 |
By *aitonel OP Man
over a year ago
Travelling |
So I just spent about 30 minutes wording and writing up a thread to provoke and inspire discussion. Then, I realised that I knew exactly how the thread would play out, so I scrapped it and now you have this thread of pointlessness.
Enjoy! Do with it what you will |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eliWoman
over a year ago
. |
You should have kept it OP! Sometimes people might surprise you in how they reply. Having typed that, as soon as I read a few thread titles this morning I could tell how'd they play out - how the OP would respond, who would respond. Maybe yours could have been the one that breaks the mould. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Thank you for this pointless thread Kietonel and thank you for your permission to do with hit what I will.
I'm disappointed in you that you have judged and dismissed as if you are premonitorily gifted.
You have put yourself on the pedestal of censure. In the seat of cancel culture. On the platform of NO.
Worse still you have succumbed to what you experience as pressure.
You emit the stench of resignation and defeat.
Just post. Keep it within the rules and maybe surprise , redeem and lift yourself.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aitonel OP Man
over a year ago
Travelling |
"You should have kept it OP! Sometimes people might surprise you in how they reply. Having typed that, as soon as I read a few thread titles this morning I could tell how'd they play out - how the OP would respond, who would respond. Maybe yours could have been the one that breaks the mould. "
Was a highly controversial one, not with the intent to stir controversy but stir discussion.
Short version of it being down to sexual attraction/preference and where it should and should not be policed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You should have kept it OP! Sometimes people might surprise you in how they reply. Having typed that, as soon as I read a few thread titles this morning I could tell how'd they play out - how the OP would respond, who would respond. Maybe yours could have been the one that breaks the mould.
Was a highly controversial one, not with the intent to stir controversy but stir discussion.
Short version of it being down to sexual attraction/preference and where it should and should not be policed. "
Preferences policed ? No point in being on a swingers site if my preferences are going to be monitored and judged. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aitonel OP Man
over a year ago
Travelling |
"It sounds like a "should profiles be allowed to say 'no Asians -I'm not racist just my preference'" thread. "
That was the inspiration and would have been just a part of it yes.
But that right there is exactly why I steered from it, knowing exactly that people would focus on just one aspect. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aitonel OP Man
over a year ago
Travelling |
"You should have kept it OP! Sometimes people might surprise you in how they reply. Having typed that, as soon as I read a few thread titles this morning I could tell how'd they play out - how the OP would respond, who would respond. Maybe yours could have been the one that breaks the mould.
Was a highly controversial one, not with the intent to stir controversy but stir discussion.
Short version of it being down to sexual attraction/preference and where it should and should not be policed.
Preferences policed ? No point in being on a swingers site if my preferences are going to be monitored and judged."
Was not within the confines of just Fab. Policed in general. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You should have kept it OP! Sometimes people might surprise you in how they reply. Having typed that, as soon as I read a few thread titles this morning I could tell how'd they play out - how the OP would respond, who would respond. Maybe yours could have been the one that breaks the mould.
Was a highly controversial one, not with the intent to stir controversy but stir discussion.
Short version of it being down to sexual attraction/preference and where it should and should not be policed.
Preferences policed ? No point in being on a swingers site if my preferences are going to be monitored and judged.
Was not within the confines of just Fab. Policed in general. "
It is policed, there are social and legal restrictions. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
