 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
if you got money and can lobby an mp to get a hearing in parliament you can start a motion to get a vote to change the law.
rich+ lots of empty properties then add squatters. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
I actually feel that the amount of empty properties lying around is more immoral when people dont have a home. If they done something about THAT then we wouldnt have a "squatter" problem  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
"I actually feel that the amount of empty properties lying around is more immoral when people dont have a home. If they done something about THAT then we wouldnt have a "squatter" problem "
You then face the "it's my property and I will do what I like with it" crew.
If you think that squatting is equivalent to theft then it is immoral. If you think that leaving people homeless is wrong then it may not be. Just as throwing food away has become a moral issue for many. Those with plenty have a different view to those with plenty of nothing. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I know of a building that was council owned and derelict in Hackney. It wass squatted for several years. The garden was kept tidy, the building was improved and as well as homing numerous people the building became a bit of a drop in/community centre.
And then they were evicted at considerable expense. The building is empty and boarded up and the council pay a private security firm to look after it.
Can anyone tell me the logic in that?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
All because a house is empty does not mean it dont belong to someone, and wether i live in a house i own or not i dont feel some random stranger has the rights to decide to move in just because im not living there |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I know of a building that was council owned and derelict in Hackney. It wass squatted for several years. The garden was kept tidy, the building was improved and as well as homing numerous people the building became a bit of a drop in/community centre.
And then they were evicted at considerable expense. The building is empty and boarded up and the council pay a private security firm to look after it.
Can anyone tell me the logic in that?
"
yeah the logic is you cant just move into a building that does not belong to you
If you owned a house that was stood empty would you be ok with someone just moving in and living there rent free so long as they kept the garden tidy 
All because its a council property does not mean its any more ok to do it than someones house |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
i feel bad for homeless people i really do but if a sqatter/group of sqatters moved into a house i owned i would b pretty pissed with them just cos somethin is empty doesnt mean u can claim it!!! and most sqats r vandilised and full of used syringes and other drug using equiptment!! would u want this down ur street?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All because a house is empty does not mean it dont belong to someone, and wether i live in a house i own or not i dont feel some random stranger has the rights to decide to move in just because im not living there "
(and I've been homeless!) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Property is theft.
If you own your residence then you are wealthy within measure. Owning two properties in the most severe housing crisis since the first world war is imoral. People are entitled by English Civil Law to occupy uninhabited properties, the removal of this right is a travesty akin to the Enclosure Acts and shows the Liberal Party in their true light (I dont feel they have a right to clain the Title of 'Democrat' when they regress to their whig roots).
Time for Civil Disobedience once again.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I've delt with squatters personally and some of them multipl times not had one that hasn't broke in and not caused damage and usually aggressive thinking they have a right to someone eles house
I think new rules should have been in years ago
Squatters rights they shouldn't have any |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago
(She/ her) in Sensualityland |
I empathise deeply with homeless people and I feel that given certain circumstances anyone of us could potentially be in that situation. However, I do not believe it gives anybody the right to take over somebody else's property. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I empathise deeply with homeless people and I feel that given certain circumstances anyone of us could potentially be in that situation. However, I do not believe it gives anybody the right to take over somebody else's property. "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Property is Theft
Worst thing since the Enclosure Acts
Back to the Whig Party
Too much historical context
Sleepwalking
Radiohead song
Falling
falling
..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
