 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Just read someone else's..
Dogging article anyone else read it.."
I didn't realise anyone actually read this; I thought it was used to line hamster cages (poor hamsters). |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
In the age of the internet you don't have to buy or read the Mail to know an odd article that pops up when researching something. It seems Newspapers runs on fresh air anyway as no one ever admits to reading them
Either way, do you have a link OP so we an have a nose? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
As a noble and virtuous person myself, I, too, refuse to read the Daily Mail as it is:-
1.racist
2.homophobic
3.transphobic
4.Islamophobic
(Ladies, please choose one or more of the above virtues about myself that would loosen your knicker elastic just a little more should we ever meet).
I only read news sources that are in line with my own political leanings, lest I find balance or get a little bit frightened by anything outside my secure little bubble.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I like the Mail personally.. Good TV guide. What's not to like"
Its abhorrent views and propaganda, amongst other things Tom.
For years until recently it promoted the risk between the MMR jab and causing Autism. This led to many thousands not getting their children vaccinated and the resurgence of measles etc here.
They have not once issued a retraction and apology. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"As a noble and virtuous person myself, I, too, refuse to read the Daily Mail as it is:-
1.racist
2.homophobic
3.transphobic
4.Islamophobic
(Ladies, please choose one or more of the above virtues about myself that would loosen your knicker elastic just a little more should we ever meet).
I only read news sources that are in line with my own political leanings, lest I find balance or get a little bit frightened by anything outside my secure little bubble. "
Cant stand anti people phobics.
Agoraphobics, Arachnophobics etc are ok tho.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As a noble and virtuous person myself, I, too, refuse to read the Daily Mail as it is:-
1.racist
2.homophobic
3.transphobic
4.Islamophobic
(Ladies, please choose one or more of the above virtues about myself that would loosen your knicker elastic just a little more should we ever meet).
I only read news sources that are in line with my own political leanings, lest I find balance or get a little bit frightened by anything outside my secure little bubble.
Cant stand anti people phobics.
Agoraphobics, Arachnophobics etc are ok tho. "
Great comment |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"As a noble and virtuous person myself, I, too, refuse to read the Daily Mail as it is:-
1.racist
2.homophobic
3.transphobic
4.Islamophobic
(Ladies, please choose one or more of the above virtues about myself that would loosen your knicker elastic just a little more should we ever meet).
I only read news sources that are in line with my own political leanings, lest I find balance or get a little bit frightened by anything outside my secure little bubble. "
Good hustle.
Ridiculing people who don't want to support hate.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ENGUYMan
over a year ago
Hull |
OK, I may be in the minority on here, but I've been a reader of the Daily Mail for over 40 years.
I am able to read between the lines in its output, and don't take everything it prints as 100% true.
But as a newspaper, it's neither better or worse than any other papers available today. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"OK, I may be in the minority on here, but I've been a reader of the Daily Mail for over 40 years.
I am able to read between the lines in its output, and don't take everything it prints as 100% true.
But as a newspaper, it's neither better or worse than any other papers available today."
Top trolling here. Wake up pal. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
My dad used to read it until I used a highlighter to go through his old copies and show one day it said one thing, the next it said the diametric opposite.
I didn’t even waste my time pointing out how phobic everything and racist it was. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"OK, I may be in the minority on here, but I've been a reader of the Daily Mail for over 40 years.
I am able to read between the lines in its output, and don't take everything it prints as 100% true.
But as a newspaper, it's neither better or worse than any other papers available today.
Top trolling here. Wake up pal."
How is it trolling if the poster is just contributing to a thread? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I find it curious that so many profess to hate hate, yet are quite comfortable to hate a newspaper and its readers. The same people also profess that they do not read it. Do they find blind hatred to be a useful emotion to embrace in their day-to-day lives? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I find it curious that so many profess to hate hate, yet are quite comfortable to hate a newspaper and its readers. The same people also profess that they do not read it. Do they find blind hatred to be a useful emotion to embrace in their day-to-day lives?"
Are we not allowed to talk about the hate that's printed in the pages of these news papers?
Is freedom of speech only applicable to those who want to spread hate and misinformation, or are other people allowed to respond? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I find it curious that so many profess to hate hate, yet are quite comfortable to hate a newspaper and its readers. The same people also profess that they do not read it. Do they find blind hatred to be a useful emotion to embrace in their day-to-day lives?
Are we not allowed to talk about the hate that's printed in the pages of these news papers?
Is freedom of speech only applicable to those who want to spread hate and misinformation, or are other people allowed to respond?"
But you have said that you do not read it. This is the post and your response " "Don’t read that shite of a rag. "
Plus I wouldn't look at it on line either, would only give them ad revenue."
How can you "talk about the hate that's printed in the pages of these news papers" if you , as you claim, do not read them? Freedom of speech comes with responsibilities, and it seems to me that your responsibility here would be to read the material before judging it as "hateful". |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I find it curious that so many profess to hate hate, yet are quite comfortable to hate a newspaper and its readers. The same people also profess that they do not read it. Do they find blind hatred to be a useful emotion to embrace in their day-to-day lives?
Are we not allowed to talk about the hate that's printed in the pages of these news papers?
Is freedom of speech only applicable to those who want to spread hate and misinformation, or are other people allowed to respond?
But you have said that you do not read it. This is the post and your response " "Don’t read that shite of a rag. "
Plus I wouldn't look at it on line either, would only give them ad revenue."
How can you "talk about the hate that's printed in the pages of these news papers" if you , as you claim, do not read them? Freedom of speech comes with responsibilities, and it seems to me that your responsibility here would be to read the material before judging it as "hateful"."
Come on! There are plenty of places that show the stuff that's printed on the pages of the Daily Mail.
Are you suggesting that they don't promote hate against minorities, foreigners, etc?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ENGUYMan
over a year ago
Hull |
"OK, I may be in the minority on here, but I've been a reader of the Daily Mail for over 40 years.
I am able to read between the lines in its output, and don't take everything it prints as 100% true.
But as a newspaper, it's neither better or worse than any other papers available today.
Top trolling here. Wake up pal."
I'm not trolling. Just expressing a personal comment about my own choices. Plus, I'm not your pal. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"OK, I may be in the minority on here, but I've been a reader of the Daily Mail for over 40 years.
I am able to read between the lines in its output, and don't take everything it prints as 100% true.
But as a newspaper, it's neither better or worse than any other papers available today.
Top trolling here. Wake up pal.
I'm not trolling. Just expressing a personal comment about my own choices. Plus, I'm not your pal."
Thankfully. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
