FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Picky Women
Picky Women
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." Agreed. A lot of men are picky too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." Me neither.. its just another excuse they add to there tiny violin  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." Because they are fucking idiots... Thirsty idiots! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." Agreed .. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just playing forum bingo, just waiting for someone to turn up and it will be a full house. " How do? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky. Me neither.. its just another excuse they add to there tiny violin " Fixed it! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"These women be talking like men are collective unit, instead of individual hoomans." Haha. To be fair some men are quite choosy. I prefer those men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky. Me neither.. its just another excuse they add to there tiny violin
Fixed it!"Love it x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ? " I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ? I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters " I couldn’t have sex with someone I wasn’t attracted to physically. No matter how decent they were. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Men get over excited They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything. We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called. " They? Men? Could you possibly - just in the interests of being polite - not refer to all men, as though there were no exceptions to your self-made “rule”. Otherwise, ya know, it sounds sexist as f**k. Thanks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow the man bashing is strong today" You noticed too ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ? I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters I couldn’t have sex with someone I wasn’t attracted to physically. No matter how decent they were. " But looks are subjective so i doubt you have fancied everyone you have had sex with. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Men get over excited They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything. We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called. They? Men? Could you possibly - just in the interests of being polite - not refer to all men, as though there were no exceptions to your self-made “rule”. Otherwise, ya know, it sounds sexist as f**k. Thanks " He’s right to be fair | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ? I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters I couldn’t have sex with someone I wasn’t attracted to physically. No matter how decent they were. But looks are subjective so i doubt you have fancied everyone you have had sex with. " That sentence doesn’t make sense at all to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
.
.
.
.
.
It wasn’t me, was it? Sorry City  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow the man bashing is strong today" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"BINGO I’m here
.
.
.
.
.
It wasn’t me, was it? Sorry City "Nope, I haven’t shouted house yet!  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ? I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters I couldn’t have sex with someone I wasn’t attracted to physically. No matter how decent they were. But looks are subjective so i doubt you have fancied everyone you have had sex with. That sentence doesn’t make sense at all to me. " Looks are subjective so yes I have fancied everyone I’ve had sex with 100%. Would have made more sense if you’d have said looks are subjective so I doubt someone else would fancy everyone I’ve had sex with. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Picky is another word so selective. I would think most people are selective. And therefore picky. " There you go sir got it in one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." Picky = A person’s preferences surely? At least no one gave me a free fuck coupon when I joined that I could cash in to whomever I wanted! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow the man bashing is strong today You noticed too ?" Is there a mallet emoji?! *Mallet bashing man emoji* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just playing forum bingo, just waiting for someone to turn up and it will be a full house. " What do we win? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just playing forum bingo, just waiting for someone to turn up and it will be a full house. What do we win?" A mallet, apparently | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." …… It is not picky to have standards and preferences - I’ve seen too many male profiles that clearly appear to have neither Just because someone does have preferences it doesn’t mean that it is set in stone, they can be changed for the right person. For the wrong person it becomes easier to say to them that if they bothered their arse to read my preferences before they initiated contact they’d have known they were wasting their time. My preferences are clearly written on my profile I wish men would too - they sadly seem to have a huge net and just trawl the site for anything they can get rather that target something specific Anyone who understands marketing knows that’s not going to get them anywhere except nowhere - Feisty Lady | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." exactly!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Men get over excited They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything. We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called. " What would be a good name for a charitable hooker service? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just playing forum bingo, just waiting for someone to turn up and it will be a full house. What do we win? A mallet, apparently " Gimme it I’m gonna go proper man bashing  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Men get over excited They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything. We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called. What would be a good name for a charitable hooker service?" Free Fuckz  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Men get over excited They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything. We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called. What would be a good name for a charitable hooker service?" Altruistic Escorts - “We Give a Fuck” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m just playing forum bingo, just waiting for someone to turn up and it will be a full house. What do we win? A mallet, apparently " Ah that figures.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Picky woman and proud. Ive been called 'stuck up' and 'hard work' for expecting some rapport before deciding on a meet. Thats a delete. Im more aroused by mental than visual stimulation so chiselled abs or gym bod can only get someone so far. Id make no apologies or have any regrets for that. As my early Fabguru advised 'You do you Boo' "On point, she is (Yoda Style) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Men get over excited They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything. We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called. What would be a good name for a charitable hooker service? Altruistic Escorts - “We Give a Fuck” " Brilliant! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." Then women are so picky they’re not even happy when the standby cock turns up instead of the original  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky. Then women are so picky they’re not even happy when the standby cock turns up instead of the original " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"These women be talking like men are collective unit, instead of individual hoomans." I was referring to the specific group of men that the OP was referring to | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ? I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters " Being attracted to someone is not the same as being judgemental about looks... Unfortunately too many don't understand this!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ? I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters Being attracted to someone is not the same as being judgemental about looks... Unfortunately too many don't understand this!! " It’s quite scary and unbelievable how many don’t! Surely that’s just a given. Common knowledge, logic! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." Maybe some people the term picky when they actually mean preferences We all have the right, men and women | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky. Then women are so picky they’re not even happy when the standby cock turns up instead of the original "
It's like a bloody tombola  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ? I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters Being attracted to someone is not the same as being judgemental about looks... Unfortunately too many don't understand this!! It’s quite scary and unbelievable how many don’t! Surely that’s just a given. Common knowledge, logic!" Seriously... If I don't fancy someone enough to want to fuck them, do they really just assume that they must be ugly... Or even that I think they are... I don't fucking fancy Brad Pitt ffs! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ? I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters Being attracted to someone is not the same as being judgemental about looks... Unfortunately too many don't understand this!! It’s quite scary and unbelievable how many don’t! Surely that’s just a given. Common knowledge, logic! Seriously... If I don't fancy someone enough to want to fuck them, do they really just assume that they must be ugly... Or even that I think they are... I don't fucking fancy Brad Pitt ffs! " Me neither. Or George Clooney! I never seem to go for the ones other people think are “perfect looking” anyway. I have a unique taste. Also if I don’t fancy someone nothing will be happening either even if they have the best personality in the world. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." Unfortunately some people think that just because users are on the site, they are gagging for it and will shag anyone. I dread to think what messages women receive as some of the messages I get (sorry, demands) are ridiculous. Couples are especially problematic in my experience. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky. Me neither.. its just another excuse they add to there tiny violin "Suck my tiny violin!  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I hate when people say I’m picky/choosy etc. I just know what I want and what I don’t want. Nothing to do with standards and being picky. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion." Nah that’s crap. I only meet who I think are 10/10. And wouldn’t matter how many or how little men there are here I still wouldn’t meet them. Ratio means shit to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion. Nah that’s crap. I only meet who I think are 10/10. And wouldn’t matter how many or how little men there are here I still wouldn’t meet them. Ratio means shit to me. " It still applies though, the bigger the pool of people, the more 10/10 people there will be, eventually you’ll hit a point where you won’t meet some of the 10/10 people because the pool is too big. Remember, a 10/10 is a 10/10 stood alone. But if there’s 100 10/10 guys stood around him? He might not be in your radar anymore | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion. Nah that’s crap. I only meet who I think are 10/10. And wouldn’t matter how many or how little men there are here I still wouldn’t meet them. Ratio means shit to me. It still applies though, the bigger the pool of people, the more 10/10 people there will be, eventually you’ll hit a point where you won’t meet some of the 10/10 people because the pool is too big. Remember, a 10/10 is a 10/10 stood alone. But if there’s 100 10/10 guys stood around him? He might not be in your radar anymore " Nope. You’ve lost me now  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion. Nah that’s crap. I only meet who I think are 10/10. And wouldn’t matter how many or how little men there are here I still wouldn’t meet them. Ratio means shit to me. It still applies though, the bigger the pool of people, the more 10/10 people there will be, eventually you’ll hit a point where you won’t meet some of the 10/10 people because the pool is too big. Remember, a 10/10 is a 10/10 stood alone. But if there’s 100 10/10 guys stood around him? He might not be in your radar anymore Nope. You’ve lost me now "It’s just maths. Nothing complicated to it. As the pool size increases, individual chances of meeting decrease. And there’s nothing wrong with that, you’re acting defensive like it’s a fault about you. It’s not. It’s just what happens when you have large pools of men that massively out number the women | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion." This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion. This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite! " Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this? It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion. Nah that’s crap. I only meet who I think are 10/10. And wouldn’t matter how many or how little men there are here I still wouldn’t meet them. Ratio means shit to me. It still applies though, the bigger the pool of people, the more 10/10 people there will be, eventually you’ll hit a point where you won’t meet some of the 10/10 people because the pool is too big. Remember, a 10/10 is a 10/10 stood alone. But if there’s 100 10/10 guys stood around him? He might not be in your radar anymore Nope. You’ve lost me now
It’s just maths. Nothing complicated to it. As the pool size increases, individual chances of meeting decrease. And there’s nothing wrong with that, you’re acting defensive like it’s a fault about you. It’s not. It’s just what happens when you have large pools of men that massively out number the women "Defensive? No. I don’t have faults.
There’s quite a large pool of men on fab now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's a kinder thing to say to someone than "You've got no chance you ugly fuck"." If that's what you think it means then you need to work on that! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion. This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite! Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this? It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys " No! They aren't! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's a kinder thing to say to someone than "You've got no chance you ugly fuck". If that's what you think it means then you need to work on that! "There's always one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's a kinder thing to say to someone than "You've got no chance you ugly fuck". If that's what you think it means then you need to work on that!
There's always one." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion. This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite! Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this? It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys No! They aren't! " Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Now scale that up to 100,000 single guys on here. There’s plenty of guys that would be getting meets, except they’re being pushed out by the sheer size of the pool. You seem really defensive about it. But like I said, I’ve not a knock on anyone, it’s just maths | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion. This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite! Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this? It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys No! They aren't! Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Now scale that up to 100,000 single guys on here. There’s plenty of guys that would be getting meets, except they’re being pushed out by the sheer size of the pool. You seem really defensive about it. But like I said, I’ve not a knock on anyone, it’s just maths " If I liked 2 guys enough to want to fuck them... I would... If there were 20... I would... Alot want now or nowt... Now who is doing someone out of a meet? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion. This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite! Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this? It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys No! They aren't! Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Now scale that up to 100,000 single guys on here. There’s plenty of guys that would be getting meets, except they’re being pushed out by the sheer size of the pool. You seem really defensive about it. But like I said, I’ve not a knock on anyone, it’s just maths If I liked 2 guys enough to want to fuck them... I would... If there were 20... I would... Alot want now or nowt... Now who is doing someone out of a meet? "That might be true for you, but it’s not true for everyone, lots of people don’t meet often, so only the best picks get through. The example still stands, and like I said, it’s not a knock on anyone, it’s just how the game is rigged. But let’s not make a thread and act like it isn’t rigged like that. Guys that would get meets often don’t because of the sheer volume of guys. And I think it’s those ones that get extra butt hurt. It’s been true through out history. With science we’ve found that while 80% of women were able to pass on their genes. Only roughly 20% of guys were. That 80% leaves a lot of butt hurt sexless guys through history | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. " Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion. This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite! Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this? It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys No! They aren't! Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Now scale that up to 100,000 single guys on here. There’s plenty of guys that would be getting meets, except they’re being pushed out by the sheer size of the pool. You seem really defensive about it. But like I said, I’ve not a knock on anyone, it’s just maths If I liked 2 guys enough to want to fuck them... I would... If there were 20... I would... Alot want now or nowt... Now who is doing someone out of a meet?
That might be true for you, but it’s not true for everyone, lots of people don’t meet often, so only the best picks get through.
The example still stands, and like I said, it’s not a knock on anyone, it’s just how the game is rigged. But let’s not make a thread and act like it isn’t rigged like that. Guys that would get meets often don’t because of the sheer volume of guys. And I think it’s those ones that get extra butt hurt.
It’s been true through out history. With science we’ve found that while 80% of women were able to pass on their genes. Only roughly 20% of guys were.
That 80% leaves a lot of butt hurt sexless guys through history "Tbf... I can't be arsed to explain that you are still, somewhat, mistaken... If attraction was the only variable, you would be, more so... But it's not... Alot of things put women off of the men on here... Even the the apparent 10s...I think your theory is too simplistic | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion. This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite! Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this? It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys No! They aren't! Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Now scale that up to 100,000 single guys on here. There’s plenty of guys that would be getting meets, except they’re being pushed out by the sheer size of the pool. You seem really defensive about it. But like I said, I’ve not a knock on anyone, it’s just maths If I liked 2 guys enough to want to fuck them... I would... If there were 20... I would... Alot want now or nowt... Now who is doing someone out of a meet?
That might be true for you, but it’s not true for everyone, lots of people don’t meet often, so only the best picks get through.
The example still stands, and like I said, it’s not a knock on anyone, it’s just how the game is rigged. But let’s not make a thread and act like it isn’t rigged like that. Guys that would get meets often don’t because of the sheer volume of guys. And I think it’s those ones that get extra butt hurt.
It’s been true through out history. With science we’ve found that while 80% of women were able to pass on their genes. Only roughly 20% of guys were.
That 80% leaves a lot of butt hurt sexless guys through history
Tbf... I can't be arsed to explain that you are still, somewhat, mistaken... If attraction was the only variable, you would be, more so... But it's not... Alot of things put women off of the men on here... Even the the apparent 10s...I think your theory is too simplistic "Ok, so I kinda explained... Ah well | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t. " You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here. That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t. You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here. That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse " She's not obtuse. She's just being reflexive *scarpers* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"People miss the point of what they mean by picky They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no. Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective. Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10. If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet. Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10. Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up. This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion. This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite! Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this? It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys No! They aren't! Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Now scale that up to 100,000 single guys on here. There’s plenty of guys that would be getting meets, except they’re being pushed out by the sheer size of the pool. You seem really defensive about it. But like I said, I’ve not a knock on anyone, it’s just maths If I liked 2 guys enough to want to fuck them... I would... If there were 20... I would... Alot want now or nowt... Now who is doing someone out of a meet?
That might be true for you, but it’s not true for everyone, lots of people don’t meet often, so only the best picks get through.
The example still stands, and like I said, it’s not a knock on anyone, it’s just how the game is rigged. But let’s not make a thread and act like it isn’t rigged like that. Guys that would get meets often don’t because of the sheer volume of guys. And I think it’s those ones that get extra butt hurt.
It’s been true through out history. With science we’ve found that while 80% of women were able to pass on their genes. Only roughly 20% of guys were.
That 80% leaves a lot of butt hurt sexless guys through history
Tbf... I can't be arsed to explain that you are still, somewhat, mistaken... If attraction was the only variable, you would be, more so... But it's not... Alot of things put women off of the men on here... Even the the apparent 10s...I think your theory is too simplistic "I’ll take a “can’t be bothered to explain” as an “that’s actually a fair point I don’t want to discuss” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t. You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here. That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse " Did you just learn the word ‘obtuse’ from the Shawshank redemption ?
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t. You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here. That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse Did you just learn the word ‘obtuse’ from the Shawshank redemption ?
"Genuinely did and it’s my fave But yeah my point still stands. In the example I mentioned guy B might fire off the “wow yoir so picky” because he got pushed out of the meet by a more attractive guy. It doesn’t mean her standards dropped, it means the pool size is so big guys that would have got a meet either don’t, or have to wait longer. I just don’t like how we turn this into a “if I wouldn’t fucj you it doesn’t matter either way” discussion because that’s not what’s happening. There are genuinely guys you would fuck had the sample size been smaller. And like I’ve parroted 100x already. It’s not a knock on women. It’s not in defence of guys that send off snotty messages. It’s just the maths behind the site. Guys massively out number the women. It’s just how the game is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t. " This makes more sense | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do I have to climb down from schlong mountain and knock some heads together again? " I like the sound of this mountain! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky. It's not picky at all its discerning...nothing wrong with that. Agreed. A lot of men are picky too. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They say they are fussy, picky, choosy, entitled to their own standard but then pick up an horrid plasticky rubber thingy out of their bedside table "To be fair that plasticky rubbery thing that lives in their draw has more personality that a lot of guys on here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus. But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women. People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT. And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up. Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else. Sorry. I'll get back in my box now." Yeah get back in your box!! Very well said though miss | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They say they are fussy, picky, choosy, entitled to their own standard but then pick up an horrid plasticky rubber thingy out of their bedside table
To be fair that plasticky rubbery thing that lives in their draw has more personality that a lot of guys on here "Lmao...i was thinking just that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus. But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women. People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT. And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up. Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else. Sorry. I'll get back in my box now." Well you kinda prove my point Let’s say there’s 100 guys on here you would meet. So you start meeting then, and around 20 in one of them puts a status saying “fucking hell I can’t get laid” and someone else says “it’s a number game they can be picky” is he wrong? Technically it is a numbers game because as you said, there’s 100 you’d meet so there’s a number element to your chance of getting the meet even if your in that 100 people you still would have to wait. And technically you do have the ability to be extra picky because there’s 100 options, so you choose the best out of those 100 first, and for the guy that get picked last. Well it’s shit luck for him . And no ones in the wrong. It’s just how the numbers work out. The only people here on the wrong are guys sending out shitty messages when they don’t get picked. But let’s not pretend that there isn’t an element of numbers to it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nothing wrong in being picky" I agree as I am myself and would feel alot more special hearing a guy say he is xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t. You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here. That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse Did you just learn the word ‘obtuse’ from the Shawshank redemption ?
Genuinely did and it’s my fave
But yeah my point still stands. In the example I mentioned guy B might fire off the “wow yoir so picky” because he got pushed out of the meet by a more attractive guy.
It doesn’t mean her standards dropped, it means the pool size is so big guys that would have got a meet either don’t, or have to wait longer.
I just don’t like how we turn this into a “if I wouldn’t fucj you it doesn’t matter either way” discussion because that’s not what’s happening. There are genuinely guys you would fuck had the sample size been smaller.
And like I’ve parroted 100x already. It’s not a knock on women. It’s not in defence of guys that send off snotty messages. It’s just the maths behind the site. Guys massively out number the women. It’s just how the game is "Your posts show how little you understand the site or the way that women work. City Jeans nailed the response. The main problem in this thread is that men often assume that most women’s laws of attraction work the same as most men’s, they don’t. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They say they are fussy, picky, choosy, entitled to their own standard but then pick up an horrid plasticky rubber thingy out of their bedside table
To be fair that plasticky rubbery thing that lives in their draw has more personality that a lot of guys on here "I hope you don’t mean that thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus. But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women. People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT. And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up. Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else. Sorry. I'll get back in my box now. Well you kinda prove my point Let’s say there’s 100 guys on here you would meet. So you start meeting then, and around 20 in one of them puts a status saying “fucking hell I can’t get laid” and someone else says “it’s a number game they can be picky” is he wrong? Technically it is a numbers game because as you said, there’s 100 you’d meet so there’s a number element to your chance of getting the meet even if your in that 100 people you still would have to wait. And technically you do have the ability to be extra picky because there’s 100 options, so you choose the best out of those 100 first, and for the guy that get picked last. Well it’s shit luck for him . And no ones in the wrong. It’s just how the numbers work out. The only people here on the wrong are guys sending out shitty messages when they don’t get picked. But let’s not pretend that there isn’t an element of numbers to it " There's zero chance of someone having sex with me if I don't find him attractive. Doesn't matter if he's the only person asking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t. You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here. That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse Did you just learn the word ‘obtuse’ from the Shawshank redemption ?
Genuinely did and it’s my fave
But yeah my point still stands. In the example I mentioned guy B might fire off the “wow yoir so picky” because he got pushed out of the meet by a more attractive guy.
It doesn’t mean her standards dropped, it means the pool size is so big guys that would have got a meet either don’t, or have to wait longer.
I just don’t like how we turn this into a “if I wouldn’t fucj you it doesn’t matter either way” discussion because that’s not what’s happening. There are genuinely guys you would fuck had the sample size been smaller.
And like I’ve parroted 100x already. It’s not a knock on women. It’s not in defence of guys that send off snotty messages. It’s just the maths behind the site. Guys massively out number the women. It’s just how the game is
Your posts show how little you understand the site or the way that women work.
City Jeans nailed the response.
The main problem in this thread is that men often assume that most women’s laws of attraction work the same as most men’s, they don’t. "It’s such a cop out to just say “yeah you don’t get it”. The example to me makes perfect sense, that’s that would normally get a meet are pushed out by hitter guys, the bigger the sample size, the more often that happen. No ones really changed my mind about that, and I’m open to having it change, not no ones actually tried in my opinion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus. But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women. People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT. And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up. Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else. Sorry. I'll get back in my box now. Well you kinda prove my point Let’s say there’s 100 guys on here you would meet. So you start meeting then, and around 20 in one of them puts a status saying “fucking hell I can’t get laid” and someone else says “it’s a number game they can be picky” is he wrong? Technically it is a numbers game because as you said, there’s 100 you’d meet so there’s a number element to your chance of getting the meet even if your in that 100 people you still would have to wait. And technically you do have the ability to be extra picky because there’s 100 options, so you choose the best out of those 100 first, and for the guy that get picked last. Well it’s shit luck for him . And no ones in the wrong. It’s just how the numbers work out. The only people here on the wrong are guys sending out shitty messages when they don’t get picked. But let’s not pretend that there isn’t an element of numbers to it There's zero chance of someone having sex with me if I don't find him attractive. Doesn't matter if he's the only person asking." Obviously? No ones said you would? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both. But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A. There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t. You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here. That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse Did you just learn the word ‘obtuse’ from the Shawshank redemption ?
Genuinely did and it’s my fave
But yeah my point still stands. In the example I mentioned guy B might fire off the “wow yoir so picky” because he got pushed out of the meet by a more attractive guy.
It doesn’t mean her standards dropped, it means the pool size is so big guys that would have got a meet either don’t, or have to wait longer.
I just don’t like how we turn this into a “if I wouldn’t fucj you it doesn’t matter either way” discussion because that’s not what’s happening. There are genuinely guys you would fuck had the sample size been smaller.
And like I’ve parroted 100x already. It’s not a knock on women. It’s not in defence of guys that send off snotty messages. It’s just the maths behind the site. Guys massively out number the women. It’s just how the game is
Your posts show how little you understand the site or the way that women work.
City Jeans nailed the response.
The main problem in this thread is that men often assume that most women’s laws of attraction work the same as most men’s, they don’t. "Perfect. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus. But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women. People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT. And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up. Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else. Sorry. I'll get back in my box now."
I have been accused many times of being too picky, it seems to rankle more that someone they find unattractive says thanks but no thanks. Because I'm fat I ought to be grateful just to be noticed.
Fuck that shit - as long as I have access to my vibe and batteries I'll meet who I want to meet, not just anyone who messages me.
If I was on a site of 10 men and I didn't fancy any of them, Vincent my one-eared rabbit and I will muddle through quite happily before I consider meeting someone I don't fancy because "fuckit, best of a bad lot". 10 men or 10,000 men, it doesn't make a difference to whether I fancy an individual. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus. But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women. People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT. And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up. Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else. Sorry. I'll get back in my box now. Well you kinda prove my point Let’s say there’s 100 guys on here you would meet. So you start meeting then, and around 20 in one of them puts a status saying “fucking hell I can’t get laid” and someone else says “it’s a number game they can be picky” is he wrong? Technically it is a numbers game because as you said, there’s 100 you’d meet so there’s a number element to your chance of getting the meet even if your in that 100 people you still would have to wait. And technically you do have the ability to be extra picky because there’s 100 options, so you choose the best out of those 100 first, and for the guy that get picked last. Well it’s shit luck for him . And no ones in the wrong. It’s just how the numbers work out. The only people here on the wrong are guys sending out shitty messages when they don’t get picked. But let’s not pretend that there isn’t an element of numbers to it " I enjoy how you managed to pick out the parts of my post that back up your argument and completely ignore the parts that don't. Well done you. It isn't a numbers game. It's purely availability. If I want to meet 100 men it's fuck all to do with choosing who to meet first. That comes down to who happens to be right place right time. And I say again, more bluntly this time. Fuck the numbers. If I don't want someone to stick their cock in me I'm not going to have them stick their cock in me. Whether that means I get no sex for years. People can call it picky. People can say it's because I can afford to be picky. But that's crap. I'm fat, I'm not that attractive and I spent the best part of 40 years basically being overlooked a hell of a lot of the time. A lot like a single man on fab actually. No one would have said "she can afford to be picky" despite the fact I was SURROUNDED BY MEN most of the time. But I still didn't take a dicking from someone I didn't particularly want to just because of the numbers. People simplify things far too much on here. At the same time as making them too complicated. And if it makes them feel better to blame it on numbers, rock on. But it's absolutely not the case. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others. So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact." And that is where the numbers come in. But that's not because you're choosing one 8/10 or 9/10 or 10/10 over another, as you say it's purely because you don't get to see them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others. So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact." So that’s why you never reply to me? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others. So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact. So that’s why you never reply to me? "That's entirely the reason | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Men get over excited They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything. We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called. " Exactly this!! Just because I'm here it doesn't mean I want to have sex with YOU. Calm down sugar tits | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others. So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact. And that is where the numbers come in. But that's not because you're choosing one 8/10 or 9/10 or 10/10 over another, as you say it's purely because you don't get to see them." But do you at least understand how it theres 10 guys you’d meet in your inbox, and you pick one, there’s 9 you didn’t pick that day. That’s where the numbers come in. Because if the guy you picked didn’t message, you would have picked one of the other 9. So 9 guys didn’t get a meet that day because of numbers. If the sample size was smaller the guys chance of getting the meet that day increase That’s what we mean by numbers game. Not that your throwing a virtual dart on the “whose near me” part of fabs and fucking whoever it lands on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others. So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact. So that’s why you never reply to me?
That's entirely the reason "Thought so!!! I’ll message you now, keep an eye out for it x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others. So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact." It also means due to a higher pool size, that the chances of a guy being exactly who you are looking for are higher. Flip that around and due to a smaller pool size of women the chances of a man catching the eye of a woman he is attracted to are potentially much lower. The numbers game exists. Women have the advantage and benefit of higher chance of potentially finding a compatible and successful match. They just have to wade through a hell of a lot more shit to find it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others. So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact. So that’s why you never reply to me?
That's entirely the reason
Thought so!!! I’ll message you now, keep an eye out for it x"I can't believe you sent me that, Jesus... I don't even know how you managed to insert it there? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others. So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact. So that’s why you never reply to me?
That's entirely the reason
Thought so!!! I’ll message you now, keep an eye out for it x
I can't believe you sent me that, Jesus... I don't even know how you managed to insert IN there? "You serious?!?!? You said you loved it and can’t wait to try fitting little Tony in again next time I visit you!!! Fixed your type too haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA "Haha will it be teacher assessed though? If so, I insist on useless grade exemplification criteria and a different exam question for each of us, sat in a different way on different days | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others. So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact. So that’s why you never reply to me?
That's entirely the reason
Thought so!!! I’ll message you now, keep an eye out for it x
I can't believe you sent me that, Jesus... I don't even know how you managed to insert it there? "Ahhh I knew there was a reason you hadn’t swooned into my arms all pouty & flustered after reading my poetic sexiness!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA
Haha will it be teacher assessed though? If so, I insist on useless grade exemplification criteria and a different exam question for each of us, sat in a different way on different days "Teacher assessed but internally validated by peers
You can have your criteria and a differentiated set of questions  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA "If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account
Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA
If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account
Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time "Excellent exam question. I'll draft the success criteria now! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA
If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account
Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time "Half the time? Where are you getting your facts from bud? The Sun? 
I get meets, I get offered meets. I turn down meets. If I say I’ll meet someone. I’ve never cancelled or let them down!!!
Yes! Despite how it looks on the forums, I’m picky haha
In a side. It’s, I loved how my phone changed “picky” to “lucky”!!! It knows me so well lol
A | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA
If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account
Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time
Half the time? Where are you getting your facts from bud? The Sun?
I get meets, I get offered meets. I turn down meets. If I say I’ll meet someone. I’ve never cancelled or let them down!!!
Yes! Despite how it looks on the forums, I’m picky haha
In a side. It’s, I loved how my phone changed “picky” to “lucky”!!! It knows me so well lol
A"Haha well your obviously a good one! But I’ve met couples that have had weeks and weeks of planned meets then excuses. I went to an 8 guy gangbang with a hot wife and husband, to be the only guy that turned up! I think one thing guys should take away from this is that women suffer on here too. I know it’s sucks being a single guy and never getting meets, but imagine how frustrating it must be to be a couple constantly getting shitty messages, cancelled on, shit excuses, fakes, liars, creeps. I think I can handle not getting many meets, I dunno if I could handle the stress and anxiety of having to blindly work my way through the sea of psycho creeps trying to find someone even half decent and sane and genuine | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA
If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account
Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time
Half the time? Where are you getting your facts from bud? The Sun?
I get meets, I get offered meets. I turn down meets. If I say I’ll meet someone. I’ve never cancelled or let them down!!!
Yes! Despite how it looks on the forums, I’m picky haha
In a side. It’s, I loved how my phone changed “picky” to “lucky”!!! It knows me so well lol
A
Haha well your obviously a good one!
But I’ve met couples that have had weeks and weeks of planned meets then excuses.
I went to an 8 guy gangbang with a hot wife and husband, to be the only guy that turned up!
I think one thing guys should take away from this is that women suffer on here too. I know it’s sucks being a single guy and never getting meets, but imagine how frustrating it must be to be a couple constantly getting shitty messages, cancelled on, shit excuses, fakes, liars, creeps.
I think I can handle not getting many meets, I dunno if I could handle the stress and anxiety of having to blindly work my way through the sea of psycho creeps trying to find someone even half decent and sane and genuine "And that’s what the forums are for!!! Talk to people like they’re a human, include male and females in all conversations, and show your personality. I can’t remember the last time I met a non forumite. Don’t even bother messaging them any more, the messages get lost in the deluge of horny males demanding to “fuck now” Actually that’s a lie, there’s two non forumites I still talk to, but I rarely send 1st messages any more. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA
If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account
Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time
Half the time? Where are you getting your facts from bud? The Sun?
I get meets, I get offered meets. I turn down meets. If I say I’ll meet someone. I’ve never cancelled or let them down!!!
Yes! Despite how it looks on the forums, I’m picky haha
In a side. It’s, I loved how my phone changed “picky” to “lucky”!!! It knows me so well lol
A
Haha well your obviously a good one!
But I’ve met couples that have had weeks and weeks of planned meets then excuses.
I went to an 8 guy gangbang with a hot wife and husband, to be the only guy that turned up!
I think one thing guys should take away from this is that women suffer on here too. I know it’s sucks being a single guy and never getting meets, but imagine how frustrating it must be to be a couple constantly getting shitty messages, cancelled on, shit excuses, fakes, liars, creeps.
I think I can handle not getting many meets, I dunno if I could handle the stress and anxiety of having to blindly work my way through the sea of psycho creeps trying to find someone even half decent and sane and genuine "Agree 100% - not to mention the cost of hotels/days off/ travelling. The guys that do that are going to ruin it for the rest of us because decent couples & she’s will leave the site and there’ll only be loons left! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA
If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account
Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time
Half the time? Where are you getting your facts from bud? The Sun?
I get meets, I get offered meets. I turn down meets. If I say I’ll meet someone. I’ve never cancelled or let them down!!!
Yes! Despite how it looks on the forums, I’m picky haha
In a side. It’s, I loved how my phone changed “picky” to “lucky”!!! It knows me so well lol
A
Haha well your obviously a good one!
But I’ve met couples that have had weeks and weeks of planned meets then excuses.
I went to an 8 guy gangbang with a hot wife and husband, to be the only guy that turned up!
I think one thing guys should take away from this is that women suffer on here too. I know it’s sucks being a single guy and never getting meets, but imagine how frustrating it must be to be a couple constantly getting shitty messages, cancelled on, shit excuses, fakes, liars, creeps.
I think I can handle not getting many meets, I dunno if I could handle the stress and anxiety of having to blindly work my way through the sea of psycho creeps trying to find someone even half decent and sane and genuine
Agree 100% - not to mention the cost of hotels/days off/ travelling. The guys that do that are going to ruin it for the rest of us because decent couples & she’s will leave the site and there’ll only be loons left! "Implying there aren’t only loons left | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gosh, two more things to add into my equations - hotel costs and the degree of loony-ness. It's getting to be a Higher Tier paper, this is "Extension packs, like the IGCSE | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA
If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account
Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time
Half the time? Where are you getting your facts from bud? The Sun?
I get meets, I get offered meets. I turn down meets. If I say I’ll meet someone. I’ve never cancelled or let them down!!!
Yes! Despite how it looks on the forums, I’m picky haha
In a side. It’s, I loved how my phone changed “picky” to “lucky”!!! It knows me so well lol
A
Haha well your obviously a good one!
But I’ve met couples that have had weeks and weeks of planned meets then excuses.
I went to an 8 guy gangbang with a hot wife and husband, to be the only guy that turned up!
I think one thing guys should take away from this is that women suffer on here too. I know it’s sucks being a single guy and never getting meets, but imagine how frustrating it must be to be a couple constantly getting shitty messages, cancelled on, shit excuses, fakes, liars, creeps.
I think I can handle not getting many meets, I dunno if I could handle the stress and anxiety of having to blindly work my way through the sea of psycho creeps trying to find someone even half decent and sane and genuine
Agree 100% - not to mention the cost of hotels/days off/ travelling. The guys that do that are going to ruin it for the rest of us because decent couples & she’s will leave the site and there’ll only be loons left!
Implying there aren’t only loons left "One or two | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." Agreed ! Most the men ( not all ) that do post such threads or posts are just looking for a pat on the back and some attention! Ye got to at least try standing out on here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"HOUSE! " You went too early, sadly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"HOUSE! " So thankful it wasn’t me haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I only meet the elite anyway both here and real life so this thread doesn’t apply to me. There’s no men that could have had a meet had someone more handsome not been available because I go years, yes years between meets. Only the most handsome men who make angels weep when they lay eyes upon them get a chance to be between my thighs. " Elites - what makes you have such a entitled attitude and think you are something special? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I only meet the elite anyway both here and real life so this thread doesn’t apply to me. There’s no men that could have had a meet had someone more handsome not been available because I go years, yes years between meets. Only the most handsome men who make angels weep when they lay eyes upon them get a chance to be between my thighs. Elites - what makes you have such a entitled attitude and think you are something special? " Don’t bite mate ! Can’t find her post is she hot ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 Na mate I take that back that bitch is seriously special !
Hope she sees this ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I only meet the elite anyway both here and real life so this thread doesn’t apply to me. There’s no men that could have had a meet had someone more handsome not been available because I go years, yes years between meets. Only the most handsome men who make angels weep when they lay eyes upon them get a chance to be between my thighs. " Quite right too….. where do you want these bins putting….? Up the front or in the back?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Na mate I take that back that bitch is seriously special !
Hope she sees this ! "Hello. Where have you been? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." I see *those* men as the boys at school who would label a girl frigid if she didn’t do what they wanted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Na mate I take that back that bitch is seriously special !
Hope she sees this ! "Any need for bitch? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky? I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left. That's not picky." That's exactly what picky is. Picky means to be fussy or hard to please and by extension, means you're very careful about choosing what you like. You said it yourself. If you dont fancy someone, you won't sleep with them. You dont suddenly think I'm horny so I'll just shag that guy. Theres nothing wrong with being picky and there is nothing wrong with the guys saying women are picky either because its right. It could be 500 men or more per woman on this site. You can pick any of them or none of them. That is your call based on whatever terms you decide. Not sure how else they should they phrase it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Na mate I take that back that bitch is seriously special !
Hope she sees this ! "Average at best in my book. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Na mate I take that back that bitch is seriously special !
Hope she sees this !
Average at best in my book."‘She’s average at best with an entitled attitude. Sod that you can have her’ That was your deleted comment. Absolutely no need to comment on someone’s appearance like that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
