FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Permanent lockdown for UK men after 6pm
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A member of parliament suggested this right? Absurd!" Not sure she’s elected? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A member of parliament suggested this right? Absurd!" Yes it is currently being discussed in parliament in regards to the Sarah Everard case | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this something suggested by someone from the Green Party. I can’t see how it would ever work total nonsense " Mark Drakeford, The Welsh first minister and in charge of the decision making is considering it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A member of parliament suggested this right? Absurd! Yes it is currently being discussed in parliament in regards to the Sarah Everard case" Being mentioned by one person in the House of Lords is very different from "currently being discussed in parliament" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A member of parliament suggested this right? Absurd! Yes it is currently being discussed in parliament in regards to the Sarah Everard case Being mentioned by one person in the House of Lords is very different from "currently being discussed in parliament" " As I have stated, It is being considered by the Welsh government leader | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Mark Drakeford, The Welsh first minister and in charge of the decision making is considering it" Wales Online today says Drakeford is not considering it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's stupid but if it gets people talking more about women's safety on the streets then it's a good thing surely. I doubt they are considering it with any great seriousness. I haven't read the news so I may be wrong. " The Baroness who mentioned it said it was in response to people who say women put themselves at risk by being out at night. She didn't mean it as a serious suggestion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Mark Drakeford, The Welsh first minister and in charge of the decision making is considering it Wales Online today says Drakeford is not considering it" It's been edited - The First Minister issued a statement after "he was reported to be considering" the move in the wake of the disappearance of Sarah Everard Yesterday he actually was considering it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How would it work with the Equality Act ?" The Equality Act? an act that people choose to roll out and quote when it suits. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's stupid but if it gets people talking more about women's safety on the streets then it's a good thing surely. I doubt they are considering it with any great seriousness. I haven't read the news so I may be wrong. The Baroness who mentioned it said it was in response to people who say women put themselves at risk by being out at night. She didn't mean it as a serious suggestion. " Maybe not, but I can almost guarantee that with the lunacy going on at the minute it will only be a matter of time before someone does make it a serious suggestion. Will it actually happen.... I suspect not but it certainly wouldn't stop someone taking a go at it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Mark Drakeford, The Welsh first minister and in charge of the decision making is considering it Wales Online today says Drakeford is not considering it" This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How would it work with the Equality Act ? The Equality Act? an act that people choose to roll out and quote when it suits. " Oh dear | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ridiculous " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does the curfew include make Policemen then?????" Good point ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does the curfew include make Policemen then?????" Maybe it’s only men that have 9-5 jobs are cunts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A member of parliament suggested this right? Absurd! Yes it is currently being discussed in parliament in regards to the Sarah Everard case Being mentioned by one person in the House of Lords is very different from "currently being discussed in parliament" " Exactly that, especially as the one that mentioned it was from the Green party | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was it not just a hyperbole? Said in a way to make people say "you can't do that" or "totally unrealistic" yet them same sectors of society say that if women don't feel safe out at night on their own they should stay at home? " Yes it was exactly this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was it not just a hyperbole? Said in a way to make people say "you can't do that" or "totally unrealistic" yet them same sectors of society say that if women don't feel safe out at night on their own they should stay at home? Yes it was exactly this" It's bad that more people are outraged about this than they are about the act that started the debate. People are to quick to turn a blind eye to womens safety. It says something when a woman is more likely to attract attention if she shouts "fire" rather than "help" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didn’t know some politics was going into comedy but the woman was using it in context with what women are told to look after themselves. She was making a point about how ludicrous it all is . Don’t go out late - don’t walk alone . Don’t wear headphones . Don’t wear a vest top . Don’t show to much leg etc etc . Was obvious some of the shitrag papers / sites would it eat up for a story " There was an art exhibition a few years back about what some females wore when they were attacked. The majority of them were normal everyday clothes such as jeans, t shirts, hoodies, that sort of thing. It. Totally dispelled the myth that it's clothes that are the problem. Something else that proves that theory wrong is the fact that if lesbians and bi woman can control themselves round scantily dressed women then maybe its not the clothes that are the issue. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didn’t know some politics was going into comedy but the woman was using it in context with what women are told to look after themselves. She was making a point about how ludicrous it all is . Don’t go out late - don’t walk alone . Don’t wear headphones . Don’t wear a vest top . Don’t show to much leg etc etc . Was obvious some of the shitrag papers / sites would it eat up for a story " Don’t wear headphones is a sensible suggestion, if you are zoned out to music how can you hear what is going on around you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this something suggested by someone from the Green Party. I can’t see how it would ever work total nonsense Mark Drakeford, The Welsh first minister and in charge of the decision making is considering it" No he isn't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didn’t know some politics was going into comedy but the woman was using it in context with what women are told to look after themselves. She was making a point about how ludicrous it all is . Don’t go out late - don’t walk alone . Don’t wear headphones . Don’t wear a vest top . Don’t show to much leg etc etc . Was obvious some of the shitrag papers / sites would it eat up for a story There was an art exhibition a few years back about what some females wore when they were attacked. The majority of them were normal everyday clothes such as jeans, t shirts, hoodies, that sort of thing. It. Totally dispelled the myth that it's clothes that are the problem. Something else that proves that theory wrong is the fact that if lesbians and bi woman can control themselves round scantily dressed women then maybe its not the clothes that are the issue. " Yeah it’s silly people need to learn to not be a predator or entitled prick . I have big boobs (implants ) in summer I wear vest tops. The amount of comments I get is mad I had a car swerve over pavement and stop to ask if I wanted to get in and he will drive me home When I declined I was given the old. But look at your big tits you are clearly gagging for it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didn’t know some politics was going into comedy but the woman was using it in context with what women are told to look after themselves. She was making a point about how ludicrous it all is . Don’t go out late - don’t walk alone . Don’t wear headphones . Don’t wear a vest top . Don’t show to much leg etc etc . Was obvious some of the shitrag papers / sites would it eat up for a story " They didn't need to though. It's clear from all the discussion about it that some people are completely incapable of considering the context and subtleties of the point being made and just go into meltdown over their very black and white interpretation but this is far from the first time I've seen that happen. People these days don't seem to want to understand an issue, they just want to read sound bites of information and either latch onto those they agree with and repeat it for eternity or be outraged after reading a single sentence (usually a headline granted). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didn’t know some politics was going into comedy but the woman was using it in context with what women are told to look after themselves. She was making a point about how ludicrous it all is . Don’t go out late - don’t walk alone . Don’t wear headphones . Don’t wear a vest top . Don’t show to much leg etc etc . Was obvious some of the shitrag papers / sites would it eat up for a story Don’t wear headphones is a sensible suggestion, if you are zoned out to music how can you hear what is going on around you. " Of course that’s situational awareness but it affects women far more than men . In certain areas you need to be vigilant regardless of gender . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didn’t know some politics was going into comedy but the woman was using it in context with what women are told to look after themselves. She was making a point about how ludicrous it all is . Don’t go out late - don’t walk alone . Don’t wear headphones . Don’t wear a vest top . Don’t show to much leg etc etc . Was obvious some of the shitrag papers / sites would it eat up for a story There was an art exhibition a few years back about what some females wore when they were attacked. The majority of them were normal everyday clothes such as jeans, t shirts, hoodies, that sort of thing. It. Totally dispelled the myth that it's clothes that are the problem. Something else that proves that theory wrong is the fact that if lesbians and bi woman can control themselves round scantily dressed women then maybe its not the clothes that are the issue. Yeah it’s silly people need to learn to not be a predator or entitled prick . I have big boobs (implants ) in summer I wear vest tops. The amount of comments I get is mad I had a car swerve over pavement and stop to ask if I wanted to get in and he will drive me home When I declined I was given the old. But look at your big tits you are clearly gagging for it " That's awful. The size of someone's knockers shouldn't be a determination as to their willingness to have a quick fumble. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What’s more ridiculous, telling men they can’t leave home after 6pm or telling women’s not to go out after dark which was the Mets genuine advice? Genuine question" Yep. I really wish more people would get as outraged over women being told this. Literally yesterday I had this conversation with a guy at work and he said "well why do you want to go out after dark anyway?" It's getting dark at 5pm in winter and I often work far later than this. Who's going to tell my boss I need early finishes all winter so I can get home before dark? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didn’t know some politics was going into comedy but the woman was using it in context with what women are told to look after themselves. She was making a point about how ludicrous it all is . Don’t go out late - don’t walk alone . Don’t wear headphones . Don’t wear a vest top . Don’t show to much leg etc etc . Was obvious some of the shitrag papers / sites would it eat up for a story Don’t wear headphones is a sensible suggestion, if you are zoned out to music how can you hear what is going on around you. Of course that’s situational awareness but it affects women far more than men . In certain areas you need to be vigilant regardless of gender . " I have no idea whether it effects a gender more than others. Everyone should be vigilant and take responsibility for their situational awareness and headphones is a simple one, just like those that choose to walk with their face in their phone rather than looking where they are going. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thoughts..?" what fake news. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we need to except there are wicked people both male and female. Rose West Maxine Carr Myra Hindly.....to name just the most obvious female. " Maxine Carr gave someone a false alibi. She isn't a murderer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we need to except there are wicked people both male and female. Rose West Maxine Carr Myra Hindly.....to name just the most obvious female. Maxine Carr gave someone a false alibi. She isn't a murderer." She wasn’t stupid tho she knew why he wanted a false alibi which still makes her a evil Cunt.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we need to except there are wicked people both male and female. Rose West Maxine Carr Myra Hindly.....to name just the most obvious female. Maxine Carr gave someone a false alibi. She isn't a murderer." Yes I totally understand the differences in each I chose to use as examples but wicked never the less. To shield someone knowing he murdered to girls is to me wicked. I just want to try and express that both men and women can be wicked but both men and women are capable of acts of selfless bravery, kindness and sacrifice. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Something else as well. Men that are scared or wary about going out alone at night because of fears of assault or violence is because of other men. Collectively, all of us, doesn't matter if your male or female, doesn't matter if you're a mum, a dad, a cousin, an auntie, it doesn't matter we all need to teach our boys to do better. To treat people as just that. To have consideration, to have empathy and above all else how to treat each other. " Delete your profile and remove yourself from fab immediately young lady !!! There's no room for people who post well thought out, sensible, logical responses | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thoughts..?" More men likely to start dressing as women? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unreasonable unrealistic and unfair Lets just be done and demonise the whole of the male population....I thought as species we would move forward with our thinking not backward, there will be suggestions of pitchforks and fires next. You cannot punish the whole of the male demograph for the disgusting acts of a few. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Something else as well. Men that are scared or wary about going out alone at night because of fears of assault or violence is because of other men. Collectively, all of us, doesn't matter if your male or female, doesn't matter if you're a mum, a dad, a cousin, an auntie, it doesn't matter we all need to teach our boys to do better. To treat people as just that. To have consideration, to have empathy and above all else how to treat each other. Delete your profile and remove yourself from fab immediately young lady !!! There's no room for people who post well thought out, sensible, logical responses " Been a while since I've been called a young lady. Seriously though, some people go face first into the point and still can't see it. X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Something else as well. Men that are scared or wary about going out alone at night because of fears of assault or violence is because of other men. Collectively, all of us, doesn't matter if your male or female, doesn't matter if you're a mum, a dad, a cousin, an auntie, it doesn't matter we all need to teach our boys to do better. To treat people as just that. To have consideration, to have empathy and above all else how to treat each other. " Bingo! Teach our kids to do better and hold other guys to account for their actions, that’s what needs to happen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do think this is being approached from the wrong angle we need better punishment for offenders I believe r*pe and murder should carry a death sentence!" The majority of rapists are never even arrested. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even if this were genuinely being considered, another factor for you - What if Men suddenly start claiming to identify as non-binary/non-gender specific?" Which is supported by the same person who proposed the curfew. Treat the cause, not the symptom. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was it not just a hyperbole? Said in a way to make people say "you can't do that" or "totally unrealistic" yet them same sectors of society say that if women don't feel safe out at night on their own they should stay at home? Yes it was exactly this It's bad that more people are outraged about this than they are about the act that started the debate. People are to quick to turn a blind eye to womens safety. It says something when a woman is more likely to attract attention if she shouts "fire" rather than "help" " Yes, this thread bears that out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unreasonable unrealistic and unfair Lets just be done and demonise the whole of the male population....I thought as species we would move forward with our thinking not backward, there will be suggestions of pitchforks and fires next. You cannot punish the whole of the male demograph for the disgusting acts of a few. " Yet the whole of the female demograph is being punished for being born with a vag. We've been told forever not to go out after dark, we've been told forever "well you shouldn't have been out after dark" when we've been subjected to harassment. We've been told "you should have had that much to drink" when we've been assaulted on a night out. We've been told "what did you think was gonna happen wearing those clothes" It wasn't about men really being given a curfew. It was about men getting a sense of what it's like to be a woman. Being victimised, being restricted, being told it's your own fault for being a certain sex. Hopefully, just hopefully they'll actually take it on board and consider their actions more carefully. Hopefully, just hopefully it'll make them think twice before catcalling, whistling, running up behind someone, grabbing someone's arse, taking a sly photo on the train of someone's tits, sitting next to someone on a bus when they're the only other person on it, pressuring someone for their phone number. The list is vast, but the list is something that lots see as banter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do think this is being approached from the wrong angle we need better punishment for offenders I believe r*pe and murder should carry a death sentence! The majority of rapists are never even arrested. " I think it's something like 98% of them are never even convicted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A sad reflection of what todays society has become. Women are encouraged to work jobs that are normally done by men yet cant walk/run along a street with out feeling intimiadated. Now men are being made to feel that they are all a threat to women. The minority of men cause problems for the majority of men who have respect. " This exactly. I’ve been the subject of 2 men who parked next to me at a Club and informed me when I got to my car they would follow me home and do bad things to me as they had watched me in the club all evening. I was too scared to walk across the car park back into the club in case I was grabbed! Luckily my fwb was parked in his car near me so I rang him and he told me to set off and he would stay and watch them. Luckily they did not follow me and I rang the club owner the next day who knew who they were. It’s a scary world for women when there are a few men who cause problems like this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do think this is being approached from the wrong angle we need better punishment for offenders I believe r*pe and murder should carry a death sentence!" All crime should carry a larger sentence. We may actually see a reduction in it then. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thoughts..?" Just going in the context you put it yeah sure why not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do think this is being approached from the wrong angle we need better punishment for offenders I believe r*pe and murder should carry a death sentence! The majority of rapists are never even arrested. I think it's something like 98% of them are never even convicted. " Sadly it's often one word against another, with no other evidence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do think this is being approached from the wrong angle we need better punishment for offenders I believe r*pe and murder should carry a death sentence! All crime should carry a larger sentence. We may actually see a reduction in it then." I agree with the death penalty for crimes such as... James Bulger Soham murders Sarah Payne....and the most recent case. I know the killers of James Bulger were only children themselves and even I cannot see how we can condemn children to death but would the death penalty act as a serious deterrent? On another thread regarding James Bulger, there was a higher agreement for the death penalty. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A sad reflection of what todays society has become. Women are encouraged to work jobs that are normally done by men yet cant walk/run along a street with out feeling intimiadated. Now men are being made to feel that they are all a threat to women. The minority of men cause problems for the majority of men who have respect. This exactly. I’ve been the subject of 2 men who parked next to me at a Club and informed me when I got to my car they would follow me home and do bad things to me as they had watched me in the club all evening. I was too scared to walk across the car park back into the club in case I was grabbed! Luckily my fwb was parked in his car near me so I rang him and he told me to set off and he would stay and watch them. Luckily they did not follow me and I rang the club owner the next day who knew who they were. It’s a scary world for women when there are a few men who cause problems like this. " These comments ‘it’s a few men’ really make me wonder how people consider this. The study shows that 98% of women had received some degree of sexual harassment. These aren’t the actions of ‘a few’ these are the actions of most. Newsflash; if you’ve not taken no for an answer, sent an unsolicited cock pic, grabbed or touched someone inappropriately, cat called, pestered, commented overtly on a woman’s sexual availability, amongst other things, then you’re part of the problem. The people doing these things are all around us, probably even commented on this. Until guys learn to stop, then this will continue and it needs to stop | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do think this is being approached from the wrong angle we need better punishment for offenders I believe r*pe and murder should carry a death sentence! The majority of rapists are never even arrested. I think it's something like 98% of them are never even convicted. Sadly it's often one word against another, with no other evidence. " That’s not even the case. The CPS will only move forwards with cases that they know they will win. Irrefutable evidence. That rules out the vast majority of cases. Sadly they won’t prosecute even with DNA evidence. Rapists walk free all the time, every day as the CPS doesn’t want to argue cases of consent | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The study shows that 98% of women had received some degree of sexual harassment." An absolutely trash figure. Not possible to actually take that averaged out statistic based on a fraction of the country’s women to suggest it’s a real figure. 98% my ass. There’s so many things to consider. 1. If 98% of the entirely population of the country has been sexually harassed, that automatically means a MASSIVE proportion of the country’s men are fucking cunts. If it is truly the case, I must be a fucking saint because I have never once harassed a woman or made anyone feel that way. Not even close. Most men are not predators and most men do not treat women like shit. Saying 98% of women have experienced it means most men are absolute fucking dicks. Just unrealistic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here." The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here. The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament." The entire point is that women effectively have a curfew or we're "asking for trouble" and it's then our fault if anything happens to us. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The study shows that 98% of women had received some degree of sexual harassment. An absolutely trash figure. Not possible to actually take that averaged out statistic based on a fraction of the country’s women to suggest it’s a real figure. 98% my ass. There’s so many things to consider. 1. If 98% of the entirely population of the country has been sexually harassed, that automatically means a MASSIVE proportion of the country’s men are fucking cunts. If it is truly the case, I must be a fucking saint because I have never once harassed a woman or made anyone feel that way. Not even close. Most men are not predators and most men do not treat women like shit. Saying 98% of women have experienced it means most men are absolute fucking dicks. Just unrealistic." So women are just liars then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here. The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament. The entire point is that women effectively have a curfew or we're "asking for trouble" and it's then our fault if anything happens to us. " Lots of men don't feel safe walking alone down streets late at night. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The study shows that 98% of women had received some degree of sexual harassment. An absolutely trash figure. Not possible to actually take that averaged out statistic based on a fraction of the country’s women to suggest it’s a real figure. 98% my ass. There’s so many things to consider. 1. If 98% of the entirely population of the country has been sexually harassed, that automatically means a MASSIVE proportion of the country’s men are fucking cunts. If it is truly the case, I must be a fucking saint because I have never once harassed a woman or made anyone feel that way. Not even close. Most men are not predators and most men do not treat women like shit. Saying 98% of women have experienced it means most men are absolute fucking dicks. Just unrealistic." In another thread on here said this 98% included just about anything that a woman felt was abuse and included "sending dick pics". Some ladies argued differently on the issue but were forum shamed by their own peers. Technically its more like 100% as there isn't a universally clear activity which doesn't cause sexual harassment to someone. As I posted in a forum on Meghan and Opera Oprah, as Oprah asked...."it's your truth" as if it can therefore never be challenged. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The study shows that 98% of women had received some degree of sexual harassment. An absolutely trash figure. Not possible to actually take that averaged out statistic based on a fraction of the country’s women to suggest it’s a real figure. 98% my ass. There’s so many things to consider. 1. If 98% of the entirely population of the country has been sexually harassed, that automatically means a MASSIVE proportion of the country’s men are fucking cunts. If it is truly the case, I must be a fucking saint because I have never once harassed a woman or made anyone feel that way. Not even close. Most men are not predators and most men do not treat women like shit. Saying 98% of women have experienced it means most men are absolute fucking dicks. Just unrealistic." Eyeing up someones boobs could even be classed as harassment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here. The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament. The entire point is that women effectively have a curfew or we're "asking for trouble" and it's then our fault if anything happens to us. Lots of men don't feel safe walking alone down streets late at night." Because of women? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here. The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament. The entire point is that women effectively have a curfew or we're "asking for trouble" and it's then our fault if anything happens to us. Lots of men don't feel safe walking alone down streets late at night." Because of fears of violence or assault from other men! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If that were to happen, I would just not identify myself as a man. Easy! " Hah. But it won’t and can’t. So I’m not even thinking about it. What I am thinking about is that when people I know need to walk late at night... women OR men, if I know about it, I’m the first to offer a lift. This is not a world where even men feel safe on many streets. We live in a pretty amazing part of the world and should be glad we aren’t seeing the kind of violence you get on say, the streets in Mexico or the war zones in Israel or the insane bullshit laws around women’s rights in the Middle East. We are very lucky. But these kind of things still happen and we should all do our best to help each other. This isn’t about teaching guys that stalking is wrong... yeh, let me be clear.. we fucking know it’s wrong. The minuscule amount of ropey mother fuckers doing it and aggravating women are not part of our crowd. They’re idiots who know it’s wrong. They just don’t care. It’s not about “protecting our little women” either. Shit, I’ve known women who can beat up a few of the bigger guys here lol. It’s about all being aware that if we can help, we should. If you know someone takes a dangerous path home and you can offer a lift (lockdown makes it difficult right now of course), then do so. If your mate is a dick to women, punch his fucking head in and ask if he likes it. You know, the little things. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The person suggesting this was making a point about how society expects women to adapt to avoid male violence, and not by addressing male behaviour. It's not a serious legal proposal. " Exactly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here. The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament. The entire point is that women effectively have a curfew or we're "asking for trouble" and it's then our fault if anything happens to us. Lots of men don't feel safe walking alone down streets late at night. Because of fears of violence or assault from other men! " You’ve utterly missed my entire point. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I don't remember a call for all women to be curfewed after Beverley Allitt or Myra Hyndley did their crimes. " Should all Policemen be put under house arrest ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If that were to happen, I would just not identify myself as a man. Easy! " It's becoming more and more difficult to argue against your response now. It wasn't long ago that a 'male' bather went into the female only outdoor pool in London and was asked to leave, but argued "today I'm a female". His lawyer argued this in court under the sexual discrimination act. Later on around 20 members of the Man Friday group took to the male-only bathing pool on Hampstead Heath. One woman donned a bushy beard while another swam in a lime mankini to demonstrate that they identified as men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was it not just a hyperbole? Said in a way to make people say "you can't do that" or "totally unrealistic" yet them same sectors of society say that if women don't feel safe out at night on their own they should stay at home? Yes it was exactly this It's bad that more people are outraged about this than they are about the act that started the debate. People are to quick to turn a blind eye to womens safety. It says something when a woman is more likely to attract attention if she shouts "fire" rather than "help" " I keep reading this on threads. Is this actually true? Who carried out this piece of research? It does sound like an anecdotal urban myth. Im not disparaging that people feel unsafe at night or that many women have felt they were at risk or have been subject to attack. However if we are going to make significant improvements to personal safety, change behaviours and societal attitudes then we need to work with facts and evidence not hyperbole and exaggerations. The reality is grim enough. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If that were to happen, I would just not identify myself as a man. Easy! Hah. But it won’t and can’t. So I’m not even thinking about it. What I am thinking about is that when people I know need to walk late at night... women OR men, if I know about it, I’m the first to offer a lift. This is not a world where even men feel safe on many streets. We live in a pretty amazing part of the world and should be glad we aren’t seeing the kind of violence you get on say, the streets in Mexico or the war zones in Israel or the insane bullshit laws around women’s rights in the Middle East. We are very lucky. But these kind of things still happen and we should all do our best to help each other. This isn’t about teaching guys that stalking is wrong... yeh, let me be clear.. we fucking know it’s wrong. The minuscule amount of ropey mother fuckers doing it and aggravating women are not part of our crowd. They’re idiots who know it’s wrong. They just don’t care. It’s not about “protecting our little women” either. Shit, I’ve known women who can beat up a few of the bigger guys here lol. It’s about all being aware that if we can help, we should. If you know someone takes a dangerous path home and you can offer a lift (lockdown makes it difficult right now of course), then do so. If your mate is a dick to women, punch his fucking head in and ask if he likes it. You know, the little things." But it has... 2018 Hampton bathing pools. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was it not just a hyperbole? Said in a way to make people say "you can't do that" or "totally unrealistic" yet them same sectors of society say that if women don't feel safe out at night on their own they should stay at home? Yes it was exactly this It's bad that more people are outraged about this than they are about the act that started the debate. People are to quick to turn a blind eye to womens safety. It says something when a woman is more likely to attract attention if she shouts "fire" rather than "help" I keep reading this on threads. Is this actually true? Who carried out this piece of research? It does sound like an anecdotal urban myth. Im not disparaging that people feel unsafe at night or that many women have felt they were at risk or have been subject to attack. However if we are going to make significant improvements to personal safety, change behaviours and societal attitudes then we need to work with facts and evidence not hyperbole and exaggerations. The reality is grim enough. " Agree with much of this. Sadly all too often thought the response is a bandage and appeases many whist it doesn't stop those who are perpetrating the acts whatever they are. They will continue to do it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is it really that bad in the UK ? Wanting to restrict men's freedom of movement is it that warranted ? I being naive because I don't know since alot of attacks on women are under reported atleast in the states they are. " I understand your point. I guess the issue shouldn't be compared to other countries which for many here they could never survive emotionally or mentally as their attitudes are at the other extreme of the spectrum. We can only look and deal with our own; our homes, children, friends, village, town, country, forum interactions. Comparisons have their place but as we've seen in the pandemic debates they have limited value as comparisons are mostly incomparable. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here. The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament. The entire point is that women effectively have a curfew or we're "asking for trouble" and it's then our fault if anything happens to us. Lots of men don't feel safe walking alone down streets late at night. Because of fears of violence or assault from other men! You’ve utterly missed my entire point." I think that your response of statistics and disbelief is entirely understandable but then using that as a leaping point to hit ‘it’s not true’ is deeply problematic. I realise that it’s an uncomfortable thought but if these women are telling their truth, which they have no reason not to, then the conclusion must be that a lot of guys really are that bad. I know it’s hard to live with but the alternate option is to ignore women when they do speak up about their bodies, which is even more uncomfortable | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here. The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament. The entire point is that women effectively have a curfew or we're "asking for trouble" and it's then our fault if anything happens to us. Lots of men don't feel safe walking alone down streets late at night. Because of fears of violence or assault from other men! You’ve utterly missed my entire point. I think that your response of statistics and disbelief is entirely understandable but then using that as a leaping point to hit ‘it’s not true’ is deeply problematic. I realise that it’s an uncomfortable thought but if these women are telling their truth, which they have no reason not to, then the conclusion must be that a lot of guys really are that bad. I know it’s hard to live with but the alternate option is to ignore women when they do speak up about their bodies, which is even more uncomfortable " Exactly, if you struggle with the statistics. Just glance over this thread... https://m.fabswingers.com/forum/lounge/1132732 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here. The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament. The entire point is that women effectively have a curfew or we're "asking for trouble" and it's then our fault if anything happens to us. Lots of men don't feel safe walking alone down streets late at night. Because of women? " Because of the perceived threat of criminal behaviour. There has been an understandable explosion of women documenting their hyper-vigilant and avoidant practices when alone in public but men do this too. Whether to the same degree, I don't know if there is evidence to support that. My experience may not be representative but I have been assaulted and harassed by women in public (more so than by men). I also think women overlook the extent that they are perpetrators of harassment, especially in rule-bound, institutional environments where they feel safer doing so. I have been bullied by far more women at work than men for example. I think it is more helpful to focus on the behaviour in question than the gender of the perpetrator personally. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here. The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament. The entire point is that women effectively have a curfew or we're "asking for trouble" and it's then our fault if anything happens to us. Lots of men don't feel safe walking alone down streets late at night. Because of fears of violence or assault from other men! You’ve utterly missed my entire point. I think that your response of statistics and disbelief is entirely understandable but then using that as a leaping point to hit ‘it’s not true’ is deeply problematic. I realise that it’s an uncomfortable thought but if these women are telling their truth, which they have no reason not to, then the conclusion must be that a lot of guys really are that bad. I know it’s hard to live with but the alternate option is to ignore women when they do speak up about their bodies, which is even more uncomfortable " I didn’t say they weren’t telling the truth. But the 98% figure is wrong. Now, I know plenty of women have had problems with lower guys thinking they have the right to do whatever they please. They do not. There’s genuine and tough reality in this couple in a past relationship of sexual violence. So don’t assume anything I say. But the fact is, everything I see about it says the following; Men are the problem All men need to fix the problem That has nothing to do with actual solutions as to how to eradicate the weirdos who do this kind of shit. Not one group or even person has proposed anything other than hyperbolic and inflammatory statements. This does not solve the issue. And honestly, I (Dave... stayed out of guilt) suffered serious, bone breaking violence in a relationship for years and no one gives a shit about that. There’s no one size fits all answer to any of this stuff and it’s inane to even waste breath bringing stupid “solutions” up. Honestly, there is no perfect solution, but wide bullshit concepts to fit the issue - or worse, to get Twitter likes - is not useful. Someone here, a woman who has experienced actual violence in the streets - if you have any real, sensible suggestions, we’re all ears, Sammi (who as mentioned did suffer a horrific attack) has no answer to it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here. The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament. The entire point is that women effectively have a curfew or we're "asking for trouble" and it's then our fault if anything happens to us. Lots of men don't feel safe walking alone down streets late at night. Because of fears of violence or assault from other men! You’ve utterly missed my entire point. I think that your response of statistics and disbelief is entirely understandable but then using that as a leaping point to hit ‘it’s not true’ is deeply problematic. I realise that it’s an uncomfortable thought but if these women are telling their truth, which they have no reason not to, then the conclusion must be that a lot of guys really are that bad. I know it’s hard to live with but the alternate option is to ignore women when they do speak up about their bodies, which is even more uncomfortable I didn’t say they weren’t telling the truth. But the 98% figure is wrong. Now, I know plenty of women have had problems with lower guys thinking they have the right to do whatever they please. They do not. There’s genuine and tough reality in this couple in a past relationship of sexual violence. So don’t assume anything I say. But the fact is, everything I see about it says the following; Men are the problem All men need to fix the problem That has nothing to do with actual solutions as to how to eradicate the weirdos who do this kind of shit. Not one group or even person has proposed anything other than hyperbolic and inflammatory statements. This does not solve the issue. And honestly, I (Dave... stayed out of guilt) suffered serious, bone breaking violence in a relationship for years and no one gives a shit about that. There’s no one size fits all answer to any of this stuff and it’s inane to even waste breath bringing stupid “solutions” up. Honestly, there is no perfect solution, but wide bullshit concepts to fit the issue - or worse, to get Twitter likes - is not useful. Someone here, a woman who has experienced actual violence in the streets - if you have any real, sensible suggestions, we’re all ears, Sammi (who as mentioned did suffer a horrific attack) has no answer to it." 98% of women say they have been sexually harrassed. You say the figure is wrong but you're not saying they're not telling the truth? How does that work? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here. The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament. The entire point is that women effectively have a curfew or we're "asking for trouble" and it's then our fault if anything happens to us. Lots of men don't feel safe walking alone down streets late at night. Because of fears of violence or assault from other men! You’ve utterly missed my entire point. I think that your response of statistics and disbelief is entirely understandable but then using that as a leaping point to hit ‘it’s not true’ is deeply problematic. I realise that it’s an uncomfortable thought but if these women are telling their truth, which they have no reason not to, then the conclusion must be that a lot of guys really are that bad. I know it’s hard to live with but the alternate option is to ignore women when they do speak up about their bodies, which is even more uncomfortable I didn’t say they weren’t telling the truth. But the 98% figure is wrong. Now, I know plenty of women have had problems with lower guys thinking they have the right to do whatever they please. They do not. There’s genuine and tough reality in this couple in a past relationship of sexual violence. So don’t assume anything I say. But the fact is, everything I see about it says the following; Men are the problem All men need to fix the problem That has nothing to do with actual solutions as to how to eradicate the weirdos who do this kind of shit. Not one group or even person has proposed anything other than hyperbolic and inflammatory statements. This does not solve the issue. And honestly, I (Dave... stayed out of guilt) suffered serious, bone breaking violence in a relationship for years and no one gives a shit about that. There’s no one size fits all answer to any of this stuff and it’s inane to even waste breath bringing stupid “solutions” up. Honestly, there is no perfect solution, but wide bullshit concepts to fit the issue - or worse, to get Twitter likes - is not useful. Someone here, a woman who has experienced actual violence in the streets - if you have any real, sensible suggestions, we’re all ears, Sammi (who as mentioned did suffer a horrific attack) has no answer to it. 98% of women say they have been sexually harrassed. You say the figure is wrong but you're not saying they're not telling the truth? How does that work? " Thing is people have different perceptions of “sexually harassed” as seen on the many threads. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was this not proposed buy the same Green 'Peace' lady who used data protection laws to obtain files on herself from the database, which police say is used to monitor activists who could use criminal methods to promote their political aims. She insisted that she and another be removed from this database. There's an irony here. The woman needs to be sacked. Using money from other people to get paid to speak such drivel. What a sad state. I think we should ban all women from going out after 6pm because I once saw a woman stab a guy she’d never even met before just while he was getting cash out. Does that sound sensible? Of course not. The weirdo guys out there doing shit is going to in the 0.X% of the men in this country. Punishing everyone because we are born in a certain body is fucking ridiculous and adds to the problem. Solutions are prevention and punishment of the crimes, not talking out of your idiot ass in parliament. The entire point is that women effectively have a curfew or we're "asking for trouble" and it's then our fault if anything happens to us. Lots of men don't feel safe walking alone down streets late at night. Because of fears of violence or assault from other men! You’ve utterly missed my entire point. I think that your response of statistics and disbelief is entirely understandable but then using that as a leaping point to hit ‘it’s not true’ is deeply problematic. I realise that it’s an uncomfortable thought but if these women are telling their truth, which they have no reason not to, then the conclusion must be that a lot of guys really are that bad. I know it’s hard to live with but the alternate option is to ignore women when they do speak up about their bodies, which is even more uncomfortable I didn’t say they weren’t telling the truth. But the 98% figure is wrong. Now, I know plenty of women have had problems with lower guys thinking they have the right to do whatever they please. They do not. There’s genuine and tough reality in this couple in a past relationship of sexual violence. So don’t assume anything I say. But the fact is, everything I see about it says the following; Men are the problem All men need to fix the problem That has nothing to do with actual solutions as to how to eradicate the weirdos who do this kind of shit. Not one group or even person has proposed anything other than hyperbolic and inflammatory statements. This does not solve the issue. And honestly, I (Dave... stayed out of guilt) suffered serious, bone breaking violence in a relationship for years and no one gives a shit about that. There’s no one size fits all answer to any of this stuff and it’s inane to even waste breath bringing stupid “solutions” up. Honestly, there is no perfect solution, but wide bullshit concepts to fit the issue - or worse, to get Twitter likes - is not useful. Someone here, a woman who has experienced actual violence in the streets - if you have any real, sensible suggestions, we’re all ears, Sammi (who as mentioned did suffer a horrific attack) has no answer to it." I think that it’s easy, comforting and ultimately, a fallacy, to call them ‘low life’s, monsters or weirdos’ as that distances them from our everyday life. You disagree that it’s 98% however, until every person in the world is questioned, then the number is still up for question according to that thought process. At some point you have to recognise that (whether you refute the exact number) that statistic is horrific. That number points to it not being ‘weirdos’, these people are the people that we know. As for resolving the issues, you reject the concept of accountability from society but have no alternative? It seems to me that these figures, responses, conclusions and opinions make you feel uncomfortable and so you’re almost in denial about the reality. I understand that but your disbelief is not solving anything | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Totally stupid. What does it mean for men who finish work after curfew, or go to the shops because they don't have any other time to do it. Maybe women should live in a society where we feel safe, that we don't have to keep looking behind us when walking/ jogging, back tracking, taking the long route home to avoid dark areas, where we don't need location trackers on our phones and keys in our hands. Maybe we should consider the fact that not all men are dangerous and that we should give them the benefit of the doubt. In doing so though men should respect boundaries and that No means No and not hurl abuse , just accept and move on. Since all of this has come to light something like 9/10 women have admitted to being assaulted/ sexually harassed or stalked. Despite the women's lib movement we will the majority of the time be the weaker sex. I accept that through gritted teeth, im 5ft and not strong by any means and admit I couldn't fight someone off of me easily. Its sad that I've thought that through though. I speak from my experience, I was stalked for a number of years by a man who went on to serve 7 years for a sexual attack and gbh for a prior attack. I then was stalked by an ex who thought it was acceptable to hound me and make my life uncomfortable. Its important men know how vulnerable women feel on a day to day basis be it at home, the work place , the supermarket or running errands. Also as parents we need to raise our boys to respect women and learn how to treat them while teaching our girls how to respect and treat boys it works both ways but also and how to defend themselves in an emergency. Hope this is as balanced a comment as in my head I wanted it to sound. " Its not just women who do this. As a genuine man i take my personel safety very seriously and wont walk alone at night unless i have to as i never have done. I carry my keys in my hand and cross to avoid dodgy looking people. This to me is common sense as i know there are idiots about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"She was playing devils advocate, she appended it in thought to a bill already put forward. Her idea was to provoke thought ...... and it did. i.e. Stop saying.. keep the women safe by keeping them in ...... She was putting the boot on the other foot and saying ..... How do you like THESE onions .... MEN STAY IN! She knows it would be ridiculous. She was trying for proper societal solutions ..... not knee jerk ineffective protect the victim actions." Yet something that seems so unbelievably difficult to fucking grasp for many. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Thing is people have different perceptions of “sexually harassed” as seen on the many threads. " I think that whilst the definition of sexual harassment might be less finite than is preferable, isn’t the key point that women were made to feel invaded and harassed? Whether one considers an unsolicited cock pic to be harassment and another doesn’t, is undermining the discussion and dismissing those that are experiencing it. Surely the key point should always be consent, if that’s ignored or not sought, then there are issues immediately | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"She was playing devils advocate, she appended it in thought to a bill already put forward. Her idea was to provoke thought ...... and it did. i.e. Stop saying.. keep the women safe by keeping them in ...... She was putting the boot on the other foot and saying ..... How do you like THESE onions .... MEN STAY IN! She knows it would be ridiculous. She was trying for proper societal solutions ..... not knee jerk ineffective protect the victim actions." Yes this is my understanding and quite clever really. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"She was playing devils advocate, she appended it in thought to a bill already put forward. Her idea was to provoke thought ...... and it did. i.e. Stop saying.. keep the women safe by keeping them in ...... She was putting the boot on the other foot and saying ..... How do you like THESE onions .... MEN STAY IN! She knows it would be ridiculous. She was trying for proper societal solutions ..... not knee jerk ineffective protect the victim actions." Yep! A bit louder for those at the back Granny!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would only work if all women had to be home at 4 so our tea was ready at 6. " brave | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would only work if all women had to be home at 4 so our tea was ready at 6. brave " It’s pathetic brother it really is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would only work if all women had to be home at 4 so our tea was ready at 6. " What would you like babe ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". You disagree that it’s 98% however, until every person in the world is questioned, then the number is still up for question according to that thought process. At some point you have to recognise that (whether you refute the exact number) that statistic is horrific. " absolutely this. I mean, let's say some incredibly accurate research gets done, and it turns out it's not 98%, it's 50%. So what? It's still a huge issue and warrants action. There are blatant ways that men try and shut down conversation about violence towards women, and then there are more subtle ways... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would only work if all women had to be home at 4 so our tea was ready at 6. What would you like babe ?" My usual please bae | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"She was playing devils advocate, she appended it in thought to a bill already put forward. Her idea was to provoke thought ...... and it did. i.e. Stop saying.. keep the women safe by keeping them in ...... She was putting the boot on the other foot and saying ..... How do you like THESE onions .... MEN STAY IN! She knows it would be ridiculous. She was trying for proper societal solutions ..... not knee jerk ineffective protect the victim actions. Yet something that seems so unbelievably difficult to fucking grasp for many. " I'm sure if I wrote in the Daily DogDoo that Flying Saucers were free in Tesco for everyone that left their shoes n socks on the counter ,people would be walking home barefoot and expecting a delivery soon. 5G Viruses and Freddie Stars Hamster n all that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"She was playing devils advocate, she appended it in thought to a bill already put forward. Her idea was to provoke thought ...... and it did. i.e. Stop saying.. keep the women safe by keeping them in ...... She was putting the boot on the other foot and saying ..... How do you like THESE onions .... MEN STAY IN! She knows it would be ridiculous. She was trying for proper societal solutions ..... not knee jerk ineffective protect the victim actions. Yet something that seems so unbelievably difficult to fucking grasp for many. I'm sure if I wrote in the Daily DogDoo that Flying Saucers were free in Tesco for everyone that left their shoes n socks on the counter ,people would be walking home barefoot and expecting a delivery soon. 5G Viruses and Freddie Stars Hamster n all that." Exactly, especially when everyone knows that it’s the 5G that makes everyone gay. Bloody rags misreporting everything | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thoughts..?" absolutely ridiculous | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"She was playing devils advocate, she appended it in thought to a bill already put forward. Her idea was to provoke thought ...... and it did. i.e. Stop saying.. keep the women safe by keeping them in ...... She was putting the boot on the other foot and saying ..... How do you like THESE onions .... MEN STAY IN! She knows it would be ridiculous. She was trying for proper societal solutions ..... not knee jerk ineffective protect the victim actions. Yet something that seems so unbelievably difficult to fucking grasp for many. I'm sure if I wrote in the Daily DogDoo that Flying Saucers were free in Tesco for everyone that left their shoes n socks on the counter ,people would be walking home barefoot and expecting a delivery soon. 5G Viruses and Freddie Stars Hamster n all that. Exactly, especially when everyone knows that it’s the 5G that makes everyone gay. Bloody rags misreporting everything " sorry but I was gay well before 5g ever existed !!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I start work at 6pm tonight. Who will do the engineering in the factory and who will pay my wages as well as that of all the male staff on that particular shift? That’s a few thousand pounds already on one shift in one factory....not to mention the safety aspect of having extremely few police officers patrolling the streets overnight....probably the most ridiculous and thoughtless proposal and not to mention discriminatory " Your choosing not to understand the debate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Silly question. Silly debate." How ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could you imagine someone suggesting this and using any other gender, race, or other ism ? Why is it ok to say it about men? It must be true that ALL men are rapists and murderer's. It beggars belief how someone can come out with such a statement and not be reprimanded or suspended like someone would be if it involved a generalism based on race, religion or sexual orientation." People tell women not to go out after a certain time all the time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Silly question. Silly debate. How ?" Male curfew after 6pm? That's just silly, won't happen so why debate it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could you imagine someone suggesting this and using any other gender, race, or other ism ? Why is it ok to say it about men? It must be true that ALL men are rapists and murderer's. It beggars belief how someone can come out with such a statement and not be reprimanded or suspended like someone would be if it involved a generalism based on race, religion or sexual orientation." It was used to start a debate about womens safety. Why us that a problem? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I start work at 6pm tonight. Who will do the engineering in the factory and who will pay my wages as well as that of all the male staff on that particular shift? That’s a few thousand pounds already on one shift in one factory....not to mention the safety aspect of having extremely few police officers patrolling the streets overnight....probably the most ridiculous and thoughtless proposal and not to mention discriminatory Your choosing not to understand the debate. " I get the point of what they’re saying but that angle assumes that had this happened during the day or the perpetrator was a woman for example, would they adjust their proposal accordingly to highlight the situation? These things do happen and every one is tragic, more so when it’s an abuse of a position of trust. Much harsher sentencing might be more of a deterrent for some though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |