FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Double Standards Or Just Hypocrisy?
Double Standards Or Just Hypocrisy?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I couldn't care less what other people do tbh." Same same. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I couldn't care less what other people do tbh."  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. " Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I couldn't care less what other people do tbh. Same same." Liar! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really "And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I couldn't care less what other people do tbh. Same same. Liar!" Hello darling | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Which do you think Fabsters? 1) A thread poster said avatar pictures should be compulsory but theirs had their faces covered with filter masks 2) A women thread poster complained and said she'd block men with cock pics yet had numerous boob and pussy pics 3) A women's profile states that she'd automatically delete messages from men with silhouette avatars and block them yet hers just shows her boobs Have you come across this sort of thing?" Never noticed any cock pics on here. Seen the occasional boob though. Might have to pay a bit more attention. Avatar was a great movie. Bet those blue buggers had massive cocks too! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different. "Now I've got that bloody song in my head! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I couldn't care less what other people do tbh. Same same. Liar! Hello darling "Hello darling, just testing your theory! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really "You're not wrong - but that's up to them. I certainly wouldn't want to interact with them so by extension I couldn't give a monkey's. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on." Yes. This. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. " Yep | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on." I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on." There are no box seats on fab...just musical chairs! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Which do you think Fabsters? 1) A thread poster said avatar pictures should be compulsory but theirs had their faces covered with filter masks 2) A women thread poster complained and said she'd block men with cock pics yet had numerous boob and pussy pics 3) A women's profile states that she'd automatically delete messages from men with silhouette avatars and block them yet hers just shows her boobs Have you come across this sort of thing?" Has all of this been observed n the fora though? Or is it theoretical? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Which do you think Fabsters? 1) A thread poster said avatar pictures should be compulsory but theirs had their faces covered with filter masks 2) A women thread poster complained and said she'd block men with cock pics yet had numerous boob and pussy pics 3) A women's profile states that she'd automatically delete messages from men with silhouette avatars and block them yet hers just shows her boobs Have you come across this sort of thing? Never noticed any cock pics on here. Seen the occasional boob though. Might have to pay a bit more attention. Avatar was a great movie. Bet those blue buggers had massive cocks too! " Those massive Blue Buggers!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Now I've got that bloody song in my head! "Oh, that was unintentional, Which song ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different. "Okay, and I don't want to be confrontational with you, but really!  that's really is the height of hypocrisy! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
You're not wrong - but that's up to them. I certainly wouldn't want to interact with them so by extension I couldn't give a monkey's."Fair point | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Okay, and I don't want to be confrontational with you, but really! that's really is the height of hypocrisy!"How I prefer men that are athletic and I'm clearly not, it doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't go to gym. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Okay, and I don't want to be confrontational with you, but really! that's really is the height of hypocrisy!"It’s their choice? Life is easier if you do you, and let them live their lives as they wish. If it’s not for you, move on and look elsewhere | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on." Don't I know that, my Fabster brother, the Ratio! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So If I say I only want men who wear purple underwear to message me, but here I am wearing red underwear. Am I being a hypocrite for preferring something else? " But if you let them fk you then all is forgiven. It is the frustrations that causes the concern about these double standards. Otherwise nobody would care if they were getting laid.
Two things only the people anxiously desire — bread and circuses
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. " This ^ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue." What does this mean? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. Yes. This. " delusional | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Okay, and I don't want to be confrontational with you, but really! that's really is the height of hypocrisy!
How I prefer men that are athletic and I'm clearly not, it doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't go to gym. "the way fab works though if a not athletic man prefers a athletic woman he will get mocked or accused of fat shaming or whatever its just how social media works these days haha men are the evil ones | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue." It’s not a question of having a spine, its about having respect for yourself, I wouldn’t entertain those type of profiles he’s talking about, but I know the vast majority of men will jump through hoops, that’s why women can do what they like, I mean you can either moan about it, or move on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So If I say I only want men who wear purple underwear to message me, but here I am wearing red underwear. Am I being a hypocrite for preferring something else? " This is where it gets confusing though because you are seeing him in pants that he wore at that point in time. What if he has all colours of pants would you dismiss him because of the one pair of purple people eaters? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Which do you think Fabsters? 1) A thread poster said avatar pictures should be compulsory but theirs had their faces covered with filter masks 2) A women thread poster complained and said she'd block men with cock pics yet had numerous boob and pussy pics 3) A women's profile states that she'd automatically delete messages from men with silhouette avatars and block them yet hers just shows her boobs Have you come across this sort of thing?" People read profiles before messaging? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. Yes. This. "Please, I'm genuinely not being condescending or sarcastic in anyway but thank you for saying what have been a women. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. It’s not a question of having a spine, its about having respect for yourself, I wouldn’t entertain those type of profiles he’s talking about, but I know the vast majority of men will jump through hoops, that’s why women can do what they like, I mean you can either moan about it, or move on." ^ 100% that. It's the desperate men that jump through hoops. There really is no need for it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I couldn't care less what other people do tbh. Same same." Yup | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean?" A man will be along shortly to explain | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So If I say I only want men who wear purple underwear to message me, but here I am wearing red underwear. Am I being a hypocrite for preferring something else? " Of course not, but with all due respect you're being obtuse. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Which do you think Fabsters? 1) A thread poster said avatar pictures should be compulsory but theirs had their faces covered with filter masks 2) A women thread poster complained and said she'd block men with cock pics yet had numerous boob and pussy pics 3) A women's profile states that she'd automatically delete messages from men with silhouette avatars and block them yet hers just shows her boobs Have you come across this sort of thing?" All the time - it’s no big deal, I just move on… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Now I've got that bloody song in my head! "What song? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. It’s not a question of having a spine, its about having respect for yourself, I wouldn’t entertain those type of profiles he’s talking about, but I know the vast majority of men will jump through hoops, that’s why women can do what they like, I mean you can either moan about it, or move on. ^ 100% that. It's the desperate men that jump through hoops. There really is no need for it." I don't want him jumping through hoops, I just want the cake  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. Yes. This.
delusional"I’m delusional? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. It’s not a question of having a spine, its about having respect for yourself, I wouldn’t entertain those type of profiles he’s talking about, but I know the vast majority of men will jump through hoops, that’s why women can do what they like, I mean you can either moan about it, or move on." We're on the same track here but I guess we view it different ways. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? A man will be along shortly to explain " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Okay, and I don't want to be confrontational with you, but really! that's really is the height of hypocrisy!
How I prefer men that are athletic and I'm clearly not, it doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't go to gym.
the way fab works though if a not athletic man prefers a athletic woman he will get mocked or accused of fat shaming or whatever its just how social media works these days haha men are the evil ones "Nobody can be accused of fat shaming unless they say something derogatory against fat people. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue." And look where it's got me! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. And look where it's got me!" With all respect - complaining about it doesn't communicate that.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Which do you think Fabsters? 1) A thread poster said avatar pictures should be compulsory but theirs had their faces covered with filter masks 2) A women thread poster complained and said she'd block men with cock pics yet had numerous boob and pussy pics 3) A women's profile states that she'd automatically delete messages from men with silhouette avatars and block them yet hers just shows her boobs Have you come across this sort of thing? People read profiles before messaging? "Brilliant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Which do you think Fabsters? 1) A thread poster said avatar pictures should be compulsory but theirs had their faces covered with filter masks 2) A women thread poster complained and said she'd block men with cock pics yet had numerous boob and pussy pics 3) A women's profile states that she'd automatically delete messages from men with silhouette avatars and block them yet hers just shows her boobs Have you come across this sort of thing?" Have I come across people having preferences and articulating them? Yes, yes I have. Mrs TMN | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Okay, and I don't want to be confrontational with you, but really! that's really is the height of hypocrisy!
How I prefer men that are athletic and I'm clearly not, it doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't go to gym.
the way fab works though if a not athletic man prefers a athletic woman he will get mocked or accused of fat shaming or whatever its just how social media works these days haha men are the evil ones
Nobody can be accused of fat shaming unless they say something derogatory against fat people.
"some people put 2 and 2 together and make 5 trust me these days social media is a middle aged straight white guy witch hunt haha not be flippant just the way it is these days haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. It’s not a question of having a spine, its about having respect for yourself, I wouldn’t entertain those type of profiles he’s talking about, but I know the vast majority of men will jump through hoops, that’s why women can do what they like, I mean you can either moan about it, or move on. ^ 100% that. It's the desperate men that jump through hoops. There really is no need for it. I don't want him jumping through hoops, I just want the cake "There's cake??  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Which do you think Fabsters? 1) A thread poster said avatar pictures should be compulsory but theirs had their faces covered with filter masks 2) A women thread poster complained and said she'd block men with cock pics yet had numerous boob and pussy pics 3) A women's profile states that she'd automatically delete messages from men with silhouette avatars and block them yet hers just shows her boobs Have you come across this sort of thing? Have I come across people having preferences and articulating them? Yes, yes I have. Mrs TMN " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Okay, and I don't want to be confrontational with you, but really! that's really is the height of hypocrisy!
How I prefer men that are athletic and I'm clearly not, it doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't go to gym.
the way fab works though if a not athletic man prefers a athletic woman he will get mocked or accused of fat shaming or whatever its just how social media works these days haha men are the evil ones
Nobody can be accused of fat shaming unless they say something derogatory against fat people.
"Did you mean accused or guilty? They're very different things and folk accuse others without any base, understanding or truth frequently | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. It’s not a question of having a spine, its about having respect for yourself, I wouldn’t entertain those type of profiles he’s talking about, but I know the vast majority of men will jump through hoops, that’s why women can do what they like, I mean you can either moan about it, or move on. ^ 100% that. It's the desperate men that jump through hoops. There really is no need for it. I don't want him jumping through hoops, I just want the cake
There's cake?? "I have caterpillar cake you are welcome to share | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Okay, and I don't want to be confrontational with you, but really! that's really is the height of hypocrisy!
How I prefer men that are athletic and I'm clearly not, it doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't go to gym.
the way fab works though if a not athletic man prefers a athletic woman he will get mocked or accused of fat shaming or whatever its just how social media works these days haha men are the evil ones
Nobody can be accused of fat shaming unless they say something derogatory against fat people.
some people put 2 and 2 together and make 5 trust me these days social media is a middle aged straight white guy witch hunt haha not be flippant just the way it is these days haha"I whole heartedly agree with people putting 2 and 2 together to make 5 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So If I say I only want men who wear purple underwear to message me, but here I am wearing red underwear. Am I being a hypocrite for preferring something else? Of course not, but with all due respect you're being obtuse." I don't think I am. I used an example that would be obvious to my point. Your preferences doesn't automatically reflect on yourself and how you should look/behave/prefer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. Yes. This.
Please, I'm genuinely not being condescending or sarcastic in anyway but thank you for saying what have been a women. "It is true, the only person I have to answer to is myself. I said earlier I make rules on here but I also break my own rules. If you think what someone says they want is contradictory to what you think they show then I would just say you aren’t matched and move on. Simple. Why antagonise yourself over these questions when you could just enjoy life somewhere else instead? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. It’s not a question of having a spine, its about having respect for yourself, I wouldn’t entertain those type of profiles he’s talking about, but I know the vast majority of men will jump through hoops, that’s why women can do what they like, I mean you can either moan about it, or move on. ^ 100% that. It's the desperate men that jump through hoops. There really is no need for it. I don't want him jumping through hoops, I just want the cake
There's cake??
I have caterpillar cake you are welcome to share " How very kind! My favourite | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean?" Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Okay, and I don't want to be confrontational with you, but really! that's really is the height of hypocrisy!
How I prefer men that are athletic and I'm clearly not, it doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't go to gym.
the way fab works though if a not athletic man prefers a athletic woman he will get mocked or accused of fat shaming or whatever its just how social media works these days haha men are the evil ones
Nobody can be accused of fat shaming unless they say something derogatory against fat people.
Did you mean accused or guilty? They're very different things and folk accuse others without any base, understanding or truth frequently "There are many accusations that are based on hearsay rather than actual facts I would agree. I meant accused as that is what was being discussed by the previous poster. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Which do you think Fabsters? 1) A thread poster said avatar pictures should be compulsory but theirs had their faces covered with filter masks 2) A women thread poster complained and said she'd block men with cock pics yet had numerous boob and pussy pics 3) A women's profile states that she'd automatically delete messages from men with silhouette avatars and block them yet hers just shows her boobs Have you come across this sort of thing?" Forget the single females you will be wasting your time and energy trying to make sense of it and the competition is something fierce, hit the clubs running and do yourself a favour. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong!" I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it?   | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Okay, and I don't want to be confrontational with you, but really! that's really is the height of hypocrisy!
How I prefer men that are athletic and I'm clearly not, it doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't go to gym. "Of course it doesn't but you haven't posted that all people should be athletic even though I'm a couch potato which is what this thread was about | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Which do you think Fabsters? 1) A thread poster said avatar pictures should be compulsory but theirs had their faces covered with filter masks 2) A women thread poster complained and said she'd block men with cock pics yet had numerous boob and pussy pics 3) A women's profile states that she'd automatically delete messages from men with silhouette avatars and block them yet hers just shows her boobs Have you come across this sort of thing?" Quick answer: each to their own. Longer answer: I'm not even sure if any of these are that hypocritical. There's a difference between shadow head and any other pic. At least a pic shows you've down something. Uo to individuals what they show, but no pic does feel creepy. (Fab upgrade: hide profiles from anyone without pics) Middle one is osest (did it say any cock pics or just coxk pics). But still, is a person's choice. Maybe they like the excitement of finding out what a cock looks like irl? The penis length lottery ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. It’s not a question of having a spine, its about having respect for yourself, I wouldn’t entertain those type of profiles he’s talking about, but I know the vast majority of men will jump through hoops, that’s why women can do what they like, I mean you can either moan about it, or move on. ^ 100% that. It's the desperate men that jump through hoops. There really is no need for it. I don't want him jumping through hoops, I just want the cake "I only joined for the cake | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. It’s not a question of having a spine, its about having respect for yourself, I wouldn’t entertain those type of profiles he’s talking about, but I know the vast majority of men will jump through hoops, that’s why women can do what they like, I mean you can either moan about it, or move on. ^ 100% that. It's the desperate men that jump through hoops. There really is no need for it. I don't want him jumping through hoops, I just want the cake
I only joined for the cake"There might be a bit of cake left. Just a bit though sorry | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Double Standards Or Just Hypocrisy? Neither. Next" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. It’s not a question of having a spine, its about having respect for yourself, I wouldn’t entertain those type of profiles he’s talking about, but I know the vast majority of men will jump through hoops, that’s why women can do what they like, I mean you can either moan about it, or move on. ^ 100% that. It's the desperate men that jump through hoops. There really is no need for it. I don't want him jumping through hoops, I just want the cake
I only joined for the cake
There might be a bit of cake left. Just a bit though sorry"What sort of cake? Does it have chocolate frosting? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Okay, and I don't want to be confrontational with you, but really! that's really is the height of hypocrisy!
How I prefer men that are athletic and I'm clearly not, it doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't go to gym.
Of course it doesn't but you haven't posted that all people should be athletic even though I'm a couch potato which is what this thread was about "My response was to Fallen's "They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different." And you saying that was the height of hypocrisy. People are allowed their own preferences even if they make no sense to you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. It’s not a question of having a spine, its about having respect for yourself, I wouldn’t entertain those type of profiles he’s talking about, but I know the vast majority of men will jump through hoops, that’s why women can do what they like, I mean you can either moan about it, or move on. ^ 100% that. It's the desperate men that jump through hoops. There really is no need for it. I don't want him jumping through hoops, I just want the cake
I only joined for the cake
There might be a bit of cake left. Just a bit though sorry
What sort of cake? Does it have chocolate frosting? "It's a caterpillar cake | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it? "Simply that if more men had a bit more self respect and didn't attempt to jump through the more ridiculous (hypocritical) demands on some profiles in a vain attempt to get laid, the more power they would have themselves. I'm not saying it's a battle of the sexes, or preferences, it just seems absurd to me that people would attempt to do so in order to try and get some attention. Each to their own though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So If I say I only want men who wear purple underwear to message me, but here I am wearing red underwear. Am I being a hypocrite for preferring something else? Of course not, but with all due respect you're being obtuse. I don't think I am. I used an example that would be obvious to my point. Your preferences doesn't automatically reflect on yourself and how you should look/behave/prefer. " No I'm not, my thread title and initial message clearly, clearly, meant that it was either double standards or hypocritical if you said one thing but your was the other! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. It’s not a question of having a spine, its about having respect for yourself, I wouldn’t entertain those type of profiles he’s talking about, but I know the vast majority of men will jump through hoops, that’s why women can do what they like, I mean you can either moan about it, or move on. ^ 100% that. It's the desperate men that jump through hoops. There really is no need for it. I don't want him jumping through hoops, I just want the cake
I only joined for the cake
There might be a bit of cake left. Just a bit though sorry
What sort of cake? Does it have chocolate frosting?
It's a caterpillar cake "Colin? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Boo. Hoo."  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So If I say I only want men who wear purple underwear to message me, but here I am wearing red underwear. Am I being a hypocrite for preferring something else? Of course not, but with all due respect you're being obtuse. I don't think I am. I used an example that would be obvious to my point. Your preferences doesn't automatically reflect on yourself and how you should look/behave/prefer. No I'm not, my thread title and initial message clearly, clearly, meant that it was either double standards or hypocritical if you said one thing but your was the other! "Yes and I'm clearly saying it's neither... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And with all due respect, with your points 1 and 3 the woman is still showing more of herself than a generic silhouette picture. " Do you know want, block me! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it?
Simply that if more men had a bit more self respect and didn't attempt to jump through the more ridiculous (hypocritical) demands on some profiles in a vain attempt to get laid, the more power they would have themselves.
I'm not saying it's a battle of the sexes, or preferences, it just seems absurd to me that people would attempt to do so in order to try and get some attention.
Each to their own though."Thank you, Lib. I'd agree it's not a battle of the sexes but certainly I would describe it as a battle of perspectives. Men may see the requests women put in their profiles/statuses as ridiculous demands (hypocritical even from this OP). Women may see that they have no choice to add requests or state what they will block/delete. Because they're responding to the number of messages they get from men. Which are at times rude, entitled or abusive. Or just plain monotonous or lazy. Eg "How's you" x35. It's tricky. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it?
Simply that if more men had a bit more self respect and didn't attempt to jump through the more ridiculous (hypocritical) demands on some profiles in a vain attempt to get laid, the more power they would have themselves.
I'm not saying it's a battle of the sexes, or preferences, it just seems absurd to me that people would attempt to do so in order to try and get some attention.
Each to their own though.
Thank you, Lib. I'd agree it's not a battle of the sexes but certainly I would describe it as a battle of perspectives. Men may see the requests women put in their profiles/statuses as ridiculous demands (hypocritical even from this OP). Women may see that they have no choice to add requests or state what they will block/delete. Because they're responding to the number of messages they get from men. Which are at times rude, entitled or abusive. Or just plain monotonous or lazy. Eg "How's you" x35.
It's tricky. "And that's great for them. I'm not complaining. I just wouldn't participate personally. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it?
Simply that if more men had a bit more self respect and didn't attempt to jump through the more ridiculous (hypocritical) demands on some profiles in a vain attempt to get laid, the more power they would have themselves.
I'm not saying it's a battle of the sexes, or preferences, it just seems absurd to me that people would attempt to do so in order to try and get some attention.
Each to their own though.
Thank you, Lib. I'd agree it's not a battle of the sexes but certainly I would describe it as a battle of perspectives. Men may see the requests women put in their profiles/statuses as ridiculous demands (hypocritical even from this OP). Women may see that they have no choice to add requests or state what they will block/delete. Because they're responding to the number of messages they get from men. Which are at times rude, entitled or abusive. Or just plain monotonous or lazy. Eg "How's you" x35.
It's tricky. "Urgh the How’s you opener…it’s great to start with but follow it up with something interesting that lets me know you actually read my profile and let’s not get started on the ones that message 20 more times because you didn’t answer their first message 5 minutes ago… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer" I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread? "Was I? I didn’t notice at all. We’ve had no interaction do I have no idea. Wow. I’m honoured | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
m
FYI, I can run my profile exactly as I please, but thanks for the thread. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread? "OP that kind of behaviour is really not on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is great, I’ve never been the subject of a thread before, especially as I only use this for the forums and I’ve never received messages from the OP but I must say, I’m very flattered m
FYI, I can run my profile exactly as I please, but thanks for the thread. "Congratulations on your first dedicated thread. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
OP that kind of behaviour is really not on. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread? "Actually, having thought about it for a few seconds. How fucking dare you. We have never even spoken and what I choose to write on my profile is absolutely none of your business. Now you’ve pointed out to the whole forum that this is partly about me? You’re out of order. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is great, I’ve never been the subject of a thread before, especially as I only use this for the forums and I’ve never received messages from the OP but I must say, I’m very flattered m
FYI, I can run my profile exactly as I please, but thanks for the thread. "Can i get your autograph? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
OP that kind of behaviour is really not on. "Thankyou. He’s just a bit of a bully obviously. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
Was I? I didn’t notice at all. We’ve had no interaction do I have no idea.
Wow. I’m honoured "So it was "don't send me dick pics" rather than "no dick pics at all". That feels okay to me. Bigger things to worry about. Like if buzz light-year doesn't know he's a toy, why does he stop moving when people are about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is great, I’ve never been the subject of a thread before, especially as I only use this for the forums and I’ve never received messages from the OP but I must say, I’m very flattered m
FYI, I can run my profile exactly as I please, but thanks for the thread.
Can i get your autograph? "Of course honey | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it?
Simply that if more men had a bit more self respect and didn't attempt to jump through the more ridiculous (hypocritical) demands on some profiles in a vain attempt to get laid, the more power they would have themselves.
I'm not saying it's a battle of the sexes, or preferences, it just seems absurd to me that people would attempt to do so in order to try and get some attention.
Each to their own though.
Thank you, Lib. I'd agree it's not a battle of the sexes but certainly I would describe it as a battle of perspectives. Men may see the requests women put in their profiles/statuses as ridiculous demands (hypocritical even from this OP). Women may see that they have no choice to add requests or state what they will block/delete. Because they're responding to the number of messages they get from men. Which are at times rude, entitled or abusive. Or just plain monotonous or lazy. Eg "How's you" x35.
It's tricky.
And that's great for them. I'm not complaining. I just wouldn't participate personally."Of course. Although I do find the topic of requests to "messagers" quite an interesting one. I can't say I enjoy constantly rewriting my profile to head off more messages or being quite so negative. And where would you draw the line? Is being asked to "be polite" off-putting if you consider yourself a polite man? It's like being punished for others' bad behaviour. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is great, I’ve never been the subject of a thread before, especially as I only use this for the forums and I’ve never received messages from the OP but I must say, I’m very flattered m
FYI, I can run my profile exactly as I please, but thanks for the thread.
Can i get your autograph?
Of course honey "I'm screen shotting this for proof | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
Was I? I didn’t notice at all. We’ve had no interaction do I have no idea.
Wow. I’m honoured
So it was "don't send me dick pics" rather than "no dick pics at all". That feels okay to me.
Bigger things to worry about.
Like if buzz light-year doesn't know he's a toy, why does he stop moving when people are about. "Yeah, I just don’t want dick pics flooding my inbox (I still get them). OP is obviously just a bitter bully, no idea why, we’ve never even spoken! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
Actually, having thought about it for a few seconds. How fucking dare you. We have never even spoken and what I choose to write on my profile is absolutely none of your business. Now you’ve pointed out to the whole forum that this is partly about me? You’re out of order." He certainly is!  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think people should probably be able to run their profile as they wish, without being criticised for it. Okay, I respect your fine point, but don't you think it's a bit of "do as I say but not as I do" and that's my point if this thread really
And that’s their prerogative. They can set their preferences, and still put pics or desires up that are different.
Okay, and I don't want to be confrontational with you, but really! that's really is the height of hypocrisy!
How I prefer men that are athletic and I'm clearly not, it doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't go to gym.
the way fab works though if a not athletic man prefers a athletic woman he will get mocked or accused of fat shaming or whatever its just how social media works these days haha men are the evil ones
Nobody can be accused of fat shaming unless they say something derogatory against fat people.
Did you mean accused or guilty? They're very different things and folk accuse others without any base, understanding or truth frequently
There are many accusations that are based on hearsay rather than actual facts I would agree. I meant accused as that is what was being discussed by the previous poster. "But anyone can accuse anyone of anything. Whether it's true or not is another matter, innit x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread? "Oh Christ. Just when I thought this couldn't get worse. And there was someone defending you, as they think we're attacking you for having a difference in opinion. And actually YOU were the one attacking someone else! Oooo um is this hypocrisy or double standards OP??? I'll let you have an opinion on that one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
Oh Christ. Just when I thought this couldn't get worse.
And there was someone defending you, as they think we're attacking you for having a difference in opinion.
And actually YOU were the one attacking someone else!
Oooo um is this hypocrisy or double standards OP??? I'll let you have an opinion on that one. "I’ve never even spoken to OP!! No idea why he’s attacking me! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it?
Simply that if more men had a bit more self respect and didn't attempt to jump through the more ridiculous (hypocritical) demands on some profiles in a vain attempt to get laid, the more power they would have themselves.
I'm not saying it's a battle of the sexes, or preferences, it just seems absurd to me that people would attempt to do so in order to try and get some attention.
Each to their own though.
Thank you, Lib. I'd agree it's not a battle of the sexes but certainly I would describe it as a battle of perspectives. Men may see the requests women put in their profiles/statuses as ridiculous demands (hypocritical even from this OP). Women may see that they have no choice to add requests or state what they will block/delete. Because they're responding to the number of messages they get from men. Which are at times rude, entitled or abusive. Or just plain monotonous or lazy. Eg "How's you" x35.
It's tricky.
And that's great for them. I'm not complaining. I just wouldn't participate personally.
Of course. Although I do find the topic of requests to "messagers" quite an interesting one. I can't say I enjoy constantly rewriting my profile to head off more messages or being quite so negative. And where would you draw the line? Is being asked to "be polite" off-putting if you consider yourself a polite man? It's like being punished for others' bad behaviour. "I don't know the answers to you questions I'm afraid and I think it's veering off from the original point such as a woman with no avatar complaining about men with no avatar - which is the kind of thing I was referring too. Like my original statement- I honestly couldn't care less what people do with their profiles. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread? "Wow.. Just wow  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it?
Simply that if more men had a bit more self respect and didn't attempt to jump through the more ridiculous (hypocritical) demands on some profiles in a vain attempt to get laid, the more power they would have themselves.
I'm not saying it's a battle of the sexes, or preferences, it just seems absurd to me that people would attempt to do so in order to try and get some attention.
Each to their own though.
Thank you, Lib. I'd agree it's not a battle of the sexes but certainly I would describe it as a battle of perspectives. Men may see the requests women put in their profiles/statuses as ridiculous demands (hypocritical even from this OP). Women may see that they have no choice to add requests or state what they will block/delete. Because they're responding to the number of messages they get from men. Which are at times rude, entitled or abusive. Or just plain monotonous or lazy. Eg "How's you" x35.
It's tricky.
And that's great for them. I'm not complaining. I just wouldn't participate personally.
Of course. Although I do find the topic of requests to "messagers" quite an interesting one. I can't say I enjoy constantly rewriting my profile to head off more messages or being quite so negative. And where would you draw the line? Is being asked to "be polite" off-putting if you consider yourself a polite man? It's like being punished for others' bad behaviour.
I don't know the answers to you questions I'm afraid and I think it's veering off from the original point such as a woman with no avatar complaining about men with no avatar - which is the kind of thing I was referring too.
Like my original statement- I honestly couldn't care less what people do with their profiles. "I think the woman does have an avatar! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it?
Simply that if more men had a bit more self respect and didn't attempt to jump through the more ridiculous (hypocritical) demands on some profiles in a vain attempt to get laid, the more power they would have themselves.
I'm not saying it's a battle of the sexes, or preferences, it just seems absurd to me that people would attempt to do so in order to try and get some attention.
Each to their own though.
Thank you, Lib. I'd agree it's not a battle of the sexes but certainly I would describe it as a battle of perspectives. Men may see the requests women put in their profiles/statuses as ridiculous demands (hypocritical even from this OP). Women may see that they have no choice to add requests or state what they will block/delete. Because they're responding to the number of messages they get from men. Which are at times rude, entitled or abusive. Or just plain monotonous or lazy. Eg "How's you" x35.
It's tricky.
And that's great for them. I'm not complaining. I just wouldn't participate personally.
Of course. Although I do find the topic of requests to "messagers" quite an interesting one. I can't say I enjoy constantly rewriting my profile to head off more messages or being quite so negative. And where would you draw the line? Is being asked to "be polite" off-putting if you consider yourself a polite man? It's like being punished for others' bad behaviour.
I don't know the answers to you questions I'm afraid and I think it's veering off from the original point such as a woman with no avatar complaining about men with no avatar - which is the kind of thing I was referring too.
Like my original statement- I honestly couldn't care less what people do with their profiles. "Sure. This thread brought up interesting things I thought but no worries. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it?
Simply that if more men had a bit more self respect and didn't attempt to jump through the more ridiculous (hypocritical) demands on some profiles in a vain attempt to get laid, the more power they would have themselves.
I'm not saying it's a battle of the sexes, or preferences, it just seems absurd to me that people would attempt to do so in order to try and get some attention.
Each to their own though.
Thank you, Lib. I'd agree it's not a battle of the sexes but certainly I would describe it as a battle of perspectives. Men may see the requests women put in their profiles/statuses as ridiculous demands (hypocritical even from this OP). Women may see that they have no choice to add requests or state what they will block/delete. Because they're responding to the number of messages they get from men. Which are at times rude, entitled or abusive. Or just plain monotonous or lazy. Eg "How's you" x35.
It's tricky.
And that's great for them. I'm not complaining. I just wouldn't participate personally.
Of course. Although I do find the topic of requests to "messagers" quite an interesting one. I can't say I enjoy constantly rewriting my profile to head off more messages or being quite so negative. And where would you draw the line? Is being asked to "be polite" off-putting if you consider yourself a polite man? It's like being punished for others' bad behaviour.
I don't know the answers to you questions I'm afraid and I think it's veering off from the original point such as a woman with no avatar complaining about men with no avatar - which is the kind of thing I was referring too.
Like my original statement- I honestly couldn't care less what people do with their profiles.
I think the woman does have an avatar!"I do!!! You can clearly see it!!!! But even if I didn’t, it’s none of OP’s business! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"These posts are great to know who to block on Fab!" Aren’t they just! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it?
Simply that if more men had a bit more self respect and didn't attempt to jump through the more ridiculous (hypocritical) demands on some profiles in a vain attempt to get laid, the more power they would have themselves.
I'm not saying it's a battle of the sexes, or preferences, it just seems absurd to me that people would attempt to do so in order to try and get some attention.
Each to their own though.
Thank you, Lib. I'd agree it's not a battle of the sexes but certainly I would describe it as a battle of perspectives. Men may see the requests women put in their profiles/statuses as ridiculous demands (hypocritical even from this OP). Women may see that they have no choice to add requests or state what they will block/delete. Because they're responding to the number of messages they get from men. Which are at times rude, entitled or abusive. Or just plain monotonous or lazy. Eg "How's you" x35.
It's tricky.
And that's great for them. I'm not complaining. I just wouldn't participate personally.
Of course. Although I do find the topic of requests to "messagers" quite an interesting one. I can't say I enjoy constantly rewriting my profile to head off more messages or being quite so negative. And where would you draw the line? Is being asked to "be polite" off-putting if you consider yourself a polite man? It's like being punished for others' bad behaviour.
I don't know the answers to you questions I'm afraid and I think it's veering off from the original point such as a woman with no avatar complaining about men with no avatar - which is the kind of thing I was referring too.
Like my original statement- I honestly couldn't care less what people do with their profiles.
I think the woman does have an avatar!
I do!!! You can clearly see it!!!! But even if I didn’t, it’s none of OP’s business! "Just thought the original question was pretty simple...guess I was wrong | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it?
Simply that if more men had a bit more self respect and didn't attempt to jump through the more ridiculous (hypocritical) demands on some profiles in a vain attempt to get laid, the more power they would have themselves.
I'm not saying it's a battle of the sexes, or preferences, it just seems absurd to me that people would attempt to do so in order to try and get some attention.
Each to their own though.
Thank you, Lib. I'd agree it's not a battle of the sexes but certainly I would describe it as a battle of perspectives. Men may see the requests women put in their profiles/statuses as ridiculous demands (hypocritical even from this OP). Women may see that they have no choice to add requests or state what they will block/delete. Because they're responding to the number of messages they get from men. Which are at times rude, entitled or abusive. Or just plain monotonous or lazy. Eg "How's you" x35.
It's tricky.
And that's great for them. I'm not complaining. I just wouldn't participate personally.
Of course. Although I do find the topic of requests to "messagers" quite an interesting one. I can't say I enjoy constantly rewriting my profile to head off more messages or being quite so negative. And where would you draw the line? Is being asked to "be polite" off-putting if you consider yourself a polite man? It's like being punished for others' bad behaviour.
I don't know the answers to you questions I'm afraid and I think it's veering off from the original point such as a woman with no avatar complaining about men with no avatar - which is the kind of thing I was referring too.
Like my original statement- I honestly couldn't care less what people do with their profiles.
I think the woman does have an avatar!
I do!!! You can clearly see it!!!! But even if I didn’t, it’s none of OP’s business! "
Like I had any idea he was complaining about you!
Thought he was just having a general whinge. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The thing is OP, women can do whatever the fuck they like, they don’t need to answer to you or any man on here, they’re in the box seats, suck it up and move on. I don't accept that - If more men had spines this would be less of an issue. What does this mean? Simply speaking I think it means that if men ignored the ratio and actually posted their true feelings rather than their "I hope this gets me Forum credits with any women or possibly even a shag feelings" then women would realise men won't shag anything going, but I might be wrong! I would like to understand as the dynamics on this site are a little..opaque tbh. Perhaps I haven't been here long enough. Could Lib explain as he said it?
Simply that if more men had a bit more self respect and didn't attempt to jump through the more ridiculous (hypocritical) demands on some profiles in a vain attempt to get laid, the more power they would have themselves.
I'm not saying it's a battle of the sexes, or preferences, it just seems absurd to me that people would attempt to do so in order to try and get some attention.
Each to their own though.
Thank you, Lib. I'd agree it's not a battle of the sexes but certainly I would describe it as a battle of perspectives. Men may see the requests women put in their profiles/statuses as ridiculous demands (hypocritical even from this OP). Women may see that they have no choice to add requests or state what they will block/delete. Because they're responding to the number of messages they get from men. Which are at times rude, entitled or abusive. Or just plain monotonous or lazy. Eg "How's you" x35.
It's tricky.
And that's great for them. I'm not complaining. I just wouldn't participate personally.
Of course. Although I do find the topic of requests to "messagers" quite an interesting one. I can't say I enjoy constantly rewriting my profile to head off more messages or being quite so negative. And where would you draw the line? Is being asked to "be polite" off-putting if you consider yourself a polite man? It's like being punished for others' bad behaviour.
I don't know the answers to you questions I'm afraid and I think it's veering off from the original point such as a woman with no avatar complaining about men with no avatar - which is the kind of thing I was referring too.
Like my original statement- I honestly couldn't care less what people do with their profiles.
I think the woman does have an avatar!
I do!!! You can clearly see it!!!! But even if I didn’t, it’s none of OP’s business!
Like I had any idea he was complaining about you!
Thought he was just having a general whinge."Same! I’m genuinely shocked! I’ve never even spoken to the guy and now he’s whinging about my profile like it’s any of his business! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
Oh Christ. Just when I thought this couldn't get worse.
And there was someone defending you, as they think we're attacking you for having a difference in opinion.
And actually YOU were the one attacking someone else!
Oooo um is this hypocrisy or double standards OP??? I'll let you have an opinion on that one.
I’ve never even spoken to OP!! No idea why he’s attacking me! "Because he's annoyed he couldn't message you, as his profile is going against what you want. So that's your problem and not his.
I could tell straight away this wasn't a light hearted debate like he was making out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
Oh Christ. Just when I thought this couldn't get worse.
And there was someone defending you, as they think we're attacking you for having a difference in opinion.
And actually YOU were the one attacking someone else!
Oooo um is this hypocrisy or double standards OP??? I'll let you have an opinion on that one.
I’ve never even spoken to OP!! No idea why he’s attacking me!
Because he's annoyed he couldn't message you, as his profile is going against what you want. So that's your problem and not his.
I could tell straight away this wasn't a light hearted debate like he was making out. "Calling you obtuse as well, such a gent | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
Oh Christ. Just when I thought this couldn't get worse.
And there was someone defending you, as they think we're attacking you for having a difference in opinion.
And actually YOU were the one attacking someone else!
Oooo um is this hypocrisy or double standards OP??? I'll let you have an opinion on that one.
I’ve never even spoken to OP!! No idea why he’s attacking me!
Because he's annoyed he couldn't message you, as his profile is going against what you want. So that's your problem and not his.
I could tell straight away this wasn't a light hearted debate like he was making out. "I knew he was bitter about something but I just thought someone had declined his offer of a meet and this was a revenge/whinge post, never considered it was about me. We’ve never even interacted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"These posts are great to know who to block on Fab! Aren’t they just!" You look nice though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"*slowly walks backwards out of the room*" Picturing the homer meme walking backwards into a bush | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
Oh Christ. Just when I thought this couldn't get worse.
And there was someone defending you, as they think we're attacking you for having a difference in opinion.
And actually YOU were the one attacking someone else!
Oooo um is this hypocrisy or double standards OP??? I'll let you have an opinion on that one.
I’ve never even spoken to OP!! No idea why he’s attacking me!
Because he's annoyed he couldn't message you, as his profile is going against what you want. So that's your problem and not his.
I could tell straight away this wasn't a light hearted debate like he was making out.
I knew he was bitter about something but I just thought someone had declined his offer of a meet and this was a revenge/whinge post, never considered it was about me. We’ve never even interacted."Out of curiosity. Is this thread worse than being asked if you have a specific job? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
Oh Christ. Just when I thought this couldn't get worse.
And there was someone defending you, as they think we're attacking you for having a difference in opinion.
And actually YOU were the one attacking someone else!
Oooo um is this hypocrisy or double standards OP??? I'll let you have an opinion on that one.
I’ve never even spoken to OP!! No idea why he’s attacking me!
Because he's annoyed he couldn't message you, as his profile is going against what you want. So that's your problem and not his.
I could tell straight away this wasn't a light hearted debate like he was making out.
I knew he was bitter about something but I just thought someone had declined his offer of a meet and this was a revenge/whinge post, never considered it was about me. We’ve never even interacted.
Out of curiosity. Is this thread worse than being asked if you have a specific job? "Oh yeah!!! I’m not sure what’s going on here but I’m starting to get a complex!  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread? "This is the bit where he really fucked up, let’s see that again in slow motion! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
Oh Christ. Just when I thought this couldn't get worse.
And there was someone defending you, as they think we're attacking you for having a difference in opinion.
And actually YOU were the one attacking someone else!
Oooo um is this hypocrisy or double standards OP??? I'll let you have an opinion on that one.
I’ve never even spoken to OP!! No idea why he’s attacking me!
Because he's annoyed he couldn't message you, as his profile is going against what you want. So that's your problem and not his.
I could tell straight away this wasn't a light hearted debate like he was making out.
Calling you obtuse as well, such a gent "I really hate that word too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ooer I guess you realise you was part of the reason for this thread?
This is the bit where he really fucked up, let’s see that again in slow motion! "Hahaha that did make me laugh | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"*slowly walks backwards out of the room* Picturing the homer meme walking backwards into a bush " I really wish we could post gifs here but it eould be an even bigger shitshow than it is now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"*slowly walks backwards out of the room* Picturing the homer meme walking backwards into a bush I really wish we could post gifs here but it eould be an even bigger shitshow than it is now." I've got too many Will Ferrell ones | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"*slowly walks backwards out of the room* Picturing the homer meme walking backwards into a bush I really wish we could post gifs here but it eould be an even bigger shitshow than it is now." It would be SO good to have GIFs. I have a good one for this thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wonder how many have blocked the OP now "Or sending cock pics... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wonder how many have blocked the OP now "*raises hand | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wonder how many have blocked the OP now
*raises hand "Never saw that coming! Im down a pony. Had just bet the mrs you were on the m62 on route to the Yorkshire coast intent on giving a blowjob! This place is so fickle! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wonder how many have blocked the OP now
*raises hand
Never saw that coming! Im down a pony. Had just bet the mrs you were on the m62 on route to the Yorkshire coast intent on giving a blowjob! This place is so fickle!
"Just kidding aren’t I, I didn’t even have time to get clean knickers on before I jumped in the car | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wonder how many have blocked the OP now "Me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wonder how many have blocked the OP now
*raises hand
Never saw that coming! Im down a pony. Had just bet the mrs you were on the m62 on route to the Yorkshire coast intent on giving a blowjob! This place is so fickle!
Just kidding aren’t I, I didn’t even have time to get clean knickers on before I jumped in the car "Of all the profiles that could have actually pissed on the OPs chips for false advertising I have no idea why he’s singled out yours… the only thing that springs to mind is unattainable. Great profile. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wonder how many have blocked the OP now
*raises hand
Never saw that coming! Im down a pony. Had just bet the mrs you were on the m62 on route to the Yorkshire coast intent on giving a blowjob! This place is so fickle!
Just kidding aren’t I, I didn’t even have time to get clean knickers on before I jumped in the car
Of all the profiles that could have actually pissed on the OPs chips for false advertising I have no idea why he’s singled out yours… the only thing that springs to mind is unattainable. Great profile. "Thankyou, that’s very kind
I have no idea either, I’m shocked | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wonder how many have blocked the OP now
*raises hand
Never saw that coming! Im down a pony. Had just bet the mrs you were on the m62 on route to the Yorkshire coast intent on giving a blowjob! This place is so fickle!
Just kidding aren’t I, I didn’t even have time to get clean knickers on before I jumped in the car
Of all the profiles that could have actually pissed on the OPs chips for false advertising I have no idea why he’s singled out yours… the only thing that springs to mind is unattainable. Great profile.
Thankyou, that’s very kind
I have no idea either, I’m shocked "Think it’s safe to say he’s on his own with his views and green arrow will always assist in other ‘thoughts’ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Am I allowed to ask for intelligent men only?" oxymoron. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Which do you think Fabsters? 1) A thread poster said avatar pictures should be compulsory but theirs had their faces covered with filter masks 2) A women thread poster complained and said she'd block men with cock pics yet had numerous boob and pussy pics 3) A women's profile states that she'd automatically delete messages from men with silhouette avatars and block them yet hers just shows her boobs Have you come across this sort of thing?" Everyone is absolutely definitely free to do what they want, providing I agree. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why do some people feel the need to launch into attack mode when posting? I’m a Forum lurker and I’ve noticed some regular posters who do this throughout many threads. This is a prime example here. The OP asked for opinions and gave his and what he got from some regular posters is attack for his opinion and accusations about how people aren’t answerable to him for posting the profile they choose to. Was that even relevant to his question? He made no mention at all about people needing to post a profile according to his preference. He merely asked for opinions about hypocrisy and double standards. There is a difference between stating your opinion that is relevant to the thread and attacking someone for theirs by simply asking a question. Being a regular poster here does not make anyone’s opinion more valid or give them the right to pass judgement through attack." Welcome to the forums. You make a valid point. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is great, I’ve never been the subject of a thread before, especially as I only use this for the forums and I’ve never received messages from the OP but I must say, I’m very flattered m
FYI, I can run my profile exactly as I please, but thanks for the thread.
But obviously you block! "And? So do lots of people so not sure why you’ve singled me out but I think it’s a really shitty move. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wonder how many have blocked the OP now
*raises hand "Doesn't the ratio help so much! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Am I allowed to ask for intelligent men only?oxymoron. " Is that like a moron in gravy? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is great, I’ve never been the subject of a thread before, especially as I only use this for the forums and I’ve never received messages from the OP but I must say, I’m very flattered m
FYI, I can run my profile exactly as I please, but thanks for the thread.
But obviously you block! "And you can’t use the forum to get round that block. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is great, I’ve never been the subject of a thread before, especially as I only use this for the forums and I’ve never received messages from the OP but I must say, I’m very flattered m
FYI, I can run my profile exactly as I please, but thanks for the thread.
But obviously you block!
And you can’t use the forum to get round that block. "I must certainly don't use the forum to get round anything, if you don't mind saying, a typical female response! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm reminiscing about yesterday's, what's your favourite dinosaur thread." Ahhh the good old days  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is great, I’ve never been the subject of a thread before, especially as I only use this for the forums and I’ve never received messages from the OP but I must say, I’m very flattered m
FYI, I can run my profile exactly as I please, but thanks for the thread.
But obviously you block! "OP, it's against Forum rules to make personal attacks and to get round blocks in threads. You'd do yourself a favour by asking Admin to delete this thread. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is great, I’ve never been the subject of a thread before, especially as I only use this for the forums and I’ve never received messages from the OP but I must say, I’m very flattered m
FYI, I can run my profile exactly as I please, but thanks for the thread.
But obviously you block! "You seem peeved about something. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is great, I’ve never been the subject of a thread before, especially as I only use this for the forums and I’ve never received messages from the OP but I must say, I’m very flattered m
FYI, I can run my profile exactly as I please, but thanks for the thread.
But obviously you block!
And you can’t use the forum to get round that block.
I must certainly don't use the forum to get round anything, if you don't mind saying, a typical female response!"Why wouldn’t she block you after this? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is great, I’ve never been the subject of a thread before, especially as I only use this for the forums and I’ve never received messages from the OP but I must say, I’m very flattered m
FYI, I can run my profile exactly as I please, but thanks for the thread.
But obviously you block!
And you can’t use the forum to get round that block.
I must certainly don't use the forum to get round anything, if you don't mind saying, a typical female response!"You're the typical angry old man baby but hey ho. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
