FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Improvement to FAB
Improvement to FAB
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Do you think a reliability score needs to be introduced?
There should be a check box to say your meeting someone and date of meeting (this is not shown publicly) then 24 hours later after meet there should be four options (all private again)
- met the person
- didn’t meet but rearranged (add new date)
- didn’t meet (there was communication)
- let down (no communication)
Then a score (out of 4) would be displayed publicly on reliability of the person in question…
What do you think? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No
Why not? I think it would help make FAB better and out the jokers"
I don’t like to be reviewed or rated in any form. People would abuse it.
There would be an option not to show it so if it’s negative then people wouldn’t show it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ost SockMan
over a year ago
West Wales and Cardiff |
"Do you think a reliability score needs to be introduced?
There should be a check box to say your meeting someone and date of meeting (this is not shown publicly) then 24 hours later after meet there should be four options (all private again)
- met the person
- didn’t meet but rearranged (add new date)
- didn’t meet (there was communication)
- let down (no communication)
Then a score (out of 4) would be displayed publicly on reliability of the person in question…
What do you think? "
Open to way too much abuse by people with ulterior motives for making life hard for someone.
There’d be endless - “I did message”, “no you didn’t” stuff for the mods too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I don’t think it would make any difference to the peeps that choose to show up or not show up..... they’d have the option to show this and wouldn’t..... I don’t show verifications as I don’t like them that’s my choice..... and when given the choose who would publish this? Xxxx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Fab already provides a mechanism for no shows, you can use the 'report them' link from their profile where one of the options for reporting "didnt show up" 
Not 100% what the outcome of reporting is though, whether they get a short term ban or anything. Anyone know? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No
Why not? I think it would help make FAB better and out the jokers"
Plenty of people find other ways to out the fake profiles by using a mix of common sense, due diligence and gut feeling.
If something seems to good to be true it quite possibly is.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Do you think a reliability score needs to be introduced?
There should be a check box to say your meeting someone and date of meeting (this is not shown publicly) then 24 hours later after meet there should be four options (all private again)
- met the person
- didn’t meet but rearranged (add new date)
- didn’t meet (there was communication)
- let down (no communication)
Then a score (out of 4) would be displayed publicly on reliability of the person in question…
What do you think? "
It would be abused and people be victimised.
Make your own minds up - you’re adults. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No
Why not? I think it would help make FAB better and out the jokers
I don’t like to be reviewed or rated in any form. People would abuse it.
There would be an option not to show it so if it’s negative then people wouldn’t show it. "
I rate you highly. Especially with old fashioned clocks that you’re gran had. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No
Why not? I think it would help make FAB better and out the jokers
I don’t like to be reviewed or rated in any form. People would abuse it.
There would be an option not to show it so if it’s negative then people wouldn’t show it.
I rate you highly. Especially with old fashioned clocks that you’re gran had. "
 . They’re not on show. They’re in the loft lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Fab already provides a mechanism for no shows, you can use the 'report them' link from their profile where one of the options for reporting "didnt show up"
Not 100% what the outcome of reporting is though, whether they get a short term ban or anything. Anyone know?"
Really? That’s interesting to know, could it be improved and people warned that repeated reporting of their profile will involve a ban. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ea monkeyMan
over a year ago
Manchester (he/him) |
There is the verification system for proving that a person is genuine and to provide feedback.
I do tend to agree that there should be an effective way of policing other users on fab, to protect people and to flag up potential threats but what that looks like without being abused, is something that I’m unsure about.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *reya73Woman
over a year ago
Whitley Bay |
Lately someone updated their status absolutely slating me simply because I declined their offer. Imagine how a rate score would be abused. Some people on here are not very nice. It's not trip advisor! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Lately someone updated their status absolutely slating me simply because I declined their offer. Imagine how a rate score would be abused. Some people on here are not very nice. It's not trip advisor! "
That’s crap they did that…they should be banned for life for doing that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
A rating system will be gamed. They always are. Leave it as it is, though I'd consider making reviews private across the board. I don't need to know what Keith's todger got up to with Margaret. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"There is the verification system for proving that a person is genuine and to provide feedback.
I do tend to agree that there should be an effective way of policing other users on fab, to protect people and to flag up potential threats but what that looks like without being abused, is something that I’m unsure about.
"
That’s the thing…most on here are a genuine bunch, there would be a few that would use and abuse it, it’s working out how to make it abuse proof |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ea monkeyMan
over a year ago
Manchester (he/him) |
"Lately someone updated their status absolutely slating me simply because I declined their offer. Imagine how a rate score would be abused. Some people on here are not very nice. It's not trip advisor! "
That’s horrible!
I hope that you reported them? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"A rating system will be gamed. They always are. Leave it as it is, though I'd consider making reviews private across the board. I don't need to know what Keith's todger got up to with Margaret. "
Could it be an extension of the review system currently in place? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Do you think a reliability score needs to be introduced?
There should be a check box to say your meeting someone and date of meeting (this is not shown publicly) then 24 hours later after meet there should be four options (all private again)
- met the person
- didn’t meet but rearranged (add new date)
- didn’t meet (there was communication)
- let down (no communication)
Then a score (out of 4) would be displayed publicly on reliability of the person in question…
What do you think? "
No.. because in reality nobody has to meet anybody, even if they have had said they would do so.
It is not nice when people ghost and don't turn up ect. But that's the way of the game A system like that would be open to abuse.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ea monkeyMan
over a year ago
Manchester (he/him) |
"There is the verification system for proving that a person is genuine and to provide feedback.
I do tend to agree that there should be an effective way of policing other users on fab, to protect people and to flag up potential threats but what that looks like without being abused, is something that I’m unsure about.
That’s the thing…most on here are a genuine bunch, there would be a few that would use and abuse it, it’s working out how to make it abuse proof"
The verification process is open to abuse, so is the photo verification. People always find work arounds but a system that’s fair for both parties and gave future partners a genuine insight, would be invaluable |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I can see it now
Turned me down one star
Was in her area had 10 minutes to spare seen she was online she wasn’t up for spreading her legs
One star
Wouldn’t meet a blank profile one star
Call her a slut and showed her my cock on my open message she blocked me one star
Can you see how this is going |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I can see it now
Turned me down one star
Was in her area had 10 minutes to spare seen she was online she wasn’t up for spreading her legs
One star
Wouldn’t meet a blank profile one star
Call her a slut and showed her my cock on my open message she blocked me one star
Can you see how this is going "
It would be to design something that stops that kind of abuse…. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I can see it now
Turned me down one star
Was in her area had 10 minutes to spare seen she was online she wasn’t up for spreading her legs
One star
Wouldn’t meet a blank profile one star
Call her a slut and showed her my cock on my open message she blocked me one star
Can you see how this is going
It would be to design something that stops that kind of abuse…."
Nothing can be designed to stop it or in less it was a two way authentication system
Whare both parties need to register with fab that they agree to meet at such and such a time and date before leting you in to the rateing system
And if someone not going to turn up they not going to authenticate it to let the other party in so it will be widel open to abuse like that if it’s a one way system
And they fab would have to inploy a full time staff off adim to go though everyone and delete such things it would be a full time job |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I can see it now
Turned me down one star
Was in her area had 10 minutes to spare seen she was online she wasn’t up for spreading her legs
One star
Wouldn’t meet a blank profile one star
Call her a slut and showed her my cock on my open message she blocked me one star
Can you see how this is going
It would be to design something that stops that kind of abuse….
Nothing can be designed to stop it or in less it was a two way authentication system
Whare both parties need to register with fab that they agree to meet at such and such a time and date before leting you in to the rateing system
And if someone not going to turn up they not going to authenticate it to let the other party in so it will be widel open to abuse like that if it’s a one way system
And they fab would have to inploy a full time staff off adim to go though everyone and delete such things it would be a full time job "
There are algorithms that can take the heat out of that…you could have staff look at disputes to the ratings. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I can see it now
Turned me down one star
Was in her area had 10 minutes to spare seen she was online she wasn’t up for spreading her legs
One star
Wouldn’t meet a blank profile one star
Call her a slut and showed her my cock on my open message she blocked me one star
Can you see how this is going
It would be to design something that stops that kind of abuse….
Nothing can be designed to stop it or in less it was a two way authentication system
Whare both parties need to register with fab that they agree to meet at such and such a time and date before leting you in to the rateing system
And if someone not going to turn up they not going to authenticate it to let the other party in so it will be widel open to abuse like that if it’s a one way system
And they fab would have to inploy a full time staff off adim to go though everyone and delete such things it would be a full time job
There are algorithms that can take the heat out of that…you could have staff look at disputes to the ratings."
How much time do you think the staff have got? They're all volunteers who do moderation in their spare time, Fab would have to start employing an army to go through all the disputes that would get raised.
There's no perfect system, no magic bullet. Like it or not everyone just has to use their own common sense when it comes to messaging, geting a feel for people, then meeting and getting another feel from them  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I can see it now
Turned me down one star
Was in her area had 10 minutes to spare seen she was online she wasn’t up for spreading her legs
One star
Wouldn’t meet a blank profile one star
Call her a slut and showed her my cock on my open message she blocked me one star
Can you see how this is going
It would be to design something that stops that kind of abuse….
Nothing can be designed to stop it or in less it was a two way authentication system
Whare both parties need to register with fab that they agree to meet at such and such a time and date before leting you in to the rateing system
And if someone not going to turn up they not going to authenticate it to let the other party in so it will be widel open to abuse like that if it’s a one way system
And they fab would have to inploy a full time staff off adim to go though everyone and delete such things it would be a full time job
There are algorithms that can take the heat out of that…you could have staff look at disputes to the ratings."
YouTube spent over 100 million on a new ad algorithm that’s ment to stop ad blocker it got cracked in 5 minutes flat YouTube basically set fire to 100 million dollars what chance has fab got
So you implant a world algorithm
So here we go it’s looking for key world
Wouldn’t F m.E O.fF MY blank pr.profile O.ne s t a r
algorithm World algorithm defeated user need to repot it to admin and have them remove it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Way too open to abuse.
"
This, it would have to be something that both parties would have to agree on before a meet to work. Otherwise it would simply be open to abuse. And those who have no intention on meeting wouldn't agree to it in the first place. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Sounds like trip advisor. Not sure I wanted to be rated like a restaurant thanks.
I was just about to put that
It would be handy to know which fab people are clean enough to eat at "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
