumption yes, rightly or wrongly, but you opened the line of communication by responding to a wink. If they are not what you are looking for why would you do that ? Why would they wink? We don't like winks or single men. We can only assume they are stupid. Or are they simply rude and arrogant thinking they can ignore what we say? And yet stupidly, you chose to message rather than ignore. Then bring it to the forum like it was a big deal. Are you New to the internet and/or social media platforms? Yes. Brand new. Manners aren't new though, are they? Even from couples it seems..." I take it you're posting your replies with your eyes closed? You are coming across very rude, to say the least. The hypocrisy you express is embarrassing. To be straight, it seems to me you messaged a guy that winked you to look for an argument. May I suggest you delete that you're a laid back couple, because the one posting certainly isn't. Though that's evident in your profile. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just makes sure that our block list gets bigger and bigger." Just yours? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just makes sure that our block list gets bigger and bigger. Just yours?" We don't care about anyone else's. Whoever choses to block us would be doing us a favour. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just makes sure that our block list gets bigger and bigger. Just yours? We don't care about anyone else's. Whoever choses to block us would be doing us a favour." More like they are doing themselves a favour and avoiding a very unsavoury couple! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is great entertainment. How long can it keep going? " • It depends upon the size of your popcorn container. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just makes sure that our block list gets bigger and bigger. Just yours? We don't care about anyone else's. Whoever choses to block us would be doing us a favour. More like they are doing themselves a favour and avoiding a very unsavoury couple! " Unsavoury? The feeling is totally mutual. Loving this by the minute!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is great entertainment. How long can it keep going? • It depends upon the size of your popcorn container. " Will there be a part 2 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I like to think I read bios and be respectful in my messages. Rarely attatch a photo unless requested in profile. Still get ignored more than replied. I'd rather be told they're not interested than simply dismissed. I get that most couples, women will be inundated with messages but, still... its nice to be nice! " Yes of course we should all be nice all of the time However, if every day you received unwanted messages from gay/bi men (which you clearly aren't interested in) how many weeks/months/years would you keep replying politely to them? The problem here is that females and couples suffer from this issue far more than guys do. They also have a lot more choice. That explains the relative expressions of tolerance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is great entertainment. How long can it keep going? • It depends upon the size of your popcorn container. Will there be a part 2 " • Mate, it's going to be a trilogy - "Lord of the anal-Rings". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I like to think I read bios and be respectful in my messages. Rarely attatch a photo unless requested in profile. Still get ignored more than replied. I'd rather be told they're not interested than simply dismissed. I get that most couples, women will be inundated with messages but, still... its nice to be nice! Yes of course we should all be nice all of the time However, if every day you received unwanted messages from gay/bi men (which you clearly aren't interested in) how many weeks/months/years would you keep replying politely to them? The problem here is that females and couples suffer from this issue far more than guys do. They also have a lot more choice. That explains the relative expressions of tolerance. " I like to think I am a problem solver…. So if you want to filter people… and the site gives you the option to filter people… How about using the filter to filter the people you want to filter….. I know…. Mind…. Blown!!!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Let’s all wink at them. Join me in winking. If they self combust then it was meli’s idea first." • I don't think Melí has the eloquence to be so vituperative. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Rightly or wrongly, I’m guessing that a lot of chaps would make the assumption that there was interest if they got a message response from a wink. Your options are to either not respond to the wink and block that person to prevent any more interaction, or block men entirely. There will always be those that skip to the pictures and press send message without thinking. Simple question. Are they all stupid?? That is a ridiculous assumption. There is a 'NO' in the profile. If this was a club and face to face, a guy behaving like this would be thrown out. If it was in a pub, and someone wouldn't take no for an answer, then it could well end up nasty. Is it because they can hide behind a screen here?? Any need for that first line ? It is an assumption yes, rightly or wrongly, but you opened the line of communication by responding to a wink. If they are not what you are looking for why would you do that ? " No interested for what ever reason. Don not communicate. I just keep deleting and Blocking,it's so far easier. People have no time for some,treat them the very same way. The Ocean is very vast. Keep swimming. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Let’s all wink at them. Join me in winking. If they self combust then it was meli’s idea first. • I don't think Melí has the eloquence to be so vituperative. " *for the purpose of the thread I have a blank expression* Google’s… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Let’s all wink at them. Join me in winking. If they self combust then it was meli’s idea first. • I don't think Melí has the eloquence to be so vituperative. *for the purpose of the thread I have a blank expression* Google’s…" vituperative-‘bitter and abusive.’ Hey… I’m just being mischievous. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Let’s all wink at them. Join me in winking. If they self combust then it was meli’s idea first." We won’t self combust. But every winker is just surely yet another wanker who rudely ignores profiles. Like the rhyming words!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Let’s all wink at them. Join me in winking. If they self combust then it was meli’s idea first. We won’t self combust. But every winker is just surely yet another wanker who rudely ignores profiles. Like the rhyming words!! " I’m knocking one out as we speak. I still haven’t read your profile though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There might be a workable strategy here..... I hate single women and I hate winks..... Now just a matter of waiting..." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" " Oh celebrities | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There might be a workable strategy here..... I hate single women and I hate winks..... Now just a matter of waiting..." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So am I getting this right.... Guy winks... You reply to guy who winked to say thanks for wink, even though you don't like said winks and guy is not what you're looking for..... Getting all antsy because guy gets peeved because you messaged but not interested?.... I clearly state no friends requests without talking first, but I'm not gonna engage in a conversation to say thanks for the friends request to someone I'm not interested in as I'm then contradicting myself by engaging in conversation and confusion ensues...." And I don’t think you’d start a thread to have a go at single men as the OP has! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So am I getting this right.... Guy winks... You reply to guy who winked to say thanks for wink, even though you don't like said winks and guy is not what you're looking for..... Getting all antsy because guy gets peeved because you messaged but not interested?.... I clearly state no friends requests without talking first, but I'm not gonna engage in a conversation to say thanks for the friends request to someone I'm not interested in as I'm then contradicting myself by engaging in conversation and confusion ensues.... And I don’t think you’d start a thread to have a go at single men as the OP has! " bingo | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |